UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended October 30, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 333-73552
| Michigan | 52-2186087 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) |
41605 Ann Arbor Road, Plymouth, Michigan 48170
(Address of principal executive offices)
(734) 455-3600
(Former address: 9135 General Court, Plymouth, Michigan 48170)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, $1.00 par value, outstanding as of October 30, 2004 was 28,416.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE
PLASTIPAK HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-K INDEX
i
PART I
This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements, including, in particular, the statements about our plans and strategies, included under Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Business. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward looking statements are set forth in this Item 1 under the caption Risks Related to Our Business and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Plastipak Holdings, Inc. (Plastipak) is a privately held Michigan corporation that was formed in 1998 to act as a holding company for several related companies. On October 30, 1999, Plastipak acquired all of the equity interests in Plastipak Packaging, Inc. (Packaging), Whiteline Express, Ltd. (Whiteline), Clean Tech, Inc. (Clean Tech) and TABB Realty, LLC (TABB), and a majority of the equity interests of Plastipak Packaging do Brasil, Ltda (Plastipak Brazil), through a reorganization (the Reorganization). Packaging, our principal operating company whose business commenced operations in 1967, designs and manufactures rigid plastic containers, and was incorporated in Delaware in 1982. Packaging also owns the remainder of Plastipak Brazil. Whiteline is a trucking company that serves our transportation and logistics needs, and was incorporated in Delaware in 1982. Clean Tech, a plastics recycling operation, provides a source of clean, high quality post-consumer recycled plastic raw material, and was incorporated in Michigan in 1989. TABB owns real estate and leases it to Packaging, Whiteline, and Clean Tech. Plastipak Brazil produces injection-molded plastic preforms and blow molds rigid plastic packaging in Paulinia and Manaus. Plastipak Brazil also maintains a sales office in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Recently we expanded our operations to include Central Europe by organizing three entities. Plastipak Slovakia s.r.o. and Plastipak Czech Republic s.r.o. were established as a wholly-owned subsidiaries of Packaging in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Plastipak Czech Republic, s.r.o. serves as a bottle manufacturing facility. Plastipak Slovakia s.r.o. serves as a technical and business center. In 2003, Clean Tech Slovakia s.r.o. was established as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clean Tech. Clean Tech Slovakia s.r.o. will serve as a post-consumer recycling operation in Europe. To this end, Clean Tech Slovakia s.r.o. acquired in October 2004 approximately 22 acres of land in the Kechnec Industrial Park, located approximately 10 miles outside the city of Kosice in eastern Slovakia, where we plan to construct this post-consumer recycling facility. Additionally, it is intended that this facility will produce preforms for sale in Eastern and Central Europe.
All of the Plastipak group of companies are headquartered in Plymouth, Michigan with the exception of our entities in Central Europe and Plastipak Brazil and its subsidiaries.
Plastipak is a leading manufacturer of plastic packaging containers for many of the worlds largest consumer products companies. During fiscal 2004, we manufactured and distributed approximately 8.5 billion containers worldwide for over 450 customers. In North America, we are the exclusive supplier of plastic containers to Procter & Gamble for heavy-duty, liquid laundry detergents and the largest supplier of plastic containers to Kraft Foods for their salad dressings, barbecue sauces and grated cheeses. We are recognized by our customers as an innovator in blow-molded package design and manufacturing, and we have obtained over 148 U.S. patents, many of which are registered in foreign countries, for our state-of-the-art, package-manufacturing processes. For 37 years, we have worked as a strategic partner with our customers in the early stages of their new marketing initiatives. We provide integrated transportation and logistics services, and satisfy our customers needs for recycling, reliability and dependability in plastic packaging. For the year ended October 30, 2004, our revenue was $1.0 billion, our earnings were $9.2 million and our EBITDA was $115.6 million. For reconciliation between net earnings and EBITDA see Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We have increased our revenue between 2000 and 2004 at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 9.4%. Further, all of our revenue growth has been organic. This continued growth is being driven by the advantages of plastic over glass and metal (e.g., weight, strength and shatter resistance), customer preferences for plastic and technological advances. We believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on the conversion trend and to increase our market share in our product categories.
1
To meet the demand of our diverse customer base, we operate fifteen plants in the United States, Brazil, Czech Republic and Slovakia. We locate our manufacturing plants near the filling sites of our key customers. In addition to our track record of innovative design, superior customer service and low-cost manufacturing processes, the proximity of our locations to our key customers helps us retain our major customers. The total square footage of our manufacturing and warehousing facilities is in excess of seven million square feet. We plan to use our relationships with key customers to create new opportunities in North and South America and in Central Europe.
OVERVIEW
Because our broad range of product lines serves customers in diverse industries and geographic regions, we believe our revenue and cash flow are relatively predictable, reducing our exposure to market or economic fluctuations. We have increased revenue organically between 2000 and 2004 at a CAGR of approximately 9.4%. To support our revenue growth, we have invested approximately $400.0 million in facilities, machinery and equipment over the last five years. We believe our commitment to investing in state-of-the-art facilities, machinery and equipment has resulted in significant additional capacity to serve our customers needs, and enables us to produce plastic containers at competitive prices.
In the year ended October 30, 2004, 66.2% of our revenue was generated by our top ten customers, all of whom are under contracts having terms of between one and five years. The customer, or we however, may terminate these contracts earlier under certain circumstances. Terms and conditions of our customer contracts vary, but in general the contracts are requirements contracts that do not obligate the customer to purchase any given amount of product from us.
Our primary raw materials consist of PET and HDPE resins. Although revenue is affected by fluctuations in resin prices, our gross margin is, in general, substantially unaffected by these fluctuations. In general, industry practice and contractual arrangements historically have permitted us to pass price increases through to our customers by means of corresponding changes in product pricing. As a result, we believe that our gross profits are relatively insulated from resin price fluctuations.
We design, manufacture and distribute plastic containers in four product categories:
| | Carbonated and non-carbonated beverage; | |||
| | Consumer cleaning; | |||
| | Food and processed juices; and | |||
| | Industrial, automotive and agricultural. | |||
OUR PRODUCT CATEGORIES
CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED BEVERAGE
We are a leader in the beverage packaging industry. Our carbonated and non-carbonated beverage business has continued to grow, as plastic has continued to make inroads in replacing other packaging materials, generating 44.1% of our revenues for the year ended October 30, 2004. This product category includes carbonated soft drinks (CSD), bottled water, juice drinks and beer. We have seen significant growth in non-CSD demand for PET bottles, which are clear and lightweight, and have become the standard for the bottled water industry. We are one of the largest suppliers of PET bottles used for Pepsis Aquafina and Dr Peppers Deja Blue water. In addition, we were awarded a long-term contract from the Buffalo Rock Company, the largest independently owned Pepsi franchise, to supply CSD and bottled water containers out of our facility in McCalla, Alabama.
We are also a leading producer of bottles for the CSD industry, where production complexity is relatively low and production runs are relatively long. We are a leading supplier to Pepsi Cola Bottlers of PET bottles for all of its Pepsi brands, including Pepsi, Diet Pepsi and Mountain Dew. Our other large CSD customers include InBev (South Americas largest brewer and formerly known as AmBev), Beverage Associates (Cadbury Beverages), Dr Pepper/Seven Up Bottling Group, and National Beverage.
2
CONSUMER CLEANING
Consumer cleaning container sales provided 29.6% of our revenue for the year ended October 30, 2004. Within this product category, Procter & Gamble and Reckitt Benckiser are among our largest customers. We are the sole supplier for all of Procter & Gambles branded heavy-duty, liquid laundry detergent containers in North America, including Tide, Cheer, Era and Gain. We also supply containers for various household products, such as Procter & Gambles Bounce and Febreze and Reckitt Benckisers Lysol, Resolve and Electrasol. We partner with many of our customers to create distinctive containers such as Procter & Gambles award-winning 300-oz. Tide dispenser bottle. We have long been an industry leader in developing new proprietary plastic packaging for consumer cleaning products. We also use many of our patents for value-added features such as in-mold labeling, where a plastic or paper brand label is molded into and becomes part of the actual plastic container in a single process, replacing glued-on, post-manufacture labeling. We use a sophisticated preferential heating process to produce oval PET bottles suitable for trigger spray applications, a product with growing popularity among consumers. We are pursuing significant growth opportunities associated with the continued conversion to HDPE and PET packaging of household cleaners. We continue to grow as liquid detergents, which are primarily packaged in plastic, capture market share from powdered detergents, which are primarily packaged in cardboard.
FOOD AND PROCESSED JUICES
We produce HDPE, PET and polypropylene (PP) containers for customers in the food industry, with a focus on customers for whom proprietary packaging designs are critical to product identification and distinction. For the year ended October 30, 2004, food and processed juices container sales accounted for 15.0% of our revenue. AC Humko, Kens Foods, Kraft Foods, Quaker Oats, Marzetti, The Kroger Company and Tropicana are among our primary customers in this product category. We are the largest supplier of plastic containers to Kraft Foods in North America for their salad dressings, 10-oz. and 18-oz. squeeze mayonnaise and Miracle Whip, barbecue sauces and grated cheeses. We also produce plastic containers for such popular processed foods as coffee creamers, relishes and vegetable oils.
Growth in this category has been driven by the continuing conversion from metal, glass and paper containers to plastic bottles, as the functionality, safety and improving economics of plastic became more apparent, and as consumer preference for plastic packaging continued to grow. PET squeeze bottles for such condiments as salad dressing and mayonnaise have proven extremely popular with consumers who recognize the added convenience that plastic provides.
We are increasing our activity and presence in the production of PET bottles required for the hot-fill packaging of shelf-stable juices and juice drinks. The hot-fill process, in which bottles are filled at between 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit to kill bacteria, permits the shipment and display of juices and juice drinks without refrigeration. The manufacturing process for hot-fill PET packaging is more demanding than that used for cold-fill beverage containers, and typically involves slower processing speeds, greater shape complexity and heavier weights. In addition, we were awarded a long-term contract from Pepsi to supply Gatorade bottles. In the second quarter of 2004, we began servicing this business out of our facility in Garland, Texas.
INDUSTRIAL, AUTOMOTIVE AND AGRICULTURAL
Castrol, SOPUS Products (Equilon Shell), Chevron/Texaco and Old World Industries (Peak) are among our major customers in this product category. To increase our product diversity, we have targeted end markets in this product category, including motor oil, antifreeze, windshield washer fluid and other specialty automotive aftermarket products. We also supply containers for BEHR deck cleaners and BASF chemical products. For the year ended October 30, 2004, industrial, automotive and agricultural container sales generated 5.5% of our revenue.
OUR COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIPS WITH MAJOR CONSUMER PRODUCT COMPANIES IN DIVERSE, STABLE INDUSTRIES
We enjoy long-standing relationships that average over 15 years with our top ten customers, including Kraft Foods (over 15 years), Pepsi Cola (over 15 years), Procter & Gamble (over 25 years) and Reckitt Benckiser (over 25 years). With our key customers, we have strategic-supply arrangements, many of which have three years or more remaining before renewal. We attribute these close relationships to our creative design and engineering capabilities, high level of customer service, high quality products, efficient manufacturing, reliable delivery, speed to market and experienced and stable management team and workforce.
3
We supply several of these customers with 100% of their plastic packaging needs nationally, regionally or for a specific brand, including Kraft Foods salad dressings and Tide liquid laundry detergent.
Our long-term relationships with our customers are strengthened by our ability to meet their need for cooperative package design and development processes. Our skilled and creative engineering staff and location of plants near key customers filling facilities encourage continued customer loyalty.
STRATEGICALLY LOCATED, STATE-OF-THE-ART OPERATING FACILITIES
We serve our U.S. customers through a nationwide network of fifteen strategically located, technologically advanced manufacturing facilities, through our Productivity Center in Jackson Center, Ohio, through our Packaging Development Center in Medina, Ohio, and a network of strategically located warehouse facilities. Brazil is served by manufacturing facilities in Paulinia and Manaus. We began serving Central Europe with our new manufacturing facility in Prague, Czech Republic. Our plants feature top quality injection molding machines, high speed blow molders (including the multi-station GEM-PAK technology, which was developed and patented by our manufacturing and engineering teams), computerized material and inventory handling, and machines modified to allow the quick changeover of molds to meet varying customer needs. Over the last five years, we have invested over $400.0 million in our facilities and state-of-the-art production equipment, which have significantly reduced our costs. Our facilities are strategically located near the filling sites of most of our key customers, which we believe enables us to facilitate just-in-time inventory management, eliminate costly shipping and handling charges, reduce working capital needs and foster the development of long-term manufacturing and distribution relationships. We believe that locating our facilities near our key customers also creates entry barriers for our competition. To enhance the quality of service extended to customers, we maintain a distribution fleet of approximately 300 tractors and 1,100 trailers and offer same-day delivery to many of our customers.
TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITIES
We are proud of our industry leading engineering and design capabilities and believe that we often earn and retain business as a result of these skills. Our packaging development and productivity centers have secured over 148 patents and continue to incorporate leading technology into customer-driven applications. We also believe we have a sustainable competitive advantage because we can produce prototypes of new designs with great speed and creativity for our customers. We were able to design and deliver a prototype to a customer just two weeks after they first explained their packaging concept to us. We have re-engineered existing manufacturing equipment to allow quick mold changeovers, reducing the changeover process from days to hours, giving us greater production flexibility.
Our Packaging Development Center creates innovative product designs for our customers, and our Productivity Center develops major process improvements in the manufacturing of our containers. Our customers rely on our design and technical expertise because brand distinctive package design is a critical component in many of their marketing programs. We have centered a substantial portion of our growth strategy on customers that require custom, as opposed to stock, plastic containers as a critical component of their marketing efforts.
CUSTOMER-ORIENTED CULTURE
In our 37 years in business, we have created a special culture focused on customer service. Plastipaks engineering teams participate in the early phases of our key customers new marketing initiatives. As an integrated team, we work alongside our customers to shape the design features of new packaging containers and develop new processes and equipment to manufacture those containers. Further, to ensure that our employees incentives are aligned with our customers objectives, compensation for approximately 500 key-manufacturing employees with leadership responsibility is based on operating and logistics performance measures. We believe these employee incentives will further enhance our strong relationships with key customers, help us attract new customers and allow us to control costs.
MANAGEMENT DEPTH AND EXPERIENCE
Our management team has an impressive track record of cultivating our customer base of major consumer product companies, launching innovative product designs and achieving profitable, organic growth. Our top 12 senior executives have on average 24 years experience in the industry and 20 years experience at Plastipak. Our executives are invested in our success through their over 90% ownership of our equity (See Other Risks Concentration of Ownership of our Common Stock We are Controlled by the Young Family). We believe our retention levels are among the highest in the industry.
4
Our management team includes engineers who have developed many of the processes that we have patented and use to our competitive advantage.
OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our strategy is to continue to increase our revenues and profitability and to further enhance our leading industry positions. From fiscal 2000 and 2004, we increased our revenues by 43.1% to $1.0 billion, our EBITDA by approximately $46.7 million to $115.6 million (see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and our production volume by 47.5% to 8.5 billion units, all through organic growth. We will continue to prudently invest in production equipment only after establishing contracts with our customers and completing our normal rigorous internal review process. The key components of our strategy include the following objectives:
CAPITALIZE ON CONTINUED INDUSTRY CONVERSION TO PLASTIC CONTAINERS
We expect the conversion of food products from glass, paper and cans to plastic containers will continue, which we believe is being driven by consumer preference, favorable total packaging economics, technology advances and improved functionality. We are well positioned to capitalize on the continuation of these trends. For example, these trends include hot-filled PET containers, plastic beer containers, various snack, dairy and juice drink applications.
In addition, we expect that over the next three to five years, as barrier technology progresses, a portion of the single serving beer container market will be converted to plastic, for use in venues where breakage is a concern. Brewers in the beer industry are strongly committed to brand identity and differentiation, and would prefer serving their product to customers in stadiums, concerts, sporting events, and at pools and beaches, in a way that permits them to maintain that identity (rather than in paper or plastic cups). Single serving plastic beer bottles offer that method.
We also believe that as barrier technology for smaller size plastic containers progresses, we will be positioned to compete for the conversion of single serving CSD packaging from aluminum cans and 10-oz. glass to plastic, a 60 billion-unit market.
Also, owing to environmental concerns about disposable plastic waste, the industries we serve are requiring more high-quality, recycled content in their plastic packaging. We have significant experience in producing high quality HDPE and PET containers with recycled content for various customers. We own a dedicated facility that produces post-consumer recycled plastic resin that offers us a secure source for recycled resin for our products. We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on this growing consumer interest toward recycling.
CONTINUE DEVELOPING VALUE-ADDED SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
Supported by our technology and packaging development centers, we have successfully researched, developed and launched new-patented technologies in our marketplace. We believe our success in this area differentiates us from our competitors and will enable us to continue to gain market share. For key customers, our technology development is an integral part of their overall marketing strategy and has helped our customers drive innovation in the marketplace.
EXPAND MARKET SHARE WITH KEY CUSTOMERS
Our high-quality, low-cost manufacturing capabilities and track record of focused customer service position us well to continue growing market share with our customer base of major consumer product companies. As our customers continue to acquire new businesses and brands, we believe that we will secure additional long-term contracts with them and grow our product offerings. Central to our strategy to expand market share with key customers are the continued:
| | Delivery of focused customer service; | |||
| | Location of facilities close to customer plants; | |||
| | Innovation in packaging design; and | |||
| | Provision of low cost manufacturing processes. | |||
We also intend to target strategic new customers who require our core competencies in blow and injection molding.
5
OUR CUSTOMERS
Substantially all of our sales are made to major branded consumer products companies, primarily in the United States. Our customers demand a high degree of packaging design and engineering to accommodate complex bottle shapes, performance requirements, materials, speed to market and reliable delivery. As a result, many customers opt for long-term contracts, many of which have terms of one to five years. All of our top ten customers are under contracts with terms between one and five years. These contracts, however, may be terminated earlier by us or by our customer upon a material breach of the contract or, in some cases in the event we determine it is not in our best interest to change our terms and conditions through the procedures outlined in the contract to meet competitive prices. Our customers have requested competitive price reductions from time to time in the past under their contracts with us.
In many cases, we are the sole supplier of all of a customers custom plastic bottle requirements nationally, regionally or for a specific brand. Our largest customer is Procter & Gamble. For fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, Procter & Gamble accounted for approximately 25%, 27% and 27% of our revenue, respectively. Our largest customers include:
| CUSTOMER | ||||
| CUSTOMER (a) | PRODUCT CATEGORY | SINCE | ||
Procter & Gamble
|
Consumer Cleaning | Mid 1970s | ||
Reckitt Benckiser
|
Consumer Cleaning | Mid 1970s | ||
Kraft Foods
|
Food and Processed Juices | Mid 1980s | ||
Old World
|
Industrial, Automotive and Agricultural | Mid 1980s | ||
The Kroger Company
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage, Food and Processed Juices | Late 1980s | ||
National Beverage
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Late 1980s | ||
Pepsi COBO
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Late 1980s | ||
AC Humko
|
Food and Processed Juices | Early 1990s | ||
PepsiAmerica
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Early 1990s | ||
InBev (Formerly known as AmBev)
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Mid 1990s | ||
Beverage Associates Cooperative |
||||
(Cadbury Beverages)
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Mid 1990s | ||
Dr Pepper Bottling Group
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Mid 1990s | ||
Pepsi CPG
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Mid 1990s | ||
SOPUS Products
|
Industrial, Automotive and Agricultural | Late 1990s | ||
Polar Beverages
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Late 1990s | ||
Quaker Oats
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage, Food and Processed Juices | Early 2000s | ||
Tropicana
|
Food and Processed Juices | Early 2000s | ||
Buffalo Rock Company
|
Carbonated and Non-Carbonated Beverage | Late 2003 |
(a) These companies include their predecessors, if applicable.
While our business is concentrated with our major customers, we believe that our technological skills and low-cost position, coupled with long-term partnering relationships with our customers, make the complete loss of any of these major customers less likely. Our ten largest customers have been associated with us for an average of over 15 years.
RAW MATERIALS
Resin and energy, the principal raw materials of our plastics business, have remained widely available to our U.S. operations, though subject to considerable price volatility. The majority of Plastipaks customer contracts allow us to pass through resin price increases on 30 days notice. Since we usually receive 30 days notice of price increases from our resin suppliers, we are generally able to tolerate price increases without substantial harm to profits, although contracts containing pass-through provisions may not be available to us in the future. See Risks Related to Our Business. As a major consumer of resin, we also leverage our bulk purchasing power to gain the best possible pricing and terms we can obtain.
Clean Tech has continued to be able to meet almost all of our needs for post-consumer recycled material. Post-consumer recycled material prices tend to fluctuate in tandem with the virgin resin markets, since demand for post-consumer recycled material increases as prices for virgin material rise above those for post-consumer recycled material.
6
Trade restrictions and currency devaluations have driven up the cost of imported resin in Brazil. See Risks Related to Our Business.
MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION
We serve our customers with a wide range of state-of-the-art manufacturing capabilities and services. Our fifteen manufacturing facilities are strategically located near the filling sites of our key customers. We believe that our proximity to key customers enables us to work closely with our customers, to facilitate just-in-time inventory management, to eliminate costly shipping and handling charges, to reduce working capital needs and to foster the development of long-term manufacturing and distribution relationships.
Over the past decade, we have made significant investments in equipment and manufacturing systems that have been designed to improve product quality and volume, and to enhance manufacturing efficiencies. Our specially designed material handling systems, facilities layout and production equipment give us the flexibility to manufacture products in standard production runs, as well as respond to immediate and specialized customer needs.
We continue to be an industry leader in production technologies for plastic containers by:
| | Efficiently manufacturing containers with specialized features, such as multiple layers, barrier coatings, in-mold labeling and bottles designed to accommodate trigger sprayers; | |||
| | Improving manufacturing technology to allow ever increasing production volumes without increasing the need for floor space (including the multi-station GEM-PAK, which we developed and patented and which significantly increases production capability as compared to older blow-molding machines); and | |||
| | Making innovative modifications to our blow molders to effect tooling changes in a matter of hours, instead of days, allowing quick shifts in product mix. | |||
To meet demand and reduce our inventory costs and better serve our customers needs, our facility managers receive real-time order and forecasting information from some of our customers.
Our subsidiary, Whiteline, is a fully licensed ICC common carrier, and serves approximately 70% of our transportation needs. With Whitelines fleet of approximately 300 tractors and 1,100 trailers, we offer same-day delivery to many of our customers.
PACKAGING DEVELOPMENT
Our Productivity and Packaging Development Centers create innovative product designs for our customers and process improvements in the manufacture of our containers. Our customers rely on our design and technical expertise because package design is a critical component in many of their marketing programs. We have an in-house staff of approximately 70 employees at our Productivity and Packaging Development Centers dedicated to product development and improvement. These professionals work closely with customers to develop new products and designs, often using sophisticated computer-aided design software.
We are capable of generating new product designs within weeks of customer requests. We also believe that our customized designs help our customers differentiate their products in the marketplace while also improving the appeal and performance of their products. We believe that these capabilities have given us a significant competitive advantage in certain high-margin niche container product markets where the ability to produce sophisticated package designs and deliver high quality graphics at a reasonable cost is crucial to a products success. Additionally, we have the engineering capabilities in-house to create new machines, which can more efficiently produce the proprietary products developed for our customers. We plan to continue to invest in research and development efforts and to focus on product, process and packaging innovation in order to remain competitive and better service our customers. Packaging development expenses were approximately $8.6 million, $8.0 million and $8.0 million for fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
7
SALES AND MARKETING
We reach our large and diversified base of over 450 customers primarily through our direct field sales force. A large number of our sales representatives focus their work on particular product lines and national accounts, while the remaining field sales staff covers specific geographic territories. We believe that our direct field sales force is able to focus on target markets and create strong, enduring customer relationships. A direct sales force also allows us to coordinate centralized pricing strategies.
FOREIGN OPERATIONS
Since 1996, we have expanded our operations into South America. We are working to leverage our relationships with new customers in Brazil into new opportunities in North and South America. Our initial operation was a plant located in suburban Sao Paulo (Paulinia), Brazil. We have a facility in Manaus, an area with favorable tax incentives in the state of Amazonia, Brazil. We also have a sales office in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Our Brazilian net revenue has grown 66% from 2000 to 2004 to $105.3 million for the year ended October 30, 2004. We believe that the global trend in the conversion of glass, metal and paper to plastic packaging will continue, particularly in the developing world, as consumer economies expand and industrialization continues.
We have established three entities in Central Europe, Plastipak Czech Republic, s.r.o., Plastipak Slovakia, s.r.o. and Clean Tech Slovakia, s.r.o. Plastipak Czech Republic, s.r.o. serves as a bottle manufacturing facility. Production for one of our major customers began in the fall of 2004. Currently we employ 15 employees and plan to hire approximately 10 additional people to support the new site.
Plastipak Slovakia is serving as our technical and business center for Europe. Plastipak Slovakia has begun providing sales, marketing and administrative services for Central Europe. Certain machine parts have already been ordered through this office and are under evaluation at our equipment development center.
In October 2004, Clean Tech Slovakia s.r.o. acquired from the Municipality of Kechnec, Slovakia, approximately 22 acres of land in the Kechnec Industrial Park, located approximately 10 miles outside the city of Kosice. In addition, it received written notice from the Recycling Fund, a business development arm of the federal government of Slovakia, of its award of 100 million Slovak Crowns, approximately U.S. $3.0 million, to be used in accordance with Clean Tech Slovakia s.r.o.s application to the Recycling Fund for its projects in Slovakia. We plan to construct a post-consumer recycling facility and produce preforms for sale in Eastern and Central Europe from this location. It is anticipated that the total initial investment will not exceed $20.0 million.
COMPETITION
We face substantial competition throughout our four product categories from a number of well-established national and regional companies. Our primary national competitors include Amcor PET Packaging, Graham Packaging Company, Consolidated Container Company, Constar International, Ball Plastics, Liqui-Box Corporation and Silgan Holdings, Inc. In addition, we face substantial competition from a number of captive packaging operations with significant in-house bottling and blow-molding capacity, such as Dean Foods, The Kroger Company, The Perrier Group of America and Suiza Foods.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We own over 148 U.S. patents, and have over 95 patent applications currently pending at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, over 268 foreign patents have been issued and are currently active, and approximately 134 are pending, although not all of our U.S. patents are registered in foreign countries. Our patents include patents for our GEM-PAK molding system, a gas clamping electronically controlled molding machine.
We are continually developing new patents. Because our patented packaging designs create goodwill and result in product differentiation, we believe that these intellectual property assets are important to our business. Our business is not dependent on any one of these patents, since plastics manufacturing technology continues to move forward rapidly. Patent protection, however, serves to keep the new technologies we develop proprietary, giving us a short, but important, window of competitive advantage.
8
In addition, we rely on proprietary know-how, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop products and maintain our competitive position. We attempt to protect our proprietary know-how and our other trade secrets by executing, when appropriate, confidentiality agreements with our customers and employees. We cannot assure you that our competitors will not discover comparable or the same knowledge and techniques through independent development or other means.
We have also licensed or sub-licensed certain of our intellectual property rights to third parties. These range from trimming systems that eliminate any plastic waste or chips from containers to our unique in-mold labeling equipment for bottle decoration. Some bottle designs are also licensed for revenue generation. In some cases, patented bottle designs are assigned or used by our customers, as their needs arise. Since our unique customer relationships allow us to be in on the ground floor in bottle design development, our customers often attain patent coverage for our joint design efforts.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
We are subject to national, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that impose limitations and prohibitions on the discharge and emission of, and establish standards for the use, disposal, and management of, some kinds of materials and waste, and impose liability for the costs of investigating and cleaning up, and damages resulting from, present and past spills, disposals, or other releases of hazardous substances or materials. Environmental laws and regulations can be complex and may change often. Compliance with these laws and regulations can require significant capital expenditures, and violations may result in substantial fines and penalties. In addition, environmental laws in the United States, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, impose liability on several grounds for the investigation and cleanup of contaminated soil, groundwater, and buildings, and for damages to natural resources, at a wide range of properties. For example, contamination at properties formerly owned or operated by us, as well as at properties we currently own or operate, and properties to which hazardous substances were sent by us, may result in liability for us under these environmental laws and regulations. As a manufacturer, we also have an inherent risk of liability under environmental laws and regulations regarding ongoing operations.
From time to time, we have been subject to claims asserted against us by regulatory agencies for environmental matters relating to the generation and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. Some of these claims have related to properties or business lines acquired by us after a release has occurred. In each known instance, however, we believe that the claims asserted against us, or obligations incurred by us, will not result in a material adverse effect upon our business, financial position or results of operations. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that activities at these facilities or facilities acquired in the future, or changes in environmental laws and regulations, will not result in additional environmental claims being asserted against us or additional investigations or remedial actions being required.
In addition, a number of governmental authorities in the United States and in other countries have enacted and are expected to continue to enact legislation aimed at reducing the amount of disposed plastic wastes. These programs have included, for example, mandating rates of recycling and/or the use of recycled materials, imposing deposits or taxes on plastic packaging material, and/or requiring retailers or manufacturers to take back packaging used for their products. This legislation, as well as voluntary initiatives similarly aimed at reducing the level of plastic wastes, could reduce the demand for some plastic packaging, result in greater costs for plastic packaging manufacturers or otherwise affect our business. To date, these initiatives and developments have not materially and adversely affected us. Some consumer products companies (including some of our customers) have responded to these governmental initiatives and to perceived environmental concerns of consumers by, for example, using bottles made in whole or in part of recycled plastic. Our subsidiary, Clean Tech, is among the top 20 suppliers of post-consumer recycled materials in the United States. Clean Tech supplies the majority of Plastipaks post-consumer recycled materials needs.
EMPLOYEES
We have approximately 3,700 non-union employees in the U.S. and 150 unionized employees in Brazil. To support our operations in Europe, we have employed approximately 15 employees. Given the seasonality of the plastic bottling industry, we expect to continue to employ temporary and seasonal workers during peak production months, in both the United States and Brazil. We have not had any material labor disputes in the past five years and consider our relations with our employees to be good.
9
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
COMPETITION WE FACE CONSIDERABLE COMPETITIVE RISKS.
We face substantial competition from a number of well-established national and regional companies. Our primary national competitors include Amcor PET Packaging, Consolidated Container Company, Constar International, Graham Packaging Company, Ball Plastics, and Silgan Holdings, Inc. In addition, we face substantial competition from a number of captive packaging operations with significant in-house bottling and blow-molding capacity, such as Dean Foods, The Kroger Company, The Perrier Group of America and Suiza Foods. Many of our competitors have financial and other resources that are substantially greater than ours. In order to compete successfully, we will need to continue to make substantial capital expenditures to develop new products and streamline our manufacturing processes. Competition in our industry could negatively affect our business operations.
CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS WE HAVE SEVERAL MAJOR CUSTOMERS, THE LOSS OF WHICH COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON US.
For the fiscal year ended October 30, 2004, our largest single customer accounted for approximately 27% of our revenue. Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 66.2% of our revenue. The termination by any of these customers of their relationship with us could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. All of our top ten customers are under contracts with terms of between one and five years. In general, these contracts are requirements contracts that do not obligate our customers to purchase any specific minimum product from us. These contracts may be terminated by us or by our customer prior to their expiration dates upon a material breach of the contract or, in some cases, in the event we determine it is not in our best interest to change our terms and conditions through the procedures outlined in the contract to meet competitive prices. Our customers have requested competitive price reductions from time to time in the past under their contracts with us.
ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL RISK IN SOUTH AMERICA AND EUROPE WE HAVE SPECIAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR SOUTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN OPERATIONS.
We have significant operations in Brazil. We currently have two plants located in Brazil. We also have a sales office in Buenos Aires, Argentina. For the year ended October 30, 2004, net sales of our Brazilian subsidiaries totaled approximately $105.3 million, representing approximately 10.0% of our worldwide revenue for such period. We experienced a net loss of approximately $6.0 million on our Brazilian sales for the year ended October 30, 2004.
Our results to date in Brazil have been less than we expected, as currency devaluations, high interest rates, inflation, import restrictions and a legal system which makes it difficult to enforce contracts have reduced both revenue and profits. Import duties on equipment needed to upgrade our production capabilities in Brazil are significant. We are working diligently to improve and expand our operations in Brazil to make them profitable, but we cannot assure you that our Brazilian operations will ever become profitable. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Business Foreign Operations.
The following factors create higher risks to our South American and European operations than we experience in the United States:
| | High nominal interest rates; | |||
| | Limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments; | |||
| | Imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments; | |||
| | Inability to fully utilize foreign tax credits and fully pass through foreign losses here in the U.S. due to limitations imposed by U.S. tax laws; | |||
| | The potential for political instability and inflation and the imposition or increase of restrictions on investments and other restrictions by foreign governments; | |||
| | Inability of our foreign subsidiaries to enforce certain of their key agreements through the legal systems in South America and Central Europe; | |||
10
| | and changes in tax laws. |
CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISKS WITH RESPECT TO OUR BRAZILIAN AND EUROPEAN OPERATIONS THAT WE CANNOT CONTROL.
In general, our results of operations are partially affected by changes in foreign exchange rates. Our Brazilian contracts are priced in U.S. dollars; however, we invoice our customers in the Brazilian Real and Argentine Peso, respectively. We have experienced several significant devaluations of Brazils currency, despite make whole agreements in our contracts, some of our customers agreed to only partial price increases. These increases accounted for only a portion of the cost to us of devaluation, leading to a reduction in our gross margin in Brazil.
Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our results of operations. Because our consolidated financial results are reported in dollars, if we generate sales or earnings in other currencies the translation of those results into dollars can result in a significant increase or decrease in the amount of those sales or earnings. In addition, our debt service requirements are primarily in U.S. dollars, even though a portion of our cash flow is generated in the Brazilian Real. Significant changes in the value of the Brazilian Real relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to meet interest and principal payments on U.S. dollar denominated debt, including the exchange notes and borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement. Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not be able to effectively manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks. It is expected that the volatility in currency exchange rates will continue to have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries. We expect that the portion of our revenue denominated in non-dollar currencies will continue to increase in future periods. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Effects of Changes in Exchange Rates. In addition, the value of our investment in Plastipak Brazil is partially a function of the currency exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilian Real.
Any change in value of the Euro as compared to the U.S. dollar may impact start-up costs and results of operations associated with our new activities in Central Europe. We have not executed hedge transactions to endeavor to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risks, and do not believe that hedging is a viable option for us in the immediate future.
FUTURE CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS IF WE CANNOT OBTAIN THE FUNDS TO MAKE THE SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES THAT OUR BUSINESS WILL REQUIRE, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN OUR CURRENT LEVEL OF OPERATIONS OR GROW OUR BUSINESS.
To fund our growth plans and maintain our current level of operations, we will continue to make substantial capital expenditures for product development and improvements in our manufacturing processes. In fiscal 2003 and 2004, we made capital expenditures, including the assumption of capital leases, of approximately $107.3 million and $121.6 million, respectively. We estimate that capital expenditures in each of fiscal 2005 and 2006 will be approximately $85.0 million and $70.0 million, respectively. In addition, we may be required to make additional investments as the demands of our industry and our customers evolve. We may not be able to fund any necessary investments, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ACQUISITION STRATEGY WE COULD FACE CONSIDERABLE BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL RISKS IN IMPLEMENTING OUR ACQUISITION STRATEGY.
Our growth strategy may include acquisitions of other consumer goods packaging businesses, although we do not currently have any commitments or agreements with respect to any such acquisitions. Risks we could face with respect to acquisitions include:
| | Problems in assimilating operations, technologies, services and products; | |||
| | Diversion of managements attention from existing business concerns; and | |||
| | Incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities. | |||
Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may not be successful in consummating future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all.
11
EXPOSURE TO FLUCTUATIONS IN RESIN PRICES AND DEPENDENCE ON RESIN SUPPLIERS WE ARE EXPOSED TO THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FLUCTUATIONS IN THE PRICES OF RESIN.
We face the risk that our access to resin is interrupted or that we may not be able to purchase it at competitive prices. We use large quantities of plastic resins in manufacturing our products. Plastic resins accounted for a major portion of our cost of goods sold in fiscal 2004. Plastic resins are subject to substantial price fluctuations caused by shortages in supply and changes in the prices of natural gas, crude oil and other petrochemical products from which these resins are produced. We may experience supply interruptions in the future. Our purchases of raw materials are subject to market prices. Although we generally have pass through provisions in many of our customer contracts, market conditions may not permit us to pass through any future raw material price increases. The inability to procure resin or significant increases in resin prices, coupled with an inability to promptly pass such increases on to customers, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, a significant increase in resin prices could slow the pace of conversion from paper, glass and metal containers to plastic containers to the extent that these costs are passed on to the customer. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Business Raw Materials.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL WE ARE DEPENDENT ON SEVERAL KEY SENIOR MANAGERS, THE LOSS OF WHOM COULD HAVE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND DEVELOPMENT.
Our business and our future success depend to a significant extent upon the continued service of our executive officers and senior managers. In particular, the loss of the services provided by William C. Young, William A. Slat, Michael J. Plotzke, Gene W. Mueller, Pradeep Modi, Thomas Busard, Frank Pollock, Richard Darr, J. Ronald Overbeck, Leann M. Underhill and David Daugherty, among others, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Our failure to retain such key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
OTHER RISKS
CONCENTRATION OF OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK WE ARE CONTROLLED BY THE YOUNG FAMILY.
William C. Young, our Chief Executive Officer, and members of his immediate family own over 90% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis and, therefore, control our board of directors. As a result, the Young family will continue to have the ability to elect and remove directors and determine the outcome of matters presented for approval by our shareholders. Circumstances may occur in which the interests of the Young family could be in conflict with the interests of the holders of our 10.75% Senior Notes.
REGULATION OUR OPERATIONS AND PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS.
Our operations and properties are subject to stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to pollution, environmental protection and workplace health and safety. Such laws and regulations frequently change, are different in every jurisdiction, and can impose substantial fines and sanctions for violations. Our operations must comply with these laws, and must adapt to regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions in which we operate as these requirements change.
Environmental laws generally impose liability for costs to investigate and remediate contamination without regard to fault and, under certain circumstances, liability may be joint and several resulting in one responsible party being held responsible for the entire obligation. We have incurred, and may continue to incur, such costs related to at least two of our properties.
Although we believe our operations and properties are substantially in compliance, new laws and regulations, stricter enforcement or interpretation of existing laws and regulations or the discovery of previously unknown contamination or previously unknown off-site liability, the imposition of new clean-up requirements, or claims for property damage or personal injury arising from environmental matters could require us to incur costs or become the basis for the new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
12
Legislation concerning mandatory rates of recycling, mandatory use of recycled materials, deposits or taxes on plastic packaging material or requirements that retailers or manufacturers take back packaging used for their products could reduce the demand for certain plastic packaging, result in greater costs for plastic packaging manufacturers and, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
PRODUCTS LIABILITY RISK WE FACE PRODUCTS LIABILITY RISK. IN ADDITION, OUR BUSINESS IS EXPOSED TO THE PRODUCTS LIABILITY RISK OF OUR CUSTOMERS .
Because our plastic containers are used for consumer products, our business is exposed to products liability risk and the risk of negative publicity. The amount and scope of our product liability insurance may not be adequate to cover a products liability claim that is successfully asserted against us.
In addition, we are exposed to the products liability risk and negative publicity of our customers and suppliers. Because many of our customers are carbonated soft drink, dairy, water and branded consumer products companies, with their own products liability risk, our sales may decline if any of our or our competitors customers are sued on a products liability claim. We may also suffer a decline in sales from the negative publicity associated with such a lawsuit or with adverse public perceptions in general regarding our products or our customers products in our containers.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION WE ENJOY LIMITED PROTECTION FOR OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND ARE SUBJECT TO A PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIM.
We have a number of patents covering design and construction of our products and manufacturing equipment. Patents do not ensure that competitors will not develop competing products or infringe upon our patents, or that the patents will withstand challenge in litigation. The costs of litigation to defend our patents could be substantial and may outweigh the benefits of enforcing our rights under our patents. Patent laws of foreign countries may offer less protection than the patent laws of the United States.
We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology, trade secrets and know-how. Others may independently develop the same or similar technology or otherwise obtain access to our unpatented technology. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, we could be materially adversely affected.
In 1999, North American Container filed a lawsuit against us and 41 other defendants claiming some of our products infringe one of their patents and requesting an unspecified amount in damages. See Item 3 Legal Proceedings. Discovery has been completed. On February 24, 2004, the U.S. District Court entered a judgment of non-infringement of all accused containers for all defendants, and a judgment of invalidity for some of the claims. North American Container has appealed this judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the appeal is in process. If we do not prevail in the litigation, our business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal executive offices are located at 41605 Ann Arbor Road, Plymouth, Michigan 48170. We occupy a number of owned and leased properties located throughout the United States, Brazil, Argentina and the Slovak and Czech Republics for our technical centers, manufacturing plants, corporate headquarters and sales offices. We currently utilize 42 facilities, 16 of which we own and 26 of which we lease. Our interests in all of our U.S. facilities are pledged to secure our current credit facility. Of these 42 facilities, 38 are located in the United States, 2 are located in South America and 2 are located in Central Europe.
The Company acquired two additional parcels of land in 2004, one in Brazil and one in Slovakia. In Brazil, we foreclosed in payment of a debt on a piece of land aggregating 132,396 square feet in the state of Pernambuco. We currently lease the approximately 45,208 square foot warehouse facility to a third party. In Slovakia, Clean Tech Slovakia s.r.o. acquired in October 2004 approximately 22 acres of land in the Kechnec Industrial Park, located approximately 10 miles outside the city of Kosice in eastern Slovakia, from the Municipality of Kechnec. We plan to construct a post-consumer recycling facility and manufacture performs for sale in Eastern and Central Europe at this location.
13
The following table lists the location, square footage, and principal use and ownership interest in our facilities.
| LOCATION | SQUARE FOOTAGE | PRINCIPAL USE | OWNED/LEASED | |||
Jackson Center, OH |
66,000 | Productivity Center | Owned | |||
Medina, OH |
13,200 | Packaging & Development Center | Owned | |||
Champaign, IL |
683,300 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Dundee, MI |
135,300 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
East Longmeadow, MA |
262,700 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Garland, TX |
415,900 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Highland, TX |
84,100 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Jackson Center, OH |
995,300 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Lima, OH |
126,600 | Warehouse | Owned | |||
Manaus, Brazil |
82,600 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
McCalla, AL |
296,300 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Medina, OH |
279,600 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Paulinia, Brazil |
177,400 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Pineville, LA |
566,000 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Plant City, FL |
78,400 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Westland, MI |
184,600 | Manufacturing | Owned | |||
Alsip, IL |
204,586 | Manufacturing, Warehouse | Leased | |||
Alsip, IL |
100,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Atlanta, GA |
76,800 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Ayer, MA |
77,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Canton, MI |
35,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Canton, MI |
24,174 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Champaign, IL |
187,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Champaign, IL |
208,630 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Champaign, IL |
85,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Champaign, IL |
145,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Champaign, IL |
8,285 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Dallas, TX |
208,712 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Garland, TX |
200,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Channelview, TX |
140,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Lakeland, FL |
127,200 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Lima, OH |
100,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Lima, OH |
100,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Lima, OH |
60,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Medina, OH |
75,500 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Medina, OH |
6,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Medina, OH |
74,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Romulus, MI |
246,750 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Westland, MI |
12,000 | Warehouse | Leased | |||
Plymouth, MI |
32,000 | Truck Garage | Leased | |||
Plymouth, MI |
129,783 | Headquarters | Leased | |||
Bratislava, Slovak. Rep. |
10,000 | Development Center | Leased | |||
Prague, Czech Rep. |
80,000 | Manufacturing | Leased |
We believe that our plants, which are of varying ages and types of construction, are in good condition, are suitable for our operations and generally provide sufficient capacity to meet our requirements for the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. We cannot estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability of this litigation but we believe, based on our examination of these matters, experience to date and discussions with counsel, that the ultimate liability will not be material to our business, financial condition or results of operations.
14
In the fall of 1999, North American Container, Inc. (NAC) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Civil Action No. 3-99CV1749-D), claiming damages in an unspecified amount against Plastipak and 41 other defendants for the alleged infringement of NAC U.S. Patent No. 5,072,841. On April 4, 2000 this patent reissued as patent RE 36,639, with 14 new claims. The new claims were the primary focus of NACs case against Plastipak and the major manufacturers, as well as major food and beverage distributors. Plastipak and the other defendants are vigorously defending this claim on the bases of both the invalidity of the patent and on non-infringement. On February 24, 2004, the U.S. District Court entered a judgment of non-infringement of all accused containers for all defendants, and a judgment of invalidity for some of the claims. North American Container has appealed this judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the appeal is in process. It is our continued belief that Plastipak and other defendants will prevail on appeal in this case. The existing reserve will be maintained, decreased, or increased based on contemporaneously evaluating the status of the ongoing appeal. Our future cost of defending this action for a protracted period of time could exceed $1.0 million.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURTIES
There is no public market for Plastipak Holdings, common equity.
On October 27, 2004, Gene Mueller exercised 100 options under the 2002 Restricted Stock Bonus Plan. See Item 11, Executive Compensation. We received $100.00 of net proceeds upon Mr. Muellers exercise of these options. The issuance of 100 shares of common stock to Mr. Mueller upon the exercise of these options was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data for the five fiscal years ended October 30, 2004 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
| (dollar amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
$ | 701,872 | $ | 809,774 | $ | 812,190 | $ | 897,829 | $ | 1,004,045 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
625,691 | 709,012 | 697,001 | 777,670 | 874,301 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
76,181 | 100,762 | 115,189 | 120,159 | 129,744 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
50,958 | 64,477 | 68,506 | 74,965 | 80,034 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
25,223 | 36,285 | 46,683 | 45,194 | 49,710 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
27,028 | 28,956 | 35,099 | 36,902 | 35,780 | |||||||||||||||