Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

Form 10-K

AGREE REALTY CORPORATION

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ü                No      

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.       

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  Yes  ü                No      

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s shares of common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $108,892,877 as of June 30, 2003, based on the closing price of $24.31 on the NYSE on that date.

As of March 8, 2004, the number of shares of common stock of the Registrant outstanding was 6,466,971.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART 1

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

     We have made statements in this Form 10-K that are “forward- Looking” in that they do not discuss historical facts but instead note future expectations, projections, intentions or other items relating to the future.

     Forward-looking statements, which are generally prefaced by the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar terms, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other facts that may cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Many of those factors are noted in conjunction with the forward-looking statements in the text. Other important factors that could cause our actual results to differ include:

	•		Our inability to effect the development or acquisition of properties on favorable terms.
	•		The effect of economic conditions. If an economic downturn occurs, any corresponding decrease in disposable income could result in consumers being less willing to purchase goods from our tenants which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our financial condition and results of operations could also be adversely affected if our tenants are otherwise unable to make lease payments or fail to renew their leases.
	•		Our inability to obtain long-term financing at interest rates that will allow us to offer attractive rental rates to our tenants in order to continue the development or acquisition of retail properties leased to national tenants on a long-term basis.
	•		Actions of our competitors. We seek to remain competitive in the development of real estate assets in the markets that we currently serve. With regard to our acquisition of properties, we compete with insurance companies, credit companies, pension funds, private individuals, investment companies and other REITs, some of which have greater resources than we do.
	•		Failure to qualify as a REIT. Although we believe that we were organized and have been operating in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify as a REIT.
	•		Changes in government regulations, tax rates and similar matters, For example, changes in real estate and zoning laws, environmental uncertainties and natural disasters could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

     Other risk uncertainties and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected are discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of this Form 10-K.

     We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of

Table of Contents

these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K might not occur.

     References herein to the “Company” include Agree Realty Corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its majority owned operating partnership, Agree Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), unless the context otherwise requires.

Item 1. BUSINESS

General

     Agree Realty Corporation is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) that focuses primarily on the development, acquisition and ownership of retail properties net leased to national tenants. We were formed in December 1993 to continue and expand the retail business founded in 1971 by our current President and Chairman, Richard Agree. We specialize in building properties for national retailers who have signed long-term net leases prior to commencement of construction. All of our freestanding property tenants and most of our community shopping center tenants have triple-net leases which typically require the tenant to be responsible for property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. We believe this strategy provides us with a generally consistent source of income and cash for distributions and also provides opportunities for development of additional properties at attractive returns on investment, without the risks associated with speculative development.

     At December 31, 2003, our portfolio consisted of 50 properties, owned either directly or through joint ventures, located in 13 states and contained an aggregate of approximately 3.5 million square feet of gross leasable area. Our portfolio includes 37 freestanding net leased properties and 13 community shopping centers that as of December 31, 2003 were 97% leased with a weighted average lease term of approximately 11.9 years. As of December 31, 2003, approximately 67% of our annualized lease revenue is derived from our top three tenants: Borders Group, Inc. (Borders) – 33%, Walgreen Co. (Walgreen) – 17% and Kmart Corporation (Kmart) — 17%. As of December 31, 2003 approximately 88% of our annualized lease revenue is derived from national tenants.

     We expect to continue to grow our asset base primarily through the development of new retail properties that are pre-leased on a long-term basis to national tenants. Since our initial public offering in 1994, we have developed 27 properties, one of which we sold in 2003. We developed 31 of our 37 freestanding properties and all 13 of our community shopping centers. We focus on development because we believe it generally provides us a higher return on investment than the acquisition of similarly located properties. We expect to continue to expand our tenant relationships and diversify our tenant base to include other quality national tenants.

Growth Strategy

     Our growth strategy is to continue to develop retail properties pre-leased on a long-term basis to national tenants. We believe that a development strategy combined with substantial pre-leasing will produce

Table of Contents

superior risk adjusted returns. To effect this strategy, we first identify a land parcel that we believe is an attractive retail location for one of our tenant relationships. The location must be in a concentrated retail corridor, have high traffic counts, good visibility and demographics compatible with the needs of the particular retail tenant. Then we propose to that tenant that we execute a long-term net lease for the finished development on that site.

     Once the lease is executed, we close on the land and pursue all the necessary approvals to begin development. We direct all aspects of the development, including construction, design, leasing and management. Property management and the majority of the leasing activities are handled directly by our personnel. We believe that this hands-on approach to development and property management enhances our ability to maximize the long-term value of our properties.

Financing Strategy

     The majority of our indebtedness is fixed rate, non-recourse and long-term in nature. Whenever possible, we use long-term financing for our properties to match the underlying long-term leases. As of December 31, 2003, the average weighted maturity of our long- term debt was 16.4 years. We intend to limit our floating rate debt to borrowings under our credit facilities, which are primarily used to finance new development and acquisitions. Once development of a project is completed, we typically refinance this floating rate debt with long-term, fixed rate, non-recourse debt. We intend to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (including construction and acquisition financing) to market capitalization of 65% or less.

     We may from time to time re-evaluate our borrowing policies in light of the then current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity, capital, market value of properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. There is no contractual limit on our ratio of total indebtedness to total market capitalization, and accordingly, we may modify our borrowing policy and may increase or decrease our ratio of debt to market capitalization without stockholder approval.

Property Management

     We maintain an active leasing and capital improvement program that, combined with the quality and locations of our properties, has made our properties attractive to tenants. We intend to continue to hold our properties for long-term investment and accordingly, place a strong emphasis on quality construction and an on-going program of regular maintenance. Our properties are designed to require minimal capital improvements other than renovations or expansions paid for by tenants. At our 13 community shopping centers properties, we sub-contract on-site functions such as maintenance, landscaping, snow removal, sweeping, plumbing and electrical and, to the extent permitted by the respective leases, our cost of these functions is reimbursed by our tenants. Personnel from our corporate headquarters conduct regular inspections of each property and maintain regular contact with major tenants.

     We have a management information system designed to provide management with the operating data necessary to make informed business decisions on a timely basis. This computer system provides us immediate access to store availability, lease data, tenants’ sales history, cash

Table of Contents

flow budgets and forecasts, and enables us to maximize cash flow from operations and closely monitor corporate expenses.

Agree Limited Partnership

     Our assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted through, Agree Limited Partnership (Operating Partnership), of which we are the sole general partner and held a 90.52% interest as of December 31, 2003. Under the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, we, as the sole general partner, have exclusive responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the Operating Partnership.

Recent Developments

     During 2003 we completed the development of two (2) freestanding net leased properties that added 17,986 square feet of gross leasable area to our operating portfolio and cost approximately $4.5 million. The properties are leased to Walgreen Co. and Citizens Bank.

     During 2003 we acquired a freestanding net leased property that added 11,180 square feet of gross leasable area to our operating portfolio and cost approximately $3.7 million. The property is located in Canton Township, Michigan and is leased to Rite Aid of Michigan, Inc.

     During 2003, we also acquired the interest of our joint venture partner in two (2) Joint Venture Properties and now own 100% of the properties. The properties are located in Ann Arbor, Michigan and Tulsa, Oklahoma. The cost to acquire the Ann Arbor interest was approximately $7.7 million and was financed with a fixed rate self- amortizing mortgage at a rate of 6.50%. The cost to acquire the Tulsa interest was approximately $4.8 million and was funded using our credit facility.

     During 2003 we sold a community shopping center located in Winter Garden, Florida. We developed the 233,512 square foot Kmart anchored shopping center in 1988. The property was sold to a private investor for approximately $8.5 million.

     Our headquarters are located at 31850 Northwestern Highway, Farmington Hills, MI 48334 and our telephone number is (248) 737-4190. Our web site address is www.agreerealty.com. Agree Realty Corporation’s SEC filings can be accessed through this site.

Risk Factors

     General

     We rely on a few major tenants. As of December 31, 2004, we derived approximately 67% of our annualized base rent from three major tenants, Borders, Kmart and Walgreen. In the event of a default by any of these tenants under their leases, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as lessor and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment. The bankruptcy or insolvency of any of the major tenants would be likely to have a material adverse effect on the properties affected and the income produced by those properties and correspondingly our ability to make distributions.

     In the event that certain tenants cease to occupy a property, although under most circumstances such a tenant would remain liable for its lease payments, such an action may result in certain other tenants

Table of Contents

having the right to terminate their leases at the affected property, which could adversely affect the future income from that property. As of December 31, 2003, 13 of our properties had tenants with those provisions in their leases.

     We could be adversely affected by a tenant’s bankruptcy. If a tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, that could diminish the income we expect from that tenant’s leases. We may not be able to evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. On the other hand, a bankruptcy court might authorize the tenant to terminate its leases with us. If that happens, our claim against the bankruptcy tenant for unpaid future rent would be subject to statutory limitations that might be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the leases. In addition, any claim we have for unpaid past rent would likely not be paid in full. One of our major tenants, Kmart, recently emerged from bankruptcy. As part of their plan of reorganization, Kmart terminated one of our leases and modified one other lease. We cannot predict what effect a future Kmart bankruptcy or the bankruptcy of any other major tenant will have on us. A failure by Kmart to successfully implement its reorganization plan or to continue as a going concern could result in Kmart’s inability to maintain its lease payments to us or to attempt to renegotiate or terminate leases.

     Risks involved in single tenant leases. We focus our development activities on net leased real estate or interests therein. Because our properties are generally leased to single tenants, the financial failure of or other default by a tenant resulting in the termination of a lease is likely to cause a significant reduction in our operating cash flow and might decrease the value of the property leased to such tenant.

     Risks associated with borrowing, including loss of properties in the event of a foreclosure. At December 31, 2003, our ratio of indebtedness to market capitalization was approximately 30%. Certain of our properties may have a ratio of long-term debt to tangible asset value exceeding 50%. The use of leverage presents an additional element of risk in the event that (1) the cash flow from lease payments on our properties is insufficient to meet debt obligations, (2) we are unable to refinance our debt obligations as necessary or on as favorable terms or (3) there is an increase in interest rates. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the property could be foreclosed upon with a consequent loss of income and asset value to Agree. Under the “cross-default” provisions contained in mortgages encumbering some of our properties, a default by Agree under its mortgage with a lender would result in a default by Agree under mortgages held by the same lender on other properties.

     Risks associated with our development and acquisition activities. We intend to continue development of new properties and to consider possible acquisitions of existing properties. New project development is subject to a number of risks, including risks of construction delays or cost overruns that may increase project costs, risks that the properties will not achieve anticipated occupancy levels or sustain anticipated rent levels, and new project commencement risks such as receipt of zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations and the incurrence of development costs in connection with projects that are not pursued to completion. In addition, we anticipate that our new development will be financed under lines of credit or other forms of construction financing that will result in a risk that permanent financing on newly developed projects might not be

Table of Contents

available or would be available only on disadvantageous terms. In addition, the fact that we must distribute 90% of our taxable income in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT will limit our ability to rely upon income from operations or cash flow from operations to finance new development or acquisitions. As a result, if permanent debt or equity financing was not available on acceptable terms to refinance new development or acquisitions undertaken without permanent financing, further development activities or acquisitions might be curtailed or cash available for distribution might be adversely affected. Acquisitions entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations and that judgments with respect to the costs of improvements to bring an acquired property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property will prove inaccurate, as well as general investment risks associated with any new real estate investment.

     Our portfolio has limited geographic diversification. Our properties are located primarily in the Midwestern United States and Florida. The concentration of our properties in a limited number of geographic regions creates the risk that, should these regions experience an economic downturn, our operations may be adversely affected. For example, 26 of our properties are located in Michigan. Should Michigan experience an economic downturn, our operations and our rentals from our Michigan properties could be adversely affected.

     Dependence on key personnel. We are dependent on the efforts of our executive officers and directors. The loss of one or more of our executive officers or directors would likely have a material adverse effect on our future development or acquisition operations, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We do not presently have key-man life insurance for any of our employees.

     We are not limited by our organization documents as to the amount of debt we may incur. We intend to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (including construction or acquisition financing) to market capitalization of 65% or less. Nevertheless, we may operate with debt levels which are in excess of 65% of market capitalization for extended periods of time. Our organization documents contain no limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness which we may incur. Therefore, our board of directors, without a vote of the stockholders, could alter the general policy on borrowings at any time. If our debt capitalization policy were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our operating cash flow and our ability to make expected distributions to stockholders, and could result in an increased risk of default on our obligations.

     We can change our investment and financing policies without stockholder approval. Our investment and financing policies, and our policies with respect to certain other activities, including our growth, debt capitalization, distributions, REIT status and investment and operating policies, are determined by our Board of Directors. Although we have no present intention to do so, these policies may be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of our Board of Directors without a vote of our stockholders.

     Competition. We face competition in seeking properties for acquisition and tenants who will lease space in these properties from insurance companies, credit companies, pension funds, private individuals, investment companies and other REITs, many of which have

Table of Contents

greater financial and other resources than we do. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete with such entities in its development, acquisition and leasing activities in the future.

     Uncertainties relating to lease renewals and re-letting of space. We are subject to the risks that, upon expiration of leases for space located in our properties, the premises may not be re-let or the terms of re-letting (including the cost of concessions to tenants) may be less favorable than current lease terms. If we are unable to re-let promptly all or a substantial portion of our retailers or if the rental rates upon such re-letting were significantly lower than expected rates, our net income and ability to make expected distributions to shareholders would be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain tenants in any of our properties upon the expiration of their leases.

     We must obtain new financing in order to grow. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our net income to stockholders in the form of dividends. This means we are limited in our ability to use internal capital to acquire properties and must continually raise new capital in order to continue to grow and diversify our real estate portfolio. Our ability to raise new capital depends in part on factors beyond our control, including conditions in equity and credit markets, conditions in the retail industry and the performance of REITs generally. We continually consider and evaluate a variety of potential transactions to raise additional capital, but we cannot assure that attractive alternatives will always be available to us, nor that our common share price will increase or remain at a level that will permit us to continue to raise equity capital privately or publicly.

     Risks Associated With Investment In Real Estate

     There are risks associated with owning and leasing real estate. Although our lease terms obligate the tenants to bear substantially all of the costs of operating our properties, investing in real estate involves a number of risks, including:

	•		The risk that tenants will not perform under their leases, reducing our income from the leases or requiring us to assume the cost of performing obligations (such as taxes, insurance and maintenance) that are the tenant’s responsibility under the lease.
	•		The risk that changes in economic conditions or real estate markets may adversely affect the value of our properties.
	•		The risk that local conditions (such as oversupply of similar properties) could adversely affect the value of our properties.
	•		The risk that we may not always be able to lease properties at favorable rates.
	•		The risk that we may not always be able to sell a property when we desire to do so at a favorable price.

Table of Contents

•

The risk of changes in tax, zoning or other laws could make properties less attractive or less profitable.

If a tenant fails to perform on its lease covenants, that would not excuse us from meeting any mortgage debt obligation secured by the property and could require us to fund reserves in favor of our mortgage lenders, thereby reducing funds available for payment of dividends on our shares of common stock. We cannot be assured that tenants will elect to renew their leases when the terms expire. If a tenant does not renew its lease or if a tenant defaults on its lease obligations, there is no assurance we could obtain a substitute tenant on acceptable terms. If we cannot obtain another tenant with comparable structural needs, we may be required to modify the property for a different use, which may involve a significant capital expenditure and a delay in re-leasing the property.

     Some potential losses are not covered by insurance. Our leases require the tenants to carry comprehensive liability, casualty, workers’ compensation, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on our properties. We believe the required coverage is of the type, and amount, customarily obtained by an owner of similar properties. We believe all of our properties are adequately insured. However, there are some types of losses, such as terrorist acts or catastrophic acts of nature, for which we or our tenants cannot obtain insurance at an acceptable cost. If there is an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insurance limits, we could lose both the revenues generated by the affected property and the capital we have invested in the property. We would, however, remain obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property.

     Potential liability for environmental contamination could result in substantial costs. Under federal, state and local environmental laws, we may be required to investigate and clean up any release of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products at our properties, regardless of our knowledge or actual responsibility, simply because of our current or past ownership of the real estate. If unidentified environmental problems arise, we may have to make substantial payments, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. This potential liability results from the fact that:

	•		As owner we may have to pay for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination.
	•		The law may impose clean-up responsibility and liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination.
	•		Even if more than one person is responsible for the contamination, each person who shares legal liability under environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs.
	•		Governmental entities and third parties may sue the owner or operator of a contaminated site for damages and costs.

These costs could be substantial and in extreme cases could exceed the value of the contaminated property. The presence of hazardous

Table of Contents

substances or petroleum products or the failure to properly remediate contamination may adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or lease an affected property. In addition, some environmental laws create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with a contamination.

     Our leases require our tenants to operate the properties in compliance with environmental laws and to indemnify us against environmental liability arising from the operation of the properties. We believe all of our properties are in material compliance with environmental laws. However, we could be subject to strict liability under environmental laws because we own the properties. There is also a risk that tenants may not satisfy their environmental compliance and indemnification obligations under the leases. Any of these events could substantially increase our cost of operations, require us to fund environmental indemnities in favor of our secured lenders and reduce our ability to service our secured debt and pay dividends to stockholders and any debt security interest payments. Environmental problems at any properties could also put us in default under loans secured by those properties, as well as loans secured by unaffected properties.

     Tax Risks

     We will be subject to increased taxation if we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. A REIT generally is not taxed at the corporate level on income it distributes to its stockholders, as long as it distributes annually at lease 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. We have not requested and do not plan to request, a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that we qualify as a REIT.

     If we fail to qualify as a REIT we will face tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for payment of dividends:

	•		We would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates.
	•		We could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes.
	•		Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be treated as a REIT for four taxable years following the year in which we were disqualified.

In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will no longer be required to pay dividends (other than any mandatory dividends on any preferred shares we may offer). As a result of these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely effect the market price for our common stock.

     Excessive non-real estate asset values may jeopardize our REIT status. In order to qualify as a REIT, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of investments in real estate, investments in other REITs, cash and cash equivalents, and government securities. Therefore, the value of any property that is not considered a real estate asset for federal income tax purposes must represent in the aggregate less than 25% of our total assets. In addition, under federal income tax law, we may not own securities in any one company (other than a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary or a taxable REIT subsidiary) which represent

Table of Contents

in excess of 10% of the voting securities or 10% of the value of all securities of any one company, or which have, in the aggregate, a value in excess of 5% of our total assets, and we may not own securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries which have, in the aggregate, a value in excess of 20% of our total assets. We may invest in securities of another REIT, and our investment may represent in excess of 10% of the voting securities or 10% of the value of the securities of the other REIT. If the other REIT were to lose its REIT status during a taxable year in which our investment represented in excess of 10% of the voting securities or 10% of the value of the securities of the other REIT as of the close of a calendar quarter, we will lose our REIT status.

     The 25%, 20%, 10% and 5% tests are determined at the end of each calendar quarter. If we fail to meet any such test at the end of any calendar quarter, we will cease to qualify as a REIT.

     We may have to borrow funds or sell assets to meet our distribution requirements. Subject to some adjustments that are unique to REITs, a REIT generally must distribute 90% of its taxable income. For the purpose of determining taxable income, we may be required to accrue interest, rent and other items treated as earned for tax purposes but that we have not yet received. In addition, we may be required not to accrue as expenses for tax purposes some items which actually have been paid or some of our deductions might be disallowed by the Internal Revenue Service. As a result, we could have taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. If this occurs, we may have to borrow funds or liquidate some of our assets in order to meet the distribution requirement applicable to a REIT.

     We may be subject to other tax liabilities. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income and property that could reduce operating cash flow.

     Changes in tax laws may prevent us from qualifying as a REIT. As we have previously described, we intend to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. However, this intended qualification is based on the tax laws that are currently in effect. We are unable to predict any future changes in the tax laws that would adversely affect our status as a REIT. If there is a change in the tax laws that prevents us from qualifying as a REIT or that requires REITs generally to pay corporate level income taxes, we may not be able to make the same level of distributions to our stockholders.

Major Tenants

     As of December 31, 2003, approximately 67% of our gross leasable area, including the Joint Venture Properties, was leased to Borders, Kmart and Walgreen and approximately 67% of total annualized base rents was attributable to these tenants. At December 31, 2003, Borders occupied approximately 28% of our gross leasable area, including the joint venture properties, and accounted for approximately 33% of the annualized base rent. At December 31, 2003, Walgreen Co. occupied approximately 5% of our gross leasable area, including the joint venture properties, and accounted for approximately 17% of the annualized base rent. At December 31, 2003, Kmart Corporation occupied approximately 33% of our gross leasable area, including the joint venture properties, and accounted for approximately 17% of the annualized base rent. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of gross leasable area or annualized base rent in 2003. The loss of any of these anchor tenants

Table of Contents

or the inability of any of them to pay rent would have an adverse effect on our business.

Tax Status

     We have operated and intend to operate in a manner to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, we must, among other things, distribute at least 90% of our real estate investment trust income and meet certain other asset and income tests. Additionally, our charter limits ownership of the Company, directly or constructively, by any single person to 9.8% of the total number of outstanding shares, subject to certain exceptions. As a REIT, we are not subject to federal income tax with respect to that portion of its income that meets certain criteria and is distributed annually to the stockholders.

Competition

     We face competition in seeking properties for acquisition and tenants who will lease space in these properties from insurance companies, credit companies, pension funds, private individuals, investment companies and other REITs, many of which have greater financial and other resources than us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete with such entities in our development, acquisition and leasing activities in the future.

Potential Environmental Risks

     Investments in real property create a potential for environmental liability on the part of the owner or operator of such real property. If hazardous substances are discovered on or emanating from a property, the owner or operator of the property may be held strictly liable for all costs and liabilities relating to such hazardous substances. We have obtained a Phase I environmental study (which involves inspection without soil sampling or ground water analysis) conducted on each Property by independent environmental consultants. Furthermore, we have adopted a policy of conducting a Phase I environmental study on each property we acquire and if necessary conducting additional investigation as warranted.

     We conducted Phase I environmental studies on the two properties we developed and the one property we acquired in 2003. The results of these Phase I studies required the Company to perform a Limited Phase II environmental site assessment on 2 of the properties (which involves soil sampling or ground water analysis). The results of the Phase II environmental study conducted on the properties indicated that no further action was required. In addition, we have no knowledge of any hazardous substances existing on any of its properties in violation of any applicable laws; however, no assurance can be given that such substances are not located on any of the properties. We carry no insurance coverage for the types of environmental risks described above.

     We believe that we are in compliance, in all material respects, with all federal, state and local ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, we have not been notified by any governmental authority of any noncompliance, liability or other claim in connection with any of the properties.

Employees

Table of Contents

     As of February 29, 2004, we employed eight persons. Employee responsibilities include accounting, construction, leasing, property coordination and administrative functions for the properties. Our employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.

Financial Information About Industry Segments

     We are in the business of development, acquisition and management of freestanding net leased properties and community shopping centers. We consider our activities to consist of a single industry segment. See the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain information required in Item 1.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

     Our properties consist of 37 freestanding net leased properties and 13 community shopping centers, that as of December 31, 2003 were 97% leased, with a weighted average lease term of 11.9 years. Approximately 88% of our base rental income was attributable to national retailers. Among these retailers are Borders, Walgreen and Kmart which, at December 31, 2003, collectively represented approximately 67% of our current base rental income. A majority of our properties were built for or are leased to national tenants who require a high quality location with strong retail characteristics. We developed 31 of our 37 freestanding properties and all 13 of our community shopping center properties. Five of our freestanding properties, although not built by us, were acquired as part of our relationship with Borders. Properties we have developed (including our community shopping centers) account for 89.3% of our contractual rent for 2004. Our 37 freestanding properties are comprised of 36 retail locations and Borders’ corporate headquarters.

     A substantial portion of our income consists of rent received under net leases. Most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals monthly in advance and for the payment by tenants of a pro rata share of the real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and common area maintenance of the shopping center as well as payment to us of a percentage of the tenant’s sales. We received percentage rents of $185,620, $247,994 and $413,058 for the fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and these amounts represented 0.7%, 1.0% and 1.8%, respectively, of our total revenue for these periods. Included in those amounts were percentage rents from Kmart of $106,282, $162,419 and $235,894 for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Leases with Borders do not contain percentage rent provisions. Leases with Walgreen do contain percentage rent provisions; however no percentage rent was received from Walgreen during these periods. Some of our leases require us to make roof and structural repairs, as needed.

Major Tenants

     The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our major tenants:

(1)

Includes our percentage of base rent for each of the Joint Venture Properties

Table of Contents

     Borders Group, Inc., (Borders), is a FORTUNE 500 company that trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BGP”. Borders, is a leading global retailer of books, music, movies and other information and entertainment items. Headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Borders operates over 445 Borders Books and Music stores in the United States, as well as 37 international Borders stores, approximately 750 Waldenbooks locations and 36 Great Britain based Books etc. stores. BGI employs more than 32,000 people worldwide. We derived approximately 33% of our base rental income for the year ended December 31, 2003 from, and approximately 39% of our future minimum rentals are attributable to Borders. Borders has reported that its annual revenues for its 2002 fiscal year ended January 26, 2003 were $3,513,000,000 and its annual net income for 2002 was $111,700,000 and that it had total stockholders’ equity of $1,030,600,000. Borders posted revenues of approximately $3.4 billion in fiscal 2002.

     Walgreen is a leader of the U.S. chain drugstore industry and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WAG”. It operates over 4,290 stores in 44 states and Puerto Rico and has total assets of approximately $11.4 billion as of August 31, 2003. As of January 22, 2004, Walgreen had a Standard and Poor’s rating of A+ and a Moody’s rating of Aa3. We derived approximately 17% of our base rental income for the year ended December 31, 2003 from, and approximately 26% of our future minimum rentals are attributable to Walgreen. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, Walgreen reported that its annual net sales were $32,505,000,000 and its annual net income was $1,175,700,000 and that it had shareholders’ equity of $7,195,700,000.

     We have fourteen leases with Kmart, a retailer that operates over 1,500 stores following its emergence from bankruptcy proceedings in May 2003 and trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol “KMRT”. Kmart’s principal business is general merchandise retailing through a chain of department stores. We derived approximately 17% of our base rental income for the year ended December 31, 2003 from, and approximately 15% of our future minimum rentals are attributable to, Kmart. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy proceedings, Kmart was relieved of $7,969,000,000 of liabilities. As of October 29, 2003 Kmart had total liabilities of $4,410,000,000 and shareholders equity of $1,707,000,000. All of our Kmart properties are in the “Big K” format and these Kmart properties average 85,000 square feet per property.

     In May 2003 Kmart emerged from the bankruptcy proceeding which it had initiated in January 2002. Pursuant to the confirmed plan of reorganization, Kmart closed approximately 600 of its stores, including one of which was located on our property in Lakeland, Florida. Kmart vacated the premises in Lakeland, Florida in April 2003 and we are actively marketing the space formerly occupied by Kmart. Our annual rent from this property was approximately $480,000 and Kmart’s annual contribution under the lease for real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance was approximately $110,000. Certain tenants in the Lakeland, Florida community shopping center have co-tenancy clauses in their leases which provide either for modification of their rent to be based on gross sales or an option to terminate their lease when the Kmart store closed, if we are unable to obtain a replacement anchor tenant. As of February 29, 2004, none of these tenants have indicated that they will exercise their option to terminate their leases with us. We believe it will take between 9 and 15 months to re-let the Kmart location. In connection with the re-letting the Kmart location, we may have to agree to make capital expenditures with respect to the property. In addition, we have agreed to a rent reduction of $150,000 per year under a Kmart lease for a store in Perrysburg, Ohio. The rent reduction is for a 5-year period.

     The financial information set forth above with respect to Borders, Walgreen and Kmart was derived from the annual reports on Form 10-K filed by Borders and Walgreen with the SEC with respect to their 2002 and 2003 fiscal years and the quarterly report on form 10-Q filed by Kmart with the SEC with respect to the third quarter of 2003. Additional information regarding Borders, Kmart or Walgreen may be found in their respective public filings. These filings can be accessed at www.sec.gov.

Table of Contents

Location of Properties in the Portfolio

Lease Expirations

     The following table shows lease expirations for the next 10 years for our freestanding properties and community shopping centers, assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal options.

(1)

For purposes of this table we have assumed that Borders will enter into a 15 to 20 year lease upon the expiration of each of its leases on our two joint venture properties

     We have made preliminary contact with the tenants whose leases expire in 2004. Six (6) tenants, at their option have the right to extend their lease term; four (4) tenants’ leases expire in 2004 and we expect to negotiate lease extensions; one (1) tenant has a month to month lease arrangement; and one (1) tenant has elected to terminate its lease. Of the 19 leases that expired in 2003, sixteen (16) tenants extended their lease term; one (1) tenant elected not to extend their lease; and two tenants elected a month to month option.

     Leases on the two Joint Venture Properties are for an initial term through June 20, 2004. At the time that a refinancing of these properties is consummated, Borders is required to enter into a net lease at a fixed lease rate for a term of 15 to 20 years.

Annualized Base Rent of our Properties

     The following is a breakdown of base rents in place at December 31, 2003 for each type of retail tenant:

Table of Contents