Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

Commission file number 1-11607

DTE ENERGY COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Michigan   38-3217752
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or   (I.R.S. Employer
organization)   Identification No.)
     
2000 2nd Avenue, Detroit, Michigan   48226-1279
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

313-235-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered

 
Common Stock, without par value, with contingent
     preferred stock purchase rights
  New York and Chicago Stock Exchanges
     
8.75% Equity Security Units   New York Stock Exchange
     
7.8% Trust Preferred Securities *   New York Stock Exchange


*  
Issued by DTE Energy Trust I. DTE Energy fully and unconditionally guarantees the payments of all amounts due on these securities to the extent DTE Energy Trust I has funds available for payment of such distributions.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]       No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [X]    No [  ]

Based on the closing price on June 30, 2003, our most recently completed second quarter, the aggregate market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates was $6.2 billion.

At January 31, 2004, 168,849,506 shares of DTE Energy’s Common Stock, substantially all held by non-affiliates, were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information in DTE Energy Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Common Shareholders to be held April 29, 2004, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this report on Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference to Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Form 10-K.



 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Definitions
Forward-Looking Statements
Part I
Items 1. & 2. Business & Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures
Exhibit Index
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification
Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification
Chief Executive Officer Section 906 Certification
Chief Financial Officer Section 906 Certification


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company

Annual Report on Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2003

Table of Contents

                           
                      Page
                     
Definitions
                    2  
Forward-Looking Statements
                    4  
Part I
                       
 
Items 1. & 2.
          Business & Properties     5  
 
Item 3.
          Legal Proceedings     26  
 
Item 4.
          Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     26  
Part II
                       
 
Item 5.
          Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related        
 
          Stockholder Matters     27  
 
Item 6.
          Selected Financial Data     28  
 
Item 7.
          Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial        
 
          Condition and Results of Operations     29  
 
Item 7A.
          Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     54  
 
Item 8.
          Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     56  
 
Item 9.
          Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on        
 
          Accounting and Financial Disclosure     114  
 
Item 9A.
          Controls and Procedures     114  
Part III
                       
 
Item 10.
          Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant     114  
 
Item 11.
          Executive Compensation     114  
 
Item 12.
          Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
    114  
 
Item 13.
          Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     114  
 
Item 14.
          Principal Accountant Fees and Services     114  
Part IV
                       
 
Item 15.
          Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K     115  
Signatures
                    120  

1


Table of Contents

Definitions
     
Company  
DTE Energy Company and subsidiary companies
     
Coke and Coke Battery  
Raw coal is heated to high temperatures in ovens to drive off impurities, leaving a carbon residue called coke. Coke is combined with iron ore to create a high metallic iron that is used to produce steel. A series of coke ovens configured in a module is referred to as a battery.
     
Customer Choice  
Choice programs are statewide initiatives giving customers in Michigan the option to choose alternative suppliers for electricity and gas.
     
Detroit Edison  
The Detroit Edison Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of DTE Energy Company) and subsidiary companies
     
Distributed Generation  
Electric energy produced at or close to the point of use, in contrast to central station generation that generally produces electricity at large power plants and transmits and distributes power over long distances. Distributed generation includes fuel cells, small gas turbine engines called micro- and mini-turbines, and other devices capable of producing up to two megawatts of power.
     
DTE Energy  
DTE Energy Company, the parent of Detroit Edison and Enterprises
     
Enterprises  
DTE Enterprises Inc. (successor to MCN Energy) and subsidiary companies
     
EPA   United States Environmental Protection Agency
     
FERC   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
     
GCR  
A gas cost recovery mechanism authorized by the MPSC that was reinstated by MichCon in January 2002, permitting MichCon to pass the cost of natural gas to its customers.
     
ITC  
International Transmission Company (until February 28, 2003, a wholly owned subsidiary of DTE Energy Company)
     
MCN Energy  
MCN Energy Group Inc. and subsidiary companies that were merged into Enterprises
     
MichCon  
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company and subsidiary companies
     
MPSC   Michigan Public Service Commission
     
Non-regulated Subsidiary  
A subsidiary whose conditions of service, prices of goods and services and other operating related matters are not regulated by the MPSC or the FERC
     
NRC   Nuclear Regulatory Commission
     
PSCR  
A power supply cost recovery mechanism authorized by the MPSC that allowed Detroit Edison to recover through rates its fuel, fuel-related and purchased power expenses. The clause was suspended under Michigan’s restructuring legislation signed into law June 5, 2000, which lowered and froze electric customer rates. The clause was reinstated by the MPSC effective January 1, 2004.
     
Section 29 tax credits  
Tax credits as authorized under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code that are designed to stimulate investment in and development of alternate fuel sources.

2


Table of Contents

     
Securitization  
Detroit Edison financed specific stranded costs at lower interest rates through the sale of rate reduction bonds by a wholly owned special purpose entity, the Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC.
     
SFAS   Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
     
Stranded Costs  
Costs incurred by utilities in order to serve customers in a regulated environment that are not expected to be recoverable if customers switch to alternative suppliers of electricity and gas.
     
Synfuels  
The fuel produced through a process involving chemically modifying and binding particles of coal. Synfuels are used for power generation and coke production.
     
Units of Measurement    
     
Bcf   Billion cubic feet of gas
     
Bcfe  
Conversion metric of natural gas, the ratio as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission of 6 Mcf of gas to 1 barrel of oil.
     
gWh   Gigawatthour of electricity
     
kWh   Kilowatthour of electricity
     
Mcf   Thousand cubic feet of gas
     
MMcf   Million cubic feet of gas
     
MW   Megawatt of electricity
     
MWh   Megawatthour of electricity

3


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information presented herein includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual future results to differ materially from those contemplated, projected, estimated or budgeted in such forward-looking statements. There are many factors that may impact forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, the following:

  the effects of weather and other natural phenomena on operations and sales to customers;
 
  economic climate and growth in the geographic areas where we do business;
 
  environmental issues, including changes in the climate, and regulations;
 
  nuclear regulations and risks associated with nuclear operations;
 
  ability to utilize Section 29 tax credits or sell interests in facilities producing such credits;
 
  implementation of electric and gas Customer Choice programs;
 
  implementation of electric and gas utility restructuring in Michigan;
 
  employee relations;
 
  unplanned outages;
 
  access to capital markets and capital market conditions and other financing efforts which can be affected by credit agency ratings;
 
  the timing and extent of changes in interest rates;
 
  the level of borrowings;
 
  changes in the cost of fuel, purchased power and natural gas;
 
  effects of competition;
 
  impact of FERC and MPSC proceedings and regulations;
 
  contributions to earnings by non-regulated businesses;
 
  changes in federal or state tax laws and their interpretations, including the code, regulations, rulings, court proceedings and audits;
 
  ability to recover costs through rate increases;
 
  insurance;
 
  the cost of protecting assets against or damage due to terrorism; and
 
  changes in accounting standards and financial reporting regulations.

New factors emerge from time to time. We cannot predict what factors may arise or how such factors may cause our results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

4


Table of Contents

Part I

Items 1. & 2. Business & Properties

GENERAL

In 1995, DTE Energy incorporated in the state of Michigan. Our regulated operations consist primarily of Detroit Edison and MichCon. We also have numerous non-regulated subsidiaries engaged in energy marketing and trading, energy services, and various other electricity, coal and gas related businesses. DTE Energy is an exempt holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA) of 1935, except Section 9 (a) (2) that relates to the acquisition of securities of public utility companies and Section 33 that relates to the acquisition of foreign (non-U.S.) utility companies.

Detroit Edison is a Michigan corporation organized in 1903. Detroit Edison is a public utility subject to regulation by the MPSC and FERC and is engaged in the generation, purchase, distribution and sale of electric energy to 2.1 million customers in a 7,600 square mile area in southeastern Michigan.

MichCon is a Michigan corporation organized in 1898. MichCon became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of DTE Energy in conjunction with the acquisition of MCN Energy (which was subsequently merged into Enterprises), which was completed on May 31, 2001. See Note 3 for a further discussion of the MCN Energy acquisition. MichCon is a public utility subject to regulation by the MPSC. MichCon is engaged in the purchase, storage, transmission, distribution and sale of natural gas to 1.2 million customers in a 14,700 square mile area throughout Michigan.

In February 2003, we sold the International Transmission Company (ITC), a FERC regulated transmission company. See Note 3 for a further discussion of the ITC sale and its presentation as a discontinued operation.

Our website is www.dteenergy.com. Available free of charge on our website is information such as previously filed reports with the SEC, press releases and other informational resources regarding DTE Energy and our subsidiaries. The information on our website is updated as soon as reasonably practicable. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Form 10-K or any other filing we make with the SEC. Additionally, our previously filed reports and statements are also available at the SEC’s website: www.sec.gov.

References in this report to “we,” “us”, “our” or “Company” are to DTE Energy and its subsidiaries, collectively.

5


Table of Contents

We operate our businesses through three strategic business units (Energy Resources, Energy Distribution and Energy Gas). The balance of our business consists of Corporate & Other. Based on this structure, we set strategic goals, allocate resources and evaluate performance. Each business unit has regulated and non-regulated operations, and contributed to DTE Energy’s 2003 diluted earnings per share of $3.09. See Note 16 - Segment and Related Information, for financial information by segment for the last three years. A discussion of each business follows.

(FLOW CHART)

ENERGY RESOURCES

Power Generation

Description

Power Generation comprises our regulated power generation business and plants within Detroit Edison. These plants are regulated by numerous federal and state governmental agencies, including the MPSC, the NRC and the EPA. Electricity is generated from Detroit Edison’s numerous fossil plants, its hydroelectric pumped storage plant and its nuclear plant, and purchased from electricity generators, suppliers and wholesalers. The electricity we produce and purchase is sold to four major classes of customers: residential, commercial, industrial and wholesale, principally throughout Michigan, the Midwest and Ontario, Canada.

Weather, economic factors and electricity prices affect sales levels to customers. Our peak load and highest total system sales generally occur during the third quarter of the year driven by air conditioning and other cooling-related demands. Power generation sales are made to a diverse base of customers in both type and number; sales levels are not dependent on any small market segment. However, due to residential rate subsidization, less than 1% of the customers constitute approximately 80% of the power

6


Table of Contents

generation margin. Additionally, business customers who have elected to participate in the electric Customer Choice program are having a significant unfavorable effect on our financial performance.

Our power is generated from a variety of fuels and is supplemented with market purchases. The table below details our energy supply mix and average cost per unit:

                                                     
    2003   2002   2001
(in Thousands of MWh)  
 
 
Power Generated and Purchased
                                               
Power Plant Generation
                                               
 
Fossil
                                               
   
Coal
    37,408       71 %     37,381       64 %     38,424       69 %
   
Natural Gas & Other
    644       1       1,636       3       1,287       2  
 
Nuclear (Fermi 2)
    8,114       16       9,301       16       8,555       16  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
    46,166       88       48,318       83       48,266       87  
Purchased Power
    6,354       12       9,807       17       7,482       13  
 
   
     
     
             
         
System Output
    52,520       100 %     58,125       100 %     55,748       100 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Average Unit Cost ($/MWh)
                                               
Generation (1)
  $ 12.89             $ 12.53             $ 12.31          
 
   
             
             
         
Purchased Power (2)
  $ 41.73             $ 39.16             $ 78.24          
 
   
             
             
         
Overall Average Unit Cost
  $ 16.38             $ 17.02             $ 21.15          
 
   
             
             
         


(1)   Represents fuel costs associated with power plants.
 
(2)   Includes amounts associated with hedging activities.

We expect an adequate supply of fuel and purchased power to meet our obligation to serve customers. The effect of lost sales due the electric Customer Choice program has reduced our need for purchased power and increased our ability to sell power in the wholesale market. We have short and long-term supply contracts for expected fuel and purchased power requirements as detailed in the following table:

                 
    2004
   
Expected Supply   Contracted   Open
   
 
Coal
    79 %     21 %
Natural Gas
    29 %     71 %
Purchased Power
    89 %     11 %

Power Generation’s generating capability is heavily dependent upon coal. The coal is purchased from various sources in different geographic areas under agreements that vary in both pricing and terms. Detroit Edison expects to obtain the majority of its coal requirements through long-term contracts with the balance to be obtained through short-term agreements and spot purchases. Detroit Edison has contracts with three coal suppliers for a total purchase of up to 28 million tons of low-sulfur western coal to be delivered from 2004 through 2008. Detroit Edison also has a contract with a supplier for the purchase of approximately 4 million tons of Appalachian coal to be delivered from 2004 through 2006. These existing long-term coal contracts include provisions for price escalation as well as de-escalation. Given the geographic diversity of supply, Detroit Edison believes it can meet the expected generation requirements. We own and lease a fleet of rail cars and have long-term transportation contracts with companies to provide rail and vessel services for delivery of purchased coal to our generating facilities.

We purchase power from other electricity generators, suppliers and wholesalers. These purchases supplement our generation capability to meet customer demand during peak cycles. For example, when high temperatures occur during the summer we require additional electricity to meet demand. This access to additional power is an efficient and economical way to meet our obligation to customers without increasing capital expenditures to build additional base-load power facilities.

7


Table of Contents

Regulation

Detroit Edison’s Power Generation business is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of various agencies, including the MPSC, FERC and NRC. The MPSC issues orders pertaining to rates, recovery of certain costs, including the costs of generating facilities and regulatory assets, conditions of service, accounting and operating-related matters. Detroit Edison’s MPSC-approved rates charged to customers have historically been designed to allow for the recovery of costs, plus an authorized rate of return on our investments. The FERC regulates Detroit Edison with respect to financing authorization and wholesale electric activities. The NRC has regulatory jurisdiction over all phases of the operation, construction, licensing and decommissioning of Detroit Edison’s Fermi 2 nuclear plant.

Since 1996 there have been several important acts, orders, court rulings and legislative actions in the state of Michigan that affect our Power Generation operations. In 1996, the MPSC began an initiative designed to give all of Michigan’s electric customers access to electricity supplied by other generators and marketers. In 1998, the MPSC authorized the electric Customer Choice program that allowed for a limited number of customers to purchase electricity from suppliers other than their local utility. The local utility would continue to transport the electric supply to the customers’ facilities, thereby retaining distribution margins. The electric Customer Choice program was phased in over a three-year period, with all customers having the option to choose their electric supplier by January 2002.

In 2000, the Michigan Legislature enacted legislation that reduced electric rates by 5% and reaffirmed January 2002 as the date for full implementation of the electric Customer Choice program. This legislation also contained provisions freezing rates through 2003 and preventing rate increases for residential customers through 2005 and for small business customers through 2004. The legislation and an MPSC order issued in 2001 established a methodology to enable Detroit Edison to recover stranded costs related to its generation operations that may not otherwise be recoverable due to electric Customer Choice related lost sales and margins. The legislation also provides for the recovery of the costs associated with the implementation of electric Customer Choice program. The MPSC has determined that these costs be treated as regulatory assets. Additionally, the legislation provides for recovery of costs incurred as a result of changes in taxes, laws and other governmental actions including the Clean Air Act.

Due to MPSC orders issued in 1997 and 1998 that altered the regulatory process in Michigan and provided a plan for transition to electric Customer Choice for the generation business of Detroit Edison, effective December 1998, Detroit Edison’s generation business no longer met the criteria of SFAS No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” Since the June 2000 legislation was enacted into law and with the issuance of subsequent clarifying MPSC orders in 2001 and 2002, rates for retail customers and transition charges for electric Customer Choice customers will be set to recover Detroit Edison’s generation costs. Such costs will be billed and recovered from both retail and choice customers and thus satisfy the criteria of SFAS No. 71. In addition, we have the legislative authority to defer regulatory costs in 2002 and 2003 and to begin recovery of such costs starting in 2004 after the mandated rate freeze expires. The recovery of these costs is dependent on authorization from the MPSC. As a result, we resumed application of SFAS No. 71 for our generation business in the fourth quarter of 2002.

In June 2003, Detroit Edison filed an application with the MPSC for a change in retail electric rates, resumption of the Power Supply Cost Recovery (PSCR) mechanism, and recovery of net stranded costs. Detroit Edison is specifically requesting authority to increase rates by $427 million annually with a three-year phase in as customers’ rate caps expire. In February 2004, the MPSC authorized an interim base rate increase of $248 million annually.

For additional information regarding our regulatory environment, see Note 4 - Regulatory Matters.

8


Table of Contents

Properties

Detroit Edison owns generating properties and facilities that are all located in the state of Michigan. Substantially all the net utility properties of Detroit Edison are subject to the lien of its mortgage. Power Generation plants owned and in service as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:

                                   
              Summer Net        
      Location by   Rated Capability (1) (2)        
      Michigan  
       
Plant Name   County   (MW)   (%)   Year in Service

 
 
 
 
Fossil-fueled Steam-Electric
                       
 
Belle River (3)
  St. Clair     1,026       9.3 %   1984 and 1985
 
Conners Creek
  Wayne     215       1.9     1999    
 
Greenwood
  St. Clair     785       7.1     1979    
 
Harbor Beach
  Huron     103       0.9     1968    
 
Marysville
  St. Clair     84       0.8     1930, 1943 and 1947
 
Monroe (4)
  Monroe     3,045       27.6     1971, 1973 and 1974
 
River Rouge
  Wayne     510       4.6     1957 and 1958
 
St. Clair
  St. Clair     1,415       12.8     1953, 1954, 1959, 1961 and 1969
 
Trenton Channel
  Wayne     730       6.6     1949, 1968 and 1999
 
           
     
         
 
            7,913       71.6          
Oil or Gas-fueled Peaking Units.
  Various     1,102       10.0     1966-1971, 1981 and 1999
Nuclear-fueled Steam-Electric Fermi 2 (5)
  Monroe     1,111       10.1     1988    
Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Ludington (6)
  Mason     917       8.3     1973    
 
           
     
         
 
            11,043       100.0 %        
 
           
     
         


(1)   Summer net rated capabilities of generating units in service are based on periodic load tests and are changed depending on operating experience, the physical condition of units, environmental control limitations and customer requirements for steam, which otherwise would be used for electric generation.
 
(2)   Excludes one oil-fueled unit, St. Clair Unit No. 5 (250 MW), in cold standby status.
 
(3)   The Belle River capability represents Detroit Edison’s entitlement to 81.39% of the capacity and energy of the plant. See Note 6 – Jointly Owned Utility Plant.
 
(4)   The Monroe Power Plant provided 38% of Detroit Edison’s total 2003 power plant generation.
 
(5)   Fermi 2 has a design electrical rating (net) of 1,150 MW.
 
(6)   Represents Detroit Edison’s 49% interest in Ludington with a total capability of 1,872 MW.

Strategy and Competition

We continue to strive to be the preferred electricity supplier in southeast Michigan. We believe that we can accomplish our goal by working with our customers, communities and regulatory agencies to be a reliable low cost supplier of electricity. To control expenses, we optimize our fuel blends thereby taking maximum advantage of low cost, environmentally friendly low-sulfur western coals. To ensure generation reliability we will continue to make investments in our generating plants that will improve plant availability and improve operating efficiencies. Revenues from year to year will vary due to weather conditions, economic factors, regulatory events and other risk factors as discussed in the “Risk Factors” section that follows.

Effective January 1, 2002, the electric Customer Choice program expanded in Michigan whereby all of the Company’s electric customers can choose to purchase their electricity from alternative suppliers of generation services. Detroit Edison lost 16% of retail sales in 2003 and 6% of such sales in 2002 as a result of customers choosing to purchase power from alternative suppliers under the electric Customer Choice program. If regulatory or legislative changes are not made, we expect to lose between 17% to 20% of retail sales in 2004 as a result of customers choosing to participate in the program. Customers participating in the electric Customer Choice program consist primarily of industrial and large

9


Table of Contents

commercial customers. There is a significant price difference in the wholesale and retail markets, which only allows for partial offset of the lost revenue from customer choice migration. We will continue to aggressively utilize the wholesale market to sell the generation made available by the electric Customer Choice program.

Energy Services

Description

Non-regulated Energy Services has three business lines: Coal-Based Fuels, On-Site Energy Projects and Merchant Generation.

Coal-Based Fuels

Coal-Based Fuels operations include producing synthetic fuel from nine synfuel plants and producing coke from three coke battery plants. Both processes generate tax credits under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 29 is designed to stimulate investment in and development of alternate fuel sources. We have private letter rulings from the IRS for all of our synfuel plants. Synfuel-related Section 29 tax credits expire in 2007. Section 29 tax credits for two of our three coke batteries expired at the end of 2002 with the third expiring in 2007.

The synthetic fuel process involves chemically modifying and binding particles of coal to produce a fuel that is used for power generation and coke production. The modification involves a three-step process that produces a solid synthetic fuel product. During 2002, we sold a 95% interest in two of our synfuel plants, and in 2003, we sold a 99% interest in one of our synfuel plants and a 59% interest in two other plants. In January 2004, we sold an additional 40% interest in two of the previously sold plants, reducing our interest to 1%. We continue to consolidate these projects due to our controlling influence.

The coke battery facilities produce coke that is used in blast furnaces within the steel industry. DTE Energy is one of the largest producers in the U.S. of coke for the steel industry. During 2001, we sold a 49% interest in two of our coke battery projects, and in 2002, consistent with the original purchase and sale agreement, our third coke battery project interest was reduced from 95% to 5%.

                             
    2003   2002   2001
(Dollars in Millions)  
 
 
Coal-Based Fuels Statistics
                       
 
Synfuel Plants:
                       
   
Operational
    9       9       5  
   
Tax Credits Generated (1)
  $ 227.7     $ 180.2     $ 64.1  
 
Coke Battery Plants:
                       
   
Operational
    3       3