Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K

     
(Mark One)
   
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
 
or
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-10218


Collins & Aikman Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware
  13-3489233
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

250 Stephenson Highway

Troy, Michigan 48083
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(248) 824-2500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered


Common Stock, $.01 par value
  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ  No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes þ  No o.

     The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $168,443,079 as of March 18, 2003.

     As of February 28, 2003, the number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, was 83,630,087 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

     The information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12 and 13) is incorporated by reference to portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2002.

WEBSITE ACCESS TO COMPANY’S REPORTS:

     Collins and Aikman’s internet website address is www.collinsaikman.com. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendment to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through the Company’s website and as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Controls and Procedures
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
SCHEDULE I -- CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
First Amendment to the Credit Agreement
Computation of Earnings Per Share
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Powers of Attorney
906 Certification of CEO/CFO


Table of Contents

COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT INDEX

             
Page

Item 1.
  Business     7  
Item 2.
  Properties     16  
Item 3.
  Legal Proceedings     16  
Item 4.
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     19  
Item 5.
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     19  
Item 6.
  Selected Financial Data     20  
Item 7.
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     21  
Item 7A.
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     40  
Item 8.
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     41  
Item 9.
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     41  
Item 10.
  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant     42  
Item 11.
  Executive Compensation     42  
Item 12.
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     42  
Item 13.
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     42  
Item 14.
  Controls and Procedures     42  
Item 15.
  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K     44  

i


Table of Contents

PART I

      This Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking” information, as that term is defined by the federal securities laws, about our financial condition, results of operations and business. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “should,” “continue,” “predict,” and similar words used in this Annual Report. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the federal securities laws.

      These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties (including trade relations and competition). Because the statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on the statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report.

      The cautionary statements set forth above should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that Collins and Aikman, Corporation (the Company) or persons acting on its behalf may issue. The Company does not undertake any obligation to review or confirm analysts’ expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

      This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results and events may differ materially from those that are anticipated because of certain risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates and industry based factors such as:

Demand in the automotive industry is significantly dependent on the U.S. and the global economies and the Company’s business and profitability are exposed to current and future uncertainties.

      The Company’s financial performance depends, in large part, on conditions in the global automotive markets and, generally, on the U.S. and global economies. Demand in the automotive industry fluctuates in response to overall economic conditions and is particularly sensitive to changes in interest rate levels, consumer confidence and fuel costs. The threat or act of terrorism and war, the recession and other recent developments adversely affected consumer confidence throughout the U.S. and much of the world and exacerbated the uncertainty in the Company’s markets. The future impact on us is difficult to predict. We would be harmed by any sustained weakness in demand or continued downturn in the economy.

      The Company’s sales are impacted by retail inventory levels and production schedules. In 2002, Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) customers continued to significantly reduce their production and inventory levels due to the uncertain economic environment. In the current environment, it is extremely difficult to predict future production rates and inventory levels and the sustainability of any recovery.

The base of customers which the Company serves is concentrated, and the loss of business from a major customer or the discontinuation of particular vehicle models could reduce the Company’s sales and harm the Company’s profitability.

      Because of the relative importance of a few large customers and the high degree of concentration of OEMs in the automotive industry, the Company’s business is exposed to a high degree of risk related to customer concentration. DaimlerChrysler AG, General Motors Corporation and Ford Motor Company and their respective affiliates were the Company’s three largest customers and they directly or indirectly accounted for approximately 31%, 23% and 23% of the Company’s 2002 net sales, respectively. A loss of significant business from, or adverse performance by, any of these customers would be harmful to the Company’s profitability. Although the Company receives purchase orders from most of the Company’s customers, these purchase orders typically provide for the supply of a customer’s annual requirements for a particular model or assembly plant, renewable on a year-to-year basis, rather than for the purchase of a specific quantity of products. It is difficult to accurately predict the level of new production for 2003 car sales. The loss of business with respect to significant vehicle models could have a material adverse effect.

2


Table of Contents

      In addition, there is substantial and continuing pressure from automotive manufacturers to reduce costs, including costs associated with outside suppliers like Collins and Aikman. For example, OEM customers in the automotive industry attempted to impose price decreases and givebacks throughout 2002. Such attempted price decreases were generally in the 3% to 8% range. Several reductions have been agreed to, and others are currently being negotiated with OEMs and pressures may increase if overall economic and industry conditions do not improve. It is difficult for the Company to offset downward pricing pressures through alternative, less costly sources of raw materials. In addition, throughout 2002, the Company has experienced pricing pressure from its suppliers. The Company cannot assure that it will not be materially and adversely affected by substantial and continuing pricing pressures.

The prices that the Company can charge some of the Company’s customers are predetermined and the Company bears the risk of costs in excess of its estimates.

      Sales contracts with some of the Company’s customers require it to provide its products at predetermined prices. In some cases, these prices decline over the course of the contract. The costs that the Company incurs in fulfilling these contracts may vary substantially from its initial estimates. Unanticipated cost increases may occur as a result of several factors, including increases in the costs of labor, components or materials. In some cases, the Company may be permitted to pass on cost increases associated with specific materials to its customers. Cost overruns that the Company cannot pass on to its customers could have a material adverse effect.

The Company may not be able to successfully integrate the Company’s acquired operations or realize the intended benefits of the Company’s acquisitions.

      The Company’s future operations and cash flow will depend largely upon its ability to integrate acquisitions, achieve the strategic operating objectives for these acquisitions and realize significant synergies and cost savings as a result. Acquisitions since January 2001 account for 50 of the Company’s 115 plants and facilities and approximately 50% of the Company’s approximately 25,000 employees. The Textron Automotive Company’s Trim division (TAC-Trim) acquisition in 2001 individually accounted for 41 of the Company’s plants and facilities and approximately 12,000 of the Company’s employees located across seven different countries, including two countries where the Company did not previously operate. The Company has not previously undertaken an integration process as large or complex as the integration plans required by these recent acquisitions collectively or by the TAC-Trim acquisition individually. In order to succeed, the Company will need to realize projected synergies and cost savings on a timely basis, consolidate information technologies, capitalize on the Company’s increased purchasing power, effectively control the progress of the Company’s integration process and associated costs, consolidate the Company’s program management, research and development and engineering operations; capitalize on the Company’s prime contractor strategy and the opportunities afforded by the Company’s broader products offering; and maintain strong relationships with Tier I integrators and OEMs.

      To the extent the Company has misjudged the nature and extent of industry trends or its competition, it may have difficulty in achieving its operating and strategic objectives. In addition, the Company’s integration activities will place substantial demands on its management, operational resources and financial and internal control systems. The Company’s future operating results will depend upon the Company’s ability to implement and improve its operating and financial controls and to combine, train and manage the Company’s employee base. There is a risk that the diversion of management attention, particularly in a difficult operating environment, will affect sales and the attention that management can devote to this and other operational, financial and strategic issues. In addition, in some of the Company’s past non-U.S. acquisitions, the Company has encountered integration and systems difficulties typical of foreign transactions, which have given rise to material weaknesses that had to be subsequently corrected. The Company cannot assure you that it will not encounter similar difficulties going forward. All statements concerning the benefits, cost savings and synergies the Company expects to realize from its acquisitions are forward-looking statements.

3


Table of Contents

The Company may pursue additional acquisitions that further the Company’s current strategies.

      The Company may selectively identify and acquire other businesses with complementary products, manufacturing capabilities or geographic markets and the Company expects to continually evaluate such opportunities. The Company cannot assure you that any business acquired will be successfully integrated with other operations or prove to be complementary in the manner expected or profitable. The Company could incur further indebtedness in connection with the Company’s acquisition strategy and increase the Company’s leverage. Acquisitions outside of North America may present unique difficulties and increase the Company’s exposure to the risks attendant to international operations. The process of integrating acquired companies and operations into the Company’s existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations.

The Company may incur unanticipated contingent liabilities as a result of acquisitions and may experience unanticipated liabilities associated with former discontinued operations.

      The Company may incur unforeseen environmental, tax, pension, litigation or other liabilities in connection with the Company’s recent or future acquisitions or the Company may underestimate the known liabilities. If such liabilities materialize or are greater than the Company estimates, they could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the Company has significant responsibilities related to some of its formerly owned businesses, or discontinued operations, such as those relating to post-retirement, casualty, environmental, product liability, lease and other matters. Based upon the information presently available and the Company’s insurance coverage, the Company does not believe that any of these liabilities will have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition or results of operations, however, the Company could be incorrect in its assumptions and the extent of those contingent liabilities of which the Company is aware may exceed its expectations and there may be other such liabilities of which the Company presently has no knowledge.

If the Company is unable to meet future capital requirements, the Company’s competitive position may be adversely affected.

      In securing new business, the Company is typically required to expend significant amounts of capital for engineering, development, tooling and other costs. Generally, the Company seeks to recoup these costs through pricing over time, but the Company may be unsuccessful due to competitive pressures and other market constraints or if a customer ceases production of a particular vehicle. While the Company believes that it will be able to fund capital expenditures through cash flow from operations, borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities and sales of receivables under the Company’s receivables facility, there can be no assurance that it will have adequate funds to make all the necessary capital expenditures or that the amount of future capital expenditures will not be materially in excess of its anticipated expenditures.

Recent trends among the Company’s customers will increase competitive pressures in the Company’s businesses.

      In recent years, the competitive environment among suppliers to the vehicle manufacturers in the automotive industry has changed significantly as these manufacturers have sought to outsource more vehicular components, modules and systems and to use on-line auctions in order to obtain further price reductions. In addition, these sectors have experienced substantial consolidation as OEMs have sought to lower costs, improve quality and increasingly purchase complete systems and modules rather than separate components. This consolidation has caused, and its continuation will continue to amplify, the pricing pressures outlined above in the discussion of the concentration of the Company’s customers. The Company’s competitive strategy will be to position ourselves as the prime contractor of choice to both Tier I integrators and OEM assembly plants by supplying a full spectrum of integrated interior trim components. This strategy presents the risk that some of the Company’s customers may be in competition with the Company as well. Furthermore, the trend toward consolidation among automotive parts suppliers is resulting in a smaller number of large suppliers like us who benefit from purchasing and distribution economies of scale. The Company may be

4


Table of Contents

unable to achieve the cost savings and operational improvements expected from the Company’s prime contractor business strategy, which could harm its ability to compete favorably in the future with other larger, consolidated companies.

The Company’s strategy may not succeed if anticipated outsourcing fails to occur due to union considerations.

      Because of the economic benefits inherent in outsourcing to suppliers and the costs associated with reversing a decision to purchase automotive interior systems and components from an outside supplier, automotive manufacturers’ commitments to purchasing automotive interior systems and components from outside suppliers, particularly on a just-in-time basis, are contemplated to increase. However, under the contracts currently in effect in the United States and Canada between each of Ford, General Motors and DaimlerChrysler and the United Auto Workers (“UAW”) and the Canadian Auto Workers (“CAW”), in order for any of such automotive manufacturers to obtain from external sources components that it currently produces, it must first notify the UAW or the CAW of such intention. If the UAW or the CAW objects to the proposed outsourcing, some agreement will have to be reached between the UAW or the CAW and the automotive manufacturer. Factors that will normally be taken into account by the UAW, the CAW and the automotive manufacturer include whether the proposed new supplier is technologically more advanced than the automotive manufacturer, whether the new supplier is unionized, whether cost benefits exist, and whether the automotive manufacturer will be able to reassign union members whose jobs are being displaced to other jobs within the same factories.

The Company’s products are subject to changing technology, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to alternative products introduced by competitors.

      The Company believes that its customers rigorously evaluate their suppliers on the basis of product quality, price competitiveness, technical expertise and development capability, new product innovation, reliability and timeliness of delivery, product design capability, manufacturing expertise, operational flexibility, customer service and overall management. The Company’s success will depend on its ability to continue to meet customers’ changing specifications with respect to these criteria. The Company may, therefore, require significant ongoing and recurring additional capital expenditures and investment in research and development, manufacturing and other areas to remain competitive.

The Company may be subject to work stoppages at its facilities or those of its principal customers, which could seriously impact the profitability of the Company’s business.

      As of December 31, 2002, approximately 57% of the Company’s global work force was unionized. If the Company’s unionized workers were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown in the future, the Company could experience a significant disruption of the Company’s operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Many OEMs and their suppliers have unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slowdowns experienced by OEMs or their suppliers could result in slowdowns or closures of assembly plants where the Company’s products are included in assembled vehicles. Furthermore, organizations responsible for shipping the Company’s customers’ products may be impacted by occasional strikes staged by the unions representing transportation employees. Any interruption in the delivery of the Company’s customers’ products would reduce demand for the Company’s products.

A growing portion of the Company’s revenue may be derived from international sources, which exposes us to additional uncertainty.

      A significant portion of the Company’s 2002 sales were derived from shipments to destinations outside of the United States and Canada. As part of the Company’s business strategy, the Company intends to expand the Company’s international operations and customer base. Sales outside of the U.S. and Canada, particularly sales to emerging markets, are subject to other various risks, including: governmental embargoes or foreign trade restrictions such as antidumping duties; changes in U.S. and foreign governmental regulations; tariffs; fuel duties; other trade barriers; political, economic and social instability; and foreign exchange risk. In

5


Table of Contents

addition, there are tax inefficiencies in repatriating funds from non-U.S. subsidiaries. To the extent such repatriation is necessary for us to meet the Company’s debt service or other obligations, this will adversely affect us. International operations are frequently conducted through joint venture arrangements that can materially limit the Company’s operational and financial control of the business.

The Company may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability and warranty claims that may be brought against us.

      The Company faces an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of its current and formerly manufactured or sold products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. The Company may experience material product liability losses in the future or incur significant costs to defend such claims. The Company’s product liability insurance coverage will be inadequate for any liabilities that may ultimately be incurred or may be unavailable on acceptable terms in the future. In addition, if any of the Company’s products are or are alleged to be defective, the Company may be required to participate in a government-required or OEM-instituted recall involving such products. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own policy regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers.

      In addition, as suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with product liability claims. A successful claim brought against us in excess of the Company’s available insurance coverage or a requirement to participate in a product recall may have a material adverse effect.

      In the ordinary course of the Company’s business, contractual disputes over warranties can arise. In the past five years or more, the Company has not been required to make any material payments in respect of warranty claims. In most cases, financial responsibility for warranty costs are contractually retained by the Company’s customer so long as the customers’ specifications are met, but the Company may nonetheless be subjected to requests for cost sharing or pricing adjustments as a part of the Company’s commercial relationship with the customer.

The Company’s business may be materially and adversely affected by compliance obligations and liabilities under environmental laws and regulations.

      The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign environmental, and health and safety, laws and regulations that affect ongoing operations and may increase capital costs and operating expenses in order to maintain compliance with such requirements; and impose liability relating to contamination at the Company’s facilities, and at other locations such as former facilities, facilities where the Company has sent wastes for treatment or disposal, and other properties to which the Company (or a company or business for which the Company is responsible) are linked. See Footnote 21 “Commitments and Contingencies — Environmental”.

The Company may not be able to manage its business as it might otherwise due to its high degree of leverage.

      The Company has indebtedness that is substantial in relation to the Company’s stockholders’ equity and cash flow. At December 31, 2002, the Company had $1,289.2 million of outstanding total debt and short-term borrowings. The Company’s percentage of total debt and outstanding preferred stock of its subsidiary, Products (“Products Preferred Stock”) to total capitalization was 78% at December 31, 2002. The degree to which the Company is leveraged will have important consequences, including the following:

  •  the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, business development efforts or general corporate purposes may be impaired;

6


Table of Contents

  •  a substantial portion of the Company’s cash flow from operations will be dedicated to the payment of interest and principal on the Company’s indebtedness, dividends on Products Preferred Stock, and capital and operating lease expense, thereby reducing the funds available to us for other purposes;
 
  •  the Company’s operations are restricted by the Company’s debt instruments and the terms of the Products Preferred Stock, which contain material financial and operating covenants, and those restrictions will limit, among other things, the Company’s ability to borrow money in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;
 
  •  indebtedness under the Company’s senior credit facilities and the financing cost associated with its receivables facility will be at variable rates of interest, which makes it vulnerable to increases in interest rates;
 
  •  the Company’s leverage may place us at a competitive disadvantage as compared with the Company’s less leveraged competitors and the Company’s leverage will make it more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in general economic conditions or in any of the Company’s businesses; and
 
  •  the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the automotive industry may be limited.

      The Company’s ability to service or refinance, when required, the Products Preferred Stock and the Company’s debt, lease and other obligations will depend principally upon the Company’s future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control.

      In addition, factors more specific to us could cause actual results to vary materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements included in this report such as substantial leverage, limitations imposed by the Company’s debt instruments, the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses including actions it has identified as providing cost saving opportunities, and pursue our prime contractor business strategy, the Company’s customer concentration and risks associated with the formerly owned operations of the Company.

      The Company’s divisions may also be affected by changes in the popularity of particular vehicle models or particular interior trim packages or the loss of programs on particular vehicle models.

      For a discussion of certain of these and other important factors which may affect our operations, products and markets, see “Item 1. — Business” and “Item 7. — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and also our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1.     Business

The Company

      The Company is a global leader in the design, engineering and manufacturing of automotive interior components, including instrument panels, fully assembled cockpit modules, floor and acoustic systems, automotive fabric, interior trim and convertible top systems and has the number one or two North American market share position in seven out of ten major automotive interior categories tracked by CSM Worldwide. The Company is also the largest North American supplier of convertible top systems. The Company expects the fully assembled cockpit modules market to grow significantly over the next five years and has positioned itself as a leading global supplier in this market. Sales are diversified among all North American OEMs, transplants such as Toyota, Honda and Nissan and major Tier I integrators. In North America, the Company manufactures components for approximately 90% of all light vehicle production. The Company has approximately 25,000 employees and more than 115 plants and facilities worldwide. The Company is a Delaware corporation formed on September 21, 1988. The Company conducts all of its operating activities through its wholly owned subsidiary Collins & Aikman Products Co. (“Products”). Predecessors of Products have been in operation since 1843.

7


Table of Contents

      In February 2001, Heartland Industrial Partners, L.P. acquired a controlling interest in the Company. Since the investment, the Company has pursued acquisitions that have furthered a strategy of serving as a prime contractor to both Tier I integrators, which are shifting capital and emphasis away from interior components manufacturing and towards electronics and the delivery of fully integrated interior modules, and to OEMs, which continue to increase their outsourcing of complete interior manufacturing. Significant acquisitions include:

  •  On July 3, 2001, the Company acquired the Becker Group, a leading supplier of plastic components to the automotive industry.
 
  •  On September 21, 2001, the Company acquired Joan Automotive Industries, a leading supplier of bodycloth to the automotive industry, and the assets of Joan’s affiliated automotive yarn dyeing operation, Western Avenue Dyers, L.P.
 
  •  On December 20, 2001, the Company acquired TAC-Trim, one of the largest suppliers of instrument panels and fully assembled cockpit modules and a major automotive plastics manufacturer of interior and exterior trim components in North America, Europe and South America.
 
  •  On January 2, 2003, the Company acquired Delphi Corp.’s plastic injection molding plant and related equipment in Logroño, Spain.
 
  •  On January 17, 2003, the Company acquired from Textron the remaining 50% interest in Textron Automotive Holdings (Italy) S.r.L., a joint venture that was formed as part of the TAC-Trim acquisition. The joint venture includes four facilities producing interior and exterior automotive trim components for strategic global customers in the region.

      Collins & Aikman through its recent acquisitions has created one of the industry’s largest and most broadly based manufacturers of automotive interior components, systems and modules. The Company has the capability to supply diverse combinations of stylistically matched, functionally engineered and acoustically integrated interior trim components, systems and modules and markets interior products to customers through a single “global commercial operations” group, which supplies products from three primary categories: plastic components and cockpits, carpet and acoustics and automotive fabrics. In addition, the Company continues to market its convertible top systems through the Dura convertible group.

Industry Trends

      The Company’s strategy is to capitalize on several important automotive industry trends, which are expected to drive demand for its products. These trends include:

  •  Increasing OEM Demand for Modules, Systems and Complete Interiors. To reduce costs and simplify assembly processes and design, OEMs increasingly expect their large-scale suppliers to provide fully engineered systems, pre-assembled combinations of components (systems or modules) and complete automotive interiors rather than individual components. OEMs also continue to increase their need for multiple products on any given assembly line, further driving the need for suppliers to be able to handle extreme complexity.
 
  •  Accelerating Manufacturing Outsourcing by Tier I Total Interior Integrators. The large total interior Tier I integrators are repositioning their assets and resources to focus on electronics design, assembly and “just-in-time” sequencing of modules, systems and complete interiors. As a result, they are seeking to divest or outsource the manufacturing of many component categories.
 
  •  Growing Technological Content and Acoustical Performance Requirements. The electronic and technological content of vehicles continues to expand, largely driven by demand for greater functionality and convenience. Changes to vehicle interiors, including hands-free cell phone systems, entertainment and navigational systems and voice-activated dashboard functions, are expected to require enhanced acoustical properties and increased sound field engineering relative to today’s light vehicles.

8


Table of Contents

  •  Global Customer Requirements. Due to the opportunity for significant cost savings, reduced product development cycle times, common global platforms and improved product quality and consistency, automotive manufacturers favor suppliers with the capability to manufacture automotive interior systems and components in multiple geographic markets.

Corporate Strategy

      The Company’s goal is to become the leading manufacturer of automotive interior trim components to OEMs and Tier I integrators and to realize the integration, synergy and cost savings opportunities created by the combination of Collins & Aikman and its 2001 acquisitions. The Company intends to leverage its product development, patented new materials, continuous enhanced manufacturing capability, an unwavering dedication to lean, error proofing and APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) launch readiness systems to meet customers’ demands. The following are the key elements of the strategy:

  •  Provide integrated product solutions that combine interior styling, component systems and acoustical technologies. The ability to bundle multiple components into integrated, custom packages distinguishes the Company from its competitors and provides an opportunity to increase content per vehicle. The Company is a leader in product innovation, design and styling in all of its business lines, producing components that cover substantially all of the non-glass interior surfaces of automobiles. This breadth of product offering affords the Company a significant advantage as OEMs increasingly view the vehicle interior as a major point of differentiation and rely upon automotive suppliers for research, engineering, design and styling capabilities. By employing a cross-disciplinary approach to acoustics, surface styling and product engineering that takes advantage of product development and technological capabilities, the Company can offer integrated product solutions to its customers.
 
  •  Capitalize on position as prime contractor to OEMs and Tier I total interior integrators. The Company believes that OEMs will accelerate modular and system sourcing in order to lower costs, reduce time to market and accommodate global platforms and that Tier I total interior integrators will increase the redeployment of assets and capital into the integrated design, assembly and “just in time” sequenced delivery of complete interior systems. The Company is well positioned to capitalize on these opportunities. Furthermore, the Company’s products are used in approximately 90% of all North American light vehicle platforms and are sold to all North American OEMs, transplants such as Toyota, Nissan and Honda, and major Tier I integrators. The Company is also well positioned with respect to its Tier II competitors that have comparatively narrower product lines and significantly less size, scale and technological capabilities.
 
  •  Increase content per vehicle. The Company intends to take advantage of its current position to increase content per vehicle and has substantial new business awards from customers across all product categories, with the strongest growth in fully assembled cockpit modules. Projected sales growth is primarily attributable to TAC-Trim’s expanded book of full cockpit programs. By increasing content per vehicle, sales are expected to increase at a rate in excess of changes in industry production rates.
 
  •  Leverage technology to improve manufacturing efficiency. The Company believes it has many opportunities to improve manufacturing efficiency and cost structure by rationalizing existing operations and incorporating manufacturing “best practices,” processes, procedures and technologies into its operations. For example, TAC- Trim is believed to be among the most efficient plastics suppliers in North America and Europe due to numerous proprietary manufacturing technologies, such as InvisitecTM and IntellimoldTM and EnvirosoftTM patented processes that allow the Company to manufacture and combine multiple products to produce complex integrated interiors products. The Company believes the application of technologies such as IntellimoldTM to the Company’s other operations, as well as the continued roll-out of these technologies throughout TAC-Trim’s operations, will significantly improve plastics manufacturing cycle times, labor costs and scrap rates.
 
  •  Pursue cost savings opportunities. The Becker, Joan and TAC-Trim acquisitions created cost savings in the first full year of operation. The Company expects to continue to realize additional savings through a number of initiatives, including purchasing savings, in-sourcing the majority of our plastics

9


Table of Contents

  tooling and yarn dyeing requirements, consolidating research and development and engineering functions, capacity rationalization and reducing global headquarters’ costs. In an effort to achieve cost savings, the Company may also elect to implement restructuring activities in future periods above and beyond activities initiated during 2002.

Segment and Geographical Information

      For a discussion of the Company’s operating segments and the geographic regions in which the Company operates, refer to Item 7 MD&A — “Results of Operations” and to Footnote 20 — “Information About the Company’s Operations.”

Products

      The Company markets the majority of its products to customers through a single “global commercial operations” group, which supplies products from four primary categories: plastic components and cockpits, carpet and acoustics, automotive fabrics, and convertible top systems.

Plastic Components and Cockpits

      The Company manufactures substantially all of the components of the plastic interior trim within a vehicle, including automotive instrument panels, door panels, sidewall trim, overhead systems, headrests and armrests, cupholders, air registers and bezels, slush molded skins, pillar trim, floor console systems, instrument panel components, and fully assembled cockpit modules. This broad portfolio of plastic components and cockpits products allows the Company to offer customers modules and systems that incorporate individual components. Some major products include:

  •  Instrument Panels (“IP”): As the most structurally important plastic component in the vehicle and as the plastic substrate directly in front of the driver, the IP occupies the most important piece of “real estate” in the interior. The Company believes that it is the number one IP supplier in North America. The advanced materials the Company employs include EnvirosoftTM castable thermoplastic materials, high performance PVC alloys, high-definition grain and texture formulation and vacuum forming. The Company also has the proprietary InvisitecTM invisible passenger air bag system, which provides improved appearance and craftsmanship at reduced cost.
 
  •  Cockpits: The Company is a leading North American and European supplier of cockpits. The complete array and breadth of its plastic component offerings has enabled the Company to become a leader in offering customers a fully assembled IP system (“cockpit”) delivered on a just-in-time basis. As most of the ancillary interior trim components revolve around the IP placement, the Company believes that it will be able to penetrate effectively the customer base by offering the IP along with complementary plastic accoutrements and additional products from its other business units. The Company sources various other parts that make up a fully assembled modular cockpit from outside suppliers (including radios, wire harnesses, cross-vehicle beams and steering columns). The Company expects that its position as a cockpit integrator will provide significant opportunities to in-source more manufactured content in the future. Through the proprietary IntelliquenceTM software, finished cockpits can be delivered to the OEMs on a just-in-time basis and installed on the assembly line.
 
  •  Door Panels: The Company believes that it is the second largest supplier of door panels in North America. This decorative plastic interior trim component is an important element to the overall styling theme of a vehicle’s interior.
 
  •  Exteriors: Exterior trim components include plastic molded fascia systems, bodyside cladding, signal lamps, cowl grilles and wheel flares. The Company has taken advantage of the systems trend in the exterior trim product market by producing and assembling fascia with radiator grilles, energy absorbers, trim moldings and lamps to be delivered in sequence directly to the OEMs’ assembly line.

10


Table of Contents

Carpet and Acoustics

      The Company evolved from a North American carpet producer to become a market leader in a broad range of automotive floor systems, luggage compartment trim, dash insulators and other acoustic products with production capabilities in both North America and Europe. While acoustical products are often combined with molded floor carpet to provide complete interior floor systems, it is useful to describe four carpet and acoustics product categories:

  •  Molded Floor Systems: Molded floor systems consist of thermoformed compression molded carpets. These carpets are provided in either a barrier or an absorptive NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) system. The barrier system includes polyethylene, barrier back, and a fiber underlay system or a foam-in-place system. Products include TuflorTM, the Company’s proprietary thermoplastic flooring product, which is rugged, durable and washable. The products in molded floor systems are highly engineered, and their manufacture requires a high degree of precision and draws on the Company’s robotics capabilities. The Company believes it is the number one producer of molded floor and acoustic systems in the North American market and manufactures molded floor systems for all of the North American and Japanese OEMs as well as a number of the European OEMs.
 
  •  Luggage Compartment Trim: The other major carpeted area of the vehicle is the luggage compartment, which includes one-piece molded trunk systems and assemblies, wheelhouse covers and center pan mats, seatbacks, tireboard covers and other trunk trim products. The Company believes that it is the number two supplier of luggage compartment trim in the North American market.
 
  •  Accessory Floormats: The Company manufactures automotive accessory floormats by vulcanizing rubber backing to tufted carpet and also manufactures cargo mats with value-added distinctive aesthetic and practical features such as hand-sewn appearance of edges and moisture trapping construction with our patented Akro Edge® floormats. Largely due to this product differentiation, the Company has become the largest fully integrated auto floormat producer in North America.
 
  •  Acoustical Products: Acoustical products include interior dash insulators that insulate the passenger compartment from engine compartment noise and heat; damping materials that control noise in the floor, overhead system and sides of the vehicle; and engine compartment NVH systems. Changes to vehicle interiors, including hands-free cell phone systems, navigational systems, entertainment systems and voice-activated Internet access, will require enhanced acoustical properties and increased sound field engineering relative to today’s light vehicles.

Automotive Fabrics

      The Company is positioned as the market leader in the North American automotive fabrics market, with the 2001 acquisition and the completed integration of Joan Fabrics automotive business. The principal automotive products include body cloth (woven or knitted fabrics for seating surfaces and other interior applications) and headliner fabric. The Company is able to offer virtually every major weave/knit technology currently available in the marketplace including dobby velours, jacquard velours, flat wovens, double-needlebar knits, circular knits and tricot knits. This allows the Company to effectively serve changing customer styling and cost directives.

      In addition, Joan and other acquisitions have allowed the Company to increase its backward and forward integration levels by adding yarn dye and fabric lamination operations. This additional value-add manufacturing and improved control of the supply chain have contributed to improved operational efficiencies and manufacturing performance.

Dura Convertible Top Systems

      Dura Convertible Systems (DCS) is the only vertically integrated full service supplier of convertible roof systems, which designs, engineers and manufactures all aspects of a convertible top including the framework, trim set, backlights, well slings, tonneau covers and power actuating system. Recently, in order to differentiate products in the marketplace, OEMs have been increasing the number of convertible and open roof derivative

11


Table of Contents

vehicles on both existing and new platforms. The Company’s management believes that this trend will continue to drive demand for convertibles and other innovative open roof systems. DCS is well positioned to secure additional business based upon demonstrated new innovative roof system concepts.

      Top-in-a-BoxTM, a system pioneered by DCS, is an assembly-line-ready module containing all of the components of a convertible top that enables the OEM to install a complete convertible top system on the production line. This modular, “bolt-on” assembly significantly reduces the time and labor traditionally required to manufacture a convertible model, enabling OEMs to more profitably produce and sell convertibles. DCS has the industry’s most complete line of fabric coverings for convertible and sport utility top covers for OEMs globally. The Company maintains final assembly and trim operations near the OEMs’ plants, and thereby offers customers complete just-in-time delivery and sequencing capabilities.

Customers

      Customers include OEMs and Tier I total interior integrators, both of which have been increasingly divesting component manufacturing. OEMs have been typical direct customers for the Company’s plastic components, cockpits, carpet and acoustic and convertible products, while Tier I total interior integrators have typically been direct customers for fabrics and carpet and acoustics.

      Through strategic acquisitions, the Company has broadened its customer base globally, with European and South American sales representing 19% of total sales for 2002 versus 14% in 2001. DaimlerChrylser AG (including Mercedes, Chrysler, Mitsubishi and Smart), General Motors Corporation (including General Motors, Opel, Vauxhall and Saab) and Ford Motor Company (including Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin and Volvo) directly and indirectly represented approximately 31%, 23% and 23% of 2002 sales, respectively. The following is a list of customers:

             
• Alpha Romeo
• Audi
• BMW
• CAMMI
• DaimlerChrysler
• Faurecia
• Fiat
• Ford
• Freightliner
  • General Motors
• Honda
• Intier
• Isuzu
• Jaguar
• Johnson Controls
• Lear Corporation
• Magna
• MAN
  • Mazda
• Mitsubishi
• Nissan
• NUMMI
• Opel
• Porsche
• PSA
• Renault
• Rover
  • Scania
• Seat
• Subaru
• Toyota
• Visteon
• Volkswagen
• Volvo

      The Company’s supply relationships are typically sole-source and extend over the life of the model, which is generally four to seven years, and do not normally require the purchase by the customer of any minimum number of products. The Company receives blanket purchase orders that normally cover annual requirements for products to be supplied for a particular vehicle model which may be terminated at any time. In order to reduce reliance on any one model, the Company produces automotive interior and exterior systems and components for a broad cross-section of both new and more established models.

Marketing, Engineering and Development

      As a global leader in automotive interior and exterior components, the Company differentiates itself in the marketplace by consistently providing high quality products, outstanding customer service and program management, and cost effective automotive solutions to global customers. Historically, the Company marketed individual components, modules and complete systems to customers. The Company has realigned marketing efforts to sell integrated product “bundles” to customers in an effort to increase growth in sales and operating income while enhancing the value-add provided to customers. Central to this marketing strategy has been the development of products that enhance both the vehicles’ interior aesthetics as well as its acoustic performance. Equally important, and unlike many other Tier I or Tier II automotive suppliers, is the development of marketing and program management teams specifically focused on supporting not only OEMs, but major Tier I customers as well. These dedicated teams, consisting of experienced automotive personnel

12


Table of Contents

who are able to meet a customer’s entire needs, provide a single interface for our customers and help avoid duplication of our sales and engineering efforts.

      Products are sold directly to customers under sales contracts that are obtained primarily through competitive bidding. These sales are originated almost entirely by sales staff. This marketing effort is augmented by design and manufacturing engineers that work closely with automotive manufacturers from the preliminary design to the manufacture and supply of automotive modules, systems or components. A key element employed to increase sales is to develop increasingly higher value-added products through innovations in materials construction, product design, engineering and styling. The primary focus of the Global Product Development Division (GPDD), therefore, is to work closely with customer engineering personnel to develop new products, processes, innovations, etc. that are central to winning new business from customers. The Advanced Sales and Program Management Group serves as a “bridge” between the GPDD and customer focused sales groups who market the Company’s products and are responsible for ensuring that customers’ needs are being met.

      Through sales offices in North America, South America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, the Company’s marketing personnel maintain regular contact with their various customers’ engineers and purchasing agents. The Company continually seeks new business from existing customers, as well as developing relationships with new customers. The Company markets its products by maintaining strong customer relationships, developed over an 80-plus year history in the automotive industry through:

  •  extensive technical and product development capabilities;
 
  •  reliable just-in-time delivery of high-quality products;
 
  •  strong customer service;
 
  •  innovative new products; and
 
  •  a competitive cost structure.

      The emergence of modular sourcing favors suppliers with broad manufacturing capabilities and product lines, experience with diverse materials and modular coordination. Management believes that the Company’s broad base of manufacturing expertise with interior surface resins and materials and its global leadership in delivering cockpits, favorably positions the Company in the global automotive interior industry. Automotive manufacturers have increasingly looked to suppliers to assume responsibility for introducing product innovations, shortening the development cycle of new models, decreasing tooling investment and labor costs, reducing the number of costly design changes in the early phases of production and improving automotive interior acoustics, comfort and functionality. Once the Company is engaged to develop the design for the automotive interior system or component of a specific vehicle model, it is also generally engaged to supply these items when the vehicle goes into production. Substantial resources have been dedicated toward improving engineering and technical capabilities, establishing strong in-house tooling capabilities and developing advanced technology centers in the United States and in Europe. Similarly, research and development are an integral part of the sales and marketing effort. Especially noteworthy are the Company’s proprietary IntellimoldTM injection molding control process, InvisitecTM invisible passenger air bag door system and Envirosoft castable TPU (Thermal Plastic Polyurethane) and TPO (Thermal Plastic Olefin) materials.

      In order to effectively develop automotive interior systems, it is necessary to have global capabilities in the engineering, research, design, development and validation of the interior components, systems and modules being produced. The Company conducts research and development at design and technology centers in Dearborn, Michigan; Dover, New Hampshire; Auburn Hills, Michigan; Plymouth, Michigan; Heidelberg, Germany and Tyngsboro, Massachusetts and at several worldwide product engineering centers. At these centers, the Company designs, develops and engineers products to comply with applicable safety standards, meet quality and durability standards, respond to environmental conditions and conform to customer aesthetic and acoustic requirements. In particular, acoustic requirements and cockpit aesthetics have become more important than ever with the advent of in-vehicle telematics. Technologically advanced acoustics testing

13


Table of Contents

centers are maintained in Plymouth, Michigan and Heidelberg, Germany and cockpit development centers are located in Auburn Hills and Dearborn, Michigan in order to capitalize on both of these trends.

Manufacturing

      The Company focuses on combining smaller manufacturing plants into larger scale plants that have efficient layouts and the ability to reduce fixed costs.

      The Company possesses cross-disciplinary manufacturing expertise, including an ability to form and assemble multi-material combinations of hard-molded plastics, slush-molded soft skins and surfaces, carpet, fabric, foam, insulation, and other trim materials as well as stamping, welding, machining and painting of metals and cutting and sewing of fabric components. Management believes the sophistication of the Company’s carpet tufting and dying processes, the foam-in-place process for molded floors and its small-part plastic moldings and assemblies capabilities creates a competitive advantage.

      With the Joan acquisition, the Company gained a scaleable, low-cost package automotive yarn dyeing facility thereby bringing in-house an important source of supply for the manufacture of our fabrics products.

      The acquisition of Becker, originally established as a tool shop, has supplemented existing operations with one of the industry’s leading tool developers allowing the in-sourcing of a significant portion of the Company’s tooling requirements. The addition of Becker’s tooling expertise complemented the Company’s manufacturing capabilities for carpet and acoustics products and TAC-Trim’s large part injection molding process.

      The TAC-Trim acquisition added advanced process technologies such as slush-molded skinning for high-end instrument panels, thermoplastic casting, and “molded-in” color and decoration insert capability and overall manufacturing discipline and acumen. Specific product and process additions brought on by TAC-Trim include: the patented IntellimoldTM feedback control system for injection molding control which dramatically reduces cycle times, labor costs and scrap rates; and the proprietary IntelliquenceTM software sequencing system which should enable product delivery on a just-in-time basis to global OEM customers. In addition, TAC-Trim significantly expands plastic manufacturing capabilities allowing the Company to provide substantially all of an automobile’s interior plastic components.

Technology and Intellectual Property

      Significant resources are dedicated to research and development in order to maintain the position as a leading developer of technology innovations, some of which have been patented or are in the process of being patented, in the automotive interior industry. The Company has developed a number of patented and proprietary designs for innovative interior features, all focused on increasing value to the customer. Examples include the Company developed proprietary slimline cupholders, CavelflexTM (stretch woven) fabrics and the “AcTTM family” of acoustically tunable products.

      Patents and patent applications exist in five primary areas: automotive floor mats, automotive fabric products, acoustics, interiors and convertible systems. With respect to floormats, the Company holds several U.S. and foreign patents relating to the Akro Edge® floormats. Akro Edge® floormats are the industry standard for their functional and aesthetic appeal to OEMs and their customers. With respect to automotive fabric patents, the Company has numerous patents on headliners, trunkliners and floor panels. In the acoustics area, in addition to the proprietary Comet® acoustics software, the Company is actively seeking protection of various aspects of its AcTTM fiber technology and various other means for improving sound deadening and sound absorption in automotive interiors. The Company has various patents and patent applications directed to cup holders, air outlet assemblies, storage systems and convertible mechanisms. The Company owns the patents relating to IntellimoldTM injection molding control process for use in its business. The IntellimoldTM patents are related to methods and/or apparatus for injection molding. The Company also holds technology relating to certain skin materials and compounding solutions that provide the capability to design cost-effective materials with outstanding performance and aesthetic qualities. Examples of these materials include EnvirosoftTM castable thermoplastic materials, high performance PVC alloys, high-definition grain and texture formulation and vacuum thermoplastic applications. The Company also holds technology relating to the

14


Table of Contents

InvisitecTM invisible passenger air bag system, which provides improved appearance and craftsmanship at reduced cost. InvisitecTM systems, which integrate the air bag door with the panel and top cover, have been commercialized for soft-cast and vacuum-formed panels and hard injection molded instrument panels. In total, the Company holds approximately 370 U.S. and approximately 1,400 foreign active patents and has approximately 325 patents pending. The intellectual property acquired in the TAC-Trim Acquisition is subject to certain limitations on the Company’s use and creates continuing obligations to Textron.

      As part of the TAC-Trim acquisition, the Company entered into three intellectual property license agreements with Textron. In two of these agreements, the Company licensed back to Textron certain intellectual property that was acquired in the transaction (the “Intellimold Agreement” and the “Licensed-Back IP Agreement”). In the third agreement, the Company licensed from Textron other intellectual property that it did not acquire in the transaction (the “Retained IP Agreement”). The Company is providing general descriptions of these agreements although these descriptions do not contain all the material terms in the contracts. In all three agreements, the ability to use the intellectual property is limited based on whether the proposed use falls inside or outside a defined field of automotive products (the “Restricted Field”).

      In the Intellimold Agreement, the Company gave Textron an exclusive worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable license to use outside the Restricted Field its rights in the Intellimold process and any enhancements developed by it. Textron was also granted a royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable license to use the Company’s rights in the Intellimold process and any enhancements developed by the Company within the Restricted Field solely in connection with its and certain affiliates’ manufacturing, sales and development operations. The Intellimold Agreement also includes an exclusive royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable license for the Company to use within the Restricted Field any enhancements to the Intellimold process developed by Textron. In the Licensed-Back IP Agreement, the Company granted Textron a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual and irrevocable license to use solely outside the Restricted Field certain intellectual property including over 50 U.S. patents on air bag related products. In the Retained IP Agreement, Textron granted to the Company a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual and irrevocable license to use solely within the Restricted Field certain intellectual property. These patents could have applicability to the automotive industry but such use is somewhat secondary to the use of such technology outside the automotive field.

      As described below under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity — Leases”, the Company leases certain equipment from Textron. When those leases terminate, if Textron and its affiliates continue to own any interest in the equipment, they will be allowed to use the equipment for certain purposes and to use related intellectual property.

Raw Materials

      Raw materials and other supplies used in our continuing operations are normally available from a variety of competing suppliers. With respect to most materials, the loss of a single or even a few suppliers would not have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is sensitive to price movements in its raw materials supply base and has not hedged against price fluctuations in commodity supplies, such as plastics and resins. While the Company may not be able to pass on any future raw materials price increases to customers, a significant portion of increased cost may be offset through volume purchase savings, value engineering/value analysis in conjunction with our major customers and reductions in the cost of off-quality products and processes. The Company may evaluate commodities hedging opportunities from time to time.

Competition

      The Company is a leading supplier in automotive molded carpet and acoustics, auto fabrics, convertible top systems and automotive plastics components and cockpits, within each segment. Customers rigorously evaluate suppliers on the basis of product, quality, price competitiveness, technical expertise and development capability, new product innovation, reliability and timeliness of delivery, product design capability, leanness of facilities, operational flexibility, customer service and overall management. Some competitors may have greater financial resources than the Company or a competitive advantage in the production of any given

15


Table of Contents

product that the Company manufactures, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete in the markets for the products it currently provides.

Joint Ventures

      In January 2003, the Company acquired from Textron the remaining 50% interest in Textron Automotive Holdings (Italy) S.r.L., a joint venture that was formed as part of the TAC-Trim acquisition. Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional discussion regarding this acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in the Italian joint venture.

Labor Matters and Employees

      As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s continuing operations employed approximately 25,000 persons on a full-time or full-time equivalent basis. Approximately 57% of such employees were represented by labor unions in the United States, Canada and other countries. Each facility with represented employees has its own collective bargaining unit and management believes that its relations with employees represented by labor unions and other employees are generally good. From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, grievances are filed against the Company by employees and unions.

Environmental Matters

      A discussion of environmental matters is included in Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 21 “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report.

Item 2.     Properties

      The Company has over 115 plants and facilities in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. Approximately 60% of the over 14 million total square footage of these facilities is owned and the remainder is leased. Many facilities are strategically located to provide product delivery to our customers on a just-in-time basis.

Facilities by Geographic Region

                                         
North South
Type of Facility America America Europe Asia Total






Manufacturing
    52       4       29             85  
Design, Research & Development, and Technical Centers
    19             7             26  
Sales Branches, Offices, Other
    13             5       2       20  
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total(1)
    84       4       41       2       N/A  


(1)  Total facilities shown per the table exceeds the 115 plants and facilities indicated above because certain facilities listed in the table serve in more than one of the indicated capacities.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

      Except as described below, the Company and its subsidiaries are not party to any material pending legal proceedings, but is involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business.

      Environmental: The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign environmental, and health and safety, laws and regulations that (i) affect ongoing operations and may increase capital costs and operating expenses in order to maintain compliance with such requirements and (ii) impose liability relating to contamination at facilities, and at other locations such as former facilities, facilities where we have sent wastes for treatment or disposal, and other properties to which the Company may be linked. Such liability may include, for example, investigation and clean-up of the contamination, personal injury and property damage

16


Table of Contents

caused by the contamination, and damages to natural resources. Some of these liabilities may be imposed without regard to fault, and may also be joint and several (which can result in a liable party being held responsible for the entire obligation, even where other parties are also liable).

      Management believes that it has obtained, and is in material compliance with those material environmental permits and approvals necessary to conduct its various businesses. Environmental compliance costs for continuing businesses are accounted for as normal operating expenses or capital expenditures, except for certain costs incurred at acquired locations. Environmental compliance costs relating to conditions existing at the time of an acquisition are generally charged to reserves established in purchase accounting. The Company accrues for environmental remediation costs when such obligations are known and reasonably estimable. In the opinion of management, based on the facts presently known to it, such environmental compliance and remediation costs will not have a material effect on the business, consolidated financial condition, future results of operations or cash flows.

      The Company is legally or contractually responsible or alleged to be responsible for the investigation and remediation of contamination at various sites, and for personal injury or property damages, if any, associated with such contamination. At some of these sites the Company has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under the federal Superfund law or similar state laws. Other sites at which the Company may be responsible for contamination may be identified in the future, including with respect to divested and acquired businesses.

      The Company is currently engaged in investigating or remediating certain sites as discussed in the paragraphs below. In estimating the cost of investigation and remediation, the Company considered, among other things, its prior experience in remediating contaminated sites, remediation efforts by other parties, data released by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”), the professional judgment of the Company’s environmental experts, outside environmental specialists and other experts, and the likelihood that other identified PRPs will have the financial resources to fulfill their obligations at sites where they and the Company may be jointly and severally liable. It is difficult to estimate the total cost of investigation and remediation due to various factors including: incomplete information regarding particular sites and other PRPs; uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of environmental problems and the Company’s share, if any, of liability for such problems; the ultimate selection among alternative approaches by governmental regulators; the complexity and evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations and governmental directives; and changes in cleanup standards.

      The Company has established accruals for certain contingent environmental liabilities. The Company accrues for environmental investigatory and non-capital remediation costs when litigation has commenced or a claim or assessment has been asserted or is imminent, the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable, and the financial impact of such outcome is reasonably estimable. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, total reserves for those contingent environmental liabilities are approximately $64.5 million and $59.6 million, respectively.

      The Company is a party to a Consent Decree with the State of New Hampshire to remediate a former industrial landfill known as the Cardinal Landfill in Farmington, New Hampshire. Pursuant to that Consent Decree, the Company is currently conducting a pilot test for a proposed remediation of chlorinated compound contaminants in groundwater. The Consent Decree calls for a remedy to be in place by 2004. The Company is a defendant in two lawsuits filed by a total of 91 individual plaintiffs for alleged personal injuries arising from Cardinal Landfill conditions. The Company will vigorously contest these allegations. As of December 31, 2002, the Company has accrued $15.7 million for Cardinal Landfill.

      The Company is a party, as a member of a PRP workgroup, to a Consent Decree entered with the USEPA for the remediation of a former municipal landfill in Dover, New Hampshire. The town of Dover, New Hampshire is also a member of the PRP group and a party to the Consent Decree. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decree, the PRP group is currently engaged in the preparation of a remediation design. The Consent Decree requires that a remedy for the site be in place by 2004. As of December 31, 2002, the Company has accrued $9.6 million for Dover.

17


Table of Contents

      Pursuant to a Consent Decree signed with the USEPA, the Company is currently engaged in a full-scale remediation for groundwater and soil contamination at the former Stamina Mills manufacturing facility in North Smithfield, Rhode Island. Remediation activities have been ongoing since 1998. The Company is also in negotiation with the USEPA regarding a claim for past oversight costs. A resolution of this matter is anticipated in 2003. As of December 31, 2002, the Company has accrued $14.1 million for Stamina Mills.

      The Company is working with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to investigate and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at a former manufacturing plant in Mancelona, MI and at adjacent owned property formerly used for the treatment and disposal of plating waste. MDEQ is likely to require remediation of groundwater. In addition, the Company is incurring costs in connection with the provision of alternate water supplies to residences in the area.

      The current owner of one of the Company’s former manufacturing plants located in Bowling Green, OH has entered into an Administrative Order on Consent with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) requiring investigation and remediation of contamination at the site. The Company is reimbursing the current owner for costs associated with ongoing groundwater monitoring and, following selection of an appropriate remedy by OEPA, will assume 90% of future remediation costs.

      In the 1980’s and 1990’s, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) and other state agencies ordered a predecessor of the Company to investigate and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at a former lumber treatment plant in Elmira, Ca. In 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with the State of California to conduct long-term operation and maintenance of the remedy implemented at the site.

      In the opinion of management, based on information presently known to it, identified environmental costs and contingencies will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, future results of operations or cash flows. However, we can give no assurance that we have identified or properly assessed all potential environmental liability arising from the Company’s business or properties, and those of the Company’s present and former subsidiaries and their corporate predecessors.

      During 2002, the Company received proceeds of $15.8 million on environmental claims related to discontinued operations. Of this amount, $9.5 million was recorded as income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.

      During 2001, the Company received proceeds of $14.5 million on environmental claims related to discontinued operations. Of this amount $8.8 million was recorded as income from discontinued operation