Back to GetFilings.com




                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 10-K


[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001

[  ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ TO ____________

                         Commission File Number 0-24768

                              MEDIX RESOURCES, INC.
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

                Colorado                                84-1123311
   (State or Other Jurisdiction of                     (IRS Employer
    Incorporation or Organization                    Identification No.)

                        420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1830
                            New York, New York 10170
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                    Issuer's Telephone Number: (212) 697-2509

         Securities Registered Under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
                         Common Stock - $.001 Par Value.

         Securities Registered Under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
                                      None


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and
(2) has been subject to such filing  requirements  for the past 90 days. Yes [X]
No [ ]


Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent  filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-X contained in this form, and no disclosure  will be contained,  to
the  best  of  registrant's   knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part  III of this  Form  10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]


The  aggregate   market  value  of  the   registrant's   Common  Stock  held  by
non-affiliates  of  the  registrant  as of  March  15,  2002  was  approximately
$31,707,233  (for  purposes  of the  foregoing  calculation  only,  each  of the
registrant's officers and directors is deemed to be an affiliate).


There were  58,386,516  shares of  registrant's  Common Stock  outstanding as of
March 15, 2001.


                      Documents incorporated by reference:
                                      None








                                TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
ITEM 2     PROPERTIES
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
ITEM 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT  MARKET RISK
ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

PART III

ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

PART IV

ITEM 14.   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K








                                     PART I


ITEM 1.   BUSINESS

Our Company

     Medix Resources,  Inc., a Colorado  corporation ("Medix" or the "Company"),
is an information  technology company with its principal executive office in New
York, New York. The Company also maintains offices in Agoura Hills,  California,
Greenwood  Village,  Colorado  and  Marietta,  Georgia.  We  specialize  in  the
development, marketing and management of software and connectivity solutions for
clinical and business  transactions within the healthcare industry.  Through our
wholly  owned  subsidiary,  Cymedix  Lynx  Corporation,  a Colorado  corporation
("Cymedix"),  we have developed the  Cymedix(R)suite  of software  products as a
toolkit to help modernize physician and healthcare  communication technology and
facilitate  transaction  productivity.  We  continue  to enhance  and refine our
products to enable the many disparate  information systems within the healthcare
industry to  communicate  with one another and to expand the scope of healthcare
transaction automation.

     The  Cymedix(R)suite  of products  facilitates the transmission of critical
clinical,   financial  and   administrative   information   between   healthcare
information systems, and provides healthcare institutions (such as health plans,
insurers,  hospitals  and  practicing  physicians)  with  non-invasive  software
products that can be integrated  with their existing  software  applications  to
provide  Internet-enabled  transaction  capability  between  all  parties.  This
approach is significant  because it offers substantial utility to physicians who
are cautious about making major  adjustments  to their  practice  disciplines or
reluctant to invest heavily in new, administrative technologies.

     The implementation of Cymedix(R)software products targets improved efficacy
of daily  interactions  between health  caregivers  and their staffs,  ancillary
providers such as laboratories and pharmacy  benefit managers (PBMs),  insurance
companies, hospitals, Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs) and Health Maintenance
Organizations  (HMOs).  Recent State and Federal legislative actions, as well as
industry  mandates to promote  quality  and the  privacy of patient  information
while controlling  costs,  have created fertile ground for effective  technology
solutions  that unite systems and enable digital  communication.  The market for
robust and practical  healthcare  solutions  will grow rapidly,  and that growth
will continue to accelerate as the joined emphases of consumer choice,  quality,
administrative  service  and  cost-containment  ratchet  up the  demand for more
efficient and user-friendly methods of delivering quality healthcare.

     Moreover,  Medix understands the essentially local nature of healthcare and
will deploy  Cymedix(R)software  products only in regions where we can guarantee
that each installed  physician can use our  technologies to serve most of his or
her   patients.   This   disciplined   market   approach,   combined   with  the
Cymedix(R)suite of  physician-centric  software products,  provides a foundation
for rapid adoption,  ongoing utilization and stable,  recurring revenue streams.
Our  regional  strategy  and  focus  on  authentic  physician  adoption  is what
differentiates us from most eHealth companies, including those who have survived
the rough justice of today's market, as well as the many who have perished.

     Medix was  incorporated  in the  State of  Colorado  in 1988.  For the next
decade, the Company operated as a temporary  healthcare  staffing company,  with
offices at various  times in Colorado,  New York,  Texas and  California.  Medix
disposed of the its remaining  healthcare  staffing operations in February 2000.
In  January  1998,  the  Company  acquired  Cymedix  Corporation,  a  California
corporation,  which was  merged  into our  wholly  owned  healthcare  technology
subsidiary, Cymedix Lynx Corporation.

     As of March 15,  2002,  we are in various  stages of  project  development,
testing and market  implementation  with six  clients  using  components  of the
Cymedix(R)software  suite to link healthcare participants by using the Internet.
While none of these projects have generated any significant revenues to date, if
funding can be obtained to continue and expand our  operations,  these  projects
should  position us as one of the  technology  leaders in the  emerging  eHealth
industry.  All of these  projects  involve  working with an existing  healthcare
insurer,   reference  laboratory  or  pharmacy  benefit  management  company  to
integrate selected  Cymedix(R)products  into their networks to enable physicians
to use those products for pharmacy  management  transactions,  laboratory orders
and results reporting or claims processing. See "Forward-Looking  Statements and
Associated  Risks"  under  "MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION below.

     Our principal  executive office is located at 420 Lexington  Avenue,  Suite
1830,  New York,  NY 10170,  and its  telephone  number is (212)  697-2509.  Our
principal  administrative  office  is at 7100  East  Belleview  Ave.,  Greenwood
Village, CO 80111, and its telephone number is (303) 741-2045.

Recent Developments

     We executed an Amended and  Restated  Common  Stock  Purchase  Warrant with
WellPoint  Pharmacy  Management a wholly owned  subsidiary  of WellPoint  Health
Networks Inc.,  dated February 18, 2002, to restructure our obligations to issue
warrants to  WellPoint.  Under that  Warrant,  we are  obligated  to issue up to
7,000,000  shares of our common stock at exercise  prices of $0.30 per share for
3,000,000,  $0.50  per  share  for  3,000,000  shares  and  $1.75  per share for
1,000,000  shares,  if various  performance  related  vesting  requirements  are
satisfied by WellPoint.  Currently,  WellPoint  has  satisfied  certain of these
requirements  giving  WellPoint  the right to purchase  1,850,000  shares of our
common  stock at $0.30  per  share.  The  Warrant  grants to  WellPoint  certain
registration  rights to require us to register with the SEC the shares issued to
WellPoint  for resale to the public.  In the  Warrant,  WellPoint  has agreed to
restrict  sales to the public of these  shares  during the first year after they
have been  issued to  200,000  shares per month and  100,000  shares in any five
trading days. The Warrant contains  anti-dilution  provisions providing that the
number of shares that may be  purchased  by  WellPoint  under the Warrant may be
adjusted in certain  circumstances.  WellPoint's  rights to purchase  our shares
under the Warrant expire on September 8, 2004.

     We entered into a secured convertible loan agreement with WellPoint,  dated
February  19,  2002,  pursuant to which we borrowed  $1,000,000  from  WellPoint
Health  Networks  Inc.  The loan becomes  payable on February  19, 2003,  if not
converted  into our common stock.  The loan earns annual  interest at a floating
rate of 300 basis points over prime, as it is adjusted from time to time,  which
is also payable at maturity and may be converted  into common stock.  Conversion
into common stock is at the option of either  WellPoint or Medix at a contingent
conversion  price. The conversion price will be either (i) at the price at which
additional shares are sold to other private placement investors if Medix obtains
written commitments for at least an additional $4,000,000 of equity by the close
of business on September 30, 2002, from persons not affiliates of WellPoint, and
if such sales are closed by the  maturity  date of the loan,  or (ii) at a price
equal to 80% of the  then-current  Fair Market Value (as defined below) if Medix
is unable to obtain a written commitment for the additional equity investment by
the close of business on  September  30, 2002 or close the sales by the maturity
date. For this purpose,  "Fair Market Value" shall be the average  closing price
of Medix common stock for the twenty trading days ending on the day prior to the
day of the conversion.  The loan is secured by the grant of a security  interest
in all Medix's  intellectual  property,  including  its patent,  copyrights  and
trademarks.  While Medix can cure a default in the  repayment of the loan at the
fixed maturity date by the forced  conversion of the loan into its common stock,
a cross default, breach of representation or warranty, and bankruptcy or similar
event  of  default  will  trigger  the  foreclosure  provision  of the  security
agreement.  The Company expects to require  conversion at the earliest  possible
time,  which may be before September 30, 2002 if the required funds are received
at which point the pledge of collateral will be received.

     In October 2001,  Medix announced the  introduction of  Cymedix(R)III,  the
next generation of its  proprietary,  point-of-care  products.  Cymedix(R)III is
based upon a robust and device-neutral  architecture that leverages  established
workstation,  handheld and wireless  technologies  and supports Medix' long-term
commitment  to  support  emerging  exam  room  and  point-of-care  technologies.
Cymedix(R)III  products,  including working applications for Cymedix(R)Pharmacy,
Laboratory  and  PlanConnect  services,  will be made available to physicians in
2002. Until recently,  the combination of expensive,  front-end  equipment costs
coupled  with   time-consuming   and  often  problematic  data   synchronization
requirements  effectively  dampened  the  physician's  appetite  for  any of the
point-of-care  technologies being offered. Our new Cymedix(R)III architecture is
both  fully  scalable  and  device-neutral,   allowing  our  Pharmacy,  Lab  and
PlanConnect  products to be delivered  via  workstation  and  wireless  handheld
devices with the  technologies  available  today as well as those of the future.
The addition of wireless  capability  within our  Cymedix(R)III  product release
naturally  complements  the Medix  suite of  transaction  products,  and enables
physicians  and their  office  staff to execute the full range of  clinical  and
support  transactions from their office workstation,  their home desktop or from
the exam room itself,  via a handheld device with real-time  synchronization  of
secure patient data. We believe that the expanded  capabilities of Cymedix(R)III
offer a  compelling  value  return  for  physicians  and will  accelerate  their
adoption of our technology.

     Finally, during 2001, we ceased operations of our Automated Design Concepts
division (ADC), a Web design business.  We had acquired ADC in early 2000 from a
former  officer  and  director  of the  Company  for cash and  stock  valued  at
$474,000.  In connection with our general cost reduction program,  we determined
that the business of the subsidiary was not part of our core business operations
and  therefore did not justify our continued  financial  support.  In connection
with the  termination  of our  subsidiary's  operations  we took a write-off  of
goodwill  in the amount of  $443,000.  We also  determined  that our  license of
proprietary  software from  ZirMed.com had no value to us and had no more than a
nominal market value. In 2001, we wrote-off the unamortized value of the related
intangible asset, which was $668,000.

Our Industry

     The U.S.  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid  Services  (formerly the Health
Care Finance Administration) estimates that $1.4 trillion dollars, or 14% of the
U.S.  Gross  domestic  product,  is spent  annually  on  healthcare.  Healthcare
expenditures are expected to grow to approximately $2.8 trillion by 2011, due to
increasingly   expensive  and  sophisticated   clinical  technology,   an  aging
population base and the growing demands of newly-empowered  and health conscious
consumers.

     Every year, the healthcare industry conducts its business by executing more
than 30 billion transactions, more than 90% of which are untouched by integrated
automation.   Core   transactions   --  such  as  enrollment   and   eligibility
verification,   referrals  and  authorizations,   lab  orders  and  lab  results
reporting,  billing and claims and  prescription-writing  with drug  interaction
checks  -- are  processed  through a  disjointed  matrix  of  isolated  systems,
including  paper,  fax and  phone.  Of  necessity,  every  provider,  insurer or
supplier has invested in its own  proprietary and often  antiquated  information
system. As a result,  duplication is rampant,  error  probabilities are enormous
and the waste of precious resources is glaringly obvious.

     Health  economists  estimate  that  20%  or  more  of  the  nation's  total
healthcare expenditures is spent on backroom  administration.  Another 10% funds
the  fallout  of  adverse  health  events  that  are  caused  by  inaccurate  or
unavailable patient information.  The cumulative effect is that, more than 4% of
our  nation's  annual  economic  output  is  being  consumed  by a  service  and
transactions industry that pleases no one and angers many.

     Today's  inefficient and "silo" healthcare  information systems are created
by the extreme fragmentation and complexity of the industry. Briefly:

o    Healthcare remains a quintessentially cottage industry. There are currently
     approximately  645,000  practicing  physicians,   6,200  hospitals,  16,500
     nursing  homes,   8,000  home  health  care  agencies,   4,500  independent
     laboratories  and  thousands  of  managed  care   organizations  and  other
     ancillary (usually local) health care providers.

o    The various  constituents  of healthcare have sharply  different  levels of
     access  to  capital.  Typically,  insurers  have had the  finances  to fund
     large-scale  systems  able to  structure  and  share  uniform  information.
     Physicians  do  not.  This  imbalance  has  produced  an  industry  rich in
     proprietary    administrative   systems   but   poor   in   patient-focused
     point-of-care information systems.

o    Government  regulation  of the  industry  is  splintered  across 50 states,
     coupled with substantial federal intervention.

o    Healthcare  is an  extremely  complex  business.  Literally,  errors can be
     life-threatening.   Until  recently,  affordable  technologies  capable  of
     replacing wasteful,  but comparatively safe  administrative  practices were
     not available.


     The Internet provides a platform for catalytic change within the healthcare
industry. Grabbing hold of that opportunity requires the deployment of effective
connectivity  tools that enable disparate  systems to effectively and affordably
communicate with one another. The Internet's emerging,, ubiquitous accessibility
and   growing   acceptance   make  it  an   increasingly   critical   tool   for
business-to-business and business-to-consumer  interaction.  Moreover,  Internet
use is undergoing a transformation from simple,  static information  publishing,
messaging,  and data gathering to real-time,  interactive  applications that are
capable of  supporting  core  business  transactions  and  fundamental  business
processes.

     In many  industries,  work is in  progress  to  harness  the  power  of the
Internet  and to fuse  previously  disconnected  business  processes  that allow
companies to reengineer workflows,  reduce administrative and distribution costs
and leverage core-competency,  expert resources. Because of its size, complexity
and  dependence  on accurate and timely  information  exchange,  the  healthcare
industry is well suited to benefit from the  connectivity  and data  integration
solutions  that we are  developing.  In  addition,  as more  and  more  powerful
technology  tools  become  available  at  decreasing  cost  levels,   (including
workstations,   handheld  devices  and  wireless  networks),   we  believe  that
physicians will acquire more advanced  technology  platforms to optimize patient
care, automate processes and better leverage their clinical experience.

     Administrative  processes in healthcare consume  approximately $300 billion
per year.  Insurers  typically spend 10-12% of gross premiums in administration,
not including  sales  acquisition  costs. A typical  physician  practice  spends
between 25%-50% of gross billings on administration. Medix's mission is to offer
a set of tools to  physicians  and to  insurers  that  takes  direct  aim at the
present tab of administrative  cost and reduces the potential of clinical error.
For the eHealth industry, we believe it to be a $20 billion opportunity.

Our Products and Technology

     Cymedix(R)is  a suite of  software  products  and  integration  tools  that
seamlessly moves clinical and administrative  information among health insurers,
physicians,   pharmacy   benefit   management   companies  and  reference  labs.
Collectively,  they create an indispensable,  non-invasive  technology  platform
that  establishes  secure  connectivity  among the many isolated  systems of the
healthcare industry. The Cymedix(R)platform enables physicians or their staff to
use software that  transparently  performs the timesaving  activity of gathering
and  transmitting  vital  patient  information  to  healthcare  entities.  Since
physicians   can   offload   substantial    administrative    burdens   to   the
Cymedix(R)software  products, we believe they will see the opportunity to employ
the Cymedix(R)product suite (PBM, payor, pharmacy, lab and hospital connections)
to improve the quality of patient care and to grow their business.

     We deliver our  solutions  via the Internet  using secure socket layers and
other encryption  technologies  that protect  confidential  patient  information
while reducing the physician's  need to purchase and manage on-site hardware and
software systems.  The Cymedix(R)suite of products may be utilized on any device
that supports an Internet browser,  allowing our software to run on a wide range
of  equipment,   from  aging  personal  computers  to  leading  edge  exam  room
technologies (handheld devices,  tablets,  etc.). In addition, the advent of low
cost,  secure  wireless  networking  solutions  makes the last inch of the "last
mile" of physician practice  implementation vastly easier today than even a year
ago.

     Our Cymedix(R)Universal Interface (CUI) is central to the implementation of
the  Cymedix(R)suite  of products.  Physicians  generally  reject new technology
solutions  that  require new  investments  in time or money over and above their
primary investment in practice management systems.  Therefore,  we believe it is
imperative  to  deliver  solutions  that  effectively  leverage  their  practice
management  investment  at no  additional  cost.  The CUI toolkit  automatically
extracts  pre-selected  data  elements  from  existing  systems  and  remaps the
targeted  information for use by the  Cymedix(R)software  suite. This technology
permits the  Cymedix(R)suite  to  efficiently  and  effectively  integrate  with
virtually any practice  management system,  thereby eliminating the need to hard
code unique,  expensive and time-consuming  interfaces.  Typically, the practice
management system is the only administrative information system in a physician's
practice and is therefore the most trusted  source for patient and billing data.
The CUI  enables  the  physician's  staff to embrace  the  Cymedix(R)suite  as a
value-added  adjunct of their legacy  practice  management  system,  all without
having to bear  duplicative  processes such as the re-keying of critical patient
data.

The Cymedix(R)software suite of products includes:

     ----------------------------  --------------------------------------

                                   o  Pharmacy benefit manager
     Cymedix(R)Pharmacy   >>>>        identification (eligibility
                                      verification and an automatic
                                      link to formulary/benefits
                                      information.)
                                   o  Electronic prescribing (retail
                                      and mail order).
                                   o  Medication history.
                                   o  Treatment and formulary
                                      compliance.
                                   o  Drug to drug interaction, drug to
                                      allergy, duplicate therapy and
                                      other clinical checks.
                                   o  Messaging and prompts.
                                   o  Compliance analysis
                                   o  Complete lab order entry.
     Cymedix(R)Lab   >>>>          o  Medical necessity verification.
                                   o  24/7  results  reporting  (partial
                                      and full).
                                   o  Specimen tracking.
                                   o  Messaging and prompts.
                                   o  Cumulative and custom reporting.
                                   o  Eligibility verification.
     Cymedix(R)PlanConnect >>>>    o  Referrals and authorizations.
                                   o  Custom messaging and prompts.
                                   o  Electronic claim validation,
                                      submission and tracking.



     The introduction of our proprietary,  point-of-care  products is proceeding
with our six active  customers.  Our suite of software  products is based upon a
robust  and  device-neutral  architecture  that  leverages  proven  workstation,
handheld  and  wireless  technologies.  Our  Cymedix(R)technology   architecture
includes a flexible  integration  framework that facilitates  rapid and reliable
connectivity  efforts.  All product components,  including  Cymedix(R) Pharmacy,
Cymedix(R) Laboratory and Cymedix(R)PlanConnect services are in final testing as
we prepare for production-level physician installations in second quarter 2002.

     On the sponsor host side, we are in late-stage  development and testing for
customized  integrations  with  each  of our  active  contracts.  When we sign a
connectivity  agreement with a transaction  sponsor (PBM, payor, lab,  hospital,
etc.),  we move into a disciplined  integration  phase in which we establish the
interface connection to the sponsor,  enable transactions,  tailor the front-end
to the sponsor's requirements, and incorporate any sponsor-specific rules within
our applications.  Generally,  this integration phase should take between 90-120
days,  depending upon the pace, regimen and internal resource  allocation set by
our  customers.  However,  as we have learned with  earlier  pilots,  these time
frames are  variable  and may be extended  indefinitely  for reasons  beyond our
control. After the integration phase is completed, we move to the deployment and
production phase when transaction fee revenues will be generated.

     We have targeted our initial,  production-level  physician installations to
begin in second quarter 2002 and we currently expect transaction fee revenues to
commence  before the end of the second  quarter  2002.  While we had expected to
begin receiving such revenues in the first quarter of 2002, the scope and timing
of several sponsor host integrations  required that we push the physician launch
date to the next quarter.  As a result,  we have yet to receive any  transaction
fee revenue.

     The marketing and development of our  Cymedix(R)suite  of software products
is our  sole  business  at  this  time,  and a  substantial  portion  of our net
operating  loss is due to such efforts.  We are funding such expenses as well as
our administrative expenses through the sale of our securities.

Our Sponsor Customer Relationships

     As an eHealth connectivity company, Medix must build relationships with two
sets of customers: physician end-users and sponsor host institutions,  including
health plans,  pharmacy  benefit  managers,  reference  laboratories  and other,
ancillary types of managed care networks. These sponsor organizations, typically
large  enterprises,  pay our  per-click  transaction  fees as  described  in the
section titled "Our Strategy and Business Model" below. Our  relationships  with
WellPoint  Pharmacy  Management,  Merck-Medco  and  Express  Scripts,  Inc.  all
recorded key sponsor customer events in 2001

WellPoint Pharmacy Management

     In 2001,  Medix  announced  that we had  completed  our pilot  program with
WellPoint  Pharmacy  Management  (WPM)  and  a  joint  deployment  of  Web-based
transactions  services  to WPM health  plan  customers  and their  participating
physicians  will begin during 2002. WPM has long committed to providing value to
customers,   patients  and  physician   partners   through  the  elimination  of
administrative  waste, clinical error, fraud and abuse. They enjoy a well-earned
reputation  for  extraordinary  growth  and  clinical  programs  of  excellence.
Together,  Medix and WPM have  forged  deep,  long-term  ties  bound by a common
objective to provide physicians with the tools and means to elevate the clinical
experience  through shared  information and decision  support.  Our robust pilot
program with WPM,  combined with the gathering  momentum in the emerging eHealth
industry,  has allowed Medix to strengthen  our sales pipeline over a compressed
timeframe.  In  addition,  our  multi  dimensional   relationship  involves  the
following:

     Product Distribution - Through the execution of an amendment to the Warrant
Agreement,  WellPoint Pharmacy Management has formally agreed to recommend Medix
Resources,  Inc. to their  customers  and key vendors.  WPM enjoys a diversified
customer  base  that  includes  health  plans,   employers  and  regional  PBMs.
Initially, Medix and WPM are focusing joint sales activities on WPM's large Blue
Cross Blue Shield plan customers. Executing customer agreements with WPM's large
customers  will provide Medix with  significant  patient  density in several key
markets. Under a formal agreement with specific targets and incentives, WPM will
earn warrants in Medix shares when  WPM-sponsored  customers  agree to implement
the Cymedix(R) technology set.

     Product  Development - Medix and WPM are executing a shared,  formal agenda
to  continually  research,  test and implement new product  enhancements.  These
collaborative  product development efforts offer a substantive benefit to Medix,
as WPM  possesses a powerful  repository  of  pharmacy  industry  knowledge  and
distinguished clinical expertise.

     Our longstanding and close working  relationship  with WPM is a significant
asset,  especially as they are a first-rate  reference  with which we can expand
our reach to healthcare's other large constituencies.

Merck-Medco and Express Scripts, Inc.

     In October 2001, we announced  agreements with two of the nation's  leading
pharmacy benefit managers,  Merck-Medco and Express Scripts, Inc. These business
relationships  allow us to  provide  physicians  with  point-of-care  access  to
clinical information and electronic prescribing. Client integration work is well
underway  and we will  shortly  begin  joint  deployment  of these  services  to
Merck-Medco and Express Scripts health plan customers and physicians.  Different
than the  start-up  of our WPM  relationship,  neither  Merck-Medco  nor Express
Scripts requires a phased product pilot program.

     Our  agreements   with   Merck-Medco  and  Express  Scripts  are  important
milestones  for Medix.  Merck-Medco  is the  nation's  second  largest  pharmacy
benefits  manager,  with a  client  roster  that  includes  major  insurers  and
corporations  throughout  the  nation  and more  importantly  within  our target
markets.  Likewise,  Express  Scripts,  Inc. is an ideal match  because of their
demonstrated market leadership. Both Merck-Medco and Express Scripts are leading
sponsors of technology initiatives that place decision-making tools in the hands
of  physicians  at the point of care.  Together,  our joint efforts will provide
physicians and their staffs with easy-to-use connectivity solutions that support
all aspects of the prescription process.

Our Strategy and Business Model

     General.  Our market  strategy is  organized  around  several  well-defined
components.  First,  we believe  that there is  significant  value  attached  to
offering products that complement today's commonly available technologies.  This
is a critical  aspect of the added value that we bring to our sponsor  customers
and  physicians.  For  Medix,  it means  delivering  connectivity  and  software
solutions  that  take into  consideration  our  users'  current  technology  and
workflows.  For example,  many  physician  practices  have not yet invested in a
high-speed  (DSL/cable)  Internet  connection.  Therefore  we have  designed our
products to excel at every level of  connectivity,  from the less  sophisticated
dial-up capability to high speed, persistent connections.

     Second, our business model is a per-click transaction fee model paid for by
large institutional sponsors with an interest in enabling their connectivity and
information  sharing with physician  offices.  Physicians'  offices operate on a
private network created by Medix and financed by per click transaction fees from
sponsoring  institutions.  We expect  that this  approach  will offer  favorable
returns  to  sponsoring   institutions  through  aggregate   administrative  and
underwriting cost savings while enabling physicians' offices to reduce paperwork
and costs within their practice environment with no front-end investment. In the
longer term, as the value proposition  becomes more obvious to physicians,  they
may elect to pay for an expanded suite of services.

     Third, we believe that the functionality  provided by the Cymedix(R)product
suite,  together with the CUI,  gives us a distinct  competitive  advantage.  By
enabling  physician  practices  to  continue to use their  existing  information
systems while accessing our non-invasive technology,  we recognize and honor the
physician's  investment in their choice of practice management  technology.  Our
approach recognizes that, as in medicine, our first duty is to do no harm. Thus,
while the  Cymedix(R)product  suite offers  attractive  timesaving  clinical and
administrative capabilities,  our products do not put at risk any of the assumed
"safe" features of today's processes.

     Fourth,  we act as support  partners to our customers and users. Our intent
is to leave the business of medicine to  physicians  and the business of managed
care to managed care companies.  We bring value by constructing safe and secure,
high-speed  data  highways  that enable  connectivity  and  provide  hassle-free
productivity tools for all users.

     Finally,  we believe that our  approach and the products  that we make take
direct aim at the wasteful  administration costs that plague all of healthcare's
stakeholders.  Our  internal  standards  mandate  that  we  make  a  substantive
difference  in this  area,  and we ask our  users  and  customers  to  judge  us
accordingly.

     Taken  together,   these  strategy   components   position  Medix  to  earn
substantial,  recurring revenue streams at attractive  margins.  Moreover,  once
critical  density is reached,  continued  growth in our core product line can be
supported  without  substantial  reinvestment  in added  support or  fulfillment
infrastructure, further leveraging our market investment returns for the future.

     Our plan to secure long-term  recurring revenue streams via the creation of
contractual  relationships  with large sponsors is well underway.  As physicians
grow  to  appreciate  the  benefit  of  our  institutionally  sponsored  product
offerings  and to  recognize  the  value of  clinical  and  administrative  data
captured  during ongoing use of our product suite, we believe we can establish a
market for  physician-centric  enhancements  and add-ons to our products.  Medix
plans to offer physicians  additional  timesaving  features that further improve
patient  care  and  practice   profitability.   Among  these  features  will  be
connectivity  gateways to non-sponsored  transactions,  charge capture,  patient
relationship  management  services  and  document  management.  We  expect  that
physicians will pay for these  additional  services under a subscription  model.
Broadly cast, our business model follows the following regimen:

|X|  Medix   establishes  a  connection   between  sponsor   organizations   and
     physicians.

|X|  Using the CUI and our product suite, physicians and practice administrators
     drive  transactions  via their  practice  management  systems,  handheld or
     wireless devices, or through a direct Internet connection to Medix servers.

|X|  Sponsor organizations pay for transactions.

|X|  Physicians  will pay for  subscription  services  to gain  access to future
     product  enhancements that leverage their  administrative  efficiencies and
     clinical effectiveness.

     Our Regional  Strategy.  Healthcare  services are  insured,  delivered  and
remunerated  differently  from one  region to  another.  Medix  understands  the
essential,  local  nature  of  healthcare  and  will  deploy  Cymedix(R)software
products only in regions where we can assure that each  installed  physician can
use our  technologies  to serve most of his or her  patients.  This  disciplined
market  approach,   combined  with  the  Cymedix(R)suite  of  physician-oriented
software  products,  provides a foundation  for rapid  adoption,  and  sustained
physician  utilization.   Moreover,  we  believe  that  contracting  with  large
communities  of  physicians  and sponsor  organizations  within  highly  defined
geographies  creates a highly  desirable  financial and  operating  scenario for
Medix as well as lasting brand presence that sharply  differentiates us from our
competition.

     Given  adequate  long term  financing,  we intend  to  initially  focus our
resources on deploying the  Cymedix(R)software  suite in five markets.  They are
Atlanta,  Northern California,  Southern  California,  the New York Metropolitan
Area, and Chicago.  As of March 2002, our Atlanta market development efforts are
underway with a planned Q2, 2002 product launch.

     See  "Forward-Looking  Statements and Associated Risks" under "MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" below.

Our Marketing and Sales Approach

     The Company intends to pursue a focused but multi-dimensional marketing and
sales strategy over the next several years. Specifically:

o    We will concentrate our energies on selected,  geographical  target markets
     that provide ample  transaction  potential and offer us the  opportunity to
     penetrate a significant share of physician desktops.

o    We will seek to partner  first with a leading,  anchor client or consortium
     of anchor clients in each of the selected markets.

o    Following  platform   development  with  the  anchor  client(s),   we  will
     concentrate  our sales  focus on  enlisting  the second  tier of  potential
     customers,  including corollary agreements with regional-specific suppliers
     such as  pharmacy  benefit  managers,  labs and large,  organized  provider
     groups. Our goal is to achieve major market density.

o    Concurrent with the market breadth effort described above, the Company will
     aggressively  seek added market depth by up-selling and  cross-selling  the
     full  portfolio  of  product  services  to  existing  customers  and  their
     affiliates.

o    As our brand and  presence  gains  local  strength,  we will seek to market
     relevant  enhancements and add-ons to our products  directly to physicians,
     using a monthly subscription model.

Sales Process

     Most of our customers are large health plans,  PBM's and lab companies that
are national in scope, but are operated on a local or regional basis. Therefore,
it is imperative to organize sales efforts at both the national and local levels
to close sales, gain market share and retain existing customers. Consistent with
our  regional  approach  to market  sales and  implementations,  the Medix sales
process draws resources and experience from both corporate and regional teams.

       ----------------------------------     ---------------------------------

       National Sales Process Team            Regional Sales Process Teams

       |X|   CEO                              |X|   Regional Market CEO
       |X|   EVP & CTO                        |X|   Local Implementation Team
       |X|   EVP Operations                   |X|   Local Consultants (as
       |X|   Selected Technology Team                needed)
              Members                         |X|   Selected Technology Team
                                                     Members

       ----------------------------------     ---------------------------------

     Medix views the sales process to gain customer  relationships as a two-step
process.  This  process can happen  sequentially  or be pursued  along  parallel
tracks.  The national  sales process team is  responsible  for  negotiating  and
executing  contracts  as well as  charged  with  the  responsibility  to  expand
customer  relationships  in terms  of  product  base or  market  expansion.  The
regional sales process team is  responsible  for local account sales and account
management and the local administration of the sale's execution for our national
customers.

     At present, our executive staff devotes a substantive portion of their time
to sales,  marketing  and  account  management  activities.  Longer  term,  with
appropriate  financing  in place,  we expect to  recruit  and hire a new head of
Corporate Business Development,  as well as to staff our regional  organizations
with resident sales professionals to complement current resources.

     Outside   consultants   have  been  engaged  to  assist  with  sales  leads
development and  target-customer  introductions.  Outside  contractors also have
been  retained  to  develop  marketing  and  sales  literature  for the  Cymedix
software.  Materials  to promote  the  various  Cymedix  applications  are being
developed for direct mailing to physicians affiliated with our customers.

Competition

     eHealth  Services.  The market for  eHealth  services is  evolving,  highly
fragmented  and  subject  to  fast-moving  technological  change.  Although  our
competitive position is difficult to characterize,  due principally to the youth
of our market  niche and the  diversity  of current and future  competitors,  we
believe the primary competitive  elements in the eHealth  connectivity  business
are: (i) the scope,  quality and performance of the technologies  offered;  (ii)
rates of physician adoption and sustained  utilization;  and (iii) the integrity
and market-worthiness of pricing and data models.

     We  believe  our  principal  competitive  advantages  are:  (i) our  robust
technology architecture;  (ii) our CUI toolkit; (iii) our clinical product base;
(iiii) our  regional  and  physician-centric  focus;  and (iiiii)  our  customer
relationships.  There are other  connectivity  companies,  in the United States,
both publicly held and private,  that compete  directly or indirectly with Medix
Resources, Inc. Moreover, competition can be expected to emerge from established
healthcare  information vendors and established or new Internet related vendors.
The most likely  competitors are companies with a focus on clinical  information
systems and enterprises with an Internet  commerce or electronic  network focus.
Currently,  we view our main  competitors  as  WebMD,  ProxyMed,  NaviMedix  and
AllScripts. These competitors may have greater financial marketing or technology
resources  than us. We will  seek to raise  capital  to  develop  and  implement
Cymedix products in a timely manner,  however,  so long as our operations remain
under funded, as they are now, we will be at a competitive disadvantage.

     Software  Development  Personnel.  The  success of the  development  of our
Cymedix software is dependent to a significant  degree on our key management and
technical  personnel.  We believe  that our  success  will also  depend upon our
ability to attract,  motivate and retain highly skilled,  managerial,  sales and
marketing,  and technical personnel,  including software programmers and systems
architects  skilled in the  computer  languages  in which our  Cymedix  products
operate. Competition for such personnel in the software and information services
industries is intense.  The loss of key  personnel,  or the inability to hire or
retain qualified personnel,  could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, financial condition or business.

Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights

     US Patent No 5,995,939 was issued on November 30, 1999 to our  wholly-owned
subsidiary,  Cymedix Lynx  Corporation from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
("USPTO").  The patent  covers our  automated  service  request and  fulfillment
system and will expire October 14, 2017. A divisional U.S.  patent  application,
including  five  claims  directed  to the  method by which the  system  operates
through the Cymedix Universal Interface, has been abandoned

     The USPTO issued to Cymedix U.S.  Trademark  Registration No. 2,269,377 for
the mark  CYMEDIX  in  connection  with  "computer  software  for data  base and
electronic  record  management in the healthcare field" on August 10, 1999, U.S.
Trademark  Registration  No.  2,316,240  for the mark  LYNX in  connection  with
"computer  software to provide secure  communication  on a global  communication
information  network" on February 8, 2000, and U.S.  Trademark  Registration No.
2,409,248 for the mark  CYMEDIX.COM in connection  with  "computer  software for
database and electronic  record  management in the healthcare field" on November
28, 2000.

     Cymedix has obtained seven copyright registrations for two versions of each
of three modular software  components of the Cymedix suite of products,  as well
as a technical evaluation document that describes the software products.

     No assurance  can be given that any of our software  products  will receive
additional  patent  or  other  intellectual  property  protection.  Cymedix  has
assigned the above patent and copyrights registrations to Medix.

     We seek to protect our software,  documentation and other written materials
primarily  through a combination of trade secret,  trademark and copyright laws,
confidentiality  procedures and contractual provisions.  In addition, we seek to
avoid disclosure of our trade secrets,  by, among other things,  requiring those
persons with access to our  proprietary  information to execute  confidentiality
agreements with us and restricting access to our source code.

     Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties
may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use  information  that
we  regard  as  proprietary.  Policing  unauthorized  use  of  our  products  is
difficult.  While we are unable to  determine  the extent to which piracy of our
products  exists,  software  piracy can be expected to be a persistent  problem,
particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary
rights as fully as in the United States.

     From time to time, we are involved in intellectual  property  disputes.  We
may notify others that we believe their products  infringe upon our intellectual
property  rights,  and we may be notified by others that they  believe  that our
products  infringe  on  their  intellectual  property  rights.  We  expect  that
providers of eHealth  solutions  will  increasingly  be subject to  infringement
claims as the number of  products  and  competitors  in our  industry  grows and
traditional  suppliers of health care data and  transaction  solutions  begin to
offer  Internet-based  products.  If our proprietary  technology is subjected to
infringement  claims,  we may  have to  expend  substantial  amounts  to  defend
ourselves,  and, if we lose,  pay damages or seek a license from third  parties,
which  could delay  sales of our  products.  If our  proprietary  technology  is
infringed  upon,  we may have to expend  substantial  amounts to  prosecute  the
infringing parties,  and we may experience losses if we cannot support our claim
of infringement.

     We have been notified by a party that it believes our pharmacy  product may
infringe on patents that it holds.  We have retained patent counsel who has made
a preliminary investigation and determined that our product does not infringe on
the identified patents. At this time no legal action has been instituted.

Government Regulation

     Federal  and  state  laws and  regulations  regulate  many  aspects  of our
business.  Since  sanctions  may  be  imposed  for  violations  of  these  laws,
compliance  is a  significant  operational  requirement.  We  believe  we are in
substantial  compliance  with all existing  legal  requirements  material to the
operation  of our  businesses.  There are,  however,  significant  uncertainties
involving the  application of many of these legal  requirements to our business.
We are  unable to  predict  what  additional  federal  or state  legislation  or
regulatory  initiatives may be enacted in the future relating to our business or
the health  care  industry in general,  or what effect any such  legislation  or
regulations  might have on us. We cannot  provide any assurance  that federal or
state   governments   will  not   impose   additional   restrictions   or  adopt
interpretations  of existing laws that could have a material  adverse  affect on
our results or operations, financial position and/or cash flow from operations.

     HIPAA and Standardized  Transactions.  Our sponsor  customers and physician
users must comply with the Administration Simplification provision of the Health
Insurance  Portability and  Accountability  Act of 1996 (HIPAA),  which includes
regulations  for  privacy,  transactions,   code  sets,  security  and  standard
identifiers.   Final   regulations  and   implementation   deadlines  exist  for
transactions,  code sets and privacy while only proposed  regulations  exist for
security  and  standard  identifiers.  Accordingly,  our  products  must contain
features and  functionality  that allow our  customers  and users to comply with
existing law.

     As the effective date of the HIPAA regulations  approach,  they will have a
major  impact  on us as  well  as  every  other  participant  in the  healthcare
industry. Significant resources will be required to implement these regulations.
Major  retooling of medical  information  technology will be required to install
the required  standardized  codes and procedures.  Transaction  standards,  code
sets,  and  identifiers  will  need to be  installed  on  medical  participants'
networks and office computers. Security and privacy regulations will be the most
difficult  to  implement  and  maintain  because  they are broad in scope,  less
definitive,  and require ongoing vigilance to assure compliance.  Estimate costs
of implementation vary widely but will be in the billion of dollars.  Failure to
comply could put us or any other healthcare participant out of business.

     We believe that our  Cymedix(R)software  product  offerings are designed to
allow for full compliance with known HIPAA regulations.  However, until all such
regulations are issued and final,  they could be modified,  which may require us
to  expend  additional  resources  to  comply  with the  revised  standards.  In
addition,  given  their  novelty,  breadth  in  scope,  and  uncertainty  as  to
interpretation,   implementation  will  be  uncertain  and  the  possibility  of
inadvertently failing to meet these standards is high. Such failure could result
in fines and penalties being assessed against us or cause our business to suffer
in other ways.

     Government Regulation of the Internet.  Laws and regulations may be adopted
with respect to the Internet or other on-line  services  covering issues such as
user privacy, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution and characteristics and
quality of  products  and  services.  The  adoption  of any  additional  laws or
regulations  may impede the growth of the  Internet or other  on-line  services,
which could,  in turn,  decrease the demand for our  software  applications  and
services,  increase our cost of doing  business,  or  otherwise  have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover,
the  applicability  to the  Internet of existing  laws in various  jurisdictions
governing issues such as property  ownership,  sales and other taxes,  libel and
personal  privacy  is  uncertain  and may take  years to  resolve.  Any such new
legislation  or  regulation,  the  application  of  laws  and  regulations  from
jurisdictions  whose  laws  do  not  currently  apply  to our  business,  or the
application  of existing laws and  regulations  to the Internet and other online
services  could  have a  material  adverse  effect  on our  business,  financial
condition and results of operations.

     Confidentiality and Security. While HIPAA regulations,  as discussed above,
are  expected to  generally  govern in this area,  regulation  by various  state
agencies  may also still  apply to  confidentiality  of patient  records and the
circumstances  under which such  records may be released  for  inclusion  in our
databases.   Such  regulations  govern  both  the  disclosure  and  the  use  of
confidential  patient medical records.  Such regulation could require holders of
such information,  including us, to implement costly security  measures,  or may
materially  restrict the ability of health care providers to submit  information
from patient records using our  applications.  We utilize an  architecture  that
incorporates encrypted messaging, firewalls and other security methods to assure
customers of a compliant and secure computing environment.  However, no security
procedure  is failsafe,  and we will always be subject to a potential  breach of
security by wither  determined  human effort or inadvertent  human error.  If we
were  found  liable  for any such  breach,  such  finding  could have a material
adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

     False  Claims Act.  Under the federal  False Claims Act,  liability  may be
imposed on any  individual or entity who knowingly  submits or  participates  in
submitting  claims for  payment  to the  federal  government  which are false or
fraudulent, or which contain false or misleading information. Liability may also
be imposed on any  individual or entity who knowingly make or use a false record
or statement to avoid an obligation to pay the federal government. Certain state
laws impose similar liability.  The federal government or private whistleblowers
may bring claims under the federal  False Claims Act. If we are found liable for
a violation of the federal  False  Claims Act, or any similar  state law, due to
our processing of claims for Medicaid and Medicare, it may result in substantial
civil  and  criminal  penalties.  In  addition,  we  could  be  prohibited  from
processing Medicaid or Medicare claims for payment.

     Government Investigations. There is significant scrutiny by law enforcement
authorities,  the U.S.  Department  of  Health  and  Human  Services  Office  of
Inspector  General,  the courts and Congress of  agreements  between  healthcare
providers and suppliers or other  contractors  that have a potential to increase
utilization of government  health care  resources.  In particular,  scrutiny has
been  placed on the  coding of  claims  for  payment,  incentive  programs  that
increase use of a product and  contracted  billing  arrangements.  Investigators
have  demonstrated  a  willingness  to look beyond the  formalities  of business
arrangements  to determine the  underlying  purposes of payments  between health
care  participants.  Although,  to our  knowledge,  neither  we  nor  any of our
customers is the subject of any investigation,  we cannot tell whether we or our
customers will be the target of governmental investigations in the future.

     Federal and State  Anti-Kickback  Laws.  Provisions of the Social  Security
Act,  which  are  commonly  known as the  Federal  Anti-Kickback  Law,  prohibit
knowingly or willfully,  directly or  indirectly,  paying or offering to pay, or
soliciting  or  receiving,  any  remuneration  in exchange  for the  referral of
patients  to  a  person  participating  in,  or  for  the  order,   purchase  or
recommendation  of items or  services  that are  subject  to  reimbursement  by,
Medicare,  Medicaid  and similar  other  federal or state  healthcare  programs.
Violations may result in civil and criminal  sanctions and penalties.  If any of
our health care  communications or electronic commerce activities were deemed to
be inconsistent with the Federal  Anti-Kickback Law or with state  anti-kickback
or illegal  remuneration  laws, we could face civil and criminal penalties or be
barred from such  activities.  Further,  we could be required to restructure our
existing  or  planned  sponsorship  compensation   arrangements  and  electronic
commerce activities in a manner that could harm our business.

     If compliance with government  regulation of healthcare  becomes costly and
difficult for us and our  customers,  we may not be able to grow our business as
we plan, or we may have to abandon a product or service we are providing or plan
to provide altogether.

Employees

     As of March 15,  2002,  we had 28  full-time  and no  part-time  employees.
Fifteen of these  employees are involved in software  programming and support of
the Cymedix network,  7 are involved in the marketing and deployment of product,
and 6 are involved in our administrative and financial  operations.  None of our
employees is represented by a labor union, and we have never  experienced a work
stoppage.  We believe our relationship  with our employees to be good.  However,
our ability to achieve our financial and operational objectives depends in large
part upon our  continuing  ability to attract,  integrate,  retain and  motivate
highly  qualified  sales,  technical  and  managerial  personnel,  and  upon the
continued  service  of  our  senior  management  and  key  sales  and  technical
personnel.  See  "Executive  Officers  Compensation  -  Employment  Agreements."
Competition  for such qualified  personnel in our industry and the  geographical
locations of our offices is intense,  particularly  in software  development and
technical personnel.


ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

     Our principal  executive office is located at 420 Lexington  Avenue,  Suite
1830, New York, NY 10170.  In addition,  we have three other offices  located in
Colorado, California and Georgia.

                                 Square           Expiration             2002
                                Footage              Date             Rent (est.)
                               -----------        ------------        -----------
   New York, New York            10,495             1-31-05            $212,526
   Greenwood Village              5,236             7-31-03            $ 98,000
    Colorado(1)
   Agoura Hills, California       3.474             3-31-07            $ 69,305
   Marietta, Georgia              2,060             2-28-04            $ 31,930
                               ===========                            ===========
                       Totals:   21,265                                $411,761


(1)  In connection with the sale of our remaining  staffing business in 2000, we
     subleased  2,735 square feet of this space to the  purchaser,  who will pay
     $50,000 in rent  annually  for such space  until July 31,  2002.  We remain
     jointly liable for rental payments on such subleased space until the end of
     the  sublease  and  liable  for all the  space  until  the end of the lease
     indicated above.

     In addition to the properties  listed in the above table,  the Company also
is liable for rental  payments  on an old lease in East  Brunswick,  New Jersey,
encompassing  7888  square feet of vacant  office  space.  The  monthly  rent is
approximately  $12,500,  with a  lease  termination  date  of  April  30,  2003.
Management is currently  engaged in negotiations  with the landlord to terminate
this agreement.

     We  believe  these  facilities  will  be  suitable  for our  needs  for the
foreseeable future. We have insured all of our properties at the levels required
to meet our lease  obligations.  We  believe  that these  levels are  reasonable
measures of adequate levels of insurance.


ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     On August 7, 2001, a former  officer of the Company  filed an action in the
District Court of Arapahoe County, Colorado,  against the Company and its former
President and CEO, John Yeros,  entitled  Barry J. McDonald v. Medix  Resources,
Inc f/k/a/  International  Nursing  Services,  Inc.  and John  Yeros,  (Case No.
01CV2119).  The plaintiff alleges (1) breach of an employment agreement, a stock
option  agreement and the related  stock option plan,  (2) breach of the duty of
good faith and fair  dealing,  and (3) violation of the Colorado Wage Claim Act.
Plaintiff seeks  unspecified  damages to be determined at jury trial,  including
interest, punitive damages,  plaintiff's attorneys fees, and a 50% penalty under
the Colorado Wage Claim Act. The Company's  and its  co-defendant  have answered
the plaintiff's complaint, denying any liability. The Court has set discovery to
be  completed  by July 31,  2002,  and the trial to begin on  September 9, 2002.
Management of the Company intends to vigorously  defend this action and does not
expect any  resolution of this matter to have a material  adverse  effect on the
Company's results of operations or financial condition.

     On December 17, 2001,  Plaintiff,  Vision  Management  Consulting,  L.L.C.,
filed suit against us in the Superior Court of New Jersey,  Law Division - Essex
County, entitled Vision Management Consulting,  L.L.C v. Medix Resources,  Inc.,
Docket No.  ESX-L-11438-01.  The complaint  alleges  breach of contract,  unjust
enrichment,   breach  of  the  duty  of  good   faith  and  fair   dealing   and
misrepresentations  by us in connection with a negotiated  settlement agreement,
which  had  resulted  from  claims  between  the  parties  arising  out  of  the
termination of operations by our Automated  Design Concepts  division earlier in
2001.  Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages to be proven at jury trial,  together
with attorneys fees, costs of suit and interest on the judgment, as well as such
further  relief as the Court  deems just and  equitable.  We have  answered  the
plaintiff's  complaint,  denying any liability and setting forth a  counterclaim
seeking the award to us of our costs of  defending  this action and such further
relief as the Court  deems just and  proper.  Management  intends to  vigorously
defend this action and does not expect any  resolution  of this matter to have a
material  adverse  effect on the  Company's  results of  operations or financial
condition.  The Court has appointed a mediator for the case to try to facilitate
a settlement between the parties.

     From time to time,  the Company is involved in claims and  litigation  that
arise out of the normal course of business.  Currently,  other than as discussed
above,  there are no pending  matters  that in  Management's  judgment  might be
considered  potentially  material to us. Management does not believe that any of
the  litigation  described  above  will have a  material  adverse  effect on the
Company.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     The following matters were submitted to our shareholders at the 2001 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders held on October 16, 2001:

Proposal #1          Election of Directors
                                                 For              Withheld
                       Joan E. Herman        45,231,857            181,986
                     Patrick W. Jeffries     45,231,857            181,986
                       John R. Prufeta       45,231,857            181,986
                        Guy L. Scalzi        45,232,126            181,717


Proposal #2 Ratification and approval of the Board of Director's increase in the
            number of shares authorized and reserved for issuance under the
            Company's 1999 Stock Option Plan from 10 million shares of the Company's
            common stock to 13 million shares.

                       For           Against        Abstained       Not Voted
                   11,371,866       1,944,632        251,501       31,845,844

Proposal #3  Ratification  of the  selection  by the Board of Directors of Ehrhardt
             Keefe  Steiner  &  Hottman  PC  as  the  Company's   independent   public
             accountants,  to audit the  financial  statements  of the Company for the
             2001 fiscal year.

                       For           Against        Abstained
                   45,117,923        171,218         124,702


                                     PART II


ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER  MATTERS

     On April 6,  2000,  our common  stock was  listed and began  trading on The
American  Stock  Exchange under the symbol "MXR." Prior to that our common stock
was traded on the OTC  Bulletin  Board under the symbol  "MDIX."  The  following
table shows high ask and low bid price  information for each quarter in the last
two calendar years as reported by Prophet Information Services, Inc., a provider
of online  historical  stock price data for all major U. S. securities  markets.
Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-ups,  markdowns
or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.  On March
15, 2001, the last sales price was reported to be $0.55.

                                Common Stock Price
                                ------------------
                                 High        Low
                                 ----        ---
2000
- -----
    First Quarter                $9.50      $1.88
    Second Quarter                4.87       1.68
    Third Quarter                 3.62       1.06
    Fourth Quarter                2.37        .75

2001
- ----
   First Quarter                 $1.62        .52
   Second Quarter                 1.49        .41
   Third Quarter                  1.36        .50
   Fourth Quarter                 1.09        .49


     There were  approximately  400 holders of record (and  approximately  9,000
beneficial  owners)  of our  common  stock as of March 15,  2002.  The number of
record  holders  includes  shareholders  who may hold  stock for the  benefit of
others.

     We do  not  expect  to  pay  any  dividends  on  its  common  stock  in the
foreseeable future.  Management  currently intends to retain all available funds
for the development of its business and for use as working capital.  The payment
of dividends on the common stock is subject to our prior  payment of all accrued
and unpaid dividends on any preferred stock outstanding.


ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     The following  consolidated selected financial data, at the end of the last
five fiscal years, should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements  and related Notes thereto  appearing  elsewhere in this Report.  The
consolidated selected financial data are derived from our consolidated financial
statements  which have been audited by Ehrhardt  Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, our
independent auditors, as indicated in their report included herein. The selected
financial  data  provided  below is not  necessarily  indicative  of our  future
results of operations or financial performance.

                            2001         2000(1)         1999          1998(2)         1997
                      -------------  ------------  --------------  ---------------  ------------

Operating revenues         29,000       326,000         24,000       17,412,000     24,875,000

Software research       1,075,000       685,000        596,000          780,000              0
 and development
 costs (3)

(Loss) or profit      (10,636,000)   (6,344,000)    (5,422,000)        (515,000)       610,000
 from continuing
 operations

(Loss) or profit             (.21)         (.15)          (.29)            (.15)           .06
 from continuing
 operations per share

Total assets            3,101,000     5,089,000      4,629,000        5,175,000     10,140,000

Working Capital        (1,404,000)      394,000        644,000       (2,612,000)      (329,000)

Long-term obligations           0             0        400,000                0              0

Stockholders' Equity    1,345,000     4,202,000      2,376,000         (218,000)     4,504,000
 (Deficit)

The  following  is  supplementary   information  related  to  software  development
expenses

                        2001       2000(1)        1999        1998(2)      1997
                    -----------  -----------  ----------- ------------ -------------
Software
 Development Costs:

Software research    1,075,000      685,000     596,000      780,000        0
 and development
 costs (3)

Capitalized            434,000      495,000           0            0        0
 software
 development costs

Total Software       1,512,000    1,180,000     596,000      780,000        0
 development costs
 incurred


(1)  In February of 2000, we disposed of our remaining medical staffing business
     and became  solely a  developer  of software  for our own use in  providing
     Internet based communications for the medical services industry.
(2)  In January of 1998, we acquired the Cymedix software business and began the
     process of disposing of our medical staffing business.
(3)  Excludes amortization of previously capitalized development software  costs
     which  are  included  in  cost  of  services in the  Company's Statement of
     Operations


ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL  CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATION

Overview

     We are an information  technology  company  headquartered in New York City,
with  offices in Agoura  Hills,  California,  Greenwood  Village,  Colorado  and
Marietta, Georgia. We specialize in the development, marketing and management of
software and  connectivity  solutions  for  clinical  and business  transactions
within the healthcare industry Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Cymedix Lynx
Corporation,  a Colorado  corporation,  we have developed  Cymedix(R),  a unique
healthcare  communication  technology  product.  Created by a team of healthcare
professionals, Cymedix software provides healthcare institutions, such as health
plans, insurers and hospitals,  as well as practicing physicians,  with a set of
non-invasive  technology tools to enable Internet-based health care transactions
among all parties.

     Implementation  of the Cymedix software suite promises to speed and improve
the efficacy of daily  interactions  between health caregivers and their staffs,
other ancillary providers (such as labs or pharmacy benefit managers), insurance
companies,  hospitals, Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs) and Health Management
Organizations  (HMOs).  We believe  that the  market  for  robust and  practical
healthcare solutions will grow rapidly, and that segment growth will continue to
accelerate as the joined emphases of consumer  choice,  quality,  administrative
service  and cost  containment  ratchets up demand for ever more  efficient  and
user-friendly methods of delivering quality healthcare.

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks

     This  Report  contains  forward-looking  statements,  which  mean that such
statements  relate to events or  transactions  that have not yet  occurred,  our
expectations  or estimates for our future  operations and economic  performance,
our  growth  strategies  or  business  plans or other  events  that have not yet
occurred.  Such  statements  can be  identified  by the  use of  forward-looking
terminology  such as "might," "may," "will,"  "could,"  "expect,"  "anticipate,"
"estimate,"  "likely," "believe," or "continue" or the negative thereof or other
variations thereon or comparable  terminology.  The following paragraphs contain
discussions  of  important  factors  that should be  considered  by  prospective
investors for their potential impact on forward-looking  statements  included in
this Report. These important factors,  among others, may cause actual results to
differ  materially  and adversely  from the results  expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements.

     We  have   reported  net  losses  of   ($10,636,000),   ($5,415,000),   and
($4,847,000)  for the years  ended  December  31,  2001,  December  31, 2000 and
December 31, 1999,  respectively.  At December 31, 2001,  we had an  accumulated
deficit of  ($33,412,000),  and negative working capital of ($1,404,000).  These
factors  and other  concerns  have  caused our  accountants  to include a "going
concern"  exception  in their  report  in  connection  with  their  audit of our
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001.

     We expect to continue to experience  losses,  in the near term,  until such
time  as our  Cymedix(R)software  products  can be  successfully  deployed  with
customers  and produce  revenue.  The current  operation of our business and our
ability to continue to develop and market our  Cymedix  software  products  will
depend upon our ability to obtain additional  financing.  At present, we are not
receiving  any  significant  revenues  from  the  sale of our  Cymedix  software
products.  We are  attempting  to meet our  current  cash flow  needs by raising
capital in the private  debt and equity  markets  and  through  the  exercise of
currently  outstanding  warrants.  The  development and marketing of the Cymedix
software  products  require  substantial  capital  investments.  There can be no
assurance that  additional  investments or financings will be available to us as
needed to support the  development of Cymedix  products.  Failure to obtain such
capital on a timely basis could result in lost business opportunities,  the sale
of the Cymedix  business at a distressed  price or the financial  failure of our
company.

     We  have  recently  entered  into  a  secured  financing  arrangement.  See
"BUSINESS - Recent  Developments." The use of secured  borrowings  increases the
risk of loss of the assets used to secure the borrowing.  If an event of default
occurs under the security agreement, the lender will be able to foreclose on the
assets used to secure the borrowing and sell those assets to the highest bidder.
In  addition,  it is  generally  believed  that  foreclosure  sales,  which  are
"distress  sales",  will not maximize the proceeds  that are paid for the assets
being  sold.  The loan we  entered  into is  secured  by the grant of a security
interest in all Medix's intellectual property,  including its patent, copyrights
and trademarks.  While Medix can cure a payment default by the forced conversion
of the loan into its common stock, a bankruptcy or similar event of default will
trigger the foreclosure provision of the security agreement.

     We are still in the process of gaining  experience  in  marketing  software
products,  providing software support services,  evaluating demand for products,
financing a software business and dealing with government regulation of software
products.  While we are putting together a team of experienced executives,  they
have come from  different  backgrounds  and may require  some time to develop an
efficient  operating structure and corporate culture for our company. We believe
our structure of multiple offices serves our customers well, but it does present
an  additional  challenge  in  building  our  corporate  culture  and  operating
structure.

     Our products are in the integration and deployment  stages, and have proven
their  effectiveness  with some sponsors.  We have not yet proven our technology
with a significant number of physicians. As a developer of software products, we
will be required to anticipate and adapt to evolving industry  standards and new
technological   developments.   The  market  for  our   software   products   is
characterized by continued and rapid technological advances in both hardware and
software   development,   requiring   ongoing   expenditures  for  research  and
development,  and  timely  introduction  of new  products  and  enhancements  to
existing products.  The establishment of standards is largely a function of user
acceptance. Therefore, such standards are subject to change. Our future success,
if any, will depend in part upon our ability to enhance  existing  products,  to
respond  effectively  to technology  changes,  and to introduce new products and
technologies  to meet  the  evolving  needs  of its  clients  in the  healthcare
information systems market.

     The  success of our  products  and  services in  generating  revenue may be
subject to the quality and completeness of the data that is generated and stored
by  the  physician  or  other  healthcare  professional  and  entered  into  our
interconnectivity  systems,  including  the  failure  to  input  appropriate  or
accurate information. Failure or unwillingness by the healthcare professional to
accommodate the required information quality may result in the payor refusing to
pay Medix for its services.

     The  introduction of software  products in that market has been slow due to
the large number of small  practitioners who are resistant to change, as well as
the  financial  investment  or workflow  interruptions  associated  with change,
particularly  in a period of rising  pressure to reduce costs in the market.  We
are currently devoting significant resources toward the development of products.
There can be no assurance that we will successfully  complete the development of
these products in a timely  fashion or that our current or future  products will
satisfy the needs of the healthcare  information systems market.  Further, there
can be no assurance that products or  technologies  developed by others will not
adversely affect our competitive position or render our products or technologies
noncompetitive or obsolete.

     Certain  of our  products  provide  applications  that  relate  to  patient
medication histories and treatment plans. Any failure by our products to provide
accurate, secure and timely information could result in product liability claims
against us by our clients or their affiliates or patients. We maintain insurance
that we believe  currently is adequate to protect against claims associated with
the use of our  products,  but  there  can be no  assurance  that our  insurance
coverage would  adequately  cover any claim  asserted  against us. The limits of
that coverage is $2,000,000 in the aggregate and  $1,000,000 per  occurrence.  A
successful  claim brought  against us in excess of our insurance  coverage could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
or business.  Even unsuccessful  claims could result in the expenditure of funds
in litigation, as well as diversion of management time and resources.

     We have been granted  certain  patent  rights,  trademarks  and  copyrights
relating to its software  business.  However,  patent and intellectual  property
legal issues for software  programs,  such as the Cymedix products,  are complex
and currently  evolving.  Since patent applications are secret until patents are
issued,  in the United States,  or published,  in other countries,  we cannot be
sure that we are first to file any patent application. In addition, there can be
no assurance that competitors,  many of which have far greater resources than we
do, will not apply for and obtain  patents that will  interfere with our ability
to develop or market product ideas that we have originated. Further, the laws of
certain foreign countries do not provide the protection to intellectual property
that is provided in the United  States,  and may limit our ability to market our
products overseas.  We cannot give any assurance that the scope of the rights we
have are broad enough to fully protect our Cymedix software from infringement.

     Litigation  or  regulatory  proceedings  may be  necessary  to protect  our
intellectual  property  rights,  such as the scope of our patent.  In fact,  the
computer   software   industry  in  general  is   characterized  by  substantial
litigation.  Such  litigation and regulatory  proceedings are very expensive and
could be a significant  drain on our resources and divert resources from product
development.  There is no assurance that we will have the financial resources to
defend our patent rights or other  intellectual  property from  infringement  or
claims of  invalidity.  We have been  notified by a party that it  believes  our
pharmacy  product may infringe on patents that it holds. We have retained patent
counsel who has made a preliminary investigation and determined that our product
does not infringe on the  identified  patents.  At this time no legal action has
been instituted.

     We also rely upon unpatented proprietary technology and no assurance can be
given  that  others  will not  independently  develop  substantially  equivalent
proprietary  information  and techniques or otherwise gain access to or disclose
our  proprietary  technology or that we can  meaningfully  protect our rights in
such unpatented proprietary technology.  We will use our best efforts to protect
such  information and techniques,  however,  no assurance can be given that such
efforts will be  successful.  The failure to protect our  intellectual  property
could cause us to lose  substantial  revenues and to fail to reach our financial
potential over the long term.

     The healthcare and medical  services  industry in the United States is in a
period  of  rapid  change  and  uncertainty.  Governmental  programs  have  been
proposed,  and some adopted, from time to time, to reform various aspects of the
U.S.  healthcare  delivery system.  Some of these programs contain  proposals to
increase  government  involvement in healthcare,  lower  reimbursement rates and
otherwise  change the operating  environment  for our  customers.  Particularly,
HIPAA and the regulations that are being promulgated  thereunder are causing the
healthcare industry to change its procedures and incur substantial cost in doing
so.  Although  we expect  these  regulations  to have the  beneficial  effect of
spurring adoption of our software products, we cannot predict with any certainty
what  impact,  if any,  these and future  healthcare  reforms  might have on our
software business. See "BUSINESS - Governmental Regulation."

     In connection with our equity line of credit financing,  we have registered
9,500,000  additional  shares  with  the SEC for  sale by the  providers  of the
financing,  of which 5,031,371  shares remain available for issuance as of March
15,  2002.  The  resale of the  common  stock that may be issued by us under the
equity line of credit will  substantially  increase  the number of our  publicly
traded shares ("float").  If existing  shareholders perceive that this increased
float is not  accompanied  by a  commensurate  increase in value to the Company,
then shareholder  value--real or perceived--will be diluted. Such dilution could
cause holders of our shares of common stock to sell,  thus  depressing the price
of our common stock. Therefore,  the very existence of the equity line financing
could depress the market price of our common stock.

     The resale of the  common  stock that will be issued by us under our equity
line of credit financing could depress the market price of our common stock. The
terms of the equity line provide that we will sell shares of our common stock to
the  providers of the financing at 91% of the average of the three lowest of the
daily  volume-weighted  average prices of our common stock during the 22-trading
day period immediately before our request for the advance.  Therefore, since all
of the shares that are issued by us in connection with advances under the equity
line  financing  will have a "built-in"  discount of at least 9% upon  issuance,
this could  produce an impetus  for the  providers  of the equity line to resell
their  shares  sooner or in greater  quantity  than they would  otherwise.  Such
resale could have the effect of  depressing  our share price.  At March 15, 2002
the Company had issued  2,748,552  shares to the equity line  providers,  all of
which has been sold into the  public  market.  Trading  activity  related to the
liquidation of these shares shown little  correlation  to downward  movements in
share price.

     As of March 15, 2002, we had 58,386,516 shares of common stock outstanding.
As of that date, approximately 24,117,525 shares were issuable upon the exercise
of  outstanding  options,  warrants  or  other  rights,  and the  conversion  of
preferred stock. Most of these shares will be immediately saleable upon exercise
or  conversion  under  registration  statements  we have filed with the SEC. The
exercise  prices of options,  warrants or other  rights to acquire  common stock
presently  outstanding range from $0.19 per share to $4.97 per share. During the
respective terms of the outstanding options, warrants, preferred stock and other
outstanding  derivative  securities,  the holders are given the  opportunity  to
profit from a rise in the market price of the common stock,  and the exercise of
any options, warrants or other rights may dilute the book value per share of the
common stock and put  downward  pressure on the price of the common  stock.  The
existence of the options,  conversion  rights,  or any outstanding  warrants may
adversely affect the terms on which we may obtain  additional  equity financing.
Moreover,  the holders of such securities are likely to exercise their rights to
acquire common stock at a time when we would otherwise be able to obtain capital
on terms  more  favorable  than  could  be  obtained  through  the  exercise  or
conversion of such securities.  See also the impact of our equity line of credit
financing discussed in the following paragraphs.

     As with any business,  growth in absolute  amounts of selling,  general and
administrative  expenses or the occurrence of  extraordinary  events could cause
actual results to vary materially and adversely from the results contemplated by
the  forward-looking  statements.  Budgeting and other management  decisions are
subjective  in many  respects and thus  susceptible  to incorrect  decisions and
periodic   revisions   based  on  actual   experience   and  external   business
developments,  the impact of which may cause us to alter our marketing,  capital
expenditures  or other  budgets,  which  may,  in turn,  affect  our  results of
operation.  Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect
to, among other things, future economic,  competitive and market conditions, and
future business  decisions,  all of which are difficult or impossible to predict
accurately  and many of which are beyond our  control.  Although  we believe the
assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the
assumptions  could prove  inaccurate,  and therefore,  there can be no assurance
that  the  results  contemplated  in  the  forward-looking  statements  will  be
realized.

     In light of the significant  uncertainties  inherent in the forward-looking
information  included herein,  the inclusion of such  information  should not be
regarded as a  representation  by us or any other person that our  objectives or
plans for the Company will be achieved.

Results of Operation

Comparison of years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000

     Total revenues  decreased  approximately  $297,000 from $326,000 in 2000 to
$29,000 in 2001. The decrease is due to a decrease in Cymedix pilot program fees
billed  during 2001 of $189,000,  and a decrease in ADC revenue of $108,000 as a
result of discontinuing that business segment.

     Direct costs of services increased  approximately  $33,000 from $180,000 in
2000 to $213,000 in 2000.  The increase is due to  amortization  of  capitalized
software development costs related to Cymedix.

     Software  development  costs increased  approximately  57% from $685,000 in
2000 to  $1,075,000  in 2000,  as a  result  of costs  incurred  in the  ongoing
development of the Cymedix product line.

     Selling,  general and administrative  expenses  decreased  approximately 3%
from $5,925,000 in 2000 to $5,746,000 in 2001. The decrease is attributable to a
company wide salary reduction program that was undertaken early in 2001.

     During  2001,  the  Company  recorded   impairment  expense  of  $1,111,000
resulting from the  discontinuance  of its Automated  Design  Concepts  division
which  totaled  $443,000,  to focus staff  resources  on the  Company's  primary
technology,  and  the  cancellation  of its  Zirmed  license  totaling  $668,000
agreement which was a result of management's assessment that the Company's needs
would be better served by superior technology.

     Other  income  decreased  approximately  $151,000  from 2000 to 2001.  This
increase  reflects a decline in  interest  income that had been earned on excess
cash  received  and  invested  during  2000 from the  exercise  of  options  and
warrants.

     Interest expense  increased  $61,000 from 2000 to 2001 due to interest that
was paid on a convertible promissory note issued during 2001.

     Financing  costs of $2,428,000 were incurred in 2001 due to warrants issued
and an in-the money  conversion  feature in connection with the convertible debt
credit  facility of $581,000,  a warrant issued in the private equity  placement
valued at  $113,000,  and shares  issued in the  conversion  of debt and related
equity  share  issuances  at below  market  prices  which  resulted  in costs of
$1,734,000.

     Net  gain  (loss)  from  discontinued  operations  decreased  approximately
$929,000  from $929,000 in 2000 to $0 in 2001,  due to the sale during  February
2000 of the remaining assets of the company's staffing operations.

     Net loss  increased  approximately  $5,221,000  from  $5,415,000 in 2000 to
$10,636,000 in 2001 due to the reasons discussed above.

Comparison of years ended December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999

     Total  revenues  increased  approximately  $302,000 from $24,000 in 1999 to
$326,000 in 2000.  The  increase  is due to Cymedix  pilot  program  fees billed
during  2000,  and ADC  revenue  from the date of  acquisition  (March 8,  2000)
through December 31, 2000.

     Direct costs of services  increased  approximately  $178,000 from $2,000 in
1999 to $180,000 in 2000.  The increase is due to  amortization  of  capitalized
software  development  costs  related to Cymedix of  $124,000,  as well as costs
associated  with ADC revenue of $16,000,  from the period  March 8, 2000 through
December 31, 2000.

     Software  development  costs increased  approximately  15% from $596,000 in
1999 to  $685,000  in  2000,  as a  result  of  costs  incurred  in the  ongoing
development  of the Cymedix  product line.  During the third quarter of 2000 the
company began capitalizing and amortizing software development costs.

     Selling,  general and administrative  expenses increased  approximately 57%
from  $3,777,000 in 1999 to $5,925,000 in 2000. The increase is due primarily to
an increase in executive  management and operational salaries and benefits as of
$1,088,000,  as well as  consulting  fees  related to employee  recruitment  and
placement of $272,000, and legal, accounting and advisory services of $248,000.

     Net loss from operations increased approximately $2,113,000 from $4,351,000
in 1999 to $6,464,000  in 2000.  This increase is primarily due to the increases
in selling, general and administrative expenses described above.

     Other  income  increased  approximately  $156,000  from 1999 to 2000.  This
increase  reflects  interest  income on excess cash received and invested during
the year from the exercise of options and warrants.

     Interest expense decreased 79%, or approximately $161,000 from 1999 to 2000
due to  interest  that was paid and  imputed on a  convertible  promissory  note
during 1999.

     Net loss from continuing operations increased approximately $1,796,000 from
$4,548,000  in 1999 to  $6,344,000  in 2000 due to all of the reasons  discussed
above.

     Net gain (loss) from discontinued  operations increased  approximately 411%
or  $1,228,000  from  $(299,000)  in 1999 to $929,000  in 2000,  due to the sale
during  February  2000  of  the  remaining  assets  of  the  company's  staffing
operations.

     Net  loss  increased  approximately  $568,000  from  $4,847,000  in 1999 to
$5,415,000 in 2000 due to the reasons discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     We had $8,000 in cash as of December  31, 2001  compared to  $1,007,000  in
cash as of December 31, 2000 and $1,229,000 as of December 31, 1999. Net working
capital  was  ($1,404,000)  as of December  31, 2001  compared to $394,000 as of
December 31, 2000 and $644,000 as of December  31, 1999.  During 2001,  net cash
used in operating  activities  was  $5,397,000  compared to  $5,173,000 in 2000.
During 2001, we raised $1,500,000 from a convertible note financing,  $1,200,000
from private placements of our common stock,  $1,510,000 from our equity line of
credit and $369,000  from  exercise of options and  warrants.  During  2000,  we
raised  $6,091,000  from the exercise of options and  warrants.  During 1999, we
raised  $4,112,000  from private  placements of preferred  stock,  $500,000 from
issuance of a convertible promissory note, and $150,000 from exercise of options
and warrants.

     Subsequent   to  year-end  and  through   March  15,   2002,   we  received
approximately $3,800 from the exercise of options and warrants,  $1,000,000 from
a  secured  convertible  note  financing,  and  $883,000  from our  equity  line
financing.  As of March 15, 2002, we had  outstanding  warrants  exercisable for
5,136,000  shares of  common  stock,  exercisable  at $0.50  per  share,  with a
aggregate  exercise price of $2,568,000  which are callable for $.01 per warrant
upon thirty days written  notice.  However,  no  assurance  can be given that if
called such warrants  would be exercised.  From time to time,  members of senior
management  have  made  short-term  loans  to us to  meet  payroll  obligations.
However, there is no commitment to continue that practice.

     We will  continue  to have  financing  costs  charged to our  statement  of
operations  in the  future  for  convertible  debt we  issue  with  in-the-money
conversion features.

     Currently, we are funding our development and deployment activities through
an equity line of credit financing.  Draws under this financing are triggered by
a "Put Notice"  (advance  request)  initiated by ourselves  each time we wish to
draw funds. The financing  investors are committed to accept the advance request
provided  certain  conditions  are met, some of which may be waived by agreement
among the parties.  Such advance request  obligates us to issue to the investors
shares  of our  common  stock  at a  discount  to  market  which is fixed in the
contract.  The shares are  immediately  re-saleable in the public markets by the
investors.  As of March 15, 2002, we had received  $2,584,910 in advances,  from
which  offering  expenses of $191,278 was paid under the  financing,  and we had
issued to the  investors  4,468,629  shares of our common stock  relating to the
advances  and an  additional  542,847  shares  to their  affiliates  as fees for
arranging the equity line  facility.  The shares  issued  pursuant to the equity
line advances to date have been priced from $0.46 to $0.77 per share.

     We expect to  continue to  experience  loses and  negative  cash flows from
operations,  in the near term, until such time as we are deployed on physicians'
desktops in  sufficient  numbers to cover our overhead The current  operation of
our  business  and our  ability to  continue  to further  develop and deploy our
Cymedix  software  products  will depend  upon our ability to obtain  additional
financing.  At present,  we are not receiving any significant  revenues from the
sale of our Cymedix  software  products.  We are  attempting to meet our current
cash flow needs by raising  capital in the private  debt and equity  markets and
through the exercise of currently  outstanding  warrants.  The  development  and
marketing  of  the  Cymedix  software  products  require   substantial   capital
investments.  There can be no assurance that additional funding, if needed, will
be  available  on terms  acceptable  to us, or at all.  Failure  to obtain  such
capital on a timely basis could result in lost business opportunities,  the sale
of the Cymedix  business at a distressed  price or the financial  failure of our
company.

ITEM 7A.       QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     The  Company  does not hold or  engage in  transactions  with  market  risk
sensitive instruments


ITEM 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

     Attached hereto and filed as a part of this Form 10-K are our  Consolidated
Financial Statements, beginning on page F-1.


ITEM 9.     CHANGES  IN  AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  ACCOUNTING  AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

      None




                                    PART III


ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Directors and Executive Officers

     Our directors and executive  officers,  as of the March 15, 2002, and their
biographical information are set forth below:

         Name               Date of Birth          Position                   Director Since
- ------------------------- ----------------   -------------------------       -----------------


John R. Prufeta (1)(4)(5)     7/1/60          President, Chief Executive           1999
                                              Officer and a Director

Louis E. Hyman                1/15/68         Executive Vice President and          N.A.
                                              Chief Technology Officer

Patricia A. Minicucci         4/1/49          Executive Vice President for          N.A.
                                              Operations

Gary L. Smith                 6/2/54          Executive Vice President and          N.A.
                                              Chief Financial Officer

Brian R. Ellacott             3/8/57          Senior Vice President and             N.A.
                                              Division CEO, Southeast
                                              Region

John T. Lane (1)(2)(3)(4)     4/13/42         Director and Chairman of             1999
                                              The Board

Samuel H. Havens (4)(5)       6/19/43         Director and Chair of the            1999
                                              Nominating Committee

Joan E. Herman (2)(3)         6/2/53          Director and Chair of the            2000
                                              Audit Committee

Patrick  W. Jeffries(4)       1/25/53         Director and Chair of the            2001
                                              Finance Committee

Guy L. Scalzi(5)              7/18/46         Director                             2001


Dr. David B. Skinner (1) (3) (24/28/35        Director and Chair of the            1999
                                              Compensation Committee

(1)   Member of the Executive Committee
(2)   Member of the Audit Committee
(3)   Member of the Compensation Committee
(4)   Member of the Finance Committee
(5)   Member of Nominating Committee

     All of  the  our  executive  officers  devote  full-time  to our  company's
business and affairs. Biographical information on each current executive officer
and director is set forth below.

Biographical Information

John R. Prufeta.  Mr.  Prufeta joined the Company as a full time employee and as
its President and Chief Executive  Officer on March 1, 2000. Mr. Prufeta also is
the Chairman of the Board of the Company's Cymedix Lynx subsidiary.  He had been
appointed to the position of Chief  Executive  Officer while a consultant to the
Company in October 1999.  Prior to that he was the Managing  General  Partner of
The Creative  Group,  Creative Health  Concepts,  and TCG  Development,  and the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Creative  Management  Strategies,  Inc.
for over 11 years. Those affiliated  companies cover a wide spectrum of services
within  the  healthcare  industry.  He was  elected  to the  Company's  Board of
Directors in April 1999. A 1983 graduate of St. John's University with a B.S. in
management,  Mr. Prufeta  graduated from the Executive  Program,  OPM at Harvard
University, Graduate School of Business.

Louis E. Hyman. On May 14, 2001, Mr. Hyman became an officer of the Company with
the titles of Executive Vice President and Chief  Technology  Officer.  Prior to
that,  since  March 9, 2001,  he was a  consultant  to the  Company,  serving as
interim Chief Technology  Officer.  From September 1999 until joining Medix, Mr.
Hyman  was  President  and  CEO  of  Ideal  Technologies,   Inc.,  a  healthcare
integration  consulting  firm. Mr. Hyman held senior  technology  management and
executive positions with CareInsite, Inc. (from August 1999 to September 2000 as
Vice  President of  Information  Technology)  and LaPook Lear Systems Inc. (from
August 1992 to August 1999 as Vice President and Director of  Technology),  both
of which were merged into WebMD,  Inc. in September  2000.  As a result of these
transactions, Mr. Hyman maintained his position as Vice President of Information
Technology  with  WebMD  through  November  2000,  where he played a key role in
WebMD's  integration  efforts as well as  initiatives  to improve the  Company's
profitability.  He graduated Summa Cum Laude from St. John's University where he
earned a B.S. degree in Computer Science.

Patricia  A.  Minicucci.  In March  2000,  Ms.  Minicucci  joined the Company as
Executive  Vice  President of Operations.  Prior to joining  Medix's staff,  Ms.
Minicucci  served as Executive Vice President and a principal of Creative Health
Concepts.  In 1995,  she  founded  and was Chief  Executive  Officer of Practice
Paradigms,  an organization  serving primary care physicians.  Prior to founding
Practice Paradigms, Minicucci was Senior Vice President-Managed Care with Empire
Blue Cross Blue Shield and,  before that,  President  of the  Employee  Benefits
Division of Washington National  Corporation.  Ms. Minicucci began her career in
healthcare at CIGNA  Corporation  where she held numerous  positions,  including
President of the South Central  Division,  CIGNA Healthplan Inc.; Vice President
of the Human Resources Division,  Employee Benefits Group; Vice President of the
Human  Resources  Department,   Group  Insurance  Division;  and  Regional  Vice
President of Field Claim Operations,  Group Insurance Division. She holds a B.A.
in History from Russell Sage College.

Gary L. Smith.  Mr.  Smith joined the Company as Executive  Vice  President  and
Chief  Financial  Officer in December of 2000.  From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Smith was
with Provident Group, a financial  advisory firm serving companies  operating in
emerging market countries,  where he was a principal.  Previously, Mr. Smith was
an executive of American  Express  Bank,  the  international  banking arm of the
financial services  conglomerate American Express Corporation (NYSE: AXP), where
he held various senior financial positions, most recently as Senior Director and
Commercial  Banking Head,  London Branch. He holds a BS degree in Economics from
the Wharton School and an MS in Accounting and Finance from the London School of
Economics.

Brian R. Ellacott. In March 2000, Mr. Ellacott joined the Company as Senior Vice
President of Business  Development.  In mid-2001,  Mr. Ellacott was appointed as
the Division CEO for Southeast Region Markets.  Mr. Ellacott served as president
of Cosmetic  Surgery  Consultants  from November 1998 until March 2000,  when he
joined Medix  Resources,  Inc. From 1996 to 1998 he was executive vice president
of  Alignis  Inc.,  an  alternative   healthcare   PPO.   Before  that,  he  was
President-Bibb  Hospitality  (Atlanta) for The Bibb Company.  Mr. Ellacott began
his career in healthcare at Baxter International/American  Hospital Supply where
he held numerous  positions,  including Director of National Accounts (Chicago);
Director of  Marketing  (Australia);  Director of  Marketing  (Canada);  Systems
Manager  (Canada);  Regional  Manager  (British  Columbia);  and Product Manager
(hospital products).  He holds a B.A. in Business  Administration,  with Honors,
from Wilfrid Laurier University (Waterloo, Canada).

John T. Lane.  Prior to his retirement  from J.P.  Morgan & Company in 1994, Mr.
Lane was head of that  firm's  U.S.  Private  Clients  Group.  He also served as
Chairman of J.P. Morgan,  Florida;  a Director of Morgan  Shareholder  Services,
J.P. Morgan of California, and Morgan Futures; and a member of the firm's Credit
Policy  committee.  Earlier,  he held a number of  positions in the J. P. Morgan
organization, which he joined in 1968. Since retiring from J.P. Morgan, Lane has
served as a consultant to various  organizations.  Mr. Lane currently  serves or
the Boards of Acme Metals  Incorporated  and  Biospecifics  Technologies  Corp.,
whose common shares are publicly  traded.  Mr. Lane holds an MBA degree from the
University of Michigan, and a BA degree from Dartmouth College.

Samuel  H.  Havens.  Prior to his  retirement  in 1996,  Mr.  Havens  served  as
President of Prudential  Healthcare for five years. He had begun his career with
The Prudential  Insurance  Company as a group sales  representative in 1965, and
served in various posts in Prudential  healthcare operations over three decades.
Since  retiring,  Mr.  Havens  has  served on the Board and as a  consultant  to
various  healthcare  organizations.  He is a member of the Board of  Advisors of
Temple Law School and the  Editorial  Board of Managed  Care  Quarterly.  Havens
completed  the  Executive   Program  in  Business   Administration  at  Columbia
University. He holds a JD degree from Temple Law School, a CLU from the American
College of Life Underwriters, and a BA degree from Hamilton College.

Joan E.  Herman.  Ms  Herman  is the  Group  President  of  WellPoint's  Senior,
Specialty,  and State  Sponsored  Programs  division and is responsible  for the
Company's  Dental,   Life  &  AD&D,   Pharmacy,   Behavioral  Health,   Workers'
Compensation Managed Care Services,  Senior Services, and Disability businesses.
She is also responsible for WellPoint's State Sponsored Programs,  which include
MediCal and Healthy  Families.  In 1999, a WellPoint  affiliate  entered into an
agreement with the Company to implement a pilot program for the  introduction of
Cymedix(R) software to healthcare  providers  identified by such affiliate.  Ms.
Herman serves on the Company's Board of Directors  pursuant to the terms of that
agreement.  Prior to joining  WellPoint in 1998,  Ms. Herman was the Senior Vice
President,  Strategic Development and Senior Vice President, Group Insurance for
Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company. Ms. Herman has served as chairman of
the  board of  Leadership  Greater  Hartford  and been a member  of the board of
directors of the American Academy of Actuaries,  the American  Leadership Forum,
the Hartford Ballet, the Greater Hartford Arts Council,  and the Children's Fund
of  Connecticut.  She is a member of the  American  Academy of  Actuaries  and a
Fellow of the Society of Actuaries.  Ms. Herman holds an MA in Mathematics  from
Yale  University,  an MBA from  Western  New  England  College,  and an A.B.  in
mathematics from Barnard College.

Patrick W.  Jeffries.  In March 2002,  Mr.  Jeffries  became the Executive  Vice
President  for IT and Central  Services of WellPoint  Health  Networks  Inc. Mr.
Jeffries  is the  founding  partner  of Health  Technology  Partners,  LLC and a
predecessor company,  which was founded in 1997 and provides consulting services
for  healthcare and  technology  companies.  From August 1997 to March 1999, Mr.
Jeffries was the CEO and Chairman of the Board of OpTx Corporation, during which
time he lead this  disease  management  company  in its  transition  from a late
development  stage  company to commercial  profitability.  From December 1995 to
July 1997,  he was  Executive  Vice  President of Salick  Health  Care,  Inc., a
national system of cancer treatment facilities.  From 1985 to 1995, Mr. Jeffries
was first an  associate  and then a partner  of  McKinsey &  Company,  Inc.,  an
international   management  consulting  firm.  He  holds  an  MBA  from  Cornell
University and a BSEE from Washington University.

Guy L. Scalzi. Mr. Scalzi is Vice President of First Consulting Group Management
Services, LLC, a healthcare information technology consultant.  Prior to joining
that company in January 2000, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Information
Officer for New York Presbyterian  Healthcare System from April 1996 to December
1999.  From January 1995 to March 1996,  Mr. Scalzi was Director of Planning for
Information Services at New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. From June 1993
to December  1994,  he was Chief  Information  Officer,  The  Hospital for Joint
Diseases,  New York  University  Medical  Center.  From  1984 to 1993,  he was a
founder and senior executive with DataEase International, Inc., an international
PC  software  development  and  marketing  company.  Mr.  Scalzi has an MBA from
Manhattan  College and a B.S.  degree from The State  University  of New York at
Oswego.

Dr.  David  B.  Skinner.   Dr.   Skinner  is  President   Emeritus  of  the  New
York-Presbyterian  Hospital and the New York-Presbyterian  Healthcare System. He
was Vice  Chairman/President and CEO of the Society of the New York Hospital and
its Healthcare  System and subsequently of the merged  institution for 13 years.
He is also a  professor  of  cardiothoracic  surgery  and  surgery  at the Weill
Medical  College  of  Cornell  University,  professor  of  surgery  at  Columbia
University  College of Physicians and Surgeons,  and an attending surgeon at New
York  Presbyterian  Hospital.  He was  professor  of  surgery  at Johns  Hopkins
University  School of Medicine from 1968 to 1972,  and professor and chairman of
surgery at the University of Chicago,  Pritzker  School of Medicine from 1973 to
1987.  Dr.  Skinner  has  been  awarded  numerous  honorary   degrees,   faculty
appointments,  corporate  directorships,  and domestic and international honors,
awards, and prizes. Dr. Skinner holds a BA degree,  with high distinction,  from
the University of Rochester and an MD degree, cum laude, from Yale University.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  requires
directors  and  executive  officers,  and  persons  who own  more  than 10% of a
registered  class  of a  company's  equity  securities,  to file  with the U. S.
Securities and Exchange  Commission  initial reports of ownership and reports of
changes in ownership of the Company's common stock and other equity  securities.
Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by Securities
and Exchange  Commission  regulations  to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely upon such reports, we believe that
none of such persons  failed to comply with the  requirements  of Section  16(a)
during 2001.


ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Officer Compensation

Summary  Compensation  Table.  The  following  table  sets  forth the annual and
long-term  compensation  for services in all  capacities  to the Company for the
three years ended December 31, 2001,  awarded or paid to, or earned by our Chief
Executive  Officer ("CEO") and our four other most highly  compensated  officers
(the "Named Officers").

                                                                    Long-Term
                              Annual Compensation                 Compensation
                              --------------------                ------------
                                                                   Securities
                                                                   Underlying
      Name and      Fiscal                                           Options
Principal Position   Year      Salary        Bonus      Other(1)     (Shares)
- ------------------ -------- -----------  ----------- ------------ ------------

John R. Prufeta       2001    $114,000         0                      425,000
President and CEO     2000    $120,000         0                      600,000
                      1999    $171,000(2)      0                      925,000

Louis E. Hyman,       2001    156,625(3)       0                      250,000
Executive Vice
President and
Chief Technology
Officer

Patricia A.                   $197,000         0                      175,000
Minicucci           2001      $163,846         0                      400,000
Executive Vice
President for       2000
Operations

Gary L. Smith,        2001    $197,000         0                      175,000
Executive Vice        2000        $2,430       0                      250,000
President and
Chief Financial
Officer

Brian R. Ellacott     2001    $165,000         0                      175,000
Senior Vice           2000    $125,769                                150,000
President


(1)  Other  annual  compensation,  except  as  noted,  is made up of  automobile
     allowances,  and disability and health insurance premiums,  in amounts less
     than 10% of the officer's annual salary plus bonus.
(2)  During 1999, Mr. Prufeta served as a consultant to the Company  pursuant to
     a  consulting  agreement  between the Company  and his  employer,  Creative
     Management  Strategies,  Inc., which company was paid or accrued the amount
     shown above and received options to purchase 25,000 shares of Common Stock,
     included in the amount shown. He became an employee of the Company in early
     2000.
(3)  During  2001,  Mr.  Hyman,  through  an  affiliated  entity,  served  as  a
     consultant  to Medix before he became a full time  employee  and  executive
     officer.  This amount includes the consulting  compensation to his firm. He
     also  received  a grant  of  options  to  purchase  20,000  shares  for his
     consulting services.

     Stock Option Awards.  In August 1999,  our Board of Directors  approved and
authorized  our 1999 Stock Option Plan (the "1999  Plan"),  which is intended to
grant  either  non-qualified  stock  options  or  incentive  stock  options,  as
described below. In 2000, our  shareholders  approved the 1999 Plan. The purpose
of the 1999 Plan is to enable our company to provide  opportunities  for certain
officers and key employees to acquire a proprietary  interest in our company, to
increase  incentives  for such  persons to  contribute  to our  performance  and
further  success,  and  to  attract  and  retain  individuals  with  exceptional
business,  managerial and  administrative  talents,  who will  contribute to our
progress, growth and profitability.

     Options  granted under our 1999 Plan include both  incentive  stock options
("ISOs"),  within the meaning of Section  422 of the  Internal  Revenue  Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"),  and non-qualified stock options ("NQOs").  Under
the terms of the Plan,  all officers  and  employees of our company are eligible
for ISOs. Our company  determines in its discretion,  which persons will receive
ISOs, the applicable  exercise price,  vesting  provisions and the exercise term
thereof.  The terms and  conditions  of option  grants  differ from  optionee to
optionee and are set forth in the optionees'  individual stock option agreement.
Such options  generally vest over a period of one or more years and expire after
up to ten years.  In order to qualify for certain  preferential  treatment under
the Code,  ISOs must satisfy the statutory  requirements  thereof.  Options that
fail to satisfy  those  requirements  will be deemed  NQOs and will not  receive
preferential treatment under the Code. Upon exercise, shares will be issued upon
payment of the exercise price in cash, by delivery of shares of Common Stock, by
delivery of options or a combination of any of these methods. At our 2001 Annual
Meeting, our shareholders approved an increase of 3,000,000 shares to 13,000,000
as the amount of total  shares of our Common Stock  reserved for issuance  under
the 1999 Plan.

     As of March 15, 2002,  we had issued  5,736,560  shares of our Common Stock
upon exercise of options to current or former employees and directors,  and have
6,568,667  shares  currently  covered by outstanding  options held by current or
former employees and directors, with exercise prices ranging form $.19 to $4.97.
Such  options  have been  granted  under the 1999 Plan and earlier  stock option
plans.

     Option  information  for fiscal 2001 relating to the Named  Officers is set
forth below:

                             Options Granted in 2001

                     Number of
                     Shares of     Percentage
                       Common         of
                       Stock         Total                          Valuation
                     Underlying     Options                           under
                      Options      Granted to                         Black-
                      Granted      Employees                          Scholes
                        in             in      Exercise  Expiration   Pricing
     Name              2001           2001       Price      Date     Method(1)
- ------------------ ------------- ------------- --------- ----------- ----------

John R. Prufeta        400,00         21.2%       $.62     4/17/06    $217,755
                       25,000          1.3%       $.60     3/23/06    $ 13,171
Louis E. Hyman        230,000         12.2%       $.61     5/14/06    $123,190
                       20,000          1.1%       $.70     3/03/03    $ 15,580
Patricia A.           150,000          7.9%       $.61     5/14/06    $ 80,341
Minicucci              25,000          1.3%       $.60     3/23/06    $ 13,171
Gary L. Smith         150,000          7.9%       $.61     5/14/06    $ 80,341
                       25,000          1.3%       $.60     3/23/06    $ 13,171
Brian R. Ellacott     150,000          7.9%       $.61     5/14/06    $ 80,341
                       25,000          1.3%       $.60     3/23/06    $ 13,171

     (1) The Black-Scholes option-pricing model estimates the options fair value
by  considering  the  following  assumptions:  the  options  exercise  price and
expected  life,  the  underlying  current market price of the stock and expected
volatility,  expected dividends and the risk free interest rate corresponding to
the term of the option. The fair values calculated above use expected volatility
of 132%, a risk-free rate of 5.5%, no dividend yield and anticipated exercise at
the end of the term.


                                          Number of Shares            Value of Unexercised
                                      Underlying Unexercised         In-the-Money Options
                                        Options at Year-End             at Year-End(1)
                 Shares    Value   -----------------------------   --------------------------
Name           Exercised Realized  Exercisable     Unexercisable   Exercisable  Unexercisable
- -------------  --------- --------  ------------    -------------   -----------  -------------

John R. Prufeta     0         0     1,450,000(2)       500,000       $258,250       $80,000

Louis E. Hyman      0         0       112,500          137,500       $  8,325       $12,375

Patricia A.         0         0       575,000                0       $ 16,000       $     0
Minicucci

Gary L. Smith       0         0       325,000          100,000       $ 16,000       $     0

Louis E. Hyman      0         0       112,500          137,500       $  8,325       $12,375

Brian R. Ellacott   0         0       312,500           12,500       $ 16,000       $     0

- --------------

(1)  The dollar values are  calculated by  determining  the  difference  between
     $0.70 per share,  the fair market value of the Common Stock at December 31,
     2001, and the exercise price of the respective options.
(2)  Includes  options covering 25,000 of these shares were granted to a company
     that is an affiliate of Mr. Prufeta for executive search services.

     Medix has no retirement,  pension or profit-sharing program for the benefit
of its  directors,  executive  officers  or other  employees,  but the  Board of
Directors  may  recommend  one or more such programs for adoption in the future.
Medix does not make any contributions to its 401(k) Plan for its employees.

Employment Agreements.

     Mr. Prufeta's Employment  Agreement,  which has an initial term of one year
and renews in automatic one year increments thereafter, provides that he will be
compensated at the base salary of $275,000  annually,  plus a bonus of $400,000,
subject to certain performance criteria. He holds the positions of President and
Chief Executive  Officer and reports to the Board of Directors.  Pursuant to his
Employment  Agreement,  Mr. Prufeta has been granted options to purchase 200,000
shares of Common  Stock at $.70 per  share,  which vest upon the  occurrence  of
certain performance goals. His Employment  Agreement provides for termination at
any time by the employee with or without cause or by the Company with cause. The
Employment  Agreement  is also  subject to  termination  by the Company  without
cause,  after  the  initial  one-year  of the term  subject  to the right of the
employee to continue to receive  salary and pro-rata  bonus  compensation  for 6
months.  The  Employment  Agreement  also contains a non-compete  provision that
extends  for a period  of one  year  after  termination  or  resignation  of the
employee,  as  well  as  certain  confidentiality   provisions.  The  Employment
Agreement  contains  provisions   providing  that,  upon  the  occurrence  of  a
"Triggering  Event"  (defined  to  include a change in  ownership  of 50% of the
outstanding  shares of the Company's Common Stock through a merger or otherwise)
during the term of his  employment,  he will receive a lump sum payment equal to
his then current year's base and bonus pay.

     Mr. Hyman's Employment  Agreement,  which has an initial term of two years,
ending on May 14, 2003,  provides that he will be  compensated  at the salary of
$200,000  annually.  He holds the position of Executive Vice President and Chief
Technology  Officer,  and  reports to the  President  and CEO.  Pursuant  to his
Employment Agreement,  he has been granted options to purchase 230,000 shares of
Common  Stock  at $.61  per  share,  which  vest  over  the  2-year  term of his
Employment Agreement. His Employment

     Agreement  provides for  termination  at any time by the  employee  with or
without  cause or by the Company with cause.  The  Employment  Agreement is also
subject to termination by the Company  without cause after the initial  one-year
of the term,  subject  to the  right of the  employee  to  continue  to  receive
compensation for 6 months. The Employment  Agreement also contains a non-compete
provision that extends for a period of one year after termination or resignation
of the employee, as well as certain confidentiality  provisions.  The Employment
Agreement  contains  provisions   providing  that,  upon  the  occurrence  of  a
"Triggering  Event"  (defined  to  include a change in  ownership  of 50% of the
outstanding  shares of the Company's Common Stock through a merger or otherwise)
during the term of his  employment,  he will receive a lump sum payment equal to
his then current year's base and bonus pay.

     Ms.  Minicucci's  Employment  Agreement,  which had an initial  term of two
years,  ending on March 1, 2002,  provided that she be compensated at the salary
of $200,000 annually.  Such term has been extended to May 1, 2002. She holds the
position of Executive Vice President,  Operations,  and reports to the President
and CEO. Pursuant to her Employment  Agreement,  she has been granted options to
purchase 400,000 shares of Common Stock at $4.97 per share,  which vest over the
2-year term of his Employment  Agreement.  Her Employment Agreement provides for
termination  at any time by the employee with or without cause or by the Company
with cause.  The  Employment  Agreement  is also subject to  termination  by the
Company without cause after the initial  one-year term,  subject to the right of
the employee to continue to receive  compensation  for 6 months.  The Employment
Agreement also contains a non-compete provision that extends for a period of one
year  after  termination  or  resignation  of the  employee,  as well as certain
confidentiality   provisions.   The  Employment  Agreement  contains  provisions
providing that, upon the occurrence of a "Triggering  Event" (defined to include
a change in ownership of 50% of the outstanding  shares of the Company's  Common
Stock through a merger or otherwise