Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-k
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
Commission file number 2-71249
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia 58-1418696
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation or organization) Number)
104 North Dixon Street, Alma, Georgia 31510
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (912) 632-8631
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation 5-K is not contained herein and will not be
contained to the best of registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy on
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (X)
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant: There is no established market for the
outstanding common stock of the registrant.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common stock, as of the most recent practicable date.
Class Outstanding at February 28, 1996
Common stock $1.00 par value per 405,283
share
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference
and the part of the Form 10-K into which the documents are incorporated:
(1) any annual reports to security holders; (2) any prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. None
PART 1.
Item 1. Business
South Banking Company (the "Registrant") is a business corporation
organized at the direction of Alma Exchange Bank & Trust ("Alma Bank")
and Citizens State Bank ("Citizens Bank") (collectively, the "Banks") in
1980 under the Georgia Business Corporation Code. It was formed to
obtain all the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the
Banks. Pursuant to the terms and provisions of a Plan of Reorganization
and Agreement of Merger, dated as of January 13, 1981 and approved by
the shareholders of the Banks on June 24, 1981, the Banks were
reorganized into a holding company structure by merging the Banks with
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant, which transaction was
consummated on July 28, 1981. In connection with those mergers, the
outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Banks were converted into
shares of the Registrant at specified ratios and the Banks became
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant. Pursuant to the terms and
provision of an agreement of merger dated June 12, 1989 between South
Banking and Georgia Peoples Bankshares, Inc. and approved by
shareholders of Georgia Peoples on February 26, 1990, Georgia Peoples
Bankshares and its subsidiary, Peoples State Bank, were merged into
South Banking Company. In connection with the merger, the outstanding
shares of Georgia Peoples Bankshares were converted into shares of the
Registrant at specified ratios. During 1993, South Banking Company
formed Banker's Data Services, Inc. ("Banker's Data) for the purpose of
handling all the computer functions of the banks. Operations began in
April, 1994. South Banking entered into an agreement in October of 1995
to acquire all the stock of Pineland State Bank in Metter, Georgia. On
January 11, 1996, the transaction was completed. Prior to year end and
before final agreement to acquire Pineland Bank was reached, South
Banking had acquired rights to approximately 39% of Pineland Bank.
The Banks
The Banks operate full service banking business in Bacon, Appling
and Camden Counties, Georgia, providing such customary banking services
as checking and savings accounts, various other types of time deposits,
safe deposit facilities and money transfers. The Banks also finance
commercial and agricultural transactions, make secured and unsecured
loans, and provide other financial services to its customers. The Banks
do not conduct trust activities. On December 31, 1994, Alma Bank and
Peoples Bank ranked, on the basis of total deposits, as the smaller of
the two banks in Bacon and Appling Counties and the 279th and 305th
largest Banks among 386 banks in Georgia and Citizens Bank, one of five
banking operations in Camden County, ranked the 366th largest bank among
386 banks in Georgia, Sheshunoff's Banks of Georgia (1995 edition).
The Banks make and service both secured and unsecured loans to
individuals, firms and corporations. Commercial lending operations
include various types of credit for the Banks' customers. The Banks'
installment loan departments make direct loans to individuals and, to a
limited extent, purchase installment obligations from retailers both
with and without recourse. The Banks make a variety of residential,
industrial, commercial and agricultural loans secured by real estate,
including interim construction financing. Citizens Bank and Peoples
Bank act as agents for another bank in offering "Master Card" and "VISA"
credit cards to its customers and does not assume the credit risk on
these transactions. Alma Bank offers "Master Card" credit cards to its
customers.
At December 31, 1995, the Banks had correspondent relationships
with 15 other commercial banks. These correspondent banks provide
certain services to the banks such as processing checks and other items,
buying and selling federal funds, handling money transfers and
exchanges, shipping coins and currency, providing security and
safekeeping of funds or other valuable items and furnishing limited
management information and advice. As compensation for the services,
the Banks maintain certain balances with its correspondents in
noninterest bearing accounts.
The Banks are members through its correspondent bank of the AVAIL
network. AVAIL is an organization that has established a network of
automated teller machines inside the state of Georgia.
Employees
On December 31, 1995, the Registrant and its subsidiaries had 62
full-time and 10 part-time employees. The Registrant is not a party to
any collective bargaining agreement and employee relations are deemed to
be good.
Competition
The Banking business is highly competitive. The Banks compete
primarily with other commercial banks operating in Bacon, Camden and
Appling Counties. In addition, the Banks compete with other financial
institutions, including savings and loan associations, credit unions and
finance companies and, to a lesser extent, insurance companies and
certain governmental agencies. The banking industry is also
experiencing increased competition for deposits from less traditional
sources such as money-market mutual funds.
Monetary Policies
The results of operations of the Banks, and therefore of the
Registrant, are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities,
particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
"Board of Governors"), even though the Banks are not members of the
Federal Reserve.
The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve
include open market operations in U. S. Government securities and
changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowing changes in reserve
requirements against member bank deposits. In view of changing
conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, as well as
the effect of action by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the
Federal Reserve System, no prediction can be made as to possible future
changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the business
and earnings of the Banks.
Supervision and Regulations
The Registrant is a bank holding company within the meaning of the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "Act"), and is
required to register as such with the Board of Governors. The
Registrant is required to file with the Board of Governors an annual
report and such other information as may be required to keep the Board
of Governors informed with respect to the Registrant's compliance with
the provisions of the Act. The Board of Governors may also make
examinations of the Registrant and its subsidiaries from time to time.
The Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior
approval of the Board of Governors before it may acquire substantially
all the assets of any bank or ownership or control of any voting shares
of any bank, if, after such acquisition, it would own or control,
directly or indirectly, more than five percent of the voting shares of
such bank. In no case, however, may the Board of Governors approve the
acquisition by the Registrant of the voting shares of any bank located
outside Georgia, unless such acquisition is specifically authorized by
the laws of the state in which the bank to be acquired is located.
In addition, a bank holding company is generally prohibited from
engaging in or acquiring direct or indirect control of voting shares of
any company engaged in nonbanking activities. One of the principal
exceptions to this prohibition is for activities found by the Board of
Governors, by order or regulation, to be so closely related to banking,
managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some
of the activities that the Board of Governors has determined by
regulation to be closely related to banking are: making or servicing
loans and certain types of leases; performing certain data processing
services; acting as fiduciary, investment or financial advisor; making
investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote
community welfare.
In January, 1989, the Board of Governors issued final regulations
which implement risk-based rules for assessing bank and bank holding
company capital adequacy. The regulations revise the definition of
capital and establish minimum capital standards in relation to assets
and off-balance sheet exposures, as adjusted for credit risk.
Risk based capital regulations were adopted by banking regulations
in 1989. These new capital adequacy standards were phased in and became
fully effective on December 31, 1992. Risk based capital standards
generally measure the amount of a bank's required capital in relation to
the degree of risk perceived in its assets and its off-balance sheet
exposure. The concepts of primary and secondary capital were replaced
by Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital and a new leverage ratio requirement was
added. The amount of risk-based capital required is calculated by
multiplying the recorded amount of each asset category and each off-
balance sheet exposure item by the appropriate risk-weighting
percentage. Risk adjusted total assets is the total of these risk-
weighted categories. Total required capital is the product of the risk-
adjusted total assets multiplied by the specific capital percentage
(i.e. 8% at December 31, 1995).
Capital for purposes of the risk-based capital calculation is
divided into two categories:
(1) Tier 1 capital includes common shareholder equity,
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interest;
goodwill is subtracted.
(2) Tier 2 capital includes the allowance for loan and lease
losses, qualifying perpetual preferred stock, hybrid capital
instruments, term-subordinated debt and intermediate term preferred
stock. The allowance and loan losses may only be included up to an
amount equal to 1.25% of risk adjusted total assets. Term
subordinated debt and intermediate term preferred stock may be
included to a maximum of 50% of Tier 1 capital. Finally Tier 2
capital may not exceed Tier 1 capital.
Total qualifying capital, for purposes of risk-based capital
calculation, is the total of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital, less
reciprocal holdings of bank capital instruments and less investments in
unconsolidated subsidiaries.
In June 1992, the Federal Reserve Board released a proposal to add
a measure of interest rate risk to the determination of supervisory
capital adequacy. Under the proposal, items reported on a banks balance
sheet and off-balance sheet would be reported according to maturity. A
bank's reported position would be multiplied by duration based risk
factions and weighted according to rate sensitivity. The objective of
this computer proposal is to determine the sensitivity of a bank to a 1%
change in interest rates.
In addition to risk-based capital, a leverage ratio test must be
met. The leverage ratio is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to assets (not
risk adjusted). The minimum leverage ratio is 3%.
As of December 31, 1995 the banks were in compliance with these
regulations.
The written policies of the Georgia Department of Banking and
Finance (the "DBF") require that state banks in Georgia generally
maintain a minimum ratio of primary capital to total assets of 6.0%. At
December 31, 1995, the Banks were in compliance with these requirements.
In addition, the DBF is likely to compute capital obligations in
accordance with the risk-based capital rules while continuing to require
a minimum absolute level of capital.
It is not anticipated that such minimum capital requirements will
affect the business operations of the Banks. However, the Board, in
connection with granting approval for bank holding companies to acquire
other banks and bank holding companies or to engage in non-banking
activities, requires bank holding companies to maintain tangible capital
ratios at approximate peer group levels. This requirement can result in
a bank holding company maintaining more capital than it would otherwise
maintain. At the present time, South Banking Company's tangible primary
capital ratios are equal or above their peer group level.
The laws of Georgia require annual registration with the DBF by all
Georgia bank holding companies. Such registration includes information
with respect to the financial condition, operations and management of
intercompany relationships of the bank holding company and its
subsidiaries and related matters. The DBF may also require such other
information as is necessary to keep informed as to whether the
provisions of Georgia law and the regulations and orders issued
thereunder by the DBF have been in compliance with; and the DBF may make
examinations of the bank holding company and each bank subsidiary
thereof.
The banks are also subject to examination by the DBF and the FDIC.
The DBF regulates and monitors all areas of the operations of the banks,
including reserves, loans, mortgages, issuances of securities, payment
of dividends, interest rates and establishment of branches. Interest
and certain other charges collected or contracted for by the Banks are
also subject to state usury laws and certain federal laws concerning
interest rates. The Banks' deposits are insured by the FDIC up to the
maximum permitted by law.
Under present Georgia law, Alma Bank may operate and establish
branches only in Bacon County, Georgia, Citizen Bank may operate and
establish branches only in Camden County, Georgia and Peoples Bank may
operate and establish branches only in Appling County, Georgia. Current
legislation has passed that would allow banks to branch statewide
subject to certain restriction. This law will become effective July 1,
1996.
Georgia banking laws permit bank holding companies to own more than
one bank, subject to the prior approval of the Georgia Department of
Banking and Finance; thereby, in effect, permitting statewide banking
organizations. Such banks may be acquired as subsidiaries of the
Registrant or merged into its existing bank subsidiaries.
Recent Legislation
Bills are presently pending before the United States Congress and
certain state legislatures and additional bills may be introduced in the
future in the Congress and the state legislatures to alter the
structure, regulation and competitive relationships of the nation's
financial institutions. It cannot be predicted whether or in what form
any of these proposals will be adopted or the extent to which the
business of the Banks may be affected thereby.
More recently, the attention of the United States Congress has been
focused primarily on the need for resolution of the insolvency of the
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation ("FSLIC"), which insured
deposits maintained in most savings and loan associations and savings
banks and the need to provide appropriate structural reform to the
thrift industry. On August 9, 1989, President Bush signed the
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989
("FIRREA"), which is designed to resolve these problems and which, among
other matters, fundamentally restructures the supervision and regulation
of the thrift industry and creates a special corporation to liquidate
insolvent institutions and issue $30 billion in bonds to assist in
financing the cost of resolving failed thrift institutions. Under the
legislation, the FSLIC was merged administratively with the FDIC, and
the FDIC now regulates the two deposit insurance funds for commercial
banks and thrifts. Although the two insurance funds will not be co-
mingled, the fees that commercial banks and thrifts would pay to their
respective insurance funds will be increased. Within certain limits,
assessments may be raised as high as .325% to prevent the insurance
funds from declining. The FDIC will have the authority to revise the
premium for institutions in either fund in certain circumstances. In
addition to the insurance premium increase provisions, FIRREA also
provides for these additional changes with a direct effect on commercial
banks and bank holding companies: limits on the use of brokered deposits
by capital deficient banks; the acquisition of savings and loan
associations by bank holding companies; disclosures of the bank
supervisors' assessment of community Reinvestment Act ratings for banks;
and an increase in penalties for various bank related crimes both in the
forms of fines and sentences. It is difficult to predict the effect of
FIRREA on the operations and prospects of banks; however, the increase
in deposit insurance premiums paid by the Banks will increase the Banks
cost of funds and there can be no assurance that such cost can be passed
on to the Banks' customers.
In the 1989 session, the Georgia legislature enacted a bill to
authorize the DBF to promulgate regulations providing for increased
securities and real estate powers for banks. The legislation does not
detail these new powers, leaving the specifics to the DBF's discretion.
It is not expected that the DBF will immediately grant significant new
powers or that such powers will have a great impact on the Banks.
Effective on July 1, 1985, the Georgia General Assembly adopted
legislation that allows bank holding companies located in Georgia to own
or control banks in certain other southeastern states and allows bank
holding companies in other southeastern states to own or control banks
located in Georgia on a reciprocal basis. Effective March 13, 1987, the
Georgia State Legislature expanded this reciprocal regional interstate
banking area to include the State of Maryland and the District of
Columbia. The legislatures of Alabama, the District of Columbia,
Florida, Louisiana, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Tennessee and Virginia have passed regional interstate banking laws
which are in effect. The state of Mississippi has approved regional
interstate banking effective January 1, 1990 with respect to holding
company entry on a reciprocal basis by holding companies located in
Georgia. During 1994, the state of Georgia approved a measure to allow
nation wide interstate banking. Management of the Banks do not
anticipate this new law will have any impact on their operations.
Georgia passed state wide branching law in February, 1996 with an
efective date of July 1, 1996. This will allow banks to cross county
lines and establish branches. It is anticipated that increased
competition will occur as a result.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
On December 19, 1991, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act of 1991 (the "FDICIA") became law. While the FDICIA
primarily addressed additional sources of funding for the Bank Insurance
Fund, which insures the deposits of commercial banks and savings banks,
it also imposed a number of new mandatory supervisory measures on
savings associations and banks.
Standards for Safety and Soundness FDICIA requires the federal
bank regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation, standards for all
insured depository institutions and depository institution holding
companies relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems and
audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv)
interest rate risk exposure; (v) asset growth; and (vi) compensation,
fees and benefits. The compensation standards would prohibit employment
contracts, compensation or benefit arrangements, stock option plans, fee
arrangements or other compensatory arrangements that would provide
excessive compensation, fees or benefits or could lead to material
financial loss. In addition, the federal banking regulatory agencies
would be required to prescribe by regulation standards specifying: (i)
maximum classified assets-to-capital ratios; (ii) minimum earnings
sufficient to absorb losses without impairing capital; and (iii) to the
extent feasible, a minimum ratio of market value to book value for
publicly traded shares of depository institutions and depository
institution holding companies. Final regulations implementing these
standards must be promulgated by July 1, 1993 and effective by January
1, 1994. The federal banking agencies recently adopted an advance
notice of proposed rulemaking regarding implementation of these
standards. A recently enacted law amends certain FDICIA provisions
regarding compensation standards and several pending legislative bills
would amend certain other requirements of this section of FDICIA. Thus,
it is uncertain whether such provisions will ever be implemented or, if
implemented by the banking agencies, it is uncertain as to how the
standards will be applied.
Financial Management Requirements FDICIA also imposes new
financial reporting requirements on all depository institutions with
assets of more than $150 million, their management and their independent
auditors and establishes new rules for the composition, duties and
authority of such institutions' audit committees and boards of
directors, effective in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 1992.
Among other things, all such depository institutions will be required to
prepare and make available to the public annual reports on their
financial condition and management, including statements of managements'
responsibility for the financial statements, internal controls and
compliance with certain federal banking laws and regulations relating to
safety and soundness and an assessment of the institutions' compliance
with such internal controls, laws and regulations. The institution's
independent public accountants are required to attest to these
management assessments. Each institution also is required to have an
audit committee composed of independent directors. Audit committees of
large institutions (to be defined by the FDIC) would have the ability to
engage their own, independent legal counsel.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action FDICIA establishes a
system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of
undercapitalized institutions. Under this system, which became
effective December 19, 1992, the banking regulators are required to take
certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, the
severity of which depends upon the institution's degree of
capitalization. Generally, subject to a narrow exception, the FDICIA
requires the banking regulator to appoint a receiver or conservator for
an institution that is critically undercapitalized. The FDICIA
authorizes the banking regulators to specify the ratio of tangible
capital to assets at which an institution becomes critically
undercapitalized and requires that ratio be no less than 2% of assets.
Other Deposit Insurance Reforms FDICIA amended the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act ("FDI Act") to prohibit insured depository
institutions that are not well-capitalized from accepting brokered
deposits unless a waiver has been obtained from the FDIC. Deposit
brokers will be required to register with the FDIC.
FDICIA also directs the FDIC to establish a risk-based assessment
system for deposit insurance to become effective no later than January
1, 1994. FDICIA provides that, under the risk-based system established
by the FDIC, deposit insurance assessments paid by a financial
institution are to be based on the probability that the deposit
insurance funds (i.e. BIF or SAIF) will incur a loss with respect to the
insured depository institution. The FDIC recently established a
transitional risk-based insurance assessment system which was effective
for the semi-annual assessment period beginning January 1, 1993 and has
proposed a risk-based system to replace the transitional system.
Furthermore, FDICIA authorizes the FDIC to privately reinsure up to 10%
of its risk of loss with respect to an institution and base its
assessment on the cost of such reinsurance.
The Tax Reform Act of 1986
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "TRA") contains several provisions
affecting banks and financial institutions, including new provisions
governing tax rates, depreciation, investment tax credits, bad debt
reserves, interest expense allocable to tax-exempt obligations, net
operating losses and a new alternative minimum tax ("AMT"). The TRA
reduced the maximum corporate income tax rate from 46% to 34% in 1988
when the provision was fully effective. A surcharge of 5% will also
apply to income in excess of $100,000, up to a maximum surcharge of
$11,750.
For tax years beginning after 1986, the TRA imposes an AMT on
corporations. The tax is computed by applying a 20% tax rate to the sum
of (1) taxable income, (2) certain preference items and (3) 50% of the
excess of book income before taxes over the sum of (1) and (2). For a
financial institution, the principal preference items result from bad
debt deductions, accelerated depreciation and interest on certain
private purpose tax exempt bonds. The taxpayer is then required to pay
the greater of its regular tax or the AMT. South does not expect to
incur an alternative minimum tax liability based on its current
profitability and investment portfolio. If the AMT is incurred as a
result of deferral preferences, a credit is generated which may be used
against regular tax in subsequent years.
The TRA provides for disallowances of 100% of any otherwise
allowable interest expense deduction that is deemed allocable to tax-
exempt obligations acquired after August 7, 1986, except for certain
small municipal issuers. As a result, the Banks expect to primarily
invest in taxable investment securities.
Financial institutions with assets in excess of $500 million are no
longer permitted to use the reserve method for accounting for loan
losses for tax purposes. South does not exceed this asset size and,
accordingly, can continue to use the reserve method.
The TRA also eliminated investment tax credits after December 31,
1985. As investment in premises and equipment is not significant to the
assets of South, the elimination of investment tax credits is not
perceived to materially affect the tax provision expense of South.
The foregoing is only a summary of certain Federal income tax
changes caused by the TRA and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the TRA. It does not include all aspects of the TRA as it relates to
financial institutions or state, local or other tax laws.
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (the "Tax Act")
continues the recent legislation affecting banks and financial
institution. The Tax Act was designed as a deficit reduction with
similarities to the 1990 Act which was also designed to slice $500
billion from the deficit.
Generally the Tax Act affects all corporations as to a new 35% tax
rate for income in excess of 10 million and the maximum corporate
capital gains rate was increased to 35%. The Registrant currently will
not be affected by the change due to the income level of the Registrant.
Various other provisions would restrict certain deductions and/or change
the treatment of certain transactions.
Provisions that especially affect financial institutions included
market to market Accounting for Securities. The Tax Act requires that
securities that are inventory in the hands of a dealer be inventoried at
fair market value (market to market). For the purposes of these rules,
"securities" and a "dealer" are defined more broadly than under prior
law. A "dealer" is any person who either regularly purchases securities
from or sells securities to, customers in the ordinary course of
business or regularly offers to enter into, assume, offset, assign or
otherwise terminate positions in securities with customers in the
ordinary course of a trade or business. Banks have been determined to
qualify as a dealer under the new definitions. Unless securities are
properly identified as held for investment all inventory will be
required to be market to market.
A second item affecting financial institutions is the treatment of
tax-free FSLIC Assistance that was credited on or after March 4, 1991 in
connection with the disposition of "covered" assets. Financial
institutions are required to treat that assistance as compensation for
any losses claimed on dispositions or charge-offs of these assets,
effectively denying them any tax loss for those assets. This provision
should not have any effect on the Registrant.
The third item affecting financial institutions is the amortization
of intangible assets effective for purchase after the enactment (August
10, 1993). Taxpayers are required to amortize most intangibles
(including goodwill, core deposits, going concern value and covenant not
to compete) used in a trade or business over a 15 year period.
Exception to this rule includes mortgage service rights. The provision
will have significant impact on any future purchases the holding company
may decide to undertake.
Some of the other provisions such as eliminating deductions for
lobbying expense and club dues will impact the taxes payable by the
Registrant.
Reigle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
The Reigle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (CDRIA) was enacted in September, 1994. CDRIA is divided into five
titles:
Title I. Community Development and Consumer Protection
Title II. Small Business Capital Formation
Title III. Paperwork Reduction and Regulatory Improvements
Title IV. Money Laundering
Title V. National Flood Insurance Refund
Some of the more prominent provisions of this legislation included,
consideration of regulatory burden in the rule making process,
streamlining of regulatory requirements, call report simplification and
repeal of publication requirements, regulatory appeals reform, truth in
savings act exemption for business accounts, guidelines for examiners,
expedited procedures for forming a bank holding company and holding
commpany audit requirements. Management has determined that this act
will have minimal effect on South Banking Company.
Reigle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
The Reigle-Neal Interstate Bank and Branching Efficiency Act of
1994 expands the rights of bank and bank holding companies to own out-
of-state banks and branches. After September 29, 1995, bank holding
companies will be allowed to acquire banks in any state without regard
to state law. States will be allowed to prevent holding companies from
acquiring newly opened banks. (e.g., those in existance for less than 5
years).
Banks will also be able to merge with out-of-state banks and
establish out-of-state branches effective June 1, 1997. States,
however, have the authority to prohibit out-of-state banks from opening
branches.
Recent and Proposed Changes in Accounting Rules
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") recently adopted
or issued proposals and guidelines which may have a significant impact
on the accounting practices of commercial enterprises in general and
financial institutions in particular.
Effective for years beginning after December 15, 1993 the
Registrant was required to implement FASB 115 "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities". This FASB requires
securities to be classified in one of three categories:
(1) Held to maturity
(2) Trading securities
(3) Securities available for sale
The Banks were required to classify all securities into one of the
three categories. The Banks currently do not have trading accounts and
do not anticipate classifying any securities into this category. Once
the securities are classified FASB 115 restricts the transfer between
classification except under rare circumstances. The affect on the banks
will primarily be in securities classified available for sale. FASB 115
requires these securities to be market to market with unrealized gains
and losses reported as a separate amount in stockholders equity section
and excluded from earnings until realized. Deferred taxes will be
provided in accordance with FASB 109 on the unrealized gains and losses.
FASB 114 became effective for years beginning after December 15,
1994. FASB 114 "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan"
specifies how allowance for credit losses related to certain loans
should be determined. When the FASB became effective, the Banks were
required to modify the treatment of impaired loans to discount expected
cash flows and record a valuation allowance. The Banks did not have any
material change as a result of this FASB.
In February 1992, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards SFAS No. 109 relating to the method of accounting for deferred
income taxes. Implementation of SFAS 109 is required for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1992. SFAS No. 109 requires companies to
take into account changes in tax rates when valuing the deferred income
tax amounts recorded on the balance sheet. The statement also requires
that deferred taxes be provided for all temporary differences between
financial statement and tax income in addition to the timing differences
in the recognition of income for financial statement and tax purposes
which were covered by prior accounting rules.
In December 1990, FASB issued SFAS No. 106, "Employer's Accounting
for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions". SFAS No. 106 focuses
principally on post-retirement health care benefits and will
significantly change the prevalent current practice of accounting for
post-retirement benefits on a cash basis to requiring accrual, during
the years that the employee renders the necessary service, of the
expected cost of providing those benefits to an employee and the
employee's beneficiaries and covered dependents. SFAS No. 106 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1992, and
adoption is required on a prospective basis. Management believes that
the provisions of SFAS No. 106 will not have a significant effect on
future results of operations.
In December 1991, the FASB issued SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures About
Fair Value of Financial Investments". SFAS No. 107 requires all
entities to disclose, in financial statements or the notes thereto, the
fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities,
recognized and not recognized, in the statement of financial condition,
for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. SFAS No. 107 is
effective for financial statements issued for years ending after
December 15, 1992, except for entities with less than $150 million in
total assets, for which it is effective in 1996. Substantially all of
the Bank's assets and liabilities are financial instruments and, as a
result, SFAS No. 107 requires the fair value of such assets and
liabilities to be disclosed. Because such assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature, their fair values may fluctuate significantly over
time. The provisions of SFAS No. 107 will require certain disclosures
on the part of management, but will not have a significant effect on
future results of operations.
In April 1992, the Accounting Standards Division of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position
92-3 ("SOP 92-3") "Accounting for Foreclosed Assets". SOP 92-3 requires
all entities to value foreclosed assets held for sale at the lower of
(i) fair value minus estimated costs to sell or (ii) cost. The bank is
in compliance with this statement of position.
Selected Statistical Information
The tables and schedules on the following pages set forth certain
significant statistical data with respect to: (I) the distribution of
assets, liabilities and shareholders' equity and the interest rates and
interest differentials experienced by, the Registrant and its
subsidiaries; (II) the investment portfolio of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries; (III) the loan portfolio of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries, including types of loans, maturities and sensitivity to
changes in interest rates and information on nonperforming loans; (IV)
summary of the loan loss experience and reserves for loan losses of the
Registrant and its subsidiaries; (V) types of deposits of the Registrant
and its subsidiaries; and (VI) the return on assets and equity for the
Registrant and its subsidiaries.
I. DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY;
INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIALS
A. The condensed average balance sheets for the periods indicated are
presented below.
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 4,348 $ 3,749 $ 4,788
Cash in bank - interest bearing 827 1,538 2,377
Taxable investment securities 8,518 8,222 10,610
Nontaxable investment
securities 1,055 1,619 2,011
Others 273 - -
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
ASSETS (con't)
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to
resell $ 8,023 $ 7,883 $ 5,655
Loans - net 60,641 54,042 48,898
Other assets 5,968 5,700 5,560
Total Assets $ 89,653 $ 82,753 $ 79,899
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits: Demand - non-interest
bearing $ 13,446 $ 12,965 $ 11,701
Demand - interest
bearing 15,211 17,378 17,923
Savings 6,675 7,132 6,423
Time 42,838 34,647 34,005
Total Deposits $ 78,170 $ 72,122 $ 70,052
Federal funds purchased 7 167 -
Other borrowed funds 1,545 1,186 762
Other liabilities 408 468 1,128
Total Liabilities $ 80,130 $ 73,943 $ 71,942
Shareholders' equity $ 9,523 $ 8,810 $ 7,957
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity $ 89,653 $ 82,753 $ 79,899
B. Interest Rates. The tables below show for the periods indicated the
average amount outstanding for major categories of interest earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities; the average interest rates
earned or paid; the interest income and expense earned or paid thereon;
net interest earnings and the net yield on interest-earning assets. (1)
Year Ended December 31, 1995
Average Yield/
Balance Interest Rate
(In Thousands)
ASSETS
Cash in banks - interest
bearing $ 827 $ 41 4.96%
Loans 60,641 6,996 11.54
Taxable investments 8,518 513 6.02
Non-taxable investments 1,055 59 5.59
Other 273 10 3.66
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased
under agreements to resell 8,023 472 5.88
Total Interest-bearing
assets $ 79,337 $ 8,091 10.20%
Year Ended December 31, 1995
Average Yield/
Balance Interest Rate
(In Thousands)
LIABILITIES
Demand - interest bearing $ 15,211 $ 407 2.68%
Savings deposits 6,675 182 2.73
Other time deposits 42,838 2,580 6.02
Other short term borrowing 1,545 144 9.32
Federal funds purchased 7 1 N/A
Total Interest-Bearing
Liabilities $ 66,276 $ 3,314 5.00%
Net interest earnings $ 4,777
Net yield on interest earning assets 5.20%
Year Ended December 31, 1994
Average Yield/
Balance Interest Rate
(In Thousands)
ASSETS
Cash in banks - interest
bearing $ 1,538 $ 65 4.22%
Loans 54,042 5,666 10.48
Taxable investments 8,222 437 5.32
Non-taxable investments 1,619 94 5.81
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased
under agreements to resell 7,883 306 3.88
Total Interest-bearing
assets $ 73,304 $ 6,568 8.96%
LIABILITIES
Demand - interest bearing $ 17,378 $ 492 2.83%
Savings deposits 7,132 197 2.76
Other time deposits 34,647 1,475 4.26
Other short term borrowing 1,186 101 8.52
Federal funds purchased 167 4 2.40
Total Interest-Bearing
Liabilities $ 60,510 $ 2,269 3.75%
Net interest earnings $ 4,299
Net yield on interest earning assets 5.21%
Year Ended December 31, 1993
Average Yield/
Balance Interest Rate
(In Thousands)
ASSETS
Cash in banks - interest
bearing $ 2,377 $ 96 4.04%
Loans 48,898 4,973 10.17
Taxable investments 10,610 616 5.81
Non-taxable investments 2,011 133 6.61
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased
under agreements to resell 5,655 164 2.90
Total Interest-bearing assets $ 69,551 $ 5,982 8.60%
LIABILITIES
Demand - interest bearing $ 17,923 $ 485 2.70%
Savings deposits 6,423 178 2.77
Other time deposits 34,005 1,423 4.18
Other short term borrowing 762 49 6.43
Federal funds purchased - - -
Total Interest-Bearing
Liabilities $ 59,113 $ 2,135 3.61%
Net interest earnings $ 3,847
Net yield on interest earning assets 4.99%
(1) Note: Loan fees are included for rate calculation purposes. Loan fees
included in interest amounted to approximately $464,456 in 1995, $521,000
in 1994 and $345,000 in 1993. Non accrual loans have been included in the
average balances.
C. Interest Differentials. The following tables set forth for the
periods indicated a summary of the changes in interest earned and interest
paid resulting from changes in volume and changes in rates.
1995 compared to 1994
Increase (Decrease) Due to (1)
Volume Rate Change
(In Thousands)
Interest earned on:
Cash in banks - interest
bearing $( 30) $ 6 $( 24)
Loans 690 640 1,330
Taxable investments 16 60 76
Nontaxable investments ( 33) ( 2) ( 35)
Other 10 - 10
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased under
agreement to resell 6 160 166
Total Interest-Earning Assets $ 659 $ 864 $ 1,523
1995 compared to 1994 (con't)
Increase (Decrease) Due to (1)
Volume Rate Change
(In Thousands)
Interest paid on:
NOW deposits $( 61) $( 24) $( 85)
Savings deposits ( 13) ( 2) ( 15)
Other time deposits 349 756 1,105
Other borrowing 30 13 43
Federal funds purchased ( 3) - ( 3)
Total Interest-bearing
Liabilities $ 302 $ 743 $ 1,045
Net Interest Earnings $ 357 $ 121 $ 478
(1) The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying
the rate from the earlier year to the change in average balances
outstanding from one year to the next. The change in interest due to rate
has been determined by applying the change in rate from one year to the
next to average balances outstanding in the later year.
1994 compared to 1993
Increase (Decrease) Due to (1)
Volume Rate Change
(In Thousands)
Interest earned on:
Cash in banks - interest
bearing $( 33) $ 2 $( 31)
Loans 523 170 693
Taxable investments ( 138) ( 40) ( 178)
Nontaxable investments ( 23) ( 16) ( 39)
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased under
agreement to resell 65 76 141
Total Interest-Earning Assets $ 394 $ 192 $ 586
Interest paid on:
NOW deposits $( 15) $ 22 $ 7
Savings deposits 19 - 19
Other time deposits 26 26 52
Other borrowing 27 25 52
Federal funds purchased 4 - 4
Total Interest-bearing
Liabilities $ 61 $ 73 $ 134
Net Interest Earnings $ 333 $ 119 $ 452
(1) The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying
the rate from the earlier year to the change in average balances
outstanding from one year to the next. The change in interest due to rate
has been determined by applying the change in rate from one year to the
next to average balances outstanding in the later year.
1993 compared to 1992
Increase (Decrease) Due to (1)
Volume Rate Change
(In Thousands)
Interest earned on:
Cash in banks - interest
bearing $ 12 $( 22) $( 10)
Loans 46 ( 415) ( 369)
Taxable investments 56 ( 99) ( 43)
Nontaxable investments ( 11) ( 8) ( 19)
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased under
agreement to resell ( 17) ( 28) ( 45)
Total Interest-Earning Assets $ 86 $( 572) $( 486)
Interest paid on:
NOW deposits $ 145 $( 135) $ 10
Savings deposits 32 ( 26) 6
Other time deposits ( 344) ( 437) ( 781)
Other short-term borrowing ( 6) ( 9) ( 15)
Federal funds purchased - - -
Total Interest-bearing
Liabilities $( 173) $( 607) $( 780)
Net Interest Earnings $ 259 $ 35 $ 294
II. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
A. Types of Investments The carrying amounts of investment securities
at the dates indicated are summarized as follows:
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
U. S. Treasury and other
U. S. government agencies
and corporations $ 7,634 $ 5,942 $ 6,750
State and political
subdivisions (domestic) 1,921 1,126 1,871
Mortgage backed securities 1,897 2,065 1,897
Totals $ 11,452 $ 9,133 $ 10,518
B. Maturities The amounts of investment securities in each category as
of December 31, 1995 are shown in the following table according to
maturity classifications (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through
five years, (3) after five years through ten years, (4) after ten years.
U. S. Treasury
and Other U. S.
Government State
Agencies and and Political Mortgage Backed
Corporations Subdivisions Securities
Average Average
Yield Yield Average
Amount (1) Amount (1)(2) Amount Yields
Maturity:
One year or less $ 2,248 5.63% $ - -% $ - -
After one year
through five years 4,680 5.92 626 7.00 1,158 6.86
After five years
through ten years 706 7.66 758 7.03 - -
After ten years - - 537 8.65 739 7.38
Totals $ 7,634 6.00% $ 1,921 7.47% $ 1,897 7.06%
(1) Yields were computed using coupon interest, adding discount
accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a
ratable basis over the life of each security. The weighted average
yield for each maturity range was computed using the acquisition price
of each security in that range.
(2) Yields on securities of state and political subdivisions are stated
on a tax equivalent basis, using a tax rate of 34%.
III. Loan Portfolio
A. Types of Loans The amount of loans outstanding at the indicated
dates are shown in the following table according to type of loan.
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and
agricultural $ 14,592 $ 13,229 $ 7,904
Real estate - mortgage 36,426 32,792 26,883
Real estate - construction 1,767 2,347 1,039
Installments 8,932 8,834 14,967
$ 61,717 $ 57,202 $ 50,793
Less - unearned income 82 59 73
Reserve for possible
losses 994 975 912
Total Loans $ 60,641 $ 56,168 $ 49,808
B. Maturities and Sensitivity to Changes in Interest Rates The amount
of total loans by category (excluding real estate mortgage and
installment loans) outstanding as of December 31, 1995 which, based on
remaining repayments of principal, are due in (1) year or less, (2) more
than one year but less than five and (3) more than five years are shown
in the following table. The amounts due after one year are classified
according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
Maturity Classification
Over One
One Year Through 5 Over
or Less Years 5 years Total
(In Thousands)
Types of Loans
Commercial,
financial and
agricultural $ N/A $ N/A $ N/A $ N/A
Real estate
construction $ 1,767 N/A N/A N/A
Total loans due
after one year with:
Predetermined interest rate N/A
Floating interest rate N/A
C. Nonperforming Loans The following table presents, at the dates
indicated, the aggregate amounts of nonperforming loans for the
categories indicated.
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
Loans accounted for on a
non-accrual basis $ 46 $ 56 $ 100
Loans contractually past due
ninety days or more as to
interest or principal payments 276 33 58
Loans, the terms of which have
been renegotiated to provide
a reduction or deferral of
interest or principal because
of a deterioration in the
financial position of the
borrower - - -
Loans now current about which
there are serious doubts as
to the ability of the borrower
to comply with present loan
repayment terms - - -
Loans are placed on non-accrual basis when loans are past due
ninety days or more. Management can elect not to place loans on non-
accrual status if net realizable value of collateral is sufficient to
cover the balance and accrued interest.
D. Commitments and Lines of Credit The banks provide commitments and
lines of credits to their most credit worthy customers only.
Commitments are for short terms, usually not exceeding 30 days, and are
provided for a fee of 1% of the amount committed. Lines of credit are
for periods extending up to one year. No fee is usually charged with
respect to the unused portion of a line of credit. Interest rates on
loans made pursuant to commitments or under lines of credit are deter-
mined at the time that the commitment is made or line is established.
E. Rate Sensitivity Analysis
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
DECEMBER 31, 1995
+-----Interest Sensitive
0 - 0 - 0 -
90 Days 180 Days 365 Days
(Thousands of
Earning Assets:
Loans $ 25,984 $ 30,168 $ 37,948
Investment securities 2,017 2,498 4,680
Interest bearing deposits 398 398 795
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased under
agreement to resell 13,335 13,335 13,335
Total Earning Assets $ 41,734 $ 46,399 $ 56,758
Supporting Sources of Fund
Savings $ 6,403 $ 6,403 $ 6,403
Money market and NOW 17,098 17,098 17,098
Other time deposits 11,297 19,704 31,276
CD's - $100,000 or more 2,243 4,183 7,322
Total Interest Bearing
Deposits $ 37,041 $ 47,388 $ 62,099
Demand deposits and other funds
supporting earning assets -
non interest earning $ - $ - $ -
Total Supporting Sources
of funds $ 37,041 $ 47,388 $ 62,099
Interest Sensitive - interest
earning assets less interest
bearing liabilities $ 4,693 $( 989) $( 5,341
Ratio of interest earning
assets to interest bearing
liabilities 1.13% .98% .91
--------+ 0 - 5 yrs
0 - 24
2 years Months Total
Dollars)
$ 44,953 $ 55,336 $ 61,717
6,082 9,347 11,452
795 795 795
13,335 13,335 13,335
$ 65,165 $ 78,813 $ 87,299
$ 6,403 $ 6,403 $ 6,403
17,098 17,098 17,098
35,824 37,526 37,526
8,656 9,372 9,372
$ 67,981 $ 70,399 $ 70,399
$ - $ - $ 14,145
$ 67,981 $ 70,399 $ 84,544
$( 2,816) $ 8,414 $ 2,755
.96% 1.12% 1.03%
The rate sensitivity analysis table is designed to demonstrate
South's sensitivity to changes in interest rates by setting forth in
comparative form the repricing maturities of South's assets and
liabilities for the period shown. A ratio of greater than 1.0 times
interest earnings assets to interest bearing liabilities indicates that
an increase in interest rates will generally result in an increase in
net income for South and a decrease in interest rates will result in a
decrease in net income. A ratio of less than 1.0 times earnings assets
to interest-bearing liabilities indicates that a decrease in interest
rates will generally result in a increase in net income for South and an
increase in interest rates will result in an decrease in net income.
IV. Summary of Loan Loss Experience
The following table summarizes loan balances at the end of each
period and average balances during the year for each category; changes
in the reverse for possible loan losses arising from loans charged off
and recoveries on loans previously charged off; additions to the reserve
which have been charged to operating expense; and the ratio of net
charge-offs during the period to average loans.
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
A. Average amount of loans
outstanding $ 60,641 $ 54,042 $ 48,898
B. Balance of reserve for
possible loan losses at
beginning of period $ 975 $ 912 $ 738
C. Loans charged off:
Commercial, financial
and agricultural $ 45 $ 53 $ 26
Real estate - mortgage - 16 9
Installments 144 24 48
$ 189 $ 93 $ 83
D. Recoveries of loans
previously charged off:
Commercial, financial
and agricultural $ 7 $ 39 $ 36
Real estate 46 6 63
Installment 93 57 40
$ 146 $ 102 $ 139
E. Net loans charged off
during period $ 43 $( 9) $( 56)
Additions to reserve
charged to operating
expense during period (1) $ 62 $ 54 $ 118
F. Balance of reserve for
possible loan losses at
end of period $ 994 $ 975 $ 912
G. Ratio of net loans
charged off during the
period to average loans
outstanding .070 ( .002) ( .01)
(1) Although the provisions exceeded the minimum provision required by
regulatory authorities, the Board of Directors believe that the
provision has not been in excess of the amount required to maintain the
reserve at a sufficient level to cover potential losses. The amount
charged to operations and the related balance in the reserve for loan
losses is based upon periodic evaluations by management of the loan
portfolio. These evaluations consider several factors including, but
not limited to, general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition,
prior loan loss experience and management's estimation of future
potential losses.
(2) Management's review of the loan portfolio did not allocate reserves
by category due to the portfolio's small size. The reserves were
allocated on the bases of a review of the entire portfolio. The
anticipated loan losses for the coming year are expected to be less than
prior years. The portfolio does not contain excessive concentrations in
any industry or loan category that might expose South to significant
risk.
V. Deposits
A. Average deposits, classified as demand deposits, savings deposits
and time certificates of deposit for the periods indicated are presented
below:
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
Demand deposits $ 13,446 $ 12,965 $ 11,701
NOW deposits 15,211 17,378 17,923
Savings deposits 6,675 7,132 6,423
Time certificates of deposits 42,838 34,647 34,005
Total Deposits $ 78,170 $ 72,122 $ 70,052
B. The amounts of time certificates of deposit issued in amounts of
$100,000 or more as of December 31, 1995 are shown below by category,
which is based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or
less, (2) over three through six months, (3) over six through twelve
months and (4) over twelve months.
Three months of less $ 2,243
Over three through six months 1,940
Over six through twelve months 3,139
Over twelve months 2,050
Total $ 9,372
VI. Return on Assets and Shareholders' Equity
The following rate of return information for the periods indicated
is presented below:
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
Return on assets (1) 1.28% 1.19% 1.16%
Return on equity (2) 12.08 11.22 11.66
Dividend payout ratio (3) 19.37 22.54 24.23
Equity to assets ratio (4) 10.62 10.65 9.96
VI. Return on Assets and Shareholders' Equity (con't)
(1) Net income divided by average total assets.
(2) Net income divided by average equity.
(3) Dividends declared per share divided by net income per share.
(4) Average equity divided by average total assets.
Item 2. Properties
Alma Bank's main banking office and the Registrant's principal
executive offices are located at 104 North Dixon Street, Alma, Georgia
31510. The building, containing approximately 13,040 square feet of
usable office and banking space, and the land, approximately 1.2 acres,
are owned by Alma Bank. Alma Bank also has a separate drive-in banking
facility located at 505 South Pierce Street, Alma, Georgia. The
building, containing 510 square feet, in which the branch is located and
the land, approximately .4 acres, on which it is located are owned by
Alma Bank.
Citizens Bank's main banking office is located at 205 East King
Street, Kingsland, Georgia 31548. The building, containing
approximately 6,600 square feet of usable office and banking space, and
the land, approximately 2 acres, are owned by Citizens Bank.
Peoples Bank's main banking office is located at Comas and E.
Parker Streets, Baxley, Georgia 31513. The building, containing
approximately 7,800 square feet of usable office and banking space, and
the land, approximately 2.5 acres, are owned by the Bank. The Bank does
not have branches.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Neither the Registrant or its subsidiaries are parties to, nor is
any of their property the subject of, any material pending legal
proceedings, other than ordinary routine proceedings incidental to the
business of the Banks, nor to the knowledge of the management of the
Registrant are any such proceedings contemplated or threatened against
it or its subsidiaries.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a vote of Security Holders
Note applicable.
Part II.
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Security
Holder Matters
(a) There currently is no public market for the common stock of the
Registrant.
(b) As of March 1, 1996 there were approximately 481 holders of record
of the Registrant's common stock.
(c) The Registrant paid an annual dividend on its common stock of $.55
per share for a total of $222,906 for fiscal 1995.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Years Ended December 31,
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
(In Thousands)
Total Assets $ 97,175 $ 84,477 $ 78,911 $ 79,904 $ 80,893
Operations:
Interest income $ 8,090 $ 6,568 $ 5,982 $ 6,468 $ 7,777
Interest expense 3,314 2,269 2,135 2,915 4,261
Net Interest
Income $ 4,776 $ 4,299 $ 3,847 $ 3,553 $ 3,516
Provision for
loan losses 62 53 118 224 719
Net interest
income
after provision
for loan losses $ 4,714 $ 4,246 $ 3,729 $ 3,329 $ 2,797
Other income $ 1,371 $ 1,264 $ 1,251 $ 1,337 $ 1,191
Other expenses $ 4,345 $ 4,116 $ 3,765 $ 3,566 $ 3,635
Income before
income taxes $ 1,740 $ 1,394 $ 1,215 $ 1,100 $ 353
Federal Income
taxes $ 590 $ 405 $ 287 $ 281 74
Net income before
extraordinary
items $ 1,150 $ 989 $ 928 $ 819 $ 279
Extraordinary
items $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Net income $ 1,150 $ 989 $ 928 $ 819 $ 279
Per Share Data:
Income after
extraordinary
items $ 2.84 $ 2.44 $ 2.27 $ 2.01 $ .680
Net income $ 2.84 $ 2.44 $ 2.27 $ 2.01 $ .680
Dividends
Declared $ .55 $ .55 $ .55 $ .55 $ .55
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about
South Banking Company's financial condition and results of operations
which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial
statement included in this report. Reference should be made to those
statements and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this
report for an understanding of the following discussion and analysis.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Financial Condition
South functions as a financial institution and as such its
financial condition should be examined in terms of trends in its sources
and uses of funds. A comparison of daily average balances indicate how
South has managed its sources and uses of funds. Included in the
selected statistical information, the comparison of daily average
balance in the business portion of the filing indicated how South has
managed its sources and uses of funds. South used its funds primarily
to support its lending activities.
South's total assets increased to $97,174,748 at year end 1995 from
$84,476,527 at year end 1994. The increase totaled $12,698,221 or
approximately 15.03% which compared to a increase rate of 7.05% for
1994. The increase in growth was attributable to improvement in the
local economies and South maintaining competitive rates for deposits as
interest rates began to rise. South loan demand was very strong
allowing South to become more active in the higher paying certificates
of deposits.
Loan demand increased during the current year as the continuing
improvement in the economy maintained the confidence level of customers
to a point where business activity has increased. Net loans increased
to $60,641,359 in 1995 for an increase of $4,472,899 or 7.96% compared
to an increase in 1994 of $6,360,363. The Banks have made an effort to
retain quality loans since loans are the highest yielding assets of the
Bank.
South's investment portfolio, including certificate of deposits in
other banks, increased to $12,246,850 from $10,401,190, an increase of
$1,845,660 compared to a decrease of $2,407,361 during 1994. Federal
funds purchased increased from $8,655,000 in 1994 to $13,335,000 in
1995. The change in the investment portfolio and federal funds sold is
attributable to South's desire to maintain sufficient liquidity to fund
higher yielding loans and to South's decision to keep investments at
short-terms when rates were low to better position ourselves to take
advantage of rising rates. The portfolio of South is primarily short-
term securities as South has purchased these securities over the past
few years when loan demand declined. As demand increased South was in
position to capitalize on the upturn of the economy. Unrealized gain
and losses on this portfolio is not material to the statement as South
maintains a slight net unrealized gain on the portfolio.
As the primary source of funds, aggregate deposits, increased by
$10,761,700 in 1995 and increased by $4,160,468 in 1994 or approximately
14.6% and 5.3%, respectively. However, the change is not consistent
with all categories. Non-interest bearing deposits decreased $606,663.
The average balance for the year on non-interest bearing deposits
increased to $13,446,000 in 1995 compared to $12,965,000 in 1994. This
is indicative of the stable core deposits and the improving economy.
Interest bearing demand deposits increased substantially to $17,098,343
from $15,350,308 for an increase of $1,748,035. Time deposits accounted
for majority of the increase in deposits. Time deposits increased by
$10,389,430 or 28.4%. The shifting of deposits within the Banks was
predictable due to changing rates and the need for many depositors to
seek higher yield for their deposits. The returns are illustrated by
the average interest rates on demand deposits which during 1995
decreased from 2.83% to 2.68% on demand accounts and 4.26% to 6.02% on
time deposits.
Liquidity
The primary function of asset/liability management is to assure
adequate liquidity and maintain an appropriate balance between interest
sensitive earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Liquidity
management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of
customers who may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or
borrowers requiring assurance that sufficient funds will be available to
meet their credit needs. Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to
avoid fluctuating net interest margins and to enhance consistent growth
of net interest income through periods of changing interest rates.
Marketable investment securities, particularly those of shorter
maturities, and federal funds sold are the principal sources of asset
liquidity. Securities maturing in one year or less amounted to
$2,466,182 and federal funds sold with daily maturities amounted to
$13,335,000 at year end 1995, an increase from prior years as the
deposit growth continues. Maturing loans and certificates of deposits
in other banks are other sources of liquidity.
Historically, the overall liquidity of South has been enhanced by
a significant aggregate amount of core deposits. These core deposits
have remained constant during this period. South has utilized less
stable short-term funding sources to enhance liquidity such as large
denomination time deposits and money market certificates within its
current customer base, but has not attempted to acquire these type of
accounts from non-core deposit customers. South has utilized its core
deposit base to help insure it maintains adequate liquidity.
South does not have current commitments, demands or uncertainties
that would affect its liquidity in a material way. South had a net loan
to deposit ratio of 71.7 percent for year end 1995 down from 77.5
percent at year end 1994. The increased liquidity that South managed
over the prior three years helped South to be able to fund the loan
demand without any liquidity problems.
Interest rate sensitivity varies with different types of interest-
earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Overnight federal
funds on which rates change daily and loans which are tied to prime
differ considerably from long-term investment and fixed rate loans.
Similarly time deposits over $100,000 and money market accounts are much
more interest sensitive than passbook savings and long-term capital
notes. The shorter-term interest rate sensitivities are key to
measuring the interest sensitivity gap, or excess interest-sensitive
earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities. An interest rate
sensitivity table is included elsewhere in document and it shows the
interest sensitivity gaps for five different time intervals as of
December 31, 1995. The first 30 days there is an excess of interest-
bearing assets over interest-bearing liabilities. South becomes more
sensitive to interest rate fluctuations on a short time period. While
the cumulative gap declines with each time interval, South remains with
a manageable position.
Capital Resources
South does not presently have commitments for significant capital
expenditures. However, there are regulatory constraints placed on the
South's capital.
In January 1989, the Federal Reserve Board released new standards
for measuring capital adequacy for U. S. banking organizations. These
standards are based on the original risk-based capital requirements
first proposed in early 1986 by U. S. bank regulators and then developed
jointly by authorities from the twelve leading industrial countries. As
a result, the standards are designed to not only provide more risk-
responsive capital guidelines for financial institutions in the U. S.,
but also incorporate a consistent framework for use by financial
institutions operating in the major international financial markets.
In general, the standards require banks and bank holding companies
to maintain capital based on "risk-adjusted" assets so that categories
of assets with potentially higher credit risk will require more capital
backing than assets with lower risk. In addition, banks and bank
holding companies are required to maintain capital to support, on a
risk-adjusted basis, certain off-balance sheet activities such as loan
commitments and interest rate swaps.
The Federal Reserve Board standards classify capital into two
tiers, referred to as Tier 1 and Tier 2. Tier 1 capital consists of
common shareholders' equity, noncumulative and cumulative (BHCs only)
perpetual preferred stock and minority interest less goodwill. Tier 2
capital consists of allowance for loan and lease losses, perpetual
preferred stock (not included in Tier 1), hybrid capital instruments,
term subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock. By
December 31, 1992, all banks were required to meet a minimum ratio of 8%
of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted total assets with at least
4% Tier 1 capital. Capital that qualifies as Tier 2 capital is limited
to 100% of Tier 1 capital.
Results of Operations
1995 Compared to 1994
Net interest income is an effective measurement of how well
management has balanced the South's interest rate sensitive assets and
liabilities. Net interest income increased by $477,147 or 11.1% in 1995
and $452,609 or 11.7% in 1994. The primary determinants of the increase
were loans and time deposits. As loan demand increased, funds were
channeled into higher yielding loans. The increase in loan demand
continue to be sufficient to offset the higher paying deposit growth.
The shifting of asset and liabilities was necessary to maintain level of
net interest income as net interest yield remain constant at 5.20%.
With the interest rate currently in the market and South current
interest rate gap, South will continue its efforts to channel funds into
higher yielding assets. Due to the rate sensitivity gap, South will
continue to attempt to improve its current position with a controlled
attempt to lengthen its maturity of interest rate sensitive liabilities.
The provision for loan loss was $994,027 in 1995 compared to
$974,866 in 1994. The provision for loan losses has been sufficient to
increase the allowance for loan losses each year. Management continues
to work its loan portfolio to minimize charge-offs and place maximum
efforts to collect previously charged off.
Other income increased slightly from the prior year. Service
charges decreased slightly in 1995 compared to 1994. This is an
indication of the higher balance being maintained by customers as the
economy has started to improve. Additionally, a small gain on
securities occurred in 1994 as a small number of sales resulted in a
small gain. Operations from data center increased as 1995 was the first
full operational year. Sales are for one bank not owned by South.
Operating cost grew at a rate of 5.84%. The increases are
primarily personnel and equipment related. Increased demands by
regulatory agencies have required some additional personnel time and
other cost continue to increase. The start up of the data processing
center in 1995 contributed to the increased operating cost. 1995 was
the first full year of data processing center operation and costs are
becomming more manageable than in the prior year of inception.
Management expects the center to become more efficient as its operation
matures.
Income tax expense was $589,746 in 1995 or 33.89% of net income
compared to $405,023 in 1994 or 29.04% of net income. The reduction in
tax free municipal bond interest in 1995, as bonds matured or were
called, also raised the effective tax rate of South. During the year
1993, FASB 109 was adopted by South with no material effect on its
financial statements; however, some adjustments were required.
Results of operations can be measured by various ratio analysis.
Two widely recognized performance indicators are the return on average
equity and the returns on average assets. South's return on equity
increased from 11.22% to 12.08%. The return on assets increased from
1.19% to 1.28%.
Results of Operations
1994 Compared to 1993
Net interest income is an effective measurement of how well
management has balanced the South's interest rate sensitive assets and
liabilities. Net interest income increased by $452,609 or 11.7% in 1994
and $399,302 or 11.2% in 1993. The primary determinants of the increase
were loans and time deposits. As loan demand increased, funds were
channeled into higher yielding loans. The increase in loan demand was
sufficient to offset the higher paying deposit growth. The shifting of
asset and liabilities was necessary to maintain level of net interest
income as net interest yield increased to 5.21% from 4.99%. With the
interest rate currently in the market and South current interest rate
gap, South will continue its efforts to channel funds into higher
yielding assets. Due to the rate sensitivity gap, South will attempt to
improve its current position with a controlled attempt to lengthen its
maturity of interest rate sensitive liabilities.
The provision for loan loss was $974,866 in 1994 compared to
$911,931 in 1993. The provision for loan losses has been sufficient to
increase the allowance for loan losses each year. During the year 1994,
loan loss recoveries exceeded the loan charged off as management
continues to work its loan portfolio to minimize charge-offs and place
maximum efforts to collect previously charged off.
Other income increased slightly from the prior year. Service
charges remained level in 1994 compared to 1993. This is an indication
of the higher balance being maintained by customers as the economy has
started to improve. Additionally, a small loss on securities occurred
in 1993 as early calls and a small number of sales resulted in a small
loss.
Operating cost grew at a rate of 9.31%. The increases are
primarily personnel, data processing and regulatory in nature.
Increased demands by regulatory agencies have required some additional
personnel time and FDIC fees and other cost continue to increase. The
start up of the data processing center in 1994 contributed to the
increased operating cost. Management expects the center to become more
efficient as its operation matures.
Income tax expense was $405,023 in 1994 or 29.04% of net income
compared to $286,472 in 1993 or 23.6% of net income. In 1993, South
recovered previous alternative minimum tax paid in 1991 to reduce the
overall tax bite. The reduction in tax free municipal bond interest in
1994, as bonds matured or were called, also raised the effective tax
rate of South. During the year 1993, FASB 109 was adopted by South with
no material effect on its financial statements; however, some
adjustments were required.
Results of operations can be measured by various ratio analysis.
Two widely recognized performance indicators are the return on average
equity and the returns on average assets. South's return on equity
decreased from 11.66% to 11.22%. The return on assets increased from
1.16% to 1.19%. Although these levels are within peer group ranges of
some other bank holding companies, management believes that improvement
for 1995 is realistic.
Results of Operations
1993 Compared to 1992
Net interest income is an effective measurement of how well
management has balanced the South's interest rate sensitive assets and
liabilities. Net interest income increased by $399,302 or 11.2% in 1993
and $36,908 or 1.05% in 1992. The primary determinants of the increase
were loans and time deposits. As loan demand increased, funds were
channeled into higher yielding loans. Management did not solicit high
interest deposits and was able to maintain stable cost of funds. The
shifting of assets and liabilities was necessary to maintain level of
net interest income as net interest yield decreased to 4.99% from 5.17%.
With the low interest rate currently in the market and South current
interest rate gap, South will continue its efforts to channel funds into
higher yielding assets. Due to the rate sensitivity gap, South will
attempt to improve its current position with a controlled attempt to
lengthen its maturity of interest rate sensitive liabilities.
The provision for loan loss was $911,931 in 1993 compared to
$738,578 in 1992. The provision for loan losses has been sufficient to
increase the allowance for loan losses each year. During the year 1993,
loan loss recoveries exceeded the loan charged off as management
continues to work its loan portfolio to minimize charge-offs and place
maximum efforts to collect previously charged off.
Other income decreased from the prior year. Service charges were
down in 1993 compared to 1992. This is an indication of the higher
balance being maintained by customers as economy has started to improve.
Additionally, a small loss on securities occurred in 1993 as early calls
and a small number of sales resulted in a small loss.
Operating cost grew at a rate of 5.59%. The increases are
primarily personnel and regulatory in nature. Increased demands by
regulatory agencies have required some additional personnel time and
FDIC fees and other cost continue to increase.
Income tax expense was $286,472 in 1993 or 23.6% of net income
compared to $281,236 in 1992 or 25.6% of net income. South continued to
recover previous alternative minimum tax paid in 1991 to reduce the
overall tax bite. During the year 1993, FASB 109 was adopted by South
with no material effect on its financial statements; however, some
adjustments were required.
Results of operations can be measured by various ratio analysis.
Two widely recognized performance indicators are the return on average
equity and the returns on average assets. South's return on equity
increased from 11.19% to 11.66%. The return on assets increased from
1.03% to 1.16%. Although these levels are within peer group ranges of
some other bank holding companies, management believes that improvement
for 1994 is realistic.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, accruing loans past
due 90 days or more and other real estate, which include foreclosures,
deeds in lieu of foreclosure and in-substance foreclosures.
A loan is generally classified as nonaccrual when full
collectibility of principal or interest is doubtful or a loan becomes 90
days past due as to principal or interest, unless management determines
that the estimated net realizable value of the collateral is sufficient
to cover the principal balance and accrued interest. When interest
accruals are discontinued, unpaid interest credited to income in the
current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is
charged to the allowance for loan losses. Nonperforming loans are
returned to performing status when the loan is brought current and has
performed in accordance with contract terms for a period of time.
Distribution of Nonperforming Assets
1995 1994 1993
(In Thousands)
Non accrual loans $ 66 $ 56 $ 100
Past due 90 days still accruing 276 33 58
Other real estate (ORE) 283 661 500
$ 625 $ 750 $ 658
Nonperforming loans to year
end loans .54% .16% 31%
Nonperforming assets to year
end loan and ORE 1.00% 1.31% 1.28%
The ratio of nonperforming assets has decreased steadily since 1992
until 1995. A slight increase occurred as ORE sales declined and a
subsequent foreclosure has increased the ORE in 1994. This decrease is
attributed to the sale of ORE and the general improvement of the loan
portfolio. Management continues to work on nonperforming assets to
further reduce this ratio.
Regulatory Matters
During the year 1995, federal and state regulatory agencies
completed asset quality examinations at the South's subsidiary banks.
The South's level and classification of identified potential problem
loans was not revised significantly as a result of this regulatory
examination process.
Examination procedures require individual judgments about a
borrower's ability to repay loans, sufficiency of collateral values and
the effects of changing economic circumstances. These procedures are
similar to those employed by South in determining the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses and in classifying loans. Judgments made by
regulatory examiners may differ from those made by management.
Management and the boards of directors of South and affiliates
evaluate existing practices and procedures on an ongoing basis. In
addition, regulators often make recommendations during the course of
their examinations that relate to the operations of South and its
affiliates. As a matter of practice, management and the boards of
directors of South and its subsidiaries consider such recommendations
promptly.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The majority of assets and liability of a financial institution are
monetary in nature; therefore, differ greatly from most commercial and
industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets
or inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the
growth of total assets in the banking industry and the resulting need to
increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain
an appropriate equity-to-assets ratio. An important effect of this has
been the reduction of asset growth to maintain appropriate levels.
Another significant effect of inflation is on other expenses, which tend
to rise during periods of general inflation.
Management believes the most significant impact on financial
results is South's ability to react to changes in interest rates. As
discussed previously, management is attempting to maintain an
essentially balanced position between interest sensitive assets and
liabilities in order to protect against wide interest rate fluctuations.
Impact of Accounting Change for Income Taxes and Tax Reform
In February 1992, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards SFAS No. 109 relating to the method of accounting for deferred
income taxes. Implementation of SFAS 109 is required for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1992. SFAS No. 109 requires companies to
take into account changes in tax rates when valuing the deferred income
tax amounts recorded on the balance sheet. The statement also requires
that deferred taxes be provided for all temporary differences between
financial statement and tax income in addition to the timing differences
in the recognition of income for financial statement and tax purposes
which were covered by prior accounting rules.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant
and its subsidiaries are included on pages F-1 through F-31 of this
Annual report on Form 10-K.
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1995 and 1994
Consolidated Statements of Income - Years ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity - Years
ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow - Year ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 9. Disagreement on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
Not applicable.
Part III.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant and their
respective ages, positions with the Registrant, principal occupation and
Common Stock of the Registrant beneficially owned as of March 1, 1995
are as follows:
Director
(Officer) of # of shares
Position with Registrator Owned
Registrant of one of Beneficiary
& Principal the Banks (Percent of
Name (Age) Occupation Since Class)
Paul T. Bennett (40) President, 1978(1)(2) 10,334
Treasurer and (3) ( 2.55%)
Director; Vice
Chairman and Director,
Citizens Bank; Vice
Chairman and Director,
Peoples State Bank &
Trust, Baxley, Georgia;
President Peoples Bank,
Lyons, Georgia; Director,
Banker's Data Services;
Director, Alma Exchange
Bank and Trust
Olivia Bennett (76) Executive Vice 1969(1)(2) 200,587
President, Secretary (3) ( 49.49%)
and Director; Chairman
and Director, Alma
Bank; Director,
Banker's Data Services
Chairman of Board,
President, Citizens Bank;
Director Peoples Bank
Lawrence Bennett (48) President and 1987(1)(2) 3,654
Director, Alma ( .9%)
Bank; Director,
Banker's Data Services;
Director, Peoples
Bank, Baxley; Director
Peoples Bank, Lyons
Charles Stuckey (48) Director; Executive 1990(3) 200
Vice President, ( .1%)
Peoples Bank; Director,
Banker's Data
Services
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant (con't)
Director
(Officer) of # of shares
Position with Registrator Owned
Registrant of one of Beneficiary
& Principal the Banks (Percent of
Name (Age) Occupation Since Class)
James W. Whiddon (51) Director; Executive
Vice President and 1989(2) 30
Director, Citizens ( -%)
Bank; Director,
Banker's Data Services
Kenneth F. Wade (53) Director; Executive 1980(1) 4,779
Vice President, Director ( 1.18%)
and Cashier, Alma Bank;
Director, Banker's
Data Services
(1) Director of Alma Bank
(2) Director of Citizens Bank
(3) Director of Peoples Bank
Included in shares owned by Olivia Bennett are 175,501 shares owned
by Estate of Valene Bennett of which she is the Executrix.
None of the directors are a director of a publicly-held corporation
which is required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Each of the Directors and Executive Officers have been engaged in
his or her present principal occupation for at least five years. Olivia
Bennett is the mother of Paul T. Bennett and Lawrence Bennett. There
are no other family relationships between any other Director or
Executive Officer. Directors serve until the next annual meeting of
shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified.
Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.
Item 11. Management Renumeration and Transactions
The following information is given as to the cash and cash
equivalent forms of renumeration received by South's CEO.
Item 11. Management Renumeration and Transactions (con't)
Long-Term Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards Payouts
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I)
Other All
Name and Annual Restricted Other
Principal Compen- Stock Options/ LTIP Compen-
Position Year Salary Bonus sation Award SARS # Payouts sation
Valene
Bennett
CEO 1995 $ 72,486 $ - $ 8,985 $ - $ - $ - $ -
1994 83,582 - 11,795 - - - -
1993 80,346 - 11,900 - - - -
1992 75,746 - 11,470 - - - -
1991 72,996 - 9,725 - - - -
Paul T.
Bennett
CEO 1995 $ 87,566 $ - $ 15,310 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Olivia
Bennett
Secretary 1995 $100,857 $ - $ 12,200 $ - $ - $ - $ -
(1) Does not include fees and dues for clubs and fraternal and civic
organizations paid by the Banks to certain officers for business related
purposes. Also does not include any amounts for use of an automobile.
Transactions with Management
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth, as of March 1, 1995, the beneficial
ownership of Common Stock of Registrant by the Only "person" (as that
term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission), who owns of
record or is known by the Registrant to own beneficially 5% or more of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Registrant and by all
Executive Officers and Directors of the Registrant as a group.
Number of Percent of
Shares Owned Outstanding
Name Beneficially Shares
Estate of Valene Bennett
Route 4
Alma, Georgia 31510 175,501 43.27%
Olivia Bennett
Route 4
Alma, Georgia 31510 25,086 6.19%
All Executive Officers and Directors
as a group (7 persons) 219,384 54.1%
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Banks have had, and expect to have in the future, banking
transactions in the ordinary course of business with Directors and
Officers of the Banks and their associates, including corporations,
partnerships and other organizations in which such Directors and
Officers have an interest, on substantially the same terms (including
interest rates and collateral) as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with unrelated parties. Such transactions have
not involved more than the normal risk of collectibility or presented
other unfavorable features.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K
Item 14(a) 1. and 3. and Item 14(d)
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
(a) South Banking Company and Subsidiaries:
(i ) Consolidated Balance sheet - December 31, 1995 and 1994
(ii ) Consolidated Statement of Income - Year ended December
31, 1995, 1994 and 1993
(iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity - Years
ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993
(iv ) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow - Year ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993
(b) South Banking Company (Parent Corporation Only):
(i ) Balance sheet - December 31, 1995 and 1994
(ii ) Statement of Income - period ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
(iii) Statement of Stockholders' Equity - Period ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993
(iv ) Statement of Cash Flow - Year ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
3. Exhibits required by Item 7 of regulation S-K:
(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws (included as
Exhibits 3(a) and (b), respectively, to Appendix II to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-14, File No. 2-
71249, previously filed with the Commission and incorporated
herein by reference).
(13) 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of South Banking
Company (note deemed filed except to the extent that sections
thereof are specifically incorporated into this report on Form
10-K by reference).
(22) List of the Registrant's subsidiaries:
(1) Alma Exchange Bank & Trust
(2) Citizens State Bank
(3) Peoples State Bank & Trust
(4) Bankers' Data Services, Inc.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K
(con't)
All of the Registrant's subsidiaries were incorporated under the
laws of the State of Georgia and are doing business in Georgia under the
above names.
(b) The registrant has not filed a Form 8-K during the last
quarter of the period.
(c) The response to this Item 14(c) is included in item
14(a).
(d) Financial Statements Schedules - None.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know all men by these present, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Valene Bennett, his attorney-in-
fact, to sign any amendments to this Report, and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith. The
Securities and Exchange Commission hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
Date: March 26, 1996
Paul T. Bennett
Principal Executive, Financial
and Accounting Officer and
Director
Date: March 26, 1996
Olivia Bennett
Executive Vice President and
Director
Date: March 26, 1996
Charles Stuckey
Director
Date: March 26, 1996
James W. Whiddon
Director
Date: March 26, 1996
Kenneth F. Wade
Director
Date: March 26, 1996
Lawrence Bennett
Director
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
Date: March 26, 1996 By:
Paul T. Bennett
President, Treasurer and
Director
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
The following supplemental information has not been sent to the
Registrant's shareholders, but will be sent subsequent to the filing of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) 1995 annual report to shareholders.
(2) Proxy statement for 1995 annual meeting of shareholders.
The foregoing materials will be furnished to the Commission when
they are sent to the shareholders since the Registrant does not have
securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The foregoing materials shall not be deemed to be "filed"
with the Commission or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section
18 or that Act.
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
ALMA, GEORGIA
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1995
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors
South Banking Company
Alma, Georgia 31510
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
of South Banking Company as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the
related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and
shareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1995. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of South Banking Company at December 31, 1995
and 1994 and the consolidated results of its operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
Respectfully submitted,
H. H. BURNET & COMPANY
February 14, 1996
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
ALMA, GEORGIA
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31, December 31,
1995 1994
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 3,989,564 $ 3,447,596
Deposits in other banks -
interest bearing $ 795,000 $ 995,000
Investment securities
Available for sale $ 8,146,274 $ 4,063,412
Held to maturity - market value of
$3,311,955 in 1995 and $4,964,722
in 1994 $ 3,305,576 $ 5,069,898
Pineland State Bank stock - at cost $ 975,141 $ -
Georgia Bankers stock $ 272,880 $ 272,880
Federal Home Loan Bank stock $ 99,900 $ -
Federal funds sold $13,335,000 $ 8,655,000
Loans $61,717,437 $57,201,948
Less: Unearned discount ( 82,051) ( 58,622)
Reserve for loan losses ( 994,027) ( 974,866))))
$60,641,359 $56,168,460
Bank premises and equipment $ 3,104,655 $ 3,252,981
Other assets $ 2,509,399 $ 2,551,300
Total Assets $97,174,748 $84,476,527
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits: Demand - non-interest bearing $14,145,230 $14,751,893
Demand - interest bearing 17,098,343 15,350,308
Savings 6,403,438 7,172,540
Time 46,898,446 36,509,016
$84,545,457 $73,783,757
Borrowing 1,976,405 1,292,238
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 604,033 402,755
Total Liabilities $87,125,895 $75,478,750
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
ALMA, GEORGIA
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (con't)
December 31, December 31,
1995 1994
Stockholder's Equity
Common stock $1 par value; shares
authorized - 1,000,000, shares
issued and outstanding -
1995 and 1994 - 405,283
and 405,283, respectively $ 405,283 $ 405,283
Surplus 3,136,238 3,136,238
Undivided profits 6,464,741 5,537,253
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities 42,591 ( 80,997)
Total Stockholders' Equity $10,048,853 $ 8,997,777
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $97,174,748 $84,476,527
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
ALMA, GEORGIA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
Interest Income
Interest and other fees
on loans $ 6,995,954 $ 5,666,373 $ 4,972,996
Interest on deposits -
interest bearing 40,904 65,241 96,289
Interest on federal funds
sold 472,289 305,906 164,160
Interest on investment
securities:
U. S. Treasury 99,131 113,783 185,308
U. S. Government agencies 273,579 218,222 285,732
Mortgage backed securities 140,159 104,969 135,560
State and municipal
subdivisions 58,584 94,106 133,104
Other securities 9,893 - 8,864
Total Interest Income $ 8,090,493 $ 6,568,600 $ 5,982,013
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits $ 3,167,719 $ 2,164,062 $ 2,086,070
Interest - other borrowing 146,402 105,313 49,327
Total Interest Expense $ 3,314,121 $ 2,269,375 $ 2,135,397
Net interest income $ 4,776,372 $ 4,299,225 $ 3,846,616
Provision for loan losses 62,200 53,500 118,000
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses $ 4,714,172 $ 4,245,725 $ 3,728,616
Other Operating Income
Service charge on deposits $ 955,791 $ 987,131 $ 982,813
Commission on insurance 63,154 57,169 72,111
Other income 163,583 213,965 215,109
Securities gains (losses) 21,591 6,000 ( 19,133)
Data processing fees 167,267 - -
Total Other Operating Income $ 1,371,386 $ 1,264,265 $ 1,250,900
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
SOUTH BANKING COMPANY
ALMA, GEORGIA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Con't)
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1995 1994 1993
Other Operating Expenses
Salaries $ 1,558,381 $ 1,474,463 $ 1,353,968
Profit sharing and other
personnel expenses 355,822 228,776 209,242
Occupancy expense of bank