Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal year ended September 30, 1997
------------------
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission File Number: 33-98490
---------
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
-----------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 06-1437793
- -------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2187 Atlantic Street, Stamford, Connecticut 06902
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)
(203) 328-7300
- --------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Units
---------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filer pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated be reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ X ]
The aggregate market value of Star Gas Partners, L.P. Common Units held by non-
affiliates of Star Gas Partners, L.P. on November 21, 1997 was approximately
$66,500,000. At November 21, 1997 there were outstanding 3,022,727 Common
Units and 2,396,078 Subordinated Units, each representing limited partner
interests.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
1997 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Page
Item 1. Business 3
Item 2. Properties 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings - Litigation 11
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 11
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Units and
Related Matters 12
Item 6. Selected Historical Financial and Operating Data 13
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 14
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 21
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure 21
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 21
Item 11. Executive Compensation 25
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management 27
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 30
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
Reports on Form 8-K 31
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
STRUCTURE
Star Gas Partners L.P. (the "Partnership" or the "MLP") was formed on October
16, 1995 to acquire and operate the propane business of Star Gas Corporation
(the "Company", "Star Gas" or the "General Partner") and its parent corporation
Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. ("Petro" and, together with Star Gas
collectively the "Star Gas Group" or the "Predecessor Company"). Substantially
all of the consolidated assets and liabilities of the MLP are accounted for by
Star Gas Propane, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership" or the "OLP") in which the
MLP owns a 99% limited partnership interest and the Company owns a 1% general
partnership interest.
The General Partner directs and manages all activities of the Partnerships
and the Operating Partnership and is reimbursed on a monthly basis for all
direct and indirect expenses it incurs on their behalf, including the cost of
employees.
ACQUISITION OF PEARL GAS
On October 22, 1997, the OLP completed its acquisition of Pearl Gas Co.
("Pearl") which is based in Bowling Green, Ohio. Pearl sells over 14 million
gallons of propane annually to over 12,000 customers, operating in northwest
Ohio, southern Michigan and northeast Indiana. Over 80% of Pearl's volume is
sold to residential customers.
BUSINESS
The Partnership is primarily engaged in the retail distribution of propane
and related supplies and equipment to residential, commercial, industrial,
agricultural and motor fuel customers. Including the operations of Pearl Gas
Co., the Partnership believes that it is the eighth largest retail propane
distributor in the United States, serving approximately 162,000 customers from
54 branch locations and 30 satellite storage facilities in the Midwest and 18
branch locations and 15 satellite storage facilities in the Northeast. The
Partnership also serves approximately 60 wholesale customers from its wholesale
operation in southern Indiana.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Propane is used primarily for space heating, water heating and cooking by
residential and commercial customers, which constitute the largest portion of
the customer base. Propane is extracted from natural gas or oil wellhead gas at
processing plants or separated from crude oil during the refining process.
Propane is normally transported and stored in a liquid state under moderate
pressure or refrigeration for ease of handling in shipping and
distribution. When the pressure is released or the temperature is increased, it
is usable as a flammable gas. Propane is colorless and odorless; an odorant is
added to allow its detection. Propane is clean-burning, producing negligible
amounts of pollutants when consumed. According to the National Propane Gas
Association, the domestic retail market for propane is approximately 9.4 billion
gallons annually,
3
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND (CONTINUED)
with limited growth for retail demand for the product. Based upon information
contained in the Energy Information Administration's Annual Energy Review-1995,
propane accounts for approximately 3.8% of household energy consumption in the
United States.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Partnership's strategy is to maximize its cash flow and profitability,
primarily through internal growth, controlling operating costs and acquisitions
which have the potential for generating attractive returns on investment. The
retail propane industry is mature and experiences only limited growth in total
demand for the product. The propane industry is also large and highly
fragmented, with approximately 6,000 independently owned and operated
distributors. The Partnership focuses on acquiring smaller to medium-sized
local and regional independent propane distributors, particularly those with a
relatively large percentage of residential customers, which generate higher
margins than other types of customers, and those located in the Midwest and
Northeast, where the Partnership believes it can attain higher margins than in
other areas of the United States.
Although there are no formal arrangements between Petro and the Partnership,
the Partnership anticipates that it will continue to have access to Petro's
management expertise. In particular, the Partnership believes that the
extensive experience of Petro's management team in making acquisitions in the
home heating oil industry, which has many similar characteristics to the propane
industry provides the Partnership with a competitive advantage. Additionally,
the field of potential acquisition candidates for the Partnership is broadened
because of the ability to acquire companies with both home heating oil and
propane operations, with the Partnership retaining the propane, operations and
Petro retaining the home heating oil operations or the Partnership retaining
both the propane and the home heating oil operations or the Partnership
retaining both the propane and the home heating oil operations. In this regard,
although the Partnership does not presently have any home heating oil
operations, it may consider acquiring or retaining such operations in the future
to the extent that the Partnership is able to identify attractive acquisition
candidates in the home heating oil field.
In order to facilitate the Partnership's acquisition strategy, the Operating
Partnership has entered into the Bank Credit Facilities which consist of a $25.0
million Acquisition Facility (of which $21.0 million was outstanding as of
October 31, 1997) and a $12.0 million Working Capital Facility (of which $2.4
million was outstanding as of October 31, 1997). In addition to borrowings
under the Bank Credit Facilities, the Partnership may fund future acquisitions
from internal cash flow, the issuance of additional Partnership interests or
incurrence of additional long-term debt.
While the Partnership regularly considers and evaluates acquisitions as part
of its ongoing acquisition program, the Partnership does not have any present
agreements or commitments with respect to any acquisition. There can be no
assurance that the Partnership will identify attractive acquisition candidates
in the future or that it will be able to acquire such candidates or obtain
financing for such acquisitions on acceptable terms. If the Partnership is able
to make acquisitions, there can be no assurance, however, that such acquisitions
will not dilute earnings and distributions to Unitholders. The General Partner
has broad discretion in making acquisitions and it is expected that the General
Partner will not generally seek Unitholder approval of acquisitions.
MARKETING AND OPERATIONS
As of October 31, 1997, the Partnership distributed propane to approximately
162,000 retail customers in 13 states from 72 branch locations. The
Partnership's operations are conducted under several leading trademarks and
trade names, including: Star Gas(R), Star Gas Service/TM/, Silgas/TM/, Blue
Flame(R), Maingas/TM/,
4
MARKETING AND OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Arrow Gas/TM/, Mid-Hudson Valley Propane/TM/, Coleman Gas Service/TM/, H & S
Gas/TM/, Isch Gas/TM/, Wilhoyte L.P. Gas/TM/ and Rural Natural Gas/TM/ and Pearl
Gas/TM/. (The Partnership does not have the right to use the trademark Star
Gas(R) in the State of New York nor does the Partnership have the right to use
the Blue Flame(R) trademark in certain limited areas outside of the
Partnership's current area of operations). The marketing areas served by the
Partnership are generally rural but also include suburban areas where natural
gas is generally not available.
The Partnership's retail operations are located primarily in the Northeast and
Midwest regions of the United States:
NORTHEAST MIDWEST
- --------- -------
CONNECTICUT PENNSYLVANIA INDIANA KENTUCKY (continued)
Stamford Hazelton Akron Shelbyville
Hartford Wind Gap Batesville Williamstown
Bedford
MAINE RHODE ISLAND Bluffton MICHIGAN
Fairfield Davisville Coal City Hillsdale
Fryeburg College Corner Somerset Center
Skowhegan Columbia City
Wells Decatur OHIO
Windham Ferdinand Bowling Green
Greencastle Cincinnati
MASSACHUSETTS Jeffersonville Defiance
Belchertown Linton Deshler
Rochdale Madison Ft. Recovery
Westfield New Salisbury Hebron
Swansea N. Manchester Ironton
N. Vernon Kenton
NEW HAMPSHIRE N. Webster Lancaster
(from Fryeburg, ME) Portland Lewisburg
Remington Lynchburg
NEW JERSEY Richmond Macon
Maple Shade Salem Maumee
Tuckahoe Seymour McClure
Sulphur Springs Milford
NEW YORK Versailles Mt. Orab
Poughkeepsie Warren North Star
Washingtonville Waterloo Ripley
Winamac Sabina
Waverly
KENTUCKY West Union
Glencoe
Prospect WEST VIRGINIA
(from Ironton, OH)
The distribution of propane at the retail level generally involves large
numbers of small deliveries averaging 100-150 gallons each to residential,
commercial, industrial, agricultural and motor fuel users. Homeowners or
residential customers use propane primarily for space heating, water heating,
clothes drying and cooking. Commercial customers such as motels, restaurants,
5
MARKETING AND OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
retail stores and laundromats, generally use propane for the same purposes as
residential customers. Industrial users, such as manufacturers, use propane as
a heating and energy source in manufacturing and drying processes. In addition,
propane is used to dry crops, cure tobacco and as a fuel source for certain
motor vehicles.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, approximately 71% of the
Partnership's sales (by volume of gallons sold) were to retail customers (of
which approximately 52%, 21%, 18% and 9% were sales to residential customers,
industrial/commercial customers, agricultural customers and motor fuel
customers, respectively) and approximately 29% were to wholesale customers.
Sales to residential customers in fiscal year 1997 accounted for 62% of the
Partnership's gross profit on propane sales, reflecting the higher-margin nature
of this segment of the market.
From its branch locations, the Partnership also sells, installs and services
equipment related to its propane distribution business, including heating and
cooking appliances and, at some locations, rents water softeners. Typical
branch locations consist of an office, appliance showroom, warehouse and service
facilities, with one or more 12,000 to 30,000 gallon bulk storage tanks on or
near the premises. Satellite facilities typically contain only storage tanks.
Retail deliveries of propane are usually made to customers by means of the
Partnership's fleet of 269 bobtail and rack trucks. Propane is pumped from the
bobtail truck, which generally holds 2,000 to 3,000 gallons, into a stationary
storage tank on the customer's premises. The Partnership generally owns these
storage tanks. The capacity of these tanks ranges from approximately 24 gallons
to approximately 1,000 gallons. The Partnership also delivers propane to retail
customers in portable cylinders, which typically are picked up and replenished
at the Partnership distribution locations, then returned to the retail customer.
To a limited extent, the Partnership also delivers propane to certain end users
of propane in larger trucks known as transports (which have an average capacity
of approximately 9,000 gallons). End users receiving transport deliveries
include industrial customers, large-scale heating accounts, such as local gas
utilities which use propane as a supplemental fuel to meet peak demand
requirements, and large agricultural accounts which use propane for crop drying
and space heating. "See Item 2--Properties".
A majority of the Partnership's residential customers receive their propane
supply pursuant to an automatic delivery system which eliminates the customer's
need to make an affirmative purchase decision. The Partnership delivers propane
to its customers an average of approximately six times during the year,
depending upon weather conditions and historical consumption patterns. In
addition, the Partnership provides emergency service seven days a week, 52 weeks
a year. Management believes its propane customer base to be relatively stable.
In excess of 95% of the Partnership's retail propane customers lease their tanks
from the Partnership. In most states, certain fire safety regulations restrict
the refilling of a leased tank solely to the propane supplier that owns the
tank. The inconvenience associated with switching tanks greatly reduces a
propane customer's tendency to change distributors.
Profits in the retail propane business are primarily based on margins, the
cents-per-gallon difference between the purchase price and the sales price of
propane. The Partnership generally purchases propane in the contract and spot
markets, primarily from natural gas processors and major oil companies, for its
short-term requirements, therefore, its supply costs fluctuate with market price
fluctuations. Should wholesale propane prices decline in the future, the
6
MARKETING AND OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Partnership's margins on its retail propane distribution business should
increase in the short-term because retail prices tend to change less rapidly
than wholesale prices. Should the wholesale cost of propane increase, for
similar reasons retail margins and profitability would likely be reduced at
least for the short-term until retail prices can be increased.
The retail market for propane is seasonal because it is used primarily for
heating in residential and commercial buildings. Approximately 70% - 75% of the
Partnership's retail propane volume is sold during the peak heating season from
October through March, as many customers use propane for heating purposes.
Consequently, sales and operating profits are largely generated in the first
and second fiscal quarters (October through March). To the extent necessary,
the Partnership will reserve cash flows from the first and second quarters for
distribution to holders of Common Units in the third and fourth fiscal quarters.
In addition, sales volume traditionally fluctuates from year to year in response
to variations in weather, prices and other factors. The Partnership believes
that the broad geographic distribution of its operations helps to minimize
exposure to regional weather or economic patterns.
SUPPLY
The Partnership obtains propane from over 25 sources, all of which are
domestic or Canadian oil companies, including Amoco Canada Marketing Group;
Ashland Petroleum Company; Bayway Refining Company; Ferrell North America;
Marathon Oil Company; Markwest Hydrocarbons; Mobil Oil Company; Petro Canada LPG
Inc.; Shell Canada Limited; Shell Oil Company; and Warren Gas Liquids, Inc.
Supplies from these sources have traditionally been readily available, although
no assurance can be given that supplies of propane will be readily available in
the future.
Substantially all of the Partnership's propane supply for its Northeast
retail operations are purchased under annual or longer term supply contracts,
which generally provide for pricing in accordance with market prices at the time
of delivery. Certain of the contracts provide for minimum and maximum amounts
of propane to be purchased. During the year ended September 30, 1997, none of
the Partnership's Northeast suppliers accounted for more than 10% of the
Partnership's volumes.
The Partnership typically supplies its Midwest retail and wholesale
operations by a combination of (i) spot purchases from suppliers at Mont.
Belvieu, Texas, which are transported by pipeline to the Partnership's 21
million gallon underground storage facility in Seymour, Indiana ("the Seymour
Facility"), and then delivered to the Midwest branches and (ii) purchases from a
number of Midwest refineries which are transported by truck to the branches
either directly or via the Seymour facility. Most of the refinery purchases are
purchased under contract.
The Seymour facility is located on the TEPPCO Partners, L.P. pipeline system.
The pipeline is connected to the Mont. Belvieu storage facilities and is one of
the largest conduits of supply for the U.S. propane industry. The Seymour
facility allows the Partnership to buy and store large quantities of propane
during periods of low demand, which generally occur during the summer months.
The General Partner believes that this ability allows the Partnership to achieve
cost savings to an extent generally not available to the Partnership's
competitors in its Midwest markets.
7
SUPPLY (CONTINUED)
For fiscal 1997, 43% of the Midwest volume was purchased on the spot market
from various Mont. Belvieu sources, and 21% was purchased from three refineries
in Illinois and Indiana owned by the Amoco Canada Marketing Group. The balance
was purchased from five separate suppliers. The Partnership believes that its
diversification of suppliers will enable it to purchase all of its supply needs
at market prices if supplies are interrupted from any of the sources, without a
material disruption of its operations.
Propane is generally transported from refineries, pipeline terminals and
storage facilities (including the Partnership's Seymour facility), and coastal
terminals to the Partnership's branch location bulk plants by a combination of
the Partnership's own highway transport fleet, common carriers, owner-operators
and railroad tank cars. Branches and their related satellites typically have
one or more 12,000 to 30,000 gallon storage tanks.
COMPETITION
The Partnership's business is highly competitive. However, long-standing
customer relationships are typical of the retail propane industry. Retail
propane customers generally lease their storage tanks from their suppliers. The
lease terms and, in most states, certain fire safety regulations restrict the
refilling of a leased tank solely to the propane supplier that owns the tank.
The inconvenience of switching tanks minimizes a customer's tendency to switch
among suppliers of propane.
The ability to compete effectively further depends on the reliability of
service, responsiveness to customers and the ability to maintain competitive
prices. The Partnership believes that its superior service capabilities and
customer responsiveness differentiate it from many of its competitors. Branch
operations offer emergency service twenty-four hours per day, seven days per
week.
Propane competes primarily with electricity, natural gas and fuel oil as an
energy source on the basis of price, availability and portability. Propane is
generally less expensive to use than electricity for space heating, water
heating, clothes drying and cooking and competes effectively in those parts of
the country where propane is cheaper than electricity on an equivalent British
Thermal Unit basis. Propane is generally more expensive than natural gas, but
serves as an alternative to natural gas in rural and suburban areas where
natural gas is unavailable or portability of product is required. The expansion
of natural gas into traditional propane markets has historically been inhibited
by the capital costs required to expand distribution and pipeline systems.
Although the extension of natural gas pipelines tends to displace propane
distribution in the areas affected, the Partnership believes that new
opportunities for propane sales arise as more geographically remote areas are
developed. Although propane is similar to fuel oil in space heating and water
heating applications as well as in market demand and price, propane and fuel oil
have generally developed their own distinct geographic markets. Because
furnaces and appliances that burn propane will not operate on fuel oil, a
conversion from one fuel to the other requires the installation of new
equipment.
In addition to competing with alternative energy sources, the Partnership
competes with other companies engaged in the retail propane distribution
business. Competition in the propane industry is highly fragmented and
generally occurs on a local basis with other large full-service multi-state
propane marketers, smaller local independent marketers and farm cooperatives.
Based on industry publications, the Partnership believes that the ten largest
multi-state
8
COMPETITION (CONTINUED)
marketers, including the Partnership, account for less than 35% of the total
retail sales of propane in the United States, and that no single marketer has a
greater than 10% share of the total retail market in the United States. Most of
the Partnership's branches compete with five or more marketers or distributors.
The principal factors influencing competition among propane marketers are price
and service. Each retail distribution outlet operates in its own competitive
environment as retail marketers locate in close proximity to customers to lower
the cost of providing service. The typical retail distribution outlet has an
effective marketing radius of approximately 35 miles.
EMPLOYEES
The Partnership has no employees, except for certain employees of its
corporate subsidiary, Stellar Propane Service Corporation and is managed by the
General Partner pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. As of October 31, 1997,
Star Gas had 630 employees providing full time services to the Operating
Partnership, of which 44 were employed by the corporate office in Stamford,
Connecticut and 586 were located in branch offices, of which 191 were
administrative, 281 were engaged in transportation and storage and 114 were
engaged in field servicing. Approximately 78 of Star Gas' employees are
represented by six different local chapters of labor unions.
Management believes that its relations with both its union and non-union
employees are satisfactory.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
The Partnership is subject to various federal, state and local environmental,
health and safety laws and regulations. Generally, these laws impose
limitations on the discharge of pollutants and establish standards for the
handling of solid and hazardous wastes. These laws include the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), the Clean Air Act, the Occupational
Safety and Health Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act,
the Clean Water Act and comparable state statues. CERCLA, also known as the
"Superfund" law, imposes joint and several liability without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons that are
considered to have contributed to the release or threatened release of a
hazardous substance into the environment. Propane is not a hazardous substance
within the meaning of CERCLA. Such laws and regulations could result in civil
or criminal penalties in cases of non-compliance or impose liability for
remediation costs. To date, the Partnership has not been named as a party to
any litigation in which the Partnership is alleged to have violated or otherwise
incurred liability under any of the foregoing laws and regulations.
In connection with all acquisitions of retail propane businesses that involve
the purchase of real estate, the Partnership conducts a due diligence
investigation to attempt to determine whether any substance other than propane
has been sold from, or stored, on any such real estate prior to its purchase.
Such due diligence includes questioning the seller, obtaining representations
and warranties concerning the seller's compliance with environmental laws and
visual inspections of the properties, in which employees of the General Partner,
and in certain cases, independent environmental consulting firms hired by the
General Partner, look for evidence of hazardous substances or the existence of
underground storage tanks.
9
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS (CONTINUED)
National Fire Protection Association Pamphlets No. 54 and No. 58, which
establish rules and procedures governing the safe handling of propane, or
comparable regulations, have been adopted as the industry standard in all of the
states in which the Partnership operates. In some states these laws are
administered by state agencies, and in others they are administered on a
municipal level. With respect to the transportation of propane by truck, the
Partnership is subject to regulations promulgated under the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Act. These regulations cover the transportation of hazardous
materials and are administered by the United States Department of
Transportation. The Partnership conducts ongoing training programs to help
ensure that its operations are in compliance with applicable regulations. The
Partnership maintains various permits that are necessary to operate some of its
facilities, some of which may be material to its operations. Management
believes that the procedures currently in effect at all of its facilities for
the handling, storage and distribution of propane are consistent with industry
standards and are in compliance in all material respects with applicable laws
and regulations.
On August 18, 1997, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the "DOT")
published its Final Rule for Continued Operation of the Present Propane Trucks
(the "Final Rule"). The Final Rule is intended to address perceived risks during
the transfer of propane. The Final Rule required certain immediate changes in
the industry operating procedures, including retrofitting all propane delivery
trucks. The Partnership, as well as the National Propane Gas Association
("NPGA") and the propane industry in general, believe that the Final Rule cannot
practicably be complied with in its current form. On October 15, 1997, five of
the principal multi-state propane marketers (unrelated to the Partnership) filed
an action against the DOT in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Missouri seeking to enjoin enforcement of the Final Rule. The NPGA
subsequently filed a similar suit. In addition, in November 1997, a bill was
introduced in the United State House of Representatives that would prohibit the
DOT from enforcing certain provisions of the Final Rule. At this time, the
Partnership cannot determine the likely outcome of the litigation or the
proposed legislation or what the ultimate long-term cost of compliance with the
Final Rule will be to the Partnership and the propane industry in general.
Future developments, such as stricter environmental, health or safety laws
and regulations thereunder, could affect Partnership operations. It is not
anticipated that the Partnership's compliance with or liabilities under
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including CERCLA, will
have a material adverse effect on the Partnership. To the extent that there are
any environmental liabilities unknown to the Partnership or environmental,
health or safety laws or regulations are made more stringent, there can be no
assurance that the Partnership's results of operations will not be materially
and adversely affected.
10
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of October 31, 1997, the Partnership owned 58 of its 72 branch locations
and 34 of its 45 satellite storage facilities and leased the balance. In
addition, the Partnership owns the Seymour facility, in which it stores propane
for itself and third parties. The Partnership leases its corporate headquarters
in Stamford, Connecticut, as well as office and training facilities in the
Midwest.
The transportation of propane requires specialized equipment. The trucks
utilized for this purpose carry specialized steel tanks that maintain the
propane in a liquefied state. As of October 31, 1997, the Partnership had a
fleet of 28 tractors, 38 transport trailers, 269 bobtail and rack trucks and 314
other service and pick-up trucks, the majority of which are owned. The
Partnership owns 20 and leases 33 automobiles. As of October 31, 1997, the
Partnership owned approximately 238 bulk storage tanks with typical capacities
of 12,000 to 30,000 gallons, approximately 203,000 stationary customer storage
tanks with typical capacities of 24 to 1,000 gallons and approximately 34,000
portable propane cylinders with typical capacities of 5 to 24 gallons. The
obligations of the Partnership under its borrowings are secured by liens and
mortgages on all real and personal property of the Partnership.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - LITIGATION
Propane is a flammable, combustible gas. Serious personal injury and
property damage can occur in connection with its transportation, storage or use.
The Partnership, in the ordinary course of business, is threatened with or is
named as a defendant in various lawsuits which, among other items, seek actual
and punitive damages for product liability, personal injury and property damage.
However, the Partnership is not a party to any litigation which individually or
in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect
on the results of operations or the financial condition of the Partnership. The
Partnership maintains liability insurance policies with insurers in such amounts
and with such coverages and deductibles as the General Partner believes is
reasonable and prudent. However, there can be no assurance that such insurance
will be adequate to protect the Partnership from material expenses related to
such personal injury or property damage or that such levels of insurance will
continue to be available in the future at economical prices.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the security holders of the
Partnership during the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997.
11
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S UNITS AND RELATED MATTERS
The Common Units, representing common limited partner interests in the
Partnership, are listed and traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the
symbol SGASZ. The Common Units began trading on December 20, 1995, at an
initial public offering price of $22.00 per Common Unit. The following table
sets forth the high and low closing prices for the Common Units on the NASDAQ
National Market and the cash distribution declared per Common Unit for the
periods indicated.
COMMON UNIT PRICE RANGE DISTRIBUTIONS
HIGH LOW DECLARED PER UNIT
------------------------------------------------ --------------------
Fiscal Quarter 1996 1997 1996 1997 1996 1997
- -------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
First Quarter $22.50 $23.88 $22.00 $21.75 -- $0.55
Second Quarter $22.50 $24.63 $21.13 $20.75 -- $0.55
Third Quarter $22.00 $21.88 $19.75 $19.00 $0.6225/(a)/ $0.55
Fourth Quarter $24.75 $23.50 $20.50 $21.00 $0.5500 $0.55
- ---------
(a) This distribution amounted to $0.6225 per unit and represented a pro rata
distribution of $0.0725 per unit for the period December 20, 1995 to
December 31, 1995 and a quarterly distribution of $0.55 per unit for the
three months ended March 31, 1996.
As of September 30, 1997, there were approximately 104 holders of record of
the Partnership's Common Units. There is no established public trading market
for the Partnership's 2,396,073 subordinated units, representing limited partner
interests ("Subordinated Units") which are all held by Star Gas Corporation.
The Partnership makes quarterly distributions to its partners in an aggregate
amount equal to its Available Cash (as defined) for such quarter. Available
Cash generally means, with respect to any fiscal quarter of the Partnership, all
cash on hand at the end of such quarter, plus all additional cash on hand as of
the date of determination resulting from borrowings subsequent to the end of
such quarter, less the amount of cash reserves required under certain lending
arrangements and certain discretionary reserves established by the General
Partners for future cash requirements. These reserves are retained to provide
for the proper conduct of the Partnership's business, the payment of debt
principal and interest and to provide funds for distribution during the next
four quarters. The full definition of Available Cash is set forth in the
Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership. The information concerning
restrictions on distributions required by Item 5 is incorporated herein by
reference to Note 10 to the Partnership's Consolidated Financial Statements
which begin on page F-1 of this Report. Distributions of Available Cash to the
Subordinated Unitholders are subject to the prior rights of the Common
Unitholders to receive the Minimum Quarterly Distribution ("MQD") for each
quarter during the subordination period, and to receive any arrearages in the
distribution of the MQD on the Common Units for prior quarters during the
subordination period.
12
ITEM 6. SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following table sets forth selected historical and other data of the
Partnership and the Star Gas Group and should be read in conjunction with the
more detailed financial statements included elsewhere in this report. See Item
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
The Selected Financial Data is derived from the financial information of the
Partnership and should be read in conjunction therewith.
Partnership/Star Gas Group--Historical
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended September 30,
------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996(a) 1997
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands, except for per unit data)
Sales....................................... $ 143,216 $ 128,040 $ 104,550 $ 119,634 $ 135,159
Gross profit................................ 69,861 69,487 54,890 61,077 62,948
Depreciation and amortization............... 16,703 13,039 10,073 9,808 10,405
Operating income (loss)..................... (30,313)(c) 9,393 2,555(b) 9,802 9,003
Interest expense (net)...................... 16,479 10,497 8,549 7,124 6,966
Net income (loss)........................... (47,049)(c) (1,404) (6,169)(b) 2,593 2,012
Net income per Unit(d)...................... -- -- $ .11(f) $ .37
Cash distribution declared per unit......... -- -- $ 1.17(f) $ 2.20
BALANCE SHEET DATA (END OF PERIOD):
Current assets.............................. $ 20,637 $ 17,374 $ 14,266 $ 17,842 $ 14,165
Total assets................................ 157,847 147,608 155,393 156,913 147,469
Long-term debt.............................. 123,992 70,163 1,389 85,000 85,000
Due to Petro................................ 4,723 8,809 86,002 -- --
Predecessor's equity (deficiency)/Partners'
Capital..................................... (2,825) 44,328 44,305 61,398 51,578
OTHER DATA:
EBITDA(e)................................... $ 19,652 $ 21,946 $ 13,541(b) $ 19,870 $ 19,703
Retail propane gallons sold................. 114,405 110,069 89,133 96,294 94,893
- ----------------------------------
(a) Reflects the results of operations of the Predecessor Company for the period
October 1, 1995 through December 20, 1995 and the results of Star Gas
Partners, L.P. from December 20, 1995 through September 30, 1996. The
operating results for the year ended September 30, 1996 were combined to
facilitate an analysis of the fundamental operating data. For the actual
results of the Partnership from December 20, 1995 through September 30,
1996, see Item 14, Page F-4.
(b) The decline in operating income, net income and EBITDA during the fiscal
year 1995 was primarily due to the significantly warmer than normal weather
conditions during the 1995 heating season.
(c) Includes a loss of approximately $33.0 million in respect of a charge for
the impairment of long-lived assets.
(d) Net income per Unit is computed by dividing the limited partners' interest
in net income by the limited partners' weighted average number of units
outstanding.
(e) EBITDA is defined as operating income plus depreciation, amortization, less
net gain (loss) on sale of businesses and equipment and other non-cash
charges (including the impairment of long-lived assets). EBITDA should not
be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating
performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or
ability to service debt obligations), but provides additional information
for evaluating the Partnership's ability to make the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution.
(f) Represents net income per unit and cash distributions paid per unit for the
period December 20, 1995 through September 30, 1996.
13
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
In analyzing the historical financial results of the Star Gas Group and the
financial results of the Partnership, the following matters, should be
considered.
Following Petro's initial investment in Star Gas in December 1993, new
management initiated significant restructuring efforts in order to focus and
expand its operations in its most profitable geographic markets, the Midwest and
Northeast. These activities included Star Gas' divestiture of its Texas
operation in August 1994, the sale of its southern Georgia operations in
November 1994, and the completion of six acquisitions totaling 4.7 million
gallons annually in its core Midwest and Northeast markets from June 1994 to
July 1996. The results for fiscal 1997 do not include the operating results of
the Partnership's most recent acquisition, Pearl Gas Co., which was completed on
October 22, 1997.
Gross profit margins vary according to the customer mix. For example, sales
to certain customer groups, such as residential or commercial, generate higher
gross profit margins than sales to other customer groups, such as agricultural
customers. Accordingly, a change in customer mix can affect gross profit
without necessarily impacting total sales.
Because propane's primary use is for heating in residential and commercial
buildings, weather conditions have a significant impact on the financial
performance of the Partnership. Management believes that despite year-to-year
fluctuations, average temperatures have been relatively stable over time.
Nevertheless, as reflected by the unusually warm weather in fiscal 1995, actual
yearly weather conditions can vary substantially from historical averages.
Accordingly, in analyzing changes in financial performance, the weather
conditions in which the Partnership/Star Gas Group operated in any given period
should be considered.
The following discussion reflects the results of operations and operating
data of the Predecessor Company for the year ended September 30, 1995 and is
compared to the combined results of the Predecessor Company for the period
October 1, 1995 through December 20, 1995, and the results of the MLP from
December 20, 1995 through September 30, 1996 and for the year ended September
30, 1997. The operating results of the Predecessor Company and the MLP for the
year ended September 30, 1996 were combined to facilitate an analysis of the
fundamental operating data.
14
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
- ------------------------------------
COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- ------------------------------------------------
VOLUME
For the year ended September 30, 1997, retail propane volume declined 1.4
million gallons, or 1.5%, to 94.9 million gallons, as compared to 96.3 million
gallons for fiscal 1996. The decline was primarily attributable to the effect
on volume of warmer temperatures experienced during the second fiscal quarter
compared to the prior year's second fiscal quarter and to customer conservation
efforts attributable to significantly higher propane selling prices. The
Partnership was able to mitigate the effects of the warmer temperatures on
retail propane volume through both internal account growth and two acquisitions
completed since March 15, 1996. Also favorably impacting the year-to-year
comparison was an increase in sales to agricultural customers, resulting from a
return to more normal propane demand for grain drying.
SALES
For the year ended September 30, 1997, sales increased $15.5 million, or 13.0%,
to $135.2 million, as compared to $119.6 million for the year ended September
30, 1996. The increase was due to higher selling prices in response to an
industry wide significant increase in propane supply costs experienced during
fiscal 1997.
COST OF SALES
Cost of sales increased $13.7 million, or 23.3%, to $72.2 million for fiscal
1997, as compared to $58.6 million for fiscal 1996. The increase was due to
higher per gallon propane supply costs.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit increased $1.9 million, or 3.1%, to $62.9 million for fiscal 1997,
as compared to $61.1 million for fiscal 1996. The increase in gross profit
resulted from higher per gallon margins across all market segments which was
partially offset by the impact of slightly lower retail propane volume.
DELIVERY AND BRANCH EXPENSES
Delivery and branch expenses increased $1.7 million, or 4.8%, to $36.4 million
for fiscal 1997, as compared to $34.8 million for fiscal 1996. The increase was
primarily due to the additional expenses associated with the first fiscal
quarter's increase in agricultural volume, higher vehicle operating costs due to
an increase in fuel costs and higher employee benefit expenses.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.6 million, or 6.1%, to $10.4
million for fiscal 1997, as compared to $9.8 million for fiscal 1996, due to the
impact of two acquisitions completed since March 15, 1996, the amortization of
certain deferred charges relating to the Partnership's First Mortgage Notes and
depreciation expense associated with capital expenditures made during fiscal
1997 and 1996.
15
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 5.6%, to $6.8
million for fiscal 1997, as compared to $6.5 million for fiscal 1996. This
increase was primarily due to $0.9 million of one-time expenses associated with
the exploration of strategic alternatives designed to maximize unitholder value
including, without limitation, the sale or merger of the Partnership offset by
lower acquisition related expenses. On March 3, 1997, the Partnership decided to
terminate its efforts to seek a merger or possible sale of the Partnership.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET
Interest expense , net declined $0.1 million, or 2.2%, to $7.0 million for
fiscal 1997, as compared to $7.1 million for fiscal 1996. This reduction was
primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rate.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Income tax expense primarily represents certain state income taxes related to
the Partnership's wholly owned corporate subsidiary which conducts non-
qualifying master limited partnership business.
NET INCOME
Net income decreased $0.6 million or 22.4% to $2.0 million for fiscal 1997, as
compared to $2.6 million for fiscal 1996. This decrease was attributable to the
increase in operating expenses, $0.9 million of one-time costs associated with
the exploration of strategic alternatives and $0.6 million of depreciation and
amortization which was partially offset by $1.9 million increase in gross
profit.
EBITDA
EBITDA (defined as operating income (loss) plus depreciation and amortization
less net gain (loss) on sales of businesses and equipment) decreased $0.2
million, or 1.0%, to $19.7 million for fiscal 1997, as compared to $19.9 million
for fiscal 1996. Excluding the one-time expenses associated with the strategic
alternative, EBITDA increased $0.7 million, or 3.7%, to $20.6 million due to
improved per gallon margins across all market segments and growth in the
customer base provided by both internal marketing and acquisition efforts.
EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator
of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of
liquidity or ability to service debt obligations) but provides additional
information for evaluating the Partnership's ability to make the Minimum
Quarterly Distribution.
16
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
- ------------------------------------
COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
- ------------------------------------------------
VOLUME
For the year ended September 30, 1996, retail propane volume increased 8.0%
or 7.2 million gallons to 96.3 million gallons, as compared to 89.1 million
gallons for the year ended September 30, 1995. Excluding the divested southern
Georgia operations, which contributed 1.9 million gallons in fiscal 1995, retail
propane volume increased 10.4% or 9.1 million gallons. Propane sold to
residential and commercial customers increased 17.9% or 11.5 million gallons,
due to colder temperatures, acquisitions and internal account growth. Based on
degree days in areas in which the Partnership operates, fiscal 1996 was 6.5%
colder than normal and 19.5% colder than fiscal 1995. While the residential and
commercial market segments were favorably impacted by the colder temperatures,
sales to agricultural customers, who use propane predominately in the grain
drying process, declined by approximately 2.5 million gallons primarily due to
the unusually dry crop harvest during the first fiscal quarter. For fiscal
1996, propane sold to wholesale customers was 39.0 million gallons, virtually
unchanged from the fiscal 1995 level.
SALES
Sales increased 14.4% or $15.0 million, to $119.6 million for fiscal 1996, as
compared to $104.6 million for fiscal 1995. Excluding the results attributable
to the southern Georgia operations, which contributed $2.1 million of sales in
fiscal 1995, sales rose $17.1 million or 16.7% due to increased volume and
higher retail and wholesale selling prices.
COST OF SALES
Cost of sales increased 17.9% or $8.9 million to $58.6 million for fiscal
1996, as compared to $49.7 million for fiscal 1995. While cost of sales
declined by $1.0 million due to the disposition of the southern Georgia assets,
cost of sales in the core Midwest and Northeast operations increased by $9.9
million due to the increase in volume and higher per gallon wholesale propane
costs. During the first quarter of fiscal 1996, the partnership was able to
lower its cost of sales through the utilization of its underground storage
facility, however, this benefit was offset during the second fiscal quarter by a
rapid spike in wholesale propane costs.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit increased 11.3% or $6.2 million, to $61.1 million for fiscal
1996 as compared to $54.9 million for fiscal 1995. Excluding $1.0 million of
gross profit earned by the divested southern Georgia operations in fiscal 1995,
gross profit increased 13.4% or $7.2 million and was attributable to the retail
volume growth, improved wholesale gross profit margins and increased revenues
from the sale, service and rental of appliances. Partially offsetting these
positive influences on gross profit were the effects of the second quarter rise
in wholesale propane costs and the decline in sales to lower margin agricultural
customers. On an overall basis, per gallon retail gross profit margins
increased as a greater proportion of the Partnership's sales were made to higher
margin residential and commercial customers.
17
DELIVERY AND BRANCH EXPENSES
Delivery and branch expenses declined 1.3% or $0.5 million to $34.8 million
for fiscal 1996 as compared to $35.2 million for fiscal 1995. This decline was
due to the elimination of $1.6 million of operating costs attributable to the
southern Georgia operations which was partially offset by an increase of $1.1
million or 3.4% in the remaining core operations. The 10.4% volume increase and
the impact on operating costs of the severe winter weather experienced in the
Partnership's Northeast markets were the primary factors for the $1.1 million
increase in operating costs in the core operations. On a per gallon basis,
operating costs in the Midwest and Northeast operations declined 6.4% due to
lower insurance expense, improved operating efficiencies and economies of scale
achieved in connection with growing the Partnership's customer base.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization expense declined $0.3 million to $9.8 million
for fiscal 1996, as compared to $10.1 million for fiscal 1995 primarily due to a
reduction in these expenses due to the divestiture of the southern Georgia
operations.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.4 million to
$6.5 million for fiscal 1996, as compared to $6.1 million for fiscal 1995. This
increase was primarily due to $0.4 million of non-recurring expenses associated
with certain professionals engaged by the partnership to assist management in
analyzing and structuring two significant acquisition candidates.
NET GAIN (LOSS) ON SALES OF ASSETS
Loss on sales of assets declined to $0.3 million for fiscal 1996 from $0.9
million in fiscal 1995. During fiscal 1995 a loss of $0.7 million was recorded
in connection with the sale of the southern Georgia operations.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET
Interest expense, net of interest income, declined 16.7% or $1.4 million to
$7.1 million for fiscal 1996, as compared to $8.5 million for fiscal 1995. This
reduction was primarily due to a decline in the weighted average long-term
borrowing rate and additional income generated on higher cash balances. For
further discussions concerning the Partnership's debt structure. (See Note 10
of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership.)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Income tax expense for fiscal 1996 was approximately $0.1 million. This
expense primarily represents certain state income taxes that the Star Gas Group
was required to pay. Subsequent to December 20, 1995, taxes on income will be
borne by the Partners and not the Partnership, except for income taxes relating
to the Partnership's wholly owned corporate subsidiary which conducts non-
qualifying master limited partnership business.
NET INCOME
Net Income increased $8.8 million to $2.6 million for fiscal 1996 as compared
to a loss of $6.2 million in fiscal 1995. The improvement was attributable to
the 10.4% increase in retail propane volume, the positive impact of divesting
the southern Georgia operations and lower non-cash expenses, including the loss
on sales of assets.
18
EBITDA
EBITDA (defined as operating income (loss) plus depreciation and amortization
less net gain (loss) of sale of businesses and equipment) increased $6.3 million
or 46.7% to $19.9 million for fiscal 1996 as compared to $13.5 million for
fiscal 1995. This improvement in EBITDA was the result of the volume increase
associated with colder temperatures and growth in the Partnership's customer
base due to both acquisitions and internal marketing, partially offset by the
impact of lower per-gallon gross profit margins experienced during the second
quarter of fiscal 1996. For continuing operations, delivery and branch expenses
declined by 6.4%, when measured on a per gallon basis, due to the impact of the
cost reduction programs implemented over the past two years and the increase in
volume. Also contributing to the growth in EBITDA was the divestiture of the
southern Georgia operations, which reduced EBITDA in the prior year by
approximately $0.6 million. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to
net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to
cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations),
but provides additional information for evaluating the Partnership's ability to
make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
For fiscal 1996, net cash flow provided by operating activities of $10.0
million consisted of $2.6 million of net income and $9.8 million of depreciation
and amortization, which was offset by a $2.4 million increase in working capital
and other changes. Inventories increased by $2.3 million due to both an
increase in propane gallons stored and higher per unit propane costs. Net
accounts receivable increased by $0.6 million due to an increase in sales in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1996 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 1995.
Net cash used in investing activities was $7.0 million for 1996, as the proceeds
from the sale of fixed assets of $0.8 million were used to partially fund $2.4
million of acquisitions and $5.3 million of capital expenditures, including $2.3
million of maintenance capital expenditures.
For fiscal 1997, net cash flow provided by operating activities of $19.0
million combined with $0.3 million from the sale of certain fixed assets
amounted to $19.3 million. These funds were utilized in investing activities to
fund $5.3 million of capital expenditures (including $3.1 million of maintenance
capital expenditures), in financing activities to repay net credit facility
borrowings of $2.4 million and to pay Partnership distributions of $11.8
million. As a result of the above activities, cash at September 30, 1997
declined by $0.2 million to $0.9 million, as compared to $1.1 million on hand at
the beginning of the period.
On October 22, 1997, the Partnership completed the Pearl Gas Acquisition. The
total cost of the acquisition Gas was $23.0 million which was paid cash
(including estimated working capital of $1.9 million which is subject to
adjustments) and includes $0.4 million of transactional expenses plus the
issuance of limited and general partner interests in the Partnership, including
147,727 Common Units issued to the General Partner (valued in total as of
acquisition date at $3.5 million). The Partnership funded the cash purchase
price with $2.0 million of available cash and $21.0 million borrowed under the
Partnership's Acquisition Facility. (See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion of this transaction).
Based on its current cash position, bank credit availability and expected net
cash flow from operating activities, the Partnership expects to be able to meet
all of its obligations for fiscal 1998, as well as all of its other current
obligations as they become due. For fiscal 1998, the Partnership anticipates
paying interest on its First Mortgage Notes and acquisition facility of $8.3
million, anticipates paying Limited and General Partner distributions of $12.1
million, and plans to purchase fixed assets of approximately $3.0 million.
19
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Certain statements in this Annual Report that do not reflect historical
information are forward-looking statements. These include statements about
markets in 1998; cost reduction targets; return on capital goals; ongoing and
planned capacity additions and expansions. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking
statements include: supply/demand balance for the Partnership's products,
competitive pricing pressures, weather patterns, and changes in industry laws
and regulations.
20
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
SEE INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE F-1
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
NONE
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT
The General Partner manages and operates the activities of the Partnership.
Unitholders do not directly or indirectly participate in the management or
operation of the Partnership. The General Partner owes a fiduciary duty to the
Unitholders. Notwithstanding any limitation on obligations or duties, the
General Partner will be liable, as the general partner of the Partnership, for
all debts of the Partnership (to the extent not paid by the Partnership), except
to the extent that indebtedness or other obligations incurred by the Partnership
are made specifically non-recourse to the General Partner.
William P. Nicoletti and Elizabeth K. Lanier, who are neither officers nor
employees of the General Partner nor directors, officers or employees of any
affiliate of the General Partner, have been appointed to serve on the Audit
Committee of the General Partner's Board of Directors with the authority to
review, at the request of the General Partner, specific matters as to which the
General Partner believes there may be a conflict of interest in order to
determine if the resolution of such conflict proposed by the General Partner is
fair and reasonable to the Partnership. Any matters approved by the Audit
Committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to the
Partnership, approved by all partners of the Partnership and not a breach by the
General Partner of any duties it may owe the Partnership or the Unitholders. In
addition, the Audit Committee will review external financial reporting of the
Partnership, will recommend engagement of the Partnership's independent
accountants and will review the Partnership's procedures for internal auditing
and the adequacy of the Partnership's internal accounting controls. With respect
to such additional matters, the Audit Committee may act on its own initiative to
question the General Partner and, absent the delegation of specific authority by
the entire Board of Directors, its recommendations with regard thereto will be
advisory.
As is commonly the case with publicly traded limited partnerships, the
Partnership will not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing
or operating the Partnership. The management and workforce of Star Gas and
certain employees of Petro manage and operate the Partnership's business as
officers and employees of the General Partner and its Affiliates. See Item 1 -
Business--Employees.
21
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
directors and executive officers of the General Partner. Executive officers and
directors are elected for one-year terms.
NAME AGE POSITION WITH THE GENERAL PARTNER
- ------------------------------------ ------- -----------------------------------
Irik P. Sevin(1).................... 50 Chairman of the Board of
Directors
William G. Powers, Jr............... 44 President and Chief Executive
Officer
David R. Eastin..................... 39 Vice President -- Operations
Norman L. Bushey.................... 68 Vice President --
Safety/Compliance
Richard F. Ambury................... 40 Vice President-Finance
Audrey L. Sevin..................... 71 Director and Secretary
Thomas J. Edelman................... 46 Director
Paul Biddelman...................... 51 Director
Wolfgang Traber(1).................. 53 Director
William P. Nicoletti(2)............. 52 Director
Elizabeth K. Lanier(2).............. 46 Director
- --------------------
(1) Member of the Compensation Committee
(2) Member of the Audit Committee
IRIK P. SEVIN has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Star Gas since
December 1993. Mr. Sevin has been a Director of Petro since its organization in
October 1979, and Chairman of the Board of Petro since January 1993. Mr. Sevin
has been President of Petro, Inc. since November 1979 and of Petro since 1983.
Mr. Sevin was an associate in the investment banking division of Kuhn Loeb & Co.
and then Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Incorporated from February 1975 to December
1978. Mr. Sevin is a graduate of the Cornell University School of Industrial
and Labor Relations (B.S.), New York University School of Law (J.D.) and the
Columbia University School of Business Administration (M.B.A.).
WILLIAM G. POWERS, JR. has been President of Star Gas since December 1993.
Prior to joining Star Gas, he was employed by Petro from 1984 to 1993 where he
served in various capacities, including Regional Operations Manager and Vice
President of Acquisitions. He has participated in over 90 acquisitions for
Petro. From 1977 to 1983, he was employed by The Augsbury Corporation, a
company engaged in the wholesale and retail distribution of fuel oil and
gasoline throughout New York and New England and served as Vice President of
Marketing and Operations. Mr. Powers is a graduate of the University of Notre
Dame (B.A. 1975) and the University of Vermont Graduate School of Business
(M.B.A. 1984).
DAVID R. EASTIN has served as Vice President of Operations of Star Gas since
September 1995. He joined Star Gas in 1992, and served as a Regional Manager
and as Director of Operations--Eastern Area. Prior to joining Star Gas, he was
employed by Ferrellgas, Inc. (1987 through 1992) and a predecessor company,
Buckeye Gas Products (1980 through 1987), in a variety of operational
capacities. Mr. Eastin is a graduate of the University of Tulsa (B.S. 1980) and
Duquesne University (M.B.A. 1985).
22
RICHARD F. AMBURY has been Vice President of Finance of Star Gas since February
1996. Prior to joining Star Gas, he was employed by Petro from 1983-1996 where
he served in various accounting/finance capacities. From 1979 to 1983, Mr.
Ambury was employed by a predecessor firm of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, a public
accounting firm. Mr. Ambury graduated from Marist College with a degree in
Business Administration in 1979 and has been a Certified Public Accountant since
1981.
NORMAN L. BUSHEY has served as Vice President of Safety/Compliance of Star Gas
since September 1995. Prior thereto he served as the Northeast Area Safety
Manager for Star Gas following Star Gas' acquisition of Maingas, Inc. in 1988.
From 1974 through 1988, Mr. Bushey served as Vice President and General Manager
of Maingas, Inc. From 1953 through 1974, Mr. Bushey was employed by Suburban
Propane.
AUDREY L. SEVIN has been a Director of Star Gas since December 1993 and the
Secretary of Star Gas since June 1994. Mrs. Sevin has been a Director and
Secretary of Petro since its organization in October 1979. Mrs. Sevin was a
Director, executive officer and principal shareholder of A. W. Fuel Co., Inc.
from 1952 until its purchase by Petro in May 1981. Mrs. Sevin is a graduate of
New York University (B.S.).
THOMAS J. EDELMAN has been a Director of Star Gas from December 1993 through
June 1995 and since October 1995. Mr. Edelman has been a Director of Petro
since its organization in October 1979. Mr. Edelman is the Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Office of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation
since its formation in May 1996. Mr. Edelman also serves as Chairman of Lomak
Petroleum, Inc. He co-founded Snyder Oil Corporation and was its President and
a Director from 1981 through February 1997. Prior to 1981, he was a Vice
President of The First Boston Corporation. From 1975 through 1980, Mr. Edelman
was with Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Incorporated. Mr. Edelman received his
Bachelor of Arts Degree from Princeton University and his Masters Degree in
Finance from Harvard University's Graduate School of Business Administration.
Mr. Edelman serves as a Director of Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc.,
Weatherford Enterra, Inc., and serves as a Trustee of The Hotchkiss School.
PAUL BIDDELMAN has been a Director of Star Gas from December 1993 through June
1995 and since October 1995, and a Director of Petro since October 1994. Mr.
Biddelman has been Treasurer of Hanseatic Corporation since April 1992. Mr.
Biddelman is also a Director of Celadon Group, Inc., Electronic Retailing
Systems International, Inc., Insituform Technologies, Inc. and Premier Parks,
Inc.
WOLFGANG TRABER has been a Director of Star Gas from December 1993 through June
1995 and since October 1995. Mr. Traber has been a Director of Petro since its
organization in October 1979. Mr. Traber is Chairman of the Board of Hanseatic
Corporation, a private investment corporation in New York, New York. Mr. Traber
is a Director of Deltec Asset Management Corporation, Blue Ridge Real Estate
Company, Hellespont Tankers Ltd. and M.M. Warburg & CO.
WILLIAM P. NICOLETTI has been a Director of Star Gas since November 1995. Since
1991, Mr. Nicoletti has been Managing Director of Nicoletti & Company Inc., a
private investment bank servicing clients in energy-related industries. From
1988 through 1990, he was a Managing Director and head of the Energy and Natural
Resources Group of PaineWebber Incorporated. From 1969 through 1987, he was
with E.F. Hutton & Company Inc., where from 1980 through 1987 he was a Senior
Vice President and head of the Energy and Natural Resources Group. He is also
Chairman of the Board of Amerac Energy Corporation and a Director of Domain
Energy Corporation and StatesRail, Inc.
23
ELIZABETH K. LANIER has been a Director of Star Gas since November 1995. Since
June 1996, Ms. Lanier has been Vice President and Chief of Staff for Cinergy
Corp. Before joining Cinergy, Ms. Lanier was a partner in the law firm of Frost
& Jacobs in Cincinnati Ohio. From 1976 through 1982, she was associated with
Davis Polk & Wardwell in New York, New York. Ms. Lanier is a graduate of Smith
College (B.A.) and the Columbia University School of Law (J.D.).
AUDREY SEVIN is the mother of Irik P. Sevin. There are no other familial
relationships between any of the directors and executive officers.
On November 7, 1997, the General Partner announced that William G. Powers,
Jr., the President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, had
been appointed as the President of Petro, effective as of December 1, 1997 and
that Joseph P. Cavanaugh, Senior Vice President of Petro, will succeed Mr.
Powers as President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner. The
General Partner also announced that Mr. Powers will become a Director of the
General Partner and a member of the newly organized management committee of
the Board of Directors of the General Partner (consisting of Mr. Powers and
Irik P. Sevin, Chairman of the Board) effective as of December 1, 1997.
Mr. Cavanaugh, 60, has been Senior Vice President-Safety and Compliance of
Petro since January 1993. From October 1985 to January 1993, Mr. Cavanaugh was
Vice President of Petro. Mr. Cavanaugh was Controller of Petro, Inc. from 1973
to 1985 and of Petro from its organization in 1983 until 1994. Mr. Cavanaugh has
also taken an active role in assisting the Partnership's management with the
development of safety/compliance programs, assisting with acquisitions and their
subsequent integration into the Partnership and with the Partnership's risk
management efforts, since Petro's initial involvement with the Star Gas Group in
1993. Mr. Cavanaugh is a graduate of Iona College (B.B.A.) and Pace University
(M.S. in Taxation).
MEETINGS AND COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
During fiscal 1997, the Board of Directors met six times, including one via
telephonic conference. All Directors attended each meeting except for Messrs.
Sevin and Edelman who attended six meetings and Mr. Traber who attended five
meetings. Star Gas pays each director including the chairman an annual fee of
$17,500. Members of the audit committee receive an additional $5,000 per annum.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company's Board of Directors has an Audit Committee and a Compensation
Committee. The members of each committee are appointed by the Board of
Directors for a one year term and until their respective successors are elected.
In connection with the Partnership's decision to explore strategic
alternatives to maximize shareholder value, the board of directors appointed a
special committee to review the proposals received by Morgan Stanley & Co.,
Incorporated. Ms. Lanier and Mr. Nicoletti received $20,000 each for
compensation in serving on this committee.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The duties of the Audit Committee are described above under "Partnership
Management".
The members of the Audit Committee are Elizabeth K. Lanier and William P.
Nicoletti. Members of the Audit Committee may not be employees of the Company.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The duties of the Compensation Committee are (i) to determine the annual
salary, bonus and other benefits, direct and indirect, of any and all named
executive officers (as defined under Regulation S-K promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission), (ii) to review and recommend to the full
Board any and all matters related to benefit plans covering the foregoing
officers and any other employees in the event such matters are appropriate for
stockholder approval, and (iii) to administer the Partnership's Unit Option Plan
as the Option Committee thereunder. The members of the Compensation Committee
are Wolfgang Traber and Irik P. Sevin.
REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
The General Partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation
in connection with its management of the Partnership. The General Partner is
reimbursed at cost for all expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership,
including the costs of compensation described herein properly allocable to the
Partnership, and all other expenses necessary or appropriate to the conduct of
the business of, and allocable to, the Partnership.
24
The Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner shall determine
the expenses that are allocable to the Partnership in any reasonable manner
determined by the General Partner in its sole discretion. Affiliates of the
General Partner, including Petro, perform certain management and acquisition
services for the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership. Such affiliates
do not receive a fee for such services, but are reimbursed for all direct and
indirect expenses incurred in connection therewith.
In addition, the General Partner owns 2,396,078 subordinated units and
147,727 common units of the Partnership and is entitled to receive distributions
on such Units, and the General Partner is entitled to incentive distributions in
respect of its general partner interest.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the annual salary, bonuses and all other
compensation awards and payouts to the President and Chief Executive Officer and
to certain named executive officers of the General Partner for services rendered
to Star Gas and its subsidiaries during the fiscal years ended September 30,
1997, 1996 and 1995.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation
------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER
ANNUAL
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION
- ------------------------------------------ ---- ------ ----- ------------
William G. Powers, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer 1997 $225,000 $100,000 $20,803 (1)
1996 $225,000 $100,000 $21,071 (1)
1995 $219,231 $ 75,000 $18,094 (1)
Richard F. Ambury
Vice President - Finance 1997 $143,000 $35,750 $20,408 (1)
1996 $ 99,667(4) $25,000 --
David R. Eastin
Vice President - Operations 1997 $120,000 $30,000 $ 3,214 (2)
1996 $106,826 $26,707 $ 9,292 (3)
1995 $ 89,896 $10,000 --
Norman L. Bushey
Vice President - Safety/Compliance 1997 $70,000 $17,500 $ 2,625 (2)
1996 $63,000 $15,750 $ 1,900 (2)
- ------------------------------
(1) Represents amounts paid in lieu of contribution under Star Gas' 401(k) plan.
(2) Represents matching contributions paid to Star Gas' 401(k) plan.
(3) Represents a $7,570 relocation allowance and Star Gas' matching contribution
to Mr. Eastin's 401(k) retirement plan of $1,722.
(4) Mr. Ambury joined Star Gas on February 1, 1996.
25
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
NUMBER OF UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 VALUE OF IN THE MONEY OPTIONS
NAME Exercisable(E)/Unexercisable(U) AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997(1)
- --------------------------------- -------------------------------- -----------------------------
William G. Powers, Jr. 30,000 (U) $3,750
David R. Eastin 10,000 (U) $1,250
- --------------------------------
(1) Values are calculated by deducting the exercise price from the fair market
value of the common units as of September 30, 1997.
OPTIONS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
None.
UNIT OPTION PLAN
In December 1995, the General Partner adopted the 1995 Star Gas Corporation
Unit Option Plan (the "Unit Option Plan"), which currently authorizes the
issuance of options (the "Unit Options") and Unit Appreciation Rights ("UARS")
covering up to 300,000 Subordinated Units to certain officers and employees of
the General Partner. A total of 40,000 options were granted to key executives
in December 1995. The Unit Options have the following characteristics: 1)
exercise price of $22 per unit, which is an estimate of the fair market value of
the Subordinated Units at the time of grant, 2) vest over five year period, 3)
exercisable after January 12, 2001, assuming the lapse of the subordination
period and 4) expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Upon
conversion of the Subordinated Units held by the General Partner and its
affiliates, the Unit Options granted will convert to Common Unit Options.
401(K) PLAN
The Star Gas Corporation Employee Savings Plan is a voluntary defined
contribution plan covering non-union and union employees who have attained the
age of 21 and who have completed one year of service. Participant's in the plan
may elect to contribute a sum not to exceed 15% of a participant's compensation.
For non-union employees, the Company contributes a matching amount equaling the
participant's contribution not to exceed 3% of the participant's compensation.
In addition, the plan allows the Company to contribute an additional
discretionary amount which will be allocated to each participant based on such
participant's compensation as a percentage of total compensation of all
participant's.
26
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON AND SUBORDINATED UNITS
The following table set forth certain information as of November 4, 1997
regarding the beneficial ownership of (i) the Common and Subordinated Units of
the Partnership by certain beneficial owners and all directors of the General
Partner, each of the named executive officers and all directors and executive
officers as a group. The General Partner knows of no person beneficially owning
more than 5% of the Common Units.
UNITS
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIALLY PERCENT OF
TITLE OF CLASS BENEFICIAL OWNER Owned(1) Class
- -------------- --------------------- ------------- -----------
Common Units Richard F. Ambury(1) 525 --
Common Units Star Gas Corporation(1) 147,727 4.8%
Subordinated Units Star Gas Corporation(1) 2,396,078 100.0%
- ---------
(1) The address of such person is care of the Partnership at 2187 Atlantic
Street, Stamford, CT 06902.
27
OWNERSHIP OF PETRO COMMON STOCK BY THE DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE
GENERAL PARTNER
The table below sets forth as of November 1, 1997, the beneficial ownership
of Petro Common Stock by each director and each named executive officer of the
General Partner, as well as the directors and all of the executive officers of
the General Partner as a group. The total shares beneficially owned by the
directors and executive officers as a group, including 393,518 shares of Class A
Common Stock and 70,379 shares of Class C Common Stock subject to options
exercisable within the next 60 days, represent 22.03% of Petro's outstanding
Class A Common Stock and 55.67% of Petro's outstanding Class C Common Stock.
Each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote and each share of
Class C Common Stock is entitled to 10 votes, but otherwise the two Classes have
the same rights. Petro's Class A Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ National
Market (Symbol: HEAT).
Number of Shares (1) Percent of Total Percent of
---------------------------- ------------------- Total Voting
Name Class A Class C Class A Class C Power (2)
- ---------------------------------- ------------ ---------- ------- ------- ------------
Audrey L. Sevin (3)................ 1,888,624 477,716 7.95% 18.39% 13.41%
Irik P. Sevin (3).................. 1,167,847(4) 272,020(4) 4.84% 10.20% 7.65%
Wolfgang Traber (5)................ 1,652,203(6) 606,472(7) 6.96% 23.35% 15.52%
Thomas J. Edelman (3).............. 593,049(8) 129,019 2.50% 4.97% 3.79%
Paul Biddelman (5)................. 1,654,589(6) 597,424 6.97% 23.00% 15.34%
William G. Powers, Jr. (3) -- -- -- -- --
Richard F. Ambury (3).............. 12,345(9) -- 0.05% -- 0.02%
David R. Eastin (3) -- -- -- -- --
Norman L. Bushey (3) -- -- -- -- --
Elizabeth K. Lanier (10) -- -- -- -- --
William P. Nicoletti (11) -- -- -- -- --
All officers and directors as a
group (11 persons)................ 5,316,454 1,485,227 22.03% 55.67% 39.86%
- --------------------------
(1) For purposes of this table, a person or group is deemed to have "beneficial
ownership" of any shares which such person has the right to acquire within
60 days after November 1, 1997. For purposes of calculating the percentage
of outstanding shares held by each person named above, any shares which
such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after November 1, 1997
are deemed to be outstanding, but not for the purpose of calculating the
percentage ownership of any other person.
(2) Total voting power means the total voting power of all shares of Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock. This column reflects the percentage
of total voting power represented by all shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock held by the named persons.
(3) The address of such person is c/o the Partnership at 2187 Atlantic Street,
Stamford, CT 06902.
(4) Includes options to purchase 381,518 shares of Class A Common Stock and
70,379 shares of Class C Common Stock.
(5) The address of such person is 450 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022.
(6) Includes 1,652,203 shares held by Hanseatic Americas LDC, a Bahamian
limited duration company in which the sole managing member is Hansabel
Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company in which the sole
managing member is Hanseatic Corporation, a New York corporation
("Hanseatic"). Messrs. Traber and Biddelman are executive officers of
Hanseatic and Mr. Traber holds in excess of a majority of the shares of
capital stock of Hanseatic.
(7) Includes 298,717 shares owned by each of Hanseatic and Tortosa
Vermogensverwaltungsgesellschaft gmbh ("Tortosa"), a German corporation
owned and controlled by Hubertus Langen, and as to which Hanseatic and
Tortosa each hold shared voting power.
(8) Includes 76,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned by Mr. Edelman's wife
and minor children.
(9) Includes options to purchase 12,000 shares of Class A Common Stock.
(10) The address of such person is 221 E. Fourth St., 30th Fl., Cincinnati, OH
45202.
(11) The address of such person is 1155 Avenue of the Americas, 29th Fl., New
York, NY 10036.
28
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires the General
Partner's officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a
registered class of the Partnership's equity securities, to file reports of
beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Officers, directors and greater than 10 percent
unitholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the General Partner with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by the
General Partner, or written representations from certain reporting persons that
no Form 5's were required for those persons, the General Partner believes that
during fiscal year 1997 all filing requirements applicable to its officers,
directors, and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners were met in a timely
manner.
29
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Partnership and the General Partner have certain ongoing relationships
with Petro and its affiliates. Affiliates of the General Partner, including
Petro, perform certain administrative services for the General Partner on behalf
of the Partnership. Such affiliates do not receive a fee for such services, but
are reimbursed for all direct and indirect expenses incurred in connection
therewith.
For the period October 1, 1996 through September 30, 1997, the Partnership
reimbursed the General Partner and Petro $17.1 million representing salary,
payroll tax and other compensation to the employees of the General Partner,
including $0.2 million paid to Petro for corporate services such as compliance,
supply and finance. In addition, the Partnership has reimbursed Petro for $0.9
million relating to the Partnership's share of the costs incurred by Petro in
conducting the operations of a certain shared branch location which includes
managerial services.
Petro and the General Partner entered into a Management Services Agreement on
December 21, 1993 pursuant to which Petro agreed to provide executive, financial
and managerial oversight services to the General Partner for a period of ten
years. Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, Petro was entitled to a
yearly management fee of $500,000, plus a bonus under certain circumstances.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 1995, the General Partner paid fees of
$500,000 pursuant to the Management Services Agreement. The Management Services
Agreement was terminated in December 1995.
Prior to Petro's acquisition of Star Gas, Star Gas engaged Nicoletti &
Company Inc., an investment banking firm owned by William P. Nicoletti, who is
now a Director of the General Partner, to perform certain investment banking
services for Star Gas. Pursuant to such engagement, Star Gas paid Nicoletti &
Company Inc. fees of $81,600, $521,500 and $40,000 for services rendered during
1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. In 1995, Star Gas paid Nicoletti & Company
Inc. $20,000 in advisory fees in connection with a proposed acquisition. In
1997, Star Gas paid Mr. Nicoletti $20,000 for serving on the Board of Directors
Special Committee which explored the possible sale or merger of the Partnership.
Elizabeth K. Lanier, a Director of the General Partner, was a partner in the
law firm of Frost & Jacobs, in Cincinnati, Ohio until June 1996. Frost & Jacobs
has acted as counsel to Star Gas in connection with certain litigation matters.
In 1997, Star Gas paid Ms. Lanier $20,000 for serving on the Board of Directors
Special Committee which explored the possible sale or merger of the Partnership.
In 1993 Star Gas paid an aggregate of $50,000 in advisory fees to Warwick
Energy Advisors, Inc. (Warwick), a company controlled by Thomas Edelman, now a
Director of the General Partner and Petro. In 1993, Petro paid Warwick and Mr.
Edelman an aggregate of $211,500 in advisory fees in connection with Petro's
acquisition of Star Gas. In 1994, Petro paid Mr. Edelman an additional $248,500
in such fees. In 1995, Petro paid Mr. Edelman $20,000 in advisory fees in
connection with a proposed acquisition by Star Gas.
For a discussion of certain indebtedness of the General Partner to Petro, see
Note 10 of the notes to the financial statements.
30
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
See "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedule" set forth on page F-1.
2. Financial Statement Schedule.
See "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedule" set forth on page F-1.
3. Exhibits.
See "Index to Exhibits" set forth on page 31.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
The Partnership did not file a Form 8-K during the quarter
ended September 30, 1997.
31
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
DESCRIPTION
-----------
Exhibit
Number Description
------- ---------------------------------------------------
(1) 3.1 Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Star
Gas Partners, L.P. (included as Appendix A to
the Prospectus)
(1) 3.2 Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Star Gas Propane, L.P.
(1) 10.1 Form of Credit Agreement among Star Gas Propane,
L.P. and certain banks
(1) 10.2 Form of Conveyance and Contribution Agreement
among Star Gas Corporation, the Partnership and
the Operating Partnership
(1) 10.3 Form of First Mortgage Note Agreement among
certain insurance companies, Star Gas
Corporation and Star Gas Propane, L.P.
(1) 10.4 Intercompany Debt
(1) 10.5 Form of Non-competition Agreement between Petro
and the Partnership
(1) 10.6 Form of Star Gas Corporation 1995 Unit Option
Plan
(1) 10.7 Amoco Supply Contract
(1) 21 Subsidiaries of the registrant
(2) 27 Financial data schedule
(3) 99.1 Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 20, 1997
(3) 99.2 Conveyance and Contribution Agreement
(3) 99.3 Second Amendment dated October 21, 1997 to the Bank
Credit Agreement
___________________
(1) Incorporated by reference to the same Exhibit to Registrant's Statement
on Form S-1, File No. 33-98496, filed with the Commission on December
13, 1995.
(2) Filed herein.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the same Exhibit to Registrants Statement
on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 1997.
32
SIGNATURE
---------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized:
Star Gas Partners, L.P.
By: Star Gas Corporation (General Partner)
William G. Powers, Jr.
----------------------
By: /s/ William G. Powers, Jr.
William G. Powers, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the date
indicated:
Signature Title Date
- --------- ----- ----
/s/ William G. Powers, Jr. President November 24, 1997
---------------------- Star Gas Corporation
William G. Powers, Jr. Principal Executive
Officer)
/s/ Richard F. Ambury Vice President - Finance November 24, 1997
----------------- Star Gas Corporation
Richard F. Ambury (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
/s/ Irik P. Sevin Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
Irik P. Sevin
/s/ Audrey L. Sevin Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
Audrey L. Sevin
/s/ William P. Nicoletti Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
William P. Nicoletti
/s/ Elizabeth K. Lanier Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
Elizabeth K. Lanier
/s/ Paul Biddelman Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
Paul Biddelman
/s/ Thomas J. Edelman Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
Thomas J. Edelman
/s/ Wolfgang Traber Director November 24, 1997
-------------------- Star Gas Corporation
Wolfgang Traber
33
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
PAGE
----
PART II FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 8 - Financial Statements
Star Gas Partners, L.P. and Subsidiary and the Star Gas
-------------------------------------------------------
Group(Predecessor)
------------------
Independent Auditors' Report ................................. F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1996
and 1997...................................................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
September 30, 1995 (Predecessor), and from October 1, 1995
through December 20, 1995 (Predecessor), December 20, 1995
through September 30, 1996, and the year ended September 30,
1997.......................................................... F-4
Consolidated Statement of Partners' Capital for the period
December 20, 1995 through September 30, 1996 and the year
ended September 30, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement of
Predecessor's Equity for year ended September 30, 1995
(Predecessor) and the period October 1, 1995 through December 20,
1995 (Predecessor)............................................ F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended
September 30, 1995 (Predecessor), and from October 1, 1995
through December 20, 1995 (Predecessor), December 20, 1995
through September 30, 1996, and the year ended September 30,
1997 ......................................................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .................. F-7 -- F-18
Schedule for the years ended September 30, 1995, 1996 and 1997
II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts ................. F-19
All other schedules are omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is shown in the
consolidated financial statements or the notes therein.
F-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners of Star Gas Partners, L.P.:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Star Gas
Partners, L.P. and Subsidiary and its Predecessor as listed in the
accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement
schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and Subsidiary and its Predecessor as of
September 30, 1996 and 1997 and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
Stamford, Connecticut KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
November 7, 1997
F-2
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 1997
---- ----
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,106 $ 889
Receivables, net of allowance of $291 and
$273, respectively 7,226 5,720
Inventories 8,494 6,597
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,016 959
-------- --------
Total current assets 17,842 14,165
Property and equipment, net 97,733 95,282
Intangibles and other assets, net 41,338 38,022
-------- --------
Total assets $156,913 $147,469
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current Liabilities:
Bank credit facility borrowings $ 2,350 $ --
Accounts payable 1,991 3,178
Accrued expenses 2,757 3,004
Accrued interest 340 321
Customer credit balances 2,858 4,343
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 10,296 10,846
-------- --------
Long-term debt 85,000 85,000
Other long-term liabilities 219 45
Partners' Capital:
Common unitholders 52,821 47,573
Subordinated unitholder 8,410 4,034
General partner 167 (29)
-------- --------
Total Partners' Capital 61,398 51,578
-------- --------
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $156,913 $147,469
======== ========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT AMOUNTS)
YEAR OCTOBER 1, 1995 DECEMBER 20, OCTOBER 1, 1995
ENDED THROUGH 1995 THROUGH
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 20, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, YEAR ENDED
1995 1995 SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 SEPTEMBER 30,
(Predecessor) (Predecessor) 1996 (Combined) 1997
----------------- ------------------- --------------- ----------------- ----------------
Sales $104,550 $28,159 $91,475 $119,634 $135,159
Cost of sales 49,660 12,808 45,749 58,557 72,211
-------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Gross profit 54,890 15,351 45,726 61,077 62,948
Delivery and branch 35,222 7,729 27,021 34,750 36,427
Depreciation and
amortization 10,073 2,177 7,631 9,808 10,405
General and
administrative 6,127 1,349 5,108 6,457 6,818
Net (loss) on sales of
assets (913) (113) (147) (260) (295)
-------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income 2,555 3,983 5,819 9,802 9,003
Interest expense, net 8,549 1,922 5,202 7,124 6,966
-------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
income taxes (5,994) 2,061 617 2,678 2,037
Income tax expense 175 60 25 85 25
-------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) $ (6,169) $ 2,001 $ 592 $ 2,593 $ 2,012
======== ======= ======= ======== ========
General Partner's
interest in net income $ 12 $ $40
------- --------
Limited Partners'
interest in net income $ 580 $ 1,972
======= ========
Net Income per Limited
Partner unit $ 0.11 $ 0.37
======= ========
Weighted average number
of Limited Partner
units outstanding 5,271 5,271
======= ========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL AND PREDECESSOR EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)
PREDECESSOR'S EQUITY
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 1995
THROUGH DECEMBER 20, 1995
8% Total
Cumulative 12.5% Capital in Predecessor's
Preferred Preferred Excess of Equity
Stock Stock Par Value Deficit (Deficiency)
--------- --------- ---------- ------- -----------
Balance as of September 30, 1994 $ 500 $ -- $108,336 $(64,508) $44,328
Conversion of preferred stock (266) 319 (53) -- --
Redemption of preferred stock (49) -- (5,042) -- (5,091)
Stock dividends declared 4 -- 368 (732) (360)
Cash dividends preferred stock -- -- -- (5,287) (5,287)
Purchase accounting adjustment -- -- (51,906) 68,790 16,884
Net loss -- -- -- (6,169) (6,169)
----- ---- -------- -------- -------
Balance as of September 30, 1995 189 319 51,703 (7,906) 44,305
Dividends (21,309) (21,309)
Additional capital contribution -- -- 4,184 -- 4,184
Net income -- -- --