Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)
          x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

OR

          o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to                 .

Commission file number 0-29752

LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
     
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  33-0811062
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
10307 Pacific Center Court, San Diego, CA
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  92121
(Zip Code)

(858) 882-6000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.0001 par value

(Title of Class)

Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     YES x     NO o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

      As of March 27, 2002, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $299,458,317, based on the closing price of Leap’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market on March 27, 2002, of $8.34 per share.

      As of March 27, 2002, 37,316,663 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share, were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

      Information required to be furnished pursuant to Part III of this Form 10-K will be set forth in, and is incorporated by reference to, the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 15, 2002, which definitive Proxy Statement will be filed by the Registrant not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1.Business
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
EXHIBIT 10.16.3
EXHIBIT 10.17.3
EXHIBIT 10.17.4
EXHIBIT 10.18.2
EXHIBIT 10.18.3
EXHIBIT 10.18.4
EXHIBIT 10.18.5
EXHIBIT 10.19.4
EXHIBIT 10.19.5
EXHIBIT 10.32
EXHIBIT 10.34
EXHIBIT 21.1
EXHIBIT 23.1


Table of Contents

LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

For the Year Ended December 31, 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

             
Page

PART 1
Item 1.
  Business     1  
Item 2.
  Properties     26  
Item 3.
  Legal Proceedings     26  
Item 4.
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     26  
PART II
Item 5.
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     27  
Item 6.
  Selected Financial Data     28  
Item 7.
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     30  
Item 7A.
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     51  
Item 8.
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     53  
Item 9.
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     98  
PART III
Item 10.
  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant     98  
Item 11.
  Executive Compensation     98  
Item 12.
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     98  
Item 13.
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     98  
PART IV
Item 14.
  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K     98  

i


Table of Contents

PART I

Forward-Looking Statements; Cautionary Statement

      Except for the historical information contained herein, this document contains forward-looking statements reflecting management’s current forecast of certain aspects of Leap’s future. Some forward-looking statements can be identified by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “think,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “expect,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions contained in this report. It is based on current information, which Leap has assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and even abrupt changes. Our actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include but are not limited to: changes in the economic conditions of the various markets our subsidiaries serve which could adversely affect the market for wireless services; our ability to access capital markets; a failure to meet the operational, financial or other covenants contained in our credit facilities; a deterioration of our relationships with our equipment vendors and related lenders, including our failure to obtain amendments to our credit facilities that we may request from time to time; a failure of network systems to perform according to expectations; the effect of competition; the acceptance of our product offering by our target customers; our ability to retain customers; our ability to maintain our cost, market penetration and pricing structure in the face of competition; technological challenges in developing wireless information services and customer acceptance of such services if developed; our ability to integrate the businesses and technologies we acquire; rulings by courts or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adversely affecting our rights to own and/or operate certain wireless licenses or impacting our rights and obligations to acquire the licenses on which we were the winning bidder in the FCC’s broadband PCS auction completed in January 2001 (Auction 35); the impacts on the global and domestic economies and the financial markets of recent terrorist activities, the ensuing declaration of war on terrorism and the continued threat of terrorist activity and other acts of war or hostility; and other factors detailed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this report and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings filed subsequent to this report. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of these risk factors. Investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events or developments.

Item 1. Business

      The words “Leap,” “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” refer to Leap Wireless International, Inc. and, unless the context otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise specified, information relating to population and potential customers is based on 2001 population estimates provided by Easy Analytic Software Incorporated.

Overview

      Leap is a wireless communications carrier that is providing innovative, affordable, simple wireless services designed to accelerate the transformation of wireless service into a mass consumer product. We generally seek to address a much broader population segment than traditional wireless providers have addressed to date. In the U.S., we are offering wireless service under the brand “Cricket®.” Our innovative Cricket strategy is designed to extend the benefits of mobility to the mass market by offering wireless service that is as simple to understand and use as, and is a mobile alternative to traditional landline service. In each of our markets, we are deploying 100% digital, Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA, networks that we believe provide higher capacity and more efficient deployment of capital than competing technologies. This, when combined with our efforts to streamline operation and distribution systems, allows us to be a low-cost provider of wireless services in each of our markets.

      Cricket service allows customers to make and receive virtually unlimited calls within a local calling area for a low, flat monthly rate compared with traditional wireless services. Cricket customers pay in advance each month’s service from a simple, straightforward bill. We offer Cricket service without a long-term contract, and

1


Table of Contents

because service is paid in advance, we currently require no credit check. The simplicity of the Cricket service allows us to sustain lower operating costs per minute of use compared to traditional wireless providers. Our networks are designed and built to provide coverage in the local calling area where our target customers live, work and play. As a result, we believe that our network operating costs are less per minute of use than those of traditional wireless providers.

      As of March 1, 2002, we had launched Cricket service in 40 markets covering a total population of approximately 25.2 million potential customers. These markets are located in 48 “basic trading areas,” or “BTAs” and make up all the markets that we refer to as our “40 Market Plan.” As of December 31, 2001, we had approximately 1,119,000 million Cricket customers in our markets across the U.S. To date we have acquired wireless licenses covering approximately 53.4 million potential customers in 33 states. In addition, we were the winning bidder for wireless licenses covering approximately 23.8 million potential customers in an FCC auction that was completed in January 2001, referred to as Auction 35. NextWave Telecom, Inc., the original holder of these licenses, is a party to litigation against the federal government challenging the validity of Auction 35 and has prevailed on certain of its claims in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In response to a petition for certiorari by the FCC, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the case. The grant to us of these Auction 35 wireless licenses has been substantially delayed by the NextWave litigation. If these Auction 35 wireless licenses are ultimately granted to us, we will likely be required to make full payment for them of $350.1 million (less any amounts then on deposit with the FCC) within 10 business days of a public notice issued by the FCC establishing a payment deadline. We cannot predict what effect any challenges before the FCC or in court to the reauction generally, or the grant of these wireless licenses to us specifically, will have on us. Over time, as capital resources permit, we plan to continue to grow our business prudently on a market by market basis as we obtain additional financial resources to support the further expansion of our business. However, we have agreed in our vendor credit agreements not to build out or launch any new markets until after June 30, 2003, other than markets included in our 40 Market Plan. We also intend to continue pursuing opportunities to maximize the value of our current wireless license portfolio. We currently plan to expand our wireless service offerings to include information services designed to appeal to a broad segment of the population. We believe that wireless information services, like our innovative Cricket service, need to be simple, easy to use and affordable.

      In Mexico, we were a founding shareholder and have made investments in and have loans to Pegaso Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V. totaling $120.5 million. Pegaso is a company that is providing a wireless service in Mexico that is more traditional than our Cricket service. Pegaso holds wireless licenses covering all of Mexico, representing approximately 99 million potential customers. At the end of December 2001, Pegaso had approximately 804,000 customers. We currently own 20.1% of the outstanding capital stock of Pegaso. For a discussion of Pegaso and its business, see further discussion below under “International Investments — Pegaso.”

Business Strategy

      Our business strategy is to bring innovative wireless communications products and services to markets with strong growth potential. Key elements of this strategy include:

  •  Enhancing the Mass Market Appeal of Wireless Service. We are working to remove the price and complexity barriers that we believe have prevented many potential customers from using wireless service. We believe that large segments of the population do not use wireless service because they view wireless service as an expensive luxury item, believe they cannot control the cost of service, or find existing service plans too confusing. Our service plans are designed to offer appealing value in simple formats that customers can understand and budget for.
 
  •  Offering an Appealing Value Proposition. We strive to provide service offerings that combine high quality and advanced features with simplicity and attractive pricing to create a “high value/ reasonable price” proposition and broaden the market for wireless services. In the U.S., we offer the Cricket service plan at a flat rate, paid in advance each month that is a mobile alternative to traditional landline service.

2


Table of Contents

  •  Controlling and Minimizing Costs. To become one of the lowest-cost providers in the wireless industry, we are designing high-quality networks to minimize our capital costs and streamlining marketing, distribution and back-office procedures.
 
  •  Leveraging CDMA Technology. We are deploying state-of-the-art CDMA networks that are designed to provide higher capacity at a lower capital cost which can be easily upgraded to support enhanced capacity. We believe this enables us to operate superior networks that support rapid customer growth and high usage. In addition, we believe our CDMA networks will provide a better platform to expand into other wireless information services based on advances in second and third generation digital technology in the future.
 
  •  Expanding Our Cricket Service Through Acquisitions of Domestic Licenses and Buildout of Additional Networks. Over time, as capital resources permit, we intend to expand the Cricket service to selected metropolitan areas in the U.S. through the acquisition of additional wireless licenses and the buildout of networks for our wireless licenses. However, we have agreed in our vendor credit agreements not to build out or launch any new markets until after June 30, 2003, other than markets included in our 40 Market Plan.
 
  •  Expanding Our Service Offerings to Include Wireless Information Services. As capital resources permit, we plan to expand our service offerings to include wireless information services designed to appeal to a broad segment of the population and further transform the nature of wireless communications for our customers. We believe that wireless information services, like our innovative Cricket service, need to be simple, easy to use and affordable for all consumers.
 
  •  Investing Selectively in Foreign Ventures. While we expect our emphasis for the next few years to be on our U.S.-based operations, if presented with attractive opportunities, and as capital resources permit, we may invest in international markets where we believe the combination of unfulfilled demand and our attractive wireless service offerings can fuel rapid growth.

U.S. Business

Cricket

      General. In the U.S., our business strategy is different from existing models used by typical cellular or PCS wireless providers. Most of these providers offer consumers a complex array of rate plans that include additional charges for minutes above a set maximum, as well as fees for roaming, that may result in monthly service charges that are higher than expected. Approximately 55% of the U.S. population currently does not subscribe to wireless service, and we believe that many of these potential customers perceive wireless service as too expensive and complicated. The Cricket service is based on our vision that the mass market wants wireless service to be predictable, affordable and as simple to understand and use as traditional landline telephone service, but with the benefits of mobility.

      We have designed the Cricket service to appeal to consumers who make the majority of their calls from within the local areas in which they live, work and play. The Cricket service allows customers to make and receive virtually unlimited calls within a local calling area for an affordable, flat monthly rate that is a mobile alternative to landline service. Cricket customers pay for each month’s service in advance from a simple, straightforward bill. We offer Cricket service without a long-term contract and because Cricket service is paid in advance, we currently require no credit check. In addition to local calling, directory assistance calls and long distance minutes can be purchased in advance and direct dialed without the use of a special code or card.

      We expect Cricket’s simple pricing to attract customers who have been apprehensive about the more complicated and unpredictable pricing plans offered by traditional wireless providers. The simplicity of the Cricket service also allows us to reduce costs by eliminating costly features of wireless services, such as expansive geographic coverage and roaming, that our target customers are likely to use infrequently. We are therefore able to offer our customers a high quality mobile service at an affordable price.

3


Table of Contents

      Strategy. We believe that the Cricket service offering has begun to help transform wireless phone service from a luxury product into a mass consumer product. The Cricket strategy is to provide digital wireless service to the mass market with a simple, easy to understand approach. As a part of the Cricket strategy, we intend to:

  •  attract new customers more quickly than traditional wireless providers that offer complex pricing plans with peak/off-peak rates, roaming charges and expensive “extra” minutes;
 
  •  maintain lower customer acquisition costs by offering one simple service plan with a limited choice of handsets, and by distributing our product through company stores and multiple third-party retail stores where the mass market shops;
 
  •  sustain lower operating costs per customer compared to traditional wireless providers through reduced network operation costs, streamlined billing procedures, lower customer care expenses, lower credit investigation costs and reduced bad debt; and
 
  •  deploy our capital more efficiently by building our networks to cover only the urban and suburban areas of our markets where most of our potential customers live, work and play, while avoiding rural areas and corridors between distant markets.

      Market Opportunity. Wireless penetration was approximately 45% in the U.S. at the end of December 2001. Traditional wireless companies have generally focused their U.S. marketing on highly mobile customers, including business users, who are likely to generate the highest revenues. Their customers are typically offered multiple service plans with prices based on the customer’s minutes of use during the billing period. Leap believes that the numerous plans offered by wireless companies have tended to confuse many potential customers. Market research indicates that many people are interested in a wireless product but are concerned about the cost, complexity and unpredictability of traditional wireless pricing plans.

      Sales and Distribution. We differentiate the Cricket service concept and expect to continue to increase our market share through promoting a simplified buying process and focusing marketing efforts on potential customers in the communities covered by our local wireless networks. The Cricket approach is to rapidly penetrate our target markets while minimizing our sales and marketing expenses, primarily by keeping the customer’s purchase decision simple, thus minimizing the need for sales agent commissions and associated residuals.

      The Cricket service and wireless handsets are sold through three main channels:

  •  Cricket retail stores in high-traffic locations and Cricket kiosks located in major shopping malls;
 
  •  the local stores of national retail chains; and
 
  •  independent third-party dealers who are well positioned through their principal lines of business to reach our target potential customers, such as furniture and appliance retailers and rental companies, convenience stores and other local service businesses.

      The Cricket service plan is designed so that a potential customer can make a purchase decision with little or no sales assistance. Customers can read about the Cricket service on the retail package for our wireless handsets and learn virtually all they need to know about the service without consulting a complicated plan summary or a specialized sales person. We simplify the customer’s decision process by limiting the number of Cricket handset models available. We believe the sales costs for the Cricket service are lower than traditional wireless providers because of this streamlined sales approach.

      We currently offer handsets in a limited number of price points, priced with the first month’s Cricket service included. We expect to continue to charge customers a partially subsidized price for handsets to ensure that they have made an investment in the equipment related to our wireless service and provide a moderate economic incentive to maintain the Cricket service rather than switching to the services of a competitor. We do not require customers to sign a long-term contract, unlike traditional wireless providers that require long-term commitments.

4


Table of Contents

      We combine mass marketing strategies and tactics to build awareness of the Cricket service concept and brand name within the communities we service. Because the Cricket service is offered in distinct “island” markets, we advertise in local publications, on local radio stations and in local spot television commercials. In addition to local advertising efforts, we maintain an informational Web site for the Cricket service. Although we currently do not sell our products or services directly over the Internet, some third-party Internet retailers do sell the Cricket service over the Internet.

      Network and Operations. The Cricket service is based on providing customers with levels of usage equivalent to landline and at prices substantially lower than most of our wireless competitors for similar usage. We believe our success depends on designing and operating our networks to provide high, concentrated capacity with good in-building coverage rather than the broad, geographically dispersed coverage provided by traditional wireless carriers. Our current and planned Cricket networks are in local population centers of self-contained communities where we believe roaming is not an important component of service for our target customers. Unlike traditional wireless providers who build comprehensive networks to permit full-roaming by their customers, we believe that we can deploy our capital more efficiently by tailoring our networks only to our target population centers and omitting underutilized roaming sites between those population centers.

      We also seek to maintain lower operating costs through simplified billing. Our simple, straight-forward bills show the monthly flat rate without any per-call itemization. This simple format is expected to result in fewer billing inquiries to our customer service center. Fewer calls to our customer service center should, in turn, result in reduced customer service expenses compared to more traditional wireless providers. In addition, because Cricket customers pay in advance for each month’s service, we minimize our costs of credit checks, bad debt expenses and customer fraud. We also maintain low operating costs by outsourcing our customer service center to third-party call centers. By centralizing customer service in a few locations, we are able to streamline our customer care operations and gain economies of scale while maximizing customer service availability.

      The appeal of our service in any given market is not dependent on the Cricket service having ubiquitous coverage in the rest of the country or region surrounding the market. Because our business model is scalable, we can launch our networks on a market-by-market basis.

      Cricket Communications, Inc. has entered into infrastructure equipment purchase agreements with Lucent Technologies, Inc., Nortel Networks, Inc. and Ericsson Wireless Communications, Inc. to lead the overall buildout of our Cricket networks for the 40 Market Plan. Under the terms of the agreements, Cricket Communications has contracted most site acquisition activities and other services associated with site development to third parties, including but not limited to these vendors. To the extent the vendors have been contracted to perform such services, they have subcontracted many of these services to a number of different suppliers. In connection with our purchase of equipment and services from Lucent, Nortel and Ericsson, these vendors have agreed to provide financing for the equipment and services they provide and for certain other related expenses. At December 31, 2001, Cricket Communications had $1,112.0 million outstanding under the vendor credit agreements, and $158.3 million in other long-term liabilities that are expected to be financed under the vendor credit agreements. Borrowings under the vendor credit agreements at December 31, 2001 had a weighted-average interest rate of 7.3% per annum. These agreements are described elsewhere in this report under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Credit Facilities and Other Financing Arrangements.” See also, “Risk Factors — High Levels of Debt Could Adversely Affect Our Business and Financial Condition” and “— Our Debt Instruments Contain Provisions and Requirements that Could Limit Our Ability to Pursue Borrowing Opportunities” described below.

5


Table of Contents

      Wireless Licenses. The following table shows the wireless licenses that we own which cover approximately 53.3 million potential customers:

                   
Market Population(1) MHz



Anchorage, AK
    461,478       30  
Birmingham, AL
    1,328,593       15  
Florence, AL(3)
    192,297       15  
Tuscaloosa, AL
    255,315       15  
Blytheville, AR(3)
    71,601       30  
Fayetteville, AR(2)
    332,638       30  
Fort Smith, AR(2)
    330,029       30  
Hot Springs, AR(2)
    140,502       15  
Jonesboro, AR(2)
    182,637       10  
Little Rock, AR(2)
    971,470       20  
Pine Buff, AR(2)
    154,091       20  
Russellville, AR
    99,561       15  
Nogales, AZ
    39,108       20  
Phoenix, AZ(2)
    3,539,920       10  
Tucson, AZ(2)
    857,246       15  
Merced, CA(2)
    230,409       15  
Modesto, CA(2)
    507,675       15  
Redding, CA(3)
    278,572       15  
Visalia, CA(2)
    503,948       15  
Denver/ Boulder, CO(2)
    2,759,099       10  
Ft. Collins, CO(2)
    256,324       10  
Greeley, CO(2)
    184,429       10  
Pueblo, CO(2)(3)
    316,376       30  
Lakeland, FL(3)
    489,650       10  
Albany, GA
    357,815       15  
Columbus, GA(2)
    366,390       30  
Macon, GA(2)
    668,632       30  
Boise, ID(2)
    596,255       30  
Idaho Falls, ID(4)
    225,322       15  
Lewiston, ID(3)
    124,661       30  
Twin Falls, ID(4)
    164,293       15  
Peoria, IL
    461,865       15  
Evansville, IN
    524,945       10  
Ft. Wayne, IN
    720,322       10  
Coffeyville, KS
    61,365       15  
Wichita, KS(2)
    660,794       30  
Middlesboro, KY(3)
    118,250       15  
Owensboro, KY
    165,216       10  
Adrian, MI
    99,413       25  
Battle Creek, MI(2)
    241,424       25  
Escanaba, MI(3)
    47,541       10  
Flint, MI(2)
    508,496       10  
Grand Rapids, MI
    1,090,913       25  
Houghton, MI
    47,227       10  
Iron Mountain, MI
    45,768       10  
Ironwood, MI
    31,989       20  
Jackson, MI(2)
    205,759       25  
Kalamazoo, MI(2)
    379,353       10  
Lansing, MI
    510,831       10  
Marquette, MI
    74,328       10  
Mount Pleasant, MI
    138,096       10  
Muskegon, MI
    226,631       25  
Saginaw-Bay City, MI
    640,657       10  
Sault Ste, Marie, MI
    58,007       20  
Traverse City, MI
    250,103       10  
Bemidji, MN(3)
    67,132       10  
Brainerd, MN(3)
    98,930       10  
Duluth, MN
    414,915       10  
Jackson, MS
    682,055       10  
Vicksburg, MS
    61,651       10  
Bozeman, MT(3)
    84,818       30  
Charlotte/ Salisbury, NC(2)
    2,107,435       10  
Greensboro/ Winston-Salem, NC(2)
    1,469,394       10  
Hickory, NC(2)
    345,317       10  
Fargo, ND
    317,873       15  
Grand Forks, ND
    202,542       15  
Lincoln, NE(2)
    349,510       15  
Omaha, NE(2)
    998,073       10  
Albuquerque, NM(2)
    842,451       15  
Gallup, NM
    145,922       15  
Roswell, NM
    81,586       15  
Santa Fe, NM(2)
    222,016       15  
Reno, NV(2)
    601,268       10  
Buffalo, NY(2)
    1,212,839       10  
Syracuse, NY(2)
    780,393       15  
Utica, NY
    298,911       10  
Dayton/ Springfield, OH(2)
    1,221,056       10  
Sandusky, OH(2)
    139,491       15  
Toledo, OH(2)
    789,824       15  
Tulsa, OK(2)
    958,093       15  
Eugene, OR(2)
    325,831       10  
Salem/ Corvallis, OR(2)(3)
    534,999       30  
Pittsburgh/ Butler/ Uniontown/ Washington/ Latrobe, PA(2)
    2,469,722       10  
Chattanooga, TN(2)
    572,258       15  
Clarksville, TN(2)
    268,476       15  
Cookeville, TN(3)
    139,561       15  
Dyersburg, TN(3)
    120,794       15  
Jackson, TN(3)
    289,279       15  
Kingsport/ Johnson/ Bristol, TN(3)
    711,686       15  
Knoxville, TN(2)
    1,130,516       15  
Memphis, TN(2)
    1,565,645       15  
Nashville/ Murfreesboro, TN(2)
    1,785,651       15  
Provo, UT(2)
    384,722       15  
Salt Lake City/ Ogden, UT(2)
    1,652,234       15  
Kennewick/ Pasco/ Richland, WA
    194,952       15  
Spokane, WA(2)
    751,212       15  
Yakima, WA
    258,928       15  
Appleton-Oshkosh, WI
    456,172       10  
Eau Claire, WI
    196,580       10  
La Crosse, WI-Winona, MN
    322,112       10  
Marinette, WI-Menominee, MI
    68,935       10  
Stevens Point-Marshfield-Wisconsin Rapids, WI
    215,593       20  
Casper, WY(3)
    146,928       30  
     
         
 
Total
    53,351,910 (5)        
     
         

(1)  2001 market population estimates provided by Easy Analytic Software Incorporated.
(2)  Designates wireless licenses or portions of wireless licenses in markets launched under our 40 Market Plan.
(3)  Designates wireless licenses covering a total of approximately 3.8 million potential customers that we have contracted to exchange and sell in several transactions for certain operating assets, cash and wireless licenses which cover a total of approximately 2.3 million potential customers in the following markets: Rochester, NY; Plattsburgh, NY; Watertown, NY; Marion, OH; Steubenville, OH; Johnstown, PA, Lufkin, TX; and Eagle Pass, TX. In these transactions, we have contracted to exchange only 15 MHz of our wireless licenses in the markets of Blytheville, AR, Lewiston, ID and Casper, WY, and only 10 MHz of our wireless licenses in the markets of Pueblo, CO and Salem, OR.
(4)  Designates wireless licenses, covering a total of approximately 0.4 million potential customers, for which we have agreed to contribute a 15 MHz portion of each wireless license to a third party in exchange for an equity ownership interest in such third party.
(5)  Upon the completion of the transactions described in the above footnotes (3) and (4), we will own wireless licenses covering approximately 53.0 million potential customers.

6


Table of Contents

     The following table shows the wireless licenses for approximately 23.8 million potential customers for which Leap was the winning bidder in the FCC’s re-auction of C-Block and F-Block PCS spectrum that was completed in January 2001. These license grants are subject to the resolution of litigation between the FCC and NextWave Telecom, Inc. currently under appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court.

                   
Market Population(1) MHz



New London, CT
    369,197       10  
Jacksonville, FL
    1,377,296       10  
Melbourne, FL
    482,322       10  
Columbus, IN
    156,509       10  
Indianapolis, IN
    1,569,550       10  
Lexington, KY
    935,826       10  
Louisville, KY
    1,496,153       10  
Worcester, MA
    754,348       10  
Asheville, NC
    615,193       10  
Las Cruces, NM
    254,011       10  
Albany, NY
    1,049,390       10  
Poughkeepsie, NY
    460,125       10  
Columbus, OH
    1,709,011       10  
Scranton, PA
    672,047       10  
Providence, RI
    1,588,140       10  
Austin, TX
    1,355,744       10  
Brownsville, TX
    361,365       10  
Bryan, TX
    187,229       10  
El Paso, TX
    757,233       10  
Houston, TX
    5,117,983       10  
McAllen, TX
    638,066       10  
San Antonio, TX
    1,880,744       10  
     
         
 
Total
    23,787,482          
     
         

(1)  2001 market population estimates provided by Easy Analytic Software Incorporated.

     Leap’s Rights and Interests. Our who