Back to GetFilings.com
| |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
| |
|
| |
FORM 10-K |
| |
|
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) |
| |
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001 |
| |
|
| |
or |
| |
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) |
| |
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
|
| |
Commission File No. 1-4748 |
| |
|
| |
SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC. |
| |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
| |
|
| |
DELAWARE |
| |
(State or other jurisdiction of corporation or organization) |
| |
|
| |
59-0763055 |
| |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
|
| |
1415 E. Sunrise Blvd. |
| |
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33304 |
| |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| |
|
| |
954-713-2500 |
| |
(Registrant´s telephone number, including area code) |
| |
|
| |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None |
| |
|
| |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None |
| |
|
| |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1)
has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
| |
|
Yes
x
No
o
|
| |
|
| |
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant´s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this
Form 10-K.
x
|
| |
|
| |
As of February 28, 2002, there were 100 shares of the registrant´s common
stock outstanding, all of which were owned by one shareholder. Accordingly
there is no current market for any such shares. |
| |
|
| |
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I (1)
(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced
disclosure format permitted by that General Instruction. |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
(A) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS
- -----------------------------------
Sun International North America, Inc. ("SINA") was incorporated in Delaware in 1958. As a result of a merger
transaction, SINA has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sun International Hotels Limited, a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas, ("SIHL") since December 1996. SIHL, through its
subsidiaries, develops and operates premier casinos, resorts and luxury hotels. In the United States, SIHL owns
and operates its properties and investments through SINA and its subsidiaries. In this Form 10-K, the words
"Company", "we", "our" and "us" refer to SINA, together with its subsidiaries as the context requires.
We earn income based on the gross revenues of a casino operated by an unaffiliated entity in Connecticut, which
is further described below under "ITEM 1. BUSINESS (C) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - Connecticut". In
addition, we provide management services to certain of our affiliated companies and we own a tour operator that
wholesales tour packages and provides reservation services. Prior to April 25, 2001, we owned a resort and
casino property in Atlantic City New Jersey ("Resorts Atlantic City"), which we sold to an unaffiliated entity.
Forward Looking Statements
- --------------------------
Certain information included in this Form 10-K filing contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, management's
beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as "expects", "anticipates", "intends", "plans",
"believes", "estimates" and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. Such statements may include information relating to plans for future expansion and
other business development activities as well as other capital spending, financing sources and the effects of
regulation (including gaming and tax regulation) and competition. Such forward-looking information involves
important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated future results and accordingly,
such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made herein. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to development and construction activities,
dependence on existing management, leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest
rates), availability of financing, global economic conditions, pending litigation, changes in tax laws or the
administration of such laws and changes in gaming laws or regulations (including the legalization of gaming in
certain jurisdictions).
Sale of Resorts Atlantic City
- -----------------------------
On April 25, 2001, we sold Resorts Atlantic City, a 644-room casino and hotel property, and certain related
assets to an affiliate of Colony Capital LLC ("Colony") for a purchase price of approximately $144 million,
including accrued interest (the "Resorts Atlantic City Sale"). We believe that Resorts Atlantic City was a
property that no longer fit into our overall business strategy. Subsequent to our acquisition by SIHL, we
planned to develop Resorts Atlantic City into a "must-see" destination resort. However, due to the difficulty in
acquiring the requisite land and other obstacles to development, we concluded our capital could be better
deployed elsewhere.
The proceeds received from Colony consisted of approximately $127 million in cash and an unsecured note
receivable for $17.5 million (the "Promissory Note"), bearing interest at a rate of 12.5% per annum. Interest
was payable semi-annually, with the option to pay one-half of the interest through the issuance of additional
notes. Of the cash proceeds, $79 million was used to pay in full the borrowings outstanding by Resorts Atlantic
City under a bank credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). Resorts Atlantic City, along with SIHL and
Sun International Bahamas Limited ("SIB"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of SIHL outside of SINA's consolidated
group, were co-borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. The remaining $48 million of cash proceeds from
the Resorts Atlantic City Sale was advanced to SIB and was used to permanently reduce borrowings outstanding by
SIB under that facility.
We entered into the definitive agreement to sell Resorts Atlantic City in the fourth quarter of 2000, and as of
December 31, 2000, we accounted for Resorts Atlantic City as an investment held for sale. The carrying value of
the net assets to be disposed of was reclassified to net assets held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets
and, in the fourth quarter of 2000, we recorded a loss of $229.2 million resulting from the write-down of net
assets held for sale to their realizable value. Therefore, the net proceeds received at closing equaled the
carrying value of the net assets disposed of, and accordingly, except for interest income earned during 2001 on
the proceeds, there was no further gain or loss recorded as a result of the closing. As of January 1, 2001, the
operations of Resorts Atlantic City are no longer included in our consolidated financial statements.
Pursuant to the terms of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, we granted Colony a two-year option (the "Atlantic City
Option") to acquire certain undeveloped real estate that we own adjacent to Resorts Atlantic City, for a purchase
price of $40 million, which option can be extended for an additional two years under certain circumstances. The
net carrying value of the land included in the Atlantic City Option is included in property and equipment in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Effective April 25, 2001, the closing date of the Resorts Atlantic City
Sale, Colony leases from us certain of the property included in the Atlantic City Option for $100,000 per month.
In March 2002, we received approximately $19 million from Colony as payment in full of the Promissory Note and
all outstanding accrued interest, which included an additional note issued to Colony on October 15 as Colony
elected to pay only 50% of the accrued interest due at that time in cash.
Mohegan Sun Casino Expansion
- ----------------------------
The Mohegan Sun Casino is a casino resort and entertainment complex situated in the town of Uncasville,
Connecticut, operated by the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, an instrumentality of the Mohegan Tribe of Indians
of Connecticut (the "Mohegan Tribe").
Trading Cove Associates ("TCA"), a Connecticut general partnership that we have a 50% interest in, and are a
managing partner of, was hired by the Mohegan Tribe to develop a $960 million expansion of the Mohegan Sun
Casino. In 2001, a substantial portion of the expansion was completed, which included an additional 119,000
square foot casino that opened to the public in late September 2001. The remainder of the expansion, which
includes a 34-story, 1,200-room luxury hotel and 100,000 square feet of convention space, is expected to open in
April 2002.
See "ITEM 1. BUSINESS (C) NARATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - Connecticut" for a further description of TCA and
our business activities related to the Mohegan Sun Casino.
Trading Cove New York
- ---------------------
Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we own 50% of Trading Cove New York, LLC ("TCNY"), a Delaware limited
liability company. In March 2001, TCNY entered into a Development Services Agreement (the "Development
Agreement") with the Stockbridge-Munsee Band of Mohican Indians (the "Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe") for the
development of a casino project (the "Project") in the Catskill region of the State of New York (the "State").
The Development Agreement was amended and restated in February 2002. The Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe does not
currently have reservation land in the State, but is federally recognized and operates a casino on its
reservation in Wisconsin and has a land claim pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New
York against the State.
Pursuant to the Development Agreement, as amended, TCNY will provide preliminary funding, certain financing and
exclusive development services to the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe in conjunction with the Project. As compensation
for these services, TCNY will earn a fee of 5% of revenues, as defined in the Development Agreement, beginning
with the opening of the Project and continuing for a period of twenty years. TCNY has secured land and/or
options on approximately 400 acres of property in the Town of Thompson, County of Sullivan (the "County"), of
which approximately 333 acres is currently designated for the Project. In February 2002, the Tribe filed a Land
to Trust Application with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (the "BIA"), for the
Project site properties. Should the BIA approve the Land to Trust Application and the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe
obtain other required approvals, the land could be taken into trust by the Federal Government on behalf of the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe for the purpose of conducting Class III Gaming.
In October 2001, the State enacted legislation authorizing up to three Class III Native American casinos in the
counties of Sullivan and Ulster and three Native American casinos in western New York pursuant to Tribal State
Gaming Compacts to be entered into by the State and applicable Native American tribes.
In January 2002, the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe entered into an agreement with the County pursuant to which the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe will make certain payments to the County to mitigate any potential impacts the Project
may have on the County and other local government subdivisions within the County. The payments will not commence
until after the opening of the Project.
The Project is contingent upon the receipt of numerous federal, state and local approvals to be obtained by the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe, including the execution of a Class III Gaming Compact with the State, which approvals
are beyond the control of TCNY. We can make no representation as to whether any of the required approvals will
be obtained by the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe.
Consent Solicitation of Noteholders
- -----------------------------------
On July 10, 2001, SINA along with SIHL (together, the "Companies"), commenced a consent solicitation with holders
of the Companies' $200 million principal amount of 9.0% senior subordinated notes due 2007 (the "9% Notes") and
$100 million principal amount of 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes due 2007 (the "8 5/8% Notes"). The Companies
sought proposed amendments of certain provisions of the indentures pursuant to which the 9% Notes and 8 5/8%
Notes were issued.
The proposed amendments effectively eliminate (as of December 31, 2000, the date the charge was recorded) the
impact of $199.2 million of the total $229.2 million loss recorded by SINA in connection with the Resorts
Atlantic City Sale, for purposes of determining the ability of SIHL and its affiliates to make certain
investments, such as certain minority investment in joint ventures. In addition, the amendments increased, from
2.0:1 to 2.5:1, the Consolidated Coverage Ratio required in order for the Companies to incur additional
indebtedness. The Consolidated Coverage Ratio is defined as consolidated earnings before interest expense,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") to fixed payments, as defined in the indentures. The
consent solicitation, as amended and extended, was finalized on July 23, 2001.
On July 24, 2001, the Companies announced that they had received the requisite consents from the holders of their
9% Notes and 8 5/8% Notes. Accordingly, the Companies and the trustee under the indentures executed and
delivered supplemental indentures containing the amendments described in the amended consent solicitation.
Pursuant to the consent solicitation, the Companies paid a total of $1.5 million in consent payments. Of this
amount, we paid our proportionate share of $1.0 million to holders of our 9% Notes.
Refinancing of SIHL
- -------------------
8 7/8% Notes
On August 14, 2001, the Companies issued $200 million principal amount of 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes due
2011 (the "8 7/8% Notes") which, after costs, resulted in net proceeds to the Companies of approximately $194
million. The 8 7/8% Notes, which are unsecured obligations, are unconditionally guaranteed by substantially all
of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Issuers (the "Guarantors"). Interest on the 8 7/8% Notes is payable on
August 15 and February 15 in each year, commencing February 15, 2002. The indenture for the 8 7/8% Notes
contains certain covenants, including limitations on the ability of the Companies and the Guarantors to, among
other things: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) incur certain liens, and (iii) make certain other
restricted payments.
All of proceeds received from the issuance of the 8 7/8 % Notes were advanced to SIB to further repay amounts
outstanding by SIB under the Revolving Credit Facility. Therefore, interest expense related to the 8 7/8% Notes
is offset by affiliated interest income from SIB.
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility (the "CIBC Revolving Credit Facility")
As previously stated, SINA, SIHL and SIB, were co-borrowers on the Revolving Credit Facility, for which the
maximum amount of borrowings outstanding was $500 million prior to 2001. In January 2001, the Revolving Credit
Facility was amended. In accordance with the amendment, the maximum amount of borrowings outstanding was reduced
by the amount of cash proceeds received pursuant to the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, which upon closing of that
sale, reduced the maximum amount of borrowings that could be outstanding to $373 million. This limitation on
borrowings was to be further reduced by the cash proceeds received from Colony if they exercised the Atlantic
City Option. The term of the Revolving Credit Facility was through August 12, 2002, at which time we would have
been required to pay in full any borrowings outstanding under that facility.
On November 13, 2001, SIHL, SINA and SIB, as co-borrowers, entered into the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility with a
syndicate of banks (the "Lenders"), with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC") acting as administrative
agent. The borrowings then-outstanding under the previous Revolving Credit Facility, all of which were reflected
on the balance sheet of SIB, were paid in full. Under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility, the maximum amount of
borrowings that may be outstanding is $200 million. An additional $150 million of borrowings may be available
under certain circumstances, subject to approval by all of the Lenders.
Loans under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at (i) the higher of (a) CIBC's base rate or (b) the
Federal Funds rate plus 1/2 of one percent, in either case plus an additional 0.25% to 1.75% based on a debt to
earnings ratio during the period, as defined (the "Leverage Ratio") or (ii) LIBO rate plus 1.25% to 2.75% based
on the Leverage Ratio. After each drawdown on the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility, interest is due every three
months for the first six months and is due monthly thereafter. Loans under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility
may be prepaid and reborrowed at any time and are due in full in November 2006.
The CIBC Revolving Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants that include: (a) restrictions on the payment
of dividends, (b) minimum levels of SIHL's consolidated EBITDA, and (c) a minimum relationship between SIHL's
consolidated EBITDA and interest expense and debt.
The amount of borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2001 on the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility was $24
million, all of which was drawn by SIB and is reflected on SIB's balance sheet.
(B) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
- -------------------------------------------------
Not applicable.
(C) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
- -------------------------------------
Connecticut
- -----------
Until December 31, 1999, TCA had a management agreement (the "Management Agreement") with the Mohegan Tribe to
operate the Mohegan Sun Casino. Under the Management Agreement TCA received between 30% and 40% of the net
profits, as defined, of the Mohegan Sun Casino. TCA is obligated to pay certain amounts to its partners and
certain of their affiliates, as priority payments. These amounts are paid as TCA receives sufficient cash to
meet those distributions.
In 1998, the Mohegan Tribe appointed TCA to develop its $960 million expansion of the Mohegan Sun Casino for a
fee of $14 million. In addition, TCA and the Mohegan Tribe entered into an agreement (the "Relinquishment
Agreement") whereby it was agreed that effective January 1, 2000, TCA would turn over management of the Mohegan
Sun Resort Complex, including its expansion, to the Mohegan Tribe. The term of the Management Agreement was
seven years beginning in October 1996, the date the Mohegan Sun Casino opened. Pursuant to the Relinquishment
Agreement, the Management Agreement was terminated and, effective January 1, 2000, TCA receives payments of five
percent of the gross revenues of the Mohegan Sun Resort Complex for a 15-year period. Pursuant to subcontracts
for management services, organization and administrative services and marketing services provided to TCA, we
receive certain priority payments from TCA. In addition, for seven years beginning January 1, 2000, TCA pays us
the first $5.0 million of the profits it receives pursuant to the Relinquishment Agreement as a priority payment
prior to making pro rata distributions to its partners.
We are one of two managing partners of TCA. All decisions of the managing partners require the concurrence of us
and the other managing partner, Waterford Gaming, L.L.C. In the event of deadlock there are mutual buy-out
provisions.
Description of Property
Prior to the expansion, the Mohegan Sun Casino featured a 176,500 square foot casino with 3,655 slot machines and
158 table games, as well as guest parking for 7,500 cars. The expansion includes a 119,000 square foot casino
containing 2,564 slot machines and 82 table games, a 34-story, 1,200-room luxury hotel, 100,000 square feet of
convention space, a 10,000-seat arena, 4,600 additional parking spaces, 130,000 square feet of retail space,
specialty retail shops and additional restaurants. The new casino opened in late September 2001, and the
remainder of the expansion is expected to open by April 2002.
We believe the Native American-themed Mohegan Sun Casino is one of the premier casino gaming properties in the
Northeast and one of the most profitable casinos in the United States. The property incorporates its historical
Native American theme through unique architectural features and the use of natural design elements such as
timber, stone and water. As a result of the expansion, the gaming area comprises approximately 296,000 square
feet of gaming space and features more than 6,200 slot machines, 240 table games and 42 poker tables. We believe
the Mohegan Sun Casino benefits from a superior location and strong demographics. It is located approximately
one mile from the interchange of Interstate 395 and Connecticut Route 2A in Uncasville, Connecticut and is within
150 miles of approximately 22 million adults. The Mohegan Tribe spent $40.0 million for infrastructure
improvements providing direct highway access to the property from Boston, Providence and New York.
Seasonality and Weather
Inclement weather can adversely affect the operations in Connecticut as the principal means of transportation to
this property is by automobile or bus. Higher revenues and earnings are typically realized from the Connecticut
operations during the middle third of the year.
Competition
The Connecticut market is the fourth largest gaming market in the United States, with approximately 22 million
adults within 150 miles of the Mohegan Sun Casino. The Mohegan Sun Casino and Foxwoods Resort and Casino
("Foxwoods"), at present are the only two casinos in the Connecticut market. Foxwoods has approximately 6,500
slot machines, and for the year ended December 31, 2001 reported slot revenue of approximately $783 million. The
Oneida Nation operates a casino near Syracuse, New York and other Native American tribes in the states of New
York, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut are seeking approvals to establish gaming operations which
would further increase competition, particularly for day-trip patrons. Mohegan Sun also competes with Atlantic
City and several small Native American gaming facilities throughout the northeast United States.
The Mohegan Sun Casino has primarily targeted day-trip customers. However, the new 1,200-room hotel, as part of
the current $960 million expansion, is scheduled to open in April 2002. We expect that, to some extent, the
availability of these hotel rooms will allow the Mohegan Sun Casino to compete with casino properties throughout
the United States.
In Connecticut, under the tribal-state compacts between the State and each of the Mohegan Tribe and the other
Native American casino in the State, Mohegan Sun is subject to a 25% gaming fee on slot revenues payable to the
State of Connecticut so long as the State does not issue any further licenses for gaming operations with slot
machines or other commercial casino games (other than to a Native American tribe on Native American land). In
March 2000, two additional Native American tribes in Connecticut, the Eastern Pequots and the Paucatuck Eastern
Pequots, received a proposed positive recommendation by the Federal Bureau of Indians Affairs to receive federal
recognition as tribes. The applications for federal recognition are pending. If either of the two tribes
receives federal recognition, they could seek to obtain trust land and approvals to conduct casino gaming in
Connecticut.
Casino gaming in the northeastern United States may be conducted by federally recognized Indian tribes operating
under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. A federally recognized tribe in Rhode Island and a federally
recognized tribe in Massachusetts are each seeking to establish gaming operations in their respective states.
Also, as previously discussed, in October 2001, the State of New York enacted legislation authorizing up to three
Native American casinos in certain counties. The Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe is seeking to develop a casino project
in the Catskill region of New York. We cannot predict whether any of these tribes will be successful in
establishing gaming operations and, if established, whether such gaming operations will have a material adverse
effect on the operations of the Mohegan Sun Casino.
Regulation
The Mohegan Tribe is a federally recognized Native American tribe whose federal authorities recognition became
effective May 15, 1994. In May 1994, the Mohegan Tribe and the State of Connecticut entered into a gaming
compact to authorize and regulate Class III gaming operations (slot machines and table games). Under this
tribal-state compact, Mohegan Sun is subject to a 25% gaming fee on slot revenues payable to the State of
Connecticut so long as the State does not issue any further licenses for gaming operations with slot machines or
other commercial casino games (other than to a Native American tribe on Native American land).
Each of the partners of TCA must be licensed by relevant tribal and state authorities. Each of the partners of
TCA has received a gaming registration from the Commissioner of Revenue Services of the State of Connecticut that
is renewed annually.
Waiver of Sovereign Immunity
Pursuant to the Relinquishment Agreement, the Mohegan Tribe has waived sovereign immunity for the purpose of
permitting a suit by TCA in any court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the Relinquishment
Agreement and any judgments arising out of the Relinquishment Agreement, including (i) the enforcement of the
Tribe's payment obligation to TCA with an award of actual damages in connection with any breach thereof and (ii)
an action to prohibit the Tribe from taking any action that would prevent the operation of the Relinquishment
Agreement. The only assets subject to payment or encumbrances for the payment of Tribal obligations under the
Relinquishment Agreement are any cash and the undistributed and future revenues derived from the Mohegan Sun
Casino.
Gaming Disputes Court
The Mohegan Tribe's Constitution (the "Mohegan Constitution") provides for the governance of the Mohegan Tribe by
a tribal council, in which the legislative and executive powers of the Mohegan Tribe are vested, and a
constitutional review board. On July 20, 1995, the tribal council enacted a tribal ordinance creating the Gaming
Disputes Court (the "Court"), which is composed of a trial and an appellate branch. The Mohegan Constitution and
the tribal ordinance establishing the Court give the Court exclusive jurisdiction for the Mohegan Tribe over all
disputes and controversies related to gaming between any person or entity and the MTGA, the Mohegan Tribe or
TCA. The Court has been authorized by the Mohegan Constitution to consist of at least four judges, none of whom
may be members of the Mohegan Tribe and each of whom must be either a retired federal judge or Connecticut
Attorney Trial Referee (who is an attorney appointed by the Connecticut Supreme Court).
Atlantic City Real Estate
- -------------------------
As described under the Resorts Atlantic City Sale in "ITEM 1. BUSINESS, (a) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS -
Sale of Resorts Atlantic City", effective April 25, 2001, we lease certain of the property included in the
Atlantic City Option to Colony. Pursuant to the lease agreement, Colony pays us a fee of $100,000 per month,
which is due on the first day of each month. We also own certain other undeveloped parcels of land in Atlantic
City, which are available for sale. See "ITEM 2. PROPERTIES" for a further description of land owned by SINA.
Florida
- -------
Through our offices in Florida, we provide general and administrative support services, marketing services,
travel reservations and wholesale tour services for SIHL's properties in The Bahamas. To a much lesser extent,
we also provide travel reservation services for unaffiliated properties in The Bahamas.
New York
- --------
Through one of our subsidiaries, we lease office space in New York City for our corporate marketing and public
relations office which provides services to SINA as well as its affiliated companies.
(D) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
- -------------------------------------------------
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Atlantic City
We own in fee simple approximately 13 acres of real property immediately adjacent to Resorts Atlantic City.
These properties, which are included in the Atlantic City Option, are zoned for casino hotel use and available
for future expansion. Certain of these properties are being leased by Colony for a fee of $100,000 per month.
We own in fee simple approximately 5 acres of undeveloped property in the Southeast Inlet section of Atlantic
City. In addition, we own in fee simple approximately 45 acres of property located in Atlantic City on
Blackhorse Pike, a portion of which may be considered to be wetlands.
All of the property that we own in Atlantic City, except for that which is subject to the Atlantic City Option,
is available for sale.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
US District Court Action - SINA v. Lowenschuss
As previously reported, in September 1989 SINA filed an action in the US District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania to recover certain sums paid to the defendant, as trustee for two Individual Retirement Accounts
and the Fred Lowenschuss Associates Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"), for SINA stock in a 1988 merger, in which
SINA was acquired by Merv Griffin. This action was transferred to the NJ Bankruptcy Court in connection with the
Company's former bankruptcy case commenced there in 1989.
In February 1992, the NJ Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion granting partial summary judgment in favor of SINA on
one of its six causes of action. The NJ Bankruptcy Court reserved the issue of remedies for trial.
In August 1992, Fred Lowenschuss filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Nevada (the "Nevada Bankruptcy Court"). As a result, the NJ Bankruptcy Court stayed SINA's action against
Lowenschuss.
The Nevada Bankruptcy Court confirmed Fred Lowenschuss' plan of reorganization in October 1993. SINA appealed
certain portions of the confirmation order and other orders of the Nevada Bankruptcy Court. In June 1994, the US
District Court for the District of Nevada (the "Nevada District Court") granted SINA's appeal in all respects.
In October 1995, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Nevada District Court's ruling in all
respects, and in November 1995, the Court of Appeals denied Fred Lowenschuss' petition for rehearing. On June
10, 1996, the United States Supreme Court denied Fred Lowenschuss' petition for a writ of certiorari.
All interested parties, including SINA, filed motions with the Nevada Bankruptcy Court about their respective
claims and priority rights under the US Bankruptcy Code. The Nevada Bankruptcy Court ruled on these motions, and
SINA and other parties appealed, first to the Nevada District Court and then to the Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. At the time that the United States Supreme Court denied SINA's petition for a writ of certiorari,
on November 29, 1999 (see discussion below), SINA had three appeals pending, one in the Court of Appeals and two
in the Nevada District Court. SINA voluntarily dismissed all three appeals and simultaneously withdrew its
proofs of claim in Lowenschuss' bankruptcy case.
On November 2 and 3, 1995, the NJ Bankruptcy Court held a trial on the merits of SINA's claims against the
trustee of the Pension Plan. On April 22, 1997, the NJ Bankruptcy Court issued a final opinion in SINA's favor,
and on May 20, 1997 entered a judgment in SINA's favor finding that the trustee for the two Individual Retirement
Accounts and the Pension Plan committed fraud against SINA and that SINA was entitled to restitution. The NJ
Bankruptcy Court awarded SINA $3.8 million plus prejudgment interest and $250,000 punitive damages, for a total
award of approximately $5.7 million. On July 7, 1997 the NJ Bankruptcy Court amended the judgment to apportion
the damages between the Pension Plan and the Individual Retirement Accounts. The NJ Bankruptcy Court also denied
Defendant's request for a stay of enforcement of the judgment. Subsequently, the Defendants filed an appeal of
the NJ Bankruptcy Court's decision in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey (the "New Jersey
District Court"). On March 26, 1998, The New Jersey District Court reversed the judgment of the NJ Bankruptcy
Court. SINA filed an appeal of the New Jersey District Court's decision with the US Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit (the "Circuit Court"). On June 30, 1999, the Circuit Court issued an opinion affirming the New
Jersey District Court's decision. SINA's subsequent petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States
Supreme Court was denied on November 29, 1999, thereby concluding this litigation.
In connection with that litigation, Laurance Lowenschuss, as trustee for the Pension Plan, and Fred Lowenschuss,
as trustee of the Trusts and as custodian, filed an action in May 1996 against SINA for preliminary and permanent
injunctive relief. The Lowenschusses sought an order from the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
(the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court") to extend the post-confirmation bar date of the Plan and to secure the return
of certain escrowed distributions to holders of Old Series Notes (as defined in the Plan).
On May 9, 1996, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court entered an order, to which the parties had stipulated, extending
the Lowenschuss' date of surrender for Old Series Notes through November 10, 1996. By further stipulations, the
date of surrender was further extended through May 12, 2000.
On March 8, 1996, Fred Lowenschuss, as trustee of various Lowenschuss children's trusts (the "Trusts"), and
Laurance Lowenschuss, as trustee for the Pension Plan, filed a counterclaim and a third party claim against SINA
and First Interstate Trust Company in the NJ Bankruptcy Court alleging that the Pension Plan and the Trusts
timely surrendered certain securities for exchange under the Company's 1990 plan of reorganization and that those
securities were wrongfully dishonored and returned. The Company replied to the counterclaims in April 1996 and
denied the allegations. Since 1996, the parties have voluntarily stayed this litigation, pending the resolution
of Lowenschuss' bankruptcy case in Nevada.
The foregoing litigation and bankruptcy proceedings have spawned additional and related litigation, including the
following: (a) an injunction action brought by Fred Lowenschuss, wherein the Nevada Bankruptcy Court enjoined
SINA from proceeding against Fred Lowenschuss individually; the Nevada District Court dismissed appeals by both
SINA and Fred Lowenschuss, and the Ninth Circuit, on March 6, 1997, affirmed the District Court's dismissal of
Fred Lowenschuss' appeal; (b) a malicious prosecution action brought by Fred Lowenschuss against SINA and its
counsel that was dismissed by the Nevada Bankruptcy Court and the Nevada District Court; on March 6, 1997, the
Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court's dismissal of Lowenschuss' appeal and awarded SINA monetary sanctions,
finding that the Lowenschuss' appeal was frivolous; and (c) an action filed by Laurance Lowenschuss, as trustee
of the Pension Plan, in the Nevada District Court against SINA, which was transferred to the NJ District Court;
in January, 1996, the NJ District Court referred the matter to the NJ Bankruptcy Court. In February 2001, the NJ
Bankruptcy Court granted SINA's motion to dismiss Lowenschuss' action for malicious prosecution in Adversary
Proceeding No. 96-2350 and denied SINA's motion to dismiss certain counterclaims in Adversary Proceeding No.
90-1005 related to the exchange of bonds in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court proceeding discussed above.
In December 2001, SINA and Lowenchuss entered into a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement to end all outstanding
disputes between the parties, which Stipulation and Settlement is pending NJ Bankruptcy Court approval.
ITEM 4. MATTERS OF A VOTE TO SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is no trading market for SINA common stock, all of which is owned by SIHL.
No dividends were paid on SINA common stock during the last two fiscal years. The indentures for certain of
SINA's indebtedness contain certain restrictions as to the payment of dividends by SINA.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The disclosure required by Item 6 has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
- ----------------------------
Our critical accounting policies are those which we believe require our most subjective or complex judgments as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We prepare our
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. Certain of our accounting policies, including the estimated lives assigned to our assets, the
determination of bad debt, asset impairment, the calculation of our income tax liabilities, and estimation of
contingencies and other liabilities, require that we apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate
assumptions for calculating financial estimates. We periodically assess the potential liabilities related to any
lawsuits or claims brought against us. While it is typically very difficult to determine the timing and ultimate
outcome of these actions, we use our best judgment to determine if it is probable that we will incur an expense
related to the settlement of final adjudication of such matters and whether a reasonable estimation of such
probable loss, if any, can be made. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from our
estimations. To provide an understanding of the methodology we apply, our significant accounting policies are
discussed where appropriate and in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- ---------------------
COMPARISON OF YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000
Casino and Resort Revenues and Expenses
- ---------------------------------------
Casino and resort revenues and expenses for the year 2000 reflect the operations of Resorts Atlantic City. As
described previously, we sold Resorts Atlantic City on April 25, 2001. As of December 31, 2000, we accounted for
Resorts Atlantic City as an investment held for sale, and the loss resulting from this transaction was recorded
during the fourth quarter of 2000. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2001, the operations of Resorts Atlantic City
are no longer included in our consolidated financial statements.
Tour Operations
- ---------------
Revenues and expenses from our tour operations increased slightly in 2001 compared to 2000, resulting in a slight
increase in earnings. This was a result of increased occupancy over the first eight months of 2001, compared to
the same period in 2000 at resort properties in The Bahamas operated by certain of our unconsolidated
affiliates. The increased earnings were substantially curtailed due to a significant decline in occupancy at the
Bahamian properties as a result of the events of September 11.
By the first quarter of 2002, call volumes at our tour operator had returned to the level they were prior to
September 11. This was partly due to an aggressive marketing campaign by SIHL in late 2001 to promote its
properties in The Bahamas. In addition, the number of people traveling has been steadily increasing compared to
the significant disruption in the travel industry in the aftermath of September 11. While it is not significant
to our financial condition, we anticipate that there will be some growth in our earnings from tour operations.
However, we cannot be assured that the return to pre September 11 business volume will have a positive impact on
our future earnings. In addition, we cannot be assured that other travel disruption events which we cannot
predict and are out of our control, and which could negatively impact our earnings, will not occur in the future.
Management Fees and Other
- --------------------------
Management fees and other income in 2001 increased by $6.6 million (26.2%) over the previous year. Payments
received by TCA in 2001, pursuant to the Relinquishment Agreement, were $15.6 million compared to $5.9 million in
2000, an increase of $9.7 million. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in development fees from TCA
of $3.8 million received in 2000.
As described in "ITEM 1. BUSINESS (C) NARATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS -Connecticut", payments received by TCA
pursuant to the Relinquishment Agreement represent 5% of gross revenues of the Mohegan Sun Casino. We have a 50%
interest in TCA, and we receive payments as TCA distributes cash to its partners. As a result of the recent $960
million expansion, which included an additional 119,000 square foot casino that opened in late September 2001
and a new 34-story, 1,200-room luxury hotel which is expected to open in April 2002, we anticipate that gross
revenues of the Mohegan Sun Casino Complex will increase in 2002. If such increase occurs, TCA will receive
increased payments pursuant to the Relinquishment Agreement in future periods, as compared to 2001, and
accordingly, the amount of cash distributed to us will increase. However, we cannot be assured as to the effect
of the expansion on the Mohegan Sun Casino or that other events which we cannot control or predict will
negatively impact business levels at that property.
In 2001, we received $820,000 of lease payments from Colony with respect to land in Atlantic City that they lease
from us effective April 25, 2001. The lease payment is $100,000 per month, and the lease terms are concurrent
with the Atlantic City Option. As previously stated, Colony has two years from April 25, 2001 to exercise such
option, and under certain conditions can extend the Atlantic City Option for an additional two years. If Colony
does not exercise the Atlantic City Option, upon its expiration, the land lease will continue on a month-to-month
basis. At that time the lease can be terminated by either Colony or us with thirty days notice, subject to
certain conditions.
Management fees earned for services we provide to our unconsolidated affiliates in The Bahamas amounted to
approximately $15.1 million in 2001, and were virtually flat compared to 2000. Such fees equal 3% of gross
revenues, as defined, and therefore are largely dependent on occupancy levels at SIHL's properties in The
Bahamas. As was mentioned previously, in 2001, the occupancy levels at the Bahamian properties were negatively
impacted by the events of September 11. While business levels in 2002 have returned to that of pre September 11,
we cannot be assured that other events, which we cannot predict, and which could negatively impact our occupancy
in The Bahamas, will not occur in the future.
Selling, General and Administrative
- -----------------------------------
Selling, general and administrative costs in 2001 decreased by $33.2 million (68.5%) compared to 2000. This was
primarily due to the Resorts Atlantic City Sale. In the prior year, selling, general and administrative costs
included $29.3 million at Resorts Atlantic City. In addition, corporate and administrative costs decreased by
$3.9 million, primarily due to lower payroll and related costs, and a reduction of costs related to corporate
information technology projects.
Depreciation and Amortization
- -----------------------------
Depreciation and amortization expense in 2001 decreased by $14.3 million compared to the prior year. In 2000,
depreciation and amortization expense at Resorts Atlantic City was $16.2 million. This was offset by an increase
in depreciation expense resulting from depreciation of new computer software placed into service at the beginning
of 2001.
Other Non-Recurring Operating Expenses
- --------------------------------------
In 2001, restructuring costs were comprised of severance payments made to employees who were terminated due to
the lower occupancy levels at SIHL's properties in The Bahamas subsequent to September 11. Expenses in 2000
included a write-down of assets related to the Resorts Atlantic City Sale and Atlantic City Option to their
realizable value. As a result of entering into the agreement to sell Resorts Atlantic City at a purchase price
less than its carrying value, the Company recorded a loss of $229.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2000.
Purchase termination costs of $11.2 million in 2000 related to the cancellation of the Company's agreement to
acquire the Desert Inn Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas from Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. These
costs included $7.2 million paid to Starwood pursuant to the Termination Agreement.
Other Income (Expense)
- ----------------------
Interest income in 2001 increased by $2.4 million. In 2001, interest income included $2.7 million earned on the
proceeds of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale and $1.5 million of interest earned on the $18 million principal
amount of notes due from Colony. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $1.6 million as the
prior year included interest earned at Resorts Atlantic City.
Affiliated interest income is comprised of amounts due from SIB. As described previously, the proceeds received
from the issuance of the 8 7/8% Notes were advanced to SIB and were used to pay down borrowings by SIB on the
Revolving Credit Facility. We earn interest on the advance of proceeds to SIB equal to interest expense we incur
on the 8 7/8% Notes.
Interest expense in 2001 increased by $3.0 million (12.3%) as compared to 2000. Interest expense related to the
8 7/8% Notes issued in August 2001 was $6.9 million. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in
interest expense related to the Revolving Credit Facility as proceeds from the Resorts Atlantic City Sale were
used to pay off borrowings outstanding by us under that facility.
Income Taxes
- ------------
We recorded a net tax benefit of $2.8 million in the year 2001 compared to income tax expense of $1.1 million in
the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we released $3.9 million of the valuation allowance on our
deferred tax assets, resulting in a tax benefit.
See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of our income taxes for the
years 2001 and 2000.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND CAPITAL SPENDING
- -------------------------------------------------
Liquidity
- ---------
At December 31, 2001, our working capital was $25.2 million, including unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of
$3.1 million. As of December 31, 2001, the amounts due from affiliates on our consolidated balance sheet
included $29.7 million of non-interest bearing, due on demand advances made to certain unconsolidated affiliated
companies.
Capital Resources and Other Sources and Uses of Funds
- -----------------------------------------------------
Sale of Resorts Atlantic City
- -----------------------------
On April 25, 2001, we sold Resorts Atlantic City and certain related assets to Colony for a purchase price of
approximately $144 million, including accrued interest. The proceeds received from Colony consisted of
approximately $127 million in cash and the $17.5 million Promissory Note. Of the cash proceeds, $79 million was
used to pay in full the borrowings outstanding by Resorts Atlantic City under the Revolving Credit Facility. The
remaining $48 million of cash proceeds was advanced to SIB and was used to permanently reduce borrowings outstanding
by SIB under that facility. The cash proceeds received from Colony were offset by approximately $6 million in
cost paid by us after closing, which included employee termination costs and legal fees.
Pursuant to the terms of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, we granted Colony a two-year option to acquire certain
undeveloped real estate that we own adjacent to Resorts Atlantic City, for a purchase price of $40 million, which
option can be extended for an additional two years under certain circumstances. Effective April 25, 2001, the
closing date of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, Colony leases from us certain of the property included in the
Atlantic City Option for $100,000 per month.
In March 2002, we received approximately $19 million from Colony as payment in full of the Promissory Note and
all outstanding accrued interest, which included an additional note issued to Colony on October 15 as Colony
elected to pay only 50% of the accrued interest due at that time in cash.
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility (CIBC Revolving Credit Facility)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 13, 2001, SIHL, SINA and SIB, as co-borrowers, entered into the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility with a
syndicate of banks, with CIBC acting as administrative agent. As a result of the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility,
the previous bank facility for which SIHL, SINA and SIB were co-borrowers was paid in full. Under the CIBC
Revolving Credit Facility, the maximum amount of borrowings that may be outstanding is $200 million. An
additional $150 million of borrowings may be available under certain circumstances, subject to approval by all of
the Lenders.
Loans under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at (i) the higher of (a) CIBC's base rate or (b) the
Federal Funds rate plus 1/2 of one percent, in either case plus an additional 0.25% to 1.75% based on the Leverage
Ratio, a debt to earnings ratio during the period, as defined or (ii) LIBO rate plus 1.25% to 2.75% based on the
Leverage Ratio. After each drawdown on the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility, interest is due every three months
for the first six months and is due monthly thereafter. Loans under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility may be
prepaid and reborrowed at any time and are due in full in November 2006.
The amount of borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2001 on the CIBC Credit Facility was $24 million, all of
which was drawn by SIB and is reflected on SIB's balance sheet.
Other Sources and Uses of Funds for 2002
- ----------------------------------------
During the next twelve months, we expect the primary source of funds from operations to be payments received from
TCA pursuant to the Relinquishment Agreement. In addition, we will continue to earn management fees for services
provided to certain of our unconsolidated affiliates. With respect to our long-term debt at December 31, 2001,
we are required to make cash interest payments each year amounting to $35.8 million. Included in this amount is
$17.8 million of interest related to the 8 7/8% Notes which is paid by SIB. We currently do not have any
immediate plans for significant capital expenditures during the next twelve months.
We believe that available cash on hand at December 31, 2001, combined with funds generated from operations and,
if required, funds available under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility will be sufficient to finance our cash
needs for at least the next twelve months.
Future Commitments and Funding Sources
- --------------------------------------
At December 31, 2001, our contractual obligations, with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year, were as
follows (in thousands)(a):
2004-
Contractual Cash Obligation Total 2002 2003 2005 2006 Thereafter
--------------------------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------
Long-term debt on SINA's $
consolidated balance sheet $400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $400,000
Long-term debt on SIHL's
consolidated balance sheet(b) 100,000 - - - - 100,000
CIBC Revolving Credit Facility on
SIB's consolidated balance
sheet (c) 24,000 - - - 24,000 -
Capital leases 89 70 19 - - -
--------- ------ ------ ------ -------- ---------
Total contractual cash obligations $524,089 $ 70 $ 19 $ - $24,000 $500,000 $
========= ====== ====== ====== ======== =========
(a) See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements herein for a further description of our debt
commitments.
(b) SINA is a guarantor and co-issuer of the $100 million aggregate principal amount of the 8 5/8% Notes.
(c) SINA is a co-borrower and guarantor of borrowings outstanding on the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility. At
December 31, 2001, all of the outstanding borrowings on this facility, which totaled $24 million, were
drawn by SIB and are reflected on SIB's balance sheet.
Other Matters
- -------------
Trading Cove New York
- ---------------------
Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we own 50% of TCNY. In March 2001, TCNY entered into the Development
Agreement with the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe for the development of a casino project in the Catskill region of the
State of New York. The Development Agreement was amended and restated in February 2002. The Stockbridge-Munsee
Tribe does not currently have reservation land in the State, but is federally recognized and operates a casino on
its reservation in Wisconsin and has a land claim pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
New York against the State.
Pursuant to the Development Agreement, as amended, TCNY will provide preliminary funding, certain financing and
exclusive development services to the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe in conjunction with the Project. As compensation
for these services, TCNY will earn a fee of 5% of revenues, as defined in the Development Agreement, beginning
with the opening of the Project and continuing for a period of twenty years. TCNY has secured land and/or
options on approximately 400 acres of property in the Town of Thompson, County of Sullivan, of which
approximately 333 acres is currently designated for the Project. In February 2002, the Tribe filed a Land to
Trust Application with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, for the Project site
properties. Should the BIA approve the Land to Trust Application and the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe obtain other
required approvals, the lands could be taken into trust by the Federal Government on behalf of the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe for the purpose of conducting Class III Gaming.
In October 2001, the State enacted legislation authorizing up to three Class III Native American casinos in the
counties of Sullivan and Ulster and three Native American casinos in western New York pursuant to Tribal State
Gaming Compacts to be entered into by the State and applicable Native American tribes.
In January 2002, the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe entered into an agreement with the County pursuant to which the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe will make certain payments to the County to mitigate any potential impacts the Project
may have on the County and other local government subdivisions within the County. The payments will not commence
until after the opening of the Project.
The Project is contingent upon the receipt of numerous federal, state and local approvals to be obtained by the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe, including the execution of a Class III Gaming Compact with the State, which approvals
are beyond the control of TCNY. We can make no representation as to whether any of the required approvals will
be obtained by the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe.
New Accounting Pronouncements
- -----------------------------
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
("SFAS") No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133, as
amended, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. SFAS 133 requires that every derivative
instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Changes
in the derivative's fair values will be recognized in income unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
We adopted SFAS 133, as amended, beginning January 1, 2001. Currently, we do not have any derivative financial
instruments and therefore, there is no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001
to be accounted for using the purchase method. SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2001 with respect to goodwill recognized on an entity's balance sheet as of the beginning of that fiscal
year. Under SFAS 142 goodwill will no longer be amortized, but rather tested at least annually for impairment
using a fair value based test. A loss resulting from impairment of such goodwill should be recognized as the
effect of a change in accounting principal in the initial period of adopting SFAS 142. In subsequent reporting
periods, goodwill impairment losses are to be recognized on a separate line item on the income statement included
in income from operations. As a result of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, all of the goodwill previously
recognized by SINA was written off in its entirety in the fourth quarter of 2000. Therefore, this new
pronouncement currently has no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." This pronouncement
addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets"
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. For long-lived assets to be held and used, SFAS
No. 144 retains the existing requirements to (a) recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and (b) measure an impairment loss as the
difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. SFAS No. 144 establishes one accounting
model to be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. We do not expect that the effect of adopting
SFAS No. 144 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our major market risk exposure is interest rate risk associated with our long-term debt. As previously noted, we
are part of a consolidated group for which SIHL is the parent corporation. SIHL attempts to limit the exposure
of the consolidated group to interest rate risk by managing the mix of fixed and floating rate debt, and by
entering into variable rate swap agreements to hedge certain of its fixed rate debt.
As of December 31, 2001, the carrying value of long-term debt reflected on our balance sheet is $399.4 million and
is entirely comprised of fixed rate debt, the 9% Notes and the 8 7/8% Notes. SIHL has entered into fixed-to-variable
rate interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges of our 8 7/8% Notes. The effects of these
interest rate swap agreements are reflected on the financial statements of SIHL as such agreements were entered into
by SIHL. Under the terms of these agreements, SIHL makes payments based in specified spreads over six-month LIBOR,
and receives payments equal to the interest payments due on the fixed rate debt. Giving effect to these agreements,
our fixed rate and floating rate debt as of December 31, 2001 represent approximately 50% each of total debt.
We are a co-borrower on the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility, and therefore, have future borrowing capacity
comprised of variable rate debt based on LIBO rate. As of December 31, 2001, SINA had not drawn any amounts on
this facility.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Company's consolidated financial statements are presented on the following pages:
Financial Statements Page Reference
Report of Independent Public Accountants 23
Consolidated Balance Sheets
at December 31, 2001 and 2000 24
Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 25
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Deficit
for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 26
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 2001, 2000 and 1999 27
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 28
Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II: Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999 46
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
- ----------------------------------------
To Sun International North America, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sun International North America, Inc. (a Delaware
corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholder's deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001. These financial statements and the schedule referred to below are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the schedule
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Sun International North America, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
The schedule listed in the index to the financial statements is presented for the purpose of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Roseland, New Jersey
January 25, 2002
SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands of Dollars, except share data)
December 31,
---------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------- -------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,084 $ 1,276
Receivables, net 1,477 1,434
Inventories 91 71
Prepaid expenses 712 872
Due from affiliates 43,542 7,506
Deferred tax assets 3,874 -
Net assets held for sale - 138,350
-------------- -------------
Total current assets 52,780 149,509
Property and equipment, net 63,151 70,536
Due from affiliate non-current 200,000 -
Subordinated notes receivable 18,018 -
Deferred charges and other assets, net 12,750 6,076
-------------- -------------
Total assets $ 346,699 $ 226,121
============== =============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt $ 70 $ 58
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 32,435 28,214
Due to affiliates - 5,771
-------------- --------------
Total current liabilities 32,505 34,043
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discounts 399,438 278,420
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities 431,943 312,463
-------------- --------------
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 7 and 14)
Shareholder's deficit:
Common stock - 100 shares
outstanding - $.01 par value - -
Capital in excess of par 192,635 192,635
Accumulated deficit (277,879) (278,977)
-------------- --------------
Total shareholder's deficit (85,244) (86,342)
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities and shareholder's deficit $ 346,699 $ 226,121
============== ==============
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Revenues:
Casino and resort revenues $ - $ 283,251 $ 269,763
Less promotional allowances - (25,288) (26,632)
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Net casino and resort revenues - 257,963 243,131
Tour operations 26,091 25,048 23,766
Management fees and other 31,565 25,007 22,000
-------------- --------------- ---------------
57,656 308,018 288,897
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Expenses:
Casino and resort expenses - 203,695 199,753
Tour operations 22,241 21,815 22,543
Selling, general and administrative 15,275 48,514 45,715
Depreciation and amortization 4,445 18,714 18,219
Restructuring expense 300 - -
Pre-opening expenses - - 5,398
Purchase termination costs - 11,202 -
Write-down of assets to be sold - 229,208 -
-------------- --------------- ---------------
42,261 533,148 291,628
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Operating income (loss) 15,395 (225,130) (2,731)
Other income (expenses):
Interest income 4,355 1,945 1,839
Affiliated interest income 6,930 - -
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest (27,742) (24,704) (21,000)
Other, net (684) (687) (729)
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Loss before benefit (provision) for income taxes (1,746) (248,576) (22,621)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes 2,844 (1,080) (2,845)
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Net income (loss) $ 1,098 $ (249,656) $ (25,466)
============== =============== ===============
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S DEFICIT
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
(In Thousands of Dollars)
Capital
Common in excess Accumulated
stock of par deficit Total
------------- ------------- --------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 $ - $ 193,008 $ (3,855) $ 189,153
Shares canceled - (373) - (373)
Net loss for year 1999 - - (25,466) (25,466)
------------- ------------- --------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 - 192,635 (29,321) 163,314
Net loss for year 2000 - - (249,656) (249,656)
------------- ------------- --------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 2000 - 192,635 (278,977) (86,342)
Net income for year 2001 - - 1,098 1,098
------------- ------------- --------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 2001 $ - $ 192,635 $ (277,879) $ (85,244)
============= ============= =============== =============
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss ) $ 1,098 $ (249,656) $ (25,466)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 4,445 18,714 18,219
Amortization of debt discount and issue costs 1,036 606 429
Write-down of net assets held for sale - 229,208 -
Write-off of Desert Inn purchase termination costs - 11,202 -
Utilization of deferred tax benefit (3,874) - -
Loss on disposition of assets 684 687 729
Provision for doubtful receivables 84 1,250 1,543
Provision for discount on CRDA obligations, net - 799 587
Net change in deferred tax liability - 205 (30)
Net change in working capital accounts:
Receivables (645) (3,284) (1,131)
Due from affiliates (4,558) 323 (7,443)
Inventories and prepaid expenses 140 359 (1,628)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,039 (167) 2,945
Net change in deferred charges (1,849) (1,293) (288)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 600 8,953 (11,534)
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments for major capital projects - (10,360) (34,943)
Operating capital expenditures (1,393) (9,047) (11,408)
Proceeds received from the sale of Resorts Atlantic City, net 120,850 - -
Acquisition of other fixed assets - - (9,433)
Deposit refunded (paid) for proposed Desert Inn acquisition - 7,750 (16,117)
Proceeds from sale of assets 2,196 395 5,052
Reclassification of cash to assets held for sale - (21,453) -
Other - (2,695) (2,746)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 121,653 (35,410) (69,595)
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings 200,000 6,000 73,000
Repayment of borrowings (79,063) (1,908) (8,710)
Advances from (repayments to) affiliates (235,132) 972 14,348
Debt issue and modification costs (6,250) - -
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (120,445) 5,064 78,638
------------- ------------- -------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,808 (21,393) (2,491)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,276 22,669 25,160
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 3,084 $ 1,276 $ 22,669
============= ============= =============
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - General
Basis of Accounting
- -------------------
Sun International North America, Inc. ("SINA") was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1958. As a result of
a merger transaction, SINA has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sun International Hotels Limited ("SIHL") since
December 1996. SIHL, a developer and operator of premier casinos, resorts and luxury hotels, is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas. SINA is a holding company through
which SIHL owns and operates its properties and investments in the United States. In these notes to consolidated
financial statements, the words "Company", "we", "our" and "us" refer to SINA, together with its subsidiaries as
the context may require.
We earn income based on the gross revenues of a casino operated by an unaffiliated entity in Connecticut (see
below). In addition, we provide management services to certain of our affiliated companies and we own a tour
operator which wholesales tour packages and provides reservation services. Prior to April 25, 2001, we owned a
resort and casino property in Atlantic City, New Jersey ("Resorts Atlantic City") which we sold to an
unaffiliated entity.
Connecticut
- -----------
We have a 50% interest in, and are a managing partner of, Trading Cove Associates ("TCA"), a Connecticut general
partnership that developed and until December 31, 1999, had a management agreement (the "Management Agreement")
with the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, an instrumentality of the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut (the
"Mohegan Tribe") to operate a casino resort and entertainment complex situated in the town of Uncasville,
Connecticut (the "Mohegan Sun Casino"). The Management Agreement which covered management, marketing and
administrative services, provided that TCA was entitled to receive between 30% and 40% of the net profits, as
defined, of the Mohegan Sun Casino. TCA is obligated to pay certain amounts to its partners and certain of their
affiliates, as priority payments. These amounts are paid as TCA receives sufficient cash to meet those priority
distributions.
In 1998, the Mohegan Tribe appointed TCA to develop its $960 million expansion of the Mohegan Sun Casino for a
fee of $14 million. In addition, TCA and the Mohegan Tribe entered into an agreement (the "Relinquishment
Agreement") whereby it was agreed that effective January 1, 2000, TCA would turn over management of the Mohegan
Sun Resort Complex, including its expansion, to the Mohegan Tribe. The term of the Management Agreement was
seven years beginning in October 1996, the date the Mohegan Sun Casino opened. Pursuant to the Relinquishment
Agreement, the Management Agreement was terminated and, effective January 1, 2000, TCA receives payments of five
percent of the gross revenues of the Mohegan Sun Resort Complex for a 15-year period. Pursuant to subcontracts
for management services, organization and administrative services and marketing services provided to TCA, we
receive certain priority payments from TCA.
Sun Resorts
- ------------
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Sun International Resorts, Inc., we provide general and administrative
support services, marketing services, travel reservations and wholesale tour services for SIHL's properties in
The Bahamas. To a much lesser extent, we also provide travel reservation services for unaffiliated properties in
The Bahamas.
Sale of Resorts Atlantic City
- -----------------------------
On April 25, 2001, we sold Resorts Atlantic City, a 644-room casino and hotel property, to an affiliate of Colony
Capital LLC ("Colony") for a purchase price of approximately $144 million, including accrued interest (the
"Resorts Atlantic City Sale"). The proceeds received from Colony consisted of approximately $127 million in cash
and an unsecured note receivable for $17.5 million (the "Promissory Note"), bearing interest at a rate of 12.5%
per annum. Interest is payable semi-annually, with the option to pay one-half of the interest through the
issuance of additional notes, the principal balance and all outstanding interest of the note and the additional
notes to be paid in April 2008. Of the cash proceeds, $79 million was used to pay in full the borrowings
outstanding by Resorts Atlantic City under a bank credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). Resorts
Atlantic City, along with SIHL and Sun International Bahamas Limited ("SIB"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of SIHL
outside of SINA's consolidated group, were co-borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. The remaining $48
million of cash proceeds was advanced to SIB and was used to permanently reduce borrowings outstanding by SIB
under that facility.
We entered into the definitive agreement to sell Resorts Atlantic City in the fourth quarter of 2000, and as of
December 31, 2000, we accounted for Resorts Atlantic City as an investment held for sale. The carrying value of
the net assets to be disposed of was reclassified to net assets held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets
and, in the fourth quarter of 2000, we recorded a loss of $229.2 million resulting from the write-down of net
assets held for sale to their realizable value. Therefore, the net proceeds received at closing equaled the
carrying value of the net assets disposed of, and accordingly, except for interest income earned during 2001 on
the proceeds, there was no further gain or loss recorded as a result of the closing. As of January 1, 2001, the
operations of Resorts Atlantic City are no longer included in our consolidated financial statements.
If this transaction had been consummated on January 1, 2000, on a pro forma basis, our results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2000 would be as follows (unaudited): Revenues - $46.2 million, net loss - $22.0
million. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of future results or what our results of
operation would actually have been had the Resorts Atlantic City Sale occurred at the beginning of the year.
Components of net assets held for sale as of December 31, 2000 are as follows (in thousands of US dollars):
Current assets $ 34,534
Non-current assets 173,233
Current liabilities (26,989 )
Non-current liabilities (42,428 )
-------------
$ 138,350
=============
Pursuant to the terms of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, we granted Colony a two-year option (the "Atlantic City
Option") to acquire certain undeveloped real estate which we own, adjacent to Resorts Atlantic City, for a
purchase price of $40 million, which option can be extended for an additional two years under certain
circumstances. The net carrying value of the land included in the Atlantic City Option is included in property
and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Effective April 25, 2001, the closing date of the
Resorts Atlantic City Sale, Colony leases from us certain of the property included in the Atlantic City Option
for $100,000 per month.
On October 15, 2001, interest due from Colony on the Promissory Note amounted to approximately $1 million.
Colony elected to pay one half of the interest in cash, while paying one half through the issuance of an
additional note (the "Accrued Interest Note"). Accordingly, effective October 15, 2001, the total principal
amount due from Colony on the Promissory Note and the Accrued Interest Note was approximately $18.0 million.
Termination of Desert Inn Acquisition Agreement
- -----------------------------------------------
On March 2, 2000, SIHL and Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Inc. ("Starwood") announced that they had agreed
to terminate their agreement (the "Termination Agreement") under which we were to acquire the Desert Inn Hotel
and Casino in Las Vegas (the "Desert Inn") for $275 million. In connection with the proposed acquisition of the
Desert Inn, we had previously placed a $15 million deposit with Starwood (the "Deposit"). Pursuant to the
Termination Agreement, the amount, if any, that we would be required to pay from the Deposit was based on the
ultimate sales price of the Desert Inn to another party.
In June 2000, Starwood closed on the sale of the Desert Inn for approximately $270 million, subject to certain
post-closing adjustments, to an unrelated party. As a result, we were required to pay to Starwood $7.2 million
from the Deposit. The remaining $7.8 million of the Deposit was refunded to us in August 2000. Purchase
termination costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations included the $7.2 million paid to
Starwood and $4.0 million of further costs related to the Desert Inn transaction.
Trading Cove New York
- ---------------------
Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we own 50% of Trading Cove New York, LLC ("TCNY"), a Delaware limited
liability company. In March 2001, TCNY entered into a Development Services Agreement (the "Development
Agreement") with the Stockbridge-Munsee Band of Mohican Indians (the "Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe") for the
development of a casino project (the "Project") in the Catskill region of the State of New York (the "State").
The Development Agreement was amended and restated in February 2002. The Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe does not
currently have reservation land in the State, but is federally recognized and operates a casino on its
reservation in Wisconsin and has a land claim pending in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of
New York against the State.
Pursuant to the Development Agreement, as amended, TCNY will provide preliminary funding, certain financing and
exclusive development services to the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe in conjunction with the Project. As compensation
for these services, TCNY will earn a fee of 5% of revenues, as defined in the Development Agreement, beginning
with the opening of the Project and continuing for a period of twenty years. TCNY has secured land and/or
options on approximately 400 acres of property in the Town of Thompson, County of Sullivan (the "County"), of
which approximately 333 acres is currently designated for the Project. In February 2002, the Tribe filed a Land
to Trust Application with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (the "BIA"), for the
Project site properties. Should the BIA approve the Land to Trust Application and the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe
obtain other required approvals, the land could be taken into trust by the Federal Government on behalf of the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe for the purpose of conducting Class III Gaming.
In October 2001, the State enacted legislation authorizing up to three Class III Native American casinos in the
counties of Sullivan and Ulster and three Native American casinos in western New York pursuant to Tribal State
Gaming Compacts to be entered into by the State and applicable Native American tribes.
In January 2002, the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe entered into an agreement with the County pursuant to which the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe will make certain payments to the County to mitigate any potential impacts the Project
may have on the County and other local government subdivisions within the County. The payments will not commence
until after the opening of the Project.
The Project is contingent upon the receipt of numerous federal, state and local approvals to be obtained by the
Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe, including the execution of a Class III Gaming Compact with the State, which approvals
are beyond the control of TCNY. We can make no representation as to whether any of the required approvals will
be obtained by the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribe.
NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
- ---------------------------
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SINA and our subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
- ----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We provide allowances for doubtful accounts arising from casino, hotel and other services, which are based upon a
specific review of certain outstanding receivables. In determining the amounts of the allowances, we are
required to make certain estimates and assumptions and actual results may differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
Revenue Recognition
- -------------------
We recognize the net win from casino gaming activities (the difference between gaming wins and losses) as gaming
revenues. Revenues from hotel and related services are recognized at the time the related service is performed.
Revenues from tour operations include commissions on the sale of travel reservations and are recognized at the
time of departure. Management fees and other operating revenues include fees charged to unconsolidated
affiliates primarily for executive management services. Revenues are recorded at the time the service is
performed.
Promotional Allowances
- ----------------------
The retail value of accommodations, food, beverage and other services provided to customers without charge is
included in gross revenues and deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated departmental costs of providing
such promotional allowances for the years ended December 31 are included in casino and resort expenses as follows:
(In Thousands of Dollars) 2001 2000 1999
----------- ------------ -----------
Rooms $ - $ 8,407 $ 5,536
Food and beverage - 15,502 14,634
Other - 3,201 6,704
----------- ------------ -----------
$ - $ 27,110 $ 26,874
=========== ============ ===========
Promotional allowances in the years 2000 and 1999 related to Resorts Atlantic City.
Derivative Financial Instruments
- --------------------------------
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
("SFAS") No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133, as
amended, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. SFAS 133 requires that every derivative
instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Changes
in the derivative's fair values will be recognized in income unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
As we had no derivative instruments as of December 31, 2001, the effect of adopting SFAS 133 had no impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Cash Equivalents
- ----------------
We consider all of our short-term money market securities purchased with original maturities of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
- -----------
Inventories of provisions, supplies and spare parts are carried at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or
market.
Property and Equipment
- ----------------------
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives reported below
using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes.
Land improvements 14 years
Hotels and other buildings 40 years
Furniture, machinery and equipment 2-5 years
Deferred Charges and Other Assets
- ---------------------------------
Deferred charges related to the Mohegan Sun Casino are amortized over the term of the Management Agreement. Debt
issuance costs are amortized over the terms of the related indebtedness.
Goodwill
- --------
Prior to January 1, 2002, goodwill was amortized on a straight line basis over 40 years. Amortization expense
included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to goodwill was $-0-, $2.6 million and
$2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. We will account for goodwill
under SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002.
Capitalized Interest
- --------------------
Interest is capitalized on construction expenditures and land under development at the weighted average interest
rate of our long-term debt. Interest costs of $907,000 were capitalized in the year ended December 31, 1999.
Casino Reinvestment Development Authority ("CRDA") Obligations
- --------------------------------------------------------------
Under the New Jersey Casino Control Act, we were obligated to purchase CRDA bonds based on gross revenues earned
at Resorts Atlantic City that bore a below-market interest rate, or make an alternative qualifying investment.
We charged to expense an estimated discount related to CRDA investment obligations as of the date the obligation
arose based on fair market interest rates of similar quality bonds in existence as of that date.
The discount on CRDA bonds purchased was amortized to interest income over the life of the bonds using the
effective interest rate method. All of our CRDA bonds were disposed of as part of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale.
Long Lived Assets
- -----------------
We review our long lived assets and certain related intangibles for impairment whenever changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset that we expect to hold and use may not be recoverable, future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the asset and its disposition must be estimated. If the undiscounted value of
the future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment would be recognized. We do
not believe that any such changes have occurred except as previously described as a result of the Resorts
Atlantic City Sale and the Atlantic City Option.
Income Taxes
- ------------
We file consolidated United States federal income tax returns.
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under this standard,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and
tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is recognized based on an
estimate of the likelihood that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Comprehensive Income
- --------------------
Comprehensive income is equal to net income (loss) for all periods presented.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
- --------------------------------
In June 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
accounted for using the purchase method. SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001
with respect to goodwill recognized on an entity's balance sheet as of the beginning of that fiscal year. Under SFAS
142 goodwill will no longer be amortized, but rather tested at least annually for impairment using a fair value
based test. A loss resulting from impairment of such goodwill should be recognized as the effect of a change in
accounting principal in the initial period of adopting SFAS 142. In subsequent reporting periods, goodwill
impairment losses are to be recognized on a separate line item on the income statement included in income from
operations. As a result of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale, all of the goodwill previously recognized by SINA was
written off in its entirety in the fourth quarter of 2000. Therefore, this new pronouncement currently has no impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." This pronouncement
addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible
long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. We believe the adoption of SFAS No. 143 will not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets"
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. For long-lived assets to be held and used, SFAS
No. 144 retains the existing requirements to (a) recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and (b) measure an impairment loss as the
difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. SFAS No. 144 establishes one accounting
model to be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. We do not expect that the effect of adopting
SFAS No. 144 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 - Receivables
Components of receivables were as follows:
December 31,
----------------------------
(In Thousands of Dollars) 2001 2000
----------- -----------
Interest Receivable $ 481 $ -
Trade Receivable 372 569
Other 746 988
----------- -----------
1,599 1,557
Less allowance for doubtful accounts (122) (123)
----------- -----------
$ 1,477 $ 1,434
=========== ===========
NOTE 4 - Property and Equipment
Components of property and equipment were as follows:
December 31,
--------------------------------
(In Thousands of Dollars) 2001 2000
------------- -------------
Land held for investment, development or resale $ 31,424 $ 37,254
Land and land rights 22,151 18,623
Land improvements - 299
Buildings and leasehold improvements 3,743 2,468
Furniture, machinery and equipment 14,478 11,670
Construction in progress 160 5,330
------------- -------------
71,956 75,644
Less accumulated depreciation (8,805) (5,108)
------------- -------------
Net property and equipment $ 63,151 $ 70,536
============= =============
There were no capitalized interest costs in the years 2001 and 2000, however, interest costs of $907,000 were
capitalized in 1999. Certain of our land held for investment, development or resale was placed into service
during 2001 as it is included in the land leased to Colony.
NOTE 5 - Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Components of accounts payable and accrued liabilities were as follows:
December 31,
--------------------------------
(In Thousands of Dollars) 2001 2000
------------- -------------
Accrued payroll and related taxes and benefits $ 4,342 $ 3,659
Trade payables 2,554 5,458
Customer deposits and unearned revenues 5,338 6,247
Accrued interest 12,005 3,673
Other accrued liabilities 8,196 9,177
------------- -------------
$ 32,435 $ 28,214
============= =============
NOTE 6- Deferred Charges and Other Assets
Components of deferred charges and other assets were as follows:
December 31,
--------------------------------
(In Thousands of Dollars) 2001 2000
------------- -------------
Debt issue costs $ 9,898 $ 4,677
Trading Cove New York 1,523 -
Mohegan Sun Casino 1,329 1,259
Other - 140
------------- -------------
$ 12,750 $ 6,076
============= =============
NOTE 7 - Long-Term Debt
Components of long-term debt were as follows:
December 31,
--------------------------------
(In Thousands of Dollars) 2001 2000
------------- -------------
9% Notes $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Unamortized discount (581) (663)
------------- -------------
199,419 199,337
8 7/8% Notes 200,000 -
Revolving Credit Facility - 79,000
Other 89 141
------------- -------------
399,508 278,478
Less current maturities (70) (58)
------------- -------------
$ 399,438 $ 278,420
============= =============
9% Notes
- --------
The 9% senior subordinated unsecured notes due 2007 (the "9% Notes") are unconditionally guaranteed by
substantially all of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of SIHL. Interest on the 9% Notes is payable on March 15 and
September 15 in each year. The Indenture for the 9% Notes contains certain covenants, including limitations on
the ability of the issuers and the guarantors to, among other things: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii)
incur certain liens, (iii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates and (iv) pay dividends and make certain
other payments.
8 7/8% Notes
- -------------
On August 14, 2001, SIHL and SINA (the "Issuers") issued $200 million principal amount of 8 7/8% senior
subordinated unsecured notes due 2011 (the "8 7/8 Notes") which, after costs, resulted in net proceeds to the
Issuers of approximately $194 million. The 8 7/8% Notes, which are unsecured obligations, are unconditionally
guaranteed by substantially all of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Issuers (the "Guarantors"). Interest on
the 8 7/8 % Notes is payable on August 15 and February 15 in each year, commencing February 15, 2002. The
Indenture for the 8 7/8% Notes contains certain covenants, including limitations on the ability of the Issuers
and the Guarantors to, among other things: (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) incur certain liens, and (iii)
make certain other restricted payments.
All of proceeds received from the issuance of the 8 7/8% Notes were advanced to SIB to further repay amounts
outstanding by SIB under the Revolving Credit Facility. Therefore, interest expense related to the 8 7/8% Notes
is offset by affiliated interest income from SIB.
Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
- ---------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental condensed consolidating financial statements of SIHL as the parent company and other guarantor
subsidiaries, as required under Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, will be filed with the SEC as part of SIHL's Form 20-F.
CIBC Revolving Credit Facility
- ------------------------------
SINA was a co-borrower along with SIHL and SIB under the previous Revolving Credit Facility. On November 13,
2001, SIHL, SINA and SIB, as co-borrowers, entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Facility (the "CIBC
Revolving Credit Facility") with a syndicate of banks (the "Lenders"), with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
("CIBC") acting as administrative agent. The borrowings then-outstanding on the previous Revolving Credit
Facility, all of which were reflected on the balance sheet of SIB, were paid in full. Under the CIBC Revolving
Credit Facility, the maximum amount of borrowings that may be outstanding is $200 million. An additional $150
million of borrowings may be available under certain circumstances, subject to approval by all of the Lenders.
Loans under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at (i) the higher of (a) CIBC's base rate or (b) the
Federal Funds rate plus 1/2 of one percent, in either case plus an additional 0.25% to 1.75% based on a debt to
earnings ratio during the period, as defined (the "Leverage Ratio") or (ii) LIBO rate plus 1.25% to 2.75% based
on the Leverage Ratio. After each drawdown on the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility, interest is due every three
months for the first six months and is due monthly thereafter. Loans under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility
may be prepaid and reborrowed at any time and are due in full in November 2006. Commitment fees are calculated
at per annum rates ranging from 0.25% to 0.50%, based on the Leverage Ratio, applied to the undrawn amount of the
CIBC Revolving Credit Facility and are due quarterly.
The CIBC Revolving Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants that include: (a) restrictions on the payment
of dividends, (b) minimum levels of SIHL's consolidated earnings before interest expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), and (c) a minimum relationship between SIHL's consolidated EBITDA and
interest expense and debt.
As of December 31, 2001, all amounts outstanding under the CIBC Revolving Credit Facility have been drawn down by
SIB and are reflected on SIB's balance sheet.
8 5/8% Notes
- ------------
SINA is a co-issuer and guarantor, with SIHL, on $100 million senior subordinated unsecured notes due December
2007 (the "8 5/8% Notes"). The 8 5/8% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed by substantially all of the
wholly-owned subsidiaries of SIHL. Interest on the 8 5/8% Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each
year. The 8 5/8% Notes were issued pursuant to a $300 million shelf registration for which $200 million is still
available. In December 1997, the $100 million of cash was drawn down by and the debt is reflected in the
consolidated financial statements of SIHL. The Indenture for the 8 5/8% Notes contains certain covenants,
including limitations on the ability of the issuers and the guarantors to, among other things: (i) incur
additional indebtedness, (ii) incur certain liens, (iii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates and (iv)
pay dividends and make certain other payments.
Consent Solicitation of Noteholders
- -----------------------------------
On July 10, 2001, SINA along with SIHL (together, the "Companies"), commenced a consent solicitation with holders
of the 9.0% Notes and holders of the 8 5/8% Notes. The Companies sought proposed amendments of certain
provisions of the indentures pursuant to which the 9% Notes and 8 5/