Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

FORM 10-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commission file number 2-89516

HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

200 Hopmeadow Street, Simsbury, Connecticut 06089

(860) 547-5000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes [X]   No[ ]

As of February 28, 2002, there were outstanding 1,000 shares of Common Stock, $5,690 par value per share, of the registrant, all of which were directly owned by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.

Table of Contents

HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS OF HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated)

General

Hartford Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries (“Hartford Life Insurance Company” or the “Company”), is a direct subsidiary of Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“HLA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hartford Life, Inc. (“Hartford Life”). The Company, together with HLA, provides (i) investment products, including variable annuities, fixed market value adjusted (“MVA”) annuities and retirement plan services for the savings and retirement needs of over 1.5 million customers, (ii) life insurance for income protection and estate planning to approximately 750,000 customers, (iii) group benefits products such as group life and group disability insurance for the benefit of millions of individuals and (iv) corporate owned life insurance, which includes life insurance policies purchased by a company on the lives of its employees. The Company is one of the largest sellers of individual variable annuities, variable life insurance and group disability insurance in the United States. The Company’s strong position in each of its core businesses provides an opportunity to increase the sale of the Company’s products and services as individuals increasingly save and plan for retirement, protect themselves and their families against disability or death and engage in estate planning. In an effort to advance the Company’s strategy of growing its life and asset accumulation businesses, Hartford Financial Services Group (“The Hartford”) acquired the individual life insurance, annuity and mutual fund businesses of Fortis, Inc. (“Fortis Financial Group” or “Fortis”) on April 2, 2001. (For additional information, see the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of the MD&A and Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

In the past year, the Company’s total assets increased 5% to $145.4 billion at December 31, 2001 from $138.8 billion at December 31, 2000. The Company generated revenues of $3.7 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.4 billion in 2001, 2000 and 1999 respectively. Additionally, Hartford Life Insurance Company generated net income of $646, $487 and $361 in 2001, 2000, and 1999 respectively.

Customer Service, Technology and Economies of Scale

The Company maintains advantageous economies of scale and operating efficiencies due to its continued growth, attention to expense and claims management and commitment to customer service and technology. These advantages allow the Company to competitively price its products for its distribution network and policyholders. The Company continues to achieve operating efficiencies in its Investment Products segment. Operating expenses associated with the Company’s individual annuity products as a percentage of total individual annuity account values reduced by nearly half since 1992, declining from 43 basis points to 22 basis points in 2001. In addition, the Company utilizes computer technology to enhance communications within the Company and throughout its distribution network in order to improve the Company’s efficiency in marketing, selling and servicing its products and, as a result, provides high-quality customer service. In recognition of excellence in customer service for variable annuities, Hartford Life Insurance Company was awarded the 2001 Annuity Service Award by DALBAR, Inc., a recognized independent financial services research organization, for the sixth consecutive year. Hartford Life Insurance Company is the only company to receive this prestigious award in every year of the award’s existence. Additionally, the Company’s Individual Life division won the DALBAR award for service of life insurance customers in 2001 and was the only life insurance operation to be recognized with this prestigious award.

Risk Management

The Company’s product designs, prudent underwriting standards and risk management techniques protect it against disintermediation risk and greater than expected mortality and morbidity experience. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had limited exposure to disintermediation risk on approximately 97% of its domestic life insurance and annuity liabilities through the use of non-guaranteed separate accounts, MVA features, policy loans, surrender charges and non-surrenderability provisions. The Company effectively utilizes prudent underwriting standards to select and price insurance risks, and regularly monitors mortality and morbidity assumptions to determine if experience remains consistent with these assumptions and to ensure that its product pricing remains appropriate. The Company also enforces disciplined claims management to protect itself against greater than expected morbidity experience.

Reporting Segments

Hartford Life Insurance Company has the following reportable operating segments: Investment Products, Individual Life and Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI). The Company includes in “Other” corporate items not directly allocable to any of its reportable segments, as well as certain group benefits, including group life and group disability insurance that is directly written by the Company and is substantially ceded to its parent, HLA. The following is a description of each segment, including a discussion of

3

Table of Contents

principal products, methods of distribution and competitive environments. Additional information on Hartford Life Insurance Company’s segments may be found in the MD&A and Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Investment Products

The Investment Products segment focuses, through the sale of individual variable and fixed annuities, retirement plan services and other investment products, on the savings and retirement needs of the growing number of individuals who are preparing for retirement or who have already retired. Investment Products generated revenues of $2.1 billion in 2001 and 2000 and $1.9 billion in 1999, of which individual annuities accounted for $1.4 billion in 2001 and 2000 and $1.3 billion in 1999. Net income in the Investment Products segment was $375, $354 and $300 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Hartford Life Insurance Company sells both variable and fixed individual annuity products through a wide distribution network of national and regional broker-dealer organizations, banks and other financial institutions and independent financial advisors. The Company is a market leader in the annuity industry with sales of $10.0 billion, $10.7 billion and $10.9 billion in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Hartford Life was among the largest sellers of individual variable annuities in the United States for 2001, 2000 and 1999 with sales of $9.0 billion, $9.0 billion and $10.3 billion, respectively. In addition, the Company continues to be among the largest sellers of individual variable annuities through banks in the United States.

In addition to its leading position in individual annuities, the Company continues to emerge as a significant participant in the mutual fund business and is among the top providers of retirement products and services, including asset management and plan administration sold to corporations pursuant to Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) (referred to as “401(k)”) and to municipalities pursuant to Section 457 of the Code, as amended (referred to as “Section 457”). The Company also provides structured settlement contracts, terminal funding products and other investment products such as guaranteed investment contracts (“GICs”).

As previously mentioned, The Hartford acquired the individual annuity businesses of Fortis, Inc. in 2001. This acquisition helped solidify the Company’s strong position in variable annuities.

Principal Products

Individual Variable Annuities — Hartford Life Insurance Company earns fees, based on policyholders’ account values, for managing variable annuity assets and maintaining policyholder accounts. The Company uses specified portions of the periodic deposits paid by a customer to purchase units in one or more mutual funds as directed by the customer who then assumes the investment performance risks and rewards. As a result, variable annuities permit policyholders to choose aggressive or conservative investment strategies, as they deem appropriate, without affecting the composition and quality of assets in the Company’s general account. These products offer the policyholder a variety of equity and fixed income options, as well as the ability to earn a guaranteed rate of interest in the general account of the Company. The Company offers an enhanced guaranteed rate of interest for a specified period of time (no longer than twelve months) if the policyholder elects to dollar-cost average funds from the Company’s general account into one or more non-guaranteed separate accounts. Due to this enhanced rate and the volatility experienced in the overall equity markets, this option continues to be popular with policyholders. Policyholders may make deposits of varying amounts at regular or irregular intervals and the value of these assets fluctuates in accordance with the investment performance of the funds selected by the policyholder. To encourage persistency, many of the Company’s individual variable annuities are subject to withdrawal restrictions and surrender charges. Surrender charges range initially from 5% to 8% of the contract’s initial deposit less withdrawals and reduce to zero on a sliding scale, usually within seven policy years. Volatility experienced by the equity markets over the past few years did not cause a significant increase in variable annuity surrenders, demonstrating that policyholders are generally aware of the long-term nature of these products. Individual variable annuity account values of $74.6 billion as of December 31, 2001, have grown significantly from $13.1 billion as of December 31, 1994, due to strong net cash flow, resulting from high level of sales, low levels of surrenders and equity market appreciation. Approximately 94% and 96% of the individual variable annuity account values were held in non-guaranteed separate accounts as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The assets underlying the Company’s variable annuities are managed both internally and by outside money managers, while the Company provides all policy administration services. The Company utilizes a select group of money managers, such as Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington”), Putnam Financial Services, Inc. (“Putnam”), American Funds, MFS Investment Management (“MFS”), Franklin Templeton Group, AIM Investments (“AIM”) and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter InterCapital, Inc. All have an interest in the continued growth in sales of the Company’s products and greatly enhance the marketability of the Company’s annuities and the strength of its product offerings. The Company’s Director variable annuity, which is managed in part by Wellington, continues to be an industry leader in terms of sales. In addition, The Hartford Leaders, which is a multi-manager variable annuity that combines the product manufacturing, wholesaling and service capabilities of Hartford Life with the investment management expertise of four of the nations most successful investment management organizations, American Funds, Franklin Templeton Group, AIM and MFS, has quickly emerged as a strong selling product for the Company.

4

Table of Contents

Fixed MVA Annuities — Fixed MVA annuities are fixed rate annuity contracts which guarantee a specific sum of money to be paid in the future, either as a lump sum or as monthly income. In the event that a policyholder surrenders a policy prior to the end of the guarantee period, the MVA feature increases or decreases the cash surrender value of the annuity in respect of any interest rate decreases or increases, respectively, thereby protecting the Company from losses due to higher interest rates at the time of surrender. The amount of payment will not fluctuate due to adverse changes in the Company’s investment return, mortality experience or expenses. The Company’s primary fixed MVA annuities have terms varying from one to ten years with an average term of approximately eight years. Account values of fixed MVA annuities were $9.6 billion and $9.0 billion as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Governmental — The Company sells retirement plan products and services to municipalities under Section 457 plans. The Company offers a number of different funds, both fixed income and equity, to the employees in Section 457 plans. Generally, the Company manages the fixed income funds and certain other outside money managers act as advisors to the equity funds offered in Section 457 plans administered by the Company. As of December 31, 2001, the Company administered over 3,000 Section 457 plans.

Corporate — The Company sells retirement plan products and services to corporations under Section 401(k) plans targeting the small and medium case markets since the Company believes these markets are underpenetrated in comparison to the large case market. As of December 31, 2001, the Company administered over 2,400 Section 401(k) plans.

Institutional Liabilities — The Company sells structured settlement contracts which provide for periodic payments to an injured person or survivor for a generally determinable number of years, typically in settlement of a claim under a liability policy in lieu of a lump sum settlement. The Company’s structured settlements are sold through The Hartford’s Property & Casualty insurance operations as well as specialty brokers. The Company also markets other annuity contracts for special purposes such as the funding of terminated defined benefit pension plans. In addition, the Company offers GICs and short-term funding agreements.

Section 529 Plans — The Company is introducing a tax advantaged college savings product (529 Plan) in early 2002 called SMART 529. SMART 529 is a state-sponsored education savings program established by the State of West Virginia which offers an easy way for both the residents of West Virginia and out-of-state participants to invest for a college education. In 1996, Congress created a tax-advantaged college savings program (529 Plan) as part of Section 529 of the Code. The 529 Plan is an investment plan operated by a state designed to help families save for future college costs. On January 1, 2002, 529 Plans became federal tax exempt for qualified withdrawals.

SMART 529 is designed to be flexible by allowing investors to choose from a wide variety of investment portfolios to match their risk preference to help investors accumulate savings for college. An individual can open a SMART 529 account for anyone, at any age. The SMART 529 product complements the Company’s existing offering of investment products (mutual funds, variable annuities, 401 (k), 457 and 403 (b) plans). It also leverages the Company’s capabilities in distribution, service and fund performance. The Company believes this is a significant market opportunity and the benefits of investing in 529 plans will be well received by many Americans saving for college.

Marketing and Distribution

The Investment Products distribution network is based on management’s strategy of utilizing multiple and competing distribution channels to achieve the broadest distribution to reach target customers. The success of the Company’s marketing and distribution system depends on its product offerings, fund performance, successful utilization of wholesaling organizations, quality of customer service, and relationships with national and regional broker-dealer firms, banks and other financial institutions, and independent financial advisors (through which the sale of the Company’s individual annuities to customers is consummated).

Hartford Life Insurance Company maintains a distribution network of approximately 1,500 broker-dealers and approximately 500 banks. As of September 30, 2001, the Company was selling products through 24 of the 25 largest retail banks in the United States, including proprietary relationships with 10 of the top 25. The Company periodically negotiates provisions and terms of its relationships with unaffiliated parties, and there can be no assurance that such terms will remain acceptable to the Company or such third parties. The Company’s primary wholesaler of it’s individual annuities is its wholly-owned subsidiary, PLANCO Financial Services, Inc. and its affiliate, PLANCO, Incorporated (collectively “PLANCO”). PLANCO is one of the nation’s largest wholesalers of individual annuities and has played a significant role in the Company’s growth over the past decade. As a wholesaler, PLANCO distributes the Company’s fixed and variable annuities, mutual funds, 401(k) and single premium variable life insurance by providing sales support to registered representatives, financial planners and broker-dealers at brokerage firms and banks across the United States. Owning PLANCO secures an important distribution channel for the Company and gives the Company a wholesale distribution platform which it can expand in terms of both the number of individuals wholesaling its products and the portfolio of products which they wholesale. In addition, the Company uses internal personnel with extensive experience in the Section 457 market, as well as access to the Section 401(k) market, to sell its products and services in the retirement plan market.

5

Table of Contents

Competition

The Investment Products segment competes with numerous other insurance companies as well as certain banks, securities brokerage firms, investment advisors and other financial intermediaries marketing annuities, mutual funds and other retirement-oriented products. The 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“the Financial Services Modernization Act”), which allows affiliations among banks, insurance companies and securities firms, has not precipitated any significant changes in bank ownership of insurance companies. (For additional information, see the Regulatory Matters and Contingencies section of the MD&A.) Product sales are affected by competitive factors such as investment performance ratings, product design, visibility in the marketplace, financial strength ratings, distribution capabilities, levels of charges and credited rates, reputation and customer service.

Individual Life

The Individual Life segment sells a variety of products including variable life, universal life, interest sensitive whole life and term life insurance primarily to the high end estate and business planning markets. The individual life business acquired from Fortis added significant scale to the Company’s Individual Life segment, contributing to the significant increase in life insurance in force. Revenues were $774, $545 and $574 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Net income in the Individual Life segment was $106, $70 and $68 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Principal Products

The trend in the individual life insurance industry has been a shift away from traditional products towards variable life (including variable universal life) insurance products, in which the Company has been on the leading edge. In 2001, of the Company’s new sales of individual life insurance, 82% was variable life and 15% was either universal life or interest sensitive whole life. The Company also sold a small amount of term life insurance.

Variable Life — Variable life insurance provides a return linked to an underlying investment portfolio and the Company allows policyholders to determine their desired asset mix among a variety of underlying mutual funds. As the return on the investment portfolio increases or decreases, as the case may be, the death benefit or surrender value of the variable life policy may increase or decrease. The Company’s single premium variable life product provides a death benefit to the policy beneficiary based on a single premium deposit. The Company’s second-to-die products are distinguished from other products in that two lives are insured rather than one, and the policy proceeds are paid upon the death of both insureds. Second-to-die policies are frequently used in estate planning, often to fund estate taxes for a married couple.

Universal Life and Interest Sensitive Whole Life — Universal life and interest sensitive whole life insurance coverages provide life insurance with adjustable rates of return based on current interest rates. The Company offers both flexible and fixed premium policies and provides policyholders with flexibility in the available coverage, the timing and amount of premium payments and the amount of the death benefit, provided there are sufficient policy funds to cover all policy charges for the coming period. The Company also sells universal life insurance policies with a second-to-die feature similar to that of the variable life insurance product offered.

Marketing and Distribution

Consistent with the Company’s strategy to access multiple distribution outlets, the Individual Life distribution organization has been developed to penetrate a multitude of retail sales channels. These include independent life insurance sales professionals; agents of other companies; national, regional and independent broker-dealers; banks and property and casualty insurance organizations. The primary organization used to wholesale the Company’s products to these outlets is a group of highly qualified life insurance professionals with specialized training in sophisticated life insurance sales, particularly as it pertains to estate and business planning. These individuals are generally employees of Hartford Life who are managed through a regional sales office system. The Company has grown this organization rapidly the past few years to over 225 individuals and expects to continue to increase the number of wholesalers in the future. The acquisition of the United States individual life insurance business of Fortis has broadened the Company’s reach in the emerging affluent market with the addition of a retail broker-dealer consisting of approximately 2,300 registered representatives.

Competition

The Individual Life segment competes with approximately 1,800 life insurance companies in the United States, as well as other financial intermediaries marketing insurance products. Competitive factors related to this segment are primarily the breadth and quality of life insurance products offered, pricing, relationships with third-party distributors and the quality of underwriting and customer service.

Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI)

The Company is a leader in the COLI market, which includes life insurance policies purchased by a company on the lives of its employees, with the company or a trust sponsored by the company named as the beneficiary under the policy. Until the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPA Act of 1996”), the Company sold two principal types of COLI,

6

Table of Contents

leveraged and variable products. Leveraged COLI is a fixed premium life insurance policy owned by a company or a trust sponsored by a company. The HIPA Act of 1996 phased out the deductibility of interest on policy loans under leveraged COLI at the end of 1998, virtually eliminating all future sales of leveraged COLI. Variable COLI continues to be a product used by employers to fund non-qualified benefits or other postemployment benefit liabilities.

Variable COLI account values were $18.0 billion and $15.9 billion as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Leveraged COLI account values decreased to $4.3 billion as of December 31, 2001 from $5.0 billion as of December 31, 2000, primarily due to the continuing effects of the HIPA Act of 1996. COLI generated revenues of $717, $765 and $830 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. COLI generated net income of $36, $35 and $28 in 2001, 2000 and 1999 respectively.

Other Matters

Reserves

In accordance with applicable insurance regulations under which Hartford Life Insurance Company operates, life insurance subsidiaries of the Company establish and carry as liabilities, actuarially determined reserves which are calculated to meet the Company’s future obligations. Reserves for life insurance and disability contracts are based on actuarially recognized methods using prescribed morbidity and mortality tables in general use in the United States, which are modified to reflect the Company’s actual experience when appropriate. These reserves are computed at amounts that, with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates, are expected to be sufficient to meet the Company’s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured’s death. Reserves also include unearned premiums, premium deposits, claims incurred but not reported and claims reported but not yet paid. Reserves for assumed reinsurance are computed in a manner that is comparable to direct insurance reserves. Additional information on reserves may be found in the Deferred Acquisition Costs (DAC) and Reserves section of the MD&A.

Regulation and Premium Rates

Insurance companies are subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision throughout the United States. The extent of such regulation varies, but generally has its source in statutes which delegate regulatory, supervisory and administrative powers to state insurance departments. Such powers relate to, among other things, the standards of solvency that must be met and maintained; the licensing of insurers and their agents; the nature of and limitations on investments; premium rates; claim handling and trade practices; restrictions on the size of risks which may be insured under a single policy; deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders; approval of policy forms; periodic examinations of the affairs of companies; annual and other reports required to be filed on the financial condition of companies or for other purposes; fixing maximum interest rates on life insurance policy loans and minimum rates for accumulation of surrender values; and the adequacy of reserves and other necessary provisions for unearned premiums, unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses and other liabilities, both reported and unreported.

Most states have enacted legislation that regulates insurance holding company systems such as Hartford Life Insurance Company. This legislation provides that each insurance company in the system is required to register with the insurance department of its state of domicile and furnish information concerning the operations of companies within the holding company system which may materially affect the operations, management or financial condition of the insurers within the system. All transactions within a holding company system affecting insurers must be fair and equitable. Notice to the insurance departments is required prior to the consummation of transactions affecting the ownership or control of an insurer and of certain material transactions between an insurer and any entity in its holding company system. In addition, certain of such transactions cannot be consummated without the applicable insurance department’s prior approval.

Reinsurance

In accordance with normal industry practice, Hartford Life Insurance Company is involved in both the cession and assumption of insurance with other insurance and reinsurance companies. As of December 31, 2001, the maximum amount of life insurance retained on any one life by any one of the Company's operations was approximately $2.5.

Investment Operations

The Company’s investment operations are managed by its investment strategy group which reports directly to senior management of the Company. Hartford Life Insurance Company’s investments have been separated into specific portfolios which support specific classes of product liabilities. The investment strategy group works closely with the product lines to develop investment guidelines, including duration targets, asset allocation and convexity constraints, asset/liability mismatch tolerances and return objectives, to ensure that the product line’s individual risk and return objectives are met. The Company’s primary investment objective for its general account and guaranteed separate accounts is to maximize after-tax returns consistent with acceptable risk parameters, including the management of the interest rate sensitivity of invested assets to that of policyholder obligations. For further discussion

7

Table of Contents

of Hartford Life Insurance Company’s approach to managing risks, see the Investments and Capital Markets Risk Management sections of the MD&A, as well as Notes 2(d), 2(e) and 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Ratings

Reference is made to the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of the MD&A under “Ratings”.

Risk-Based Capital

Reference is made to the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of the MD&A under “Risk-Based Capital”.

Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives

Reference is made to the Regulatory Matters and Contingencies section of the MD&A under “Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives”.

Guaranty Fund

Reference is made to the Regulatory Matters and Contingencies section of the MD&A under “Guaranty Fund”.

NAIC Codification

Reference is made to the Regulatory Matters and Contingencies section of the MD&A under “NAIC Codification”.

Dependence on Certain Third Party Relationships

Reference is made to the Regulatory Matters and Contingencies section of the MD&A under “Dependence on Certain Third Party Relationships”.

Employees

Hartford Life had approximately 6,700 employees at February 28, 2002.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Hartford Life Insurance Company’s principal executive offices are located in Simsbury, Connecticut. The Company’s home office complex consists of approximately 655 thousand square feet, and is leased from a third party by Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford Fire), a direct subsidiary of The Hartford. This lease expires in the year 2009. Expenses associated with these offices are allocated on a direct basis to Hartford Life Insurance Company by Hartford Fire. The Company believes its properties and facilities are suitable and adequate for current operations.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Hartford Life Insurance Company is involved or may become involved in various legal actions, in the normal course of its business, in which claims for alleged economic and punitive damages have been or may be asserted. Some of the pending litigation has been filed as purported class actions and some actions have been filed in certain jurisdictions that permit punitive damage awards that are disproportionate to the actual damages incurred. Although there can be no assurances, at the present time, the Company does not anticipate that the ultimate liability arising from potential, pending or threatened legal actions, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses and costs of defense, will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operating results of the Company.

8

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR HARTFORD LIFE’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

All of the Company’s outstanding shares are owned by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, which is ultimately a subsidiary of The Hartford. As of February 28, 2002, the Company had issued and outstanding 1,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $5,690 per share.

9

Table of Contents

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollar amounts in millions, unless otherwise stated)

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) addresses the financial condition of Hartford Life Insurance Company, and its subsidiaries (“Hartford Life Insurance Company” or the “Company”) as of December 31, 2001, compared with December 31, 2000, and its results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes beginning on page F-1.

Certain of the statements contained herein or in Part I of the Company’s Form 10-K, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include estimates and assumptions related to economic, competitive and legislative developments. These forward-looking statements are subject to change and uncertainty, which are, in many instances, beyond Hartford Life Insurance Company’s control and have been made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with management’s expectations or that the effect of future developments on Hartford Life Insurance Company will be those anticipated by management. Actual results could differ materially from those expected by the Company, depending on the outcome of certain factors, including the possibility of general economic and business conditions that are less favorable than anticipated, legislative developments, changes in interest rates or the stock markets, stronger than anticipated competitive activity and those factors described in such forward-looking statements.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform to the current year presentation.

INDEX

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Hartford Life Insurance Company provides investment and retirement products such as variable and fixed annuities, mutual funds and retirement plan services; individual and corporate owned life insurance; and, group benefit products such as group life and group disability insurance that is directly written by the Company and is substantially ceded to its parent, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (HLA).

The Company derives its revenues principally from: (a) fee income, including asset management fees on separate account and mortality and expense fees, as well as cost of insurance charges; (b) fully insured premiums; (c) certain other fees; and (d) net investment income on general account assets. Asset management fees and mortality and expense fees are primarily generated from separate account assets, which are deposited with the Company through the sale of variable annuity and variable life products and mutual funds. Cost of insurance charges are assessed on the net amount at risk for investment-oriented life insurance products. Premium revenues are derived primarily from the sale of group life and group disability insurance products.

The Company’s expenses essentially consist of interest credited to policyholders on general account liabilities, insurance benefits provided, dividends to policyholders, costs of selling and servicing the various products offered by the Company, and other general business expenses.

The Company’s profitability depends largely on the amount of assets under management, the level of fully insured premiums, the adequacy of product pricing and underwriting discipline, claims management and operating efficiencies, and its ability to earn target spreads between earned investment rates on general account assets and credited rates to customers. The level of assets under management is generally impacted by equity market performance, persistency of the in-force block of business, sales and other deposits, as well as any acquired blocks of business.

Operating Summary

10

Table of Contents

Hartford Life Insurance Company has the following reportable segments: Investment Products, Individual Life and Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI). The Company reports in “Other” corporate items not directly allocable to any of its segments, as well as certain group benefits, including group life and group disability insurance that is directly written by the Company and is substantially ceded to its parent, HLA. For information regarding the Company’s segments, see Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

On April 2, 2001, The Hartford acquired the United States individual life insurance, annuity and mutual fund businesses of Fortis. (For further discussion, see “Acquisitions” in the Capital Resources and Liquidity section and Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.) This transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, as such, the revenues and expenses generated by this business from April 2, 2001 forward are included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations.

2001 Compared to 2000 — Revenues increased $208, or 6%, primarily related to the growth across each of the Company’s primary operating segments, particularly the Individual Life segment, where revenues increased $229, or 42%. The revenue growth in the Individual Life segment was primarily due to higher earned fee income and net investment income resulting from the business acquired from Fortis. Revenues related to the Company’s Individual Annuity business were down $55 or 4%, primarily due to lower fee income as a result of the lower equity markets in 2001. Additionally, COLI revenues were below prior year due to a decrease in variable COLI sales and the declining block of leveraged COLI business.

Total expenses increased $43, or 1%, primarily associated with the growth in revenues discussed above. Net income increased $159, or 33%, led by the Individual Life where net income increased $36, or 51% primarily as the result of the business acquired from Fortis. In addition, the 2001 results include a $130 federal income tax benefit primarily related to separate account investment activity and a $9 charge associated with the impact of the September 11 terrorist attack. Additionally, 2000 results include a benefit of $32 also related to favorable tax items. Excluding these tax items and the impact of the September 11 terrorist attack, net income increased $70, or 15%, for the year ended December 31, 2001, as each of the Company’s operating segments experienced growth from a year ago.

2000 Compared to 1999 — Revenues increased slightly, primarily related to the growth in the Investment Products segment, due to higher fee income in the individual annuity operation as related average account values in 2000 were higher than 1999. Partially offsetting the growth in revenues was a decrease in COLI revenues primarily related to the declining block of leveraged COLI business.

Expenses decreased $79, or 3%, as increases in the Investment Products segment were more than offset by declines in the Company’s other operating segments, particularly the COLI segment where expenses decreased consistent with revenues. Net income increased $126, or 35%, led by the Investment Products segment where net income increased $54, or 18%. Hartford Life Insurance Company also recorded a benefit related to the settlement of certain federal tax matters of $24 in 2000. This benefit, along with an $8 benefit related to state income taxes, resulted in $32 of tax benefits for the year ended December 31, 2000. Additionally, net realized capital losses, after-tax, increased $55 due to portfolio rebalancing. Excluding the tax items and net realized capital losses, earnings increased $149, or 41%.

Outlook

Management believes that it has developed and implemented strategies to maintain and enhance its position as a market leader within the financial services industry and to continue the Company’s growth in assets. Hartford Life Insurance Company is well positioned to assist individuals in meeting their financial goals as they increasingly save and plan for retirement, protect themselves and their families against disability or death and prepare their estates for an efficient transfer of wealth between generations. Hartford Life Insurance Company’s strong market position in its primary businesses, which align with these growing markets, will provide opportunities to increase sales of the Company’s products and services.

Certain proposed legislative initiatives, which could impact Hartford Life Insurance Company are discussed in the Regulatory Matters and Contingencies section.

Segment Results

Below is a summary of net income (loss) by segment.

11

Table of Contents

A description of each segment as well as an analysis of the operating results summarized above is included on the following pages.

INVESTMENT PRODUCTS

Operating Summary

The Investment Products segment focuses on the savings and retirement needs of the growing number of individuals who are preparing for retirement or have already retired through the sale of individual variable and fixed annuities, mutual funds, retirement plan services and other investment products. The Company is both a leading writer of individual variable annuities and a top seller of individual variable annuities through banks in the United States.

2001 Compared to 2000 — Revenues in the Investment Products segment increased $46, or 2%, driven primarily by other investment products. Revenues from other investment products increased $101, or 16%, principally due to growth in net investment income. Net investment income in other investment products increased $110, or 20%, due mostly to growth in the institutional business, where account values were $9.1 billion at December 31, 2001, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 18%, from a year ago. The increase in revenues from other investment products was partially offset by individual annuity revenues, which decreased $55 or 4%. Fee income and net investment income from the individual annuity business acquired from Fortis helped to partially offset lower revenues in the individual annuity operation, which was primarily associated with decreased account values resulting from the lower equity markets as compared to the prior year.

Total expenses increased $25, or 1%, driven by higher interest credited and insurance operating expenses related to other investment products consistent with the revenue growth described above. Interest credited related to other investment products increased $78, or 18%. Also, individual annuity benefits and claims expenses increased $37, or 15%, principally due to the business acquired from Fortis and higher death benefits resulting from the lower equity markets in 2001. Individual annuity’s insurance operating costs increased $13, or 5% also due to the business acquired from Fortis. Partially offsetting the increase in benefits, claims, and insurance operating costs was a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of $64, or 13% resulting from the lower gross profits associated with the individual annuity business. In addition, income tax expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 was $111, a $39 or 26% decrease due to lower pretax operating income and the ongoing tax impact related to separate account investment activity.

Net income increased $21, or 6%. These increases were driven by the growth in revenues in other investment products described above, the favorable impact of Fortis and the lower effective tax rate related to the individual annuity business.

2000 Compared to 1999 — Revenues increased $184, or 10%, primarily due to higher fee income in the individual annuity operations. Fee income generated by individual annuities increased $175, or 16%, while related average account values grew $8.2 billion, or 10%, to $88.1 billion. The growth in average account values was due, in part, to strong sales of $10.7 billion in 2000, and the significant equity market performance in 1999, partially offset by surrenders. Although average individual annuity account values in 2000 were higher than 1999, account values at December 31, 2000 declined $1.7 billion, or 2%, as compared to December 31, 1999, as strong sales were not sufficient to offset surrenders and the impact of the retreating equity markets.

Due to the continued growth in this segment, expenses increased $130, or 8%. This increase was driven by amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and operating costs, which grew $66, or 16%, and $39, or 14%, respectively, primarily related to growth in the individual annuity operation.

Net income increased $54, or 18%, primarily due to the growth in revenues discussed above. Additionally, the Investment Products segment continued to maintain its profit margins related to its primary businesses, thus contributing to the segment’s earnings growth. In particular, its individual annuity operation’s operating expenses as a percentage of average individual annuity account values remained consistent with the prior year at 21 basis points.

Outlook

The market for retirement products continues to expand as individuals increasingly save and plan for retirement. Demographic trends suggest that as the “baby boom” generation matures, a significant portion of the United States population will allocate a greater

12

Table of Contents

percentage of their disposable income to saving for their retirement years due to uncertainty surrounding the Social Security system and increases in average life expectancy. As this market grows, particularly for variable annuities, new companies are continually entering the market, aggressively seeking distribution channels and pursuing market share. This trend is not expected to subside, particularly in light of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“the Financial Services Modernization Act”), which permits affiliations among banks, insurance companies and securities firms.

Management believes that it has developed and implemented strategies to maintain and enhance its position as a market leader in the financial services industry. For example, Hartford Life Insurance Company is introducing a tax advantaged college savings product (529 plan) in early 2002 called SMART 529. SMART 529 is a state-sponsored education savings program established by the State of West Virginia, which offers an easy way for both the residents of West Virginia and out-of-state participants to invest for a college education. SMART 529 will allow investors to choose from a wide variety of investment portfolios to match their risk preference to help investors accumulate savings for college. The SMART 529 product complements the Company’s existing offering of investment products (mutual funds, variable annuities, 401 (k), 457 and 403 (b) plans). It also leverages the Company’s capabilities in distribution, service and fund performance. The Company believes this is a significant market opportunity and the benefits of investing in 529 plans will be well received by many Americans saving for college.

INDIVIDUAL LIFE

Operating Summary

The Individual Life segment sells a variety of life insurance products, including variable life, universal life, interest sensitive whole life and term life insurance primarily to the high end estate and business planning markets. Additionally, the Fortis transaction, through the addition of a retail broker dealer, which has been renamed Woodbury Financial Services, Inc. has allowed the Individual Life segment to increase its reach in the emerging affluent market.

2001 Compared to 2000 — Revenues in the Individual Life segment increased $229, or 42%, primarily due to the business acquired from Fortis. Fee income, including cost of insurance charges, increased $161, or 41%, driven principally by growth in the variable life business. In addition, net investment income on general account business (universal life, interest sensitive whole life and term life) increased $62, or 44%, consistent with the growth in related account values.

Benefits, claims and expenses increased $177, or 41%, due principally to the growth in revenues described above. Although death benefits were higher in 2001 than the prior year as a result of the increase in life insurance in force, year-to-date mortality experience (expressed as death claims as a percentage of net amount at risk) for 2001 was within pricing assumptions.

Net income increased $36, or 51% primarily due to the revenue growth described above. Individual Life incurred an after-tax loss of $3 related to the September 11 terrorist attack. Excluding this loss, operating income increased $39, or 56%, primarily due to the growth factors described above.

2000 Compared to 1999 — Revenues decreased $29, or 5%, and expenses decreased $31, or 6%, primarily due to HLA’s December 1, 1999 recapture of an in force block of individual life insurance previously ceded to the Company. (For a discussion of the recapture, see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Excluding the recapture described above, revenues increased $58, or 12%. This increase in revenues is attributed to higher fee income associated with the growing block of variable life insurance. Fee income increased $58, or 17%, as variable life account values increased $352, or 14%, and variable life insurance in force increased $9.6 billion, or 40%.

Excluding the recapture described above, expenses increased $53, or 13%. The increase in expenses were primarily due to a $22, or 11%, increase in benefits, claims and claim adjustment expenses and a $13, or 11%, increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs mostly associated with the growth in this segment’s variable business. Additionally, insurance costs and other increased $15, or 19%, directly associated with the growth in this segment as previously described. Excluding the recapture described above, net income increased $5, or 8%, primarily due to higher fee income as mortality experience was consistent with prior year.

Outlook

Management believes that the Company’s strong market position will provide opportunities for growth in this segment as individuals increasingly focus on estate planning. The Hartford’s acquisition of the United States individual life insurance business of Fortis has increased its scale while broadening its distribution capabilities as described above.

13

Table of Contents

CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE (COLI)

Operating Summary

Hartford Life Insurance Company is a leader in the COLI market, which includes life insurance policies purchased by a company on the lives of its employees, with the company or a trust sponsored by the company named as beneficiary under the policy. Until the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPA Act of 1996”), the Company sold two principal types of COLI business, leveraged and variable products. Leveraged COLI is a fixed premium life insurance policy owned by a company or a trust sponsored by a company. The HIPA Act of 1996 phased out the deductibility of interest on policy loans under leveraged COLI through the end of 1998, virtually eliminating all future sales of this product. Variable COLI continues to be a product used by employers to fund non-qualified benefits or other postemployment benefit liabilities.

2001 Compared to 2000 — COLI revenues decreased $48, or 6%, mostly due to lower fee income and net investment income. Fee income and other decreased $34, or 8%, due to a decline in variable COLI sales and deposits which were approximately $1.5 billion in 2001 as compared to $2.9 billion in 2000. In addition, net investment income decreased $14, or 4% due primarily to lower interest rates, and the decline in leveraged COLI account values.

Benefits, claims and expenses decreased $47, or 7%, directly related to the decrease in revenue discussed above.

Net income increased $1 or 3% primarily due to the overall growth in variable COLI business and earnings associated with the leveraged COLI business recaptured in 1998. COLI incurred an after-tax charge of $2 related to the September 11 terrorist attack; excluding this charge, net income increased $3, or 9%.

2000 Compared to 1999 — Revenues in the COLI segment decreased $65, or 8%, due to a decline in net investment income of $65, or 15%. This decline was principally due to the leveraged COLI block of business, as related account values decreased $751, or 13%, as a result of the continued downsizing caused by the HIPA Act of 1996.

Expenses decreased $72, or 9%, primarily due to the factor described above. Net income increased $7, or 25%, principally due to the variable COLI business where related account values increased $3.6 billion, or 29%, as well as earnings associated with a block of leveraged COLI business recaptured in 1998.

Outlook

The focus of this segment is variable COLI, which continues to be a product generally used by employers to fund non-qualified benefits or other postemployment benefit liabilities. The leveraged COLI product has been an important contributor to Hartford Life Insurance Company’s profitability in recent years and will continue to contribute to the profitability of Hartford Life Insurance Company in the future, although the level of profit from leveraged COLI is expected to decline. COLI is subject to a changing legislative and regulatory environment that could have a material adverse effect on its business.

DEFERRED ACQUISITION COSTS (DAC) AND RESERVES

Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates include those used in determining deferred policy acquisition costs and the liability for future policyholder benefits and other policyholder funds. Although some variability is inherent in these estimates, management believes the amounts provided are adequate.

Deferred Acquisition Costs

Policy acquisition costs, which include commissions and certain other expenses that vary with and are primarily associated with acquiring business, are deferred and amortized over the estimated lives of the contracts, usually 20 years.

Deferred policy acquisition costs related to investment contracts and universal life type contracts are deferred and amortized using the retrospective deposit method. Under the retrospective deposit method, acquisition costs are amortized in proportion to the present

14

Table of Contents

value of expected gross profits from investment, mortality and expense margins and surrender charges. Actual gross profits can vary from management’s estimates, resulting in increases or decreases in the rate of amortization. Management periodically reviews these estimates and evaluates the recoverability of the deferred acquisition cost asset. When appropriate, management revises its assumptions on the estimated gross profits of these contracts and the cumulative amortization for the books of business are re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to income. The average rate of assumed future investment yield used in estimating expected gross profits related to variable annuity and variable life business was 9.0% at December 31, 2001 and for all other products including fixed annuities and other universal life type contracts the average assumed investment yield ranged from 5.0-8.5%.

Deferred policy acquisition costs related to traditional policies are amortized over the premium paying period of the related policies in proportion to the ratio of the present value of annual expected premium income to the present value of total expected premium income. Adjustments are made each year to recognize actual experience as compared to assumed experience for the current period.

To date, our experience has generally been consistent or favorable to the assumptions used in determining DAC amortization. However, if we were to experience a material adverse deviation in certain critical assumptions, including surrender rates, mortality experience, or investment performance, there could be a negative affect to the Company’s reported earnings and shareholder’s equity.

Reserves

In accordance with applicable insurance regulations under which Hartford Life Insurance Company operates, life insurance subsidiaries of the Company establish and carry as liabilities actuarially determined reserves which are calculated to meet their future obligations. Reserves for life insurance and disability contracts are based on actuarially recognized methods using prescribed morbidity and mortality tables in general use in the United States, which are modified to reflect the Company’s actual experience when appropriate. These reserves are computed at amounts that, with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates, are expected to be sufficient to meet the Company’s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured’s death. Reserves also include unearned premiums, premium deposits, claims incurred but not reported and claims reported but not yet paid. Reserves for assumed reinsurance are computed in a manner that is comparable to direct insurance reserves.

The liability for policy benefits for universal life-type contracts and interest-sensitive whole life policies is equal to the balance that accrues to the benefit of policyholders, including credited interest, amounts that have been assessed to compensate the Company for services to be performed over future periods, and any amounts previously assessed against policyholders that are refundable on termination of the contract. For investment contracts, policyholder liabilities are equal to the accumulated policy account values, which consist of an accumulation of deposit payments plus credited interest, less withdrawals and amounts assessed through the end of the period. For the Company’s group disability policies, the level of reserves is based on a variety of factors including particular diagnoses, termination rates and benefit levels.

The persistency of the Company’s annuity and other interest-sensitive life insurance reserves is enhanced by policy restrictions on the withdrawal of funds. Withdrawals in excess of allowable penalty-free amounts are assessed a surrender charge during a penalty period, which is usually at least seven years. Such surrender charge is initially a percentage of either the accumulation value or considerations received, which varies by product, and generally decreases gradually during the penalty period. Surrender charges are set at levels to protect the Company from loss on early terminations and to reduce the likelihood of policyholders terminating their policies during periods of increasing interest rates, thereby lengthening the effective duration of policy liabilities and improving the Company’s ability to maintain profitability on such policies.

INVESTMENTS

Hartford Life Insurance Company’s investments are managed by its investment strategy group which consists of a risk management unit and a portfolio management unit and reports directly to senior management of the Company. The risk management unit is responsible for monitoring and managing the Company’s asset/liability profile and establishing investment objectives and guidelines. The portfolio management unit is responsible for determining, within specified risk tolerances and investment guidelines, the appropriate asset allocation, duration, and convexity characteristics of the Company’s general account and guaranteed separate account investment portfolios. The Hartford Investment Management Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., executes the investment plan of the investment strategy group including the identification and purchase of securities that fulfill the objectives of the strategy group.

The primary investment objective of the Company’s general account is to maximize after-tax returns consistent with acceptable risk parameters (including the management of the interest rate sensitivity of invested assets relative to that of policyholder obligations) as discussed in the Capital Markets Risk Management section under “Market Risk — Interest Rate Risk”.

15

Table of Contents

The Company’s general account consists of a diversified portfolio of investments. Although all the assets of the general account support the Company’s general account liabilities, the Company’s investment strategy group has developed separate investment portfolios for specific classes of product liabilities within the general account. The strategy group works closely with the business lines to develop specific investment guidelines, including duration targets, asset allocation and convexity constraints, asset/liability mismatch tolerances and return objectives for each product line in order to achieve each product line’s individual risk and return objectives.

Invested assets in the Company’s general account totaled $23.6 billion as of December 31, 2001 and were comprised of $19.1 billion of fixed maturities, $3.3 billion of policy loans, equity securities of $64 and other investments of $1.1 billion. As of December 31, 2000, general account invested assets totaled $18.7 billion and were comprised of $14.3 billion of fixed maturities, $3.6 billion of policy loans, equity securities of $48 and other investments of $784. The decrease in policy loans was primarily due to the decline in leveraged COLI business (as discussed in the COLI section). Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life policy and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire in conjunction with the related policy liabilities. The increase in other investments primarily reflects an increase in limited partnership investments.

The following table sets forth by type the fixed maturity securities held in the Company’s general account as of December 31, 2001 and 2000.

During 2001, corporate and ABS fixed maturity investments increased due to the Fortis acquisition.

As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, approximately 22% and 25%, respectively, of the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio was invested in private placement securities (including 13% and 15% of Rule 144A offerings as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively). Private placement securities are generally less liquid than public securities. However, private placements generally have covenants designed to compensate for liquidity risk. Most of the private placement securities in the operation’s portfolio are rated by nationally recognized rating agencies. (For further discussion of the Company’s investment credit policies, see the Capital Markets Risk Management section under “Credit Risk”.)

Investment Results

The table below summarizes Hartford Life Insurance Company’s investment results.

2001 Compared to 2000 — Net investment income, excluding policy loan income, increased $170, or 17%. The increase was primarily due to income earned on the previously discussed increase in fixed maturity investments, partially offset by lower yields on fixed maturities in the third and fourth quarters of 2001. Yields on overall average invested assets were flat.

Net realized capital losses increased $6 compared to 2000. Included in 2001 net realized capital losses were write-downs for other than temporary impairments on fixed maturities of $93, including a $37 loss related to securities issued by Enron Corporation. Also

16

Table of Contents

included in net realized capital losses is a $10 loss recognized on the sale of the Company’s interest in an Argentine insurance joint venture, in addition to losses associated with the credit deterioration of certain investments in which the Company has an indirect economic interest. These losses were partially offset by gains from the sale of fixed maturities.

2000 Compared to 1999 — Net investment income, excluding policy loan income, increased $53, or 5%. The increase was primarily due to higher yields earned on the investment cash flow from operations and reinvestment of proceeds from sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities in a higher interest rate environment. Policy loan income decreased $86, or 22%, due to the decrease in leveraged COLI business. Yield on average invested assets increased to 7.1%, as a result of an increase in the policy loan weighted average interest rate to 8.5% in 2000 from 7.5% in 1999. Net realized capital losses increased $81 compared to 1999 primarily as a result of portfolio rebalancing in a higher interest rate environment.

Separate Account Products

Separate account products are those for which a separate investment and liability account is maintained on behalf of the policyholder. Separate accounts reflect two categories of risk assumption: non-guaranteed separate accounts totaling $104.2 billion and $104.1 billion as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, wherein the policyholder assumes substantially all the investment risk and reward, and guaranteed separate accounts totaling $10.1 billion and $9.6 billion as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, wherein Hartford Life Insurance Company contractually guarantees either a minimum return or account value to the policyholder. The primary investment objective of the Company’s guaranteed separate account is to maximize after-tax returns consistent with acceptable risk parameters (including the management of the interest rate sensitivity of invested assets relative to that of policyholder obligations) as discussed in the Capital Market Risk Management section under “Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk”.

Investment objectives for non-guaranteed separate accounts vary by fund type, as outlined in the applicable fund prospectus or separate account plan of operations. Non-guaranteed separate account products include variable annuities, variable life insurance contracts and variable COLI. Guaranteed separate account products primarily consist of modified guaranteed individual annuities and modified guaranteed life insurance and generally include market value adjustment features and surrender charges to mitigate the risk of disintermediation.

CAPITAL MARKETS RISK MANAGEMENT

Hartford Life Insurance Company is exposed to two primary sources of investment risk and asset/liability management risk: credit risk, relating to the uncertainty associated with an obligor’s continued ability to make timely payment of principal and/or interest, and market risk, relating to the market price and/or cash flow variability associated with changes in interest rates, security prices, market indices, yield curves or currency exchange rates. The Company does not hold any financial instruments purchased for trading purposes. The following discussion identifies the Company’s policies and procedures for managing these risks and monitoring the results of the Company’s risk management activities.

Credit Risk

Hartford Life Insurance Company has established investment credit policies that focus on the credit quality of obligors and counterparties, limit credit concentrations, encourage diversification and require frequent creditworthiness reviews. Investment activity, including setting of policy and defining acceptable risk levels, is subject to regular review and approval by senior management.

The Company invests primarily in securities which are rated investment grade and has established exposure limits, diversification standards and review procedures for all credit risks including borrower, issuer and counterparty. Creditworthiness of specific obligors is determined by an internal credit evaluation supplemented by consideration of external determinants of creditworthiness, typically ratings assigned by nationally recognized ratings agencies. Obligor, asset sector and industry concentrations are subject to established limits and monitored on a regular interval.

The Company’s derivatives counterparty exposure policy establishes market-based credit limits, favors long-term financial stability and creditworthiness, and typically requires credit enhancement/credit risk reducing agreements. Credit risk is measured as the amount owed to the Company based on current market conditions and potential payment obligations between the Company and its counterparties. Credit exposures are generally quantified weekly and netted, and collateral is pledged to and held by, or on behalf of, the Company to the extent the current value of derivatives exceeds exposure policy thresholds.

Hartford Life Insurance Company is not exposed to any significant credit concentration risk of a single issuer.

The following table identifies fixed maturity securities, including guaranteed separate accounts, for the Company’s operations by credit quality. The ratings referenced in the tables are based on the ratings of nationally recognized rating organizations or, if not rated, assigned based on the Company’s internal analysis of such securities.

17

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, over 96% and 97%, respectively, of the fixed maturity portfolio was invested in securities rated investment grade (BBB and above). During 2001, the percentage of BBB rated fixed maturity investments increased due to the Fortis acquisition and the continued active management of the general account portfolios.

The Company also maintains credit policies regarding the financial stability and credit standing of its major derivatives’ counterparties and typically requires credit enhancement provisions to further reduce its credit risk. Credit risk for derivative contracts are limited to the amounts calculated to be due to the Company on such contracts based on current market conditions and potential payment obligations between the Company and its counterparties. Credit exposures are generally quantified weekly and netted. Collateral is pledged to and held by, or on behalf of, the Company to the extent the current value of derivatives exceeds exposure policy thresholds.

Market Risk

Hartford Life Insurance Company’s general and guaranteed separate account exposure to market risk relates to the market price and/or cash flow variability associated with changes in market interest rates. The following discussion focuses on the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk, asset/liability management strategies utilized to manage this risk, and characteristics of the Company’s insurance liabilities and their sensitivity to movements in interest rates.

Downward movement in market interest rates during 2001 resulted in a significant increase in the unrealized appreciation of the fixed maturity security portfolio from 2000. However, the Company’s asset allocation and its exposure to market risk as of December 31, 2001 have not changed materially from its position at December 31, 2000.

Derivative Instruments

Hartford Life Insurance Company utilizes a variety of derivative instruments, including swaps, caps, floors, forwards and exchange traded futures and options, in compliance with Company policy and regulatory requirements in order to achieve one of three Company approved objectives: to hedge risk arising from interest rate, price or currency exchange rate volatility; to manage liquidity; or to control transaction costs. The Company does not make a market or trade derivatives for the express purpose of earning trading profits.

Interest rate swaps involve the periodic exchange of payments with other parties, at specified intervals, calculated using the agreed upon rates and notional principal amounts. Generally, no cash is exchanged at the inception of the contract and no principal payments are exchanged. Typically, at the time a swap is entered into, the cash flow streams exchanged by the counterparties are equal in value.

Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed exchange rate. There is also periodic exchange of payments at specified intervals calculated using the agreed upon rates and exchanged principal amounts.

Interest rate cap and floor contracts entitle the purchaser to receive from the issuer at specified dates, the amount, if any, by which a specified market rate exceeds the cap strike rate or falls below the floor strike rate, applied to a notional principal amount. A premium payment is made by the purchaser of the contract at its inception, and no principal payments are exchanged.

Forward contracts are customized commitments to either purchase or sell designated financial instruments, at a future date, for a specified price and may be settled in cash or through delivery of the underlying instrument.

Financial futures are standardized commitments to either purchase or sell designated financial instruments, at a future date, for a specified price and may be settled in cash or through delivery of the underlying instrument. Futures contracts trade on organized exchanges. Margin requirements for futures are met by pledging securities, and changes in the futures’ contract values are settled daily in cash.

Option contracts grant the purchaser, for a premium payment, the right to either purchase from or sell to the issuer a financial instrument at a specified price, within a specified period or on a stated date.

18

Table of Contents

The Company uses derivative instruments in its management of market risk consistent with four risk management strategies: hedging anticipated transactions, hedging liability instruments, hedging invested assets and hedging portfolios of assets and/or liabilities. (For additional information on these strategies along with tables reflecting outstanding derivative instruments, see the Company’s discussion below.)

Derivative activities are monitored by an internal compliance unit, reviewed frequently by senior management and reported to the Hartford’s Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. The notional amounts of derivative contracts represent the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are not reflective of credit risk. Notional amounts pertaining to derivative instruments for both general and guaranteed separate accounts at December 31, 2001 and 2000 totaled $8.4 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively.

Interest Rate Risk

Changes in interest rates can potentially impact Hartford Life Insurance Company’s profitability. Under certain circumstances of interest rate volatility, the Company could be exposed to disintermediation risk and reduction in net interest rate spread or profit margins. The Company analyzes interest rate risk using various models including multi-scenario cash flow projection models that forecast cash flows of the liabilities and their supporting investments, including derivative instruments. For non-guaranteed separate accounts, the Company’s exposure is not significant, as the policyholder assumes substantially all the investment risk.

The Company’s general account and guaranteed separate account investment portfolios primarily consist of investment grade, fixed maturity securities, including corporate bonds, asset backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage backed securities. The fair value of these and the Company’s other invested assets fluctuates depending on the interest rate environment and other general economic conditions. During periods of declining interest rates, paydowns on mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations increase as the underlying mortgages are prepaid. During such periods, the Company generally will not be able to reinvest the proceeds of any such prepayments at comparable yields. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the rate of prepayments generally declines, exposing the Company to the possibility of asset/liability cash flow and yield mismatch. For a discussion of the Company’s risk management techniques to manage this market risk, see “Asset/Liability Management Strategies Used to Manage Market Risk” below.

As described above, the Company holds a significant fixed maturity portfolio, which includes both fixed and variable rate features. The following table reflects the principal amounts of the general and guaranteed separate account fixed and variable rate fixed maturity portfolios, along with the respective weighted average coupons by estimated maturity year as of December 31, 2001. Comparative totals are included for December 31, 2000. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities due to call or prepayment provisions. The weighted average coupon on variable rate securities is based on spot rates as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and is primarily based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Callable bonds and notes are distributed to either call dates or maturity, depending on which date produces the most conservative yield. Asset backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage backed securities are distributed based on estimates of the rate of future prepayments of principal over the remaining life of the securities. These estimates are developed using prepayment speeds provided in broker consensus data. Such estimates are derived from prepayment speeds previously experienced at the interest rate levels projected for the underlying collateral. Actual prepayment experience may vary from these estimates. Financial instruments with certain leverage features have been included in each of the fixed maturity categories. These instruments have not been separately displayed because they were immaterial to the Company’s investment portfolio.

19

Table of Contents