Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2002

Commission File Number: 0-23574


PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)

Delaware
(Sate or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
  33-0479906
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

9125 Rehco Road, San Diego, California 92121
(Address, Including Zip Code, of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(858) 453-7845

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $. 001 par value
(Title of Class)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o    No ý

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K: ý

        As of April 12, 2002, there were outstanding 57,271,673 shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.001 par value. As of that date, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $472.5 million. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person or group who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

        Documents Incorporated By Reference: Certain exhibits filed with the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-75830), as amended, and Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration Statement No. 333-84474) are incorporated herein by reference into Part IV of this Form 10-K.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
    PART I    

Item 1.

 

Business

 

1

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

14

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

15

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

15

 

 

PART II

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

 

16

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

17

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

20

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

31

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

32

Item 9.

 

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

32

 

 

PART III

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

33

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

36

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

43

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

45

 

 

PART IV

 

 

Item 14.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

 

47

Signatures

 

50

Financial Statements

 

F-1

Exhibit Index

 

 


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

        We are a leading pet food and supplies specialty retailer with 561 stores in 41 states and the District of Columbia. Our products include pet food, supplies, grooming products, toys, novelty items and vitamins, small pets such as fish, birds and other small animals (excluding cats and dogs), and veterinary supplies. Our strategy is to offer our customers a complete assortment of pet-related products at competitive prices, with superior levels of customer service at convenient locations.

        Our stores combine the broad merchandise selection and everyday low prices of a pet supply warehouse store with the convenient location and knowledgeable customer service of a neighborhood pet supply store. We believe that this combination differentiates our stores and provides us with a competitive advantage. Our principal format is a 15,000 square foot superstore, conveniently located near local neighborhood shopping destinations, including supermarkets, bookstores, coffee shops, dry cleaners and video stores, where our target "pet parent" customer makes regular weekly shopping trips. We believe that our stores are well positioned, both in terms of product offerings and location, to benefit from favorable long-term demographic trends, a growing pet population and an increasing willingness of pet owners to spend on their pets.

        Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this Annual Report to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to January 31 of the following year. For example, references to fiscal 2001 refer to the fiscal year beginning on February 4, 2001 and ending on February 2, 2002. Adjusted EBITDA is defined in "Item 6—Selected Financial Data."

The Pet Food, Supply and Services Industry

        General.    We believe the pet food and supplies industry is benefiting from a number of favorable demographic trends that are continuing to support a steadily growing pet population. The U.S. pet population has now reached 353 million companion animals, including 141 million cats and dogs, with an estimated 62% of all U.S. households owning at least one pet, and three quarters of those households owning two or more pets. We believe the trend to more pets and more pet-owning households will continue, driven by an increasing number of children under 18 and a growing number of empty nesters whose pets have become their new "children." Based on U.S. Census Bureau data, the number of children under 18 will continue to grow over the next five years. We believe that this trend will continue to support the growing U.S. pet population, as households with these demographics are more likely to own pets. We estimate that U.S. retail sales of pet food, supplies, small animals (excluding cats and dogs) and services has increased to approximately $23 billion in 2001.

        Pet Food.    Packaged Facts projects that dog and cat food sales, which represent the vast majority of all pet food sales, will account for approximately $11 billion in sales for 2001. In 2000, sales of premium dog and cat food represented approximately 30% of the total dog and cat food market and is expected to increase to approximately 40% of the total dog and cat food market by 2005, representing a compounded annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 9.0%. Sales of dog and cat food accounted for $431 million, or 33%, of our fiscal 2001 net sales, of which $399 million, or 93%, was generated from premium dog and cat food sales.

        Historically, the pet food industry has been dominated by national supermarket brands such as Alpo, Kal Kan and Purina, which are primarily sold through grocery stores, supermarkets, convenience stores and mass merchants. In recent years, supermarkets' share of total pet food sales has steadily decreased as a result of competition from warehouse clubs, mass merchants and specialty pet store chains as well as the growing proportion of premium pet food sales. Premium pet foods, such as Science Diet, Nutro and Eukanuba, currently are not sold through supermarkets, warehouse clubs or

1



mass merchants due to manufacturers' restrictions but are sold primarily through specialty retailers like PETCO, veterinarians and farm and feed stores.

        The growth of the premium pet food market is attributable to both the marketing of premium brands by vendors and a heightened nutritional awareness among pet owners. For example, during 1998 premium pet food manufacturers launched approximately 250 new specialty food products, such as all-natural products and products for pets with sensitive skin and stomachs. Management expects expanded product offerings by premium pet food manufacturers to continue, and that distribution of these products primarily through specialty retailers will continue to draw customers away from supermarkets and mass merchants.

        Pet Supplies and Small Animals.    Packaged Facts projects that sales of pet supplies will account for approximately $6 billion in sales for 2001 and will grow at a CAGR of 7.2% over the next few years. Pet supplies and small animals (excluding cats and dogs) accounted for $827 million, or 64%, of our fiscal 2001 net sales.

        The market for pet supplies consists of items such as collars and leashes, cages and habitats, toys, treats, aquatic supplies, pet carriers, vitamins and supplements, and grooming and veterinary products. The channels of distribution for pet supplies are highly fragmented with products sold by many types of retailers, including supermarkets, warehouse clubs and other discounters, mass merchants, specialty pet store chains, direct mail and veterinarians. Specialty retailers such as PETCO, with wide assortments of pet supplies and higher levels of customer service, represent a growing channel for sales of pet supplies.

        The market for small animals (other than cats and dogs) includes sales of fish, birds, reptiles, rabbits, hamsters, mice and other small pets. Because of the overpopulation of cats and dogs and the controversial practices of some breeders, we have elected to limit our selection of animals to birds, fish, reptiles and other small animals. We do, however, participate in pet adoption programs for cats and dogs, which are administered through local animal welfare programs.

        Pet Services.    Certain routine pet services are estimated to account for the remaining $6 billion of the overall $23 billion market projected by management, but represented approximately 3% of our fiscal 2001 net sales. The market for pet services includes obedience training, grooming and other services. We offer obedience training in most of our stores, grooming in many of our stores and limited veterinary services, such as routine vaccinations, at a number of stores. Although services do not represent a significant portion of our net sales, we believe that offering selected pet services better serves our best customers and increases traffic flow in our stores.

        Distribution Channels.    The pet food and supplies industry is highly fragmented, with an estimated 9,000 independent pet supply stores operating in the United States. PETCO is one of only two national specialty retailers of pet food and supplies. Between 1991 and 1999, the last year for which data is available, specialty pet store chains such as PETCO experienced significant market share gains, largely at the expense of supermarkets. We believe that this shift primarily results from (1) the enhanced merchandising effort and product and services mix offered by specialty pet store chains and (2) the growing demand for premium pet food as nutritional awareness among the general population extends to pet owners and their pets.

Business Strategy

        Our strategy is to strengthen our position as the leading pet food and supplies specialty retailer by offering our customers a complete assortment of pet-related products at competitive prices with

2



superior levels of customer service at convenient locations. We intend to continue to pursue the following elements of our strategy:

3


Purchasing and Distribution

        Our centralized purchasing and distribution system minimizes the delivered cost of merchandise and maximizes the in-stock position of our stores. We currently operate three central and five regional distribution centers. The central distribution centers are located in Mira Loma, California; Dayton, New Jersey; and Joliet, Illinois. Bulk items for all stores are either shipped to regional distribution centers for redistribution or are sent directly to store locations. Manufacturers ship non-bulk supplies to the central distribution facilities which we then distribute either to regional centers or directly to store locations. We believe that our centralized distribution system enables our stores to maximize selling space by reducing necessary levels of safety stock carried in each store. We also provide order fulfillment services for our Internet customers through our three central distribution centers.

Marketing and Advertising

        Our marketing department creates and implements a wide variety of nationwide, regional and local advertising, direct marketing and sales promotion programs. These television, radio, circular and direct mail programs are designed to increase sales and consumer awareness of the PETCO brand name.

        In late 1997 we launched our P.A.L.S. customer loyalty program, which provides us with one of the largest databases of customer information in the industry with over 15 million P.A.L.S. cards issued to date. Our P.A.L.S. database is integrated with our POS system, allowing us to track purchasing activity and shopping habits of our P.A.L.S. cardholders. This allows us to effectively target customers with personalized direct mail or e-mail messages, to provide promotional offers directly related to past purchases and to adjust our products and services mix to more effectively cater to our customers' needs.

        Local store marketing activities are conducted on a regular basis in most stores. These marketing activities include store opening events, in-store pet adoptions, informational seminars, school field trips, pet photos, product demonstrations, pet fairs and a variety of other local contests or cross-promotion events.

4



Competition

        The pet food and supplies business is highly competitive. This competition can be categorized into three different segments: (1) supermarkets, warehouse clubs and mass merchants; (2) specialty pet store chains; and (3) traditional pet stores. Many of the premium pet food brands we offer, such as Nutro, Science Diet and Eukanuba, are not presently available to supermarkets, warehouse clubs or mass merchants due to manufacturers' restrictions. We believe that the principal competitive factors influencing our business are product selection and quality, convenient store locations, customer service and price. We believe that we compete effectively within our various geographic areas; however, some of our competitors are much larger in terms of sales volume and have access to greater capital and management resources than we do.

        One of our premium pet food vendors, The Iams Company, was purchased by Procter & Gamble in fiscal 1999. Through the end of fiscal 1999, Iams brand pet food was not widely available in supermarkets or mass merchants. In fiscal 2000, Procter & Gamble broadened the distribution of Iams to supermarkets and mass merchants across the country. The Eukanuba brand of pet food, which is also manufactured by The Iams Company, continues to be sold exclusively by specialty channels such as PETCO.

        The pet food and supplies industry has been characterized in recent years by the consolidation of a number of pet supply chains. This consolidation has been accomplished through the acquisition of independent pet stores by larger specialty pet supply chains and the acquisition of these larger chains by similar competitors. We believe this consolidation trend may have a positive impact on industry conditions as store capacity may be rationalized, both in existing and in new units.

Suppliers and Vendors

        We purchase most of our merchandise directly from specialty suppliers and manufacturers of national brands. We purchase the majority of our pet food products from three vendors: The Iams Company, Hill's Pet Products, Inc. (which produces Science Diet), and Nutro, Inc. Supplies of products from these vendors accounted for approximately 10%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of our net sales in fiscal 2000 and 9%, 10% and 8%, respectively, in fiscal 2001. While we do not maintain long-term supply contracts with any of our vendors, we believe that we enjoy a favorable and stable relationship with each of these vendors.

Information Systems

        We have invested significant resources in establishing a comprehensive integrated information system infrastructure, including approximately $50 million over the last three fiscal years to replace and upgrade our information systems. We have integrated all key functional areas that provide our management team with timely information on sales trends, inventory tracking and operational data at the individual store level. The system empowers regional, district and store managers to increase sales, to control inventory and to enhance customer satisfaction.

        Our in-store POS system tracks all sales by stockkeeping unit (SKU) using bar codes and allows management to compare current performance against historical performance and current year's budget on a daily basis. The information gathered by this system supports automatic replenishment of in-store inventory from our regional and central distribution centers and is integrated into product buying decisions. Store labor planning and visual presentation levels are supported by sales management information systems. We use Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) with selected suppliers for efficient transmittal of purchase orders, shipping notices and invoices. Management believes that the systems we have developed enable us to continue to improve customer service, operational efficiency and management's ability to monitor critical performance indicators. We continue to invest in supply chain

5



technologies, human resources management, financial planning tools and continued improvement to the POS systems located in all stores.

Internet Initiatives

        We believe the Internet offers opportunities to complement our "brick-and-mortar" stores and to increase our retail commerce and consumer brand awareness of our products. We operate the popular e-commerce site www.petco.com, which provides our customers with pet-related content, commerce and community via the Internet.

        On December 4, 2000, we acquired the Petopia.com web site, including software and hardware required to operate the web site, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.8 million. Formerly, we had a strategic alliance with, and owned an equity interest of approximately 17.6% in, Petopia.com, a comprehensive pet commerce Internet destination that launched in the summer of 1999. The operations of Petopia.com have been rationalized and fully integrated with our operations.

Trademarks and Licenses

        We have registered numerous service marks and trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We believe the PETCO trademark has become an important component in our merchandising and marketing strategy. We believe we have all licenses necessary to conduct our business.

Employees

        As of February 2, 2002, we employed approximately 12,900 associates, of whom approximately 6,300 were employed full-time. Approximately 92% of our employees were employed in stores or in direct field supervision, approximately 4% in distribution centers and approximately 4% in our corporate headquarters in San Diego. We are not party to any collective bargaining arrangements, and we believe our labor relations are generally good.

Regulation

        The transportation and sale of small animals is governed by various state and local regulations. To date, these regulations have not had a material effect on our business or operations. Our aquatics and small animal buyers and real estate department are responsible for compliance with these regulations. Prior to the opening of each store, our aquatics and small animal buyers and real estate department review the regulations of the relevant state and local governments. Our real estate department then ensures ongoing compliance by keeping abreast of industry publications and maintaining contacts with our aquatics and small animal suppliers and the appropriate regulatory agency within each relevant state and local government.

Certain Cautionary Statements

        Some statements in this Annual Report, including, but not limited to, "Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are not historical facts but rather reflect current expectations concerning future results and events. We generally identify forward-looking statements in this Annual Report using words like "believe," "intend," "target," "expect," "estimate," "may," "should," "plan," "project," "contemplate," "anticipate," "predict" or similar expressions. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity,

6



performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

If we are unable to profitably open and operate new stores and maintain the profitability of our existing stores, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed.

        One of our strategies is to open new stores by focusing on both existing markets and by targeting new geographic markets. We have opened approximately 40 to 60 stores per year (offset by closings and relocations of existing stores) between fiscal 1999 and fiscal 2001. We plan to increase our net store count by 35 to 45 stores per year and plan to target one or two new geographic markets per year.

        There can be no assurance that we will be able to open stores at this rate. The rate of our expansion will depend on several factors, including general economic and business conditions affecting consumer confidence and spending, the availability of desirable locations, the negotiation of acceptable lease terms, the availability of qualified personnel and our ability to manage the operational aspects of our growth. The rate of our expansion will also depend on the availability of adequate capital, which in turn will depend in large part on cash flow generated by our business and the availability of equity and debt capital. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain equity or debt capital on acceptable terms or at all. Moreover, our senior credit facility and the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes contain provisions that restrict the amount of debt we may incur in the future. If we are not successful in obtaining sufficient capital, we may be unable to open additional stores as planned, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

        Our continued growth also depends, to a significant degree, on our ability to increase sales in our new and existing stores. Our comparable store net sales increased by 11.1%, 6.4% and 8.6% for fiscal 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. As a result of new store openings in existing markets and because mature stores will represent an increasing proportion of our store base over time, our comparable store net sales increases in future periods may be lower than historical levels.

        There also can be no assurance that our existing stores will maintain their current levels of sales and profitability or that new stores will generate sales levels necessary to achieve store-level profitability, much less profitability comparable to that of existing stores. New stores that we open in our existing markets may draw customers from our existing stores and may have lower sales growth relative to stores opened in new markets. New stores also may face greater competition and have lower anticipated sales volumes relative to previously opened stores during their comparable years of operations. These factors, together with increased pre-opening expenses at our new stores, may reduce our average store contribution and operating margins. If we are unable to profitably open and operate new stores and maintain the profitability of our existing stores, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed.

We may be unable to successfully execute our expansion strategy or manage and sustain our growth and, as a result, our business may be harmed.

        Our ability to open new stores depends on a number of factors, including:

7


        Our senior credit facility and indenture also contain covenants which may restrict or impair our growth plans. We currently expect to finance our store expansion plans from cash flow from operations, lease financing and capacity under our senior credit facility. To the extent that we are unable to obtain adequate financing for new store growth on acceptable terms, our ability to open new stores will be negatively impacted. As a result, there can be no assurances that we will be able to achieve our current plans for the opening of new stores. In addition, our failure to expand our distribution facilities or other internal systems or procedures in accordance with our growth plans, or difficulties we may incur in operating our distribution facilities, could adversely affect our ability to deliver merchandise to our stores in a timely fashion. As a result, our ability to support our planned new store growth may be harmed.

        In addition, we routinely evaluate our strategic alternatives with respect to each of our stores and our other operating assets and investments. In connection with this evaluation, we may elect to close stores or to sell or otherwise dispose of selected assets or investments. Excluding store relocations, we closed 18 stores in fiscal 1999, 10 stores in fiscal 2000 and 6 stores in fiscal 2001. There can be no assurance that any future sale or disposition would be achieved on terms favorable to us because we incur closing costs or may lose sales to our competitors as a result.

Our substantial amount of debt may limit the cash flow available for our operations and place us at a competitive disadvantage.

        We have, and will continue to have, a substantial amount of debt. As of February 2, 2002, this debt consisted primarily of (1) $200.0 million in principal amount of our senior subordinated notes and (2) $194.5 million of borrowings under our senior credit facility (with $69.3 million of additional available credit, subject to certain conditions). Our level of indebtedness has important consequences. For example, our level of indebtedness may:


The agreements governing our debt impose restrictions on our business.

        The agreements governing our senior credit facility and the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes contain a number of covenants imposing significant restrictions on our business. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. These covenants place restrictions on our ability to, among other things:

8


        If compliance with our debt obligations materially hinders our ability to operate our business and adapt to changing industry conditions, we may lose market share, our revenue may decline and our operating results may suffer.

Our failure to satisfy covenants in our debt instruments will cause a default under those instruments.

        In addition to imposing restrictions on our business and operations, our debt instruments include a number of covenants relating to financial ratios and tests. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. The breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under these instruments. An event of default would permit our lenders to declare all amounts borrowed from them to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. Moreover, the lenders under our senior credit facility would have the option to terminate any obligation to make further extensions of credit under our senior credit facility. If we are unable to repay debt to our senior lenders, these lenders could proceed directly against our assets.

The loss of any of our three key vendors, or of our exclusive distribution arrangements with our vendors, would negatively impact our business.

        We purchase significant amounts of products from three key vendors: The Iams Company, Hill's Pet Products, Inc. (which produces Science Diet) and Nutro, Inc. Supplies of products from these vendors accounted for approximately 10%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of our net sales in fiscal 2000 and 9%, 10% and 8%, respectively, in fiscal 2001. We do not maintain long-term supply contracts with any of our vendors. While we believe that our vendor relationships are satisfactory, any vendor could discontinue selling to us at any time. The loss of any of our three key vendors or any other significant vendors of premium pet food or pet supplies offered by us would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        In addition, a change in how our key products are distributed could have a material adverse effect on our business. It could materially adversely affect our business if any premium pet food manufacturers were to make premium pet food products widely available in supermarkets or through mass merchants, or if the premium brands currently available to supermarkets and mass merchants were to increase their market share at the expense of the premium brands sold only through specialty pet food and supplies retailers.

        One of our primary premium pet food vendors, The Iams Company, was purchased by Procter & Gamble in fiscal 1999. Through the end of fiscal 1999, the premium pet food brands that we purchased from The Iams Company, Hill's Pet Products, Inc. and Nutro, Inc. were not widely available in supermarkets or mass merchants. In March 2000, Procter & Gamble broadened the distribution of the Iams brand to supermarkets, warehouse clubs and mass merchants across the country. The Eukanuba brand of pet food, which is also manufactured by The Iams Company, continues to be sold exclusively through specialty channels such as PETCO. Sales of Iams brand pet food represented approximately 9% of our net sales in fiscal 1999 and approximately 6% of our net sales in fiscal 2000 and have stabilized at approximately 5% of our net sales in fiscal 2001. The broadening of the distribution of Iams brand pet food negatively impacted our comparable store net sales during fiscal 2000, resulting in lower increases in comparable store net sales through the first quarter of 2001.

        Our principal vendors also currently provide us with certain incentives such as volume purchasing, trade discounts, cooperative advertising and market development funds. A reduction or discontinuance of these incentives would increase our costs and could reduce our profitability.

9



        We also purchase significant amounts of pet supplies from a number of vendors with limited supply capabilities. There can be no assurance that our current pet supply vendors will be able to accommodate our anticipated growth and expansion of our stores. We continually seek to expand our base of pet supply vendors and to identify new pet-related products. An inability of our existing vendors to provide products in a timely or cost-effective manner could impair our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competition in the markets in which we operate is strong and if we are unable to compete effectively, our ability to generate sales may suffer and our operating income and net earnings would decline.

        The pet food and supplies retailing industry is highly competitive. We compete with a number of specialty pet store chains and traditional pet stores. We also compete with supermarkets, warehouse clubs and mass merchants. Many of these competitors are larger and have access to greater capital and management resources than we do.

        There can be no assurance that in the future we will not face greater competition from national, regional and local retailers. In particular, if any of our major competitors seeks to gain or retain market share by reducing prices or by introducing additional products, we may be required to reduce prices on our key products in order to remain competitive, which may negatively impact our profitability.

A prolonged economic downturn could result in reduced sales and lower revenues and profitability.

        Purchases of pet-related supplies may be affected by prolonged, negative trends in the general economy that adversely affect consumer spending. Any reduction in consumer confidence or disposable income in general may affect companies in pet-related industries more significantly than companies in industries that rely less on discretionary consumer spending. In addition, due to our substantial amount of debt and relatively limited amount of cash and cash equivalents, we are more susceptible to some of these adverse economic effects than are some of our competitors which have greater financial and other resources than we do.

Our operating results could be harmed if we are unable to integrate acquired companies into our operations.

        The pet food and supplies retailing industry is highly fragmented and has been characterized in recent years by consolidation. We may pursue expansion and acquisition opportunities in the future, and we must efficiently integrate and combine operations of acquired companies to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions. To be successful, the integration process requires us to achieve the benefits of combining the companies, including generating operating efficiencies and synergies and eliminating or reducing redundant costs. Since we often have limited prior knowledge of acquired companies, there can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions will be fully realized without incurring unanticipated costs or diverting management's attention from our core operations. Our operating results could be harmed if we are unable to efficiently integrate newly acquired companies into our operations. Any future acquisitions also could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, or the incurrence of additional debt or the assumption of contingent liabilities.

We have made investments in the past and may make investments in the future without being able to achieve an adequate return, if any, on our investment.

        In the past we have made, and in the future we may make, investments in strategic ventures or other complementary businesses in an effort to expand internationally or to otherwise grow our business. These investments typically involve many of the same risks posed by acquisitions, particularly those risks associated with the diversion of our resources, the inability of the new venture to generate sufficient revenues, the management of relationships with third parties and potential expenses. Strategic ventures have the added risk that the other strategic venture partners may have economic, business or

10



legal interests or objectives that are inconsistent with our interests and objectives. Although we have no present plans to make any such investment, there can be no assurances that any investment we make in the future would achieve an adequate return, if any, on our investment.

        In the past we have terminated, and in the future we may terminate, our relationship in a strategic venture after we have made substantial investments in that strategic venture. For example, our investment in Petopia.com, an e-commerce destination for the sale of pet food and supplies, failed to achieve the desired results, and in fiscal 2000 we took a charge of approximately $10.2 million due to Petopia.com's pending liquidation and wrote off $1.3 million in receivables due from Petopia.com. In addition, on January 28, 2002 we terminated our relationship with Canadian Petcetera Limited Partnership, which operates 32 Petcetera retail pet food and supplies stores in Canada, because the stores operated by the Canadian partnership were not producing the results we had anticipated. At the time of the termination of our relationship, we also entered into a settlement agreement with the other partners of the partnership to resolve allegations made by the other partners that we had reneged on an alleged agreement to buy out their interests in the Canadian partnership. See "Item 3—Legal Proceedings." We recorded a write-off of approximately $26.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2001 representing the carrying value of our Canadian investment and related assets and settlement expenses of approximately $10.3 million related to the settlement of the related dispute.

If we are required to restructure our operations to comply with regulations governing our business, it could have a material effect on our business and operations.

        The transportation and sale of small animals is governed by various state and local regulations. These laws vary from state to state and are enforced by the courts and by regulatory authorities with broad discretion. While we seek to structure our operations to comply with the laws and regulations of each state in which we operate, there can be no assurance that, given varying and uncertain interpretations of these laws, we would be found to be in compliance in all states. A determination that we are in violation of applicable laws in any state in which we operate could require us to restructure our operations to comply with the requirements of that state, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Some of our compensation practices have been challenged in a complaint that, if successful, could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

        In July 2001, we received a copy of a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The purported class of plaintiffs allege that we improperly classified our salaried store managers and assistant store managers as exempt employees not entitled to overtime pay for work in excess of 40 hours per week. The relief sought includes compensatory damages, penalties, preliminary and permanent injunctions requiring us to pay overtime compensation under California law, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys' fees and such other relief as the court deems proper. In November 2001, the case was transferred to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. We have answered the complaint and discovery has commenced. If successful, this litigation could harm our financial condition, and any required change in our labor practices could have a negative impact on our results of operations. See "Item 3—Legal Proceedings."

We depend on key personnel, and if we lose the services of any of our principal executive officers, including Mr. Devine, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, we may not be able to run our business effectively.

        We are dependent upon the efforts of our principal executive officers. In particular, we are dependent upon the management and leadership of Brian K. Devine, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of Mr. Devine or certain of our other principal executive officers could affect our ability to run our business effectively.

11



        Our success will depend on our ability to retain our current management and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management personnel is intense and there can be no assurances that we can retain our personnel. The loss of a member of senior management requires the remaining executive officers to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement. The inability to fill vacancies in our senior executive positions on a timely basis could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

Concentration of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

        As of April 12, 2002, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders owned, in the aggregate, approximately 64% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions, and will have significant control over our management and policies. The directors elected by these stockholders will be able to make decisions affecting our capital structure, including decisions to issue additional capital stock, implement stock repurchase programs and incur indebtedness. Prior to consummation of our initial public offering, Green Equity Investors III, L.P. and TPG Partners III, L.P. and its affiliates entered into an agreement, pursuant to which they have agreed to vote for two nominees of Green Equity Investors III, L.P. and two nominees of TPG Partners III, L.P. and its affiliates. This control may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers, delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in management, or limiting the ability of our other stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.

Future sales of shares of our common stock in the public market may depress our stock price and make it difficult for you to recover the full value of your investment in our shares.

        If our existing stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market or if there is a perception that these sales may occur, the market price of our common stock could decline. As of April 12, 2002, we had outstanding 57,271,673 shares of common stock. Of these shares, only the shares of common stock sold in our initial public offering will be freely tradable, without restriction, in the public market. After the lockup agreements pertaining to this offering expire 180 days from the date of the offering, unless waived, 40,596,673 additional shares will be eligible for sale in the public market at various times, subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The price of our common stock may be volatile.

        The price at which our common stock will trade may be volatile. The stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of securities. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of publicly traded companies. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company's securities, securities class-action litigation has often been brought against that company. If similar litigation were instituted against us, it could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources from our core business.

Terrorism and the uncertainty of war may have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

        Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred in New York and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001, and other acts of violence or war may affect the market on which our common stock trades, the markets in which we operate, our operations and profitability and your investment. Further terrorist attacks against the United States or U.S. businesses may occur. The potential near-term and long-term effect these attacks may have for our customers, the market for our common

12



stock, the markets for our services and the U.S. economy are uncertain. The consequences of any terrorist attacks, or any armed conflicts which may result, are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our business.

Our stock price may be adversely affected because our results of operations may fluctuate from quarter to quarter.

        The timing of new store openings, related pre-opening expenses and the amount of revenue contributed by new and existing stores may cause our quarterly results of operations to fluctuate. Our business is also subject to seasonal fluctuation. If our quarterly revenue and operating results fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, the market price of our common stock could fall substantially. Historically, we have realized a higher portion of our net sales during the month of December than during the other months of the year.

        Operating results also may vary depending on a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, including:

Takeover defense provisions may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

        Various provisions of the Delaware general corporation law, or the DGCL, and of our corporate governance documents may inhibit changes in control not approved by our board of directors and may have the effect of depriving you of an opportunity to receive a premium over the prevailing market price of our common stock in the event of an attempted hostile takeover. In addition, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. These provisions include:

        You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management's view only as of the date of this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances since this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

13




ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

        We lease substantially all of our store and warehouse locations. The original lease terms for our stores generally range from five to twenty years, with many of these leases containing renewal options. Leases on 142 stores expire within the next three years. Of these leases, 106 contain renewal options.

        Our headquarters, located in San Diego, California, consists of two facilities. We own an approximately 70,000 square foot facility and we lease an approximately 43,000 square foot facility. The owned San Diego facility is financed under an obligation which expires in February 2006. We also lease three central and five regional distribution centers. Our three central distribution centers collectively occupy approximately 800,000 square feet of space in Dayton, New Jersey; Joliet, Illinois; and Mira Loma, California under leases which expire in June 2002, April 2005 and September 2005, respectively. Our five regional distribution centers collectively occupy approximately 240,000 square feet of space in Stockton, California; Portland, Oregon; New Hope, Minnesota; Mansfield, Massachusetts; and Garland, Texas under leases which expire in April 2004, February 2007, September 2002, December 2003 and August 2004, respectively. Except with respect to the lease for our Portland, Oregon facility, all of our distribution center leases contain a renewal option.

        We design our stores to offer a fun, vibrant and enjoyable shopping experience for our customers and their pets. A typical PETCO store is moderately sized at 12,000 to 15,000 square feet, with low ceilings, attractive signage and bright lighting, resulting in a distinctive retail setting. Below is a table which lists, for our 561 stores at February 2, 2002, the number of stores by state:

Number of PETCO Stores
as of February 2, 2002

State
  Number of Stores
  State
  Number of Stores
Alabama   2   Mississippi   1
Arizona   15   Missouri   13
Arkansas   3   Montana   1
California   135   Nebraska   6
Colorado   12   Nevada   8
Connecticut   15   New Hampshire   6
Delaware   1   New Jersey   15
District of Columbia   1   New Mexico   3
Georgia   8   New York   33
Idaho   2   North Dakota   2
Illinois   38   Ohio   3
Indiana   6   Oregon   14
Iowa   6   Pennsylvania   23
Kansas   8   Rhode Island   1
Kentucky   1   South Dakota   1
Louisiana   2   Tennessee   7
Maine   1   Texas   49
Maryland   11   Utah   5
Massachusetts   24   Virginia   11
Michigan   14   Washington   26
Minnesota   18   Wisconsin   10

14



ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        In July 2001, two former employees instituted an action against us in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. The complaint in the action was filed, individually and on behalf of a purported class consisting of all current and former employees who worked as salaried managers or assistant managers in our stores in the state of California at any time between July 30, 1997 and the present. The complaint alleges that the individual plaintiffs and the purported class members worked hours for which they were entitled to receive, but did not receive, overtime compensation under California law, and that they were classified as "exempt" store management employees but were forced to work more than 50% of their time in non-exempt tasks. The complaint alleges violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The relief sought includes compensatory damages, penalties, preliminary and permanent injunctions requiring us to pay overtime compensation under California law, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys' fees and such other relief as the court deems proper. In November 2001, the case was transferred to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. We have answered the complaint and discovery has commenced. We intend to vigorously defend the action, including contesting the certification of the action as a class action. If successful, this litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, and any required change in our labor practices, could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

        On January 28, 2002, we settled a dispute regarding our investment in Canadian Petcetera Limited Partnership, which operates 32 Petcetera retail pet food and supplies stores in Canada, and terminated our relationship with the partnership. Under the terms of the settlement agreement (1) we transferred all of our interests in the Canadian partnership to an affiliate of Canadian Petcetera Warehouse Inc., the general partner of the partnership, (2) we paid the partnership $15.9 million in Canadian dollars, or approximately $10.3 million in U.S. dollars, (3) we agreed not to enter the Canadian marketplace for a two-year period and (4) we and the other partners released each other from any and all liability in connection with the operation of the Canadian partnership. In addition, the settlement provides that we have a right to the proceeds of any sale of the Canadian partnership or its assets within the next two years, subject to a maximum amount of $20.0 million in Canadian dollars, or approximately $12.4 million in U.S. dollars.

        From time to time we are involved in routine litigation and proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any other pending litigation matters that we believe would have a material adverse effect on us.


ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002.

15



PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

        Our common stock has been quoted on the National Market of The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "PETC" since our initial public offering in February 2002 and has not yet traded for a full quarterly period. Prior to this time, there was no public trading market for our shares of common stock.

        The last reported sale price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market's National Market on April 12, 2002 was $22.95. As of April 12, 2002, there were 57,271,673 shares of common stock outstanding that were held of record by approximately 120 stockholders.

Dividend Policy

        We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all available funds for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The agreements governing our senior credit facility and the indenture governing our 10.75% senior subordinated notes due 2011 also restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

        From February 4, 2001 through February 2, 2002, we granted options to purchase an aggregate of 882,376 shares of common stock to employees, directors and consultants under our 1994 stock option plan at exercise prices from $0.50 to $4.45. Additionally, during that period, an aggregate of 923,020 shares of common stock were purchased pursuant to the exercise of stock options. These transactions were effected under Rule 701 of the Securities Act. We did not issue and sell any other unregistered equity securities during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002.

        The recipients of securities in each such transaction represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates and other instruments issued in such transactions. All recipients either received adequate information about us or had access, through employment or other relationships, to such information. There were no underwriters employed in connection with the transactions described above.

Use of Proceeds

        Our initial public offering of common stock was effected through a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-75830) that was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2002. A total of 15,500,000 shares of common stock were registered on our behalf in this offering and an additional 1,175,000 shares were registered on behalf of certain selling stockholders. All 16,675,000 shares were sold at an initial public offering price of $19.00 per share, for an aggregate offering price of approximately $316.8 million, through a syndicate of underwriters managed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Deutsche Banc Securities Inc. (formerly Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown Inc.), Goldman, Sachs & Co., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Salomon Smith Barney Inc. The aggregate offering price of the shares we sold was $294.5 million and the aggregate offering price of shares sold by the selling stockholders was approximately $22.3 million.

16



        We paid approximately $19.9 million and the selling stockholders paid approximately $1.5 million to the underwriters for underwriting discounts and commissions in connection with the offering. In addition, we estimate that we incurred additional expenses of approximately $2.5 million in connection with the offering, which when added to the underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us, amounts to total estimated expenses of approximately $22.4 million. Thus, the net offering proceeds to us, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, were approximately $272.1 million. No offering expenses were paid directly or indirectly to any of our directors or officers (or their associates) or persons owning ten percent (10%) or more of any class of our equity securities or to any other affiliates.

        We used approximately $239.8 million of the net proceeds of our initial public offering to redeem in full 110,526 shares of series A preferred stock and 77,895 shares of series B preferred stock, representing all of our then outstanding shares of series A and series B preferred stock. Prior to the redemption, each of Green Equity Investors III., L.P., who we refer to as Leonard Green, and TPG Partners III, L.P. and its affiliates, who we refer to collectively as Texas Pacific Group, owned 51,081.5 shares of series A preferred stock and 36,000 shares of our series B preferred stock and Julian Day, one of our directors, owned 54 shares of series A preferred stock and 38 shares of series B preferred stock. As a result of their ownership of preferred stock, each of Leonard Green and Texas Pacific Group received approximately $110.8 million and Julian Day received approximately $0.1 million in connection with the preferred stock redemption. Leonard Green and Texas Pacific Group each currently own more than 10% of our common stock. We also used approximately $32.3 million of the net proceeds of our initial public offering plus approximately $2.2 million in cash-on-hand to repurchase $30.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our senior subordinated notes at 110.5% of their face amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the repurchase date.


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following selected consolidated financial data as of, and for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1998, January 30, 1999, January 29, 2000, February 3, 2001 and February 2, 2002, presented below under the captions "Statement of Operations Data" and "Balance Sheet Data," have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of those dates and for those periods. The selected historical consolidated financial data and notes should be read in conjunction with

17



"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements.

 
  Fiscal Year Ended
 
 
  Jan. 31,
1998

  Jan. 30,
1999

  Jan. 29,
2000

  Feb. 3,
2001(1)

  Feb. 2,
2002

 
 
  (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts, net sales per square foot and number of stores at period end)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                                
Net sales   $ 749,789   $ 839,622   $ 990,289   $ 1,151,178   $ 1,300,949  
Cost of sales and occupancy costs     553,566     624,818     720,711     817,084     909,186  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit     196,223     214,804     269,578     334,094     391,763  
Selling, general and administrative expenses     173,667     187,938     220,800     264,753     322,437  
Write-off of Canadian investment                     37,035  
Merger and non-recurring costs     38,693     22,963         55,928     445  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)     (16,137 )   3,903     48,778     13,413     31,846  
Interest expense, net     2,530     6,718     8,936     22,971     40,837  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) before Internet operations and equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliates, income taxes and extraordinary item     (18,667 )   (2,815 )   39,842     (9,558 )   (8,991 )
Internet operations and equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliates             (1,254 )   (4,543 )   (3,083 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary item     (18,667 )   (2,815 )   38,588     (14,101 )   (12,074 )
Income taxes (benefit)     (5,486 )   (438 )   16,831     4,974     (2,215 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item     (13,181 )   (2,377 )   21,757     (19,075 )   (9,859 )
Extraordinary item—loss on extinguishment of debt (net of income tax benefit)                 (1,264 )   (12,942 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss)     (13,181 )   (2,377 )   21,757     (20,339 )   (22,801 )
Increase in carrying amount of redeemable preferred stock                 (8,486 )   (27,745 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders   $ (13,181 ) $ (2,377 ) $ 21,757   $ (28,825 ) $ (50,546 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share   $ (0.01 ) $ (0.00 ) $ 0.02   $ (0.05 ) $ (1.32 )
Diluted earnings (loss) per share   $ (0.01 ) $ (0.00 ) $ 0.02   $ (0.05 ) $ (1.32 )
Shares used for computing basic earnings (loss) per share     908,424     927,212     928,136     632,162     38,429  
Shares used for computing diluted earnings (loss) per share     908,424