Back to GetFilings.com

Index

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Index

Index

Index

Index

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business

Associated Estates Realty Corporation (the "Company") is a self-administered and self-managed equity real estate investment trust ("REIT") which specializes in multifamily property management, advisory, development, acquisition, disposition, operation and ownership activities. The Company and its affiliates receive certain property and asset management fees, acquisition, disposition and incentive fees, consultation fees, and mortgage servicing fees. MIG II Realty Advisors, Inc. ("MIG"), a subsidiary of the Company, is a registered investment advisor and serves as a real estate advisor to pension funds. The Company owns three taxable REIT subsidiaries that provide management and other services for the Company and third parties. These corporations are referred to herein as "Service Companies."

As of March 31, 2005, the Company owns or property manages 110 apartment communities in twelve states consisting of 23,973 units. The Company owns, either directly or through subsidiaries, or holds ownership interests in 77 of the 110 apartment communities containing 18,170 units in ten states. Thirteen of those owned or partially owned apartment communities, consisting of 1,354 units, are Affordable Housing communities. The Company, or one of its subsidiaries, also property manages 33 communities consisting of 5,803 units. Additionally, the Company asset manages a 186-unit apartment community and one commercial property containing approximately 145,000 square feet. Effective April 1, 2005, the Company commenced management of four additional Affordable Housing properties located in Ohio containing 434 units for a third party owner.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared by the Company's management in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The reported results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and accompanying notes in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Stock Based Employee Compensation

The Company uses the intrinsic value method in accordance with the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 ("APB No. 25") to account for stock-based employee compensation arrangements. Under this method, the Company does not recognize compensation cost for stock options when the option exercise price equals or exceeds the market value of the common shares on the date of the grant. Restricted stock grants are recorded initially as a reduction to shareholders' equity and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting periods based upon the market value on the date of the grant. The amount of compensation recorded as a reduction to shareholders' equity related to restricted stock grants was $608,000 and $479,000 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. If the fair value method had been applied to the stock option grants as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the fair values of the options granted at the grant dates would be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting periods, and the Company's net (loss) income and earnings per share for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 would have been as follows:

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"). In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision of SFAS 123 which superceded the October 1995 issuance. This Statement also supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and its related implementation guidance. This Statement established standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. It does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in Statement 123 as originally issued. In April 2005, The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a rule which amended the compliance dates for this Statement. Accordingly, the Company will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2006. The Company is required to apply the provisions of this Statement using a modified version of prospective application. Under that transition method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the effective date for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered, based on the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS 123 as originally issued. These grant-date fair values had been included in the pro forma disclosures in the notes to the financial statements for periods prior to the effective date. Additionally, compensation cost will be recognized on all awards granted on or after the effective date over the related service period. The Company may elect to apply a modified version of retrospective application under which financial statements for periods prior to the effective date are adjusted on a basis consistent with the pro forma disclosures previously required for those periods. The Company expects that, upon adoption, it will not elect to adjust its financial statements for periods prior to the effective date. As a result of the adoption of this Statement, the Company expects to recognize compensation expense of approximately $70,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 related to awards outstanding as of March 31, 2005.

Classification of Fixed Asset Additions

The Company considers recurring fixed asset additions to a property to be capital expenditures made to replace worn out assets to maintain the property's value. The Company considers investment/revenue enhancing and/or non-recurring fixed assets to be capital expenditures if such improvements increase the value of the property and/or enable the Company to increase rents. The Company considers acquisition and development fixed asset additions to be for the purchase of, or construction of, new properties to be added to the Company's portfolio.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 financial statements to conform to the 2005 presentation.

2. ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES

On March 9, 2005 the Company acquired a 316-unit multifamily community located in Florida. The purchase was funded primarily by a first mortgage note on the acquired property and a first mortgage note on a previously unencumbered Market-Rate property (See Note 4 for further information concerning these mortgage notes).

3. SALE OF PROPERTIES

The Company reports, as discontinued operations, the results of operations and gain/loss related to the sale of real estate assets in accordance with SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." Real estate assets that are classified as held for sale are also reported as discontinued operations. The Company generally classifies properties as held for sale when all significant contingencies surrounding the closing have been resolved. In most transactions, these contingencies are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction. Interest expense included in discontinued operations is limited to interest on mortgage debt specifically associated with properties sold or classified as held for sale.

The Company had classified one property as held for sale at March 31, 2005. The major classes of assets and liabilities related to this property have been reclassified as such in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2005. The operating results for this property are included in "Discontinued operations" in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Additionally, the Company had classified one property as held for sale at March 31, 2004. The operating results for this property are included in discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This property was sold in May 2004.

The following chart summarizes "Income from discontinued operations" for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

⁽¹⁾ 2005 includes a $330,000 discount received as a result of prepaying a loan. (See Note 4).

4. DEBT

Mortgage Notes Payable

On February 1, 2005, the Company repaid $10.7 million in variable rate debt and prepaid $5.3 million in zero percent UDAG financing, both of which had been secured by a Market-Rate property. Of the $16.0 million that was repaid, $10.7 million matured on February 1, 2005, $3.1 million would have matured on April 1, 2005 and $2.2 million would have matured on June 1, 2006. The $2.2 million, that would have matured on June 1, 2006, was paid off at a discount of $330,000 that was recorded as a reduction to interest expense. The Company funded the repayment by obtaining a new loan on the same property in the amount of $16.1 million. The Company has the right to elect LIBOR plus 2.0% or the Prime Loan Rate as the interest rate from time to time on the new loan. This loan matures on February 1, 2007. The Company has two one-year options to extend this loan, each of which is conditioned upon achieving a satisfactory debt service coverage ratio at the property.

On March 9, 2005, the Company obtained two conventional mortgage loans in connection with the purchase of a property in Florida. One loan, secured by a property in Northeast Ohio, is in the amount of $9.9 million and matures in March 2006. The other loan, secured by the acquired Florida property, is in the amount of $29.1 million and matures in March 2007. The Company has the right to elect LIBOR plus 2.0% or the Prime Loan Rate as the interest rate from time to time in effect on both of these loans.

On March 21, 2005, the Company repaid a $15.6 million variable rate loan which had been secured by a property in Florida.

Lines of Credit

The Company has a $15.0 million secured line of credit with a maturity date of July 31, 2006. There were borrowings of $7.1 million and $10.0 million outstanding on this line of credit at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.5%.

The Company also has a $14.0 million line of credit. There were no regular borrowings outstanding under this line at March 31, 2005 or December 31, 2004. Approximately $1.6 million of this line of credit is reserved exclusively for derivative transactions. The remaining $12.4 million is available for regular borrowings and letter of credit transactions. Letters of credit issued against this line totaled $184,000 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at either the prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.0% at the Borrower's option. This line matures on December 31, 2005.

Unsecured Debt

On March 15, 2005, AERC Delaware Trust (the "Trust"), a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, sold trust preferred securities for an aggregate amount of $25.8 million. The Company owns all of the common securities of the Trust. The Trust used the proceeds to purchase the Company's junior subordinated note due March 30, 2035, which represents all of the Trust's assets. The terms of the trust preferred securities are substantially the same as the terms of the junior subordinated note. Interest on the junior subordinate note is payable at a fixed rate equal to 7.92% per annum through the interest rate payment date in March 2015 and thereafter at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum. The Company may redeem the junior subordinated note at par at any time on and after March 30, 2010. To the extent the Company redeems the junior subordinated note, the Trust is required to redeem a corresponding amount of trust preferred securities.

5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

MIG Realty Advisors, Inc. In June 1998, the Company recorded goodwill in connection with the MIG Realty Advisors, Inc. merger. The goodwill was allocated fully to the Management and Service Operations Segment.

The Company completed its annual review of goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2005. In performing this analysis, the Company uses a multiple of revenues to the range of potential alternatives and assigns a probability of the various alternatives under consideration by management. Based on its analysis, the Company determined that goodwill was not impaired as of March 31, 2005. There were no changes to the carrying amount of goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Should the estimates used to determine alternatives or the probabilities of the occurrence thereof change, an impairment may result which could materially impact the results of operations of the Company for the period in which it is recorded.

Intangible Assets

Property Acquisitions. In accordance with SFAS 141, "Business Combinations", the Company allocates a portion of the total purchase price of a property acquisition to any intangible assets identified, such as in-place leases and tenant relationships. The intangible assets are amortized over the remaining lease terms or estimated life of the tenant relationship, which is approximately twelve to sixteen months. Due to the short term nature of residential leases, the Company believes that existing lease rates approximate market rates, and therefore, no allocation is made for above/below market leases.

In connection with the March 2005 property acquisition discussed in Note 2, the Company recorded intangible assets in the amount of $975,000 related to in place leases, which will be amortized over thirteen months, and $282,000 related to tenant relationships, which will be amortized over sixteen months. These intangible assets have been fully allocated to the Acquisition/Disposition segment.

6. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES AND JOINT VENTURES

The Company provides management and other services to (and is reimbursed for certain expenses incurred on behalf of) certain non-owned properties in which the Company's Chief Executive Officer and/or other related parties have varying ownership interests. The entities which own these properties, as well as other related parties, are referred to as "affiliates." The Company or one of its subsidiaries or Service Companies also provides similar services to joint venture properties.

In the normal course of business, the Company has advanced funds on behalf of affiliates and joint ventures and holds funds for the benefit of affiliates and joint ventures.

The Company held two notes of equal amounts payable by its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") aggregating $3.4 million, both of which matured May 1, 2005. One of the notes was partially secured by 150,000 of the Company's common shares; the other note was unsecured. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the interest rate payable on these notes was approximately 4.4% and 3.1%, respectively. These notes were paid in full on April 25, 2005.

Merit Painting Services ("Merit"), a subsidiary of the Company, was retained by JAS Construction, Inc. ("JAS") under subcontracts for the performance of certain rehabilitation work at seven properties owned by an unrelated party. Work under these contracts was completed in late 2004. JAS is owned by a son of the Company's CEO. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, $28,000 and $1.8 million, respectively, of revenue in connection with these contracts and other JAS work was reported in painting services revenues in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Summarized affiliate and joint venture transaction activity was as follows:

⁽¹⁾ Primarily payroll and employee benefits, reimbursed at cost.

7. SHARES

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued 31,412 restricted common shares from treasury shares which vest in equal increments over three years from the date of grant. The Company's policy on the reissuance of treasury shares is to account for the issuance on the first-in first-out method. At March 31, 2005, the Company held 3,282,332 treasury shares at a cost of $29.1 million.

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share ("EPS") has been computed pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." There were 1.9 million and 1.8 million options to purchase common shares outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. None of the options were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the periods presented as their inclusion would be antidilutive to the net loss applicable to common shares from continuing operations.

The exchange of operating partnership minority interests into common shares was also not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the Company plans to settle these OP units in cash.

9. INTERIM SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company has four reportable segments: (1) Acquisition/Disposition Multifamily Properties; (2) Same Store Market-Rate ("Market-Rate") Multifamily Properties; (3) Affordable Housing Multifamily Properties; and (4) Management and Service Operations. The Company has identified these segments based upon how management makes decisions regarding resource allocation and performance assessment. The Acquisition/Disposition properties represent acquired or developed properties which have not yet reached stabilization (the Company considers a property stabilized when its occupancy rate reaches 93.0% or one year following the purchase or delivery of the final units, whichever occurs first), and properties that have been sold or are classified as held for sale in accordance with SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." The Market-Rate properties are same store conventional multifamily residential apartments. The Affordable Housing properties are multifamily properties for which the rents are subsidized and certain aspects of the operations are regulated by HUD pursuant to Section 8 of the National Housing Act of 1937. The Management and Service Operations provide management and advisory services to the Acquisition/Disposition, Market-Rate and Affordable Housing properties that are owned by the Company, as well as to clients and properties not owned by the Company. All of the Company's segments are located in the United States.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the "Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on Net Operating Income ("NOI"). NOI is determined by deducting property operating and maintenance expenses from total revenues (including interest income) for the Acquisition/Disposition (excluding amounts classified as discontinued operations), Market-Rate and Affordable Housing segments and deducting direct property management and service companies expenses and painting services expenses from total revenues for the Management and Service Operations segment. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure of its performance because it reflects the operating performance of its real estate portfolio and management and service companies at the property and management and service company level and is used to assess regional property level performance. NOI should not be considered (i) as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), (ii) as an indicator of the Company's financial performance, (iii) as cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) or (iv) as a measure of the Company's liquidity; nor is it necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of the Company's needs. Certain other real estate companies may define NOI in a different manner.

Information on the Company's segments for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

*Intersegment revenues and expenses have been eliminated in the computation of NOI for each of the segments.

*Intersegment revenues and expenses have been eliminated in the computation of NOI for each of the segments.

A reconciliation of total segment NOI to total consolidated net (loss) income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

10. CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims, including proceedings by government authorities (collectively "Litigation"). Litigation is subject to uncertainties and outcomes are difficult to predict. Consequently, the Company is unable to estimate ultimate aggregate monetary liability or financial impact with respect to the Litigation matters described in the following paragraphs as of March 31, 2005 and no accruals have been made for these matters. The Company believes that other Litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the Company after final disposition. However, because of the uncertainties of litigation, one or more lawsuits could ultimately result in a material obligation.

Pending Lawsuits

On August 10, 2001, Fluor Daniel, Inc. ("FDI") filed a Demand For Arbitration with the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") arising out of construction services provided by FDI to MIG/Orlando Development, LTD ("MOD"), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to a construction contract between FDI and MOD for the construction of a 460-unit apartment community located in Orlando, Florida. FDI claims that it suffered damages of $1.6 million in performing the work because of the owner's breach of the construction contract. Both MOD and the Company were named as party defendants in this litigation; however, during 2002, the Company was dismissed as a party to this litigation. MOD filed a counterclaim with the AAA against FDI seeking liquidated damages of $1.9 million arising out of FDI's failure to complete the project in a timely manner as required by the terms of the construction contract. MOD acquired this project in 1998 as part of the Company's acquisition of MIGRA from a group that included persons who were officers and directors of the Company, which group could have a material interest adverse to the Company because of indemnification obligations owing to the Company in connection with this litigation. The arbitration proceedings in this matter have been temporarily stayed pending a renewed mediation effort. Should such mediation efforts fail, the Company intends to vigorously defend this claim and pursue its counterclaim, but cannot predict the final outcome of this dispute.

On or about April 14, 2002, Melanie and Kyle Kopp commenced an action against the Company in the Franklin County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas seeking undetermined damages, injunctive relief and class action certification. This case arose out of the Company's Suredeposit program. This program allows cash short prospective residents to purchase a bond in lieu of paying a security deposit. The bond serves as a fund to pay those resident obligations that would otherwise have been funded by the security deposit. Plaintiffs allege that the non-refundable premium paid for the bond is a disguised form of security deposit, which is otherwise required to be refundable in accordance with Ohio's Landlord-Tenant Act. Plaintiffs further allege that certain pet deposits and other nonrefundable deposits required by the Company are similarly security deposits that must be refundable in accordance with Ohio's Landlord-Tenant Act. On or about January 15, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. The Company subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. Both motions are pending before the Court. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims.

On or about May 21, 2004, the Ohio Civil Rights Commission filed a lawsuit against a subsidiary of the Company in the Portage County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas. The complaint alleges violations of handicap design laws in connection with the development of the Village of Western Reserve property located in Streetsboro, Ohio. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, damages and attorneys fees. On February 25, 2005, the Company reached a tentative settlement with the plaintiff in this litigation, the results of which did not have a material impact on the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

Government Investigations

On or about August 7, 2002, the Maryland Attorney General served the Company with a subpoena seeking information concerning certain of the Company's leasing practices in connection with the Company's Maryland properties. The subpoena seeks extensive information going back a number of years, including information about the Company's Suredeposit programs and certain non-refundable deposits. The Company understands that other landlords operating in Maryland have been served with similar subpoenas. Presently, the Maryland Attorney General has not asserted any claims against the Company, however, the Company is aware of at least one instance where the Maryland Attorney General brought an action against another landlord operating multifamily properties in Maryland alleging that such landlord was engaging in leasing practices contrary to applicable law. The Company is attempting to cooperate with the Maryland Attorney General.

On or about December 22, 2003, the Montgomery County, Maryland Office of Landlord Tenant Affairs commenced an investigation into possible violations of state and county Landlord-Tenant laws involving two properties operated by the Company located in Montgomery County, Maryland. The matters being investigated are for the most part the same leasing practices being investigated by the Maryland Attorney General. The Company is attempting to cooperate with the County.

11. GUARANTEES

The Company has guaranteed the payment of 50.0% of the balance or approximately $12.4 million at March 31, 2005, of the loan in connection with Idlewylde Apartments Phase II, a 535-unit multifamily community located in Atlanta, Georgia, which was developed by the Company and its pension fund joint venture partner. This loan matures December 10, 2005. The Company has recorded no liability in relation to this guarantee at March 31, 2005. In addition, the Company routinely guarantees mortgage debt of its wholly owned subsidiaries.

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Dividends Declared

On May 2, 2005, the Company paid a dividend of $0.17 per common share, which was declared on March 30, 2005 to shareholders of record on April 15, 2005.

Notes Receivable

On April 25, 2005, the Company's Chief Executive Officer repaid two notes of equal amounts aggregating $3.4 million which matured on May 1, 2005.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based on current judgments and current knowledge of management, which are subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from those projected. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements which speak only as of the dates of the document. These forward-looking statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "expects", "projects", "believes", "plans", "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that the Company's forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty, including without limitation the following:

• changes in economic conditions in the markets in which the Company owns and manages properties, including interest rates, the overall level of economic activity, the availability of consumer credit and mortgage financing, unemployment rates and other factors;

• risks of a lessening of demand for the multifamily units owned or managed by the Company;

• competition from other available multifamily units and change in market rental rates;

• increases in property and liability insurance costs;

• changes in government regulations affecting the Affordable Housing properties and other properties operated by the Company;

• changes in or termination of contracts relating to third party management and advisory business;

• inability to renew current Housing Assistance Payment ("HAP") contracts at existing rents;

• weather and other conditions that might adversely affect operating expenses;

• expenditures that cannot be anticipated such as utility rate and usage increases, unanticipated repairs, and real estate tax valuation reassessments or millage rate increases;

• inability of the Company to achieve anticipated reductions in operating expenses and increases in revenues;

• the results of litigation filed or to be filed against the Company;

• risks related to the Company's joint ventures;

• risks of personal injury claims and property damage related to mold claims because of diminished insurance coverage;

• risks associated with property acquisitions such as environmental liabilities, among others;

• changes in market conditions that may limit or prevent the Company from acquiring or selling properties; and

• risks related to the perception of residents and prospective residents as to the attractiveness, convenience and safety of the Company's properties or the neighborhoods in which they are located.

Overview. The Company is engaged primarily in the ownership and operation of multifamily residential units. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiaries provide asset and property management services to third party owners of multifamily residential units for which the Company is paid fees. Approximately 89.0% of the Company's consolidated revenues were generated from the leasing of the owned residential units for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Approximately 90.0% of the revenues generated by the owned properties during the three months ended March 31, 2005 are related to Market-Rate properties. The operating performance of the properties and cash flows from operations, particularly the Market-Rate properties, have been impacted by low mortgage rates, which have resulted in an increase in home purchases by existing and potential apartment residents and the overall weak economy and related unemployment rates in many of the Company's principal markets.

The Company's total rental revenue collections are impacted by a combination of rental rates, rent concessions and occupancy levels, which the Company attempts to adjust from time to time in order to maintain projected revenues. Indicators that the Company uses in measuring these factors include average economic occupancy, physical occupancy and net collected rent. These indicators are more fully described in the Results of Operations comparison.

2005 Expectations. The Company expects its 2005 performance to be driven by improvements in the Market-Rate portfolio. Although the Midwest markets have been slower to recover than originally expected, the Company continues to expect to increase net collected rents by 2.0% in its Midwest portfolio and 4.0% or better in all its other portfolios located outside the Midwest. The Company expects property operating margins to increase 1.0% for the year 2005 as compared to 2004. In the first quarter of 2005, operating expenses were negatively impacted by increased utility costs and an exceptionally cold winter. The Company believes that these higher than expected expenses are seasonal and not reflective of the Company's full year expectations.

Offsetting expected net operating income increases are anticipated declines in asset and property management fees, disposition fees, the net contribution from the Company's painting subsidiary and interest expense. Asset and property management fee and disposition fee reductions are attributable to the loss of certain advisory properties previously under management and associated disposition fees earned during 2004. The net contribution from the Company's painting subsidiary is expected to be approximately $1.3 million less than 2004. Painting operations have returned to a more normalized contribution as a result of certain contracts that were completed in 2004. Interest expense increases are the result of anticipated rising interest rates and its impact on the Company's floating rate debt and the issuance of the trust preferred securities in the first quarter. The Company plans to ultimately use the proceeds from the trust preferred securities to acquire properties. Furthermore, the Company plans to continue to execute its strategy of reducing its presence in the Midwest, selling properties in markets where it will not be growing or selling in markets where market conditions are such that the reinvestment of cash proceeds derived from a sale are expected to provide significantly greater return on equity and an increase in cash flow. Although the timing of any sales and acquisitions can influence our results, the Company does not expect this 2005 activity to materially change these results.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows and Liquidity. Significant sources and uses of cash in the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, are summarized as follows:

Cash Sources (Uses):

The Company's primary sources of liquidity are cash flow provided by operations and short term borrowings on its lines of credit. The decrease in cash provided by operations in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily due to changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable balances, in addition to increased property operating and maintenance expenses. Property operating and maintenance expenses are expected to increase approximately 2.0% across the portfolio for 2005 when compared to 2004.

The Company obtained cash from the following additional sources during 2005:

• $55.1 million in mortgage notes obtained;

• $25.8 million in unsecured debt obtained through issuance of trust preferred securities; and

• $277,000 in proceeds related to stock option exercises.

The Company utilized cash for the following purposes during 2005:

• $56.3 million to redeem Class A preferred shares (from the funds received in December 2004 through the offering of Class B preferred shares);

• $42.7 million in acquisition, recurring and investment capital additions;

• $33.0 million reduction in mortgage notes;

• $5.0 million in dividends and distributions paid;

• $2.9 million reduction in line of credit borrowings; and

• $1.2 million in debt procurement costs paid.

At March 31, 2005, the Company had a total of $7.1 million outstanding on its two secured lines of credit, and outstanding letters of credit of $184,000 leaving $20.1 million available for additional borrowings. The amount available for borrowing on the $15.0 million line of credit is based upon the operating performance for the previous twelve months of the property that secures this line of credit. At March 31, 2005, the entire $15 million was available for borrowing, less the $7.1 million outstanding balance.

In April 2005, the Company's Chief Executive Officer repaid two notes totaling $3.4 million, which were scheduled to mature May 1, 2005.

In October 2005, $13.7 million in variable rate mortgage notes will mature. The Company anticipates that it will be able to replace these notes with similar debt upon maturity.

The Company anticipates commitments of approximately $13.2 million fo