UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x Annual report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
o Transition report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number 0-28316
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware |
72-1252405 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
250 North American Court |
70363 |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (985) 851-3833
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant at February 28, 2001 was approximately $417,234,000.
The number of shares of the Registrant's common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding at February 28, 2001 was 36,245,585.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PAGE |
|
| PART I |
2 |
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties |
2 |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings |
9 |
Item 4. Submission of Matters To a Vote Of Security Holders |
9 |
Item 4A. Executive Officers of The Registrant |
10 |
| PART II |
11 |
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters |
11 |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data |
11 |
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12 |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
17 |
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
18 |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
43 |
| PART III |
44 |
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
44 |
Item 11. Executive Compensation |
44 |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
44 |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
44 |
| PART IV |
44 |
Item. 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
44 |
| SIGNATURES |
S-1 |
| FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE |
F-1 |
| EXHIBIT INDEX |
E-1 |
PART I
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties
General
We are a leading provider of marine support vessels to the oil
and gas industry in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea and Latin
America. The services provided by our diversified fleet include the
transportation of drilling materials, supplies and crews to drilling rigs and
other offshore facilities; towing drilling rigs and equipment from one location
to another; and support for the construction, installation and maintenance of
offshore facilities. Using our larger and more sophisticated vessels, we
also provide deepwater ROV (remotely operated vehicle) and well service support,
and support for the submarine telecom cable industry, including fiber optic
cable installation. We currently have a total fleet of 94 vessels,
including 54 supply vessels, 11 large capacity platform supply vessels, seven
large anchor handling, towing and supply vessels, 13 crew boats and nine
line-handling vessels.
Demand for our services is primarily affected by expenditures for oil and gas
exploration, development and production in the markets where we operate.
As a result of the low oil prices, oil and gas companies curtailed or deferred
exploration and development spending in 1998 and most of 1999.
Additionally, the entry of newly-built vessels into the market areas where we
operate contributed to an increased competitive environment, which also
depressed our day rates and utilization. We began to experience increases
in day rates and utilization in the fourth quarter of 1999 and throughout 2000,
primarily due to the increase in drilling activity and a reduced number of
vessels in the market partially caused by the stacking of vessels by some of our
competitors and us. Also contributing to the increased utilization of our
Gulf supply boats was reduced downtime for dry-docking and upgrade
projects.
The Industry
Marine support vessels primarily are used to transport equipment, supplies, and personnel to drilling rigs, to support the construction and operation of offshore oil and gas production platforms, as work platforms for offshore construction and platform maintenance and for towing services for drilling rigs and equipment. The principal types of vessels that we operate can be summarized as follows:
Supply Boats. Supply boats are
generally at least 150 feet in length and were constructed primarily for
operations on the outer continental shelf of the Gulf to serve drilling and
production facilities and support offshore construction and maintenance
work. Supply boats are differentiated from other types of vessels by cargo
flexibility and capacity. In addition to transporting deck cargo, such as
pipe or drummed materials, supply boats transport liquid mud, potable and
drilling water, diesel fuel, dry bulk cement and dry bulk mud.
Platform Supply Vessels. Platform supply
vessels, also known as PSVs, were constructed primarily for international and
deepwater operations. PSVs serve drilling and production facilities and
support offshore construction and maintenance work. They are
differentiated from other offshore support vessels by their larger deck space
and cargo handling capabilities. Utilizing space on and below deck, they
are used to transport supplies such as fuel, water, drilling fluids, equipment
and provisions. PSVs range in size from 150 feet to more than 275 feet and
are particularly suited for supporting large concentrations of offshore
production locations because of their large deck space and below deck
capacities.
Anchor Handling, Towing and Supply Vessels.
Anchor handling, towing and supply vessels, also known as AHTSs, are used to set
anchors for drilling rigs and tow mobile drilling rigs and equipment from one
location to another. In addition, these vessels can be used in limited
supply roles when they are not performing anchor handling and towing
services. They are characterized by large horsepower (generally averaging
approximately 12,000-15,000 brake horsepower, and up to 24,000 brake horsepower
for the most powerful North Sea Class AHTS vessels), shorter after decks and
special equipment such as towing winches.
Crew Boats. Crew boats are generally at least
100 feet in length and are used primarily for the transportation of personnel
and light cargo, including food and supplies, to and among drilling rigs,
production platforms and other offshore installations. Crew boats are
constructed from aluminum. As a result, they generally require less
maintenance and have a longer useful life without refurbishment than
steel-hulled supply boats. The majority of our crew boats are vessels
120-feet long and longer.
Line Handling Boats. Line handling boats are
generally outfitted with special equipment to assist tankers while they are
loading from single buoy mooring systems. These vessels support oil off-loading
operations from production facilities to tankers and transport supplies and
materials to and between deepwater platforms.
Market Areas
We operate primarily in the Gulf, North Sea and offshore Brazil. Financial data, including revenues, expenses, and assets by market area/operating segment are detailed in note 18 of our consolidated financial statements. Our primary market areas are summarized below.
Gulf of Mexico. Our vessels support exploration and development
activities in the Gulf as well as existing oil and gas production
platforms. Demand for our supply boats is primarily impacted by the level
of offshore oil and gas drilling activity. Drilling activity is influenced
by a number of factors, including primarily oil and gas prices and drilling
budgets of oil and gas companies. As a result, utilization and day rates
traditionally have had a close relationship to oil and gas prices and drilling
activity. Day rates and utilization rates in the Gulf have traditionally
been volatile as a result of fluctuations in oil and gas prices and drilling
activity.
We believe approximately 340 supply boats were in the Gulf fleet at the end of
2000. We estimate that approximately 40 to 50 of these vessels are
de-activated or stacked and would require substantial investment to return to
work. We experienced increases in day rates and fleet utilization in the Gulf
beginning in the fourth quarter of 1999, and continuing throughout 2000, due to
increased drilling activity and the tightening of the supply vessel market
caused by the stacking of vessels by some of our competitors and us. The
utilization of our Gulf fleet also improved because we completed all vessel
upgrade projects and had reduced downtime from vessel dry-dockings.
As of February 20, 2001, we had 41 supply boats and 12 crew boats operating in
the Gulf, excluding our ten stacked supply boats.
North Sea. The North Sea market area consists of offshore Norway,
Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany, Great Britain and Ireland, and the area west
of the Shetlands Islands. Historically, it has been the most demanding of
all offshore areas due to harsh weather, erratic sea conditions, significant
water depth and long sailing distances. Exploration and production operators in
the North Sea are typically large and well capitalized entities (such as major
oil companies and state owned oil companies), in large part because of the
significant financial commitment required in this market area. In
comparison to the Gulf, projects in the region tend to be fewer in number, but
larger in scope, with longer planning horizons and more long-term
contracts. Consequently, vessel demand in the North Sea is generally
slower to react to changes in energy prices and less susceptible to abrupt
swings than vessel demand in other regions. Activity in the North Sea
generally is at its highest level during the months from April to September and
at its lowest level during November to February.
We estimate that the number of vessels operating in the North Sea decreased from
approximately 230 in December 1999 to approximately 198 as of December 2000, due
primarily to the relocation of vessels to other international areas. As of
February 20, 2001, we had eleven PSVs and seven AHTSs in the North Sea.
Brazil. The primary customer in the Brazilian market is Petrobras,
the Brazilian national oil company. Since 1999, Brazil has permitted
foreign oil companies to participate in offshore oil and gas drilling and
production. Offshore exploration and production activity in Brazil is
concentrated in the deep water Campos Basin, located 60 to 100 miles from the
Brazilian coast. A number of fields in the Campos Basin are being produced using
floating production facilities. In addition, exploration activity has
expanded south to the Santos Basin approximately 100 miles southeast of the city
of Rio de Janeiro and to the northeastern and northern continental
shelves.
As of February 20, 2001, we had nine line-handling vessels, our SWATH crew boat
and two supply boats operating offshore Brazil. Eleven of our vessels
operating offshore Brazil are under charters with Petrobras.
Our Fleet
Existing Fleet. The following table sets forth information regarding the vessels owned by us as of February 28, 2001:
|
Type of Vessel |
No. of Vessels |
Length |
Horsepower |
|
Supply Boats |
54 |
166" - 230" |
1,950 - 6,000 |
|
PSVs |
11 |
176" - 276" |
4,050 - 10,800 |
|
AHTSs |
7 |
196" - 275" |
11,140 - 23,800 |
|
Crew/Line Handling Boats |
22(1) |
105" - 125" |
1,200 - 10,600 |
_____________
Includes the Stillwater River, our SWATH crew boat.
As of February 20, 2001, the average age of our vessels was 16 years. We believe
that our upgrade and refurbishment program, completed in the first half of 1999,
has significantly extended the service life of most of our Gulf supply boats.
Vessel Maintenance. We incur routine dry-dock inspection,
maintenance and repair costs under U.S. Coast Guard Regulations and to maintain
American Bureau of Shipping certification for our vessels. In addition to
complying with these requirements, we also have our own comprehensive vessel
maintenance program that we believe helps us to continue to provide our
customers with well maintained, reliable vessels. We incurred
approximately $24.2 million, $16.4 million and $7.7 million in dry-docking and
marine inspection costs for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and
2000, respectively.
Operations Bases
We support our operations in the Gulf from a 62.5 acre docking, maintenance and
office facility in Houma, Louisiana located on the intracoastal waterway that
provides direct access to the Gulf. We also lease a 3,600 square foot
office in Houston, Texas. Our North Sea operations are supported from
leased offices in Fosnavag, Norway, Kristiansand, Norway and Aberdeen,
Scotland. Our Brazilian operations are supported from a maintenance and
administrative facility in Macae, Brazil and a sales and administrative office
in Rio de Janeiro.
Customers and Charter Terms
We have entered into master service agreements with substantially all of the
major and independent oil companies operating in the Gulf. Most of our
charters in the Gulf are short-term contracts (60 to 90 days) or spot contracts
(less than 30 days) and are cancelable upon short notice. Because of
frequent renewals, the stated duration of charters frequently has little
relationship to the actual time vessels are chartered to a particular customer.
Our principal customers in the North Sea are major integrated oil companies and
large independent oil and gas companies as well as foreign government owned or
controlled companies that provide logistic, construction and other services to
such oil companies and foreign government organizations. The charters with
these customers are industry standard time charters. Current charters in
the North Sea include periods ranging from spot contracts of just a few days or
months to long-term contracts of several years. Seven of our North Sea
vessels are on long-term contracts (at least one year in duration). Any
charterer can, however, terminate its contract during the period upon payment of
agreed compensation. Our remaining North Sea vessels are chartered on a
short-term basis.
Charters are obtained through competitive bidding or, with certain customers,
through negotiation. The percentage of revenues attributable to an
individual customer varies from time to time, depending on the level of
exploration and development activities undertaken by a particular customer, the
availability and suitability of our vessels for the customer's projects, and
other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1999, and 2000, approximately 16% , 19%, and 10%,
respectively, of our total revenues were received from Statoil AS.
Competition
Our business is highly competitive. Competition in the marine support
services industry primarily involves factors such as price, service and
reputation of vessel operators and crews, and availability and quality of
vessels of the type and size needed by the customer. Although a few of our
competitors are larger and have greater financial resources and international
experience than us, we believe that our operating capabilities and reputation
enable us to compete effectively with other fleets in the market areas in which
we operate.
Regulation
Our operations are significantly affected by federal, state and local
regulation, as well as certain international conventions, private industry
organizations and laws and regulations in jurisdictions where our vessels
operate and are registered. These regulations govern worker health and
safety and the manning, construction and operation of vessels. For
example, we are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard, the
National Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Customs Service and the Maritime
Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, as well as private
industry organizations such as the American Bureau of Shipping. These
organizations establish safety criteria and are authorized to investigate vessel
accidents and recommend improved safety standards. Among the more
significant of the conventions applicable to our international operations are:
1) the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of the Sea,
1973, 1979 Protocol; 2) the International Convention on the Safety of Life
at Sea, 1974, 1978 and 1981/1983 Protocol; and 3) the International
Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for
Seafarers.
The U.S. Coast Guard regulates and enforces various aspects of marine offshore
vessel operations, such as classification, certification, routes, dry-docking
intervals, manning requirements, tonnage requirements and restrictions, hull and
shafting requirements and vessel documentation. Coast Guard regulations
require that each of our vessels be dry-docked for inspection at least twice
within a five-year period. We believe we are in compliance in all material
respects with all Coast Guard regulations.
Under the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, as amended, the privilege of transporting
merchandise or passengers in domestic waters extends only to vessels that are
owned by U.S. citizens and are built in and registered under the laws of the
U.S. A corporation is not considered a U.S. citizen unless, among other
things, no more than 25% of any class of its voting securities are owned by non-U.S.
citizens. If we should fail to comply with these requirements, during the
period of such noncompliance we would not be permitted to continue operating our
vessels in coastwise trade.
Our operations are also subject to a variety of federal and state statutes and
regulations regarding the discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relating to environmental protection. Included among these statutes
are the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"),
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"),
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act ("OCSLA") and the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 ("OPA").
The Clean Water Act imposes strict controls on the discharge of pollutants into
the navigable waters of the U.S., and imposes potential liability for the costs
of remediating releases of petroleum and other substances. The Clean Water
Act provides for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for any
unauthorized discharge of oil and other hazardous substances in reportable
quantities and imposes substantial potential liability for the costs of removal
and remediation. Many states have laws that are analogous to the Clean
Water Act and also require remediation of accidental releases of petroleum in
reportable quantities. Our vessels routinely transport diesel fuel to
offshore rigs and platforms, and also carry diesel fuel for their own use.
Our supply boats transport bulk chemical materials used in drilling activities,
and also transport liquid mud which contains oil and oil by-products. All
offshore companies operating in the U.S. are required to have vessel response
plans to deal with potential oil spills.
RCRA regulates the generation, transportation, storage, treatment and disposal
of onshore hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, and requires states to develop
programs to ensure the safe disposal of wastes. We generate non-hazardous
wastes and small quantities of hazardous wastes in connection with routine
operations. We believe that all of the wastes that we generate are handled
in compliance with RCRA and analogous state statutes.
CERCLA contains provisions dealing with remediation of releases of hazardous
substances into the environment and imposes strict, joint and several liability
for the costs of remediating environmental contamination upon owners and
operators of contaminated sites where the release occurred and those companies
who transport, dispose of or who arrange for disposal of hazardous substances
released at the sites. Although we handle hazardous substances in the
ordinary course of business, we are not aware of any hazardous substance
contamination for which we may be liable.
OCSLA provides the federal government with broad discretion in regulating the
release of offshore resources of oil and gas production. If the government
were to exercise its authority under OCSLA to restrict the availability of
offshore oil and gas leases, this could reduce demand for our Gulf vessels and
adversely affect utilization and day rates.
OPA contains provisions specifying responsibility for removal costs and damages
resulting from discharges of oil into navigable waters or onto the adjoining
shorelines. Among other requirements, OPA requires owners and operators of
vessels over 300 gross tons to provide the U.S. Coast Guard with evidence of
financial responsibility to cover the costs of cleaning up oil spills from such
vessels. We have provided satisfactory evidence of financial
responsibility to the U.S. Coast Guard for all of our Gulf vessels over 300
tons.
We believe we are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable
environmental laws and regulations to which we are subject. Our vessels
operating in foreign market areas are subject to regulatory controls concerning
environmental protection similar to those in force in the Gulf. We believe
that compliance with any existing environmental requirements will not materially affect our operations or competitive
position.
Insurance
The operation of our vessels is subject to various risks, such as catastrophic
marine disaster, adverse weather conditions, mechanical failure, collision and
navigation errors, all of which represent a threat to personnel safety and to
our vessels and cargo. We maintain insurance coverage against certain of
these risks, which management considers to be customary in the industry.
We believe that our insurance coverage is adequate and we have not experienced a
loss in excess of our policy limits. However, there can be no assurance
that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance at rates which we consider
commercially reasonable, nor can there be any assurance that such coverage will
be adequate to cover all claims that may arise.
Employees
As of February 20, 2001, we had 1,191 employees worldwide, including 1,087
operating personnel and 104 corporate, administrative and management
personnel. We believe our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.
To date, our operations have not been interrupted by strikes or work stoppages.
None of our U.S. employees is unionized or employed pursuant to any collective
bargaining agreement or any similar arrangement. We have experienced a
union organizing campaign for our Gulf employees by five maritime labor
unions. We, together with other providers of marine support vessels, have
been a target of the unions' efforts. An unfair labor practice charge
has been filed against us by the unions seeking an order that we permit their
organizers access to our properties. A similar prior charge was
withdrawn. If our Gulf employees were to become union represented, our
flexibility in dealing with changing circumstances in our industry or in our own
operations could be limited and we could be adversely
affected.
Our Norwegian seamen are covered by three union contracts that are between the
Norwegian Shipowners Association and three separate Norwegian unions. Our U.K. seamen are covered by
two union contracts between
Guernsey Ship Management Limited acting on our behalf and two separate
unions.
Cautionary Statements
Certain statements made in this Annual Report that are not historical facts are
"forward-looking statements." Such forward-looking statements may
include statements that relate to:
Also, you can generally identify forward-looking statements by
such terminology as "may," "will," "expect,"
"believe," "anticipate," "project,"
"estimate" or similar expressions. We caution you that such
statements are only predictions and not guarantees of future performance or
events. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various risk
factors, including but not limited to the risks listed below. These risk
factors may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements and the
projections on which the statements are based.
All phases of our operations are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and
other influences, many of which are beyond our control. Any one of such
influences, or a combination, could materially affect the results of our
operations and the accuracy of forward-looking statements made by us. Some
important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking
statements include the following:
Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or
predict. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update
the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report, whether as a
result of receiving new information, the occurrence of future events or
otherwise.
In addition to the other information in this Annual Report, the following
factors should be considered carefully.
Market volatility may adversely affect operations
Demand for our services depends heavily on activity in offshore oil and gas
exploration, development and production. The level of exploration and
development activity has traditionally been volatile as a result of fluctuations
in oil and natural gas prices and their uncertainty in the future. For
example, as a result of the decline in oil industry activity due to the
depressed oil prices experienced during 1998 and early 1999, day rates and
utilization of our supply boat fleet decreased dramatically. Although day
rates and utilization rates recovered in 2000 in response to increased industry
activity, we are unable to predict how long the recovery will
continue.
The North Sea market is also susceptible to changes in industry activity due to
energy price volatility. The use of long-term contracts in the North
Sea generally delays the reaction to fluctuations in energy prices.
However, a decline in the worldwide demand for oil and gas or
prolonged low oil or natural gas prices in the future could hinder the industry
recovery and depress offshore drilling and development activity. A
prolonged low level of activity in the Gulf and other areas where we operate is
likely to adversely affect the demand for our marine support services and our
financial condition and results of operations.
Charter rates for marine support vessels also depend on the supply of
vessels. Excess vessel capacity in the industry can result primarily from
the construction of new vessels and the mobilization of vessels between market
areas. During the last few years there has been a significant number of new
vessels built for use both in the Gulf and the North Sea. The addition of
new capacity to the worldwide offshore marine fleet has increased competition in
those markets where we operate. The addition of capacity coupled with a
prolonged period of low oil and gas prices in the future would likely
significantly increase competition and reduce day rates and utilization levels.
We operate in a highly competitive industry
Our business is highly competitive. Certain of our competitors have
significantly greater financial resources than us and more experience operating
in international areas. Competition in the marine support services industry
primarily involves factors such as price, service and reputation of vessel
operators and crews; and the quality and availability of vessels of the type and
size needed by the customer are also factors affecting the competitive
environment.
We expect in 2001 and beyond that operators of marine support vessels, including
us, will pursue the construction of new vessels in order to replace older
vessels and to participate in the growing deepwater exploration and development
market area. We believe that most fleet additions will be larger vessels that
have greater cargo capacity and more operating capabilities than the 180 to
200-foot supply boats built in the 1970s and early 1980s. Newly-built
vessels with enhanced capacities cost substantially more to build than
traditional supply boats and generally do not compete for the same
business. However, depending on market conditions, newly-built vessels can
at least temporarily increase competition and depress day rates and utilization
in the market areas where we operate.
Operating hazards may increase operating costs; limited insurance coverage
Marine support vessels are subject to operating risks such as catastrophic
marine disaster, adverse weather conditions, mechanical failure, collisions, oil
and hazardous substance spills and navigation errors. The occurrence of
any of these events may result in damage to or loss of our vessels and our
vessels' tow or cargo or other property and in injury to passengers and
personnel. Such occurrences may also result in a significant increase in
operating costs or liability to third parties. We maintain insurance
coverage against certain of these risks, which our management considers to be
customary in the industry. We cannot assure you, however, that we can
renew our existing insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates or that
such coverage will be adequate to cover future claims that may arise.
Compliance with governmental regulations may impose additional expenditures
Federal, state and local regulations, as well as certain international
conventions, private industry organizations and agencies and laws and
regulations in jurisdictions where our vessels operate and are registered,
materially affect our operations. These regulations govern worker health
and safety and the manning, construction and operation of vessels. These
organizations establish safety criteria and are authorized to investigate vessel
accidents and recommend approved safety standards. If we fail to comply
with the requirements of any of these laws or the rules or regulations of these
agencies and organizations, this could adversely affect our operations.
Our operations also are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
that control the discharge of pollutants into the environment and that otherwise
relate to environmental protection. While our insurance policies provide
coverage for accidental occurrence of seepage and pollution or clean up and
containment of the foregoing, pollution and similar environmental risks
generally are not fully insurable. We may incur substantial costs in
complying with such laws and regulations, and noncompliance can subject us to
substantial liabilities. The laws and regulations applicable to us and our
operations may change. If we violate any of such laws or regulations, this
could result in significant liability to us. In addition, any amendment to
such laws or regulations that mandates more stringent compliance standards would
likely cause an increase in our vessel maintenance expenses.
Seasonality may adversely affect operations
Our marine operations are seasonal and depend, in part, on weather
conditions. In the Gulf, we have historically enjoyed our highest
utilization rates during the second and third quarters, as mild weather provides
favorable conditions for offshore exploration, development and
construction. Adverse weather conditions during the winter months
generally curtail offshore development operations . Activity in the North
Sea is also subject to delays during periods of adverse weather, but is not
affected by seasonality to the extent activity in the Gulf is affected.
Accordingly, the results of any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of
annual results or continuing trends.
Age of fleet
The average age of our vessels (based on the date of construction) is
approximately 16 years. Expenditures required for the repair,
certification and maintenance of a vessel typically increase with vessel
age. These expenditures may increase to a level at which they are no
longer economically justifiable. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to maintain our fleet by extending the economic life of existing vessels through
major refurbishment or by acquiring new or used vessels.
Currency fluctuations could adversely affect results of operations
Changes in the value of foreign currencies relative to the United States dollar
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
In addition, transaction gains and losses could contribute to fluctuations in
our results of operations. Our international operations are subject to a
number of risks inherent to any business operating in foreign countries.
These risks include, among others:
All of these risks are beyond our control. We cannot predict
the nature and the likelihood of any such events. However, if such an event
should occur, it could significantly reduce our operating cash flows and
earnings.
We depend on key personnel
We depend on the continued services of our executive officers and other key
management personnel. If we were to lose any of these officers or other
management personnel, such a loss could adversely affect our operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various legal and other proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of our business. We do not believe that any of these proceedings, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. Submission of Matters To a Vote Of Security Holders
None.
Item 4A. Executive Officers of The Registrant
The name, age and offices held by each of the executive officers of the Company as of February 28, 2001, are as follows:
|
Name |
Age |
Position |
| Ronald O. Palmer | 54 | Chairman of the Board |
| Thomas E. Fairley | 53 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Victor M. Perez | 48 | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| Kenneth W. Bourgeois | 53 | Vice President and Controller |
| Michael D. Cain | 52 | Vice President, Marketing |
| Charles M. Hardy | 55 | Vice President, Domestic Operations |
| C. Douglas Stroud | 49 | Vice President, Business Development |
| Charles E. Tizzard | 50 | Vice President, Administration |
Ronald O. Palmer has been a director since October 1993 and Chairman of the Board since May 1997. Mr. Palmer also served as Executive Vice President from February 1995 to May 1997. Mr. Palmer joined Mr. Fairley in founding our predecessor company in 1980 and served as Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer until February 1995.
Thomas E. Fairley, who co-founded our predecessor company with Mr. Palmer in 1980, has been President and Chief Executive Officer and a director since October 1993. From October 1993 to May 1997, Mr. Fairley also served as our Chairman of the Board. Mr. Fairley is also a director of Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc., a leading marine fabricator.
Victor M. Perez has served as our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since February 1995.
Kenneth W. Bourgeois has served as our Vice President and Controller since October 1993. Mr. Bourgeois also served as the controller of our predecessor company from December 1981 to October 1993. Mr. Bourgeois is a Certified Public Accountant.
Michael D. Cain has served as our Vice President, Marketing since February 1993. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Cain served as Marketing Manager for our predecessor company.
Charles M. Hardy has served as our Vice President of Domestic Operations since July 2000. From May 1996 to July 2000, Mr. Hardy served as President of Offshore Towing, Inc. From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Hardy was employed by Tidewater Marine, Inc. as Vice President - Towing Division.
C. Douglas Stroud joined us in October 1998 and has served as our Vice President, Business Development since March 1999. Mr. Stroud was formerly with Ceanic Corporation (now Stolt Comex Seaway) from April 1997 to September 1998 as Vice President for Technical Sales, and from 1984 to 1997 as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Perry Tritech, Inc., a leading subsea robotic and remotely operated vehicle manufacturing company.
Charles E. Tizzard has served as our Vice President, Administration since June 1997. From October 1994 to June 1997, Mr. Tizzard served as Manager of Administration and Planning.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
Our common stock is listed for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "TMAR". At February 28, 2001, we had 90 holders of record of our common stock.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing sales prices of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market for the periods indicated .
|
1999 |
High |
Low |
| First quarter | $ 6.438 |
$4.250 |
| Second quarter | 8.625 |
4.500 |
| Third quarter | 9.813 |
5.875 |
| Fourth quarter | 8.875 |
6.313 |
|
2000 |
High |
Low |
| First quarter | $ 8.875 |
$ 5.063 |
| Second quarter | 13.000 |
6.688 |
| Third quarter | 17.125 |
9.375 |
| Fourth quarter | 19.325 |
12.000 |
|
2001 |
High |
Low |
| First quarter (through February 28, 2001) |
$ 17.875 |
$ 13.875 |
We do not plan to pay cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain all of the cash our business generates to meet our working capital requirements and fund future growth. In addition, our debt agreements prohibit us from paying dividends on our common stock.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data presented below for the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. You should read this information, together with the discussion under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements.
|
Year ended December 31, |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997(1) |
1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||
|
Revenues |
$ 132,887 |
$ 110,800 |
$ 186,245 |
$125,480 |
$ 53,484 |
|
Direct operating expenses and other |
88,101 |
92,578 |
91,214 |
50,693 |
29,835 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
33,419 |
32,919 |
29,528 |
12,734 |
4,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
$ 11,367 |
$ (14,697) |
$ 65,503 |
$ 62,053 |
$ 19,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary item |
$ (13,437) |
$ (31,580) |
$ 25,280 |
$ 35,299 |
$ 10,891 |
|
Extraordinary item, net of taxes |
715 |
(1,830) |
--- |
--- |
(917) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
$ (12,722) |
$ (33,410) |
$ 25,280 |
$ 35,299 |
$ 9,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Per Share Data:(2) |
|||||
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary item |
$ (0.41) |
$ (1.26) |
$ 1.20 |
$ 2.11 |
$ 0.88 |
|
Extraordinary item, net of taxes |
0.02 |
(0.07) |
--- |
--- |
(0.07) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
$ (0.39) |
$ (1.33) |
$ 1.20 |
$ 2.11 |
$ 0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|||||
|
Working capital (deficit) |
$ 28,763 |
$ (1,478) |
$ 9,358 |
$ 7,831 |
$ 10,753 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
$ 491,062 |
$ 553,388 |
$ 570,409 |
$ 505,056 |
$ 119,142 |
|
Total assets |
$ 678,122 |
$ 730,579 |
$ 768,890 |
$ 698,781 |
$ 144,035 |
|
Long term debt |
$ 320,682 |
$ 393,510 |
$ 402,518 |
$ 359,385 |
$ 21,000 |
|
Stockholders' equity |
$ 299,581 |
$ 270,108 |
$ 284,240 |
$ 261,500 |
$ 103,980 |
(1)
The data for 1997 reflects the results of our North Sea Operations for December 1997 only and the consolidation of it's assets and liabilities with those of the Company at December 31, 1997.(2)
Per share data has been adjusted to reflect a 3.0253-for-1 common stock split effective April 26, 1996 and a 100% stock dividend effective June 9, 1997.Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
We are a leading provider of marine support vessels to the oil and gas industry in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea and Latin America. We currently have a total fleet of 94 vessels, including 54 supply vessels, 11 large capacity platform supply vessels, seven large anchor handling, towing and supply vessels, 13 crew boats and nine line-handling vessels.
Our results of operations are affected primarily by day rates we receive and our fleet utilization. Demand for our vessels is primarily impacted by the level of offshore oil and gas drilling activity, which is primarily influenced by oil and gas prices and drilling budgets of oil and gas companies. As a result, trends in oil and gas prices can be expected to significantly affect our vessel utilization and day rates. Our day rates and utilization rates are also affected by the size, configuration and capabilities of our fleet. In the case of supply boats, PSVs and AHTSs, their deck space and liquid mud and dry bulk cement capacity are important attributes. In certain markets and for certain customers, horsepower and dynamic positioning systems are also important requirements. For crew boats, size and speed are important factors. Our day rates and utilization can also be affected by the supply of other vessels available in a given market area with similar configurations and capabilities.
Our operating costs primarily are a function of fleet size and utilization levels. The most significant direct operating costs are wages paid to vessel crews, maintenance and repairs and marine insurance. Generally, increases or decreases in vessel utilization only affect that portion of our direct operating costs that is incurred when the vessels are active. As a result, direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues may vary substantially due to changes in day rates and utilization.
In addition to these variable costs, we incur fixed charges related to the depreciation of our fleet and costs for the routine dry-dock inspection, maintenance and repair designed to ensure compliance with U.S. Coast Guard regulations and to maintain required certifications for our vessels. Maintenance and repair expense and marine inspection amortization charges are generally determined by the aggregate number of dry-dockings and other repairs undertaken in a given period. Costs incurred for dry-dock inspection and regulatory compliance are capitalized and amortized over the period between such dry-dockings, typically three to five years.
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth by vessel class, the average day rates and utilization for our vessels and the average number of vessels we owned during the periods indicated. We sold our six lift boats in the second quarter of 2000.
|
Year ended December 31, |
|||
|
|
|||
|
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average vessel day rates: |
|||
|
$ 4,273 |
$ 3,292 |
$ 6,844 |
|
9,888 |
10,049 |
14,604 |
|
2,502 |
1,914 |
2,056 |
|
Average vessel utilization rate: |
|||
|
72% |
59% |
62% |
|
82% |
85% |
95% |
|
81% |
83% |
94% |
|
Average number of vessels: |
|||
|
53.0 |
52.5 |
50.6 |
|
18.0 |
17.5 |
16.8 |
|
22.0 |
22.0 |
21.8 |
Set forth below is the internal allocation of our charter revenues and charter revenues less direct operating expenses among vessel classes for each of the periods indicated.
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Charter Revenues: |
2000 |
% |
1999 |
% |
1998 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 60,521 |
46% |
$ 36,920 |
34% |
$ 78,777 |
42% |
|
54,294 |
41% |
55,671 |
50% |
85,089 |
46% |
|
16,351 |
12% |
12,423 |
11% |
12,776 |
7% |
|
1,620 |
1% |
5,629 |
5% |
9,495 |
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 132,786 |
100% |
$ 110,643 |
100% |
$ 186,137 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
$ 27,607 | 42% |
$ 10,338 |
24% |
$ 47,299 |
41% |
|
31,423 |
48% |
30,053 |
69% |
60,115 |
53% |
|
6,835 | 10% |
2,052 |
5% |
3,101 |
3% |
|
(19) | -- |
954 |
2% |
3,813 |
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ 65,846 | 100% |
$ 43,397 |
100% |
$ 114,328 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2000 to the Year Ended December 31, 1999
Our revenues for 2000 were $132.9 million, an increase of 20.0%, compared to $110.8 million for 1999. The increase was due primarily to improved average day rates and utilization for our supply boat fleet in the Gulf resulting from increased drilling activity. Late in the third quarter of 1999, we began to experience increased utilization and day rates for our Gulf fleet. However, the North Sea, which was slower to decline in 1998 than the Gulf, did not experience any improvement until the second quarter of 2000.
Our average supply boat day rates in the Gulf increased 29.8% to $4,273 for 2000, compared to $3,292 for 1999. The average day rates for our fleet of crew boats and line handling vessels increased 30.7% to $2,502, compared to $1,914 during 1999.
Utilization for our Gulf supply boat fleet increased to 72% in 2000 from 59% in 1999. Utilization for the crew boats and line handling vessels decreased to 81% in 2000, compared to 83% in 1999, due to the dry-docking of a majority of our line-handling vessels in 2000, and the scheduled dry-docking of our SWATH vessel in Brazil.
Average day rates for our North Sea vessels in 2000, decreased 1.6 % to $9,888 compared to $10,049 for 1999. Our average day rate in the North Sea, as expressed in U.S. Dollars, was impacted by the Norwegian Kroner, which on average, depreciated by approximately 13% against the U.S. Dollar in 2000 compared to 1999. Vessel utilization was 82% for 2000, compared to 85% for 1999. As a result of low market day rates and utilization in 1999, we elected to de-activate two of our North Sea PSVs in the third quarter of 1999. A third PSV was de-activated in the fourth quarter of 1999. As a result of improving market conditions, we re-activated two of these three vessels late in the second quarter of 2000. The remaining vessel will be re-activated in the first quarter of 2001.
During 2000, direct vessel operating expenses were essentially unchanged at $67.4 million (50.7% of revenues), compared to $67.7 million (61.0% of revenues) for 1999. Direct vessel operating expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased in 2000 due primarily to the increase in utilization and average vessel day rates for our Gulf fleet.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $33.4 million for 2000, up from $32.9 million for 1999, due to the depreciation, for a full year, of two new vessels we placed into service in mid-1999. Amortization of marine inspection costs decreased to $13.8 million for 2000, from $13.9 million for 1999.
Our general and administrative expenses increased to $10.8 million (8.1% of revenues) in 2000, from $10.0 million (9.0% of revenues) for 1999 principally due to increases in salaries, benefits and professional fees associated with our international operations. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, decreased in 2000 due to the increase in utilization and average day rates for our Gulf fleet.
Interest expense decreased to $29.9 million during 2000 compared $32.0 million during 1999, due to the reduction of our debt in 2000.
In 2000, we had income tax benefit of $5.3 million, compared to income tax benefit of $15.8 million in 1999. Our effective income tax rate for 2000 was 28.4%. The variance from our statutory rate is due to income contributed by our Norwegian operations, which is deferred at the Norwegian statutory rate of 28%, as it is our intent to reinvest the unremitted earnings and postpone their repatriation indefinitely.
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 1999 to the Year Ended December 31, 1998
Our revenues for 1999 were $110.8 million, a decrease of 40.5%, compared to $186.2 million for 1998. This decrease was due to reduced average day rates and utilization for our vessel fleet as a result of reduced demand due to low oil prices. Day rates and utilization for our Gulf supply boats and North Sea PSVs were also impacted by increased competition from newly-built vessels entering the market. Late in the third quarter of 1999, we began to experience improvement in utilization and modest increases in day rates for our Gulf fleet.
Our average supply boat day rates in the Gulf decreased 51.9% to $3,292 for 1999, compared to $6,844 for 1998. Average day rates for our fleet of crew boats and line handling vessels decreased 6.9% to $1,914, compared to $2,056 during 1998.
Utilization for our Gulf supply boat fleet in 1999 was also impacted by the de-activation or "stacking" of 10 supply boats. Vessel downtime for dry-docking and refurbishment also impacted our supply boat utilization rates for both the 1999 and 1998 periods. Utilization for our Gulf supply boat fleet decreased to 59% in 1999 from 62% in 1998. Utilization for the crew boats and line handling vessels decreased to 83% in 1999, compared to 94% in 1998.
Average day rates for our North Sea vessels in 1999, decreased 31.3 % to $10,049 compared to $14,604 for 1998. Vessel utilization was 85% for 1999, compared to 95% for 1998. As a result of low market day rates and utilization, we elected to de-activate two of our North Sea PSVs in the third quarter of 1999. A third PSV was de-activated in the fourth quarter of 1999.
During 1999, direct vessel operating expenses decreased to $67.7 million (61.0% of revenues), compared to $72.3 million (38.8% of revenues) for 1998. Direct vessel operating expenses decreased in 1999 compared to 1998 due to cost reduction measures that we implemented and the de-activation of 10 supply vessels in the Gulf and three PSV's in the North Sea. The decrease in direct vessel operating expenses was partially offset by additional expenses associated with four new vessels that were placed into service in the last quarter of 1998 and the first half of 1999. Direct vessel operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased due primarily to the decrease in utilization and average vessel day rates for our vessel fleet.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $32.9 million for 1999, up from $29.5 million for 1998, due to our expanded vessel fleet in the Gulf, the North Sea and Brazil. Amortization of marine inspection costs increased to $13.9 million for 1999, from $8.9 million in 1998. This was primarily due to the amortization of increased dry-docking and marine inspection costs which we incurred in 1997 and 1998 due to our Gulf supply boat upgrade and refurbishment program.
Our general and administrative expenses decreased to $10.0 million (9.0% of revenues) in 1999, from $10.9 million (5.9% of revenues) for 1998, due to cost reduction measures we implemented. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, increased in 1999 due to the decrease in utilization and average day rates for our vessel fleet in 1999.
Interest expense increased to $32.0 million during 1999 compared to $27.7 million for 1998. This increase was due to increased borrowings in 1999 which were used to fund our vessel construction and vessel upgrade projects, our working capital requirements and higher average interest rates. Also, in 1998 we capitalized $3.3 million of interest because of our various vessel construction projects compared to $1.2 million of interest capitalized in 1999.
In 1999, we had income tax benefit of $15.8 million, compared to income tax expense of $11.8 million in 1998. Our effective income tax rate for 1999 was 33%. The variance from our statutory rate is due to income contributed by our Norwegian operations, which is deferred at the Norwegian statutory rate of 28%, as it is our intent to reinvest the unremitted earnings and postpone their repatriation indefinitely.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our on-going capital requirements arise primarily from our need to service debt, fund working capital, acquire, maintain or improve equipment and make other investments. Due to the reduction in industry activity, which occurred in 1998 and 1999, and the resulting decreases in day rates and utilization rates, we experienced a net loss during 1999 and the first nine months of 2000. As a result, our capital requirements during this period were primarily funded through the issuance of additional equity and the incurrence of debt.
During 1999, we completed vessel construction and upgrade projects that we committed to prior to the downturn in industry activity. In 1999, we also completed our vessel improvement program that consisted of the extensive upgrade and refurbishment of a significant portion of our Gulf supply boat fleet. While this refurbishment program resulted in significant vessel downtime in 1998 and in the first half of 1999, we believe that it extended the service lives of many of our vessels and has enabled us to significantly reduce required capital expenditures in 2000 and beyond. Capital expenditures for 2000 consisted principally of $5.6 million for miscellaneous vessel improvements and $7.7 million of deferred marine inspection costs.
In 2000, funds were provided by $39.4 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common equity in a public offering, $14.0 million in proceeds from the sale of our liftboats, $28.4 million in borrowings under our bank credit facilities and $8.2 million of cash from operations. During 2000, we repaid $63.7 million of debt and made capital expenditures totaling $13.2 million, which included $7.7 million of deferred marine inspection costs. Other capital expenditures during the period consisted primarily of miscellaneous vessel improvements.
As a result of the sale of our liftboats in May 2000, we recognized a gain, before taxes, of approximately $3.9 million in the second quarter. Proceeds of the sale were used to reduce amounts outstanding under our bank credit facility.
In June 2000, we exchanged 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $32.1 million principal amount, plus accrued interest, of our 8-1/2% senior notes due 2005. We now have outstanding approximately $247.9 million in senior notes. The senior notes are unsecured and are required to be guaranteed by all of our significant subsidiaries. Except in certain circumstances, the senior notes may not be prepaid until August 1, 2001, at which time they may be redeemed, at our option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 104.25% plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the redemption price declining ratably on August 1 of each of the succeeding three years. The indenture governing the senior notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends or make other distributions, create certain liens, sell assets, or enter into certain mergers or acquisitions.
We maintain a bank credit facility that provides a $45.0 million revolving line of credit that can be used for acquisitions and general corporate purposes. The bank credit facility is collateralized by a mortgage on substantially all of our vessels other than those located in the North Sea and Brazil. Amounts borrowed under the bank credit facility mature on July 19, 2002 and bear interest at a Eurocurrency rate plus a margin that depends on our leverage ratio. As of February 20, 2001, we had no outstanding borrowings under the bank credit facility. The bank credit facility requires us to maintain certain financial ratios and limits our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make capital expenditures, pay dividends or make certain other distributions, create certain liens, sell assets or enter into certain mergers or acquisitions. Although the bank credit facility does impose some limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us, it expressly permits distributions to us by our significant subsidiaries for scheduled principal and interest payments on the senior notes.
We also maintain a Norwegian revolving credit facility in the amount of NOK 450 million ($50.4 million). The commitment amount for this Norwegian bank facility reduces by NOK 50 million ($5.6 million) every six months, with the balance of the commitment to expire in June 2003. As of February 20, 2001, we had approximately NOK 325 million ($36.5 million) of debt outstanding under the facility. In April 2000, we executed a new loan agreement for an additional Norwegian bank facility in the amount of NOK 125 million ($14.6 million). The commitment amount for this additional facility reduces by NOK 12.5 million ($1.5 million) every six months beginning June 2001, with the balance of the commitment to expire June 2003. As of February 20, 2001, this additional facility was fully drawn. Amounts borrowed under these credit facilities bear interest at NIBOR (Norwegian Interbank Offered Rate) plus a margin. The weighted average interest rate for our Norwegian bank facilities was 8.26% as of December 31, 2000. Our Norwegian bank facilities are collateralized by mortgages on certain of our North Sea vessels, require that our North Sea operating unit maintain certain financial ratios and limit its ability to create liens, or merge or consolidate with other entities.
We believe that cash generated from our operations, together with available borrowings under our bank credit facilities, will be sufficient to fund our working capital requirements and currently planned capital expenditures. It was one of our objectives for 2000 to improve our financial flexibility by reducing our debt and improving our liquidity. As part of that objective, we completed the transactions described above during the second quarter of 2000, including our public offering of common stock, the senior note exchange, and the sale of our lift boats. It is also our objective to position ourselves to pursue acquisitions and opportunities to selectively build new vessels which enhance our capabilities and enable us to enter new market areas. Depending upon the size of such investments, it is likely that we would require additional equity or debt financing. However, we can give no assurances regarding the availability or terms of any possible transactions and the related debt and equity financing.
New Accounting Standards
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"). SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and is effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 will not have a material effect on our financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our market risk exposures primarily include interest rate and exchange rate fluctuation on derivative and financial instruments as detailed below. Our market risk sensitive instruments are classified as "other than trading". The following sections address the significant market risks associated with our financial activities during 2000. Trico's exposure to market risk as discussed below includes "forward-looking statements" and represents estimates of possible changes in fair values, future earnings or cash flows that would occur assuming hypothetical future movements in foreign currency exchange rates or interest rates. Our views on market risk are not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur and do not represent the maximum possible gains and losses that may occur, since actual gains and losses will differ from those estimated, based upon actual fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and the timing of transactions.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We have entered into a number of variable and fixed rate debt obligations, denominated in both the U.S. Dollar and the Norwegian Kroner (Norwegian debt payable in Norwegian Kroner), as detailed in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements. These instruments are subject to interest rate risk.
We manage this risk by monitoring our ratio of fixed and variable rate debt obligations in view of changing market conditions and from time to time altering that ratio by, for example, refinancing balances outstanding under our variable rate bank credit facilities with fixed-rate debt or by entering into interest rate swap agreements, when deemed appropriate.
As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, we had $52.7 million and $91.6 million, respectively, in variable rate debt. In 1999 we entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to manage our interest rate exposure on a portion of this debt. Under the terms of the agreement we paid a fixed rate of interest on a notional amount of principal to a counterparty. The counterparty, in turn, paid us a variable rate of interest on the same notional amount of principal. The effect of the swap agreements was to limit our interest rate exposure to a fixed percentage on a portion of the related debt obligation.
As of December 31, 2000, the carrying value of our long-term fixed rate debt, including accrued interest, was $283.2 million, which included our 8.5% Senior Notes ($256.6 million), 6.08% MARAD bonds ($7.7 million), 6.11% MARAD bonds ($17.2 million) and the Norwegian fixed rate debt ($1.7 million). As of December 31, 1999, the carrying value of our long-term fixed rate debt, including accrued interest, was $319.9 million. The fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 was approximately $266.7 million and $284.9 million, respectively. Fair value was determined using discounted future cash flows based on quoted market prices, where available, on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements as of the balance sheet dates. A hypothetical 1% increase in the applicable interest rates would decrease the fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 by approximately $11.1 million and $15.0 million, respectively. The hypothetical fair values are based on the same assumptions utilized in computing fair values.
As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the carrying value of our long-term variable rate debt, including accrued interest, was approximately $52.7 million and $92.9 million, respectively, which included our U.S. and Norwegian bank credit facilities. The fair value of this debt approximates the carrying value because the interest rates are based on floating rates identified by reference to market rates. Fair value was determined as noted above. A hypothetical 1% increase in the applicable interest rates as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 would increase annual interest expense by approximately $527,000 and $915,000 million, respectively.
The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements, as of December 31, 1999 was based on the estimated amounts that we would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date. As of December 31, 1999, a hypothetical 1% increase in the pay rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $250,000. A hypothetical 1% increase in the receive rates would decrease interest expense by corresponding amounts. In February, 2000 we sold certain of these interest rate swap agreements for approximately $360,000. As of December 31, 2000 we had no outstanding interest rate swap contracts.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Sensitivity
Our foreign subsidiaries collect revenues and pay expenses in several different foreign currencies. We monitor the exchange rate of our foreign currencies and, when deemed appropriate, enter into hedging transactions in order to mitigate the risk from foreign currency fluctuations. We also manage foreign currency risk by attempting to contract as much foreign revenue as possible in U.S. Dollars.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
| Index to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Page |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Report of Independent Accountants
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Trico Marine Services, Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trico Marine Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
February 16, 2001
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||
|
Current assets: |
||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 18,094 |
$ 5,898 |
||||||||
|
Restricted cash |
533 |
566 |
||||||||
|
Accounts receivable, net |
36,340 |
24,141 |
||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
3,458 |
3,671 |
||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes |
580 |
1,069 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Total current assets |
59,005 |
35,345 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Property and equipment, at cost: |
||||||||||
|
Land and buildings |
3,768 |
3,727 |
||||||||
|
Marine vessels |
582,448 |
|||||||||