Back to GetFilings.com



<PAGE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

Commission File Number: 0-24071

Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

                Delaware                
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

         16-1481551          
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

               6467 Main Street
               Buffalo, NY 14221
(Address of principal executive offices)
                     (Zip code)

                 (716) 633-1850

 


(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Securities
Not Applicable

Exchanges on which Registered
Not Applicable


   Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest
(Title of Class)

 

 

- 1 -

<PAGE>

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  [ X ]     No  [   ]

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]

          As of March 14, 2003, 13,436,617 Units of Limited Partnership Interest were outstanding.

Exhibit Index is on Pages 68-70

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

          Portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003 (Part III).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 2 -

<PAGE>

Part I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

General

          Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of the Company's business and owns substantially all of the Company's assets. The Operating Partnership is one of the largest owners and operators of self-storage properties in the Eastern United States and Texas. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. The term "Company" as used herein means Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (including the Operating Partnership) or, where the context so requires, Sovran Self Storage, Inc. only. The term "Operating Partnership" as used herein means Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership.

          At December 31, 2002, the Company is a 95.90% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT." The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.

          The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share ("Common Shares"), at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any such Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. With each such redemption or acquisition by the Company, the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equiva lent number of Units to the Company.

          The Operating Partnership may issue additional Units to acquire additional self-storage properties in transactions that in certain circumstances defer some or all of the sellers' tax consequences. The Operating Partnership believes that many potential sellers of self-storage properties have a low tax basis in their properties

 

- 3 -

<PAGE>

and would be more willing to sell the properties in transactions that defer Federal income taxes. Offering Units instead of cash for properties may provide potential sellers partial Federal income tax deferral.

          At March 15, 2003, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 264 Properties consisting of approximately 15.3 million net rentable square feet, situated in 21 states. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2002, the Properties have a weighted average occupancy of 84% and a weighted average annual rent per occupied square foot of $8.61. The Operating Partnership is the 5th largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on facilities owned and/or managed.

          The Operating Partnership seeks to increase cash flow and enhance unitholder value through aggressive management of the Properties and selective acquisitions of new self-storage properties. Aggressive property management entails increasing rents, increasing occupancy levels, strictly controlling costs, maximizing collections, strategically expanding and improving the Properties and, should economic conditions warrant, developing new properties. The Operating Partnership believes that there continues to be significant opportunities for growth through acquisitions, and constantly seeks to acquire self-storage properties that are susceptible to realization of increased economies of scale and enhanced performance through application of the Operating Partnership's management expertise.

          The Operating Partnership's principal executive offices are located at 6467 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14221, and its telephone number is (716) 633-1850.

Industry Overview

          The Operating Partnership believes that self-storage facilities offer inexpensive storage space to residential and commercial users. In addition to fully enclosed and secure storage space, some operators, including the Operating Partnership, also offer outside storage for automobiles, recreational vehicles and boats. The storage sites are usually fenced and well lighted with gates that are either manually operated or automated. All facilities have a full-time manager/leasing agent. Customers have access to their storage area during business hours and in certain circumstances are provided with 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by the customer's lock, which may be purchased from the Operating Partnership, and the customer has control of access to the unit.

          The Operating Partnership believes that the self-storage industry is characterized by a trend toward consolidation and a relatively slow growth in supply. The rate of demand growth, while still positive, slowed in 2002, primarily as a result of slower overall economic conditions. This, combined with rate reductions and discounts offered by much of the competition, has resulted in minimal revenue growth. Spring and summer of 2002 showed negligible improvement in revenue compared to the same periods at the same stores in 2001, while the fourth quarter showed a 3% increase.

 

- 4 -

<PAGE>

          The Operating Partnership has made a significant investment in technology in the past year, primarily in its call center. This investment has enabled the Operating Partnership to centralize its sales and marketing efforts and to spot leasing trends and opportunities in a more efficient and responsive manner. The Operating Partnership expects to gain market share and improve the yield realized on its rental spaces as a result of this call center management system.

          According to published data, of the approximately 35,000 facilities in the United States, less than 13% are managed by the ten largest operators. The remainder of the industry is characterized by numerous small, local operators. The shortage of skilled operators, the scarcity of equity capital available to small operators for acquisitions and expansions and the potential for savings through economies of scale are factors that are leading to a consolidation in the industry. The Operating Partnership believes that, as a result of this trend, significant growth opportunities exist for operators with proven management systems and sufficient capital resources.

Property Management

          The Operating Partnership believes that it has developed substantial expertise in managing self-storage facilities. Key elements of the Operating Partnership's management system include the following:

-

Recruiting, training and retaining capable, aggressive on-site property managers;

-

Motivating property managers by providing incentive-based compensation;

-

Developing and maintaining an integrated marketing plan for each Property; and

-

Performing regular preventative maintenance to avoid significant repair obligations.

          Property managers attend a thorough orientation program and undergo continuous training that emphasizes closing techniques, identification of selected marketing opportunities, networking with possible referral sources, and familiarization with the Operating Partnership's customized management information system. In addition to frequent contact with Regional Team Leaders and other Operating Partnership personnel, property managers receive periodic newsletters regarding a variety of operational issues, and from time to time attend "roundtable" seminars with other property managers.

          The Operating Partnership annually develops a written marketing plan for each of its Properties that is highly dependent upon local conditions. The focus of each marketing plan is, in part, determined by occupancy rates. If all storage units of the same size at a Property are at or near 90% occupancy, then the plan will generally include increases in rental rates. If a Property has excess capacity, then the marketing plan will target selected markets such as local military bases, colleges, apartment and condominium complexes, industrial parks, medical centers, retail shopping malls and office suites. The Operating Partnership primarily uses telephone directories to advertise its services, including a map and, when possible, listing Properties in the same

 

 

- 5 -

<PAGE>

marketplace in a single advertisement. The Operating Partnership also conducts quarterly surveys of its competitors' practices, which include "shopping" competing facilities.

          The Operating Partnership's customized computer system performs billing, collections and reservation functions for each Property, and also tracks information used in developing marketing plans based on occupancy levels, and tenant demographics and histories. The system generates daily, weekly and monthly financial reports for each Property that are transmitted to the Operating Partnership's principal office each night. The system also requires a property manager to input a descriptive explanation for all debit and credit transactions, paid-to-date changes, and all other discretionary activities, which allows the accounting staff at the Operating Partnership's principal office to promptly review all such transactions. Late charges are automatically imposed. More sensitive activities, such as rental rate changes and unit size or number changes, are completed only by Regional Team Leaders. The Operating Partnership's customized management infor mation system permits it to add new facilities to its portfolio with minimal additional overhead expense.

Marketing Initiatives

          Responding to the increased customer demand for services, the Operating Partnership has initiated several programs expected to increase occupancy and profitability. These programs include:

-

A Customer Care Center (call center) that services new and existing customers' inquiries and facilitate the capture of sales leads that were previously lost;

-

Internet marketing, providing information about all of the Operating Partnership's stores via numerous portals and e-mail;

-

Dri-guard, providing humidity-controlled spaces. Through an exclusive agreement, the Operating Partnership became the first self-storage operator to utilize this humidity protection technology. These environmental control systems are a premium storage feature intended to protect metal, electronics, furniture, fabrics and paper from moisture;

-

Uncle Bob's Trucks, which provide customers with convenient, affordable access to vehicles to help move their goods, while serving as moving billboards to help advertise our storage facilities; and

-

Flex-a-Space, an innovative construction design that allows the Operating Partnership to easily reconfigure walls by using a track and roller mechanism, enabling customized storage space to fit the individual needs of the customer.

Environmental and Other Regulations

          The Operating Partnership is subject to federal, state, and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities. The Operating Partnership has not received notice from any governmental authority or private party of any material environmental noncompliance, claim, or liability in connection with any of the Properties, and is not aware of

 

- 6 -

<PAGE>

any environmental condition with respect to any of the Properties that could have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership's financial condition or results of operations.

          The Properties are also generally subject to the same types of local regulations governing other real property, including zoning ordinances. The Operating Partnership believes that the Properties are in substantial compliance with all such regulations.

Insurance

          Each of the Properties is covered by fire, property insurance, including comprehensive liability, all-risk property insurance policies, which are provided by reputable companies and on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, the Operating Partnership maintains a policy insuring against environmental liabilities resulting from tenant storage on terms customary for the industry, and title insurance insuring fee title to the Operating Partnership owned Properties in an aggregate amount believed to be adequate.

Competition

          The primary factors upon which competition in the self-storage industry is based are location, rental rates, suitability of the property's design to prospective tenants' needs, and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. The Operating Partnership believes it competes successfully on these bases. The extent of competition depends in significant part on local market conditions. The Operating Partnership seeks to locate its facilities so as not to cause its Properties to compete with one another for customers, but the number of self-storage facilities in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the performance of any of the Properties.

          Several of the Operating Partnership's competitors, including Public Storage Management, Inc., Shurgard Incorporated, U-Haul International, and Storage USA, Inc., are larger and have substantially greater financial resources than the Operating Partnership. These larger operators may, among other possible advantages, be capable of greater leverage and the payment of higher prices for acquisitions.

Investment Policy

          While the Operating Partnership emphasizes equity real estate investments, it may, in its discretion, invest in mortgage and other real estate interests related to self-storage properties in a manner consistent with the Company's qualification as a REIT. The Operating Partnership may also retain a purchase money mortgage for a portion of the sale price in connection with the disposition of Properties from time to time. Should investment opportunities become available, the Operating Partnership may look to acquire self-storage properties via a joint-venture partnership or similar entity. The Operating Partnership may or may not have a significant investment in such a venture, but would use such an opportunity to expand its portfolio of branded and managed properties.

 

 

- 7 -

<PAGE>

          Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for the Company's REIT qualification, the Operating Partnership also may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.

Disposition Policy

          Management periodically reviews the assets comprising the Operating Partnership's portfolio. Any disposition decision will be based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the (i) potential to continue to increase cash flow and value, (ii) sale price, (iii) strategic fit with the rest of the Company's portfolio, (iv) potential for, or existence of, environmental or regulatory issues, (v) alternative uses of capital, and (vi) maintaining of the Company's qualification as a REIT.

          As part of an asset management program, the Operating Partnership has begun to "spin-off" non-core, slow-growth properties, into joint ventures. In cases where the Operating Partnership has a less than 50% ownership interest in a joint venture, the Properties of that joint venture are removed from the Operating Partnership's balance sheet and an investment in the joint venture is recorded. The Operating Partnership records only its percentage share of the operating results of unconsolidated joint ventures. These ventures may allow the Operating Partnership to i) increase incremental revenues through management fees, ii) provide strong returns on its equity in the joint venture, and iii) increase liquidity to allow redeployment of equity to repay debt, acquire stock, or buy higher growth properties. In 2000, the Operating Partnership sold seven facilities for approximately $20 million to an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Operating P artnership retained a 45% interest. In cases where the Operating Partnership is deemed to have greater than a 50% ownership interest, the joint venture is consolidated with the Operating Partnership's financial statements and a minority interest is recorded on the balance sheet and statement of operations for the portion of the joint venture not owned by the Operating Partnership.

Borrowing Policy

          The Board of Directors of the Company currently limits the amount of debt that may be incurred by the Company to less than 50% of the sum of market value of the issued and outstanding Common and Preferred Stock plus the Company's debt (Market Capitalization). The Company, however, may from time to time re-evaluate and modify its borrowing policy in light of then current economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors.

In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at 7.19%. The Operating Partnership also repaid a $30 million 1 year term note that matured in 2002.

 

 

- 8 -

<PAGE>

          To the extent that the Operating Partnership desires to obtain additional capital to pay distributions, to provide working capital, to pay existing indebtedness or to finance acquisitions, expansions or development of new properties, the Operating Partnership may utilize floating or fixed rate debt financing, retention of cash flow (subject to satisfying the Company's distribution requirements under the REIT rules) or a combination of these methods. Additional debt financing may also be obtained through mortgages on its Properties, which may be recourse, non-recourse, or cross-collateralized and may contain cross-default provisions. The Operating Partnership has not established any limit on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any single Property or on its portfolio as a whole. For additional information regarding borrowings, see Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operati ons - Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith.

Employees

          The Operating Partnership currently employs a total of 727 employees, including 264 Property Managers, 16 Regional Team Leaders, and 355 assistant managers and part-time employees. At the Operating Partnership's headquarters, in addition to its three executive officers, the Operating Partnership employs 89 people engaged in various support activities, such as accounting, customer care, and management information systems. None of the Operating Partnership's employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Operating Partnership considers its employee relations to be excellent.

Available Information

          The Operating Partnership files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to other information as required. The public may read and copy any materials that the Operating Partnership files with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330.  The Operating Partnership files this information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Operating Partnership also maintains a web site at http://www.sovr anss.com.

Item 2.

Properties

          At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed a total of 264 Properties situated in twenty-one states in the Eastern and Midwestern United States, Arizona and Texas. Eleven of the Properties are managed under an agreement with an unconsolidated joint venture that is 45% owned by the Operating Partnership.

          The Operating Partnership's self-storage facilities offer inexpensive, easily accessible, enclosed storage space to residential and commercial users on a month-to-month basis. Most of

- 9 -

<PAGE>

the Operating Partnership's Properties are fenced with computerized gates and are well lighted. All but thirty-five of the Properties are single-story, thereby providing customers with the convenience of direct vehicle access to their storage units. All Properties have a Property Manager on-site during business hours. Customers have access to their storage areas during business hours, and some commercial customers are provided 24-hour access. Individual storage units are secured by a lock furnished by the customer to provide the customer with control of access to the unit.

          All but a few of the Properties conduct business under the user-friendly trade name "Uncle Bob's Self-Storage" and the remainder are operated under various names acquired with the Properties. The Operating Partnership intends to convert all of the Properties to the "Uncle Bob's" trade name.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 10 -

<PAGE>

          The table below provides certain information regarding the Properties included in the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements:




Location



Year
Built




Sq. Ft.

Uncle
Bob's
Trade
Name

State
Occupancy
at
12/31/02




Acres




Units




Bldgs




Floors



Mgr.
Apt.




Construction

  Alabama

     

83%

           

Birmingham I

1990

  36,775

Y

 

  2.7

   288

   9

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Birmingham II

1990

  52,225

Y

 

  4.7

   391

   8

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Montgomery I

1982

  74,004

Y

 

  5.0

   613

  16

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Birmingham III

1970

  72,290

Y

 

  4.3

   402

   6

    1

N

Masonry/Steel Roof

Montgomery II

1984

  42,146

Y

 

  2.7

   294

  10

    1

N

Masonry/Steel Roof

Montgomery III

1988

  41,610

Y

 

  2.4

   380

   9

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Birmingham-Walt

1984

  64,580

Y

 

  3.3

   293

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Birmingham-Bessemer

1998

  44,070

Y

 

  5.6

   345

   8

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

  Arizona

     

80%

           

Gilbert-Elliot Rd.

1995

  66,855

Y

 

  3.3

   680

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Glendale-59th Ave.

1997

  67,126

Y

 

  4.6

   633

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Mesa-Baseline

1986

  39,100

Y

 

  1.8

   390

  11

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Mesa-E. Broadway

1986

  38,825

Y

 

  1.8

   369

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Mesa-W. Broadway

1976

  36,625

Y

 

  1.9

   385

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Mesa-Greenfield

1986

  48,359

Y

 

  2.1

   431

   8

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Phoenix-Camelback

1984

  43,605

Y

 

  2.0

   532

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Phoenix-Bell

1984

  96,580

Y

 

  4.6

   917

   7

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Phoenix-35th Ave.

1996

  70,985

Y

 

  4.3

   695

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Connecticut

     

78%

           

New Haven

1985

  47,680

Y

 

  3.9

   392

   5

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Hartford-Metro I

1988

  56,570

Y

 

10.0

   354

  10

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Hartford-Metro II

1992

  39,190

Y

 

  6.0

   323

   7

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

- 11 -

                     
                     

<PAGE>

                   

  Florida

     

86%

           
                     

Lakeland 1

1985

  47,955

Y

 

  3.5

   434

  11

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Tallahassee I

1973

143,405

Y

 

18.7

   677

  21

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Tallahassee II

1975

  51,380

Y

 

  4.0

   273

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Port St. Lucie

1985

  55,742

Y

 

  4.0

   535

  12

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Deltona

1984

  63,602

Y

 

  5.0

   449

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Jacksonville I

1985

  39,912

Y

 

  2.7

   290

  14

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Orlando I

1988

  50,520

Y

 

  2.8

   593

   3

    2

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Ft. Lauderdale

1985

101,235

Y

 

  7.6

   638

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

West Palm 1

1985

  51,585

Y

 

  3.2

   404

   6

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Melbourne I

1986

  83,578

Y

 

  8.3

   745

  11

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof

Pensacola I

1983

119,030

Y

 

  7.5

   862

13

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Pensacola II

1986

  58,204

Y

 

  3.4

   505

9

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Melbourne II

1986

  56,031

Y

 

  3.4

   610

11

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Jacksonville II

1987

  53,855

Y

 

  4.4

   471

11

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Pensacola III

1986

  84,490

Y

 

  6.1

   602

12

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Pensacola IV

1990

  38,850

Y

 

  2.7

   274

9

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Pensacola V

1990

  39,125

Y

 

  2.6

   317

4

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Tampa I

1989

  62,857

Y

 

  3.3

   865

6

    1

N

Masonry/Steel Roof

Tampa II

1985

  60,672

Y

 

  2.9

   675

10

    1

N

Masonry/Steel Roof

Tampa III

1988

  48,400

Y

 

  2.2

   636

14

    1

N

Masonry/Steel Roof

Orlando II

1986

134,869

Y

 

  8.5

1,319

  20

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Ft. Myers I

1988

  27,704

Y

 

  1.1

   259

   6

    2

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Ft. Myers II

1991/94

  23,053

Y

 

  1.9

   299

   2

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Tampa IV

1985

  57,915

Y

 

  4.0

   524

  10

    1

N

Masonry/Steel Roof

West Palm II

1986

  30,937

Y

 

  2.3

   364

   9

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Ft. Myers III

1986

  36,052

Y

 

  2.4

   257

   9

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Lakeland II

1988

  59,990

Y

 

  4.0

   580

   9

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Ft. Myers IV

1987

  59,560

Y

 

  4.5

   262

   4

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Jacksonville III

1987

102,430

Y

 

  5.9

   739

  13

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

- 12 -

<PAGE>

                   

Jacksonville IV

1985

  38,205

Y

 

  2.7

   352

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Jacksonville V

1987/92

  53,975

Y

 

  2.9

   493

  13

    2

Y

Steel Bldg./Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Orlando III

1975

  52,388

Y

 

  3.2

   496

   8

    2

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Orlando IV-W 25th St.

1984

  38,374

Y

 

  2.8

   347

   6

    1

Y

Steel Bldg/Steel Roof

Delray I-Mini

1969

  49,529

Y

 

  3.5

   437

   3

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof

Delray II-Safeway

1980

  69,760

Y

 

  4.3

   705

  17

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof

Tampa-E. Hillborough

1985

  84,220

Y

 

  5.3

   691

  16

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Ft. Myers-Mall

1991/94

  20,881

Y

 

  1.3

   230

   4

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Indian Harbor-Beach

1985

  66,208

Y

 

  4.0

   713

  15

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Hollywood-Sheridan

1988

130,663

Y

 

  7.0

1,172

  21

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof

Pompano Beach-Atlantic

1985

  77,062

Y

 

  4.0

   923

  17

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Concrete Roof

Pompano Beach-Sample

1988

  64,167

Y

  3.6

   798

  14

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Boca Raton-18th St.

1991

  87,782

Y

 

  6.2

   990

   8

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Vero Beach

1997

  34,450

Y

 

  1.9

   321

   2

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Hollywood-N. 21st

1987

  58,977

Y

 

  3.1

   710

  11

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Cocoa

1982

  75,205

Y

 

  2.5

   688

  12

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Plantation

1982

  42,311

Y

 

  2.9

   503

   4

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Georgia

     

85%

           

Savannah

1981

  72,580

Y

 

  5.4

   600

  11

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro I

1988

  69,860

Y

 

  3.9

   536

   5

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro II

1988

  45,300

Y

 

  3.9

   373

   6

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro III

1988

  56,945

Y

 

  5.3

   408

   9

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro IV

1989

  42,220

Y

 

  3.5

   308

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro V

1988

  44,195

Y

 

  4.2

   284

   3

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Atlanta-Metro VI

1986

  50,775

Y

 

  3.6

   443

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro VII

1981

  38,870

Y

 

  2.5

   326

   9

    2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Atlanta-Metro VIII

1975

  46,914

Y

 

  3.3

   432

   6

    2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Augusta I

1988

  52,000

Y

 

  4.0

   398

  13

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Macon I

1989

  40,850

Y

 

  3.2

   347

  14

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Augusta II

1987

  46,325

Y

 

  3.5

   361

   4

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Atlanta-Metro IX

1988

  56,106

Y

 

  4.6

   409

   6

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

- 13 -

<PAGE>

                   

Atlanta-Metro X

1988

  48,635

Y

 

  6.8

   445

   9

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Macon II

1989/94

  67,550

Y

 

14.0

   570

  11

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Savannah II

1988

  49,365

Y

 

  2.6

   458

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Atlanta-Alpharetta

1994

  81,040

Y

 

  5.8

   560

   8

1&2

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Marietta-Roswell

1996

  60,375

Y

 

  6.0

   448

   8

1&2

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Atlanta-Doraville

1995

  68,415

Y

 

  4.9

   621

   8

1&2

Y

Steel & Masonry Bldg./Steel Roof

Ft. Oglethorpe

1989

  45,100

Y

 

  3.3

   443

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Kingsland

1989

  66,829

Y

 

  4.1

   562

   12

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Louisiana

     

83%

           

Baton Rouge-Airline

1982

  71,720

Y

 

  2.5

   433

  12

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Baton Rouge-Airline 2

1985

  44,895

Y

 

  2.8

   437

   9

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Lafayette-Pinhook 1

1980

  56,625

Y

 

  3.2

   487

   7

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Lafayette-Pinhook 2

1992/94

  47,025

Y

 

  2.4

   432

   2

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Lafayette-Ambassador

1975

  33,860

Y

 

  2.0

   417

   3

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Lafayette-Evangeline

1977

  34,630

Y

 

  3.1

   347

   3

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Lafayette-Guilbeau

1994

  63,685

Y

 

  3.4

   598

   1

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

  Maine

     

88%

           

Westbrook

1988

  45,940

Y

 

  5.9

   475

   7

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Saco

1988

  53,750

Y

 

  4.2

   416

 12

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Maryland

     

90%

           

Salisbury

1979

  33,585

Y

 

  3.0

   416

  10

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Baltimore I-Frederick

1984

  21,233

Y

 

  1.9

   347

   2

    3

N

Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof

Baltimore II-Gaithersburg

1988

  60,645

Y

 

  2.2

   535

   2

    4

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Baltimore III-Landover

1990

  51,357

Y

 

  3.1

   666

   8

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

  Massachusetts

     

81%

           

New Bedford

1982

  42,338

Y

 

  3.4

   376

   7

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Springfield

1986

  53,614

Y

 

  4.7

   403

   5

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Salem

1979

  53,445

Y

 

  2.0

   500

   2

    2

Y

Steel Wall/Metal Roof

Boston-Metro I

1980

  37,805

Y

 

  2.0

   405

   3

    2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Boston-Metro II

1986

  38,710

Y

 

  3.6

   456

   8

    2

N

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

- 14 -

<PAGE>

                   

N. Andover

1989

  44,585

Y

 

  3.0

   534

   1

    3

N

Masonry & Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Dracut

1986

  45,926

Y

 

  5.0

   403

 11

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Methuen

1984

  50,640

Y

 

  3.4

   383

   6

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Plymouth

1996

  92,063

N

 

  7.7

   750

 14

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Sandwich

1984

  48,000

N

 

  4.9

   362

   8

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

  Michigan

     

77%

           

Grand Rapids II

1983

  43,500

Y

 

  8.0

   388

   6

    1

N

Masonry & Steel Walls

Holland

1978

  53,100

Y

 

13.6

   434

  18

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Holland-Paw Paw

1978

  58,680

Y

 

  5.3

   364

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Waterford-Highland

1978

136,611

Y

 

16.6

1,664

  16

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Mississippi

     

90%

           

Jackson I

1990

  42,100

Y

 

  2.0

   351

   6

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Jackson II

1990

  38,761

Y

 

  2.1

   306

   9

    1

Y

Masonry/Steel Roof

Jackson III-155

1995

  61,848

Y

 

  1.3

   420

   2

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Jackson-N. West

1984

  57,557

Y

 

  5.2

   480

  13

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

 New Hampshire

     

87%

           

Salem-Policy

1980

  62,025

Y

 

  8.7

   545

   9

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  New York

     

84%

           

Middletown

1988

  33,865

Y

 

  2.8

   337

   4

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Buffalo I

1981

  75,970

Y

 

  5.1

   524

  10

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Rochester I

1981

  41,834

Y

 

  2.9

   406

   5

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Rochester II

1980

  29,510

Y

 

  3.5

   242

   9

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Buffalo II

1984

  54,165

Y

 

  6.2

   417

  12

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Syracuse 1

1987

  77,385

Y

 

  7.5

   666

  16

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Syracuse II

1983

  67,824

Y

 

  3.6

   544

  10

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Shingled Roof

Rochester III

1990

  66,784

Y

 

  2.7

   495

   1

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Harriman

1989/95

  74,340

Y

 

  6.1

   638

  10

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Monroe

1998

  36,240

Y

 

13.3

   318

   4

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Syracuse

1987

  35,090

Y

 

  2.2

   289

  12

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

The Hamptons

1989/95

  64,885

N

 

  3.2

   775

   5

    2

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

- 15 -

<PAGE>

                   

The Hamptons

1998

  32,970

N

 

  1.1

   311

   1

    4

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

The Hamptons

1997

  35,210

N

 

  1.9

   428

   2

    2

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

The Hamptons

1994/98

  65,000

N

 

  3.7

   720

   4

    2

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

  North Carolina

     

74%

           

Charlotte

1986

  37,815

Y

 

  2.9

   333

   6

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Fayetteville

1980

  87,294

Y

 

  6.2

   908

  12

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Greensboro

1986

  45,180

Y

 

  3.4

   404

   5

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Mas. Wall/Steel Roof

Raleigh I

1985

  58,410

Y

 

  5.0

   540

   8

    2

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Raleigh II

1985

  33,125

Y

 

  2.5

   318

   8

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Charlotte II

1995

  48,971

Y

 

  5.6

   402

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Charlotte III

1995

  30,920

Y

 

  2.9

   319

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Greensboro-Hilltop

1995

  32,153

Y

 

  1.0

   295

   7

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Greensboro-StageCoach

1997

  35,825

Y

 

  2.5

   232

   2

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Greensboro-High Point

1993

  57,717

Y

 

  2.5

   494

   9

    1

N

Steel Wall/Metal Roof

Durham-Hillborough

1988/91

  67,981

Y

 

  5.0

   600

   5

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Durham-Cornwallis

1990/96

  78,645

Y

 

  4.7

   662

   9

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Jacksonville-Center

1995

  51,100

Y

 

  5.0

   396

  11

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Jacksonville-Gum Branch

1989

  62,916

Y

 

  5.0

   477

  14

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Jacksonville-N. Marine

1985

  47,810

Y

 

  8.4

   392

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

  Ohio

     

88%

           

Youngstown

1980

  54,830

Y

 

  5.8

   362

   5

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Cleveland-Metro I

1980

  49,200

Y

 

  6.4

   358

   9

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Cleveland-Metro II

1987

  60,500

Y

 

  4.8

   440

   4

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Youngstown

1988

  55,900

Y

 

  3.9

   499

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Akron

1990

  38,320

Y

 

  3.4

   296

  12

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland III

1986

  68,175

Y

 

  3.4

   586

  12

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland IV

1978

  65,000

Y

 

  3.5

   561

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland V

1979

  74,882

Y

 

  3.1

   637

   9

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland VI

1979

  47,170

Y

 

  2.6

   377

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland VII

1977

  70,270

Y

 

  4.3

   595

  13

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland VIII

1970

  47,725

Y

 

  5.7

   452

   6

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

- 16 -

<PAGE>

                   

Cleveland IX

1982

  54,910

Y

 

  4.4

   298

   5

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Cleveland 10-Avon

1989

  46,942

Y

 

  5.8

   371

   6

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Warren-Elm

1986

  60,200

Y

 

  7.3

   483

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Warren-Youngstown

1986

  58,987

Y

 

  5.0

   525

  11

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Batavia

1988

  61,818

Y

 

  5.5

   547

   9

    1

N

Metal Wall/Steel Roof

  Pennsylvania

     

92%

           

Allentown

1983

  40,800

Y

 

  6.3

   341

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Sharon

1975

  38,270

Y

 

  3.0

   304

   5

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Harrisburg I

1983

  49,120

Y

 

  4.1

   444

   9

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Harrisburg II

1985

  59,450

Y

 

  9.2

   292

  10

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Pittsburgh

1990

  57,365

Y

 

  3.4

   504

   6

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Pittsburgh II

1983

102,780

Y

 

  4.8

   743

   4

    2

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingled Roof

Harrisburg-Peiffers

1984

  63,740

Y

 

  4.1

   604

   9

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Rhode Island

     

87%

           

East Greenwich

1984

  45,620

Y

 

  2.9

   412

   9

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Frenchtown

1988

  24,860

Y

 

  2.0

   238

   4

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

W. Warwick

1986/94

  52,426

Y

 

  2.3

   485

   4

    1

N

Metal Wall/Steel Roof

Providence

1984

  38,610

Y

 

  3.7

   386

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

  South Carolina

     

82%

           

Charleston I

1985

  49,654

Y

 

  3.3

   396

  11

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Mas. Wall/Steel Roof

Columbia I

1985

  47,710

Y

 

  3.3

   390

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Columbia II

1987

  58,690

Y

 

  6.0

   447

   8

    1

N

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Columbia III

1989

  41,190

Y

 

  3.5

   330

   5

    2

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Columbia IV

1986

  57,450

Y

 

  5.6

   444

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Spartanburg

1989

  40,450

Y

 

  3.6

   341

   6

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Charlestown II

1985

  40,318

Y

 

  2.2

   330

  10

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Columbia

1985

  73,490

Y

 

  5.0

   775

  17

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Myrtle Beach

1984

  61,350

Y

 

  4.8

   584

  12

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

  Tennessee

     

82%

           

Chattanooga-Lee Hwy

1987

  37,877

Y

 

  3.3

   391

   6

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

- 17 -

<PAGE>

                   

Chattanooga-Hwy 58

1985

  35,460

Y

 

  2.4

   295

   4

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Hendersonville

1986/97

  93,955

Y

 

  5.7

   651

  16

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

  Texas

     

83%

           

Arlington I

1987

  45,815

Y

 

  2.3

   382

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Arlington II

1986

  67,220

Y

 

  3.8

   280

  11

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Ft. Worth

1986

  40,850

Y

 

  2.4

   333

   3

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Asphalt Roof

San Antonio I

1986

  49,675

Y

 

  3.9

   484

  12

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

San Antonio II

1986

  39,870

Y

 

  1.9

   283

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

San Antonio III

1981

  48,782

Y

 

  2.6

   485

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Universal

1985

  35,160

Y

 

  2.4

   376

   8

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

San Antonio IV

1995

  54,620

Y

 

  5.4

   528

  11

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Houston-Eastex

1993/95

  83,900

Y

 

  6.4

   663

   5

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Steel Roof

Houston-Nederland

1995

  61,911

Y

 

  6.3

   531

   1

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Steel Roof

Houston-College

1995

  35,650

Y

 

  1.8

   316

   1

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Steel Roof

Dallas-Skillman

1975

121,026

Y

 

  5.9

1,080

   8

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Dallas-Centennial

1977

102,989

Y

 

  6.7

   992

   8

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Dallas-Samuell

1975

  79,046

Y

 

  3.8

   784

   6

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Dallas-Hargrove

1975

  71,934

Y

 

  3.1

   734

   5

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Houston-Antoine

1984

  75,720

Y

 

  4.1

   657

   9

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Katy

1994

  43,995

Y

 

  8.6

   437

  10

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Humble

1986

  63,669

Y

 

  2.3

   586

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Old Katy

1996

  52,860

Y

 

  3.0

   490

  19

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Shingle Roof

Webster-Hwy 3

1997

  55,350

Y

 

  3.3

   536

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Carrollton

1997

  51,740

Y

 

  3.2

   497

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

San Marcos

1994

  61,690

Y

 

  5.0

   432

  18

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Austin-McNeil

1994

  72,485

Y

 

  7.0

   548

  19

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Austin-FM

1996

  59,910

Y

 

  4.9

   388

   9

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Euless

1996

  93,480

Y

 

  7.5

   517

   9

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

N. Richland Hills

1996

  76,535

Y

 

  7.4

   554

  11

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Katy-Franz

1993

  67,145

Y

 

  7.2

   530

  10

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Cedar Hill

1985

  52,735

Y

 

  3.0

   410

  16

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

- 18 -

<PAGE>

                   

Seabrook

1996

  61,245

Y

 

  4.3

   539

   5

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Westward

1996

125,854  

Y

 

  6.1

1,161

11

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof

Houston-Boone

1996

  45,435

Y

 

  2.3

   441

   4

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Cook

1996

  60,455

Y

 

  3.0

   490

   7

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Harwin

1996

  77,454

Y

 

  2.8

   652

   3

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof

Houston-Hempstead

1996

  99,231

Y

 

  3.5

   902

   10

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Kuykendahl

1996

102,600

Y

 

  4.8

   789

   12

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Hwy 249

1996

  54,516

Y

 

  2.9

   536

   4

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Mesquite-Hwy 80

1996

  63,590

Y

 

  6.1

   643

   6

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar-Gravel Roof

Mesquite-Franklin

1996

  83,705

Y

 

  3.2

   753

   13

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Dallas-Plantation

1996

  61,865

Y

 

  2.4

   507

   10

1&2

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

San Antonio-Hunt

1996

  63,695

Y

 

  4.1

   580

   15

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Humble

1996

116,120

Y

 

  5.9

   805

   4

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Pasadena

1996

  55,675

N

 

  3.2

   503

   1

    1

N

Metal & MasonryWall/Metal Roof

League City

1996

  72,520

Y

 

  4.4

   573

   6

1&2

N

Metal & MasonryWall/Metal Roof

Montgomery

1996

  44,400

Y

 

  2.5

   391

   1

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Texas City

1996

  55,700

Y

 

  3.4

   466

   3

    1

N

Metal & Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Houston-Hwy 6

1996

  47,475

Y

 

  2.6

   432

   1

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

Lumberton

1996

  45,290

Y

 

  4.1

   391

   5

    1

N

Metal Wall/Metal Roof

  Virginia

     

85%

           

Newport News I

1988

  58,305

Y

 

  3.2

   476

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Alexandria

1984

  76,470

Y

 

  3.2

1,144

   4

    2

Y

Masonry Wall/Tar & Gravel Roof

Norfolk I

1984

  50,430

Y

 

  2.7

   379

   7

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Norfolk II

1989

  45,275

Y

 

  2.1

   351

   4

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Richmond

1987

  51,985

Y

 

  2.7

   525

   5

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Newport News II

1988/93

  63,625

Y

 

  4.7

   413

   8

    1

Y

Steel Bldg./Steel Roof

Lynchburg-Lakeside

1982

  47,628

Y

 

  5.3

   433

  10

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Lynchburg-Timberlake

1985

  43,830

Y

 

  2.3

   353

   4

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Steel Roof

Lynchburg-Amherst

1987

  23,618

Y

 

  1.5

   208

   3

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Christiansburg

1985/90

  37,438

Y

 

  3.2

   344

   6

    1

Y

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Chesapeake

1988/95

  43,075

Y

 

12.0

   390

   7

    1

Y

Metal Wall/Steel Roof

- 19 -

<PAGE>

                   

Danville

1988

  49,792

Y

 

  3.2

   408

   8

    1

N

Steel Wall/Metal Roof

Chesapeake-Military

1996

  58,505

Y

 

  3.0

   526

   3

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Chesapeake-Volvo

1995

  63,250

Y

 

  4.0

   533

   4

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Virginia Beach-Shell

1991

  52,626

Y

 

  2.5

   553

   5

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Virginia Beach-Central

1993/95

  96,031

Y

 

  5.0

   881

   6

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Norfolk-Naval Base

1975

 126,918

Y

 

  5.2

1,250

  11

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

Lynchburg-Timberlake

1990/96

  50,145

Y

 

  5.2

   473

   7

    1

N

Masonry Wall/Metal Roof

          Total for all Properties                          14,630,733                        84%             1,078       127,419   2,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 20 -

<PAGE>

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

          In the normal course of business, the Operating Partnership is subject to various claims and litigation. While the outcome of any litigation is inherently unpredictable, the Operating Partnership does not believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse impact on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Operating Partnership.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

          No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

          There is no established public trading market for Units. As of March 14, 2003, there were 12 holders of record of Units.

          The following table sets forth the quarterly distributions per Unit paid by the Operating Partnership to holders of its Units with respect to each such period.

History of Distributions Declared on Units

1st Quarter, 2001

$0.580 per unit

2nd Quarter, 2001

$0.580 per unit

3rd Quarter, 2001

$0.590 per unit

4th Quarter, 2001

$0.590 per unit

1st Quarter, 2002

$0.590 per unit

2nd Quarter, 2002

$0.590 per unit

3rd Quarter, 2002

$0.600 per unit

4th Quarter, 2002

$0.600 per unit

          The partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute all available cash (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) on at least a quarterly basis, in amounts determined by the general partner in its sole discretion, to the partners in accordance with their respective percentage interest in the Operating Partnership. Distributions are declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Holdings, the general partner of the Operating Partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and will depend on actual funds from operations of the Operating Partnership, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. The Board of Directors of Holdings may modify the Operating Partnersh ip's distribution policy from time to time, subject to the terms of the Partnership Agreement.

- 21 -

<PAGE>

          The Operating Partnership's line of credit contains customary representations, covenants and events of default, including covenants which restrict the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions in excess of stated amounts. In general, during any four consecutive fiscal quarters the Operating Partnership may only distribute up to 105% of the Operating Partnership's funds from operations (as defined in the related agreement). The line of credit contains exceptions to these limitations to allow the Operating Partnership to make any distributions necessary to allow the Company to maintain its status as a REIT. The Operating Partnership does not anticipate that this provision will adversely affect the ability of the Operating Partnership to make distributions, as currently anticipated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 22 -

<PAGE>

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

 

                    At or For Year Ended December 31,                   

(dollars in thousands,
except per unit data)


2002


2001


2000


1999


1998

           

Operating Data

         

Operating revenues

$ 102,141 

$  91,012 

$  90,152 

$  84,078 

$  69,173

Net income

27,481 

25,721 

27,519 

27,347 

24,798

Net income per common unit - basic

1.67 

1.75 

1.90 

1.97 

1.91

Net income per common unit - diluted

1.65 

1.74 

1.90 

1.97 

1.91

Distributions declared per common unit

2.38 

2.34 

2.30 

2.26 

2.20

           

Balance Sheet Data

Investment in storage facilities at cost


$710,841 


$611,289 


$562,721 


$556,473 


$502,502

Total assets

652,337 

567,838 

547,139 

529,719 

490,124

Total debt

252,452 

241,190 

231,223 

203,253 

190,059

Total liabilities

278,755 

255,999 

246,309 

218,281 

203,439

Limited partners' capital interest at redemption vale


15,736 


20,584 


16,954 


15,888 


21,683

Partners' capital

341,315 

274,170 

283,876 

295,550 

265,002

           

Other Data

         

Net cash provided by operating activities

$  45,610 

$  40,922 

$  39,428 

$  41,001 

$  35,151 

Net cash used in investing activities

(99,244)

(17,751)

(25,274)

(51,335)

(154,367)

Net cash provided by (used in)
  financing activities


53,814 


(22,709)


(13,765)


8,382 


119,633 

Funds from operations available to common unitholders (1)


 38,680 


37,481 


36,051 


37,815 


34,908 

(1)  The Operating Partnership believes that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about its operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of its operating results.  Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. See the reconciliation of net income to FFO in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and results of Operations.

 

- 23 -

<PAGE>

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

          The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

          When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words "intends," "believes," "expects", "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and in Section 21F of Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Operating Partnership's ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Operating Partnership's existing business and operations; the Operating Partnership's ability to form joint ventures and sell existing properties to those joint ventures and others; the Operating Partnership's ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Operating Partnership's existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Operating Partnership's outstanding floating rate debt; the Operating Partnership's ability to successfully implement its truck leasing program and Dri-Guard product roll-out; the Operating Partnership's reliance on its call center; the Operating Partnership's cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; and tax law changes which may change the taxability of future income.

Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

          The Operating Partnership's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Operating Partnership's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Operating Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, the Operating Partnership evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to carrying values of storage facilities, bad debts, and contingencies and litigation. The Operating Partnership bases its estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities tha t are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

          The Operating Partnership believes its judgment regarding the impairment of the carrying value of its storage facilities is a significant accounting policy. The Operating Partnership's policy is to assess any impairment of value whenever events or circumstances indicate that the

- 24 -

<PAGE>

carrying value of the storage facility may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances would include negative operating cash flow or significant declining revenue per storage facility. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the storage facility, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. If cash flow projections are inaccurate and in the future it is determined that storage facility carrying values are not recoverable, impairment charges may be required at that time and could materially affect the Operating Partnership's operating results and financial position. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy and, accordingly, this policy had no impact on the Operating Partnership's fi nancial position or results of operations.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

          The Operating Partnership recorded rental revenues of $100.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $10.9 million or 12.2% when compared to 2001 rental revenues of $89.1 million. Of this increase, $1.2 million resulted from a 1.3% increase in revenues at the 222 core properties considered in same store sales. The remaining $9.7 million increase in rental revenues resulted from the acquisition of 23 stores during 2002 and from having the 2001 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. Other income increased $0.2 million due to increased insurance sales and the additional revenue generated by truck rentals.

          Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $5.1 million or 17.7% in 2002 compared to 2001. Of this, $3.5 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2002 and from having the 2001 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. The remaining $1.6 million increase was due to increased insurance, personnel, truck expense, and property taxes at the 222 core properties considered same stores.

          General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million or 7.0%. The increase includes additional costs of approximately $2.3 million, which primarily resulted from increased cost in the Operating Partnership's call center and the increased costs associated with operating the properties acquired in 2002. The 2001 general and administrative expenses included a $1.7 million expense in connection with the lawsuit settlement - see Note 15 of the financial statements. There was no such charge in 2002.

          Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $17.4 million from $15.0 million, primarily as a result of additional depreciation taken on real estate assets acquired in 2002 and a full year of depreciation on 2001 acquisitions.

          Income from operations increased from $39.5 million in 2001 to $42.6 million in 2002 as a result of the aforementioned items.

 

 

 

- 25 -

<PAGE>

          Interest expense increased from $13.9 million to $14.7 million as a result of higher rates associated with the mortgage debt incurred on the consolidated joint venture properties and the effect of interest rate swap agreements entered into during 2001.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

          The Operating Partnership recorded rental revenues of $89.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $0.9 million or 1% when compared to 2000 rental revenues of $88.2 million. Of this, $3.3 million resulted from a 4% increase in revenues at the 217 core properties considered in same store sales. $0.5 million resulted from the acquisition of eight stores during 2001 and from having the 2000 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. These increases were offset by a $2.9 million decrease from the sale of seven stores to a joint venture in 2000.

          Property operating and real estate tax expense increased $1.5 million or 5% in 2001 compared to 2000. Of this increase, $1.4 million resulted from increased expenses at the 217 core properties considered as same stores. $0.7 million was incurred by the facilities acquired in 2001 and from having the 2000 acquisitions included for a full year of operations. These increases were offset by a reduction of $0.6 million from the sale of seven stores to a joint venture in 2000.

          General and administrative expenses increased $2.2 million or 38.7% in 2001 compared to 2000. The increase was primarily a result of a $1.7 million expense in connection with a lawsuit settlement - see Note 15 of the financial statements.

          Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $15.0 million from $14.3 million, primarily as a result of the additional depreciation taken on the real estate assets acquired in 2001 and a full year of depreciation on 2000 acquisitions.

          Income from operations decreased 8.3% from $43.0 million in 2000 to $39.5 million in 2001 as a result of the aforementioned items.

          In 2001, interest expense decreased to $13.9 million from $17.5 million as a result of significant decreases in interest rates.

          The Operating Partnership recorded a $0.1 million loss in 2001 from its ownership interest in two real estate joint ventures.

RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

 

For Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands)


2002


2001


2000


1999


1998

           

Net income

$ 27,481 

$  25,721 

$  27,519 

$  27,347 

$  24,798

Minority interest in income

810 

85 

-

- 26 -

           
           
           

<PAGE>

         

Depreciation of real estate and
   amortization of intangible assets
   exclusive of deferred financing fees



16,497 



14,122 



13,446 



12,359 



10,110

Gain on sale of real estate

(2,161)

(652)

-

Share of office building joint venture
   loss


42 


305 


- - 


- - 


- -

Depreciation and amortization from
   unconsolidated joint ventures


358 


328 


202 


- - 


- -

Preferred stock dividends

(4,863)

(2,955)

(2,955)

(1,239)

-

Funds from operations allocable to
    minority interest in Locke Sovran II


(1,645)


       (125)


            - 


          - 


          -

Funds from operations available to
   common unitholders


$ 38,680 


$ 37,481 


$ 36,051 


$ 37,815 


$ 34,908

          The Operating Partnership believes that Funds from Operations ("FFO") provides relevant and meaningful information about its operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of its operating results.  Funds from operations is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

          Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions.

CAPITAL RESOURCES, UNSECURED LINE OF CREDIT AND TERM NOTE

          The Operating Partnership's unsecured credit facility provides availability up to $150 million, of which $128 million was drawn on December 31, 2002. The facility matures in November 2003 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.375%.

          In addition to the credit facility, the Operating Partnership has a $75 million unsecured term note bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75%. The $75 million note has a maturity date of November 2003, but can be extended through November 2005 at the Operating Partnership's option.

          The credit facility and term notes currently have investment grade ratings from Standard and Poor's (BBB-), Moody's (Baa3), and Fitch (BBB-).

 

 

- 27 -

<PAGE>

          In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year note bears interest at 7.19%.

          Principal maturities of the mortgage for the next five years are as follows: 2003, $0.7 million; 2004, $0.7 million; 2005, $0.8 million; 2006, $0.9 million; and 2007, $0.9 million.

          During 2002, the Operating Partnership entered into lease agreements, qualifying as capital leases, for trucks to be used at its storage facilities. Principal maturities for capital lease obligations are as follows: 2003, $0.5 million; 2004, $0.5 million; 2005, $0.6 million; and 2006, $0.3 million.

          In July 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is currently rated by Standard and Poor's (BB+), Moody's (Ba2) and Fitch (BB+).

          On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 379,166 shares of common stock at $32.60 per share in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share and the net proceeds of $67.9 million were used to reduce indebtedness that was incurred in the June acquisition of seven self-storage properties and to repay a portion of the line of credit.

          In 2002, the Company acquired 186,617 shares of its common stock via the Share Repurchase Program authorized by the Board of Directors. Through December 31, 2002, the Company has reacquired 1,026,070 shares pursuant to this program. From time to time, subject to market price and certain loan covenants, the Company expects to continue reacquiring shares.

          The Operating Partnership believes that its internally generated cash flows and borrowing capacity under the credit facility will be sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements, dividends, and share repurchases for the year 2003. The Operating Partnership expects to replace its maturing unsecured credit facility with a new unsecured credit facility and medium to long-term unsecured term notes. Future growth is expected to be funded through issuance of secured or unsecured term notes, issuance of common or preferred stock, sale of Properties, private placement solicitation of joint venture equity and other sources of capital.

The Operating Partnership's outstanding unsecured debt as of December 31, 2002, assuming available extensions, matures as follows: 2003, $128 million; and 2005, $75 million.

ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES

          During 2002, the Operating Partnership and the consolidated joint venture used borrowings pursuant to the line of credit and a mortgage to acquire 23 Properties in Texas and New York

 

- 28 -

<PAGE>

comprising 1.5 million square feet from unaffiliated storage operators. In 2001, three facilities totaling 200,000 square feet were acquired. At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned and/or operated 264 self-storage facilities in 21 states. Of these facilities, 11 are managed by the Operating Partnership for Locke Sovran I, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture.

FUTURE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS

          The Operating Partnership's external growth strategy is to increase the number of facilities it owns by acquiring suitable facilities in markets in which it already has operations, or to expand in new markets by acquiring several facilities at once in those new markets.

          At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership had no contracts to acquire additional properties.

          The Operating Partnership also intends to expand and enhance certain of its existing facilities by building additional storage buildings on presently vacant land and by installing climate control and enhanced security systems at selected sites.

DISPOSITION OF PROPERTIES

          During 2001, the Operating Partnership sold eight Properties for approximately $24.5 million to Locke Sovran II, LLC. Because Locke Sovran II, LLC is a consolidated joint venture, no gain was recognized on the sale.

          In 2000, the Operating Partnership sold seven Properties for approximately $20 million, recognizing a gain of $2.1 million. The gain recognized represents the proportion of the total gain not related to the Operating Partnership's ongoing ownership interest. The Properties were sold to an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Operating Partnership retained a 45% interest and whose properties the Operating Partnership will manage for an ongoing fee. The Operating Partnership invested $5 million of the proceeds to fund its 45% interest in the venture and received a short-term promissory note of approximately $15 million. The note was repaid in 2001 and the Operating Partnership used the proceeds to pay down its outstanding line of credit, freeing up working capital for acquisitions and expansions done in 2001.

          The Operating Partnership may seek to sell additional Properties to similar joint venture programs or third parties in 2003.

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

          Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Operating Partnership's headquarters and other tenants.

          In December 2000, the Operating Partnership contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million one

- 29 -

<PAGE>

year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's loss was $12,500, which is recorded as equity in losses of joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income.

          The Operating Partnership also has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2002. The majority of the $1.6 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by the Operating Partnership to the joint venture. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's loss was $42,000. The Operating Partnership paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $225,000 in 2002 and 2001.

          A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is as follows:

          

(dollars in thousands)

Locke Sovran I,
          LLC        

 Iskalo Office  
Holdings, LLC 

Balance Sheet Data:

   

Investment in storage facilities, net

$ 40,099

$           - 

Investment in office building

6,903 

Other assets

     1,952 

        471 

  Total Assets

$ 42,051 

$    7,374 

Due to the Operating Partnership

$ 2,023 

$   1,574 

Demand note payable

 -  

       900 

Mortgage payable

30,269 

5,800 

Other liabilities

       706 

       137 

  Total Liabilities

32,998 

8,411 

Unaffiliated partners' equity (deficiency)

4,913 

(529)

Company equity (deficiency)

    4,140 

      (508)

  Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficiency)

$ 42,051 

$   7,374 


Income Statement Data:

   

Total revenues

$   5,807 

$      815 

Total expenses

    5,835 

      901 

 

  Net loss

$     (28) 

$      (86)

          The Operating Partnership does not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC; it does guarantee the $900,000 demand note payable of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.

DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND IMPACT ON THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

          As a REIT, the Company is not required to pay federal income tax on income that it distributes to its shareholders, provided that the amount distributed is equal to at least 90% of its taxable income. These distributions must be made in the year to which they relate, or in the

 

- 30 -

<PAGE>

following year if declared before the Company files its federal income tax return, and if it is paid before the first regular dividend of the following year. The first distribution of 2003 may be applied toward the Company's 2002 distribution requirement. The Company's source of funds for such distributions is solely and directly from the Operating Partnership.

          As a REIT, the Company must derive at least 95% of its total gross income from income related to real property, interest and dividends. In 2002, the Company's percentage of revenue from such sources exceeded 97%, thereby passing the 95% test, and no special measures are expected to be required to enable the Company to maintain its REIT designation.

INTEREST RATE RISK

          At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership has three outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The first, entered into in March 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 5.36% through November 2005 on $50 million notional amount. The second, entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.485% through October 2006 on another $50 million notional amount. The third, also entered in September 2001, effectively fixes the LIBOR base rate at 4.805% through September 2008 on $30 million notional amount. The Operating Partnership has an unsecured credit facility in place through November 2003 enabling the Operating Partnership to borrow funds at rates of LIBOR plus 1.375% and 1.75%. Accordingly, as a result of the above described interest rate swap agreements, the Operating Partnership has fixed its interest rate through November 2003 on $50 million at 6.735%, on another $50 million at 5.86%, and on $30 million at 6.555%. Upon renewal or replacement of the credit facility, the Operating Partnership's total interest may change dependent on the terms it negotiates with its lenders; however, the LIBOR base rates have been contractually fixed on $130 million of the Operating Partnership's debt through the interest rate swap termination dates.

          Because all but $130 million of the Operating Partnership's outstanding unsecured debt of $203 million is on a floating rate basis, changes in short term interest rates could have a significant impact on the Operating Partnership's earnings and funds from operations. Should the Operating Partnership enter into further rate swap agreements, earnings could be negatively affected, as short-term rates are presently significantly below the five and seven year cost of funds.

          Based upon the Operating Partnership's indebtedness at December 31, 2002, and taking the interest rate swap agreements into account, a 1% increase in interest rates would result in an increase to interest expense of approximately $0.7 million.

INFLATION

          The Operating Partnership does not believe that inflation has had or will have a direct effect on its operations. Substantially all of the leases at the facilities allow for monthly rent increases, which provide the Operating Partnership with the opportunity to achieve increases in rental income as each lease matures.

 

 

- 31 -

<PAGE>

SEASONALITY

          The Operating Partnership's revenues typically have been higher in the third and fourth quarters, primarily because the Operating Partnership increases its rental rates on most of its storage units at the beginning of May and because self-storage facilities tend to experience greater occupancy during the late spring, summer and early fall months due to the greater incidence of residential moves during these periods. However, the Operating Partnership believes that its tenant mix, diverse geographic locations, rental structure and expense structure provide adequate protection against undue fluctuations in cash flows and net revenues during off-peak seasons. Thus, the Operating Partnership does not expect seasonality to affect materially distributions to unitholders.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

          In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" (SFAS 144). SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of," but retains its fundamental provisions for recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and those to be disposed of by sale. SFAS 144 also extends the reporting of a discontinued operation to a component of an entity. The Operating Partnership adopted this standard in 2002. The adoption of this standard had no material effect on the Operating Partnership's results of operations and financial condition in 2002.

UNITHOLDER INFORMATION

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
6467 Main Street
Buffalo, New York 14221
716-633-1850

SOVRAN'S WEBSITE
http://www.sovranss.com

FORM 10-K REPORT

A copy of the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, will be furnished to unitholders without charge upon written request. Please contact Christine M. Aguglia, 716-633-1850

INVESTOR RELATIONS

For more information or to receive Sovran's quarterly reports, please contact Diane M. Piegza, 716-633-1850

 

 

 

- 32 -

<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
1400 Key Tower
Buffalo, New York 14202

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

          The information required is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption "Interest Rate Risk" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above.

 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

                             December 31,              

(dollars in thousands, except unit data)

   2002   

   2001   

Assets

   

Investment in storage facilities:

   

 Land

$ 132,853 

$ 117,069 

 Building and equipment

   577,988 

   494,220 

 

710,841 

611,289 

 Less: accumulated depreciation

   (75,344)

   (59,091)

Investment in storage facilities, net

635,497 

552,198 

Cash and cash equivalents

2,063 

1,883 

Accounts receivable

1,785 

1,064 

Receivable from related parties

98 

122 

Receivable from joint ventures

2,023 

679 

Investment in joint ventures

3,386 

3,659 

Prepaid expenses

2,719 

2,505 

Fair value of interest rate swap agreements

-   

373 

Other assets

     4,766 

     5,355 

  Total Assets

$ 652,337 

$ 567,838 

Liabilities

   

Line of credit

$128,000 

$134,000 

Term note

75,000 

105,000 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

4,691 

3,969 

Deferred revenue

3,468 

3,157 

Fair value of interest rate swap agreements

10,020 

-   

Accrued distributions

8,124 

7,683 

Capital lease obligations

1,933 

-   

Mortgage payable

     47,519 

     2,190 

  Total Liabilities

278,755 

255,999 

Minority interest - consolidated joint venture

16,531 

17,085 


Limited partners' capital interest (554,865
  units in 2002 and 660,841 in 2001) at
  redemption  value




15,736 




20,584

     

- 33 -

     
     
     

<PAGE>

   

Partners' Capital

   

General partner (219,567 units outstanding
  in 2002 and 2001)


4,729 


4,873 

Limited partner (12,764,772 and
  12,135,394 units   issued and
  outstanding in 2002 and 2001, respectively)



246,606 



238,924 

Preferred partners (1,200,000 Series B
  Preferred Units, at $25 liquidation preference)


30,000 


30,000 

Preferred partners (2,800,000 Series C
  Preferred Units, at $25 liquidation preference)


70,000 


- -   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 (10,020)

       373 

  Total Partners' Capital

 341,315 

 274,170 

  Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital

$652,337 

$567,838 

See notes to financial statements.

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 34

<PAGE>

SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

                           Year Ended December 31,                   

(dollars in thousands, except per unit data)

  2002  

  2001  

  2000  

       

Revenues

     

 Rental income

$ 99,987 

$ 89,116 

$ 88,208 

 Other operating income

     2,154 

     1,896 

    1,944 

  Total operating revenues

102,141 

91,012 

90,152 

       

Expenses

     

 Property operations and maintenance

24,284 

20,517 

19,329 

 Real estate taxes

9,265 

7,981 

7,718 

 General and administrative

8,586 

8,026 

5,786 

 Depreciation and amortization

17,392 

15,035 

14,273 

   Total operating expenses

59,527 

51,559 

47,106 

       

 Income from operations

42,614 

39,453 

43,046 

       

Other income (expenses)

     

Interest expense

(14,664)

(13,940)

(17,708)

Interest income

356 

395 

197 

Minority interest - consolidated joint venture

  (810)

  (75)

     -    

Equity in losses of joint ventures

      (15)

     (102)

     (177)

       

Income before gain on sale of real estate

27,481 

25,731 

25,358 

Gain on sale of real estate

     -    

      -    

    2,161 

Net Income

 27,481 

 25,731 

 27,519 

Preferred unit distributions

   (5,093)

   (2,955)

   (2,955)

Net income available to common unitholders

$ 22,388 

$ 22,776 

$ 24,564 

       

Per Common Unit:

     

Earnings per common unit - basic

$  1.67 

$  1.78 

$  1.90 

Earnings per common unit - diluted

$  1.65 

$  1.74 

$  1.90 

       

Distributions declared per common unit

$  2.38 

$  2.34 

$  2.30 

See notes to financial statements.

- 35-

<PAGE>

Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership
Statements of Partners' Capital



(Dollars in thousands)

Sovran
Holdings, Inc.
General Partner

Sovran Self
Storage Inc.
Limited Partner


Preferred B
Partners


Preferred C
Partners

Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Income

Total
Partners'
Capital


Limited Partners'
Capital Interest

               

Balance January 1, 2000

      $  5,283 

   $ 260,267 

   $ 30,000 

$       -     

$     -     

  $ 295,550 

   $ 15,888 


Proceeds from issuance of Partnership Units


- -   


2,064 


- -     


- -     


- -     


2,064 


- -     

Earned portion of restricted stock

-   

137 

-     

-     

-     

137 

-     

Purchase of treasury shares

-   

(7,784)

-     

-     

-     

(7,784)

-     

Deferred compensation

-   

50 

-     

-     

-     

50 

-     

Net income

469 

25,238 

-     

-     

-     

25,707 

1,812 

Distributions

(559)

(30,073)

-     

-     

-     

(30,632)

(1,962)

Adjustment to reflect limited partners'
  redeemable capital at balance sheet date


       (22)


     (1,194)


       -     


       -     

-     


     (1,216)


     1,216 

Balance December 31, 2000

    5,171 

 248,705 

 30,000 

  -  

  -  

 283,876 

  16,954 


Proceeds from issuance of Partnership Units


- -   


5,209 


- -     


- -     


- -     


5,209 


- -     

Redemption of Partnership Units

-   

1,868 

-     

-     

-     

1,868 

(5,646)

Exercise of stock options

-   

1,096 

-     

-     

-     

1,096 

-     

Earned portion of restricted stock

-   

424 

-     

-     

-     

424 

-     

Purchase of treasury shares

-   

(1,809)

-     

-     

-     

(1,809)

-     

Deferred compensation

-   

69 

-     

-     

-     

69 

-     

Net income

429 

23,760 

-     

-     

-     

24,189 

1,532 

Increase in fair value of derivatives

-   

-   

-     

-     

373 

373 

-     

Total comprehensive income

-   

-   

-     

-     

-     

24,562 

1,532 

Distributions

(560)

(31,093)

-     

-     

-     

(31,653)

(1,728)

Adjustment to reflect limited partners'
  redeemable capital at balance sheet date


       (167)


     (9,305)


      -     


      -     

-     


     (9,472)


     9,472 

- 36-

<PAGE>

Balance December 31, 2001

$   4,873 

$ 238,924 

$  30,000 

$-     

$   373 

$ 274,170 

$  20,584 


Proceeds from issuance of Partnership Units


- -   


16,446 


- -     


- -     


- -     


16,446 


- -     

Redemption of Partnership Units

-   

(150)

-     

-     

-     

(150)

(3,163)

Issuance of 8.375% Series C Units

-   

(2,124)

-     

70,000  

-     

67,876 

-     

Exercise of stock options

-   

5,648 

-     

-     

-     

5,648 

-     

Earned portion of restricted stock

-   

430 

-     

-     

-     

430 

-     

Purchase of treasury shares

-   

(5,188)

-     

-     

-     

(5,188)

-     

Deferred compensation

-   

89 

-     

-     

-     

89 

-     

Net income

433 

25,868 

-     

-     

-     

26,301 

1,180 

Decrease in fair value of derivatives

-   

-   

-     

-     

(10,393)

(10,393)

-     

Total comprehensive income

-   

-   

-     

-     

-     

15,908 

1,180 

Distributions

(603)

(34,847)

-     

-     

-     

(35,450)

(1,329)

Adjustment to reflect limited partners'
  redeemable capital at balance sheet date


          26 


      1,510 


         -     


           -     


              -     


      1,536 


    (1,536)

Balance December 31, 2002

$    4,729 

$ 246,606 

$  30,000 

$  70,000   

$      (10,020)

$ 341,315 

$  15,736 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 37 -

<PAGE>

SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

Year Ended December 31,       

(dollars in thousands)

  2002  

  2001  

  2000  

       

Operating Activities

     

Net income

$ 27,481 

$ 25,721 

$ 27,519 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
  provided by operating activities:

     

Write-off of deferred financing costs

-    

-    

211 

Depreciation and amortization

17,392 

15,035 

14,273 

Gain on sale of real estate

-    

-    

(2,161)

Equity in losses of joint ventures

15 

102 

177 

Minority interest

810 

85 

Restricted stock earned

430 

424 

137 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

     

 Accounts receivable

(587)

91 

20 

 Fees receivable from joint ventures

-    

711 

(711)

 Prepaid expenses

13 

(472)

(70)

 Accounts payable and other liabilities

220 

(626)

203 

 Deferred revenue

    (164)

    (149)

    (170)

Net cash provided by operating activities

45,610 

40,922 

39,428 

       

Investing Activities

     

 Additions to storage facilities

(97,150)

(31,483)

(23,390)

 (Advances) reimbursement of advances to joint
    ventures


(2,118)


14,654 


(514)

 Receipts from (advances to) related parties

24 

1,885 

(1,370)

 Other assets

        -    

      (2,807)

        -    

Net cash used in investing activities

(99,244)

(17,751)

(25,274)

       

Financing Activities

     

 Net proceeds from sale of partnership units

22,034 

6,374 

2,064 

 Net proceeds from sale of preferred units and
   common unit warrants


67,876 


- -    


- -    

 (Paydown of) proceeds from line of credit

(6,000)

10,000 

1,000 

 (Paydown of) proceeds from term note

(30,000)

-    

30,000 

 Proceeds from mortgage financing

48,000 

-    

-    

 Financing costs

(460)

(398)

(3,388)

 Distributions paid

(37,646)

(33,065)

(32,627)

 Distributions from unconsolidated joint venture

1,032 

-    

-    

 Purchase of treasury stock

(5,188)

(1,809)

(7,784)

 Redemption of operating partnership units

(3,163)

(3,778)

-    

 Mortgage principal payments

     (2,671)

          (33)

     (3,030)

       

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

53,814 

   (22,709)

   (13,765)

- 38 -

<PAGE>

Net increase in cash

180 

462 

389 

Cash at beginning of period

      1,883 

      1,421 

      1,032 

Cash at end of period

$   2,063 

$   1,883 

$   1,421 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

  2002  

  2001  

  2000  

Supplemental cash flow information

     

Cash paid for interest

$ 14,465 

$ 14,416 

$ 16,948 

       

Capital lease obligations incurred

 2,183 

-    

-    

Storage facilities acquired through issuance of
  an ownership interest in the consolidated joint venture


- -    


17,000 


- -    

Note receivable from sale of storage facilities to
  joint venture


- -    


- -    


15,000 

Investment in joint venture received as part of sale
  of storage facilities


- -    


- -    


2,834 

Storage facilities acquired through assumption
  of mortgage


- -    


- -    


- -    

Fair value of net liabilities assumed on the acquisition
  of storage facilities


559 


165 


83 

Distributions declared but unpaid at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $8,124, $7,683, and $7,472, respectively.

See notes to financial statements.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership - December 31, 2002

1.  ORGANIZATION

          Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the "Company"), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets. In 1995, the Company was formed under Maryland law and the Operating Partnership was organized as a Delaware limited partnership to continue and to expand the self-storage operations of the Company's privately owned predecessor organizations. On June 26, 1995, the Company commenced operations, through the Operating Partnership, effective with the completion of its initial public offering of 5,890,000 shares. At December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned and/or managed 264 self-storage properties under the "Uncle Bob's Self Storage"® trade name in 21 states.

 

 

 

- 39 -

<PAGE>

          As of December 31, 2002, the Company was a 95.90% economic owner of the Operating Partnership and controls it through Sovran Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in Delaware and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership (this structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT"). The board of directors of Holdings, the members of which are also members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of Holdings. The Company's limited partner and indirect general partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitle the Company to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners.

         The other limited partners of the Operating Partnership are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain self-storage properties to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each unit of limited partnership ("Unit") at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock ("Common Shares") at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any Unit presented for redemption for one Common Share or cash. The Company presently anticipates that it will elect to issue Common Shares to acquire Units presented for redemption, rather than paying cash. With each such redemption the Company's percentage ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever the Company issues Common Shares, the Company is obligated to contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operati ng Partnership and the Operating Partnership is obligated to issue an equivalent number of Units to the Company. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners' capital interest" in the accompanying balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. Capital activity with regard to such limited partners' redemption rights is reflected in the accompanying statements of partners' capital.

2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

          Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the accounts of the Operating Partnership and Locke Sovran II, LLC, which is a majority controlled joint venture. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Investments in joint ventures which are not majority owned are reported using the equity method.

          Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Operating Partnership considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

          Revenue and Expense Recognition: Rental income is recorded when earned. Rental income received prior to the start of the rental period is included in deferred revenue. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 were $0.6 million, $0.4 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.

          Other Income: Consists primarily of sales of storage-related merchandise (locks and packing supplies), management fees, and commissions from truck rentals.

 

 

- 40 -

<PAGE>

          Investment in Storage Facilities: Storage facilities are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of forty years for buildings and improvements, and five to twenty years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

          Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the basis of the Operating Partnership's property may not be recoverable, the Operating Partnership's policy is to assess any impairment of value. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the property, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, no assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy and, accordingly, this policy had no impact on the Operating Partnership's financial position or results of operations.

          Other Assets: Included in other assets are intangible assets of $2.0 million and a note receivable of $2.8 million. The intangible assets at December 31, 2002, consist primarily of loan acquisition costs of approximately $4.0 million, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $2.0 million. Loan acquisition costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt. Amortization expense was $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $0.9 million for the periods ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The note receivable of $2.8 million represents a note from certain investors of Locke Sovran II, LLC. The note bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.4% and matures upon the dissolution of Locke Sovran II, LLC.

          Stock-Based Compensation: In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Operating Partnership has elected to continue applying the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership does not recognize compensation expense for stock options when the stock option price at the grant date is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock at that date. The following illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per unit if the Operating Partnership had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except for earnings per unit information):

 

                      Pro Forma                   

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  2002  

  2001  

  2000  

Net income available to common unitholders
  as reported


$ 22,388


$ 22,766


$ 24,564

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
  Expense determined under fair value method for
  all awards



   (202)



   (188)



   (110)

Pro forma net income available to common
  unitholders


$  22,186


$  22,578


$  24,454

Earnings per common unit

     

   Basic - as reported

$      1.67

$      1.75

$      1.90

- 41 -

<PAGE>

   Basic - pro forma

$      1.66

$      1.74

$      1.89

   Diluted - as reported

$      1.65

$      1.74

$      1.90

   Diluted - pro forma

$      1.64

$      1.72

$      1.89

          Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per unit is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Operating Partnership had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for the stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.0% for 2002, 5.0% for 2001, and 6.5% for 2000; dividend yield of 8.0% for 2002, 10.7% for 2001, and 11% for 2000; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of .21 for 2002, and .23 for 2001 and .21 for 2000. The average fair value of options granted was $1.98 in 2002, $.93 in 2001, and $.90 in 2000.

          Minority Interest:  The minority interest reflects the joint venture partner's interest in Locke Sovran II, LLC. Amounts allocated to the joint venture partners are reflected as an expense in the income statement and increase the minority interest in the balance sheet. Distributions to these partners reduce this balance.

          Income Taxes:  No provision has been made for income taxes in the accompanying financial statements since the Operating Partnership qualifies as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and its partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their income tax returns.

          Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and the change in value of derivatives used for hedging purposes and is reported in the consolidated statements of partners' capital. Comprehensive income was $15.9 million and $24.6 million and $25.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

          Derivative Financial Instruments: On January 1, 2001, the Operating Partnership adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, which requires companies to carry all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Operating Partnership determines the fair value of derivatives by reference to quoted market prices. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. The Operating Partnership's use of derivative instruments is limited to cash flow hedges, as defined in SFAS No. 133, of certain interest rate risks.

          Recent Accounting Pronouncement: In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets which supersedes SFAS No. 121 Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of. Although retaining many of the provisions of SFAS No. 121, SFAS No. 144 establishes a uniform accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of. SFAS 144 also extends the reporting of a discontinued operation to a component of an entity. The Operating

 

 

- 42 -

<PAGE>

Partnership's adoption of this statement in the first quarter of 2002 did not have an impact on the Operating Partnership's financial results.

          In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. It rescinds SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item. The Operating Partnership adopted this standard in 2002 resulting in reclassification of its 2000 loss on extinguishment of debt of $211,000 from an extraordinary item to interest expense.

          In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which requires the recognition of expense when the liability is incurred and not as a result of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. The statement is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 in the first quarter of 2003 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Operating Partnership's financial results.

          In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 148, which is effective for years ending after December 15, 2002, provides alternative methods for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and requires prominent disclosure about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Operating Partnership's adoption of SFAS No. 148 in 2002 enhanced stock-based employee compensation disclosures and had no effect on the method of accounting followed by the Operating Partnership, as the Operating Partnership continues to apply the provisions of APB 25.

          Reclassification: Certain amounts from the 2001 and 2000 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

          Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

3.  EARNINGS PER UNIT

          The Operating Partnership reports earnings per unit data in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." In computing earnings per unit, the Operating Partnership excludes preferred unit distributions from net income to arrive at net income available to common unitholders. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common unit.

 

 

- 43 -

<PAGE>


(Amounts in thousands,
except per unit data)                                          

Year Ended  
December 31,
       2002       

Year Ended  
December 31,
        2001      

Year Ended  
December 31,
        2000      


Numerator:
                                                                          
  Net income available to common unitholders




$ 22,388 




$ 22,766 




$ 24,564 


Denominator
  Denominator for basic earnings per unit -
  weighted average units




13,376 




12,991 




12,920 


Effect of Dilutive Securities:
  Stock options                                                 



       179 



        101 



           1 

  Denominator for diluted earnings per unit -
    adjusted weighted - average units and     assumed conversion                                    



  13,555 



  13,092 



  12,921 


Basic Earnings per Common Unit                  


$    1.67 


$    1.75 


$    1.90 


Diluted Earnings per Common Unit               


$    1.65 


$    1.74 


$    1.90 

          Potential common units from the Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock and related warrants, see Note 12, were excluded from the 2002 diluted earnings per unit calculation because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per unit.

4.  INVESTMENT IN STORAGE FACILITIES

          The following summarizes activity in storage facilities during the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

(Dollars in thousands)                                    

   2002   

   2001   

Cost:

   

  Beginning balance

$611,289 

$562,721 

  Property acquisitions

81,819 

30,269 

  Improvements and equipment additions

17,934 

18,527 

  Dispositions                                           

      (201)

       (228)


Ending balance                                        


$710,841 


$611,289 


Accumulated Depreciation:

   

  Beginning balance

$ 59,091 

$ 45,253 

  Additions during the year

16,344 

13,918 

  Dispositions                                          

        (91)

        (80)

 

- 44 -

 

<PAGE>


Ending balance                                       


$ 75,344 


$ 59,091 

 

5.  UNSECURED LINE OF CREDIT AND TERM NOTE

          The Operating Partnership has a $150 million revolving line of credit due November 2003 at LIBOR plus 1.375% and a $75 million term loan due November 2003 (extendable, at the Operating Partnership's option, to November 2005) at LIBOR plus 1.75%. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2002 on the Operating Partnership's credit facility before the effect of interest rate swaps was approximately 3.0% (3.5% at December 31, 2001). At December 31, 2002, there was $22 million available on the line of credit.

          The net carrying amount of the Operating Partnership's debt instruments approximates fair value.

 

6.  MORTGAGE PAYABLE AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

          In February 2002, the consolidated joint venture (Locke Sovran II, LLC) entered into a mortgage note of $48 million. The note is secured by the 27 properties owned by the joint venture with a cost of $79 million. The 10-year mortgage bears interest at the fixed rate of 7.19%. The outstanding balance on the mortgage is $47.5 million at December 31, 2002. Principal maturities of the mortgage for the next five years are as follows: 2003, $0.7 million; 2004, $0.7 million; 2005, $0.8 million; 2006, $0.9 million; and 2007, $0.9 million.

          During 2002, the Operating Partnership entered into lease agreements, qualifying as capital leases, for trucks to be used at its storage facilities. The outstanding balance on these capital lease obligations is $1.9 million at December 31, 2002. Principal maturities for capital lease obligations are as follows: 2003, $0.5 million; 2004, $0.5 million; 2005, $0.6 million; and 2006, $0.3 million.

          The Operating Partnership has a $150 million revolving line of credit due November 2003 at LIBOR plus 1.375%, a $75 million term loan due November 2003 (extendable, at the Operating Partnership's option to November 2005) at LIBOR plus 1.75%, and a $30 million term loan due November 2002 at LIBOR plus 1.375%. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2001 on the Operating Partnership's credit facility before the effect of interest rate swaps was approximately 3.5% (8.2% at December 31, 2000). At December 31, 2001, there was $16 million available on the line of credit.

          The Operating Partnership recorded an extraordinary loss on the extinguishment of debt of $211,000 in 2000, representing the unamortized financing costs of credit facilities that were refinanced during 2000.

          The net carrying amount of the Operating Partnership's debt instruments approximates fair value.

 

- 45 -

<PAGE>

7.  DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

          Interest rate swaps are used to adjust the proportion of total debt that is subject to variable and fixed interest rates. The interest rate swaps require the Operating Partnership to pay an amount equal to a specific fixed rate of interest times a notional principal amount and to receive in return an amount equal to a variable rate of interest times the same notional amount. The notional amounts are not changed. No other cash payments are made unless the contract is terminated prior to its maturity, in which case the contract would likely be settled for an amount equal to its net present value. The Operating Partnership enters interest rate swaps with a number of major financial institutions to minimize counterparty credit risk.

          The interest rate swaps qualify and are designated as hedges of the amount of future cash flows related to interest payments on variable rate debt. Therefore, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and the related gains or losses are deferred in partners' capital as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI"). These deferred gains and losses are amortized into interest expense during the period or periods in which the related interest payments affect earnings. However, to the extent that the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in value of the interest payments being hedged, the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in earnings immediately. Ineffectiveness was immaterial in 2002 and 2001.

          The Operating Partnership has entered into three interest rate swap agreements, one in March 2001 for $50 million and two in September 2001 for $50 million and $30 million, to effectively convert a total of $130 million of variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. One of the $50 million interest rate swap agreements matures in November 2005, the other matures in October 2006, and the $30 million swap agreement matures in September 2008.

          The 2001 interest rate swap agreements are the only derivative instruments, as defined by SFAS No. 133, held by the Operating Partnership; as such, there was no impact upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 at January 1, 2001. During 2002 and 2001, the net reclassification from AOCI to interest expense was $4.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, based on payments made under the swap agreements. Based on current interest rates, the Operating Partnership estimates that payments under the interest rate swaps will be approximately $4.5 million in 2003. Payments made under the interest rate swap agreements will be reclassified to interest expense as settlements occur. The fair value of the swap agreements at December 31, 2002 was a $10 million liability.

 

8.  STOCK OPTIONS

          The Company established the 1995 Award and Option Plan (the "Plan") for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company's executive officers and other key employees. 1,500,000 shares were authorized for issuance under the Plan. The options vest ratably over four and five years, and must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price for qualified incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. As of December 31, 2002, options for 647,275 shares were outstanding under the Plan and 383,360 shares of common stock were available for future issuance.

- 46 -

<PAGE>

          The Company also established the 1995 Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan (the Non-employee Plan) for the purpose of attracting and retaining the services of experienced and knowledgeable outside directors. The Non-employee Plan provides for the annual granting of options to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock to each eligible director. Such options vest over a one-year period for initial awards and immediately upon subsequent grants. The total shares reserved under the Non-employee Plan is 100,000. The exercise price for options granted under the Non-employee Plan is equal to fair market value at date of grant. As of December 31, 2002, options for 87,500 shares were outstanding under the Non-employee Plan.

          The Company has also issued 132,340 shares of restricted stock to employees which vest over four and five year periods. The fair market value of the restricted stock on the date of grant ranged from $20.38 to $31.65. The Company charges unearned restricted stock, a component of partners' capital, for the market value of shares as they are issued. The unearned portion is then amortized and charged to expense over the vesting period.

          A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31 follows:

 

 

            2002            

               2001             

              2000            

 




Options

Weighted
average
exercise
price




Options

Weighted
average
exercise
price




Options

Weighted
average
exercise
price

                                                                                                                                                                 

Outstanding at beginning of year:


902,550 


$   23.14 


639,050 


$   23.67 


433,050 


$   25.32 

             

Granted

80,000 

30.92 

329,500 

21.71 

212,000 

19.19 

Exercised

(247,775)

22.80 

(52,500)

20.77 

-    

-    

Forfeited

-    

-    

(13,500)

20.75 

(6,000)

19.06 

                                                                                                                                                                 

Outstanding at end of
  year


734,775 


$    23.08 


902,550 


$    23.14 


639,050 


$    23.67 

                                                                                                                                                                 

Exercisable at end of
  year


317,030 


$    25.39 


417,370 


$    24.55 


328,743 


$    24.24 

          Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2002 ranged from $19.07 to $31.68. The weighted average remaining contractual life of those options is 6.57 years. As disclosed further in Note 12, warrants to purchase 379,166 common shares of the Company at a price of $32.60 per share are outstanding at December 31, 2002.

 

- 47 -

<PAGE>

9.  RETIREMENT PLAN

          Employees of the Company qualifying under certain age and service requirements are eligible to be a participant in a 401(k) Plan, which became effective September 1, 1997. The Company contributes to the Plan at the rate of 50% of the first 4% of gross wages that the employee contributes. Total expense to the Company was approximately $92,000, $63,000, and $60,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

 

10.  SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN

          In November 1996, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of common stock. Under certain conditions, each Right may be exercised to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $75, subject to adjustment. The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group has acquired 10% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, or following the commencement of a tender or exchange offer for 10% or more of such outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. If a person or group acquires more than 10% of the then outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise, common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. In addition, if the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction , each Right will entitle its holder to purchase that number of the acquiring Company's common shares having a market value of twice the Right's exercise price. The Company will be entitled to redeem the Rights at $.01 per Right at any time prior to the earlier of the expiration of the Rights in November 2006 or the time that a person has acquired a 10% position. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights, and until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on the Company's earnings.

 

11.  INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

          Investment in joint ventures includes an ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, which operates 11 self-storage facilities throughout the United States, and an ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Operating Partnership's headquarters and other tenants.

          In December 2000, the Operating Partnership contributed seven self-storage properties to Locke Sovran I, LLC with a fair market value of $19.8 million, in exchange for a $15 million 1 year note receivable bearing interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% that was repaid in 2001, and a 45% interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC. This transaction resulted in a gain on the disposal of the properties of approximately $4.3 million; $1.9 million of this gain was deferred as a result of the Operating Partnership's continuing ownership interest in Locke Sovran I, LLC, as such the initial investment, including cash funding, was recorded at $3.1 million. The deferred gain is being amortized over the life of the properties, consistent with the depreciation expense recorded by Locke Sovran I, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Locke Sovran I, LLC's loss was $12,500 and the amortization of the deferred gain was

- 48 -

<PAGE>

$40,000, both of which are recorded as equity in losses of joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income.

          The Operating Partnership also has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2002. The majority of the $1.6 million investment relates to interest bearing loans made by the Operating Partnership to the joint venture. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership's share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC's loss was $42,000. The Operating Partnership paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $255,000 in 2002 and 2001.

          A summary of the unconsolidated joint ventures' financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is as follows:

(dollars in thousands)

Locke Sovran I,
       LLC          

 Iskalo Office  
Holdings, LLC 

Balance Sheet Data:

   

Investment in storage facilities, net

$40,099 

$           - 

Investment in office building

6,903 

Other assets

     1,952 

         471 

  Total Assets

$ 42,051 

$    7,374 

Due to the Operating Partnership

$   2,023 

$   1,574 

Demand note payable

 -  

       900 

Mortgage payable

30,269 

5,800 

Other liabilities

       706 

       137 

  Total Liabilities

32,998 

8,411 

Unaffiliated partners' equity (deficiency)

4,913 

(529)

Company equity (deficiency)

    4,140 

      (508)

  Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficiency)

$ 42,051 

$   7,374 

Income Statement Data:

   

Total revenues

$   5,807 

$      815 

Total expenses

    5,835 

       901 

  Net loss

$     (28)

$      (86)

          The Operating Partnership does not guarantee the debt of Locke Sovran I, LLC; it does guarantee the $900,000 demand note payable of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC.

 

12.  PREFERRED STOCK

Series A

          The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 250,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock with a $.01 par value. Upon issuance pursuant to the Shareholder Rights Plan (see note 10), the Series A Junior Preferred Stock will have certain voting, dividend and liquidation preferences over common stock, as described in the Form 8-K filed December 3, 1996.

 

- 49 -

<PAGE>

Series B

          On July 30, 1999, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The offering price was $25 per share resulting in net proceeds of $28.6 million after expenses. The Series B Preferred Stock is not redeemable until on or after July 30, 2004, at which time the Company may redeem the shares at $25.00 per share ($30,000,000 aggregate), plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The shares may be redeemed only with the proceeds of certain sales of equity securities. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September, and December at a rate of $2.4625 per annum per share.

          Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights. However, if the Company does not pay dividends on the Series B shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the shares, voting as a class with the holders of any other class or series of stock with similar voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to serve on the Board of Directors until all Series B dividends that are accrued are paid.

Series C

          On July 3, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the issuance of 2,800,000 shares of 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred") in a privately negotiated transaction. The Company immediately issued 1,600,000 shares of the Series C Preferred and issued the remaining 1,200,000 shares on November 27, 2002. The offering price was $25.00 per share resulting in net proceeds for the Series C Preferred and related common stock warrants of $67.9 million.

          The Series C Preferred has a fixed annual dividend rate equal to the greater of 8.375% or the actual dividend paid on the number of the Company's common shares into which the Series C Preferred is convertible. The Series C Preferred is convertible at a ratio of .76687 common shares for each Series C Preferred share and can be redeemed at the Company's option on or after November 30, 2007 at $25.00 per share ($70,000,000 aggregate) plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the Series C Preferred are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each March, June, September, and December at a rate of $2.09375 per annum per share.

          Holders of the Series C Preferred generally have no voting rights. However, if the Company does not pay dividends on the Series C Preferred shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive), the holders of the shares, voting as a class with the holders of any other class or series of stock with similar voting rights, will be entitled to vote for the election of two additional directors to serve on the Board of Directors until the Series C Preferred dividends are paid.

          In addition, the Company issued warrants to the Series C Preferred investors to purchase 379,166 common shares of the Company at a price of $32.60 per share that expire November 30, 2007. Using the Black-Scholes method, the warrants had a fair value at the issue date of $1.97 per common share covered by the warrants. Also, an entity related to one of the investors received a placement certificate that entitles it to receive cash from the Company in the amount

- 50 -

<PAGE>

of 650,000 multiplied by the excess of the fair market value of the Company's common stock over $32.60 on the date the certificate is exercised. This arrangement expires on November 30, 2007. Based upon the Company's common stock price at December 31, 2002, no amount is currently payable under this arrangement.

          The Company recorded a deemed dividend of $0.2 million in 2002 in connection with the issuance of the Series C Preferred. The deemed dividend represents the calculated value of the beneficial conversion feature that existed on July 3, 2002, the date of issuance of the Series C Preferred. The beneficial conversion feature is calculated as the excess of, on the date of issuance of the Series C Preferred, the fair value of the common stock into which the Series C Preferred is convertible, over the issuance amount allocated to the Series C Preferred.

          The Series B and C Preferred Stock are recorded as Preferred Partners' Units in the Operating Partnership's balance sheet

 

13.  SUPPLEMENTARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

          The following is a summary of quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in thousands, except per unit data).

 

2002 Quarter Ended

 

March 31  

June 30  

Sept. 30  

Dec. 31  

Operating revenue

$ 24,167 

$ 25,177 

$ 26,249 

$ 26,548 

Net Income

$   6,411 

$   6,956 

$   7,117 

$   6,997 

Net income available to common
  unitholders


$   5,670 


$   6,217 


$   5,329 


$   5,172 

Net Income Per Common Unit
  (Note 3):

       

  Basic

$     0.43 

$     0.47 

$     0.39 

$     0.38 

  Diluted

$     0.43 

$     0.47 

$     0.39 

$     0.37 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 51 -

<PAGE>

 

2001 Quarter Ended

 

March 31  

June 30  

Sept. 30  

Dec. 31  

Operating revenue

$ 22,125 

$ 22,675 

$ 23,435 

$ 22,826 

Net Income

$   5,722 

$   6,854 

$   7,738 

$   5,407 

Net income available to common
  unitholders


$   4,983 


$   6,115 


$   6,999 


$   4,669 

Net Income Per Common Unit
  (Note 3):

       

  Basic

$     0.39 

$     0.47 

$     0.54 

$     0.35 

  Diluted

$     0.39 

$     0.47 

$     0.53 

$     0.35 

          Quarterly operating revenue amounts disclosed above differ from previously reported amounts due to a reclassification of interest income from operating revenue. The Operating Partnership's net income in the fourth quarter of 2001 was impacted by a $1.7 million expense in connection with a lawsuit settlement described in Note 15.

 

14.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

          The Operating Partnership's current practice is to conduct environmental investigations in connection with property acquisitions. At this time, the Operating Partnership is not aware of any environmental contamination of any of its facilities that individually or in the aggregate would be material to the Operating Partnership's overall business, financial condition, or results of operations.

 

15.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

          A former business associate (the "Plaintiff") of certain officers and directors of the Company, including Robert J. Attea, Kenneth F. Myszka, David L. Rogers and Charles E. Lannon (the "Founding Shareholders"), commenced a lawsuit against the Company on June 13, 1995 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint in the lawsuit alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, breach of general partnership/joint venture arrangement, breach of duty of good faith, fraud and deceit, and other causes of action including declaratory judgment as to the Plaintiff's continuing interest in the Company. The Plaintiff sought money damages in excess of $15 million, as well as punitive damages and declaratory and injunctive relief (including the imposition of a constructive trust on assets of the Company in which the Plaintiff claimed to have a continuing interest) an d an accounting. The amended complaint also added the Founding Shareholders as additional defendants. In April 2000, following trial, the jury rendered a verdict adverse to the Company with respect to the Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract and breach of general partnership/joint venture arrangement and found total compensatory damages in the amount of $6,462,068. The Company filed a post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for a new trial. Although the motion for judgment as a matter of law was denied, the motion for a new trial was granted and a new trial was scheduled. Prior to the commencement of the new trial, the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit and the Company paid

- 52 -

<PAGE>

$2,359,174 to the Plaintiff in settlement of all claims. In addition, legal fees and related expenses totaling $1,686,000 were paid by the Company in connection with the lawsuit, and $781,000 was paid in connection with its own counterclaim against the Plaintiff. Pursuant to their agreement with the Company to pay certain costs and losses arising from the lawsuit, the Founding Shareholders made payment to the Company in April 2001 of $1,785,000 and in November 2001 by the redemption of 46,528 shares of the Company's common stock owned by them having a market value of approximately $1,360,000. The cost to the Operating Partnership, after indemnification by the Founding Shareholders, was $1.7 million.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 53 -

<PAGE>

Report of Independent Auditors

 

The Board of Directors and Partners
Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership

          We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the management of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

          We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

 

 

Ernst & Young LLP
Buffalo, New York
January 28, 2003

- 54 -

<PAGE>

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

          None.

Part III

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

          Through Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company controls the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership has no directors, or executive officers. Consequently, this information incorporated by reference reflects information with respect to the directors and executive officers of the Company and Holdings.

          The information required is incorporated by reference to "Election of Directors", including "Executive Officers of the Company" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

          Through Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company controls the Operating Partnership. The Board of Directors of Holdings, the members of which are the same as the members of the Board of Directors of the Company, manages the affairs of the Operating Partnership by directing the affairs of the general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Directors and Officers of Holdings receive their compensation from the Company and are not separately compensated by Holdings. Consequently, the information incorporated by reference reflects compensation paid to the Directors and executive officers of the Company.

          The information required is incorporated by reference to "Executive Compensation" and "Compensation of Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

          The Operating Partnership has no directors or officers. No director or officer of the Company or Holdings beneficially owns any Units.

          At December 31, 2002, the Company beneficially owns 12,984,339 Units which constitute 95.90% of all outstanding Units. No other person holds more than a 5% beneficial ownership in the Operating Partnership.

 

- 55 -

<PAGE>

          The information required herein for the Company is incorporated by reference to "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 15, 2003.

 

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

          During 2002, the Operating Partnership issued Units in private placements in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in the amounts and for the consideration set forth below:

   

-

On January 24, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $793,244 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 26,822 Units.

-

On January 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 30,000 Units to the Company.

-

On February 14, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 52,969 Units from a partner.

-

On February 21, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 43,895 Units from a partner.

-

On February 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $755,248 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 24,707 Units.

-

On February 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 41,875 Units to the Company.

-

On March 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $665,704 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 22,388 Units.

-

On March 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 4,000 Units to the Company.

-

On April 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,385,301 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 45,224 Units.

 

- 56 -

<PAGE>

-

On April 29, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 2,500 Units to the Company.

-

On May 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $891,538 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 29,574 Units.

-

On May 31, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 66,750 Units to the Company.

-

On June 24, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $3,150,110 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 101,483 Units.

-

On June 28, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 94,650 Units to the Company.

-

On July 1, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 6,775 Units from a partner.

-

On July 2, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, the Operating Partnership issued 8,000 Units to the Company.

-

On July 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,804,450 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 96,754 Units.

-

On August 5, 2002, in connection with the Company's incentive compensation plan, the Operating Partnership issued 18,500 Units to the Company.

-

On August 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $2,197,152 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 72,613 Units.

-

On September 23, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $980,067 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 32,806 Units.

-

On October 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $1,867,420 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 67,650 Units.

 
 

- 57 -

<PAGE>

-

On November 22, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $393,238 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 14,222 Units.

-

On December 23, 2002, in connection with the Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the Company transferred $416,568 to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 15,477 Units.

-

On December 30, 2002, the Operating Partnership redeemed 2,310 Units from a partner.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

          The information required herein is incorporated by reference to "Certain Transactions" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2003.

Item 14.

Controls and Procedures

          The chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of the general partner of the Operating Partnership have evaluated the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2002. Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be in this annual report is made known to them by others on a timely basis. There have not been changes in the Operating Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of this evaluation.

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)

Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

1.

The following consolidated financial statements of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership are included in Item 8.

 

(i)

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001.

 

(ii)

Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000.

 

(iii)

Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000.

 

(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000.

 

(v)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 
 

- 58 -

<PAGE>

2.

The following financial statement Schedule as of the period ended December 31, 2002 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.

          All other Consolidated financial schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

3.

(a) Exhibits - See the Exhibit Index beginning on page 69 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K.
    None.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 59 -

<PAGE>

Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership

Schedule III
Combined Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(in thousands)
December 31, 2002

 



Initial
                      Cost to Company               

Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition



Gross Amount at Which
               Carried at Close of Period              

   
                     



Description



ST


Encum
brance



Land  

Building,    
Equipment and
Improvements 

Building,    
Equipment and
Improvements 



Land  

Building,    
Equipment and
Improvements 



Total  


Accumulated
Depreciation



Acquired

                     

Boston-Metro I

MA

 

$    363

$  1,679       

$   303          

$   363

$  1,982       

$  2,345

$   365       

6/26/95

Boston-Metro II

MA

 

680

1,616       

208          

680

1,824       

2,504

338       

6/26/95

E. Providence

RI

 

345

1,268       

186          

345

1,454       

1,799

278       

6/26/95

Charleston I

SC

 

416

1,516       

237          

416

1,753       

2,169

361       

6/26/95

Lakeland I

FL

 

397

1,424       

176          

397

1,600       

1,997

314       

6/26/95

Charlotte

NC

 

308

1,102       

329          

308

1,431       

1,739

243       

6/26/95

Tallahassee I

FL

 

770

2,734       

1,444          

770

4,178       

4,948

681       

6/26/95

Youngstown

OH

 

239

1,110       

288          

239

1,398       

1,637

299       

6/26/95

Cleveland-Metro I

OH

 

179

836       

399          

179

1,235       

1,414

220       

6/26/95

Cleveland-Metro II

OH

 

701

1,659       

384          

701

2,043       

2,744

377       

6/26/95

Tallahassee II

FL

 

205

734       

583          

205

1,317       

1,522

203       

6/26/95

Pt. St. Lucie

FL

 

395

1,501       

259          

395

1,760       

2,155

374       

6/26/95

Deltona

FL

 

483

1,752       

364          

483

2,116       

2,599

402       

6/26/95

Middletown

NY

 

224

808       

703          

224

1,511       

1,735

256       

6/26/95

Buffalo I

NY

 

423

1,531       

1,104          

498

2,560       

3,058

466       

6/26/95

Rochester I

NY

 

395

1,404       

164          

395

1,568       

1,963

291       

6/26/95

Salisbury

MD

 

164

760       

238          

164

998       

1,162

180       

6/26/95

New Bedford

MA

 

367

1,325       

292          

367

1,617       

1,984

338       

6/26/95

Fayetteville

NC

 

853

3,057       

246          

853

3,303       

4,156

618       

6/26/95

Allentown

PA

 

199

921       

855          

204

1,771       

1,975

268       

6/26/95

Jacksonville I

FL

 

152

728       

240          

152

968       

1,120

222       

6/26/95

Columbia I

SC

 

268

1,248       

223          

268

1,471       

1,739

293       

6/26/95

Rochester II

NY

 

230

847       

237          

235

1,079       

1,314

202       

6/26/95

Savannah I

GA

 

463

1,684       

1,287          

463

2,971       

3,434

436       

6/26/95

Greensboro

NC

 

444

1,613       

363          

444

1,976       

2,420

383       

6/26/95

Raleigh I

NC

 

649

2,329       

345          

649

2,674       

3,323

510       

6/26/95

- 60 -

<PAGE>

New Haven

CT

 

387

1,402       

367          

387

1,769       

2,156

314       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro I

GA

 

844

2,021       

346          

844

2,367       

3,211

447       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro II

GA

 

302

1,103       

169          

303

1,271       

1,574

282       

6/26/95

Buffalo II

NY

 

315

745       

541          

315

1,286       

1,601

197       

6/26/95

Raleigh II

NC

 

321

1,150       

254          

321

1,404       

1,725

278       

6/26/95

Columbia II

SC

 

361

1,331       

187          

375

1,504       

1,879

320       

6/26/95

Columbia III

SC

 

189

719       

224          

189

943       

1,132

210       

6/26/95

Columbia IV

SC

 

488

1,188       

226          

488

1,414       

1,902

309       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro III

GA

 

430

1,579       

196          

430

1,775       

2,205

383       

6/26/95

Orlando I

FL

 

513

1,930       

273          

513

2,203       

2,716

448       

6/26/95

Spartanburg

SC

 

331

1,209       

152          

331

1,361       

1,692

284       

6/26/95

Sharon

PA

 

194

912       

247          

194

1,159       

1,353

231       

6/26/95

Ft. Lauderdale

FL

 

1,503

3,619       

336          

1,503

3,955       

5,458

778       

6/26/95

West Palm I

FL

 

398

1,035       

138          

398

1,173       

1,571

260       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro IV

GA

 

423

1,015       

235          

425

1,248       

1,673

256       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro V

GA

 

483

1,166       

172          

483

1,338       

1,821

276       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro VI

GA

 

308

1,116       

323          

308

1,439       

1,747

316       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro VII

GA

 

170

786       

248          

175

1,029       

1,204

221       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro VIII

GA

 

413

999       

429          

413

1,428       

1,841

303       

6/26/95

Baltimore I

MD

 

154

555       

209          

154

764       

918

153       

6/26/95

Baltimore II

MD

 

479

1,742       

579          

479

2,321       

2,800

412       

6/26/95

Augusta I

GA

 

357

1,296       

351          

357

1,647       

2,004

290       

6/26/95

Macon I

GA

 

231

1,081       

195          

231

1,276       

1,507

251       

6/26/95

Melbourne I

FL

 

883

2,104       

1,346          

883

3,450       

4,333

573       

6/26/95

Newport News

VA

 

316

1,471       

527          

316

1,998       

2,314

383       

6/26/95

Pensacola I

FL

 

632

2,962       

732          

651

3,675       

4,326

704       

6/26/95

Augusta II

GA

 

315

1,139       

392          

315

1,531       

1,846

279       

6/26/95

Hartford-Metro I

CT

 

715

1,695       

412          

715

2,107       

2,822

375       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro IX

GA

 

304

1,118       

456          

304

1,574       

1,878

294       

6/26/95

Alexandria

VA

 

1,375

3,220       

583          

1,375

3,803       

5,178

694       

6/26/95

Pensacola II

FL

 

244

901       

230          

244

1,131       

1,375

273       

6/26/95

Melbourne II

FL

 

834

2,066       

156          

834

2,222       

3,056

510       

6/26/95

Hartford-Metro II

CT

 

234

861       

179          

239

1,035       

1,274

198       

6/26/95

Atlanta-Metro X

GA

 

256

1,244       

190          

256

1,434       

1,690

303       

6/26/95

Norfolk I

VA

 

313

1,462       

538          

313

2,000       

2,313

347       

6/26/95

Norfolk II

VA

 

278

1,004       

207          

278

1,211       

1,489

277       

6/26/95

Birmingham I

AL

 

307

1,415       

260          

307

1,675       

1,982

316       

6/26/95

Birmingham II

AL

 

730

1,725       

366          

730

2,091       

2,821

394       

6/26/95

Montgomery I

AL

 

863

2,041       

327          

863

2,368       

3,231

448       

6/26/95

Jacksonville II

FL

 

326

1,515       

283          

326

1,798       

2,124

334       

6/26/95

Pensacola II

FL

 

369

1,358       

956          

369

2,314       

2,683

392       

6/26/95

Pensacola IV

FL

 

244

1,128       

135          

244

1,263       

1,507

285       

6/26/95

- 61 -

<PAGE>

                   

Pensacola V

FL

 

226

1,046       

437          

226

1,483       

1,709

300       

6/26/95

Tampa I

FL

 

1,088

2,597       

627          

1,088

3,224       

4,312

613       

6/26/95

Tampa II

FL

 

526

1,958       

320          

526

2,278       

2,804

512       

6/26/95

Tampa III

FL

 

672

2,439       

314          

672

2,753       

3,425

557       

6/26/95

Jackson I

MS

 

343

1,580       

189          

343

1,769       

2,112

375       

6/26/95

Jackson II

MS

 

209

964       

398          

209

1,362       

1,571

281       

6/26/95

Richmond

VA

 

443

1,602       

513          

443

2,115       

2,558

399       

8/25/95

Orlando II

FL

 

1,161

2,755       

667          

1,162

3,421       

4,583

622       

9/29/95

Birmingham III

AL

 

424

1,506       

429          

424

1,935       

2,359

426       

1/16/96

Macon II

GA

 

431

1,567       

499          

431

2,066       

2,497

331       

12/1/95

Harrisburg I

PA

 

360

1,641       

311          

360

1,952       

2,312

376       

12/29/95

Harrisburg II

PA

(1)

627

2,224       

541          

648

2,744       

3,392

474       

12/29/95

Syracuse I

NY

 

470

1,712       

567          

472

2,277       

2,749

347       

12/27/95

Ft. Myers

FL

 

205

912       

137          

205

1,049       

1,254

263       

12/28/95

Ft. Myers II

FL

 

412

1,703       

303          

413

2,005       

2,418

488       

12/28/95

Newport News II

VA

 

442

1,592       

126          

442

1,718       

2,160

311       

1/5/96

Montgomery II

AL

 

353

1,299       

192          

353

1,491       

1,844

285       

1/23/96

Charlestown II

SC

 

237

858       

322          

232

1,185       

1,417

210       

3/1/96

Tampa IV

FL

 

766

1,800       

485          

766

2,285       

3,051

347       

3/28/96

Arlington I

TX

 

442

1,767       

202          

442

1,969       

2,411

328       

3/29/96

Arlington II

TX

 

408

1,662       

357          

408

2,019       

2,427

406       

3/29/96

Ft. Worth

TX

 

328

1,324       

131          

328

1,455       

1,783

251       

3/29/96

San Antonio I

TX

 

436

1,759       

394          

436

2,153       

2,589

390       

3/29/96

San Antonio II

TX

 

289

1,161       

330          

289

1,491       

1,780

277       

3/29/96

Syracuse II

NY

 

481

1,559       

1,099          

671

2,468       

3,139

340       

6/5/96

Montgomery III

AL

 

279

1,014       

181          

279

1,195       

1,474

238       

5/21/96

West Palm II

FL

 

345

1,262       

141          

345

1,403       

1,748

249       

5/29/96

Ft. Myers III

FL

 

229

884       

91          

229

975       

1,204

178       

5/29/96

Pittsburgh

PA

 

545

1,940       

193          

545

2,133       

2,678

351       

6/19/96

Lakeland II

FL

 

359

1,287       

854          

359

2,141       

2,500

314       

6/26/96

Springfield

MA

 

251

917       

1,211          

297

2,082       

2,379

295       

6/28/96

Ft. Myers IV

FL

 

344

1,254       

189          

344

1,443       

1,787

246       

6/28/96

Baltimore III

MD

 

777

2,770       

110          

777

2,880       

3,657

472       

7/26/96

Jacksonville III

FL

 

568

2,028       

687          

568

2,715       

3,283

422       

8/23/96

Jacksonville IV

FL

 

436

1,635       

386          

436

2,021       

2,457

354       

8/26/96

Pittsburgh II

PA

 

627

2,257       

731          

631

2,984       

3,615

490       

8/28/96

Jacksonville V

FL

 

535

2,033       

161          

538

2,191       

2,729

416       

8/30/96

Charlotte II

NC

 

487

1,754       

92          

487

1,846       

2,333

295       

9/16/96

Charlotte III

NC

 

315

1,131       

228          

315

1,359       

1,674

205       

9/16/96

Orlando III

FL

 

314

1,113       

495          

314

1,608       

1,922

246       

10/30/96

Rochester III

NY

 

704

2,496       

221          

707

2,714       

3,421

397       

12/20/96

Youngstown II

OH

 

600

2,142       

152          

600

2,294       

2,894

345       

1/10/97

- 62 -

<PAGE>

Akron

OH

 

413

1,478       

116          

413

1,594       

2,007

237       

1/10/97

Cleveland III

OH

 

751

2,676       

504          

751

3,180       

3,931

471       

1/10/97

Cleveland IV

OH

 

725

2,586       

782          

725

3,368       

4,093

493       

1/10/97

Cleveland V

OH

(1)

637

2,918       

660          

641

3,574       

4,215

557       

1/10/97

Cleveland VI

OH

 

495

1,781       

385          

495

2,166       

2,661

332       

1/10/97

Cleveland VII

OH

 

761

2,714       

541          

761

3,255       

4,016

527       

1/10/97

Cleveland VIII

OH

 

418

1,921       

689          

418

2,610       

3,028

427       

1/10/97

Cleveland IX

OH

 

606

2,164       

246          

606

2,410       

3,016

368       

1/10/97

Grand Rapids II

MI

 

219

790       

607          

219

1,397       

1,616

208       

1/17/97

Holland

MI

 

451

1,830       

938          

451

2,768       

3,219

449       

1/17/97

San Antonio III

TX

(1)

474

1,686       

149          

474

1,835       

2,309

275       

1/30/97

Universal

TX

 

346

1,236       

134          

346

1,370       

1,716

207       

1/30/97

San Antonio IV

TX

 

432

1,560       

881          

432

2,441       

2,873

297       

1/30/97

Houston-Eastex

TX

 

634

2,565       

833          

634

3,398       

4,032

407       

3/26/97

Houston-Nederland

TX

 

566

2,279       

150          

566

2,429       

2,995

351       

3/26/97

Houston-College

TX

 

293

1,357       

185          

293

1,542       

1,835

225       

3/26/97

Lynchburg-Lakeside

VA

 

335

1,342       

409          

335

1,751       

2,086

273       

3/31/97

Lynchburg-Timberlake

VA

 

328

1,315       

570          

328

1,885       

2,213

279       

3/31/97

Lynchburg-Amherst

VA

 

155

710       

181          

152

894       

1,046

159       

3/31/97

Christiansburg

VA

 

245

1,120       

135          

245

1,255       

1,500

183       

3/31/97

Chesapeake

VA

 

260

1,043       

449          

260

1,492       

1,752

188       

3/31/97

Danville

VA

 

326

1,488       

42          

326

1,530       

1,856

223       

3/31/97

Orlando-W 25th St.

FL

 

289

1,160       

316          

290

1,475       

1,765

199       

3/31/97

Delray I-Mini

FL

 

491

1,756       

494          

491

2,250       

2,741

333       

4/11/97

Savannah II

GA

 

296

1,196       

133          

296

1,329       

1,625

203       

5/8/97

Delray II-Safeway

FL

 

921

3,282       

287          

921

3,569       

4,490

505       

5/21/97

Cleveland X-Avon

OH

 

301

1,214       

234          

304

1,445       

1,749

213       

6/4/97

Dallas-Skillman

TX

 

960

3,847       

823          

960

4,670       

5,630

748       

6/30/97

Dallas-Centennial

TX

 

965

3,864       

894          

943

4,780       

5,723

730       

6/30/97

Dallas-Samuell

TX

(1)

570

2,285       

416          

570

2,701       

3,271

447       

6/30/97

Dallas-Hargrove

TX

 

370

1,486       

260          

370

1,746       

2,116

337       

6/30/97

Houston-Antione

TX

 

515

2,074       

295          

515

2,369       

2,884

399       

6/30/97

Atlanta-Alpharetta

GA

 

1,033

3,753       

158          

1,033

3,911       

4,944

613       

7/24/97

Atlanta-Marietta

GA

(1)

769

2,788       

79          

771

2,865       

3,636

408       

7/24/97

Atlanta-Doraville

GA

 

735

3,429       

85          

735

3,514       

4,249

496       

8/21/97

Greensboro-Hilltop

NC

 

268

1,097       

138          

268

1,235       

1,503

172       

9/25/97

GreensboroStgCch

NC

 

89

376       

921          

89

1,297       

1,386

115       

9/25/97

Baton Rouge-Airline

LA

(1)

396

1,831       

271          

396

2,102       

2,498

308       

10/9/97

Baton Rouge-Airline2

LA

 

282

1,303       

125          

282

1,428       

1,710

232       

11/21/97

Harrisburg-Peiffers

PA

 

635

2,550       

114          

637

2,662       

3,299

343       

12/3/97

Chesapeake-Military

VA

 

542

2,210       

155          

542

2,365       

2,907

306       

2/5/98

Chesapeake-Volvo

VA

 

620

2,532       

554          

620

3,086       

3,706

354       

2/5/98

- 63 -

<PAGE>

                   

Virginia Beach Shell

VA

 

540

2,211       

131          

540

2,342       

2,882

307       

2/5/98

Virginia Beach Central

VA

 

864

3,994       

487          

864

4,481       

5,345

553       

2/5/98

Norfolk-Naval Base

VA

 

1,243

5,019       

203          

1,243

5,222       

6,465

654       

2/5/98

Tampa-E. Hillsborough

FL

 

709

3,235       

582          

709

3,817       

4,526

580       

2/4/98

Harriman

NY

 

843

3,394       

238          

843

3,632       

4,475

451       

2/4/98

Greenboro-High Point

NC

 

397

1,834       

345          

397

2,179       

2,576

271       

2/10/98

Lynchburg-Timberlake

VA

 

488

1,746       

256          

488

2,002       

2,490

235       

2/18/98

Salem

MA

 

733

2,941       

607          

733

3,548       

4,281

437       

3/3/98

Chattanooga-Lee Hwy.

TN

 

384

1,371       

219          

384

1,590       

1,974

234       

3/27/98

Chattanooga-Hwy. 58

TN

 

296

1,198       

514          

296

1,712       

2,008

193       

3/27/98

Ft. Oglethorpe

GA

 

349

1,250       

154          

349

1,404       

1,753

172       

3/27/98

Birmingham-Walt

AL

 

544

1,942       

420          

544

2,362       

2,906

356       

3/27/98

East Greenwich

RI

 

702

2,821       

495          

702

3,316       

4,018

369       

3/26/98

Durham-Hillborough

NC

 

775

3,103       

423          

775

3,526       

4,301

408       

4/9/98

Durham-Cornwallis

NC

 

940

3,763       

339          

940

4,102       

5,042

476       

4/9/98

Hendersonville

TN

 

1,050

4,203       

167          

1,050

4,370       

5,420

514       

4/9/98

Salem-Policy

NH

 

742

2,977       

58          

742

3,035       

3,777

360       

4/7/98

Warrem-Elm

OH

(1)

522

1,864       

142          

522

2,006       

2,528

269       

4/22/98

Warren-Youngstown

OH

 

512

1,829       

105          

512

1,934       

2,446

223       

4/22/98

Waterford-Highland

MI

 

1,487

5,306       

586          

1,487

5,892       

7,379

685       

4/28/98

Indian Harbor

FL

 

662

2,654       

177          

662

2,831       

3,493

334       

6/2/98

Jackson 3 - I55

MS

 

744

3,021       

56          

744

3,077       

3,821

378       

5/13/98

Katy-N. Fry

TX

 

419

1,524       

60          

419

1,584       

2,003

194       

5/20/98

Hollywood-Sheridan

FL

 

1,208

4,854       

150          

1,208

5,004       

6,212

589       

7/1/98

Pompano Beach - Atlantic

FL

 

944

3,803       

158          

944

3,961       

4,905

462       

7/1/98

Pompano Beach - Sample

FL

 

903

3,643       

290          

903

3,933       

4,836

450       

7/1/98

Boca Raton-18th St.

FL

 

1,503

6,059       

434          

1,503

6,493       

7,996

735       

7/1/98

Vero Beach

FL

 

489

1,813       

38          

489

1,851       

2,340

237       

6/12/98

Humble

TX

 

447

1,790       

516          

447

2,306       

2,753

243       

6/16/98

Houston-Old Katy

TX

(1)

659

2,680       

46          

659

2,726       

3,385

314       

6/19/98

Webster

TX

 

635

2,302       

35          

635

2,337       

2,972

278       

6/19/98

Carrollton

TX

 

548

1,988       

44          

548

2,032       

2,580

245       

6/19/98

Hollywood-N. 21st.

FL

 

840

3,373       

218          

840

3,591       

4,431

408       

8/3/98

San Marcos

TX

 

324

1,493       

302          

324

1,795       

2,119

201       

6/30/98

Austin-McNeil

TX

 

492

1,995       

115          

510

2,092       

2,602

247       

6/30/98

Austin-FM

TX

 

484

1,951       

105          

481

2,059       

2,540

244       

6/30/98

Jacksonville-Center

NC

 

327

1,329       

61          

327

1,390       

1,717

162       

8/6/98

Jacksonville-Gum Branch

NC

 

508

1,815       

153          

508

1,968       

2,476

224       

8/17/98

Jacksonville-N. Marine

NC

 

216

782       

314          

216

1,096       

1,312

160       

9/24/98

Euless

TX

 

550

1,998       

109          

550

2,107       

2,657

233       

9/29/98

N. Richland Hills

TX

 

670

2,407       

33          

670

2,440       

3,110

268       

10/9/98

Batavia

OH

 

390

1,570       

136          

390

1,706       

2,096

194       

11/19/98

- 64 -

<PAGE>

                   

Jackson-N. West

MS

 

460

1,642       

306          

460

1,948       

2,408

283       

12/1/98

Katy-Franz

TX

 

507

2,058       

78          

507

2,136       

2,643

224       

12/15/98

W. Warwick

RI

 

447

1,776       

639          

447

2,415       

2,862

217       

2/2/99

Lafayette-Pinhook 1

LA

 

556

1,951       

736          

556

2,687       

3,243

346       

2/17/99

Lafayette-Pinhook 2

LA

 

708

2,860       

129          

708

2,989       

3,697

299       

2/17/99

Lafayette-Ambassador

LA

 

314

1,095       

440          

314

1,535       

1,849

219       

2/17/99

Lafayette-Evangeline

LA

 

188

652       

564          

188

1,216       

1,404

166       

2/17/99

Lafayette-Guilbeau

LA

 

963

3,896       

106          

963

4,002       

4,965

399       

2/17/99

Gilbert-Elliott Rd.

AZ

 

651

2,600       

601          

772

3,080       

3,852

258       

5/18/99

Glendale-59th Ave.

AZ

 

565

2,596       

114          

565

2,710       

3,275

253       

5/18/99

Mesa-Baseline

AZ

 

330

1,309       

79          

330

1,388       

1,718

131       

5/18/99

Mesa-E. Broadway

AZ

 

339

1,346       

117          

339

1,463       

1,802

136       

5/18/99

Mesa-W. Broadway

AZ

 

291

1,026       

106          

291

1,132       

1,423

107       

5/18/99

Mesa-Greenfield

AZ

 

354

1,405       

103          

354

1,508       

1,862

140       

5/18/99

Phoenix-Camelback

AZ

 

453

1,610       

140          

453

1,750       

2,203

163       

5/18/99

Phoenix-Bell

AZ

 

872

3,476       

262          

872

3,738       

4,610

385       

5/18/99

Phoenix-35th Ave.

AZ

 

849

3,401       

163          

849

3,564       

4,413

326       

5/21/99

Westbrook

ME

 

410

1,626       

315          

410

1,941       

2,351

172       

8/2/99

Cocoa

FL

 

667

2,373       

433          

667

2,806       

3,473

245       

9/29/99

Cedar Hill

TX

 

335

1,521       

123          

335

1,644       

1,979

148       

11/9/99

Monroe

NY

 

276

1,312       

31          

276

1,343       

1,619

105       

2/2/00

N. Andover

MA

 

633

2,573       

72          

633

2,645       

3,278

195       

2/15/00

Seabrook

TX

 

633

2,617       

82          

633

2,699       

3,332

206       

3/1/00

Plantation

FL

 

384

1,422       

78          

384

1,500       

1,884

108       

5/2/00

Birmingham-Bessemer

AL

 

254

1,059       

74          

254

1,133       

1,387

65       

11/15/00

Dracut

MA

(1)

1,035

3,737       

25          

1,035

3,762       

4,797

105       

12/1/01

Methuen

MA

(1)

1,024

3,649       

38          

1,024

3,687       

4,711

101       

12/1/01

Columbia

SC

(1)

883

3,139       

99          

883

3,238       

4,121

91       

12/1/01

Myrtle Beach

SC

(1)

552

1,970       

126          

552

2,096       

2,648

59       

12/1/01

Kingsland

GA

(1)

470

1,902       

335          

470

2,237       

2,707

64       

12/1/01

Saco

ME

(1)

534

1,914       

13          

534

1,927       

2,461

54       

12/3/01

Plymouth

MA

 

1,004

4,584       

39          

1,004

4,623       

5,627

117       

12/19/01

Sandwich

MA

(1)

670

3,060       

66          

670

3,126       

3,796

80       

12/19/01

Syracuse

NY

(1)

294

1,203       

166          

294

1,369       

1,663

32       

2/5/02

Houston-Westward

TX

(1)

853

3,434       

227          

855

3,659       

4,514

82       

2/13/02

Houston-Boone

TX

(1)

250

1,020       

22          

251

1,041       

1,292

26       

2/13/02

Houston-Cook

TX

(1)

285

1,160       

41          

286

1,200       

1,486

30       

2/13/02

Houston-Harwin

TX

(1)

449

1,816       

32          

451

1,846       

2,297

44       

2/13/02

Houston-Hempstead

TX

(1)

545

2,200       

38          

546

2,237       

2,783

53       

2/13/02

Houston-Kuykendahl

TX

(1)

517

2,090       

35          

519

2,123       

2,642

51       

2/13/02

Houston-Hwy 249

TX

(1)

299

1,216       

233          

301

1,447       

1,748

31       

2/13/02

Mesquite-Hwy 80

TX

(1)

463

1,873       

22          

465

1,893       

2,358

45       

2/13/02

- 65 -

<PAGE>

                   

Mesquite-Franklin

TX

(1)

734

2,956       

36          

736

2,990       

3,726

70       

2/13/02

Dallas-Plantation

TX

(1)

394

1,595       

41          

395

1,635       

2,030

40       

2/13/02

San Antonio-Hunt

TX

(1)

381

1,545       

32          

383

1,575       

1,958

38       

2/13/02

Humble-5250 FM

TX

 

919

3,696       

8          

919

3,704       

4,623

47       

6/19/02

Pasadena

TX

 

612

2,468       

9          

612

2,477       

3,089

32       

6/19/02

League City

TX

 

689

3,159       

3          

689

3,162       

3,851

40       

6/19/02

Montgomery

TX

 

817

3,286       

14          

817

3,300       

4,117

42       

6/19/02

Texas City

TX

 

817

3,286       

10          

817

3,296       

4,113

42       

6/19/02

Houston-Hwy 6

TX

 

407

1,650       

10          

407

1,660       

2,067

21       

6/19/02

Lumberton

TX

 

817

3,287       

38          

817

3,325       

4,142

42       

6/19/02

The Hamptons

NY

 

2,207

8,866       

1          

2,207

8,867       

11,074

0       

12/16/02

The Hamptons

NY

 

1,131

4,564       

1          

1,131

4,565       

5,696

0       

12/16/02

The Hamptons

NY

 

635

2,918       

1          

635

2,919       

3,554

0       

12/16/02

The Hamptons

NY

 

1,251

5,744       

3          

1,252

5,746       

6,998

0       

12/16/02

Corporate Office

NY

 

           0

            68       

       4,459          

              0

       4,527       

       4,527

       887       

1/1/95

     

$132,314

$497,912       

$  80,615          

$132,853

$577,988       

$710,841

$  75,344       

 

(1) These properties are encumbered through one mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of $47.5 million at December 31, 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 66 -

<PAGE>

 

December 31, 2002

December 31, 2001

December 31, 2000

Cost:

           

Balance at beginning of period

 

$ 611,289 

 

$562,721 

 

$ 556,473 

  Additions during period:
    Acquisitions through foreclosure
       Other acquisitions
       Improvements, etc.


$    -       
81,819 
17,934 

 


$     -       
30,269 
18,527 

 


$       -    
11,239 
12,228 

 
   

99,753 

 

48,796 

 

23,467 

Deductions during period:
  Cost of real estate sold


     (201)


       (201)


      (228)


     (228)


(17,219)


 (17,219)

             

Balance at close of period

 

$710,841 

 

$611,289 

 

$562,721 

             

Accumulated Depreciation:

           

Balance at beginning of period

 

$  59,091 

 

$  45,253 

 

$   33,453 

  Additions during period:
    Depreciation expense


$ 16,344


16,344 


$  13,918 


13,918 


$  13,352 


13,352 

             

Deductions during period:

           

  Accumulated depreciation of real
  estate sold


       (91)


       (91)


         (80)


      (80)


     (1,552)


   (1,552)

Balance at close of period

 

$ 75,344 

 

$59,091 

 

$ 45,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 67 -

<PAGE>

Exhibits

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.

Description

   

3.1

Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the General Form for Registration of Securities of the Operating Partnership on Form 10.)

   

3.2*

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company

   

3.3**

By-laws of the Company

   

3.4

Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the Company's Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8A filed December 3, 1996)

   

3.5

Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 to the Company's Form 8-A filed July 29, 1999)

3.6**

Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

   

10.1

Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement among the Company, the Operating Partnership, Fleet National Bank and other lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.)

   

10.2*

Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Charles E. Lannon

   

10.3*

Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Robert J. Attea

   

10.4*

Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and Kenneth F. Myszka

   

10.5*

Form of Non-competition Agreement between the Company and David L. Rogers

   

10.6

Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Award and Option Plan, as Amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)

- 68 -

<PAGE>

 

10.7

Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Outside Directors' Option Plan, as Amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)

   

10.8*

Sovran Self Storage Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officer

   

10.9*

Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and David L. Rogers

   

10.10*

Form of Supplemental Representations, Warranties and Indemnification Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers

   

10.11*

Form of Pledge Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers

   

10.12*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain Officers and Directors of the Company

   

10.13*

Form of Subscription Agreement (including Registration Rights Statement) among the Company and subscribers for 422,171 Common Shares

   

10.14*

Form of Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreement among the Company and Robert J. Attea, Charles E. Lannon, Kenneth F. Myszka and David L. Rogers

   

10.15*

Form of Facilities Services Agreement between the Company and Williamsville Properties, Inc.

   

10.16

Sovran Self Storage, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Proxy Statement for the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders)

   

10.17

First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement among the Company, the Operating Partnership, Fleet National Bank and other lenders named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.)

10.18**

Securities Purchase Agreement among Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and other institutional investors

10.19**

Amendments to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership

10.20**

Registration Rights Agreement

- 69 -

<PAGE>

 

10.21

Promissory Note between Locke Sovran II, LLC and PNC Bank, National Association. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.)

   

12.1

Statement Re: Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges

   

23

Consent of Independent Auditors

_________________

     *     Incorporated by reference to the exhibits as filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-91422) filed June 19, 1995.

     * *  Incorporated by reference to the exhibits as filed in the Company's current report on Form 8-K, filed July 12, 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 70 -

<PAGE>

SIGNATURE

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sovran Holdings Inc., as general partner of registrant, certifies that it has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 







March 27, 2003

SOVRAN ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

By:  Sovran Holdings, Inc.
Its:  General Partner


By:   /s/ David L. Rogers                       
           David L. Rogers,
           Chief Financial Officer

   

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Sovran Holdings Inc., as general partner of registrant, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

     

Signature

Title

Date

     


  /s/ Robert J. Attea        
   Robert J. Attea

Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)



March 27, 2003

     

  /s/ Kenneth F. Myszka    
   Kenneth F. Myszka

President, Chief Operating
Officer and Director


March 27, 2003

     

  /s/ David L. Rogers       
   David L. Rogers

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


March 27, 2003

     

  /s/ Michael A. Elia        
   Michael A. Elia


Director


March 27, 2003

     

  /s/ Anthony P. Gammie   
   Anthony P. Gammie


Director


March 27, 2003

     

  /s/ Charles E. Lannon    
   Charles E. Lannon


Director


March 27, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

- 71 -

<PAGE>

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. Attea, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sovran Acquisition LP;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

c)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:          March 27, 2003

 

   / S / Robert J. Attea                         
Robert J. Attea
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc.,
the Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership

- 72 -

<PAGE>

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Rogers, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sovran Acquisition LP;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

c)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:          March 27, 2003

 

   / S / David L. Rogers                       
David L. Rogers
Chief Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings, Inc., the Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership

- 73 -

<PAGE>

Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership

Exhibit (12.1) Statement

Re: Computation of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

Amounts in thousands

 

                                Year ended December 31,                                 

 

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Earnings:

         

  Net income available to common unitholders

$22,388

$22,776

$24,564

$26,108

$24,798

  Fixed charges

  20,805

  17,955

  21,279

  15,944

   9,925

Earnings (1)

43,193

40,731

45,843

42,052

34,723

           

Fixed charges:

         

  Interest expense

14,664

13,940

17,497

13,927

9,601

  Preferred stock dividends

5,093

2,955

2,955

1,239

-    

  Amortization of financing fees

  1,048

  1,060

    827

    778

     324

Fixed charges (2)

$20,805

$17,955

$21,279

$15,944

$ 9,925

           

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
  (1)/(2)



2.08



2.27



2.15



2.64



3.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 74 -

<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-51169) of Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 28, 2003, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

 

Buffalo, New York
March 27, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 75 -

<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

               In connection with the Annual Report of Sovran Acquisition LP (the "Operating Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.

Dated:          March 27, 2003

 

   / S / Robert J. Attea                         
Robert J. Attea
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer of Sovran Holdings,
Inc., the Sole General Partner of the
Operating Partnership




   / S / David L. Rogers                       
David L. Rogers
Chief Financial Officer of Sovran Holdings,
Inc., the Sole General Partner of the
Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 76 -