UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For The Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2004
or
[ ] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the Transition Period from __________ to ______________
Commission file number 1-11862
INTERPOOL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in the charter)
| Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
13-3467669 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
211 College Road East, Princeton, New
Jersey 08540
(Address of principal executive
office)
(Zip
Code)
(609) 452-8900
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check |X| whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes /x/ No / /
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes /x/ No / /
As of December 1 2004, there were 27,384,421 shares of common stock, $.001 par value outstanding.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
| Page No. |
| Part I - Financial Information--Interpool, Inc. and Subsidiaries | 1 |
| Item 1: Financial Statements | 1 |
| Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets--September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 | 3 |
| Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (Restated) |
4 |
| Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (Restated) |
5 |
| Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity at December 31, 2003 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
6 |
| Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7 |
| Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 29 |
| Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 50 |
| Item 4: Controls and Procedures | 52 |
| Part II - Other Information | 57 |
| Item 1: Legal Proceedings | 57 |
| Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 57 |
| Signatures | 60 |
| Exhibits | 61 |
| Certifications | 63 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and December 31, 2003 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and 2003 (unaudited) (the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) of Interpool, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company or the Registrant) included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Registrant believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2003 Form 10-K). These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
As discussed in the Companys 2003 Form 10-K, the Company restated its financial statements for the first three quarters of 2003. The Company concluded that this restatement was necessary while preparing for its 2003 annual audit in July 2004. For further information regarding this restatement, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All financial information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to the restatement.
During the preparation of the third quarter of 2004 financial statements, the Company uncovered an immaterial error related to financial statements not part of any current filing, which has been reported as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. For further information regarding this adjustment, see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to the adjustment.
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, the Company is required in 2004 to classify its outstanding Preferred Capital Securities issued in 1997 within the debt section on the face of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Previously, these instruments were classified separately with the caption Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities in Subsidiary Grantor Trusts. There was no modification of the terms of the Preferred Capital Securities and no impact on net income upon adoption.
The information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the securities laws. These forward-looking statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future events and financial performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Companys control. All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this report, regarding the Companys strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the words will, believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, expect, project and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
December 31,
September 30, 2003
2004 As Adjusted
------------- -------------
ASSETS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS $263,759 $141,019
MARKETABLE SECURITIES, available for sale at fair value 24 24
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, less allowance of $13,978 and $16,358, respectively 71,447 69,055
NET INVESTMENT IN DIRECT FINANCING LEASES 366,095 426,815
OTHER RECEIVABLES, net 3,968 25,485
LEASING EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
of $535,321 and $521,874, respectively 1,596,279 1,636,716
OTHER ASSETS 67,968 73,922
--------- ---------
TOTAL ASSETS $2,369,540 $2,373,036
========= =========
LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES $148,005 $198,062
INCOME TAXES 50,463 37,759
DEFERRED INCOME 2,548 2,704
DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Due within one year 432,168 219,192
Due after one year 1,268,320 1,496,495
--------- ---------
TOTAL DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS 1,700,488 1,715,687
TOTAL LIABILITIES $1,901,504 $1,954,212
--------- ---------
MINORITY INTEREST IN EQUITY OF SUBSIDIARIES 37,837 35,184
--------- ---------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 1,000,000 authorized, none issued --- ---
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
27,604,746 issued at September 30, 2004 and 27,602,452 issued at December 31, 2003 28 28
Additional paid-in capital 127,892 128,538
Unamortized deferred compensation-stock grants (575) (1,184)
Treasury stock, at cost, 225,900 shares at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (2,229) (2,229)
Retained earnings 313,812 272,815
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (8,729) (14,328)
--------- ---------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 430,199 383,640
--------- ---------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $2,369,540 $2,373,036
========= =========
The accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these balance sheets.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
------------- -------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- ----
(Restated) (Restated)
---------- --------------
REVENUES, including income recognized on direct financing leases $98,755 $95,815 $290,383 $277,179
of $9,935, $11,404, $31,298 and $34,037, respectively ------- ------- -------- ---------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Lease operating and administrative expenses 32,143 39,013 92,082 92,139
Provision for doubtful accounts 183 708 1,287 2,846
Fair value adjustment for derivative instruments (270) (103) (1,305) (484)
Depreciation and amortization of leasing equipment 22,423 22,414 67,974 66,894
Impairment of leasing equipment 747 1,157 4,160 6,520
(Income)/losses for investments accounted for under the equity
method (186) 891 (570) 1,501
Gain on settled insurance litigation --- --- (6,267) ---
Other income, net (5,303) (65) (9,964) (2,168)
Interest expense 26,983 26,989 81,654 78,427
Interest income (676) (976) (1,865) (3,226)
----- ----- ------- -------
76,044 90,028 227,186 242,449
------- ------- -------- --------
Income before minority interest expense and provision for income
taxes 22,711 5,787 63,197 34,730
MINORITY INTEREST EXPENSE, NET (2,678) (452) (5,481) (1,374)
------- ----- ------- -------
Income before provision for income taxes 20,033 5,335 57,716 33,356
PROVISION/(BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES 4,216 (1,211) 11,151 2,705
------ ------- ------ ------
NET INCOME $15,817 $6,546 $46,565 $30,651
======== ======= ======= ========
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
Basic $0.58 $0.24 $1.70 $1.12
===== ===== ===== =====
Diluted $0.53 $0.23 $1.57 $1.06
===== ===== ===== =====
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (in thousands):
Basic 27,379 27,376 27,378 27,361
====== ====== ====== ======
Diluted 30,828 29,129 30,567 30,390
====== ====== ====== ======
The accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2004 2003
------ --------
(Restated)
-----------
CASH FLOWS
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $46,565 $30,651
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities --
Depreciation and amortization 71,408 67,423
Impairment of leasing equipment 4,160 6,520
Restricted stock grant expense 64 181
Gain on settled insurance litigation (6,267) ---
(Gain)/loss on sale of leasing equipment (415) 1,420
Gain on sale of leasing equipment for resale (9,093) (2,183)
Loss on sale of marketable securities --- 26
Provision for doubtful accounts 1,287 2,846
Fair value adjustment for derivative instruments (1,305) (484)
(Income)/loss on investment accounted for under the equity method (570) 1,501
Other, net 19,985 (13,083)
------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 125,819 94,818
------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of leasing equipment (68,170) (104,592)
Proceeds from dispositions of leasing equipment 22,512 12,068
Purchase of leasing equipment for resale (71,277) (21,047)
Proceeds from disposal of leasing equipment for resale 78,921 23,230
Investment in direct financing leases, net of income earned (37,392) (76,060)
Cash collections on direct financing leases 68,768 54,463
Purchase of marketable securities --- (10)
Proceeds from minority interest in subsidiary --- 500
Sales and matured marketable securities and other investing activities --- 1,468
--- ------
Net cash used for investing activities (6,638) (109,980)
------- ---------
CASH FLOWS
FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of debt 266,025 149,460
Payment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations (214,840) (147,180)
Borrowings of revolving credit lines 21,500 78,500
Repayment of revolving credit lines (65,384) (48,500)
Dividends paid (3,742) (4,493)
------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities 3,559 27,787
----- ------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 122,740 12,625
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period 141,019 170,613
------- -------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $263,759 $183,238
======== ========
Cash paid for interest $86,313 $84,075
======= =======
Cash paid for taxes $1,000 $906
====== ====
Supplemental disclosure of
non-cash investing activities:
Direct financing leases financed through capital lease obligations $--- $4,397
===== ======
Transfers from leasing equipment to direct financing leases $9,004 $13,153
====== =======
Transfers from direct financing leases to leasing equipment $6,970 $2,898
====== ======
The accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
AT DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
(dollars and shares in thousands)
(unaudited)
Common Stock Acum.
------------------ Other Total
Additional Unamortized Comp. Share-
Outstanding Par Paid-in Deferred Treasury Retained Income Comprehensive holder's
Shares Value Capital Compensation Stock Earnings (Loss) Income Equity
---------- ----- --------- ------------ ------- -------- ------ ------------ -----------
BALANCE, December 31, 2003,
as previously reported 27,377 28 128,538 (1,184) (2,229) 272,012 (14,328) 382,837
Adjustment
(see Note 3) --- --- --- --- --- 803 --- 803
BALANCE, December 31, 2003,
as adjusted 27,377 28 128,538 (1,184) (2,229) 272,815 (14,328) 383,640
Net income --- --- --- --- --- 46,565 --- 46,565 46,565
Other comprehensive income --- --- --- --- --- --- 5,599 5,599 5,599
------
Comprehensive income 52,164
=======
Restricted stock award 2 --- 371 (371) --- --- ---
Amortization of restricted
stock award --- --- --- 64 --- --- --- 64
Forfeitures restricted
stock award --- --- (1,017) 916 --- --- --- (101)
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock, $0.1875 per
share --- --- --- --- --- (5,568) --- (5,568)
BALANCE, September 30, 2004 27,379 $28 $127,892 $(575) $(2,229) $313,812 $(8,729) $430,199
====== === ======== ===== ======= ======== ======= ========
The accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Note 1 - Nature of Operations and Accounting Policies
A. Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Interpool, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The Company has made certain reclassifications to prior balances to conform to the current year presentation. It is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2003 Form 10-K). These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
As discussed in the Companys 2003 Form 10-K, the Company restated its financial statements for the first three quarters of 2003. The Company concluded that this restatement was necessary while preparing for its 2003 annual audit in July 2004. For further information regarding this restatement, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All financial information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to the restatement.
During the preparation of the third quarter of 2004 financial statements, the Company uncovered an immaterial error related to financial statements not part of any current filing, which has been reported as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. For further information regarding this adjustment, see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to the adjustment.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
B. Nature of Operations
The Company and its subsidiaries conduct business principally in a single industry segment, the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, chassis and other transportation related equipment. Within this single industry segment, the Company has two reportable segments: container leasing and domestic intermodal equipment leasing. The container-leasing segment specializes primarily in the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, while the domestic intermodal equipment segment specializes primarily in the leasing of intermodal container chassis. The Company leases its containers principally to international container shipping lines located throughout the world. The customers for the Companys chassis are a large number of domestic companies, many of which are domestic subsidiaries or branches of international shipping lines, as well as major U.S. railroads and independent truckers. Equipment is purchased directly or acquired through conditional sales contracts and lease agreements, many of which qualify as capital leases.
The Companys container leasing operations are conducted through its subsidiary, Interpool Limited, a Barbados corporation. Profits of Interpool Limited from container leasing operations are exempt from federal taxation in the United States. These profits are subject to Barbados tax at rates that are substantially lower than the applicable rates in the United States. For further information regarding the United States and Barbados income tax treaty, see Note 8 - July 2004 Protocol to the United States and Barbados Tax Treaty to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company previously had operations in a third reportable segment that specialized in leasing microcomputers and related equipment. The computer-leasing segment consisted of two majority owned subsidiaries, Microtech Leasing Corporation (Microtech) and Personal Computer Rental Corporation (PCR). During the third quarter of 2001, the Company adopted a plan to exit this segment that included i) acquiring the remaining ownership interest in Microtech and terminating its operations, and ii) selling the Companys ownership interest in PCR. The Company liquidated the assets of Microtech as of March 31, 2004. PCR ceased active operations and began to liquidate in 2003. At March 31, 2004, all of the assets of PCR were liquidated.
C. Basis of Consolidation
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and subsidiaries which are more than 50% owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Minority interest in equity of subsidiaries represents the minority stockholders proportionate share of the equity in the income/(losses) of the subsidiaries.
In connection with certain investments in which the Company does not own a majority interest or otherwise control, or have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee, these investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The Companys investment in its equity method investees is included in other assets on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
D. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period (which is net of treasury shares). Diluted income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The dilutive effect of stock options and warrants and the un-vested portion of restricted stock grants is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes the repurchase of common shares at the average market price for the period. Stock options and warrants that do not have a dilutive effect (because the exercise price is above the market price) are not included in the diluted income per share. Warrants to purchase 43,658 shares were not dilutive for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and were not included in diluted earnings per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2004 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 all stock options and warrants to acquire common shares are dilutive. Unvested restricted stock grants were dilutive for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the three months ended September 30, 2003 but did not have a dilutive effect to earnings per share (EPS) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The convertible redeemable subordinated debentures issued by the Company in December 2002, January 2003 and February 2003 were dilutive for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003 but did not have a dilutive effect to EPS for the three months ended September 30, 2003.
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic EPS with that of diluted EPS is presented below:
Three Months Nine Months
Ended Ended
September 30, September 30,
------------- --------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
------ ------- ------- -------
(Restated) (Restated)
---------- ----------
Numerator
Net Income - Basic EPS $15,817 $6,546 $46,565 $30,651
Interest expense on convertible debentures,
net of tax of $344, $0, $1,032 and $988,
respectively 516 --- 1,548 1,483
------ ------- ------- -------
Net Income - Diluted EPS $16,333 $6,546 $48,113 $32,134
======= ====== ======= =======
Denominator
Weighted average common shares
outstanding-Basic 27,379 27,376 27,378 27,361
Dilutive stock options and warrants 1,954 1,744 1,697 1,578
Dilutive convertible debentures 1,487 --- 1,487 1,451
Dilutive restricted stock grants 8 9 5 ---
------ ------- ------- -------
Weighted average common shares
outstanding-Diluted 30,828 29,129 30,567 30,390
======= ====== ====== ======
Earnings per common share
Basic $0.58 $0.24 $1.70 $1.12
======= ====== ====== ======
Diluted $0.53 $0.23 $1.57 $1.06
======= ====== ====== ======
E. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income or loss for the current period and gains or losses that have been previously excluded from the income statement and were only reported as a component of equity.
The tax effect of other comprehensive income/(loss) is as follows:
Before Tax Tax Net of
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Amount Effect Tax Amount
------ ------ ----------
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) arising during the period:
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment $(33) $12 $(21)
Swap agreements 7,900 (2,280) 5,620
----- ------- ------
$7,867 $(2,268) $5,599
===== ======= ======
Before Tax Tax Net of
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 Amount Effect Tax Amount
------ ------ ----------
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period:
Marketable securities (1) $37 $(13) $24
Other investment securities 38 (13) 25
Swap agreements 6,640 (2,102) 4,538
----- ------- ------
$6,715 $(2,128) $4,587
===== ======= ======
(1) Amounts are net of losses on sales of marketable securities of $26
(before income tax effect of $1) recognized in the income statement.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, are as follows:
September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
------------------ -----------------
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment $ (18) $ 3
Swap agreements (8,711) (14,331)
-------- ---------
$(8,729) $(14,328)
======== ==========
F. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock option plans are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 148). This Statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), which allows for the retention of principles within Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). As permitted by the Statement, the Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method. To date, all options were granted with exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys Stock at Grant Date. Options issued with an exercise price below the fair value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant will be accounted for as compensatory options. For compensatory options, the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the Companys common stock will be charged to expense over the shorter of the vesting or service period. Options issued at fair value are non-compensatory.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share had the fair value method of accounting been applied to the Companys stock compensation plans.
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
------------------- -------------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
----- ----- ----- ------
(Restated) (Restated)
--------- ----------
Net income, as reported $15,817 $6,546 $46,565 $30,651
Add: Stock based employee compensation expense
included in net income, net of related tax
effects 367 343 394 435
----- ----- ----- ------
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects (375) (350) (418) (496)
----- ----- ----- ------
Pro forma net income $15,809 $6,539 $46,541 $30,590
======= ====== ======= =======
Earnings per share:
Basic-as reported $0.58 $0.24 $1.70 $1.12
===== ===== ===== =====
Basic-pro forma $0.58 $0.24 $1.70 $1.12
===== ===== ===== =====
Diluted-as reported $0.53 $0.23 $1.57 $1.06
===== ===== ===== =====
Diluted-pro forma $0.53 $0.23 $1.57 $1.06
===== ===== ===== =====
This pro forma impact takes into account all options granted under the plan. No options were granted by the Company in 2004 or 2003.
On January 2, 2004, under the Companys Deferred Bonus Plan, the Company granted to eligible employees 27,259 shares of restricted stock that had a fair value of $13.60 per share at the grant date. The number of shares of restricted stock awarded was calculated by dividing the dollar value of the stock portion of the bonus by the average stock price for the last 10 trading days ending on December 31 of the grant year. Additional restricted stock was awarded based on the vesting period selected by the employee. If the five-year vesting period was selected, the shares awarded were increased by 10%. If the ten-year vesting period was selected, the shares awarded were increased by 30%. These grants cliff vest in equal installments upon continued service over either the five or ten year period elected by the employee. At the date of grant, $371 of deferred compensation was credited to paid-in capital with an offset to unamortized deferred compensationstock grant in the equity section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Compensation cost is recognized ratably over the vesting periods during which the related employee service is rendered. During the first quarter of 2004, our Chief Executive Officer elected to voluntarily relinquish his entire 2002 bonus. This resulted in the forfeiture of 60,407 unvested shares of restricted stock valued at $1,017. This forfeiture resulted in the reversal of $916 of previously recorded unamortized deferred compensation expense, as well as the reversal of previously recorded compensation expense of $101. Excluding the reversal of previously recorded compensation expense related to this forfeiture, compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $21 and $64, respectively. Compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $60 and $181, respectively. The unamortized deferred compensation remaining in stockholders equity was $575 at September 30, 2004. In September 2004, the Board of Directors terminated the Deferred Bonus Plan. All stock previously issued under this Plan will continue to be subject to the terms of the Plan. However, future bonuses will not be subject to the terms of the Deferred Bonus Plan.
On July 1, 2004, in connection with employment agreements with certain executive officers, the company granted common stock appreciation rights (SARS) that provide for the grantees to receive cash payments measured by any appreciation in the market price of the common stock over a specified base price. The Company granted such stock appreciation rights with respect to a total of 275,000 share units at a base price of $14.05. The $14.05 base price reflected the price on the over-the-counter market on February 20, 2004, the business day before the date on which the terms of the stock appreciation rights were fixed. The grant of stock appreciation rights was subsequently ratified by the Board of Directors on March 30, 2004, by which time the closing price of the Companys common stock had increased to $15.00. At July 1, 2004, the date the employment agreements became effective, the most recent closing stock price of the Companys common stock was $16.55. Under the terms of the employment agreements, a total of 260,000 of these stock appreciation rights will vest in 2005 (or earlier upon a change in control) with the remaining 15,000 rights vesting in three equal installments on December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Upon vesting, these stock appreciation rights may be exercisable at any time prior to the expiration of the earlier of 10 days following the termination of the employee or June 30, 2014.
FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans, requires interim calculations of the amount of compensation expense inherent in the SARS (variable plan accounting). This amount is equal to the increase in the quoted market price since date of grant or award multiplied by the total number of rights outstanding. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting periods during which the related employee service is rendered. At September 30, 2004, the quoted market price of the Companys common stock was $18.70. Compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $495 and is included in lease operating and administrative expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
G. Credit Risk
At September 30, 2004, approximately 48% (47% at December 31, 2003) of accounts receivable and 71% (71% at December 31, 2003) of the net investment in direct financing leases were from customers outside of the United States.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Companys top 25 customers represented approximately 75% of its consolidated billings, with no single customer accounting for more than 7.7%. For the same period in the prior year, the Companys top 25 customers represented approximately 73% of its consolidated billings with no single customer accounting for more than 7.8%.
H. Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). This statement requires that certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity, be classified as liabilities in the statement of financial position. This pronouncement requires the Company to display its outstanding Preferred Capital Securities issued in 1997 (previously described as Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities in Subsidiary Grantor Trusts) within the debt section on the face of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and show the related expense with interest expense on a pre-tax basis. There was no modification of the terms of the Capital Securities and no impact on net income upon adoption. This pronouncement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. On November 7, 2003, the provisions of SFAS 150, relating to certain mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interest, were deferred indefinitely. The adoption of these delayed provisions is not expected to materially affect the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R) which addresses how a business should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46 which was issued in January 2003. The Company adopted FIN 46R as of December 31, 2003. There was no impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Note 2 - Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
During its 2003 year-end closing procedures, the Company identified a number of deficiencies in the internal controls over accounting and reporting for certain transactions. As a result, the Company restated the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the unaudited interim periods for the first three quarters in 2003. The Company determined that the effect of these deficiencies in internal controls on years ended prior to January 1, 2003 was not material. The restated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are included in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following tables set forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on income before taxes, net income and the basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. The restatement adjustments are discussed in the Description of Restatement Items section following the tables below.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited)
-------------------------------------------------
Net Income
Net Per Share Net Income Per
Income before taxes Income (Basic) Share (Diluted)
------------------- ------ ------- ---------------
Previously Reported $4,760 $6,117 $0.22 $0.21
Rebill equipment repairs 382 229 0.01 0.01
Chassis impairment (88) (53) --- ---
Lease accounting 231 223 0.01 0.01
Other 50 30 --- ---
----------------------- -------------- --------------- -----------------
Net restatements 575 429 0.02 0.02
----------------------- -------------- --------------- -----------------
As restated $5,335 $6,546 $0.24 $0.23
======================= ============== =============== =================
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited)
------------------------------------------------
Net Income
Net Per Share Net Income Per
Income before taxes Income (Basic) Share (Diluted)
------------------- ------ ------- ---------------
Previously Reported $29,979 $28,165 $1.03 $0.97
Rebill equipment repairs 3,068 1,841 0.07 0.07
Chassis impairment (1,100) (660) (0.02) (0.02)
Lease accounting 1,260 1,216 0.04 0.04
Other 149 89 --- ---
----------------------- -------------- --------------- -----------------
Net restatements 3,377 2,486 0.09 0.09
----------------------- -------------- --------------- -----------------
As restated $33,356 $30,651 $1.12 $1.06
======================= ============== =============== =================
Description of Restatement Items
Rebill Equipment Repairs
In certain instances, the accounting for damaged equipment at the end of an operating lease was not performed properly. The amounts due from customers for these damages are not recorded in revenue when invoiced; rather, they are used to establish a liability to cover the repair of the equipment. In many cases, these liabilities were not being reversed when payment was made for the repaired equipment. In addition, in some cases, the liability was not being reversed when the equipment was sold or remanufactured.
Chassis Impairment
The Company has a program of remanufacturing chassis when they near the end of their useful life or if the equipment is impaired in its present condition. In certain cases, the impairment of these chassis was not recognized on a timely basis.
Lease Accounting
As noted in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, the lease accounting system used to account for direct financing leases was inadequate in providing the necessary data for the amortization of the leases and the recognition of revenue. As a result, the Company continues to perform manual calculations for all financing leases until the new finance lease system is implemented. A number of these manual calculations were not initially performed correctly during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, and were subsequently corrected during the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company is in the process of implementing a new finance lease system to handle the accounting for leases.
Other
The Company made other adjustments to previously recorded estimates. These adjustments were individually not material and increased pretax income by $50 and $149 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Income Tax Expense
The change in the provision for income taxes due to the adjustments described above increased the provision for income taxes by $146 and $891 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Note 3 - Adjustment to Opening Retained Earnings
During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company sold certain assets (with a book value of approximately $1,865) of CTC Container Trading (U.K.) Limited (CTC), a wholly-owned subsidiary which leased specialized cargo carrying units and other equipment for use by companies operating in the North Sea. While quantifying the approximate impact related to this sale, the Company noted that there was an elimination entry of approximately $803, net of tax, in the Interpool Limited consolidation related to CTC. This entry reduced retained earnings with a comparable reduction to leasing equipment. The entry originated when Interpool Limited sold container equipment to CTC at a profit prior to 1994. The elimination entry was recorded to eliminate the inter-company profits generated from the sale of the equipment. The inter-company profit included in the elimination entry should have been amortized over the period the equipment was being depreciated by CTC using the higher book values. No such amortization ever took place. The depreciation would have ended prior to any period being reported on by the Company in this Form 10-Q or in the December 31, 2004 Form 10-K. The effect of this error was to understate earnings during the period that the equipment was being depreciated. The Company determined the impact of this error should be reported as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.
Income Tax Expense
The change in the provision for income taxes due to the correction of the errors described above increased the provision for income taxes by $146 and $891 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Note 4 - Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys debt and capital lease obligations as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
------------------ -----------------
Capital lease obligations payable in varying amounts through
2018 $269,014 $325,258
Chassis Securitization Facility, interest at 5.47% and 5.59% at
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively
Warehouse facility 22,490 25,490
Debt obligation 61,417 86,413
Capital lease obligation 400,117 404,674
Revolving credit facility, interest rate at 3.66% and 3.09% at
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively 158,611 193,495
Revolving credit facility CAI, interest rate at 3.36% and
3.37% at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, 78,000 87,000
respectively
Container securitization facility, interest at 6.71% and 6.50% at
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively 36,796 76,564
6.0% Notes due 2014 (unsecured) net of unamortized
discount of $22,435 at September 30, 2004 127,565 ---
7.35% Notes due 2007 (unsecured) 115,395 147,000
7.20% Notes due 2007 (unsecured) 45,335 62,825
9.25% Convertible redeemable subordinated debentures,
mandatory redemption 2022 (unsecured) 37,182 37,182
9.875% Preferred capital securities due 2027 (unsecured) 75,000 75,000
Notes and loans payable with various rates ranging from
3.60% to 9.77% and maturities from 2004 to 2010 273,566 194,786
------- -------
Total Debt and Capital Lease Obligations 1,700,488 1,715,687
--------- ---------
Less Current Maturities 432,168 219,192
Total Non-Current Debt and Capital Lease Obligations $1,268,320 $1,496,495
========== ==========
Debt Modifications: In January and February 2004, in connection with obtaining necessary amendments under the revolving credit facility due to the late filing of the Companys periodic reports with the SEC and the restatement of its past financial statements, the Company agreed, among other things, to reduce advance rates under this revolving facility, to add several events of default, to increase the interest rate margin, and to maintain specified levels of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents until delinquent SEC filings are made. Subsequent to January 9, 2004 (the date the Company filed its 2002 Form 10-K), the Company was obligated to maintain unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of at least $60,000 at all times and at least $67,500 as of the last business day of the month until completion and filing of all delayed financial statements for 2003 and 2004. This minimum cash requirement was also adopted in the waivers of the container securitization and one other loan agreement. In conjunction with the waiver received during February 2004, the Company replaced its annual amortization payment with monthly amortization payments under its revolving credit facility beginning in March 2004. The related minimum cash requirement was subsequently reduced dollar-for-dollar with the amortization payments. At September 30, 2004 the minimum cash requirement was $41,872. The revolving credit facility was repaid in full on November 1, 2004 and replaced by a facility with another lender. See Note 9 Subsequent Events Financing Activities. The requirement to maintain certain levels of unrestricted cash was eliminated for all facilities when the revolving credit facility and one other facility were repaid in full during November 2004.
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, the Company is required in 2004 to classify its outstanding Preferred Capital Securities issued in 1997 within the debt section on the face of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Previously, these instruments were classified separately with the caption Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities in Subsidiary Grantor Trusts. There was no modification of the terms of the Preferred Capital Securities and no impact on net income upon adoption. In connection with this change, the Company has negotiated amendments to its debt agreements that allow these securities to be treated as they have been in the past for purposes of calculating compliance with loan covenants. At the date of this report, the Company has received all necessary amendments to be in full compliance with its loan covenants.
As required by waivers previously received from its lenders, the Company completed its 2004 periodic Form 10-Q filings with the SEC before December 31, 2004. The Company has also received permanent waivers from certain of its financial institutions with respect to key-man and certain other provisions.
New Financings: During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company entered into new financing arrangements totaling $291,025 of which $266,025 was utilized. The new debt utilized during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 consisted of notes and loans with installments payable in varying amounts through 2014 and various interest rates ranging from 4.3% to 7.5%. One commitment for $25,000 was not utilized at September 30, 2004. This commitment will be open until March 31, 2005, after which any unfunded amount will expire. Amounts funded under this facility will be amortized over sixty months commencing on the date the actual funding occurs, to a final balloon payment of 20%. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 250 basis points.
The following financings which are included in the above summary, were completed during the third quarter of 2004;
The Company successfully completed a secured financing of $15,000 during July of 2004 with installments payable through 2005 at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.5%. A portion of the proceeds was used to satisfy a note payable from PCR to an unrelated financial institution, which was guaranteed by the Company for PCR. The remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
During August 2004, the Company entered into a lease arrangement with a Japanese lessor involving $21,093 of equipment previously financed with a financial institution during December 2003 and May 2004. The lease advance rate against this equipment was 107% ($22,510 total advance), increasing the cash proceeds received by the Company by $5,807 from the level of the previous financings. The lease expires in December 2008, and the Company has a fixed purchase option at that time for $14,631 that it expects to exercise. The aggregate fixed interest rate is 7.44%.
Additionally, on September 14, 2004, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which it sold $150,000 total principal amount of a new series of 6% notes due 2014 (the Notes) in a private transaction with four investors. In connection with the sale of the Notes, the Company also issued to the investors two series of Warrants exercisable for a total of 8,333,333 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $18.00 per share (the Warrants). The Warrants were valued at $22,500 and recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, with the offset recorded as a discount on the Notes. This discount will be amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the ten-year life of the Notes. The overall interest rate on the Notes, considering the amortization of the discount, is approximately 8.3%. The value of the Warrants will be determined during each accounting period, and adjusted if required. During the period in which the warrants are classified as a liability, any changes in fair value will be reported in the Statement of Income. The first series of Warrants is exercisable at any time for a total of 5,475,768 shares. The second series will become exercisable at any time for a total of 2,857,565 shares, following stockholder approval of such exercise at a special meeting of the Companys stockholders. The Company also entered into agreements with the investors to file registration statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the benefit of the investors, with respect to the Notes and the Warrants. The terms of the Warrants provide that the exercise price will be paid by the investors to the Company solely in cash except that after the Company has filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the Warrants and underlying common stock, in the event such registration statement has not become effective or is otherwise not available to the Warrant holders if the exercise of the Warrants for cash would not be permitted under the federal securities laws, the exercise price may be paid by tendering a principal amount of 6% Notes equal to the exercise price of the Warrants then being exercised. The sale of the Notes and Warrants pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement was made in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act) pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act.
Of the $150,000 in proceeds from the September 14, 2004 sale of the Notes and Warrants, the Company repurchased, at face value, a portion of its outstanding 7.35% notes due 2007 ($31,605) and 7.20% notes due 2007 ($17,490) which were held by the investors. The remaining proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, the purchase of equipment, retirement of debt, potential acquisitions and/or working capital.
The Notes mature on September 1, 2014, with interest payable semi-annually at a rate of 6% per annum. The Company has the right to redeem the Notes at any time after September 1, 2009 with a declining premium. The maturity of the Notes can be accelerated upon the occurrence of an Event of Default as such term is defined in the indenture governing the Notes (the Indenture). The Indenture also contains various restrictive covenants, including limitations on the payment of dividends and other restricted payments, limitations on incurrence of indebtedness, and limitations on asset sales, the violation of which by the Company would result in an Event of Default.
The Warrants expire on September 1, 2014, although the Company has the right under certain conditions to require that they be exercised at any time after its common stock trades at $30.00 per share or more for five consecutive trading days.
The Company intends to hold a special meeting of the Stockholders in the first quarter of 2005 and at that meeting will seek stockholder approval for the exercise of the second series of Warrants. In connection with the sale of the Notes and Warrants, certain of the Companys significant stockholders, whose combined interest in the Company represents more than 50% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Companys Common Stock entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which they have agreed to vote to approve the exercise of the second series of Warrants by the investors. In addition, Martin Tuchman, the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Warren Serenbetz, a member of the Companys Board of Directors, and an entity controlled by members of the Serenbetzs family agreed to certain restrictions on their ability to transfer shares of the Companys common stock in private transactions.
Copies of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Indenture, the Warrant Agreement, the Notes Registration Rights Agreement and the Investor Rights Agreement were filed as exhibits to the Companys report on Form 8-K issued September 15, 2004.
For information about the Companys sale of additional 6% notes due 2014 during November 2004 see Note 9, Subsequent Events Financing Activities, to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Covenants: Under the Companys revolving credit facility (paid in full November 1, 2004) and most of its other debt instruments in effect at September 30, 2004, the Company was required to maintain covenants (as defined) for tangible net worth (the most stringent of which required the Company to maintain tangible net worth of at least $250,000), a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1 and a funded debt to net worth ratio (as defined in the agreement, which is stockholders equity plus preferred capital securities, less goodwill) of 4.0 to 1. A financing facility entered into in March 2004, and subsequently amended and expanded on November 1, 2004, includes a requirement that the Company maintain a tangible net worth (as defined in the agreement) of at least $300,000. This facility also has a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1 and a funded debt to tangible net worth ratio of 4.0 to 1. A servicing agreement to which the Company is a party requires that the Company maintain a tangible net worth (as defined in the agreement) of at least $375,000 plus 50% of any positive net income reported from October 1, 2004 forward. At September 30, 2004 the Company was in compliance with these covenants as amended.
Deferral of Dividend Payment to Board Members: In connection with the Companys delayed SEC filings and the receipt of waivers from its lenders necessitated by the delayed filings beginning in January 2004, the members of the Companys Board of Directors and certain of its affiliates who own shares of the Companys common stock have agreed to defer their receipt of any dividend payments, including those the Company may declare in the future, until the Company is in compliance with all SEC filing requirements. As of September 30, 2004 recorded dividend payments in the amount of $3,488 have been deferred and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Upon the filing of this Form 10-Q report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company will have filed all required reports with the SEC. As a result, it is anticipated that all deferred dividend payments will be distributed to the members of the Board of Directors and their affiliates before December 31, 2004.
Note 5 - Segment and Geographic Data
The Company and its subsidiaries conduct business principally in a single industry segment, the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, chassis and other transportation related equipment. Within this single industry segment, the majority of the Companys operations come from two reportable segments: container leasing and domestic intermodal equipment leasing. The container-leasing segment specializes primarily in the leasing of dry freight standard containers, while the domestic intermodal equipment segment specializes primarily in the leasing of intermodal container chassis.
The Company previously had operations in a third reportable segment that specialized in leasing microcomputers and related equipment. The computer leasing segment consisted of two subsidiaries, Microtech and PCR. During the third quarter of 2001, the Company adopted a plan to exit this segment. The Company liquidated the assets of Microtech as of March 31, 2004. PCR ceased active operations and began to liquidate in the first quarter of 2003. At March 31, 2004, all of the assets of PCR were liquidated.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss before income taxes. The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services.
Segment Information
-------------------
Domestic Computer
Container Intermodal Leasing
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004: Leasing Equipment Equipment Totals
------------------------------------- ------- --------- --------- ------
Revenues $136,358 $154,025 $--- $290,383
Lease operating, administrative and other expenses 30,259 61,805 --- 92,064
Depreciation and amortization 43,724 24,250 --- 67,974
Impairment of leasing equipment 1,358 2,802 --- 4,160
Gain on settled insurance litigation (3,781) (2,486) --- (6,267)
Other (income)/expense, net and minority interest (5,509) 1,026 --- (4,483)
Income for investments under equity method --- (570) --- (570)
Interest income (1,135) (727) (3) (1,865)
Interest expense 26,558 55,096 --- 81,654
Income before taxes 44,884 12,829 3 57,716
Net investment in DFL's 281,803 84,292 --- 366,095
Leasing equipment, net 713,310 882,969 --- 1,596,279
Equipment purchases 82,426 23,136 --- 105,562
Total segment assets $1,167,837 $1,201,676 $27 $2,369,540
Domestic Computer
Container Intermodal Leasing
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (Restated): Leasing Equipment Equipment Totals
------------------------------------------------ ------- --------- --------- ------
Revenues $129,235 $147,528 $416 $277,179
Lease operating, administrative and other expenses 31,378 63,363 (240) 94,501
Depreciation and amortization 43,245 23,649 --- 66,894
Impairment of leasing equipment 1,380 5,140 --- 6,520
Other (income)/expense, net and minority interest (1,872) 921 157 (794)
Loss for investments under equity method --- 1,501 --- 1,501
Interest income (2,161) (1,064) (1) (3,226)
Interest expense 23,782 54,643 2 78,427
Income before taxes 33,483 (625) 498 33,356
Net investment in DFL's 319,163 93,146 126 412,435
Leasing equipment, net 753,861 894,077 --- 1,647,938
Equipment purchases 127,776 52,876 --- 180,652
Total segment assets $1,248,435 $1,171,197 $1,862 $2,421,494
The Companys shipping line customers utilize international containers in world trade over many varied and changing trade routes. In addition, most large shipping lines have many offices in various countries involved in container operations. The Companys revenue from international containers is earned while the containers are used in service carrying cargo around the world, while certain other equipment is utilized in the United States. Accordingly, the international information presented below represents our international container leasing operation conducted through Interpool Limited, a Barbados corporation, while the United States information presented below represents our domestic intermodal equipment leasing segment, as well as those revenues and assets relative to our 50% owned consolidated subsidiary, Container Applications International, Inc. (CAI) which is headquartered in the United States of America. Such presentation is consistent with industry practice.
Geographic Information
- -----------------------
Nine Months Ended September 30,
-------------------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
(Restated)
----------
REVENUES:
United States $186,439 $173,933
International 103,944 103,246
------- -------
$290,383 $277,179
======== ========
ASSETS:
United States $1,389,472 $1,351,997
International 980,068 1,069,497
------- ---------
$2,369,540 $2,421,494
========== ==========
Note 6 - Derivative Instruments
The Companys assets are primarily fixed rate in nature while its debt instruments are primarily floating rate. The Company employs derivative financial instruments (interest rate swap agreements) to effectively convert certain floating rate debt instruments into fixed rate instruments and thereby manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates.
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are liabilities of $24,820 and $34,026, respectively, representing the market value of the Companys interest rate swap contracts.
The unrealized pre-tax income on cash flow hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 of $7,900 and the related income tax provision of $2,280 have been recorded by the Company as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The unrealized pre-tax income on cash flow hedges for the year ended December 31, 2003 of $15,270 and the related income tax provision of $4,700 have been recorded by the Company as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) would be reclassified into earnings upon termination of these interest rate swap agreements and related debt instruments prior to their contractual maturity. The Company may at its discretion terminate or redesignate any such interest rate swap agreements prior to maturity. At that time any gains or losses on termination would continue to amortize into interest expense or interest income to correspond to the recognition of interest expense or interest income on the hedged debt. If such debt instrument was also terminated, the gain or loss associated with the terminated derivative included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at the time of termination of the debt would be recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement at that time.
The Company has recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as fair value adjustment for derivative instruments, pre-tax income of $270 and $1,304 for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2004 resulting from the change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements held which do not qualify as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. This compares to pre-tax income of $128 and $457 for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2003. Pre-tax income of $0 and $1 for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2004 resulting from interest rate swap agreements which qualify as cash flow hedges, but are not perfectly correlated have associated ineffectiveness and have been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as fair value adjustment for derivative instruments. This compares to pre-tax losses of $25 and pre-tax income of $27 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003.
As of September 30, 2004, the Company held 13 interest rate swap agreements with various financial institutions. The aggregate notional balance of the swaps was $471,463 as of September 30, 2004.
Note 7 - Contingencies and Commitments
At September 30, 2004 commitments for capital expenditures totaled approximately $125,206 with approximately $62,197 committed for the remainder of fiscal 2004. Approximately $21,003 per year is committed for years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
The Company is engaged in various legal proceedings from time to time incidental to the conduct of its business. Such proceedings may relate to claims arising out of chassis accidents that occur from time to time which involve death and injury to persons and damage to property. Accordingly, the Company requires all of its lessees to indemnify the Company against any losses arising out of such accidents while the chassis are on-hire to the lessees. In addition lessees are generally required to maintain a minimum of $2,000 in general liability insurance coverage, which is standard in the industry. In addition, the Company maintains a back-up general liability policy of $200,000, in the event that the above lessee coverage is insufficient. While the Company believes that such coverage should be adequate to cover current claims, there can be no guarantee that future claims will never exceed such amounts. Nevertheless, the Company believes that no current or potential claims of which it is aware will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations and that the Company is adequately insured against such claims.
Pending Governmental Investigations
Following the Companys announcement in July 2003 that its Audit Committee had commissioned an internal investigation by special counsel into our accounting, the Company was notified that the SEC had opened an informal investigation of Interpool. As the Company anticipated, this investigation was subsequently converted to a formal investigation and remains pending as of the date this Form 10-Q was filed with the SEC. The New York office of the SEC received a copy of the written report of the internal investigation and has received documents and information from the Company, its Audit Committee and certain other parties pursuant to SEC subpoenas. The Company was advised that the United States Attorneys office for the District of New Jersey received a copy of the written report of the internal investigation and opened a parallel investigation focusing on certain matters described in the report by the Audit Committees special counsel. The Company was informed that Interpool is neither a subject nor a target of the investigation by the U.S. Attorneys office. The Company is cooperating fully with both of these investigations.
Stockholder Litigation
In February and March 2004, several lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, by purchasers of the Companys common stock naming the Company and certain of its present and former executive officers and directors as defendants. The complaints alleged violations of the federal securities laws relating to the Companys reported Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the nine months ended September 30, 2002, which the Company announced in March 2003 would require restatement. Each of the complaints purported to be a class action brought on behalf of persons who purchased the Companys securities during a specified period. In April 2004, the lawsuits, which seek unspecified amounts of compensatory damages and costs and expenses, including legal fees, were consolidated into a single action with lead plaintiffs and lead counsel having been appointed. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint in September 2004, which includes allegations of purported misstatements and omissions in the Company's public disclosures throughout an expanded purported class period from March 31, 1999 through December 26, 2003. In November 2004, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which is currently pending. In the event the Company's motion to dismiss is denied, the Company would expect to incur additional defense costs typical of this type of class action litigation. The Company intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit but is unable at this time to ascertain the impact this litigation may have on its financial position or results of operations.
At September 30, 2004, the following guarantees were issued and outstanding:
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company executes contracts involving indemnifications standard in the industry and indemnifications specific to a transaction such as an assignment and assumption agreement. These indemnifications might include claims related to any of the following: tax matters and governmental regulations, and contractual relationships. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered by a breach of terms of the contract or by a third party claim. The Company regularly evaluates the probability of having to incur costs associated with these indemnifications and have accrued for any expected losses that are probable. The types of indemnifications for which payment are possible are as follows:
Taxes
In the ordinary course of business, the Company provides various tax-related indemnifications as part of transactions. The indemnified party typically is protected from certain events that result in a tax treatment different from that originally anticipated. The Companys liability typically is fixed when a final determination of the indemnified partys tax liability is made. In some cases, a payment under a tax indemnification may be offset in whole or in part by refunds from the applicable governmental taxing authority. The Company is party to numerous tax indemnifications and many of these indemnities do not limit potential payment; therefore, it is unable to estimate a maximum amount of potential future payments that could result from claims made under these indemnities.
Contractual Relationships
The Company entered into a number of operating leases as lessee during 2000 and 2002 in which it guaranteed a portion of the residual value of the leased equipment to the lessor. These leases have terms that expire between 7 and 10 years. If at the end of the lease term the fair market value of the equipment is below the guaranteed residual value in the agreement, the Company is liable for a percentage of the deficiency. The total of these guarantees is $12,405 of which $8,011 could be due in 4 to 5 years, with the remaining $4,394 potentially due in greater than 5 years. As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are liabilities of $177 and $144, respectively, representing the accrual for the estimated exposure under these guarantees.
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company arranged a leasing transaction between one of its major customers and a financial institution for up to 3,000 containers. As part of this transaction, the Company agreed to provide certain guarantees related to the fair value of the equipment if the lessee terminated the lease or if the lessee was unable to meet its obligations under the terms of the lease. In addition, if the lessee agreed to extend the lease, the Company agreed to purchase the equipment from the financial institution at a stated value and lease it to the lessee for this additional period at a stated lease rate. The Company further agreed to provide the lessee with a purchase option at the end of the extended lease period that would be less than the fair market value of the equipment at the date the lessee could exercise its option (the Bargain Purchase Option).
In return for the arrangement of the transaction on behalf of the financial institution and the guarantees discussed above, the Company was paid an arrangement fee and a portion of the initial rent for each container included in the lease. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 2,076 containers were delivered to the lessee and the Company received payments amounting to $1,240. The remaining 924 containers were purchased by the Company and leased to the customer under the terms of a direct financing lease.
The estimated fair value of these containers at the end of the lease term guaranteed by the Company amounts to approximately $4,360. The Company has estimated that its potential liability related to these guarantees is less than the estimated potential liability related to the Bargain Purchase Option granted to the lessee. As such, the Company has accrued for the estimated value of its liability for this Bargain Purchase Option amounting to $1,017 that could be due in greater than 5 years. All fees collected from the lessor have been deferred by the Company and included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fees received from the lessor, net of the estimated liability for the Bargain Purchase Option, are being recognized by the Company over the term of the residual guarantee.
Standby Letters of Credit
As of September 30, 2004, CAI, a consolidated subsidiary, had two outstanding letters of credit totaling $6,000, which guarantee its obligations under certain operating lease agreements. These letters of credit expire in May, 2005.
Guarantee of Unconsolidated Affiliate Debt
Since 2000, the Company has guaranteed PCR debts due to third parties totaling $5,000. At December 31, 2002, with PCR in liquidation, a determination was made that it was probable that the Company would incur costs related to this guarantee. As a result, the Company recorded a liability for $4,429 representing its guarantee of PCR debts, net of amounts collected related to PCRs liquidation. This amount is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the December 31, 2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet. The $5,000 guarantee was paid off through a secured financing arrangement completed by the Company in July 2004.
Settled Insurance Litigation
In connection with an insurance claim related to the default of a South Korean customer and a subsequent lawsuit filed by the insurance carriers against the Company, on June 17, 2004 the Company signed an agreement settling the lawsuit and its claims under the policy. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the insurance carriers agreed to pay the Company a total of $26,400 of which $17,390 was received in June 2004 and $9,010 was received in July 2004. In addition, the Company received the right to retain any of the equipment it had recovered since the date of the claim. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $6,267 related to the $26,400 settlement of the claim during the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Note 8 - July 2004 Protocol to the United States and Barbados Tax Treaty
Interpool Limited currently claims treaty benefits under the United States and Barbados income tax treaty (the Treaty). The Treaty contains a limitation on benefits provision which denies treaty benefits under certain circumstances. However, Interpool Limited did not fall within the limitation on benefits provision in the Treaty as it existed prior to December 20, 2004.
On July 14, 2004, the United States and Barbados signed a protocol to the Treaty (the Protocol) that contains a more restrictive limitation on benefits provision than the current Treaty does. On October 10, 2004, the United States Senate ratified the Protocol and on December 20, 2004, the government of Barbados also ratified the Protocol, resulting in enactment of the Protocol as of December 20, 2004 (the Enactment Date). As a result of enactment, the Protocol will generally be effective for taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 2005. When it becomes effective on January 1, 2005, the Protocol will result in Interpool Limited losing its ability to rely on the Treaty to eliminate current U.S. income tax on its container rental and container sales income until such time as it is able to satisfy the new eligibility requirements as discussed below. Under the Protocol, Interpool Limited would only be eligible for Treaty benefits with respect to its container rental and sales income if, among other things, Interpool, Inc. is listed on a recognized stock exchange (generally, the NASDAQ system or an SEC registered exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange), and Interpool, Inc.s stock is primarily and regularly traded on such exchange.
The Companys common stock is currently not listed on a recognized stock exchange within the meaning of the Protocol. Management anticipates that Interpool, Inc. will examine all of its options with regard to listing on a recognized stock exchange and, while there is no assurance that such listing will occur, management will attempt to arrange such a listing not later than the second quarter of 2005. Even in the event, however, that Interpool, Inc. is listed on a recognized stock exchange at any time after the Protocol comes into effect, it is not clear whether Interpool, Inc. would satisfy the primarily and regularly traded requirement as defined within the Protocol, although based upon the Companys historic trading levels, management is hopeful that such requirement would be satisfied.
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 109 Accounting for Income Taxes, as a result of enactment of the Protocol during the fourth quarter of 2004, the Companys existing net deferred tax liability as of the Enactment Date will need to be immediately recorded at a tax rate higher than the approximate 3% tax rate currently used. Accordingly, the Company will be required to record an increase in its net deferred tax liability during the fourth quarter of 2004. While there would be no current cash outflow associated with the increase in this net deferred tax liability, the effect of recognizing this increased net deferred tax liability will result in a substantial deferred tax expense accrual which will reduce net income for the fourth quarter and year ending December 31, 2004. The Company is unable at this time to determine the amount of this deferred tax expense accrual for the fourth quarter of 2004 but this accrual will have a material adverse effect on the Companys net income for the fourth quarter of 2004 and for the year ending December 31, 2004 as well as a material adverse effect on the Company's retained earnings. As soon as the Company is able to determine the amount of the deferred tax expense and its impact on net income for the fourth quarter and year ending December 31, 2004 and on the Company's retained earnings, the Company will publicly disclose this information by filing a Form 8-K report with the SEC.
If the Companys common stock is subsequently listed on a recognized stock exchange and it otherwise qualifies for benefits under the Treaty, the net deferred tax liability would be reduced at that time to reflect the lower tax rate of approximately 3%. This deferred tax benefit would result in additional net income at that time in an amount that may be comparable to the previous reduction in net income, except as adjusted for any change in the net deferred tax balance during the interim period. However, it is uncertain when, or if, the Company will meet the requirements of the Treaty. Beginning on January 1, 2005, the Company will accrue taxes at the higher rate until such time as it may again become eligible for Treaty benefits. The effect of such accrual on the future net income of the Company will be largely dependent upon the duration of the period between Enactment and any future listing of its common stock.
If, at any time, management determines that the Company is not likely to qualify for the Barbados treaty within a reasonable period of time, they will promptly investigate alternatives (such as other jurisdictions) that could entitle Interpool Limited to treaty benefits under another tax treaty with the U.S., but there can not be any assurance that such an alternative will be feasible. Any such alternative would likely result in Interpool Limited being subject to a higher non-U.S. tax than the approximate 3% tax rate in Barbados.
Note 9 - Subsequent Events
Financing Activities
The Company funds a significant portion of the purchase price for new containers and chassis through secured borrowings from financial institutions under various credit facilities.
On November 1, 2004, the Company consummated a secured equipment financing with one of its existing lenders. The financing is secured by shipping containers and related leases owned by a special purpose subsidiary of the Company and leased to various third parties. The financing allows for advances from time to time up to the amount of available collateral under the facility, subject to a maximum principal amount that may be outstanding under the facility of $252,000. Of the $243,000 drawn down on November 1, 2004, the Company used $224,406 to refinance outstanding indebtedness, which includes the entire $154,757 of outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility, which has now been terminated, as well as an existing $69,649 loan from this lender. The remaining balance of $18,594 was used for transaction fees and working capital purposes. The interest rate under this new facility is LIBOR plus 200 basis points, with reductions to LIBOR plus 175 basis points and LIBOR plus 150 basis points possible as the Companys credit rating or debt to equity ratio improve. This agreement requires that the Company enter into interest rate swap contracts in order to effectively convert at least seventy percent of the debt associated with operating lease equipment and ninety percent of the debt associated with direct financing leases from floating rate debt to fixed rate debt within 90 days of closing. The facility has a two-year term, after which the outstanding balance will be paid out in full over 66 months if it is not refinanced.
This agreement requires that the Company maintain a tangible net worth of at least $300,000 (as defined in the Agreement). The facility also requires the Company to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1 and a funded debt to tangible net worth ratio of 4.0 to 1.0 and contains other customary restrictive covenants.
On November 29, 2004, the Company sold $80,000 total principal amount of new 6% notes (the November notes) due 2014 to eight investors under the same indenture used for the $150,000 unsecured financing completed during September 2004. The terms of the November notes are identical to those of the notes sold during September (as described previously in this document) with the following exceptions: (1) there were no warrants associated with the November notes; and (2) the original issue discount on the November notes was approximately 14.7% versus 15.0% for the September notes. The net proceeds totaling $68,065 are being used for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to the purchase of equipment, retirement of debt, acquisitions, and/or working capital.
In addition to the revolving credit facility mentioned previously, the Company paid in full three other secured lending facilities, totaling $37,009, during November 2004, including two facilities with Yardville National Bank (a subsidiary of an entity in which the Companys Chief Executive Officer owns approximately five percent of the common stock and serves on the executive Committee of the Board of Directors).
Sale of Specialized Assets
During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company sold certain assets (with a book value of approximately $1,865) of CTC Container Trading (U.K.) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary which leased specialized cargo carrying units and other equipment for use by companies operating in the North Sea. The agreement called for the assets to be sold with an effective date of September 30, 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company sold 1,474 cargo carrying units for approximately $2,965 (1,666 British Pounds), which will result in a pre-tax profit of approximately $1,100 before expenses. The gain on the sale of these assets will be reflected in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Stockholder meeting
On December 15, 2004 the Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At the meeting the stockholders, among other actions, voted to approve the adoption of two new stock option plans, the 2004 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and Directors of Interpool, Inc. (the 2004 Plan) and the Interpool, Inc. 2004 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee, Non-Officer Directors (the 2004 Directors Plan). The 2004 Plan was adopted to replace the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan for Executive Officers and Directors, under which no further options will be granted. A total of 1.5 million shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan. Options may be granted under the 2004 Plan in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to key employees and directors (whether or not they are employees) of the Company and its subsidiaries. The 2004 Directors Plan was adopted to replace the 1993 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee, Non-Consultant Directors, under which no further options will be granted. A total of 250,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2004 Directors Plan. The 2004 Directors Plan provides for the automatic grant of nonqualified options to non-employee non-officer directors.
July 2004 Protocol to the United States and Barbados Tax Treaty
Interpool Limited currently claims treaty benefits under the United States and Barbados income tax treaty (the Treaty). The Treaty contains a limitation on benefits provision which denies treaty benefits under certain circumstances. However, Interpool Limited did not fall within the limitation on benefits provision in the Treaty as it existed prior to December 20, 2004.
On July 24, 2004, the United States and Barbados signed a protocol to the Treaty (the Protcol) that contains a more restrictive limitation on benefits provision than the current Treaty does. On October 10, 2004, the United States Senate ratified the Protocol and on December 20, 2004, the government of Barbados also ratified the Protocol, resulting in enactment of the Protocol as of December 20, 2004 (the Enactment Date). As a result of enactment, the Protocol will generally be effective for taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 2005. When it becomes effective on January 1, 2005, the Protocol will result in Interpool Limited losing its ability to rely on the Treaty to eliminate current U.S. income tax on its container rental and container sales income until such time as it is able to satisfy the new eligibility requirements as more fully described in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements July 2004 Protocol to the United States and Barbados Tax Treaty. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, as a result of enactment of the Protocol during the fourth quarter of 20