Back to GetFilings.com
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-22595
----------------
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE 72-1362492
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
525 EAST CAPITOL STREET, SUITE 402 39201
JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES)
(601) 352-1107
(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE
(TITLE OF CLASS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K ((S)229.405 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [_]
As of March 10, 1998, there were 24,492,793 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par
value, of Friede Goldman International Inc. issued and outstanding, 11,710,613
of which, having an aggregate market value of approximately $338.5 million,
were held by non-affiliates of the registrant (affiliates being, for these
purposes only, directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of
the registrant's Common Stock).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the proxy statement related to the registrant's 1998 annual
meeting of stockholders, which proxy statement will be filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 120 days of the end of the registrant's
fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, are incorporated by reference into Part
III of this Form 10-K.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business........................................................ 3
Risk Factors.................................................... 11
Item 2. Properties...................................................... 14
Item 3. Legal Proceedings............................................... 15
Item 4. Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders............. 16
Executive Officers of the Registrant............................ 16
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters............................................ 17
Item 6. Selected Financial Data......................................... 17
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.......................................... 18
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data..................... 24
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure........................................... 24
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.............. 24
Item 11. Executive Compensation.......................................... 24
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.. 24
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.................. 24
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K. 24
----------------
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other
than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-K, are forward-
looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including (i) risks of reduced levels of
demand for the Company's products and services resulting from reduced levels
of capital expenditures of oil and gas companies relating to offshore drilling
and exploration activity and reduced levels of capital expenditures of
offshore drilling contractors, which levels of capital expenditures may be
affected by prevailing oil and natural gas prices, expectations about future
oil and natural gas prices, the cost of exploring for, producing and
delivering oil and gas, the sale and expiration dates of offshore leases in
the United States and overseas, the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves
in offshore areas, local and international political and economic conditions,
the ability of oil and gas companies to access or generate capital sufficient
to fund capital expenditures for offshore exploration, development and
production activities, and other factors, (ii) risks related to expansion of
operations, either at its shipyards or one or more other locations, (iii)
operating risks relating to conversion, retrofit and repair of drilling rigs,
new construction of drilling rigs and production units and the design of new
drilling rigs, (iv) contract bidding risks, (v) risks related to dependence on
significant customers, (vi) risks related to the failure to realize the level
of backlog estimated by the Company due to determinations by one or more
customers to change or terminate all or portions of projects included in such
estimation of backlog and (vii) risks related to regulatory and environmental
matters. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary
materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Although the
Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations
will prove to have been correct.
2
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Friede Goldman International Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the
"Company") provides offshore drilling services, including conversion,
retrofit, repair and modification of offshore drilling rigs. The Company also
has the capability to design, build and equip new construction offshore
drilling rigs. The Company was formed in February 1997 to hold the combined
assets of HAM Marine, Inc. ("HAM Marine") and Friede & Goldman, Ltd. ("F&G
Ltd.") and completed an initial public offering in July of 1997. Through HAM
Marine, now a subsidiary, the Company has been continuously engaged in the
business of converting, retrofitting and repairing offshore drilling rigs
since 1982. Moreover, through F&G Ltd., also now a subsidiary, the Company has
been continuously engaged in the business of offshore rig design for more than
50 years. The Company's customers consist primarily of drilling contractors
that drill offshore exploratory and development wells for oil and gas
companies throughout the world, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico, the North
Sea and areas offshore of West Africa and South America.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
At the time of its initial public offering, the Company conducted all of its
conversion, retrofit and repair services at its 32-acre shipyard, located in
Pascagoula, Mississippi (the "Pascagoula Facility"). Since that time, the
Company has (i) opened its new shipyard on Greenwood Island, Mississippi (the
"Greenwood Island Facility"), (ii) added two Canadian shipyards to its
operations and (iii) acquired a group of affiliated French companies engaged
in the design and fabrication of marine and offshore rig deck equipment.
However, as each of these developments occurred after December 31, 1997, they
had no material effect on the Company's results of operations for the year
ended on such date.
Opening of Greenwood Island Facility. In January 1998, the Company opened
the Greenwood Island Facility, a state-of-the-art shipyard on an 85-acre site
located approximately six miles from the Pascagoula Facility. The new shipyard
was specifically designed to promote efficient construction of new offshore
drilling rigs. The Company expects the shipyard to become fully operational in
the second half of 1998. Upon completion, the new shipyard will allow the
Company to simultaneously construct, in varying phases, up to six jackup and
two semisubmersible offshore drilling rigs. The Company is currently
performing deckwork and outfitting on one Bingo 7000 design semisubmersible
drilling unit at the new shipyard.
Acquisition of Marystown Facilities. On January 1, 1998, the Company
acquired two deepwater, ice-free shipyard and fabrication facilities located
in Marystown, Newfoundland, Canada (the "Marystown Facilities") from two
entities controlled by the Province of Newfoundland. The Canadian facilities
give the Company additional shipyard capacity and proximity to drilling areas
off the eastern coast of Canada and in the North Sea. The Company paid one
dollar to acquire the shipyards, but pursuant to the terms of the acquisition
agreement, the Company also agreed to (i) maintain a minimum number of
employee manhours with respect to the acquired shipyard operations through the
year 2,000, (ii) undertake certain capital improvements at the acquired
shipyards and (iii) pay fifty percent (50%) of net after-tax profits of the
acquired shipyards for the twelve-month period ending March 31, 1998 to the
Province of Newfoundland. The Company has already subcontracted to the
Marystown Facilities certain fabrication projects related to a retrofit
project and a conversion project currently ongoing in Pascagoula.
Acquisition of BLM Companies. The Company acquired Achere, S.A., a French
societe anonyme ("Achere"), its wholly owned subsidiary France Marine S.A.
("France Marine") and the four operating subsidiaries of France Marine:
Brissoneau & Lotz Marine S.A. ("BLM"), Brissoneau & Lotz Marine Offshore, S.A.
("BLM Offshore"), BOPP S.A. ("BOPP") and Kerdranvant S.A.R.L. ("Kerdranvant")
as of February 5, 1998. These entities are collectively referred to herein as
the "BLM Companies." France Marine is a holding company, and the operating
subsidiaries are engaged in the design and fabrication of deck equipment used
by offshore drilling rigs and other marine vessels. BLM and BLM Offshore are
based in Carquefou, France (near Nantes), and BOPP and Kerdranvant have
operations in Lanveoc, France (near Brest). BLM designs and manufactures deck
machinery, including mooring, anchoring and cargo handling equipment. BLM
Offshore
3
designs and manufactures rack-and-pinion jacking systems used on offshore
drilling platforms. BOPP manufactures trawl and draw net winches for inshore
and ocean going fishing vessels and equipment for service vessels and
hydrographical survey ships. Kerdranvant manufactures hydraulic power and
rack-and-pinion steering systems used in all types of vessels. The Company
paid approximately $25 million to acquire the BLM Companies.
OVERVIEW OF OFFSHORE DRILLING EQUIPMENT
The Company's primary customers are drilling contractors with operations in
the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, offshore West Africa and South America and
other offshore areas of the world. These drilling contractors generally own
and operate offshore drilling rigs and provide drilling services to oil and
gas companies. Several factors determine the type of rig most suitable for a
particular project, the more significant of which are the marine environment,
water depth and seabed conditions at the proposed drilling location, whether
the drilling is to be done over a production platform or other fixed
structure, the intended well depth, and variable deck load and well control
requirements. A brief description of the types of offshore drilling rigs and
production units currently serviced by the Company is set forth below.
Semisubmersibles. Semisubmersible rigs consist of an upper working and
living deck resting on vertical columns connected to lower hull members. Such
rigs operate in a "semi-submerged" position, remaining afloat, in a position
which places the water-line approximately half way between the top of the
lower hulls and bottom of the deck. The rig is typically anchored in position
and remains stable for drilling in the semi-submerged floating position.
There have been four generations of semisubmersible drilling rigs, with each
successive generation incorporating improvements which enable the rigs to
drill more efficiently and in increasingly harsh marine environments. Fourth
generation semisubmersibles are typically capable of operating in water depths
of up to 5,000 feet and, in some cases, greater depths. Certain fourth
generation semisubmersibles are equipped with computer controlled thrusters to
allow for dynamic positioning of the rig, which allows it to remain on
location over a drillsite in deep waters without the use of anchors.
While the Company has performed some modification and repair work on fourth
generation semisubmersibles, the majority of the Company's work to date has
involved the retrofit and repair of earlier generation semisubmersibles which
generally operate in maximum water depths of between 1,000 to 2,000 feet. The
design of many of these semisubmersible rigs, including long fatigue-life and
advantageous stress characteristics, together with increasing demand for
deepwater drilling capabilities have made them well-suited for significant
retrofitting projects. The Company completed three projects involving
semisubmersibles in 1997 and at March 1, 1998 was working on the conversion of
three submersibles into semisubmersibles, the retrofit of one semisubmersible
for deep water, the retrofit of one DP heavy lift derrick barge and the new
build completion of one semisubmersible hull. At March 1, 1998, the Company
also had entered into contracts to convert two additional submersibles into
semisubmersibles and to perform a new build completion on one additional
semisubmersible hull.
Jackups. Jackup rigs are mobile, self-elevating drilling platforms equipped
with legs that are lowered to the ocean floor until a foundation is
established to support the drilling platform. The rig hull includes the
drilling rig, jacking system, crew quarters, loading and unloading facilities,
storage areas for bulk and liquid materials, heliport and other related
equipment. Jackups are used extensively for drilling in water depths from 20
feet to 400 feet. Some jackup rigs have a lower hull (mat) attached to the
bottom of the rig legs, while others have independent legs.
Jackup rigs can be generally characterized by their design as either slot
jackups or cantilevered jackups. Slot jackups are generally of an older
vintage and are configured for drilling operations to take place through a
slot at the aft of the hull. A slot design is generally appropriate for
drilling exploratory wells in the absence of any existing permanent structure,
such as a production platform. A cantilevered jackup can extend its drill
floor
4
and derrick and either drill exploratory wells or drill over an existing,
fixed structure, thereby permitting the rig to drill new wells or work over
existing wells through such a structure. Many slot-design rigs have been
converted to cantilever configurations. The Company completed two projects
involving jackups in 1997.
Drillships. Drillships, which are typically self-propelled, are positioned
over a drillsite through the use of either a mooring system or a computer
controlled thruster (dynamic positioning) system similar to those used on
certain fourth generation semisubmersible rigs. Drillships are capable of
operating in water depths ranging from 200 feet to 10,000 feet. The Company
did not work on any projects involving drillships in 1997.
Floating Production Facilities. A floating production facility ("FPF")
consists of a ship or semisubmersible vessel upon which drilling and
production equipment is mounted. In most cases, the hull is a converted tanker
(often referred to as a floating, production, storage and offloading, or FPSO,
unit). In addition, semisubmersible drilling units have been converted into
floating production units. In a few cases, a new hull has been purpose-built
as a FPF. For harsh weather locations, FPFs are designed with a mooring system
that provides weathervaning capability so that the FPF can be rotated on
location to minimize the effects of wave, wind and current actions. The
production risers in these FPFs are connected to the hull through a swivel
system that also accommodates the mooring system. The hull of an FPF is
typically used for on-board oil storage, which is an important feature for
remote locations where export pipelines are not available and fixed oil
storage availability is limited or nonexistent. The Company did not work on
any projects involving FPFs in 1997.
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS
In the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company's operations consisted
primarily of conversion, retrofit and repair projects for offshore drilling
contractors. Significant conversion or retrofit projects such as these
generally take eight to 14 months to complete, whereas certain repair projects
may require only one to three months to complete. The Company has not yet
undertaken any new rig construction projects. However, with the acquisition of
the deck equipment design and fabrication operations of the BLM Companies, the
Company now offers services in all phases of new offshore rig construction
from design and engineering, to manufacturing and equipment sales.
Conversions. Conversions consist generally of the conversion of one type of
drilling rig into a different type, such as the conversion of a slot jackup to
a cantilevered jackup, the conversion of a submersible rig to a
semisubmersible rig, or the conversion of a drilling rig or tanker into a FPF.
FPF conversions typically require the demolition and removal of all drilling
equipment and substructure (including the derrick system, rotary system,
tubulars, mud treating and pumping units and well control systems) and the
reconfiguration of the decks to accommodate heavy skid mounted processing
modules and production risers and handling equipment. This production
equipment is then interconnected through the installation of piping,
electrical wiring and walkways. Because production, processing and storage
facility additions typically increase a rig's variable deck load, the Company
is typically required to complete hull reinforcements and buoyancy and
stability enhancements.
The Company completed three conversions in 1997 (two involving jackups and
one involving a river barge) and at March 1, 1998 was in the process of
converting three submersibles into semisubmersibles and had entered into
contracts to convert two additional submersibles into semisubmersibles.
Retrofits. Retrofits consist generally of improvements to the technical
capabilities, tolerances and systems of drilling and production equipment.
Retrofits performed on semisubmersible rigs include buoyancy and stability
enhancements (typically pontoon extensions and additional column sponsons) and
the addition or improvement of self-propulsion systems, positioning thrusters
and self-contained mooring systems. Jackup retrofits include strengthening and
extending the rig legs and reinforcing the spud cans on the existing legs. The
Company is also capable of upgrading living quarters and facilities to
accommodate harsh environment drilling conditions and to meet North Sea
regulatory requirements, improving ventilation systems and strengthening or
replacing heliports to accommodate larger aircraft.
5
The Company completed two retrofit projects in 1997 and at March 1, 1998 was
in the process of retrofitting one semisubmersible and one DP heavy lift
derrick barge.
Repairs. The Company performs a broad range of inspection and repair work
for its clients. Necessary repairs are identified both in connection with
retrofit and conversion projects as well as in connection with periodic
inspections performed at the shipyard which are required by the U.S. Coast
Guard and by vessel classification societies such as the American Bureau of
Shipping. Rigs are typically inspected for systems operability and structural
integrity, with ultrasonic thickness gauge readings employed to detect
structural fatigue or aberrations. Repair work may include the repair or
renewal of piping, spud cans, electrical and drilling systems, removal and
replacement of deteriorated or pitted steel and blasting, coating and painting
of exterior surfaces. The Company's repair work has also included the
refurbishment of drilling systems as well as the overhaul of generators,
boilers, condensers, ballast and cargo valves, rig cranes and production
compressors.
The Company completed repair work on three rigs in 1997 and completed an
additional repair project in February of 1998.
Design and New Construction. The Greenwood Island Facility was designed
specifically for the efficient construction of new offshore drilling rigs.
Moreover, the combined capacity of the Greenwood Island Facility and the
Pascagoula Facility will allow the Company to work on new construction
projects without any significant loss in its capacity to perform conversion,
retrofit and repair projects. At March 1, 1998, the Company was working on the
new build completion of one semisubmersible hull and entered into a contract
to perform a new build completion on one additional semisubmersible hull. A
new build completion project involves the design and construction of a
drilling rig on an existing hull.
Marine Deck Equipment. With the acquisition of the BLM Companies, the
Company entered the rig equipment and rig component manufacturing market. The
BLM Companies design and manufacture mooring, anchoring, rack-and-pinion
jacking systems, cargo handling equipment and steering systems. As a result,
the Company now has the capability to outfit rigs for existing customers and
to supply other offshore rig manufacturers with rig kits consisting of legs,
jacking systems, anchoring winches and cranes.
CUSTOMERS AND MARKETING
The Company's customers are primarily offshore drilling contractors, many of
whom have been customers of the Company for more than 15 years, and the
Company believes that it has developed strong relationships with its customer
base. The Company's marketing efforts are conducted from its sales offices in
Pascagoula and Houston and target drilling contractors located primarily in
the Gulf Coast area and in Europe. The Company's sales staff attempts to
identify future contracts by contacting its clients on a regular basis (in
some cases weekly) in order to anticipate projects that will be competitively
bid or negotiated exclusively with the Company. The Company's sales force
often invites potential clients to the Pascagoula and Greenwood Island
Facilities for a tour and presentation.
A large portion of the Company's revenue has historically been generated by
a few customers although not necessarily the same customers from year-to-year.
For example, the Company's largest customers (those which individually
accounted for more than 10% of revenue in a particular year) collectively
accounted for 82%, 84% and 70% of revenue for 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively. In 1997, the Company derived more than 10% of its revenue from
each of Noble Drilling Corporation and Sedco Forex S.A. Because the level of
conversion, retrofit or repair work that the Company may provide to any
particular customer depends on the size of that customer's capital expenditure
budget devoted to such projects in a particular year, customers that account
for a significant portion of revenue in one fiscal year may represent an
immaterial portion of revenue in subsequent years.
CONTRACT STRUCTURE AND PRICING
The Company generally performs conversion, retrofit and repair services
pursuant to contracts that provide for a portion of the work to be performed
on a fixed-price basis and a portion of the work to be performed on a
6
cost-plus basis. In many cases, the Company commences work with respect to
certain portions of a drilling rig conversion, retrofit or repair project on a
cost-plus arrangement as soon as the drilling rig arrives in the Company's
shipyard and thereafter the scope and pricing arrangements with respect to
other aspects of the project are negotiated. In the interest of expediting the
completion of a conversion, retrofit or repair project, a drilling rig may
arrive in the Company's shipyard before the design work for such project is
finished or before all necessary budgetary approval for such project has been
reviewed at the appropriate level of management of the customer. In many of
these cases, the portion of the project as to which no firm pricing
arrangement has been agreed to at the time the drilling rig arrives at the
Company's shipyard ultimately becomes a significant portion of the overall
project. In addition, the scope of the services to be performed with respect
to a particular drilling rig often increases as the project progresses due to
additional retrofits or modifications requested by the customer or additional
repair work necessary to meet the safety, environmental or construction
standards established by the U.S. Coast Guard or other regulatory or vessel
classification authorities.
With respect to the fixed-price portions of a project, the Company receives
the price fixed in the contract for such aspect of the project, subject to
adjustment only for change orders placed by the customer. The Company
typically receives a significant number of change orders on each of its fixed-
price projects as to which the Company and its customer negotiate a separate
charge. With respect to fixed-price contracts, the Company generally retains
the ability to capture cost savings and must absorb cost over-runs. Under
cost-plus arrangements, the Company receives specified amounts in excess of
its direct labor and materials cost and so is protected against cost overruns
but does not benefit directly from cost savings. The Company generally prices
materials at a mark-up under its contracts. The Company believes that recently
it has realized a majority of its revenue under fixed-price contracts,
although historically the percentages of revenue it has derived from fixed-
price contracts and cost-plus contracts have fluctuated significantly from
project to project and from period to period based on the nature of the
projects involved, the type of pricing arrangements preferred by its
customers, the timing of the commencement of work on a project in relation to
the timing of the completion of the negotiation and contracting process, and
other factors.
COMPETITION
The Company has two primary domestic competitors for conversion, retrofit
and repair projects for drilling rigs that operate in the Gulf of Mexico. In
international markets, the Company competes primarily with two additional
companies. The Company believes it competes favorably against companies
located in Europe or the Far East for conversion, retrofit and repair projects
relating to drilling rigs operating in the Gulf of Mexico and, to a lesser
extent, rigs operating offshore West Africa and South America due to, among
other things, high European labor costs and the Company's favorable geographic
location. The Company believes that the addition of the Marystown Facilities
will further enable the Company to compete favorably for conversion, retrofit
and repair projects relating to drilling rigs operating in the North Sea and
offshore Canada. The Company expects that one other shipyard will compete for
fabrication projects on the eastern coast of Canada. The Company believes that
its low cost structure in Canada allows it to compete favorably in bidding for
future work in that country.
The Company believes that its reputation for quality and reliability, its
long-standing relationships with most of the large drilling contractors, its
experienced management team, its existing skilled labor force and its
extensive fabrication experience with drilling rigs are its key advantages in
competing for projects. The Company considers four domestic and five foreign
international companies to be its primary competitors in the new rig
construction business. The Company believes that its long involvement in the
design of new drilling rigs and production units will provide it with a
competitive advantage with respect to the new rig construction business.
The Company believes that certain barriers exist that prevent new companies
from competing with the Company for conversion, retrofit and repair
activities, as well as for new rig construction activity, including the
investment required to establish an adequate facility, the difficulty of
locating a facility adjacent to an adequate waterway due to environmental and
wetland regulations, and the limited availability of experienced supervisory
and management personnel. Although new companies can enter the market for
small projects more easily,
7
management believes these factors will likely prevent an increase in domestic
competition for larger projects, especially major conversions and retrofits
and new rig construction.
The Company has two principal global competitors, both based in the United
States, in the design and manufacture of deck equipment. However, prior to
their acquisition by the Company, the BLM Companies did not actively market in
the United States and competed against the other two companies primarily
outside the United States. The Company plans to immediately begin marketing
its product line of anchoring winches, cranes for jackup and semisubmersible
drilling units, mooring equipment, deck machinery, jacking equipment and
skidding equipment in the United States. Plans are underway to increase the
capacity of the fabrication facilities in France and to develop production
capability in North America. The Company anticipates that products of the BLM
Companies will be produced domestically within 12 months.
BACKLOG
As of December 31, 1997, the Company's backlog was approximately $324.6
million, approximately two-thirds of which management expects to be performed
within the 12 months ending December 31, 1998. The Company's backlog as of
December 31, 1996 was approximately $15 million.
The Company's backlog is based on management's estimate of future revenue
attributable to (i) the remaining amounts to be invoiced with respect to those
projects, or portions of projects, as to which a customer has authorized the
Company to begin work or purchase materials and (ii) projects, or portions of
projects, that have been awarded to the Company as to which the Company has
not commenced work. Management's estimates are often based on incomplete
engineering and design specifications and as engineering and design plans are
finalized or changes to existing plans are made, management's estimate of the
total revenue for such projects is likely to change. In addition, all projects
currently included in the Company's backlog are subject to termination at the
option of the customer, although the customer in that case is generally
required to pay the Company for work performed and materials purchased.
MATERIALS
The principal materials used by the Company in its fabrication business are
standard steel shapes, steel plate, pipe, welding wire and gases, fuel oil,
gasoline and paint. The Company believes that such materials are currently
available in adequate supply from many sources. The Company does not depend
upon any single supplier or source.
SAFETY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Management is concerned with the safety and health of the Company's
employees and maintains a stringent safety assurance program to reduce the
possibility of accidents. The Company's safety department establishes
guidelines to ensure compliance with all applicable foreign, federal and state
safety regulations. At its Mississippi facilities, the Company provides
training and safety education through orientations for new employees and
subcontractors, weekly crew safety meetings and first aid and CPR training.
The Company also employs a registered nurse as an in-house medic. The Company
has a comprehensive drug program and conducts periodic employee health
screenings. A safety committee, whose members consist of management
representatives and field supervisors, meet monthly to discuss safety concerns
and suggestions that could prevent future accidents. The Company has
contracted with a third party safety consultant to provide training and
suggestions and a licensed emergency medical technician in its ongoing
commitment to a safe and healthy work environment. The Company expects to
institute similar practices at its foreign facilities to the extent not
already in place. The Company believes that its safety program and commitment
to quality are vital to attracting and retaining customers and employees.
The Company's Pascagoula and Greenwood Island Facilities fabricate according
to the standards of the American Bureau of Shipping, Det Norski Veritas,
American Petroleum Institute, the American Welding Society, the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers and specific customer specifications. The
Company's
8
international operations fabricate according to certain of the above standards
and certain additional standards, including those of the Lloyds Registry of
Shipping, the Canadian Welding Bureau and Bureau Veritas. All of the Company's
welding and fabrication procedures are performed in accordance with the latest
technology and industry requirements. The Company also maintains training
programs at each of its facilities to train skilled personnel and to maintain
high quality standards. Management believes that these programs enhance the
quality of its products and reduce their repair rate.
GOVERNMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
Overview. Many aspects of the Company's operations and properties are
materially affected by foreign, federal, state and local regulation, as well
as certain international conventions and private industry organizations. These
regulations govern worker health and safety and the manning, construction and
operation of vessels. For example, the Company is subject to the jurisdiction
of the U.S. Coast Guard, the National Transportation Safety Board, the U.S.
Customs Service and the Maritime Administration of the U.S. Department of
Transportation, as well as private industry organizations such as the American
Bureau of Shipping. These organizations establish safety criteria and are
authorized to investigate vessel accidents and recommend improved safety
standards. In addition, the exploration and development of oil and gas
properties located on the outer continental shelf of the United States is
regulated primarily by the Minerals Management Service ("MMS"). The MMS has
promulgated federal regulations under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
requiring the construction of offshore platforms located on the outer
continental shelf to meet stringent engineering and construction
specifications. Violations of these regulations and related laws can result in
substantial civil and criminal penalties as well as injunctions curtailing
operations. The Company believes that its operations are in compliance with
these and all other regulations affecting the fabrication of platforms for
delivery to the outer continental shelf of the United States.
In addition, the Company depends on the demand for its services from the oil
and gas industry and, therefore, is affected by changing taxes, price controls
and other laws and regulations relating to the oil and gas industry. For
example, the U.S. Coast Guard regulates and enforces various aspects of marine
offshore vessel operations, such as certification, routes, drydocking
intervals, manning requirements, tonnage requirements and restrictions, hull
and shafting requirements and vessel documentation. U.S. Coast Guard
regulations require that all drilling and production vessels are drydocked for
inspection at least once within a five-year period, and such inspections and
resulting repair requirements constitute a significant portion of the
Company's revenues. While the Company is not aware of any proposals to reduce
the frequency or scope of such inspections, any such reduction could adversely
affect the Company's results of operations. In addition, offshore construction
and drilling in certain areas have been opposed by environmental groups and,
in certain areas, has been restricted. To the extent laws are enacted or other
governmental actions are taken that prohibit or restrict offshore construction
and drilling or impose environmental protection requirements that result in
increased costs to the oil and gas industry in general and the offshore
construction industry in particular, the business and prospects of the Company
could be adversely affected. The Company cannot determine to what extent
future operations and earnings of the Company may be affected by new
legislation, new regulations or changes in existing regulations.
The Company has recently purchased a towable drydock vessel. Employees of
the Company who are engaged in offshore activities relating to such vessel may
be covered by the provisions of the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act
and general maritime law, which laws operate to make the liability limits
established under state workers' compensation laws inapplicable to these
employees and, instead, permit them or their representatives to pursue actions
against the Company for damages or job related injuries, with generally no
limitations on the Company's potential liability.
Environmental. The Company's operations and properties are subject to a wide
variety of increasingly complex and stringent foreign, federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations, including those governing discharges
into the air and water, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous
wastes, the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated by hazardous
substances and the health and safety of employees. These laws may provide for
"strict liability" for damages to natural resources and threats to public
health and safety, rendering a party liable for the environmental damage
without regard to negligence or fault on
9
the part of such party. Sanctions for noncompliance may include revocation of
permits, corrective action orders, administrative or civil penalties and
criminal prosecution. Certain environmental laws provide for strict, joint and
several liability for remediation of spills and other releases of hazardous
substances, as well as damage to natural resources. In addition, the Company
may be subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as a
result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances. Such laws and regulations
may also expose the Company to liability for the conduct of or conditions
caused by others, or for acts of the Company that were in compliance with all
applicable laws at the time such acts were performed.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980, as amended, and similar laws provide for responses to and liability for
releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Additionally, the Clean
Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the
Safe Drinking Water Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know
Act, each as amended, and similar foreign, state or local counterparts to
these federal laws, regulate air emissions, water discharges, hazardous
substances and wastes, and require public disclosure related to the use of
various hazardous substances. For example, the Company's paint operations must
comply with a number of environmental regulations. All blasting and painting
is done in accordance with the requirements of the Company's air discharge
permit and disposal of paint waste is made in accordance with the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System storm water pollution plan. Lead based
paint is vacuum blasted and all blasting debris is contained for hazardous
waste disposal. Company policy requires that existing coating be sampled and
tested prior to blasting operations to eliminate the possibility of lead
contamination and to assure that lead based paint is appropriately treated.
The Company has been classified as a "large quantity hazardous waste
generator" and is registered with the State of Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality as such. Compliance with these and other environmental
laws and regulations may require the acquisition of permits or other
authorizations for certain activities and compliance with various standards or
procedural requirements. The Company believes that its facilities are in
substantial compliance with current regulatory standards.
In connection with the Company's purchase of the Marystown Facilities, the
Newfoundland provincial government agreed to carry out and pay for a complete
environmental assessment and remediation program. The Phase I investigation
identified several issues that may have caused subsurface contamination on
site at one of the Marystown Facilities. The Phase II investigation is
scheduled to begin within the next several months. The Newfoundland provincial
government has agreed to bear the cost of remediation procedures associated
with the Marystown Facilities and to indemnify the Company against any
environmental liabilities associated therewith.
The Company's fabrication site in Carquefou, France was named a "classified
installation" under French environmental law. Under French law, the operator
of a "classified installation" has various obligations with respect to the
site, including compliance with certain operating activities and clean-up
obligations upon cessation of the classified activity. In addition, the French
authorities may assess fines in the event of non-performance by the operator.
As a "classified installation", the site operates under an Arrete Prefectoral,
or administrative authorization, issued by regional environmental authorities.
An administrative authorization with respect to the Carquefou site was granted
in July of 1984 and renewed in January 1991. The administrative authorization
requires, among other things, that the Company follow any instructions that
authorities may impose in the interest of public health and agriculture and
gives them the right to conduct tests on air and waste quality at the site at
any time. The Company does not believe that "classified installation" status
of the Carquefou site or the requirements of the administrative authorization
will have a material effect on its operations.
The Company's compliance with environmental laws and regulations has
entailed certain additional expenses and changes in operating procedures. The
Company believes that compliance with these laws and regulations will not have
a material adverse effect on the Company's business or financial condition for
the foreseeable future. However, future events, such as changes in existing
laws and regulations or their interpretation, more vigorous enforcement
policies of regulatory agencies, or stricter or different interpretations of
existing laws and regulations, may require additional expenditures by the
Company, which expenditures may be material.
10
Health and Safety Matters. The Company's facilities and operations are
governed by laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety
and Health Act, relating to worker health and workplace safety. The Company
believes that appropriate precautions are taken to protect employees and
others from workplace injuries and harmful exposure to materials handled and
managed at its facilities. While it is not anticipated that the Company will
be required in the near future to expend material amounts by reason of such
health and safety laws and regulations, the Company is unable to predict the
ultimate cost of compliance with these changing regulations.
INSURANCE
The Company maintains insurance against property damage caused by fire,
flood, explosion and similar catastrophic events that may result in physical
damage or destruction to the Company's domestic and international facilities.
The Company also maintains commercial general liability insurance including
ship repairers' legal liability coverage and builders' risk coverage if
required. The Company has workers' compensation and employers' liability
insurance with respect to its Mississippi operations that satisfies the
Mississippi Workers' Compensation Act and includes the U.S. Longshore and
Harbor Workers Act and maritime and outer continental shelf endorsements. The
Company currently maintains excess and umbrella policies in addition to
primary liability insurance for up to (i) a $20 million limit with respect to
its Mississippi operation, (ii) a $30 million limit with respect to its
Canadian operations and (iii) a FRF100 million limit with respect to its
French operations. Other coverages currently in place include water pollution,
aviation, automobile and commercial crime coverage. Although management
believes that the Company's insurance is adequate with respect to all of its
domestic and international operations there can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to maintain adequate insurance at rates which management
considers commercially reasonable, nor can there be any assurance such
coverage will be adequate to cover all claims that may arise.
EMPLOYEES
The Company's workforce varies based on the level of ongoing fabrication
activity at any particular time. As of December 31, 1997, the Company had
approximately 1,120 employees. In addition, the Company added approximately
750 employees in connection with the acquisition of the Marystown Facilities
and approximately 240 employees in connection with the acquisition of the BLM
Companies. For the last several years, substantially all of the Company's work
force has been leased to the Company by employee leasing companies serving the
Company exclusively. In exchange for its leasing services, these employee
leasing companies charged the Company an amount which covered wages paid to
such employees, together with a mark-up designed to cover health and workers'
compensation insurance, the provision of a 401(k) plan, payroll taxes, all
other required insurance and a nominal return to such companies. Payments for
contract labor totaled approximately $10.9 million in 1997. All contract
leasing arrangements were terminated as of May 18, 1997, and the Company now
directly employs its employees at levels of wages and benefits substantially
equivalent to those formerly provided by the employee leasing companies. The
Company believes that the cost of directly employing its laborers will be
essentially the same as the historic cost of the employee leasing arrangement
most recently terminated.
None of the Company's United States employees is employed pursuant to a
collective bargaining agreement. The Company entered into a five-year
collective bargaining agreement with three Canadian unions in connection with
the acquisition of the Marystown Facilities. The Company is currently subject
to two collective bargaining agreements with respect to its French employees.
The Company is a member of two employers' federations which are party to the
respective collective bargaining agreements. The collective bargaining
agreements have no expiration date and, under French law, remain in force
unless canceled or modified. The Company believes that its relationship with
its employees is good.
11
RISK FACTORS
DEPENDENCE ON CONDITIONS IN THE OFFSHORE DRILLING INDUSTRY
The Company's business and operations depend principally upon conditions
prevailing in the offshore drilling industry. In particular, the level of
demand for the Company's services is affected by the level of demand for the
services of offshore drilling contractors, which in turn is dependent upon the
condition of the oil and gas industry and, in particular, the level of capital
expenditures of oil and gas companies with respect to offshore drilling
activities. These capital expenditures are influenced by prevailing oil and
natural gas prices, expectations about future prices, the cost of exploring
for, producing and delivering oil and gas, the sale and expiration dates of
offshore leases in the United States and overseas, the discovery rate of new
oil and gas reserves in offshore areas, local and international political and
economic conditions, and the ability of oil and gas companies to access or
generate capital sufficient to fund capital expenditures for offshore
exploration, development and production activities. Oil prices have declined
significantly in recent months, and over the past several years, oil and
natural gas prices and the level of offshore drilling and exploration activity
have fluctuated substantially. A significant or prolonged reduction in oil or
natural gas prices in the future would likely depress offshore drilling and
development activity. A substantial reduction of such activity would reduce
demand for the Company's services and could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
INTEGRATION OF ACQUISITIONS/MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH
The Company does not have an operating history with respect to the Marystown
Facilities or the BLM Companies. The acquisitions will cause a significant
increase in the Company's costs due to increased labor, lease rental and
depreciation, amortization and interest expenses in 1998. The Company's
management expects the increase in such costs will directly correlate to
anticipated increases in revenue from increased construction, conversion,
retrofit and repair activity. If such activity fails to increase to the extent
management anticipates, the Company's financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely effected.
The acquisition of the Marystown Facilities and the BLM Companies as well as
the development of a new drilling rig construction business represent a
significant expansion of the Company's operations and expose the Company to
additional business and operating risks and uncertainties. Such risks and
uncertainties include, among others, the ability of management of the Company
to effectively manage the expanded activities, the ability of the Company to
realize its investment in its expanded facilities, and the ability of the
Company to meet the contract obligations included in its backlog. In addition,
there can be no assurance that the Company's systems, procedures and controls
will be adequate to support the Company's operations as they expand. If the
Company is unable to manage its growth efficiently or effectively, or if it is
unable to attract and retain additional qualified management personnel and
skilled laborers, there could be a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial condition and results of operations.
OPERATING RISKS
The Company's activities relating to conversion, retrofit and repair of
drilling rigs and its proposed activities relating to new construction of
drilling rigs and production units involve the fabrication and refurbishment
of large steel structures, the operation of cranes and other heavy machinery
and other operating hazards that can cause personal injury or loss of life,
severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment and suspension of
operations. The failure of the structure of a drilling rig after the rig
leaves the Company's shipyard can result in similar injuries and damages. In
addition, the Company's employees who are engaged in offshore operations are
covered by provisions of the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act and
general maritime law, which laws operate to exempt these employees from the
limits of liability established under worker's compensation laws and, instead,
permit them or their representatives to maintain actions against the Company
for damages or job-related injuries, with no limitations on the Company's
potential liability. The operation of the Company's drydock vessel can give
rise to large and varied liability risks, such as risks of collisions with
other vessels or structures, sinkings, fires and other marine casualties,
which could result in significant claims for damages against
12
both the Company and third parties for, among other things, personal injury,
death, property damage, pollution and loss of business. The failure to
adequately design a drilling rig or production unit could also result in
personal injury, loss of life or severe damage to and destruction of property
and equipment. Litigation arising from any such occurrences may result in the
Company being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting large claims. In
addition, due to their proximity to the Gulf of Mexico, the Company's
facilities are subject to the possibility of physical damage caused by
hurricanes or flooding.
RISKS OF INADEQUATE INSURANCE
Although the Company maintains such insurance protection as it considers
economically prudent, there can be no assurance that any such insurance will
be sufficient or effective under all circumstances or against all hazards to
which the Company may be subject. In particular, due to the high cost of
errors and omissions policies relating to the design of drilling rigs and
production units, the Company does not carry insurance covering claims for
personal injury, loss of life or property damage relating to such design
activity. A successful claim for which the Company is not fully insured could
have a material adverse effect on the Company. Moreover, no assurance can be
given that the Company will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the
future at rates that it considers economical.
CONTRACT BIDDING RISKS
Due to the nature of the drilling rig construction industry, the Company
generally performs a portion of the work on each project on a fixed-price
basis and a portion of the work on a cost-plus basis, particularly for
projects completed in stages. With respect to the fixed-price portions of a
project, the Company receives the price fixed for such portion, and therefore
the Company must absorb any cost overruns relating to such portion of the
project. Under cost-plus arrangements, the Company receives its direct labor
cost and material cost plus specified percentages of such labor costs and
material costs. As a result, the Company is protected against cost overruns
under these cost-plus arrangements but does not benefit directly from cost
savings. See "Business--Contract Structure and Pricing."
The revenue and costs associated with the fixed-price portion of any
particular project will often vary from the amounts originally estimated
because of variations in the cost of labor and materials and variations in
productivity of labor from the original estimates. These variations and the
risks inherent in the drilling rig construction industry may result in revenue
and gross profits different from those originally estimated and may result in
reduced profitability or losses on projects. Depending on the size of a
project, variations from estimated performance may have a significant impact
on the Company's operating results for any particular fiscal quarter or year.
PERCENTAGE-OF-COMPLETION ACCOUNTING
Most of the Company's revenue is earned on a percentage-of-completion basis
based generally on the ratio of total costs incurred to the total estimated
costs. Accordingly, contract price and cost estimates are reviewed
periodically as the work progresses, and adjustments to income proportionate
to the percentage of completion are reflected in the period when such
estimates are revised. To the extent that these adjustments result in a
reduction or elimination of previously reported profits, the Company would
have to recognize a charge against current earnings, which may be significant
depending on the size of the project or the adjustment. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
DEPENDENCE ON SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
A large portion of the Company's revenue has historically been generated by
a few customers, although not necessarily the same customers from year to
year. For the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, the Company's
largest customers (those which individually accounted for more than 10% of
revenue in a particular year) collectively accounted for 82%, 84% and 70% of
revenue, respectively. For 1997, the Company derived
13
more than 10% of its revenue from Noble Drilling Corporation and Sedco Forex
S.A. Because the level of services that the Company may provide to any
particular customer depends on that customer's needs for drilling rig
conversion, retrofit or repairs in a particular year, customers that account
for a significant portion of revenue in one fiscal year may represent an
immaterial portion of revenue in subsequent years. However, the loss of a
significant customer for any reason, including a sustained decline in that
customer's capital expenditure budget or competitive factors, could result in
a substantial loss of revenue and could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's operating performance. See "Business--Customers and Marketing."
BACKLOG
The Company's backlog is based on management's estimate of future revenue
attributable to (i) the remaining amounts to be invoiced with respect to those
projects, or portions of projects, as to which a customer has authorized the
Company to begin work or purchase materials and (ii) projects, or portions of
projects, that have been awarded to the Company as to which the Company has
not commenced work. All projects currently included in the Company's backlog
are subject to change and/or termination at the option of the customer, either
of which could substantially change the amount of backlog currently reported.
In the case of a termination, the customer is required to pay the Company for
work performed and materials purchased through the date of termination;
however, due to the large dollar amounts of backlog estimated for each of a
small number of projects, amounts included in the Company's backlog could
decrease substantially if one or more of these projects were to be terminated
by one or more of the Company's customers. In particular, approximately 25% of
the Company's backlog as of December 31, 1997 was attributable to three
projects, all of which were with one customer. A termination of one or more of
these large projects or the loss of a significant customer could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's revenue, net income and cash flow for
1998. See "Business--Backlog."
REGULATORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company's operations and properties are subject to and affected by
various types of governmental regulation, including numerous foreign, federal,
state and local environmental protection laws and regulations, compliance with
which is becoming increasingly complex, stringent and expensive. These laws
may provide for "strict liability" for damages to natural resources or threats
to public health and safety, rendering a party liable for the environmental
damage without regard to its negligence or fault. Sanctions for noncompliance
may include revocation of permits, corrective action orders, administrative or
civil penalties and criminal prosecution. Certain environmental laws provide
for strict, joint and several liability for remediation of spills and other
releases of hazardous substances. In addition, companies may be subject to
claims alleging personal injury or property damage as a result of alleged
exposure to hazardous substances. Such laws and regulations may also expose
the Company to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others, or
for acts of the Company that were in compliance with all applicable laws at
the time such acts were performed. In addition, the Company depends on the
demand for its services from the oil and gas industry and is affected by
changing taxes, price controls and other laws and regulations relating to the
oil and gas industry generally. The adoption of laws and regulations
curtailing exploration and development drilling for oil and gas for economic,
environmental and other policy reasons would adversely affect the Company's
operations by limiting demand for its services. The Company cannot determine
to what extent future operations and earnings of the Company may be affected
by new legislation, new regulations or changes in existing regulations. See
"Business--Government and Environmental Regulation."
FRIEDE ACQUISITION DEFAULT PROVISIONS
In connection with the acquisition of F&G Ltd. in December 1996 by a
predecessor to the Company, the Company is obligated to pay the former owner
(i) certain design and licensing payments on sales by F&G Ltd. of designs for
new-build vessels and (ii) specified payments in the event the Company fails
to design at least 20% of the new-build vessels ordered by U.S.-based drilling
companies (subject to a maximum payment of $1 million per year), in each case
with respect to a 10-year period that commenced in December 1996. In the event
14
the Company fails to make such required payments, the former owner will have
the right to (i) require the Company to return all F&G Ltd. assets purchased
by the Company (including the design for drilling rigs and production units in
existence at the time of the acquisition but excluding the name Friede &
Goldman and derivatives thereof and excluding new designs developed by the
Company after the acquisition) and (ii) terminate the consulting and
noncompetition provisions of such acquisition.
OBLIGATIONS TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM EMPLOYMENT LEVELS
In connection with its acquisition of the Marystown Facilities and the
construction of the Greenwood Island Facility, the Company agreed to maintain
certain minimum levels of employment at each facility and is subject to
financial penalties if it fails to do so. Under the terms of its acquisition
of the Marystown Facilities, the Company is obligated to maintain a minimum of
1.2 million employee manhours (including manhours for management, labor,
salaried and hourly employees) with respect to the shipyard operations
acquired by the Company for each of the 1998, 1999 and 2000 calendar years.
The Company agreed to pay liquidated damages of C$10 million for 1998 and C$5
million in 1999 and 2000 if such minimum number of manhours is not attained in
such year. In addition, the County of Jackson, Mississippi has begun dredging
the ship channel and building roads and other infrastructure related to the
Greenwood Island Facility, under an economic incentive program. However, in
the event that the Company does not maintain a minimum employment level of 400
jobs at the Greenwood Island Facility for each year during the primary term of
its 20-year lease, the Company could face statutory penalties under
Mississippi law, which include the repayment of the remaining balance of the
$6 million loan incurred by the county to finance such improvements.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL
The Company's operations are dependent on the continued efforts of its
executive officers. Although each of the Company's executive officers has
entered into an employment agreement with the Company, there can be no
assurance that any individual will continue in such capacity for any
particular period of time. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to hire
and retain qualified employees, could have an adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company does not
carry key-person life insurance on any of its employees.
CONTROL BY EXISTING MANAGEMENT AND STOCKHOLDERS
The Company's executive officers and directors beneficially own 52.2% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock. In addition, J. L. Holloway, the Company's
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, beneficially
owns 42.5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Consequently, these
persons, if they were to act together, would have the ability to exercise
control over the Company's affairs, to elect the entire Board of Directors and
to control the disposition of any matter submitted to a vote of stockholders.
ITEM 2. PROPERTY
Pascagoula Facility. The Company's original shipyard is located on the
Pascagoula River in Pascagoula, Mississippi. The shipyard occupies 32 acres
and includes a 1,000 foot long concrete cap pile reinforced dock with 38 feet
of water depth dockside. The shipyard is adjacent to the port's turning basin
and has unobstructed access to the Gulf of Mexico. The shipyard includes
approximately 13,000 square feet of office space, a 20,000 square foot
building used for engineering and administrative personnel, a 4,500 square
foot pipe shop, a 7,500 square foot structural shop and 24,000 square feet of
fabrication platens. The Company leases the shipyard from the Jackson County
Port Authority pursuant to a long-term lease which expires in May 2005 with
two additional ten-year options for renewal. In December 1996, the Company
entered into a two-year lease for 522.5 additional feet of dockspace and
160,000 additional square feet of covered fabrication areas adjacent to its
current facility.
15
Greenwood Island Facility. The Company also operates a new shipyard on 85
acres located approximately six miles from the Pascagoula Facility. The
shipyard opened in January 1998 and all manufacturing components are expected
to be fully operational by June of 1998. The new shipyard has approximately 35
feet of water depth dockside and unobstructed access to the Gulf of Mexico.
The new shipyard features state-of-the-art design, including automated
construction equipment, floating and dockside cranes, panel lines, launchways
and 2,000 feet of reinforced bulkhead dockspace and an additional 1,950 feet
of dockspace that could be developed in the future. The Company leases the
Greenwood Island Facility from Jackson County, Mississippi pursuant to a long-
term lease which expires in June 2017 with three additional extensions of ten
years each. Upon completion, the new shipyard will contain an assembly area
covering in excess of 300,000 square feet, an 85,000 square foot fabrication
building and pipe shop, a 15,000 square foot machinery building, a 20,000
square foot office building and a 20,000 square foot warehouse. Other planned
buildings will house a welding shop, leg shop, paint storage, bulk gas
storage, air compressor facilities, a safety building and warehouse space. The
office building is expected to be completed in the second half of 1998. In
addition, the County of Jackson, Mississippi has begun dredging the ship
channel and building roads and other infrastructure related to the Greenwood
Island Facility, under an economic incentive program. However, in the event
that the new shipyard does not maintain a minimum level of employment for each
year during the primary term of the lease, the Company could face statutory
penalties under Mississippi law.
Marystown Facilities.
The Company recently acquired two deepwater, ice-free shipyard and
fabrication facilities located in Marystown, Newfoundland, Canada. The two
shipyards are located six miles apart and cover an aggregate of 38.5 acres.
The shipyards have approximately 9 and 15 meters of minimum dockside water
depth, respectively, and unobstructed access to open water. The shipyards have
approximately 230 and 330 meters of dockspace, respectively. The Company owns
the Marystown Facilities in fee simple. The Company also assumed five water
lot leases with the Canadian government which run through 2015 covering the
water area next to each of the Marystown Facilities.
French Properties.
Through the BLM Companies, the Company operates two deck equipment
fabrication facilities in Carquefou and Lanveoc, France. The facilities cover
an aggregate of approximately 100,000 square meters, and the Company owns the
French fabrication facilities in fee simple. The Company also leases office
space in Carquefou.
Other Properties.
The Company leases office space in Jackson, Mississippi, New Orleans,
Louisiana and Houston, Texas.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to various routine legal proceedings primarily
involving commercial claims and workers' compensation claims. While the
outcome of these claims and legal proceedings cannot be predicted with
certainty, management believes that the outcome of all such proceedings, even
if determined adversely, would not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter
ended December 31, 1997. However, on January 16, 1998, at a Special Meeting of
Stockholders called by the Board of Directors, the stockholders of the Company
approved and adopted an amendment to the Company's charter increasing the
number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $.01 ("Common Stock"),
of the Company from 25 million shares to 125 million shares.
16
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The Executive Officers of the Company are elected annually to serve for the
ensuing year or until their successors have been elected. The following table
sets forth certain information with respect to the executive officers of the
Company:
NAME AGE* POSITION
---- ---- --------
J. L. Holloway............. 53 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Carl M. Crawford........... 54 Executive Vice President
John F. Alford............. 38 Executive Vice President--Acquisitions
Richard L. Marler.......... 55 Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Marshall D. Lynch.......... 43 Chief Financial Officer
James A. Lowe, III......... 40 General Counsel and Secretary
Ronald W. Schnoor.......... 44 President, HAM Marine
- --------
* As of March 10, 1998
Set forth below are descriptions of the backgrounds of the executive
officers and directors of the Company and their principal occupations for the
past five years:
J. L. Holloway has served as the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company since April 1997. In addition, Mr.
Holloway has served as the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of HAM Marine from its formation in 1982 until April 1997, and from
April 1997 Mr. Holloway has been the Chairman of the Board of HAM Marine. Mr.
Holloway also serves as a Director of Delta Health Group, a company that
operates and manages health care facilities in the South and as President of
State Street Properties, Inc., a commercial real estate development firm
headquartered in Mississippi.
Carl M. Crawford has served as Executive Vice President of the Company since
May 1997. Mr. Crawford also serves as the Executive Vice President of HAM
Marine, a position he has held for more than the last five years. Prior to
joining HAM Marine in 1982, Mr. Crawford had been employed in management and
marketing positions with a number of equipment and manufacturing companies.
John F. Alford has served as Executive Vice President--Acquisitions of the
Company since December 1997. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company from May 1997 to December 1997. Mr. Alford
joined HAM Marine in 1996. Mr. Alford began his career in banking and
previously served as a member of the Board of Directors and as Chief Operating
Officer of Baton Rouge Bank and Trust Company, and a related financial firm,
for more than the past five years.
Richard L. Marler joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer in July 1997. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Marler was a Vice
President of Ingalls Shipbuilding, Litton Industries, where he was employed
for 23 years. At Ingalls Shipbuilding, Mr. Marler was involved in program
management, business development, contracts management, estimating and related
business activities.
Marshall D. Lynch joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer in December
1997. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lynch was Vice President--Financial
Operations for the Southern Region of American Medical Response, Inc. from
June 1996 through December 1997. Previously Mr. Lynch was the Chief Financial
Officer for Phillips Colleges, Inc., a national chain of proprietary colleges
from December 1991 through May 1996.
James A. Lowe, III has served as General Counsel and Secretary of the
Company since May 1997. Mr. Lowe joined HAM Marine on January 1, 1997 as
General Counsel. He has also served as Director of HAM Marine and Director and
Secretary of Friede & Goldman since February 1997. Prior to joining HAM
Marine, Mr. Lowe was an attorney with the firm of Watkins & Eager PLLC, a law
firm in Jackson, Mississippi, for seven years, the last four of which he was a
member of such firm.
17
Ronald W. Schnoor has served as President of HAM Marine since April 1997 and
a Director of the Company since May 1997. Previously, Mr. Schnoor served as
the Vice President, Manager of Operations of HAM Marine since 1992. Mr.
Schnoor joined HAM Marine in 1984 and previously served as both Senior Project
Engineer and as a Project Manager.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market. At March
10, 1998, there were 112 stockholders of record of the Common Stock. The
Company estimates that an additional 8,956 stockholders held the Common Stock
in street name as of such date. The Company's Common Stock was first listed
for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market on July 22, 1997. The following
table sets forth the high and low sales price per share of the Common Stock,
as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market, for the periods indicated. On October
1, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a two-for-one stock
split in the form of a stock dividend on each share of Common Stock.
SALES
PRICE(1)
-------- CASH
PERIOD HIGH LOW DIVIDEND
------ ---- --- --------
July 22, 1997 through September 30, 1997........... 30 11 13/16 N/A
Quarter ended December 31, 1997.................... 46 26 5/16 N/A
- --------
(1) Adjusted for two-for-one stock split, effective October 10, 1997.
The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable
future. The Company expects that it will retain all available earnings
generated by the Company's operations for the development and growth of its
business. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will be made
at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the Company's
operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, general business
condition and other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.
18
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected historical financial data as of the
dates and for the periods indicated. The historical financial data for each of
the years ended December 31, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997 are derived from the
audited financial statements of the Company and the Company's predecessor
companies, F&G Ltd. and HAM Marine (collectively, the "Predecessors"). The
historical financial data for the year ended December 31, 1993 are derived
from unaudited financial statements of the Predecessors. The following data
should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the historical financial
statements of the Company and the related notes thereto.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue.......................... $10,355 $23,891 $19,865 $21,759 $113,172
Cost of revenue.................. 6,770 18,063 13,510 15,769 75,236
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Gross profit................... 3,585 5,828 6,355 5,990 37,936
Selling, general and
administrative expenses......... 1,699 2,203 3,862 6,673 12,097
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Operating income (loss)........ 1,886 3,625 2,494 (684) 25,839
Net interest income (expense).... (135) (346) (197) (448) 673
Gain on asset sales.............. 11 808 1,869 349 3,922
Litigation settlement............ -- -- 750 3,467 611
Other............................ 55 23 6 104 165
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Income before provision for
income taxes.................. 1,817 4,110 4,921 2,788 31,210
Provision for income taxes..... -- -- -- -- 7,941
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Net income....................... $ 1,817 $ 4,110 $ 4,921 $ 2,788 $ 23,269
======= ======= ======= ======= ========
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA DATA:
Net income as reported above..... $ 1,817 $ 4,110 $ 4,921 $ 2,788 $ 23,269
Pro forma provision for income
taxes(1)........................ (672) (1,521) (1,821) (1,032) (3,980)
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Pro forma net income........... $ 1,145 $ 2,589 $ 3,100 $ 1,756 $ 19,289
======= ======= ======= ======= ========
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic............................ $ 0.10 $ 0.22 $ 0.27 $ 0.15 $ 1.10
Diluted.......................... $ 0.10 $ 0.22 $ 0.27 $ 0.15 $ 1.09
PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER COMMON
SHARE:
Basic............................ $ 0.06 $ 0.14 $ 0.17 $ 0.10 $ 0.92
Diluted.......................... $ 0.06 $ 0.14 $ 0.17 $ 0.10 $ 0.91
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING:
Basic............................ 18,400 18,400 18,400 18,400 21,065
Diluted.......................... 18,400 18,400 18,400 18,400 21,297
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DATA:
Cash provided by operating
activities...................... $ 3,062 $ 3,094 $ 269 $ 4,875 $ 52,122
Cash provided by (used in)
investing activities............ (1,143) 410 (2,410) (3,866) (26,541)
Cash provided by (used in)
financing....................... (1,704) (3,123) 2,581 (706) 29,947
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
Depreciation and amortization.... $ 339 $ 347 $ 425 $ 696 $ 1,609
Capital expenditures............. 1,167 1,150 2,670 2,357 26,595
EBITDA(2)........................ 2,225 4,054 2,919 1,092 28,464
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital.................. $ 88 $ 2,370 $ 2,714 $ 1,104 $ 45,522
Net property, plant and equip-
ment............................ 2,952 3,582 4,079 5,546 11,817
Total assets..................... 7,069 8,584 14,980 27,582 142,555
Long-term debt................... 3,252 3,217 3,270 2,853 25,767
Stockholders' equity............. 1,980 2,681 5,255 6,219 63,805
19
- --------
(1) The pro forma provision for income taxes gives pro forma effect to the
application of federal and state income taxes to the Company as if it had
been a C Corporation for tax purposes for all periods presented. Prior to
June 1997, the Company and the Predecessors operated as S Corporations for
federal and state income tax purposes. In June 1997, the stockholders of
the Company and the Predecessors made elections terminating the S
Corporation status of the Company and the Predecessors. As a result, the
Company became subject to corporate level income taxation following the
termination of such elections.
(2) EBITDA represents operating income plus depreciation, amortization and
non-cash compensation expense related to the issuance of stock and stock
options to employees. EBITDA is not a measure of cash flow, operating
results or liquidity as determined by generally accepted accounting
principles. The Company has included information concerning EBITDA as
supplemental disclosure because management believes that EBITDA is
commonly accepted as providing useful information regarding a company's
historical ability to incur and service debt. Management of the Company
believes that factors which should be considered by investors in
evaluating EBITDA include, but are not limited to, trends in EBITDA as
compared to cash flow from operations, debt service requirements, and
capital expenditures. Management of the Company believes that the trends
depicted by the Company's historical EBITDA reflect historical
fluctuations in the Company's business and the recent increase in the
level of the Company's activities. EBITDA as defined and measured by the
Company may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies. Further EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as an
alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or cash flow provided
by operations as determined in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles as an indicator of the Company's profitability or
liquidity.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The Company's results of operations are affected primarily by conditions
affecting offshore drilling contractors, including the level of offshore
drilling activity by oil and gas companies. The level of offshore drilling
activity is affected by a number of factors, including prevailing and expected
oil and natural gas prices, the cost of exploring for, producing and
delivering oil and gas, the sale and expiration dates of offshore leases in
the United States and overseas, the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves
in offshore areas, local and international political and economic conditions
and the ability of oil and gas companies to access or generate capital
sufficient to fund capital expenditures for offshore, exploration, development
and production activities. Despite recent declines in oil prices, oil and gas
price levels have generally improved over the past five years resulting in
increased drilling activity in the Gulf of Mexico. This increase in drilling
activity is also attributable to a number of recent industry trends, including
three-dimensional seismic mapping, directional drilling and other advances in
technology that have increased drilling success rates and efficiency and have
led to the discoveries of oil and gas in subsalt geological formations (which
generally are located in depths of 300 to 800 feet of water) and deepwater
areas of the Gulf of Mexico. In the deepwater areas where larger and more
technically advanced drilling rigs are needed, increased drilling activity has
increased demand for retrofitting offshore drilling rigs and improved pricing
levels for such services. In addition, increased drilling activity in and
around more mature fields in shallower waters has contributed to the increase
in demand for conversion, retrofit and repair services for jackups and other
offshore drilling rigs.
The acquisition of the Marystown Facilities and the BLM Companies in early
1998 together with the anticipated completion of the Greenwood Island Facility
later in 1998 and the related increase in workforce will cause a significant
increase in the Company's costs due to increased labor, lease rental and
depreciation and amortization expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expense and interest expense are also expected to increase as a result of
these business growth activities. Management expects the increase in such
costs will directly correlate to anticipated increases in revenue from
increased construction, conversion, retrofit and repair activity. If such
activity does not increase to the extent management anticipates, the Company's
gross profits, operating income and net income could be adversely impacted by
such increased costs.
20
At December 31, 1997, the Company had paid approximately $3.7 million
consisting primarily of advance payments for the manufacture of certain jackup
rig components in anticipation of the Company's being awarded a contract to
build one or more new jackup rigs. Of the $3.7 million of advance payments,
approximately $2.0 million is to a French holding company that was acquired by
the Company subsequent to December 31, 1997. The remaining advance payments
are to an unrelated French company to which the Company has total commitments
of approximately $11.0 million related to the jackup rig components. As of
February 11, 1998, the Company has not been awarded a contract for the
construction of a new jackup rig, however, management of the Company believes
that the Company will be awarded contracts that will utilize the components.
As noted above, the Company has experienced rapid growth during 1997.
Contract revenues increased from $21.8 million in 1996 to $113.2 million in
1997; construction was begun on the Greenwood Island Facility; the United
States Maritime Administration ("MARAD") financing arrangement was
consummated; an initial public offering of common stock was completed and the
Company's backlog increased significantly. Also, unlike prior operations, the
Company has incurred costs related to construction or fabrication of rig
components for which no specific customer has committed. In addition, in early
1998, the Company completed the acquisition of the Marystown Facilities and
the BLM Companies. These changes in and significant expansion of the Company's
operation, expose the Company to additional business and operating risks and
uncertainties.
For the last several years, substantially all of the Company's Pascagoula
work force was leased to the Company by employee leasing companies serving the
Company exclusively. All employee leasing arrangements were terminated as of
May 18, 1997, and the Company now directly employs its employees at levels of
wages and benefits substantially equivalent to those formerly provided by the
employee leasing companies. Management of the Company believes that the costs
of directly employing its laborers will be essentially the same as the
historic cost of the employee leasing arrangement most recently terminated. In
connection with the termination of employee leasing arrangements, the Company
restructured its workmen's compensation insurance arrangements and utilizes a
different carrier from that used by the employee leasing companies. Management
of the Company believes that the change in workmen's compensation insurance
arrangements and carriers has not resulted in costs which are significantly
different than those which would have been incurred under the previous
arrangements.
The Company's operations are subject to variations from quarter to quarter
and year to year resulting from fluctuations in demand for the Company's
services and, due to the large amounts of revenue that are typically derived
from a small quantity of projects, the timing of the receipt of awards for new
projects. In addition, the Company schedules projects based on the timing of
available capacity to perform the services requested and, to the extent that
there are delays in the arrival of a drilling rig or production unit into the
shipyard, the Company generally is not able to utilize the excess capacity
created by such delays. Although the Company may be able to offset the effect
of such delays through adjustments to the size of its skilled labor force on a
temporary basis, such delays may adversely affect the Company's results of
operations in any period in which such delays occur.
The Company's revenue on contracts is earned on the percentage-of-completion
method which is generally based upon the percentage that incurred costs to
date bear to total estimated costs. Accordingly, contract price and cost
estimates are reviewed periodically as the work progresses, and adjustments
proportionate to the percentage of completion are reflected in the accounting
period in which the facts that require such adjustments become known.
Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the
period in which such losses are identified. Other changes, including those
arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, are
recognized in the period in which the revisions are identified. To the extent
that these adjustments result in a reduction or elimination of previously
reported profits, the Company would report such a change by recognizing a
charge against current earnings, which might be significant depending on the
size of the project or the adjustment. Cost of revenue includes costs
associated with the fabrication process and can be further broken down between
direct costs (such as direct labor hours and raw materials) allocated to
specific projects and indirect costs (such as supervisory labor, utilities,
welding supplies and equipment costs) that are associated with production but
are not directly related to a specific project.
21
Prior to June 15, 1997, the Predecessors had operated as S Corporations for
federal and state income tax purposes. As a result, the Predecessors paid no
federal or state income tax, and their earnings were subject to tax directly
at the stockholder level. On June 15, 1997, the stockholders of the Company
and the Predecessors terminated the S Corporation status of such entities. As
a result, the Company and each of the Predecessors became subject to corporate
level income taxation following such termination, and the Company recorded a
net deferred income tax liability through a charge to earnings of
approximately $0.8 million in the second quarter of 1997 attributable
primarily to the difference in financial reporting and tax reporting methods
of accounting for depreciation and sales-type leases.
In the past the Predecessors made distributions to their stockholders in
order to provide a cash return to them and to fund their federal and state
income tax liability that resulted from the S Corporation status of the
Predecessors. In accordance with this practice, one of the Predecessors made
distributions prior to the completion of the Offering. Such amount was based
on the estimated federal and state income taxes payable by the stockholders of
the Predecessors on the aggregate undistributed earnings of the Predecessors
through the date of their election to terminate the S Corporation status of
the Predecessors. In addition, in March 1997, one of the Predecessors made a
distribution to its stockholders of certain nonoperating assets that had a
fair market value of approximately $1.6 million in the aggregate. One of the
Predecessors also distributed to its stockholders (i) cash of approximately
$0.7 million received by such Predecessor in June 1997 in settlement of claims
for unpaid amounts related to a project completed prior to 1997 and (ii)
marketable securities having a fair value of approximately $6.4 million. In
connection with the distribution of marketable securities, such stockholders
assumed the related margin account indebtedness of approximately $2.7 million.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996
During the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company generated revenue of
$113.2 million, an increase of 420%, compared to the $21.8 million generated
in 1996. This increase was caused primarily by an increase in demand for
conversion and retrofit services and a general increase in the size of the
conversion and modification projects in 1997 as compared to 1996.
Cost of revenue was $75.2 million in 1997 compared to $15.8 million in 1996,
resulting in an increase in gross profit from $6.0 million in 1996 to $37.9
million in 1997. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue is
primarily due to the type of work being completed in 1997 compared to 1996.
During 1997, a greater portion of the projects performed consisted of
conversion and retrofit projects, compared to primarily repair and inspection
projects completed in 1996. Conversion and retrofit projects generally provide
higher profit margins than repair and inspection projects. In addition, during
1997, F&G Ltd. completed a major design project for a customer that resulted
in higher gross profits than those earned in 1996.
Selling, general and administrative expense ("SG&A expense") were $12.1
million in 1997 compared to $6.7 million in 1996. The increase in SG&A
expenses reflects an increase in administrative workforce and facilities due
to overall growth of the Company's business and costs associated with being a
publicly held corporation.
Operating income increased by $26.5 million from 1996 to 1997 primarily as a
result of increased revenue and enhanced profit margins discussed in the
preceding paragraphs.
Net interest income (interest income less interest expense) was $0.7 million
in 1997 compared to net interest expense of $0.4 million in 1996. This change
reflects the favorable cash flows of the Company which have provided capital
sufficient to sustain current operations, reducing the need to draw on its
credit facilities. Cash flow was further enhanced by the Company's initial
public offering which provided $46.7 million in cash to the Company.
During 1997, the Company realized gains of approximately $3.6 million as a
result of the distribution of certain appreciated assets not used in the
business to the stockholder of one of the Predecessors. Also, gains of
22
approximately $0.3 million resulted from the sale of real estate held for
investment. The gain on the asset sales in the year ended December 31, 1996
related primarily to the sale of marketable securities.
During 1996, the Company received approximately $3.5 million in proceeds
from the settlement of a lawsuit filed in 1992 related to a contract.
Settlement proceeds of approximately $0.6 million were received in 1997
related to another contract.
The provision for income taxes for 1997 represents income tax expense for
the period subsequent to the termination of the Predecessors' status as S
Corporations, plus a one time charge of approximately $0.8 million
attributable to the initial recording of a net deferred tax liability. The pro
forma provision for income taxes is the result of the application of a
combined federal and state tax rate of 37% to estimated taxable income for the
period prior to termination of S Corporation status.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company generated revenue of
$21.8 million, an increase of 9.5%, compared to the $19.9 million generated in
1995. This increase was caused primarily by an increase in overall demand for
conversion and retrofit.
Cost of revenue was $15.8 million in 1996 compared to $13.5 million in 1995,
resulting in a decline in gross profit from $6.4 million in 1995 to $6.0
million in 1996. This decline is primarily the result of the change in nature
of the contracts performed in each year. In 1995, a much larger portion of
contract revenue was derived from contracts performed under a pooled resources
arrangement between the Company and PMB Engineering, Inc. ("PMB"), a
subsidiary of Bechtel Corporation. Under this arrangement, the Company's cost
of revenue consisted primarily of direct and indirect labor related charges.
Gross profit, as a percentage of revenue, under such arrangements was
generally higher than under contracts performed solely by the Company. For
contracts performed solely by the Company, cost of contract revenue includes
charges related to materials purchased on which the gross profit percentage
realized by the Company is generally lower, resulting in a lower overall gross
profit percentage.
SG&A expenses were $6.7 million in 1996 compared to $3.9 million in 1995.
SG&A expenses for 1996 and 1995 include bonuses of approximately $2.1 million
and $1.2 million, respectively, paid to certain employees who are also
stockholders (the "Stockholder Employees"). Cash compensation paid to the
Stockholder Employees during the year ended December 31, 1996 exceeded the
amount of compensation levels set forth in the employment contracts entered
into between the Company and the Stockholder Employees in May 1997 by
approximately $1.9 million. SG&A expenses for 1996 also include $1.1 million
of compensation expense related to the issuance of stock to an employee of one
of the Predecessors. Excluding such bonuses from both years and the
compensation expense related to the issuance of stock, SG&A expenses increased
by approximately $0.8 million. Such increase is primarily the result of costs
incurred by the Company related to increased business development activities,
including the pursuit of alternatives to increase the Company's shipyard
capacity, the opening of a Houston sales office and an increase in charitable
contributions resulting from a one-time contribution of real property to a
college.
Operating income declined by $3.2 million as a result of a slightly lower
gross profit margin combined with higher SG&A expenses. Excluding the effect
of the increase in bonuses and the issuance of stock discussed above,
operating income declined approximately $1.2 million, reflecting the change in
gross profit margin and the increase in SG&A expenses.
Net interest expense increased to $0.4 million in 1996 from $0.2 million in
1995. Interest expense increased by $0.2 million as a result of increased
borrowings to finance capital expenditures and approximately $2.1 million in
increased brokerage margin account borrowings. Interest income remained
constant at approximately $0.4 million, representing primarily interest on
certificates of deposit pledged against borrowings and interest earned on a
sales-type lease.
23
The gain on the sale of assets in 1996 relates to the disposition of certain
nonoperating assets, primarily land, and, to a lesser degree, the sale of
certain marketable securities. The 1995 gain on sale of assets relates to the
sale, under a sales-type lease, of certain land, buildings and a dock facility
formerly operated by the Company.
During 1996, the Company received approximately $3.5 million in proceeds
from the settlement of a lawsuit filed in 1992 related to a contract. In 1995,
the Company received $0.8 million in settlement proceeds related to a claim
against a general contractor for which the Company had served as contractor.
The pro forma provision for income taxes is the result of the application of
a combined federal and state tax rate of 37% to income before income taxes.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historically, the Company has financed its business activities through funds
generated from operations, a credit facility secured by accounts receivable,
and long-term borrowings secured by assets purchased with proceeds from such
borrowings. Net cash provided by operations was $0.3 million, $4.9 million and
$52.1 million for 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. Net borrowings
(repayments) from all credit arrangements, excluding the MARAD arrangement
discussed below, were $4.8 million, $4.1 million and ($8.7) million for 1995,
1996 and 1997, respectively. The Company retired substantially all of its
outstanding debt subsequent to receipt of the proceeds of its initial public
offering.
During 1997, the Company incurred approximately $26.6 million in capital
expenditures primarily related to the overall expansion of the Company's
business activities. Approximately $19.2 million was expended related to
facilities and related equipment for the new Greenwood Island Facility, $5.1
million related to expansion of existing shipyard facilities and equipment and
$2.3 million related to expanded administrative facilities. These capital
expenditures were funded from operating cash flow and proceeds from the
initial public offering. A portion of the costs incurred related to the
Greenwood Island Facility are expected to be funded from proceeds from the
MARAD arrangement discussed below.
In March 1997, HAM Marine entered into a new credit facility (the "Credit
Facility") which provided for borrowings of up to $10.0 million, subject to a
borrowing base limitation equal to 80% of eligible receivables. The Credit
Facility is secured by contract-related receivables. In connection with
obtaining the Credit Facility, HAM Marine repaid all outstanding indebtedness
under the provisions of the existing credit facility and such facility was
terminated. In November 1997, the borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility
was increased to $20.0 million. At December 31, 1997, there was no outstanding
balance under the Credit Facility and the borrowing base amount was $20.0
million. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest equal to the
lender's prime lending rate plus 1/2% per annum. At December 31, 1997, the
interest rate under the Credit Facility was 8.47% per annum. The Credit
Facility contains a number of restrictions, including a provision which would
prohibit the payment of dividends by HAM Marine to the Company in the event
that HAM Marine defaults under the terms of the facility. In addition, the
Company must maintain certain minimum net worth and working capital levels and
ratios and debt to equity ratios. The Company was not in compliance with one
of the working capital ratio provisions of the Credit Facility debt agreement;
however, the Bank waived the compliance requirement for this working capital
ratio.
As an additional source of borrowing capacity, MARAD has provided its
guarantee for $24.8 million of bonds issued by the Company. The proceeds from
the sale of MARAD guaranteed bonds must be used only for capital expenditures
relating to the costs of constructing and equipping the Company's new
Greenwood Island Facility. In November 1997, $24.8 million of proceeds from
the MARAD arrangement were placed in escrow for use by the Company upon
completion of documentation that qualifying expenditures had been made. As of
December 31, 1997, the Company had incurred expenditures of approximately
$14.4 million which are eligible for reimbursement from the escrowed funds.
24
In July 1997, the Company completed an initial public offering (the
"Offering") of 6,005,042 shares of its common stock for net proceeds of
approximately $46.7 million. As of September 30, 1997 the Company had utilized
approximately $14 million of such net proceeds. The Company used approximately
$25 million of such net proceeds to acquire the BLM Companies. The Company
used the remaining $7.7 million in January of 1998 to purchase its floating
drydock and for general corporate purposes. The Company would expect to fund
the remaining portion of its anticipated capital requirements from cash flow
from operations, the MARAD financing, borrowings available under the Credit
Facility or additional borrowings. Pending the Company's use of the net
proceeds of the Offering, the Company repaid borrowings under its existing
revolving credit facility and invested the remaining net proceeds from the
Offering in short-term, investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments.
Management believes that the cash generated by operating activities, and
funds available under the Credit Facility and the MARAD financing will be
sufficient to fund the construction of the new shipyard, its other capital
expenditure requirements, and its working capital needs at current levels of
activity; however, additional debt financing or equity financing may be
required in the future if the Company increases its conversion, retrofit and
repair business or obtains orders to construct new drilling rigs or production
units. Although the Company believes that, under such circumstances, it would
be able to obtain additional financing, there can be no assurance that any
additional debt or equity financing will be available to the Company for these
purposes or, if available, will be available on terms satisfactory to the
Company.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
In connection with the rapid expansion of the Company's business activities,
the Company is reassessing the computer and information system needs of the
overall organization. Along with this reassessment, the Company is also
reviewing its computer-based systems and applications to ensure that its
computer and information systems will function properly at Year 2000. At this
time, management of the Company believes that the specific costs of achieving
Year 2000 compliance for its current systems will not have a material effect
on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("SFAS No. 128"),
"Earnings Per Share," which adopts a revised methodology for computing
earnings per share for publicly owned companies. The Company adopted the new
methodology in the fourth quarter of 1997. The adoption of SFAS No. 128 did
not change the Company's previously reported historical earnings per share.
In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 130 ("SFAS No. 130"), "Reporting Comprehensive Income," which is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. SFAS No. 130 will require
the company to (a) classify items of other comprehensive income by their
nature in a financial statement and (b) display the accumulated balance of
other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional
paid in capital.
In June 1997, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 131 ("SFAS No. 131"), "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information," which is effective for periods beginning after December
15, 1997. SFAS No. 131 will require the Company to report financial and
descriptive information about its operating segments.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required by this Item 8 is contained in a separate section
of this report. See "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page F-1.
25
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
In March 1997, the Company's Board of Directors engaged Arthur Andersen LLP,
independent public accountants (i) to audit the balance sheet of the Company
as of April 21, 1997, and the financial statements of the Predecessors as of
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and for each of the three years ended December 31,
1996 and (ii) to serve as the Company's auditors going forward. Breazeale,
Saunders & O'Neil, Ltd. of Jackson, Mississippi had previously served as
independent public accountants for HAM Marine, the Company's principal
predecessor. There were no disagreements with Breazeale, Saunders & O'Neil,
Ltd. on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure or auditing scope or procedure at the time of the engagement of
Arthur Andersen LLP or with respect to the financial statements of HAM Marine
as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996. Prior to retaining Arthur
Andersen LLP, the Company had not consulted with Arthur Andersen LLP regarding
accounting principles.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the
Company's definitive Proxy Statement (the "Proxy Statement") to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, within 120 days after the end of
the fiscal year covered by this report. See also "Executive Officers of the
Registrant" included in Part I hereof.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
26
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements listed by the Registrant on the
accompanying Index to Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of
this Annual Report. (See page F-1).
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The required information is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements or Notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
EXHIBIT
-------
*3.1 --Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18,
1997).
3.2 --Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation.
*3.3 --Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*4.1 --Specimen Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*4.2 --Form of Registration Rights Agreement among Friede Goldman
International Inc., J. L. Holloway, Carl M. Crawford, Ronald W.
Schnoor, James A. Lowe, III and John F. Alford. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18,
1997).
*4.3 --Form of Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement among
Friede Goldman International Inc., J. L. Holloway, Carl M. Crawford,
Ronald W. Schnoor, James A. Lowe, III, John F. Alford, Holloway
Partners, L.P., Carl Crawford Children's Trust and Bodin Children's
Trust. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.1 --Form of Officer and Director Indemnification Agreement.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.2 --Form of Employment Agreement between Friede Goldman International
Inc. and J. L. Holloway. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.3 --Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Friede
Goldman International Inc. and J. L. Holloway. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18,
1997).
*10.4 --Form of Employment Agreement between HAM Martine, Inc. and each of
Carl M. Crawford and Ronald W. Schnoor. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.5 --Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between HAM Martine,
Inc. and each of Carl M. Crawford and Ronald W. Schnoor.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.6 --Form of Employment Agreement between Friede Goldman International
Inc. and John F. Alford. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
27
*10.7 --Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Friede
Goldman International Inc. and John F. Alford. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18,
1997).
*10.8 --Form of Employment Agreement between HAM Martine, Inc. and James A.
Lowe, III. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.9 --Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between HAM Martine,
Inc. and James A. Lowe, III. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.10 --Form of Employment Agreement between Friede Goldman International
Inc. and Richard L. Marler. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
10.11 --Employment Agreement of Marshall D. Lynch.
10.12 --Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Incentive Plan.
*10.13 --Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 20, 1997, by and among
HAM Martine, Inc., as borrower, Friede & Goldman, Ltd., J. L. Holloway
and Carl Crawford, as guarantors, and Bank One, Louisiana, National
Association, as the Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.14 --Amended Lease Agreement, dated June 22, 1995, by and among the
Jackson County Port Authority, the Board of Supervisors of Jackson
County, Mississippi and HAM Martine, Inc. (Pascagoula shipyard).
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.15 --Lease Contract, dated December 12, 1996, by and among the Jackson
County Port Authority, the Board of Supervisors of Jackson County,
Mississippi and HAM Martine, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.16 --Memorandum of Understanding, dated December 30, 1996, by and among
the Board of Supervisors of Jackson County, Mississippi and HAM
Martine, Inc. (New shipyard). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.16 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.17 --Form of Amended and Restated Stock Exchange Agreement by and among
Friede Goldman International Inc., HAM Martine, Inc., Friede & Goldman
Ltd., J. L. Holloway, Carl M. Crawford, Ronald W. Schnoor, James A.
Lowe, III, John F. Alford, Holloway Partners, L.P., Carl Crawford
Children's Trust and Bodin Children's Trust. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July 18,
1997).
*10.18 --Business Purchase Agreement, dated November 22, 1996, by and among J.
L. Holloway Holdings, Inc., Friede & Goldman, Ltd. and Jerome L.
Goldman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599)
declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.19 --Amendment to Business Purchase Agreement, dated December 3, 1996, by
and among Friede & Goldman, Ltd. (f/k/a J. L. Holloway Holdings,
Inc.), J. L. Goldman Associates, Inc. (f/k/a Friede & Goldman, Ltd.)
and Jerome L. Goldman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.20 --Second Amendment to Business Purchase Agreement, dated May 19, 1997,
by and among Friede & Goldman, Ltd., J. L. Goldman Associates, Inc.
and Jerome L. Goldman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
28
*10.21 --Third Amendment to Business Purchase Agreement, dated June 13, 1997,
by and among Friede & Goldman, Ltd., J. L. Goldman Associates, Inc.
and Jerome L. Goldman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-27599) declared effective on July 18, 1997).
*10.22 --Form of Aircraft Dry Lease, dated as of July 1, 1997, by and between
Equipment Management Systems, LLC and HAM Martine, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-27599) declared effective on July
18, 1997).
*10.23 --Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 1, 1998, by and among
Marystown Shipyard Limited, Newfoundland Ocean Enterprises Ltd.,
Friede Goldman Canada Inc., Friede Goldman International Inc. and
Friede Goldman Marystown Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 1,
1998).
*10.24 --Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated February 5, 1998, by and among
Friede Goldman France S.A.S., Mr. Jean-Francois Queru, Mr. Arnaud
Queru, Ms. Helene Queru, Mrs. Regine Queru, Mr. Jean-Michel
Gandreuil, Mrs. Dominique Gandreuil and MGLV. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-
K, dated February 5, 1998).
*10.25 --Amendment No. 1 to Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated February 5,
1998, by and among Friede Goldman France S.A.S., Friede Goldman
International Inc., Mr. Jean-Francois Queru, Mr. Arnaud Queru, Ms.
Helene Queru, Mrs. Regine Queru, Mr. Jean-Michel Gandreuil, Mrs.
Dominique Gandreuil and MGLV. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 5,
1998).
21.1 --Subsidiaries of Friede Goldman International Inc.
27.1 --Financial Data Schedule.
- --------
* Previously filed.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
During the quarter ended December 31, 1997, the Company did not file any
Current Reports on Form 8-K. However, the Company filed a Current Report of
Form 8-K, dated as of January 1, 1998, and an amendment to such report on Form
8-K/A on March 17, 1998. Additionally, the Company filed a Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated as of February 5, 1998.
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 30, 1998.
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
/s/ J. L. Holloway
_____________________________________
J. L. Holloway
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 30, 1998.
SIGNATURE TITLE
/s/ J. L. Holloway Chairman of the Board,
- ----------------------------------- President and Chief
J. L. Holloway Executive Officer
(Principal Executive
Officer)
/s/ Marshall D. Lynch Chief Financial Officer
- ----------------------------------- (Principal Financial
Marshall D. Lynch Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
/s/ Alan A. Baker Director
- -----------------------------------
Alan A. Baker
/s/ T. Jay Collins Director
- -----------------------------------
T. Jay Collins
/s/ John G. Corlew Director
- -----------------------------------
John G. Corlew
/s/ Jerome L. Goldman Director
- -----------------------------------
Jerome L. Goldman
/s/Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. Director
- -----------------------------------
Raymond E Mabus, Jr.
/s/ Howell W. Todd Director
- -----------------------------------
Howell W. Todd
30
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
----
Consolidated Financial Statements of Friede Goldman International Inc. and
Subsidiaries:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................................. F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1997.............. F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,
1995, 1996 and 1997...................................................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997......................................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
1995, 1996 and 1997...................................................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................ F-7
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Friede Goldman International Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Friede
Goldman International Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Friede
Goldman International Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1997, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Jackson, Mississippi,
February 11, 1998.
F-2
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (NOTE 1)
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
ASSETS 1996 1997
------ ----------- ------------
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................... $ 1,509,876 $ 57,038,036
Restricted certificates of deposit.................. 4,651,964 --
Marketable securities, at fair market value......... 6,618,766 --
Accounts receivable:
Trade............................................. 4,318,999 20,564,525
Other............................................. 550,577 3,669
Inventory and stockpiled materials.................. 577,904 5,216,651
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
on uncompleted contracts........................... 284,052 --
Restricted escrowed funds........................... -- 14,383,929
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........... 1,102,192 607,448
----------- ------------
Total current assets.............................. 19,614,330 97,814,258
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated de-
preciation........................................... 5,546,399 11,816,664
Construction in progress.............................. -- 17,934,877
Restricted escrowed funds............................. -- 10,433,071
Intangibles and other assets.......................... 2,421,326 4,556,542
----------- ------------
Total assets...................................... $27,582,055 $142,555,412
=========== ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-
term debt.......................................... $10,235,349 $ 493,829
Advance from stockholder............................ 1,400,000 --
Accounts payable, trade............................. 3,075,216 11,507,108
Accrued expenses.................................... 537,786 3,803,587
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
on uncompleted contracts........................... 3,262,168 36,487,735
----------- ------------
Total current liabilities......................... 18,510,519 52,292,259
Long-term debt, less current maturities............... 2,852,649 25,766,929
Deferred income tax liability......................... -- 691,000
----------- ------------
Total liabilities................................. 21,363,168 78,750,188
----------- ------------
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized, none outstanding....................... -- --
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares
authorized, 18,400,000 shares and 24,405,042 issued
and outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 1997...... 184,000 244,050
Additional paid-in capital.......................... 1,877,567 49,501,707
Retained earnings................................... 2,548,649 14,059,467
Unrealized gain on marketable securities............ 1,608,671 --
----------- ------------
Total stockholders' equity........................ 6,218,887 63,805,224
----------- ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........ $27,582,055 $142,555,412
=========== ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (NOTE 1)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ------------
Revenue................................ $19,864,895 $21,758,715 $113,171,533
Cost of revenue........................ 13,509,781 15,768,980 75,235,691
----------- ----------- ------------
Gross profit......................... 6,355,114 5,989,735 37,935,842
Selling, general and administrative
expenses.............................. 3,861,564 6,673,371 12,096,614
----------- ----------- ------------
Operating income (loss).............. 2,493,550 (683,636) 25,839,228
----------- ----------- ------------
Other income (expense):
Interest expense..................... (650,171) (891,458) (563,601)
Interest income...................... 452,882 443,317 1,236,152
Gain on sale or distribution of
assets.............................. 1,868,885 348,793 3,922,099
Litigation settlement................ 750,000 3,466,635 611,310
Other................................ 5,760 104,487 165,217
----------- ----------- ------------
Total other income................. 2,427,356 3,471,774 5,371,177
----------- ----------- ------------
Income before provision for income
taxes............................... 4,920,906 2,788,138 31,210,405
Provision for income taxes......... -- -- 7,940,920
----------- ----------- ------------
Net Income........................... $ 4,920,906 $ 2,788,138 $ 23,269,485
=========== =========== ============
Pro forma data (Note 5):
Net income, reported above........... $ 4,920,906 $ 2,788,138 $ 23,269,485
Pro forma provision for income taxes
related to operations
as S Corporation.................... 1,821,000 1,032,000 3,980,000
----------- ----------- ------------
Pro forma net income................. $ 3,099,906 $ 1,756,138 $ 19,289,485
=========== =========== ============
Earnings per common share (Note 5):
Basic................................ $ 0.27 $ 0.15 $ 1.10
Diluted.............................. $ 0.27 $ 0.15 $ 1.09
Pro forma earnings per common share:
Basic................................ $ 0.17 $ 0.10 $ 0.92
Diluted.............................. $ 0.17 $ 0.10 $ 0.91
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
Basic................................ 18,400,000 18,400,000 21,065,252
Diluted.............................. 18,400,000 18,400,000 21,297,006
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (NOTE 1)
UNREALIZED
GAIN
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL (LOSS) ON TOTAL
------------------- PAID-IN RETAINED MARKETABLE STOCKHOLDERS'
NUMBER AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS SECURITIES EQUITY
---------- -------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -------------
Balance, December 31,
1994................... 501 $ 5,013 $ 876,554 $ 1,837,155 $ (37,467) $ 2,681,255
Distributions to
stockholders......... -- -- -- (2,226,137) -- (2,226,137)
Unrealized loss on
marketable
securities........... -- -- -- -- (120,776) (120,776)
Net income............ -- -- -- 4,920,906 -- 4,920,906
---------- -------- ----------- ------------ --------- ------------
Balance, December 31,
1995................... 501 5,013 876,554 4,531,924 (158,243) 5,255,248
Distribution to
stockholders......... -- -- -- (4,771,413) -- (4,771,413)
Capital contribution
from stockholders.... -- -- 100,000 -- -- 100,000
Stock granted to
employees as
compensation......... -- -- 1,080,000 -- -- 1,080,000
Unrealized gain on
marketable
securities........... -- -- -- -- 1,766,914 1,766,914
Net income............ -- -- -- 2,788,138 -- 2,788,138
---------- -------- ----------- ------------ --------- ------------
Balance, December 31,
1996................... 501 5,013 2,056,554 2,548,649 1,608,671 6,218,887
Stock granted to
employees as
compensation......... -- -- 475,000 -- -- 475,000
Unrealized loss on
marketable
securities........... -- -- -- -- (704,060) (704,060)
Distributions to
stockholders......... -- -- -- (11,758,667) (904,611) (12,663,278)
Exchange of stock in
connection with
reorganization (Note
1)................... 9,199,499 86,987 (86,987) -- -- --
Sale of stock in
public offering, net
of offering costs.... 3,002,521 30,025 46,637,560 -- -- 46,667,585
Stock options granted. -- -- 541,605 -- -- 541,605
Stock split........... 12,202,521 122,025 (122,025) -- -- --
Net income............ -- -- -- 23,269,485 -- 23,269,485
---------- -------- ----------- ------------ --------- ------------
Balance, December 31,
1997................... 24,405,042 $244,050 $49,501,707 $ 14,059,467 $ -- $ 63,805,224
========== ======== =========== ============ ========= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (NOTE 1)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income............................ $ 4,920,906 $ 2,788,138 $ 23,269,485
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization......... 425,445 695,551 1,608,531
Compensation expense related to stock
or stock options granted to
employees............................ -- 1,080,000 1,016,605
Gain on sale of assets................ (1,868,885) (348,793) (3,922,099)
Net increase in billings related to
costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts................ 856,622 2,978,116 33,509,619
Deferred income tax provision......... -- -- 683,000
Other................................. (21,119) -- --
Net effect of changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
Restricted certificates of deposit... (3,451,327) (195,697) 4,651,964
Accounts receivable.................. (402,360) (3,834,519) (15,698,618)
Inventory and stockpiled materials... -- (571,000) (4,638,747)
Prepaid expenses and other assets.... 41,338 (464,966) (55,228)
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses............................ (231,444) 2,747,893 11,697,693
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by operating
activities......................... 269,176 4,874,723 52,122,205
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures for plant and
equipment and construction in
progress............................. (2,669,855) (2,356,999) (26,595,481)
Cash received upon acquisition of
Friede & Goldman..................... -- 163,020 --
Proceeds from sale of property, plant
and equipment........................ 1,431,770 578,521 423,913
Payments on notes receivable.......... 317,733 381,352 538,523
Release of (investment in) long-term
restricted cash...................... 569,731 -- --
Investment in marketable securities... (2,058,910) (2,631,756) --
Increase in other assets.............. -- -- (907,791)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash used in investing
activities......................... $(2,409,531) $(3,865,862) $(26,540,836)
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock offering.......... $ -- $ -- $ 46,667,585
Net borrowings (repayments) under
lines of credit...................... 3,924,059 3,822,030 (1,501,000)
Proceeds from borrowings under debt
facilities........................... 6,188,196 1,736,109 700,847
Repayments on borrowings under debt
facilities........................... (5,304,775) (1,492,917) (7,897,979)
Distributions to shareholders......... (2,226,137) (4,771,413) (6,672,682)
Payment of financing charges for Title
XI debt.............................. -- -- (1,349,980)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities.................. 2,581,343 (706,191) 29,946,791
----------- ----------- ------------
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents........................... 440,988 302,670 55,528,160
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of year............................... 766,218 1,207,206 1,509,876
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
year.................................. $ 1,207,206 $ 1,509,876 $ 57,038,036
=========== =========== ============
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow
information:
Cash paid during the period for
interest............................. $ 621,387 $ 751,522 $ 1,255,792
=========== =========== ============
Cash paid during the period for income
taxes................................ $ -- $ -- $ 4,750,000
=========== =========== ============
Issuance of common stock or options as
compensation......................... $ -- $ 1,080,000 $ 1,017,000
=========== =========== ============
Non-cash distributions of property to
stockholders......................... $ -- $ -- $ 1,641,000
=========== =========== ============
Assumption of note payable by
stockholder.......................... $ -- $ -- $ 198,000
=========== =========== ============
Proceeds from borrowings under Title
XI held in escrow.................... $ -- $ -- $ 24,817,000
=========== =========== ============
Distribution of marketable securities
to stockholder to satisfy note
payable.............................. $ -- $ -- $ 1,400,000
=========== =========== ============
Distribution of marketable securities
to stockholder....................... $ -- $ -- $ 6,391,000
=========== =========== ============
Assumption of margin account debt by
stockholders......................... $ -- $ -- $ 2,749,000
=========== =========== ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS:
The principal predecessor to Friede Goldman International Inc. (the
"Company"), HAM Marine, Inc. ("HAM"), was formed in 1982 under the laws of the
State of Mississippi. HAM continues to operate as a subsidiary of the Company.
HAM's primary business is to provide conversion, retrofit and repair services
for offshore drilling rigs. HAM's primary customers are offshore drilling
contractors who utilize the Company's services in connection with the
conversion and modification of existing drilling rigs in order to increase
their technical capabilities or to improve their efficiency. As of December
31, 1997, substantially all of HAM's services were conducted at a deepwater
dock facility on land leased from the Port Authority in Pascagoula,
Mississippi (the "Port Authority").
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. These consolidated statements
include the accounts of HAM for all periods presented, Friede & Goldman, Ltd.
for all periods subsequent to December 2, 1996 and all other subsidiaries from
their dates of incorporation.
Acquisition of Friede & Goldman, Ltd.
On December 2, 1996, a company related to HAM through identical equity
ownership, J.L. Holloway Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), purchased certain assets
and rights, including the rights to the trade name "Friede & Goldman" from an
unrelated third party ("Mr. Goldman"). Simultaneously with the closing of the
purchase, Holdings changed its name to Friede & Goldman, Ltd. ("Friede &
Goldman"). Prior to Holdings' purchase of assets and rights, Holdings had no
material assets, liabilities or operations. These transactions are accounted
for under the purchase method of accounting by the Company in the accompanying
financial statements. The operations of Friede & Goldman for the period from
December 2, 1996 to December 31, 1996, which were immaterial, are included in
the accompanying financial statements. For the eleven months ended November
30, 1996, revenues, gross profit and net income generated by the purchased
assets were $3.7 million, $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Assets acquired included property and equipment with a value of
approximately $216,000, and designs and patents which, at December 2, 1996,
were allocated a carrying value of approximately $1,246,000.
In addition to the cash consideration paid by Friede & Goldman to Mr.
Goldman, the Purchase Agreement requires Friede & Goldman, until December
2006, to pay Mr. Goldman certain licensing and design fees received by Friede
& Goldman from the designs of new-build independent leg jackups and
semisubmersible drilling rigs as well as a fee collected from sales of a
patented rack chock system, a system which improves the strength of the
connection between the legs and the hull of a jackup drilling rig. The Company
may also be required to make payments to Mr. Goldman of up to $1.0 million for
each three year period in which the Company does meet certain market share
targets (the "Market Share Payment") for the sale of designs for new-build
independent leg jackup and semisubmersible drilling rigs. If the Company fails
to make any of the payments described on a timely basis, the seller has the
right to require that all of the assets purchased (other than the name "Friede
Goldman" and derivatives thereof and excluding new designs developed by the
Company after the acquisition) be returned and the right to terminate the
consulting and non-compete provisions of the Purchase Agreement. The payments
to Mr. Goldman by the Company attributable to license and design fees or sales
will be charged to costs of revenue in connection with the related contracts.
Any amounts paid by the Company to Mr. Goldman attributable to the Market
Share Payment will be charged to expense in the period in which it becomes
known that such a payment will be required.
Friede & Goldman's primary business is the design of offshore drilling and
production units, including jackups, semisubmersibles, drillships and floating
production, storage and offloading vessels, for new
F-7
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
construction and with respect to upgrade and modification projects. Friede &
Goldman's offices are located in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Mr. Goldman was also elected to the Board of Directors of the Company.
Reorganization and Initial Public Offering
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in
February 1997. In anticipation of the Company's initial public offering of its
common stock, the stockholders of HAM and Friede & Goldman contributed all of
their ownership in HAM and Friede & Goldman to the Company in exchange for
shares of common stock in the Company; and HAM and Friede & Goldman became
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (the "Reorganization"). Because HAM
and Friede & Goldman were owned in substantially identical proportions, the
number of shares of common stock of the Company received by each of the
stockholders of HAM and Friede & Goldman in the Reorganization was based on
each stockholder's percentage of ownership of HAM shares. The Reorganization
was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control.
Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements include the accounts of HAM
for all dates and periods presented and of Friede & Goldman for the period
since December 2, 1996. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated. References to the "Company" included herein include HAM
and Friede & Goldman, which are also sometimes collectively referred to as the
"Predecessors."
The Company's certificate of incorporation established authority to issue
1,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock and 2,000 shares of $0.01 par
value common stock. Preferred stock may be issued in one or more series and in
such amounts as may be determined by the Company's board of directors. The
voting powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional
or other special rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions, if any, of each preferred stock issue shall be fixed by
resolution of the board of directors providing for the issue. All shares of
common stock of the Company shall be identical, and, except as otherwise
provided in a resolution of the board of directors with respect to preferred
stock, the holders of common stock shall exclusively possess all voting power
with each share of common stock having one vote.
In May 1997, in conjunction with the Company's initial public offering of
its common stock, the Company authorized an increase in the amount of
authorized shares to 5,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock and
25,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value common stock. Effective prior to the
public offering, the Company issued, pursuant to a stock exchange agreement,
18,400,000 shares (as adjusted for the 2-for-1 stock split discussed below) of
the Company's common stock to the stockholders of HAM and Friede & Goldman as
described above. Therefore, for the historical per share and pro forma per
share data included in the statements of operations, the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding includes 18,400,000 shares for all periods
presented.
In July 1997, the Company completed an initial public offering of 6,005,042
shares (as adjusted for the 2-for-1 stock split discussed below) of its common
stock and received net proceeds of approximately $46.6 million. The Company
has utilized a portion of the proceeds to fund working capital needs and the
expansion of its facilities and equipment. The Company expects to utilize the
remainder of the proceeds during 1998 to fund additional capital expenditures
and strategic acquisitions (See Note 15). Pending the Company's use of the net
proceeds of the offering, the Company repaid borrowings under its existing
credit facility and invested the remaining proceeds in short-term interest
bearing instruments.
Stock Split and Increase in Authorized Shares
In September 1997, the Company declared a 2-for-1 stock split, effective
October 16, 1997 for all stockholders of record as of October 1, 1997. Unless
otherwise indicated, all references to number of shares and
F-8
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
to per share information in the financial statements and notes have been
adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
In January 1998, in connection with a special meeting of the stockholders of
the Company, the number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company
was increased to 125,000,000 shares.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Revenue Recognition
The Company records revenue on contracts on the percentage-of-completion
method. Contract revenue is earned based upon the percentage that incurred
costs to date, excluding the costs of any purchased but uninstalled materials,
bear to total estimated costs, commencing when progress reaches a point where
experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy.
As contracts extend over one or more years, revisions in costs and earnings
estimates during the course of the work are reflected in the accounting period
in which the facts which require the revisions become known. Provisions for
estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such
losses are first identified. Other changes, including those arising from
contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements are recognized in
the period in which the revisions are determined.
Costs of revenues include all direct material and labor costs and those
indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor,
supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs. Selling, general and
administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Cash Equivalents and Restricted Certificates of Deposit
The Company considers all short-term cash investments with an original
maturity of less than three months to be cash equivalents. The restricted
certificates of deposit were held by financial institutions as collateral on
debt facilities and were, therefore, not considered cash equivalents.
Inventories and Stockpiled Materials
Inventories and stockpiled materials include materials purchased for
specific contracts which have not been installed as of December 31, 1996 and
1997, and are stated at the lower of specifically identified cost or market
(replacement cost or net realizable value). At December 31, 1997, the Company
had paid approximately $3.7 million consisting primarily of advance payments
for the manufacture of certain jackup rig components in anticipation of the
Company's being awarded a contract to build one or more new jackup rigs. Such
amount is included in inventory and stockpiled materials in the December 31,
1997 balance sheet. Of the $3.7 million of advance payments, approximately
$2.0 million is to a French company that was subsequently acquired by the
Company (See Note 15). The remaining advance payments are to an unrelated
French company to which the Company has total commitments of approximately
$11.0 million related to the jackup rig components. As of February 11, 1998,
the Company has not been awarded a contract for the construction of a new
jackup rig, however, management of the Company believes that the Company will
be awarded contracts that will utilize the components.
Construction in Progress and Restricted Funds Held in Escrow
In January 1997, the Company announced plans to build an additional shipyard
at a location approximately six miles from the Company's existing shipyard in
Pascagoula, Mississippi, that will have unobstructed deep water access to the
Gulf of Mexico (the "Greenwood Island Facility"). The Greenwood Island
Facility will be located on real estate leased from the Port Authority, and is
expected to be completed in 1998 at an estimated
F-9
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
total cost to construct and equip the facility of approximately $50 million.
In connection with the construction of the new shipyard, the County of
Jackson, Mississippi, agreed to dredge the ship channel and build roads and
other infrastructure related to the new shipyard, at a total cost to the
county of approximately $6 million, under an economic incentive program. The
Company also secured financing pursuant to an agreement dated December 2, 1997
from the United States Maritime Administration ("MARAD") for Title XI debt
financing which will provide up to $24.8 million of the funds needed for
completion of the new shipyard. The financing agreement requires the Company
to fund the first 12.5% of qualifying construction expenses with MARAD
financing the remaining 87.5% of qualifying construction expenses. Proceeds
from the financing are currently being held in escrow and will be released as
proof of qualifying expenses are approved by MARAD. As of December 31, 1997,
the Company had incurred approximately $14.4 million in construction of the
Greenwood Island Facility that qualified for reimbursement from the escrowed
proceeds of the MARAD financing arrangement. Such funds were released from
escrow in January 1998, and, accordingly, $14.4 million of the escrowed funds
are included as a current asset in the December 31, 1997 balance sheet. The
Company has capitalized interest of approximately $103,000 during the year
ended December 31, 1997 incurred on borrowings related to construction of the
Greenwood Island Facility.
Intangibles and Other Assets
Intangible assets of $1.2 million and $1.1 million at December 31, 1996 and
1997, respectively, consist of design and patents acquired in connection with
the acquisition of Friede & Goldman that are being amortized over a 10 year
period. Amortization expense was $134,000 for the year ended December 31,
1997. For the period from December 2, 1996 to December 31, 1996, amortization
expense was immaterial.
Other assets at December 31, 1997 include $1.3 million of deferred financing
costs associated with the Title XI debt discussed above. These costs will be
amortized over the 15 year repayment term of the debt.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Subsequent to the termination of the Predecessor's status as S Corporations
for income tax purposes (See Note 5), the Company has followed the asset and
liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes prescribed by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 ("SFAS No. 109"),
"Accounting for Income Taxes."
Use of Estimates
These financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Such preparation requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the
dates of the balance sheets and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
for the years presented. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates. Areas requiring significant estimates to be made by management
include the application of the percentage-of-completion accounting method,
depreciation and amortization, provision for income taxes, and accruals for
certain estimated liabilities.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of the Company's financial instruments at December 31,
1996 and 1997, including cash, restricted certificates of deposit, marketable
securities, accounts receivable, investment in sales-type lease, accounts
payable and long-term debt, approximates fair value.
F-10
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Earnings Per Common Share
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," which simplifies the computation of
earnings per share ("EPS"). SFAS No. 128 is effective for financial statements
issued for periods ending after December 15, 1997, and requires restatement of
all prior period EPS data presented. Under SFAS No. 128, the Company computes
two earnings per share amounts-- basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is
calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for the periods presented. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the periods,
including dilutive potential common shares which reflect the dilutive effect
of the Company's stock options. The retroactive adoption of SFAS No. 128 did
not result in any change in previously reported historical earnings per share
for any year prior to 1997. Dilutive common equivalent shares for the year
ended December 31, 1997 were 231,754, all attributable to stock options. There
were no common equivalent shares outstanding during 1996 and 1995.
Certain Risks and Uncertainties
The Company has experienced rapid growth during 1997. Contract revenues
increased from $21.8 million in 1996 to $113.2 million in 1997; construction
was begun on the Greenwood Island Facility; the MARAD financing arrangement
was consummated; an initial public offering of common stock was completed; and
the Company's backlog increased significantly. Also, unlike prior operations,
the Company incurred costs related to construction or fabrication of rigs or
components for which no specific customers have committed. In addition, in
early 1998, the Company has completed the acquisition of foreign entities, in
Canada and France (See Note 15). These changes in and significant expansion of
the Company's operations expose the Company to additional business and
operating risks and uncertainties.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income," which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1997. SFAS No. 130 will require the Company to (a) classify items of other
comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and (b) display
the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained
earnings and additional paid in capital. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 130
in 1998.
In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information," which is effective for periods
beginning after December 15, 1997. SFAS No. 131 will require the Company to
report financial and descriptive information about its operating segments. The
Company will adopt SFAS No. 131 in 1998.
3. MARKETABLE SECURITIES:
At December 31, 1996 the Company held marketable equity securities with
historical costs of $5,010,095. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities," these securities are classified as available for sale. As
such, their carrying values are adjusted to fair market value with net
unrealized gains/losses included as a separate component of stockholders'
equity. At December 31, 1996, the fair market value of marketable securities
was $6,618,766 resulting in net unrealized gains of $1,608,671.
During the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, the Company sold
securities classified as available for sale for proceeds of $216,770 and
$5,269,110, respectively, resulting in realized losses of $5,733 in 1995 and
realized gains of $180,095 in 1996. During 1997, the Company distributed
marketable securities to
F-11
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
stockholders in conjunction with the Reorganization and realized a gain of
$3,922,099. The cost basis of securities sold was calculated using the
specific identification method.
4. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS:
The nature of the conversion and modification projects undertaken by the
Company can result in an individual contract comprising a large percentage of
a fiscal year's contract revenues. Similarly, relatively few companies own
offshore rigs. As a result, contracts performed for an individual customer may
comprise a significant portion of a particular year's contract revenue. During
the year ended December 31, 1997, the largest single contract represented 23%
of total contract revenues while the largest single customer accounted for 53%
of total revenue. A second customer accounted for 17% of total revenues.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the largest single contract
represented 15% of contract revenues and contracts with four separate
customers accounted for 12%, 17%, 24% and 31% of contract revenues. During the
year ended December 31, 1995, the most significant customer had a single
contract with the Company that represented 52% of contract revenue, with
revenues derived from the next largest customer representing 3% of contract
revenue.
5. INCOME TAXES:
Prior to June 15, 1997, the stockholders of the Predecessors elected to have
each entity taxed as an S Corporation for federal and state income tax
purposes, whereby the stockholders are liable for individual federal and state
income taxes on their allocated portions of such entity's taxable income. On
June 15, 1997, before the closing of the public offering, the stockholders of
the Predecessors elected to terminate the status of each Predecessor as an S
Corporation, and the Company and the Predecessors became subject to federal
and state income taxes.
The election resulted in the establishment of a net deferred tax liability
calculated at applicable federal and state income tax rates resulting
primarily from temporary differences arising from differences in depreciation
rates for tax and financial reporting purposes, timing of gain recognition
related to sales-type lease and unrealized appreciation in marketable
securities. The initial recordation of a net deferred tax liability by the
Company resulted in a provision for income taxes of $800,000.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes included in the statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 1997 is as follows:
Current...................................................... $7,258,000
Deferred--Attributable to activity subsequent to June 15,
1997........................................................ (117,000)
Deferred--Attributable to activity prior to June 15, 1997.... 800,000
----------
Income tax provision....................................... $7,941,000
==========
F-12
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 1997, differs
from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to
income before income taxes as result of the following:
PERCENT OF
TAX PRETAX INCOME
----------- -------------
Federal income tax computed on income before taxes.. $10,924,000 35.0%
(Decrease) Increase in tax resulting from:
Income earned as an S Corporation................. (3,700,000) (11.9)
Deferred income tax liability recorded upon C
Corporation election............................. 800,000 2.6
State income tax.................................. 658,000 2.1
Non-taxable distribution of marketable securities. (890,000) (2.9)
Other............................................. 149,000 0.5
----------- -----
Income tax provision............................ $ 7,941,000 25.4%
=========== =====
Temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax bases of assets and liabilities give rise to the following deferred
income taxes at December 31, 1997:
CURRENT NON-CURRENT
ASSET (LIABILITY) ASSET (LIABILITY)
----------------- -----------------
Fixed assets............................... $ -- $(516,000)
Compensation expense related to stock
option grants............................. -- 96,000
Gain on sale of assets..................... -- (308,000)
Accounts receivable valuation.............. (146,000) --
Accrued expenses........................... 154,000 --
Other...................................... -- 37,000
-------- ---------
Deferred income tax asset (liability).... $ 8,000 $(691,000)
======== =========
The Company has evaluated the need for a valuation allowance and, based on
the weight of the available evidence, has determined that it is more likely
than not that all deferred tax assets will be realized.
As an S Corporation, the tax attributes of the Predecessors flowed to the
stockholders and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes is included in
the results of operations for the Company prior to June 15, 1997. The pro
forma provision for income taxes is the result of the application of a
combined federal and state rate of 37% to income before income taxes for
periods prior to June 15, 1997.
F-13
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 5 to 39 years. Ordinary
maintenance and repairs that do not extend the physical or economic lives of
the assets are charged to expense as incurred.
A summary of property, plant and equipment follows:
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------
1996 1997
---------- -----------
Land held for investment................................ $ 409,833 $ --
Buildings............................................... 333,694 2,242,094
Machinery and equipment................................. 6,115,284 11,715,715
Dock facility........................................... 2,741,493 3,256,439
---------- -----------
Total property, plant and equipment................... 9,600,304 17,214,248
Less accumulated depreciation........................... 4,053,905 5,397,584
---------- -----------
Property, plant and equipment, net.................... $5,546,399 $11,816,664
========== ===========
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997,
was $425,445, $695,551 and $1,474,526, respectively.
7. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS:
A summary of short and long-term debt follows:
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------
DESCRIPTION 1996 1997
----------- ---------- -----------
Borrowings under 1996 Credit Facility.................. $1,501,000 $ --
Borrowings under 1997 Credit Facility.................. -- --
Notes payable to banks bearing interest at rates
ranging from 6.10% to 6.25%, maturing at dates ranging
from February 1997 to July 1997, secured by
certificates of deposit............................... 4,475,000 --
Brokerage margin account bearing interest at 7.75%, due
on demand and secured by equity securities............ 2,637,277 --
Note payable to a bank bearing interest at 10%,
repayable in monthly installments, maturing March
2005, secured by sales-type lease and related real
estate (See Note 11).................................. 1,628,915 1,090,392
Notes payable to financial institutions and others
bearing interest at rates ranging from 5% to 9.15%,
payable in monthly installments, maturing at dates
ranging from January 1998 to January 2000 and secured
by equipment, lease and real property................. 2,845,806 353,366
Bonds payable to MARAD bearing interest at 6.35%
payable in monthly installments commencing the sooner
of 6 months subsequent to completion of Greenwood
Island Facility or July 1, 2000....................... -- 24,817,000
---------- -----------
Total................................................ 13,087,998 26,260,758
Less: Short-term debt and current maturities of long-
term debt............................................. 10,235,349 493,829
---------- -----------
Long-term debt less current maturities............... $2,852,649 $25,766,929
========== ===========
F-14
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had a line of credit facility (the
"1996 Credit Facility") with a bank that permitted borrowings of up to the
lesser of $5,000,000 or 80% of eligible receivables. Borrowings under the 1996
Credit Facility bore interest at prime plus 1% (9.25% at December 31, 1996)
and were secured by accounts receivable and personal guarantees of certain
stockholders of the Company. The 1996 Credit Facility expired in July 1997.
The Company's current credit facility (the "1997 Credit Facility") provides
for accounts receivable and contract related inventory based borrowings of up
to $20,000,000 at prime plus 1/2% (8.47% at December 31, 1997) through March
20, 1998. At December 31, 1997, there was no outstanding balance under the
1997 Credit Facility and the borrowing base amount was $20 million. The 1997
Credit Facility requires that the Company maintain certain minimum net worth
and working capital levels and ratios and debt to equity ratios. At
December 31, 1997, the Company was not in compliance with one of the working
capital ratio provisions of the 1997 Credit Facility debt agreement; however,
the bank waived this compliance requirement.
In December 1997, the Company issued bonds under Title XI that are
guaranteed by MARAD to partially finance construction of the Company's
Greenwood Island Facility (See Note 2). The bonds bear interest at a rate of
6.35% and are payable over 15 years in semi-annual installments commencing 6
months from December 31, 1998, or from the date of the project's completion.
The financing agreement includes several restrictive financial and non-
financial covenants, the violation of which would carry monetary penalties.
The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 1997.
Short-term borrowings averaged $1,697,000 in 1995, $5,396,000 in 1996 and
$4,032,000 in 1997. Such borrowings were at average interest rates of 7.0%,
7.6% and 7.8%, respectively. The weighted average interest rates on all of the
Company's short-term borrowings was 7.2% at December 31, 1996. At December 31,
1997, the Company had no short-term borrowings outstanding.
A summary of short and long-term debt maturities at December 31, 1997,
follows:
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, AMOUNT
------------------------ -----------
1998........................................................ $ 493,829
1999........................................................ 1,771,986
2000........................................................ 1,784,292
2001........................................................ 1,797,886
2002........................................................ 1,812,904
Thereafter.................................................. 18,599,861
8. CONTRACT LABOR ARRANGEMENT:
In May 1997, the Company terminated its contract for craft labor with a
contract labor company. As a result, the Company directly employs craft labor
at levels of wages and benefits substantially equivalent to those formerly
provided. Prior to termination of the contract labor arrangement, the
Company's craft labor was provided by a contract employment company which was
owned by the spouse of an employee of the Company and whose only contract was
with the Company. The Company was charged the actual labor rate paid to the
employees plus a markup for employment taxes and insurance and the employment
company's profit, which was intended to be nominal. The marked up rates were
reviewed periodically and adjustments were made as considered necessary.
Payments for contract employment labor totaled $8,386,000, $10,132,000 and
$10,444,000, for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively.
In connection with the termination of contract labor arrangements, the
Company restructured its workmen's compensation insurance arrangements and
utilizes a different carrier from that used by the contract labor
F-15
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
company. The insurer who provided workmen's compensation coverage to the
employment contractor has asserted that rates higher than those charged during
part of 1995, all of 1996 and through the date of termination of the contract
labor arrangement were more appropriate and has submitted billings to the
labor contractor totaling approximately $900,000. The labor contractor
believes the original rates charged by the insurer were appropriate and is
vigorously disputing the additional billings. The insurer made a claim against
the Company which asserts the insurer's right to collect these additional
premiums from the Company. Management of the Company believes that the Company
has no obligation to the insurer and is vigorously defending this claim. While
the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, management of the Company
believes that this matter will not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.
9. POOLED RESOURCES ARRANGEMENT AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS:
In February 1994, the Company entered into an agreement (the "1994 Joint
Venture") with an unrelated entity to jointly perform services in connection
with the modification and upgrade of a customer's offshore drilling rig. Under
the terms of the 1994 Joint Venture, both the Company and the unrelated entity
were compensated for services each provided in connection with the contract at
agreed upon rates. Any net profits from the 1994 Joint Venture were shared
equally. The contract was completed during 1995, and the 1994 Joint Venture
was terminated. The Company recognized approximately $8.7 million of contract
revenue during the year ended December 31, 1995 for the amounts charged to the
1994 Joint Venture for services provided during 1995, together with the
Company's share of the net profit from the 1994 Joint Venture.
In December 1995, the Company and the same unrelated third party entered
into an agreement (the "1995 Joint Venture") to jointly pursue contract
opportunities and perform the related services. The 1995 Joint Venture was
originally for a term of five years; however, it was terminated by mutual
agreement in November 1996. The terms of the 1995 Joint Venture provided for
each party to be paid agreed upon rates for services performed in connection
with related contracts and for any net profits from the 1995 Joint Venture to
be shared equally. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company
recognized contract revenues of $9,838,000, together with the Company's share
of net profits from the 1995 Joint Venture.
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
Effective July 1, 1995, the Company adopted a qualified 401(k) employee
savings and profit sharing plan for the benefit of substantially all eligible
employees, including those of the labor contractors (See Note 8). Under the
plan, employees can contribute and defer taxes on compensation contributed.
The Company matches 25% of the contributions of the employees up to a maximum
of 5% of salary. The Company also has the option to make an additional profit
sharing contribution to the plan. Employer contributions to the plan during
the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, amounted to $10,171, $38,109
and $111,829, respectively.
The Board of Directors of the Company approved the payment of discretionary
incentive bonuses to key employees of the Company for 1997 in an aggregate
amount not to exceed five percent of the Company's EBITDA (defined as
operating income plus depreciation, amortization and non-cash compensation
expenses related to the issuance of stock and stock options to employees). In
the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company incurred $1,677,000 under such
agreements.
Prior to the Reorganization, HAM had historically used distributions,
bonuses, or a combination thereof, to the stockholders, who were also
employees of HAM, in order to provide a means by which the stockholders could
meet their income tax obligations arising from the pass through of HAM's
taxable income due to the status of HAM as an S Corporation. Included in
selling, general and administrative expenses are bonuses of approximately
$1,225,000 and $2,118,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996.
During 1997, the
F-16
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Company entered into employment agreements with the employees, who are also
stockholders, and established base compensation for the employees and provided
for the eligibility of the employees for participation in cash bonuses, if
any.
Also included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the years
ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, is non-cash compensation expense of
$1,080,000 and $1,017,000, respectively, related to stock issued or stock
options granted to employees.
In December 1996, HAM entered into an employment agreement with an
individual whereby the Company agreed to grant the employee shares of HAM's
common stock equal to 0.835% of the common shares outstanding as of January 1,
1997 (153,640 shares). As a result, HAM charged $1,080,000 to selling, general
and administrative expenses in 1996, which represents the value of the shares
granted based on an estimated initial public offering price for the Company's
common stock, less a 10% discount because the shares received by the employee
are not registered. In February 1997, HAM agreed to grant another employee
fully vested shares of common stock of HAM equal to approximately 0.418% of
the common shares then outstanding (76,820 shares) and granted that employee
options to purchase an equal amount of additional shares at $1.20 per share
that were to vest ratably on January 1, 1999, 2000 and 2001, subject to
forfeiture if the employee terminates employment. The options expire if
unexercised by December 31, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the option
agreements, all of the options outstanding became fully vested subsequent to
the initial public offering because of a change in ownership of the Company.
Accordingly, HAM charged $839,000 to selling, general and administrative
expenses in the year ended December 31, 1997.
In July 1997, the Company granted another employee options to purchase
common shares of the Company equal to approximately 1% of the common shares
then outstanding (200,000 shares at $1.25 per share) that vest ratably each
year from 1998 to 2002. The options expire if unexercised by December 31,
2006. The Company will recognize over the five-year vesting period
approximately $1,100,000 of compensation expense related to the options to
purchase additional shares. The deferred compensation to be recognized by the
Company is based on the initial public offering price of the Company's common
stock less the exercise price of the options. The Company recognized selling,
general and administrative expenses of $128,000 in the year ended December 31,
1997 related to this option grant.
All of the shares issued to employees in connection with the agreements
described above were exchanged for shares of the Company in connection with
the Reorganization. In addition, any options to purchase shares of HAM
outstanding at the time of the Reorganization were exchanged for options to
purchase shares of the Company, with the number of shares and option price
being changed based on the share exchange ratio used in the Reorganization.
In December 1997, the Company granted another employee options to purchase
17,130 shares of common stock at $29.188 per share, the fair market value of
the Company's stock on the grant date. The options become exercisable one
third annually over a three-year period. In connection with the grant of such
options, the Company also agreed to grant the employee additional options if,
on December 31, 2000, the fair market value of the stock subject to the
employee's options does not exceed the total exercise price of the employee's
options (whether or not exercised) by at least $500,000. The terms of the
additional options shall be such that the fair market value of the stock
subject to the additional options on the date of grant shall exceed the
exercise price of the additional options by an amount equal to the difference
between $500,000 and the excess of the fair market value of the stock subject
to the original options over the exercise price of the original options. The
Company will recognize the difference between $500,000 and the excess of the
fair value of stock subject to the original options over the exercise price of
the original options at each financial statement date as compensation expense
over the three-year vesting period. Selling, general and administrative
expense recognized in connection with this option grant was immaterial for the
year ended December 31, 1997.
F-17
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," which became effective in 1996. Under SFAS No. 123, companies
can either record expense based on the fair value of stock-based compensation
upon issuance or elect to remain under the current Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 ("APB 25") method whereby no compensation cost is recognized
upon grant if certain requirements are met. The Company accounts for its
stock-based compensation under APB 25. However, pro forma disclosures as if
the Company adopted the cost recognition requirements under SFAS No. 123 are
presented below.
If the compensation cost for the Company's 1997 grants for stock-based
compensation plans had been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the
Company's net income and earnings per common share for the year ended December
31, 1997 would have approximated the pro forma amounts below:
DECEMBER 31, 1997
---------------------
AS REPORTED PRO FORMA
----------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
PER SHARE DATA)
Net income......................................... $23,269 $19,731
Earnings per common share:
Basic............................................ $ 1.10 $ 0.94
Diluted.......................................... $ 1.09 $ 0.93
The fair value of each option granted during the period presented is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
with the following assumptions: (a) dividend yield of 0%, (b) expected
volatility of 45%, (c) risk-free interest rate ranging from 5.8% to 6.36% and
(d) expected life of ten years for employee options and five years for
director options.
A summary of the Company's stock options as of December 31, 1997 and changes
during the year then ended is presented below:
1997
--------------------------
NUMBER OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
--------- ----------------
Outstanding at beginning of year............... -- $ --
Granted...................................... 1,019,950 6.42
Expired...................................... -- --
Exercised.................................... -- --
--------- ------
Outstanding at end of year................. 1,019,950 $ 6.42
========= ======
Options exercisable at year-end............ 76,820 $1.195
Options vesting in future years............ 943,130 6.86
--------- ------
Options outstanding at year-end............ 1,019,950 $ 6.42
========= ======
F-18
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
at December 31, 1997.
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
---------------------------------- --------------------
NUMBER WEIGHTED
OUTSTANDING AVERAGE WEIGHTED NUMBER WEIGHTED
AT REMAINING AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AVERAGE
DECEMBER 31, CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE AT DECEMBER EXERCISE
RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES 1997 LIFE (YEARS) PRICE 31, 1997 PRICE
- ------------------------ ------------ ------------ -------- ----------- --------
$ 0.500................. 102,000 9.50 $ 0.500 -- $ --
1.195................. 76,820 9.00 1.195 76,820 1.195
1.250................. 200,00 9.00 1.250 -- --
8.500................. 606,000 9.50 8.500 -- --
17.000................. 10,000 10.00 17.000 -- --
25-46.50............... 25,130 9.85 33.800 -- --
11. LEASES:
The Company entered into a lease agreement in May 1985, with the Port
Authority for the lease of land for its dock facility. The primary lease
agreement expires in May 2005, with two additional ten-year options for
renewal. Effective June 21, 1995, the original lease agreement was revised to
include additional land. The revised agreement increased the annual lease
payment from $29,870 to $49,331. The lease has been recorded as an operating
lease for financial reporting purposes. In addition to the lease payment, the
Company pays $30,000 annually to the Port Authority in dredging fees related
to this lease.
In December 1996, the Company entered into another lease with the Port
Authority for additional dockspace and buildings adjacent to the Company's
existing shipyard facility. This lease agreement is for a period of two years
beginning in December 1996 and requires annual rental payments of $500,000.
The Company is also committed to the lease of office space in two locations
at combined annual rentals of approximately $185,000.
The Company entered into a lease in March 1997 for additional undeveloped
land located near the Company's existing shipyard. This lease is for a period
of 2 years and requires minimum annual lease rentals of $41,000.
Future minimum lease payments for all of the above arrangements are as
follows:
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, AMOUNT
------------------------ ----------
1998......................................................... $ 605,815
1999......................................................... 271,648
2000......................................................... 453,595
2001......................................................... 419,935
2002......................................................... 291,048
Thereafter................................................... 4,591,048
Lease expense was $37,367, $173,577 and $2,298,982 for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
In 1994, the Company merged with Gulf Boats, Inc. ("Gulf Boats"), an entity
with ownership identical to the Company's. In connection with that
acquisition, the Company purchased certain land, buildings and a dock
facility. In March 1995, the Company entered into an arrangement with an
unrelated party (the "Lessee") for lease of this property for a term of ten
years. The lease provides for monthly payments from the Lessee of
F-19
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
$50,000 during the first thirty-six months and $17,425 per month during the
remaining term. At about the same time, the Company borrowed $2,328,000 from a
bank with the lease being assigned as security for the loan. The loan bears
interest at 10% with the monthly payments and term of the promissory note
equal to the lease payments receivable from the Lessee. The Company granted
the Lessee an option to purchase the property at any time for an amount equal
to the outstanding principal balance, plus accrued interest, of the bank loan.
The Company has accounted for this lease as a sales-type lease. Accordingly,
the present value of future lease payments of $2,328,000 was recorded as an
investment in sales-type lease. In connection with the purchase of the
property, release of obligations and subsequent sales-type lease, the Company
realized a gain of approximately $1.7 million that is included in gain on sale
of assets in the 1995 statement of operations. Such gain represented the
amount by which the present value of future lease payments under the sales-
type lease exceeded the Company's carrying value of the leased assets. The
unearned discount attributable to future lease payments is being recognized as
interest income over the remaining term of the lease on the interest method.
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Modular Fabricators, Inc.
Some of the stockholders are also stockholders in Modular Fabricators, Inc.
("Modular"). During 1995, Modular advanced the Company $1,113,934 which the
Company repaid. Additionally, the Company advanced Modular $103,610 with
Modular repaying $56,416. The remaining amount due from Modular was forgiven
during 1995.
Transactions with Stockholders
The Company has made non-interest bearing loans to and paid expenditures on
behalf of its stockholders. During the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996,
the Company made advances to stockholders of $209,013 and $128,323,
respectively. Additionally, the Company fully repaid a loan from a stockholder
in the amount of $55,797 during 1995. During the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1996, stockholders made payments to the Company of $177,941 and $209,013,
respectively. Receivables from stockholders were $209,013 and $128,323 at
December 31, 1995 and 1996, respectively. There were no amounts receivable
from stockholders as of December 31, 1997.
At December 31, 1996, marketable securities owned by the Company with a
market value of approximately $1,390,000 were pledged as collateral for a
$1,400,000 loan from a financial institution to a stockholder which was used
to purchase the assets of Friede & Goldman, Ltd. (See Note 1). In connection
with the transfer of the purchased assets to Friede & Goldman, Friede &
Goldman recorded a $1,400,000 payable to the stockholder. On March 31, 1997,
the Company transferred the pledged marketable securities to the stockholder
in payment of the $1,400,000 payable and realized a gain of $237,868.
During 1997, HAM distributed certain assets to its stockholders. Assets
distributed included real estate previously held for investment with an
estimated market value of $1,075,000 and a carrying value of approximately
$302,000, along with related debt of $198,000, an airplane with an estimated
market value of $566,000 and a carrying value of approximately $486,000. The
difference between the estimated fair market value and the carrying value of
the distributed assets has been recognized as a gain in the statement of
operations for year ended December 31, 1997.
Between March 31 and June 30, 1997, one of the Predecessors made cash
distributions to its stockholders of approximately $1.4 million, primarily to
provide the stockholders with cash to meet income tax obligations on earnings
of such Predecessor prior to 1997. In addition, in contemplation of the
proposed initial public offering, one of the Predecessors distributed to its
stockholders marketable securities with a fair value of
F-20
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
approximately $4.8 million, together with related margin account debt of
approximately $2.7 million. Further, one of the Predecessors distributed
approximately $4.5 million to its stockholders representing the stockholders'
estimated income tax obligations on the earnings of the Predecessor during
1997 through the date of termination of its S Corporation status.
The Company maintains substantial cash deposits in a single financial
institution on whose Board of Directors the Company's President and Chief
Executive Officer sits. Deposits in this bank were in the amount of
$37,068,611 as of December 31, 1997.
The Company is obligated to make payments pursuant to an aircraft lease
agreement with Equipment Management Systems, a company owned primarily by the
Company's President. Under this lease, the Company is required to make monthly
payments of $50,000 per month for one year, as well as pay operating expenses
of the aircraft. Total costs paid by the Company pursuant to the aircraft
usage contract were $469,000 during 1997.
13. LITIGATION SETTLEMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
In August 1992, the Company filed suit against a third party for breach of
contract in connection with a contract. In May 1994, the Company was awarded a
judgment totaling $3,725,000. The judgment was appealed to the United States
Court of Appeals, which, in December 1995, upheld a judgment for approximately
$3,517,000. The defendants in the suit petitioned the court for a rehearing.
The rehearing was ultimately denied, and, in February 1996, the Company
received $3,466,635 as settlement of this litigation.
In 1995, the Company settled a lawsuit against a general contractor for
which Gulf Boats had served as a subcontractor prior to Gulf Boats' merger
into the Company. Settlement proceeds of $750,000 are included in the
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1995.
In connection with the construction of the Greenwood Island Facility, the
County of Jackson, Mississippi, agreed to dredge the ship channel and build
roads and other infrastructure under an economic incentive program. The terms
of the economic incentive program require that the Company maintain a minimum
employment level of 400 jobs through the Greenwood Island Facility during the
primary term of the Greenwood Island Facility's 20-year lease. If the Company
fails to maintain the minimum employment level, the Company could face
statutory penalties under Mississippi law, which include the repayment of the
remaining balance of the $6 million loan incurred by the county to finance
such improvements.
The nature of the Company's activities relating to the conversion, retrofit
and repair of drilling rigs subjects its property and employees, along with
the property and employees of its customers and others to hazards which can
cause personal injury or damage or destruction of property. Although the
Company maintains such insurance protection as it considers economically
prudent, there can be no assurance that any such insurance will be sufficient
or effective under all circumstances or against all hazards to which the
Company may be subject. In particular, due to the cost of errors and omissions
policies related to the design of drilling rigs and production units, the
Company does not carry insurance covering claims for personal injury, loss of
life or property damage relating to such design activity. A successful claim
for which the Company is not fully insured could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
F-21
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
14. COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS:
The Company's contracts in progress at December 31, 1996 and 1997, consist
of the following components:
1996 1997
---------- ------------
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts................. $2,309,822 $ 31,285,459
Estimated earnings thereon.............................. 911,912 20,357,148
---------- ------------
3,221,734 51,642,607
Less billings applicable thereto........................ 6,199,850 88,130,342
---------- ------------
$2,978,116 $ 36,487,735
========== ============
Included in accompanying balance sheets under the
following captions:
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts................................ $ 284,052 $ --
========== ============
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts................................ $3,262,168 $ 36,487,735
========== ============
15. ACQUISITION SUBSEQUENT TO YEAR-END:
In January 1998, the Company purchased the assets of Newfoundland Ocean
Enterprises Ltd. of Marystown Newfoundland ("Marystown"), a steel fabrication
and marine construction concern with operations similar to those of the
Company. The acquisition was effected pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement,
dated January 1, 1998 (the "Share Purchase Agreement"). Under the terms of the
Share Purchase Agreement, the Company paid a purchase price of US $1 (one
dollar). However, the Share Purchase Agreement also provides that, among other
things, the Purchaser (i) maintain a minimum of 1.2 million man-hours
(management, labor, salaried and hourly) for each of the 1998, 1999 and 2000
calendar years, (ii) undertake certain capital improvements at the acquired
shipyards and (iii) pay to the sellers fifty percent (50%) of net after tax
profit of Marystown for the twelve-month period ending March 31, 1998. The
Company has also indicated its intent to invest C$5 million to C$15 million
(approximately US $3 million to US $10 million) to maintain and expand the
business. The Share Purchase Agreement provides that the Company will pay to
the Seller liquidated damages of C$10 million in 1998, or C$5 million in 1999
and 2000, in any of such years in which the minimum number of man-hours
described above is not attained. The acquisition of Marystown will be
accounted for as a purchase with the assets acquired being recorded by the
Company at their estimated fair value and an approximate equal amount being
recorded as a deferred government subsidy.
In February 1998, the Company acquired, for cash payments of approximately
$25,000,000, a French holding company and its French subsidiaries. The holding
company will operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Through its
subsidiaries, the holding company designs and manufactures mooring, anchoring,
rack-and-pinion jacking system and cargo handling equipment.
F-22
FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
16. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA:
QUARTER ENDED
-------------------------------------------------
1997 MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
---- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Revenue.................... $18,654,636 $26,868,560 $34,628,577 $33,019,760
Gross profit............... 5,854,739 10,244,570 11,410,748 10,425,785
Operating income........... 3,232,258 6,746,816 8,546,199 7,313,955
Income before taxes........ 4,557,516 9,722,114 8,945,328 7,985,447
Net income................. 4,557,516 8,472,114 5,475,267 4,764,588
Pro forma net income....... 2,872,516 6,177,114 5,475,267 4,764,588
Net income per share
Basic.................... $ 0.25 $ 0.46 $ 0.24 $ 0.20
Diluted.................. $ 0.25 $ 0.46 $ 0.23 $ 0.19
Pro forma net income per
share
Basic.................... $ 0.16 $ 0.34 $ 0.24 $ 0.20
Diluted.................. $ 0.16 $ 0.34 $ 0.23 $ 0.19
QUARTER ENDED
-------------------------------------------------
1996 MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
---- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Revenue.................... $2,964,895 $5,582,467 $5,775,817 $7,435,536
Gross profit............... 538,735 1,764,026 1,783,686 1,903,288
Operating income (loss).... (403,562) 395,010 288,291 (963,375)
Income (loss) before taxes. 3,183,393 528,989 249,234 (1,173,478)
Net income (loss).......... 3,183,393 528,989 249,234 (1,173,478)
Pro forma net income
(loss).................... 2,005,393 332,989 153,234 (735,478)
Net income (loss) per share
Basic.................... $ 0.17 $ 0.03 $ 0.01 $ (0.06)
Diluted.................. $ 0.17 $ 0.03 $ 0.01 $ (0.06)
Pro forma net income (loss)
per share
Basic.................... $ 0.11 $ 0.02 $ 0.01 $ (0.04)
Diluted.................. $ 0.11 $ 0.02 $ 0.01 $ (0.04)
F-23