Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
| |
|
OR |
| |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the Transition Period
from to |
000-50511
Commission File Number
United America Indemnity, Ltd.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
Cayman Islands |
|
98-0417107 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
WALKER HOUSE, 87 MARY STREET
P.O. BOX 908GT
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN
CAYMAN ISLANDS
(Address of principal executive office including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(345) 949-0100
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act: None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Class A Common Shares, $0.0001 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). YES þ NO o
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the
price of the registrants Class A Common shares as of
the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter (based on the last reported sale
price on the Nasdaq National Market as of such date), was
$170,225,104.
As of March 14, 2005, the registrant had outstanding
23,632,201 Class A Common Shares and 12,687,500
Class B Common Shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
its 2005 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held
May 4, 2005 are incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As used in this annual report, unless the context requires
otherwise, (1) United America Indemnity,
we, us, and our refer to
United America Indemnity, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated
with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and
its U.S. and Non-U.S. Subsidiaries; (2) our
U.S. Subsidiaries refers to U.N.
Holdings II, Inc., U.N. Holdings Inc., Wind River
Investment Corporation, Emerald Insurance Company, and our
U.S. Insurance Operations; (3) our
U.S. Insurance Operations refers to the
insurance and related operations conducted by American Insurance
Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including American Insurance
Adjustment Agency, Inc., International Underwriters, LLC, J.H.
Ferguson & Associates, LLC, and the United National
Insurance Companies; (4) the United National
Insurance Companies refers to the insurance and related
operations conducted by United National Insurance Company and
its subsidiaries, including Diamond State Insurance Company,
United National Casualty
1
Insurance Company, and United National Specialty Insurance
Company; (5) our Non-U.S. Subsidiaries
refers to our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations, U.A.I.
(Gibraltar) Limited, the Luxembourg Companies, Wind River
Services, Ltd., and Loyalty Insurance Company, Inc.;
(6) our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations
refers to the insurance and reinsurance and related operations
of Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda;
(7) Wind River Barbados refers to Wind River
Insurance Company (Barbados), Ltd.; (8) Wind River
Bermuda refers to Wind River Insurance Company, Ltd.;
(9) the Luxembourg Companies refers to U.A.I.
(Luxembourg) I S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) II S.ar.l.,
U.A.I. (Luxembourg) III S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) IV
S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) Investment S.ar.l., and Wind River
(Luxembourg) S.ar.l.; (10) United National
Group refers to our U.S. Insurance Operations,
Emerald Insurance Company, and Loyalty Insurance Company;
(11) the United National Statutory Trusts
refers to United National Group Capital Trust I and United
National Group Capital Statutory Trust II;
(12) Fox Paine & Company refers to Fox
Paine & Company, LLC and affiliated investment funds;
and (13) $ or dollars refers to
U.S. dollars.
As a result of our merger on January 24, 2005 with
Penn-America Group, Inc. and Penn Independent Corporation,
(1) United America Indemnity Combined refers to
United America Indemnity, Penn-America Group, and Penn
Independent Group; (2) Penn-America Group
refers to Penn-America Group, Inc., the Penn-America Insurance
Companies, and the Penn-America Statutory Trusts; (3) the
Penn-America Insurance Companies refers to the
insurance and related operations of Penn-America Insurance
Company, Penn-Star Insurance Company, and Penn-Patriot Insurance
Company; (4) the Penn-America Statutory Trusts
refers to Penn-America Statutory Trust I and Penn-America
Statutory Trust II; (5) Penn Independent
Group refers to Penn Independent Corporation, PIC
Holdings, Inc., Penn Independent Financial Services, Inc., and
Penn Independent Agency Operations; (6) Penn
Independent Agency Operations refers to Stratus Insurance
Services, Inc., Apex Insurance Agency, Inc., APEX Insurance
Services of Illinois, Inc., Summit Risk Services, Inc., Delaware
Valley Underwriting Agency, Inc. (DVUA), DVUA
Pittsburgh, Inc., DVUA of New York, Inc., DVUA of New
Jersey, Inc., DVUA West Virginia, Inc., DVUA North Carolina,
Inc., DVUA of Ohio, Inc., DVUA South Carolina, Inc., and DVUA
Virginia, Inc.; (7) our Combined
U.S. Subsidiaries refers to our
U.S. Subsidiaries, Penn-America Group, and Penn Independent
Group; (8) our Combined
Non-U.S. Subsidiaries refers to our
Non-U.S. Subsidiaries and Penn Oceanic Co., Ltd.;
(9) our Combined U.S. Insurance Operations
refers to our U.S. Insurance Operations, Penn-America
Insurance Companies, Penn Independent Financial Services, Inc.,
and Penn Independent Agency Operations; (10) our
Combined U.S. Insurance Subsidiaries refers to
the United National Insurance Companies and the Penn-America
Insurance Companies; and (11) Statutory Trusts
refers to the United National Statutory Trusts and the
Penn-America Statutory Trusts.
2
PART I
Recent Developments
On January 24, 2005 we completed our previously announced
merger with Penn-America Group, Inc. (NYSE: PNG) as well as the
previously announced acquisition of Penn Independent
Corporation. In connection with the transactions, our
shareholders approved our change in name from United
National Group, Ltd. to United America Indemnity, Ltd.
As a result of the transactions, we are one of the leading
specialty property and casualty insurers in the industry as well
as a significant originator of and placement agent for specialty
property and casualty insurance coverage. Under our ownership
structure, each company will retain its existing corporate
identity and the businesses of United America Indemnity,
Penn-America Group and Penn Independent Group will continue to
be operated by essentially the existing management teams.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Penn-America Group,
Inc.s shareholders received $15.375 of value for each
share of Penn-America Group, Inc. common stock as follows:
(1) 0.7756 of a Class A common share of United America
Indemnity, based on $13.875 divided by the volume weighted
average sales price of United America Indemnitys
Class A common shares for the 20 consecutive trading
days ending January 21, 2005, which was $17.89, and
(2) $1.50 in cash.
At the Penn-America Group, Inc. special meeting held on
January 24, 2005, Penn-America Group, Inc.s
shareholders of record as of December 15, 2004 voted to
approve, among other things, the merger transaction, and at the
United America Indemnity extraordinary general meeting held on
January 24, 2005, United America Indemnity shareholders of
record as of December 15, 2004 voted to approve, among
other things, the issuance of United America Indemnity
Class A common shares to Penn-America Group, Inc.s
shareholders in the merger and to change the name of United
National Group, Ltd. to United America Indemnity, Ltd.
Where considered appropriate, references to the business and
operations of Penn-America Group and Penn Independent Group have
been included in Item 1 Business,
Item 2 Properties, and Item 3
Legal Proceedings of Part I of this annual report on
Form 10-K. Item 4 of Part I and
Parts II, III, and IV of this annual report on
Form 10-K pertain exclusively to the business and
operations of United America Indemnity, unless specifically
noted otherwise.
On February 7, 2005, Edward J. Noonan, a current board
member and former chairman of the audit committee of United
America Indemnity, was appointed as the Acting Chief Executive
Officer of United America Indemnity, following the departure of
David R. Bradley.
Trading of United America Indemnity Class A common shares
will continue on the Nasdaq Stock Market. On March 14,
2005, we changed our trading symbol from UNGL
to INDM.
General
United America Indemnity is a holding company formed on
August 26, 2003 under the laws of the Cayman Islands to
acquire our U.S. Insurance Operations.
Through our U.S. Insurance Operations we are a leading
specialty property and casualty insurer with a 45-year operating
history in the specialty insurance markets. Our Combined
U.S. Insurance Subsidiaries are led by United National
Insurance Company and Penn-America Insurance Company, which was
acquired on January 24, 2005. The United National Insurance
Companies are either licensed or eligible to write on a surplus
lines (non-admitted) basis in all 50 U.S. States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin
Islands. The Penn-America Insurance Companies write business on
both an admitted and non-admitted basis in 37 states, on
only an admitted basis in one state, and on only a non-admitted
basis in 12 states and the District of Columbia. In March
2005, Penn-America Insurance Company capitalized its wholly
owned subsidiary, Penn-Patriot Insurance Company, which is in
the process of finalizing its application for a certificate of
authority to write business on an admitted basis in the state of
Virginia.
3
Our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations, which consist of
Barbados-based and Bermuda-based insurance companies, began
offering insurance products to third parties in May 2004 and
reinsurance to our U.S. Insurance Operations in January
2004.
We write specialty insurance products that are designed to meet
the specific needs of targeted niche insurance markets. These
niche markets are typically well-defined, homogeneous groups of
insureds to which, due to some particular risk exposure,
standard market insurers do not offer insurance coverage.
Examples of products that we write for these markets include
property and casualty insurance for social service agencies,
insurance for equine mortality risks and insurance for vacant
property risks. We believe that our specialty insurance product
focus and niche market strategy has enabled us to outperform the
property and casualty industry as a whole.
For 2004, our GAAP combined ratio was 92.8%. We have reported an
underwriting profit, based on our GAAP financial statements, in
19 of the past 20 years. The combined ratio of an insurance
company is generally viewed as an indication of underwriting
profitability and is calculated by adding the underwriting
expense ratio and the net losses and loss adjustment expense
ratio.
We compete in the specialty insurance market principally through
our two primary business segments, our excess and surplus lines
(E&S) segment and our specialty admitted
segment. We offer four general classes of insurance products
across both of these primary business segments: specific
specialty insurance products, umbrella and excess insurance
products, property and general liability insurance products and
professional liability insurance products.
We distribute the insurance products of our Combined
U.S. Insurance Subsidiaries through our wholly owned
subsidiary, J.H. Ferguson and Associates, LLC (J.H.
Ferguson), and a group of professional general agencies
that have limited quoting and binding authority and that in turn
sell our insurance products to insureds through retail insurance
brokers. At January 24, 2005, United America Indemnity
Combined had approximately 135 professional general agencies in
our marketing and distribution network.
Through Penn Independent Group, which we acquired on
January 24, 2005, we have become a leading
U.S. wholesale broker of commercial insurance for small and
middle-market businesses, public entities and associations. Penn
Independent Group is comprised of five major businesses,
including: DVUA, a wholesale agency primarily providing
insurance polices on an excess and surplus lines basis; Apex
Insurance Agency, Inc., a specialty and reinsurance broker for
municipalities and government agencies; Stratus Insurance
Services, Inc., a niche association-based broker; Summit Risk
Services, Inc., a third party claims administrator; and Penn
Independent Financial Services, Inc., a premium finance company.
Our United National Insurance Companies are rated A
(Excellent) by A.M. Best, which assigns ratings to insurance
companies transacting business in the United States.
A (Excellent) is the third highest rating of sixteen
rating categories. These ratings are based upon factors of
concern to policyholders, such as capital adequacy, loss reserve
adequacy, and overall operating performance, and are not
directed to the protection of investors. Penn-America Insurance
Company and Penn-Star Insurance Company are rated A-
(Excellent) by
A.M. Best. A- (Excellent) is the
fourth highest rating of sixteen rating categories. Penn-Patriot
Insurance Company, which is in the process of finalizing its
application for a certificate of authority to write business on
an admitted basis in Virginia, is not yet operational and,
therefore, has not received a rating from A.M. Best.
In December 2004, our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations were
assigned financial strength ratings by A.M. Best. Wind
River Bermuda was assigned a rating of A-
(Excellent) and Wind River Barbados was assigned a rating of
A (Excellent).
We maintain a website at www.uai.ky, although the
information contained on our website is not part of this report.
We will make available, free of charge on our website, our most
recent annual report on Form 10-K and subsequently filed
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on
Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to,
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4
Recent Trends in Our Industry
The property and casualty insurance industry has historically
been a cyclical industry. During periods of reduced underwriting
capacity, as defined by availability of capital, lower
competition generally results in more favorable policy terms and
conditions for insurers. During periods of excess underwriting
capacity, pricing and policy terms and conditions are generally
less favorable to insurers due to competition. In the past,
several factors have affected underwriting capacity, including
industry losses, catastrophes, changes in legal and regulatory
guidelines, investment results and the ratings and financial
strength of competitors.
We believe that during the 1990s, the insurance industry
maintained excess underwriting capacity. As a result, the
industry suffered from lower pricing, less favorable policy
terms and conditions, less stringent underwriting standards and
reduced profitability. Significant catastrophic losses in 1999
and a subsequent contraction of underwriting capacity led to
price increases and policy terms and conditions more favorable
to insurers in 2000.
We believe that these favorable conditions continued and
improved in 2001 when the property and casualty insurance
industry experienced a severe dislocation as a result of an
unprecedented impairment of capital, causing a substantial
contraction in industry underwriting capacity. We believe that
this reduction in capacity is a result of, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
|
losses caused by the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, which resulted in the largest insured loss in history; |
| |
| |
|
the recording of reserve charges resulting from substantial
reserve deficiencies, relating to asbestos, environmental and
directors and officers liability related claims and from poor
underwriting in the late 1990s; |
| |
| |
|
substantial investment losses as a result of a decline in the
global equity markets and significant credit losses, with the
Insurance Services Office estimating that the U.S. property
and casualty industry as a whole had realized and unrealized
losses from the end of 2000 through the end of 2002 of
$33 billion; |
| |
| |
|
the exit or insolvency of several insurance market participants,
such as Reliance Group, Legion Insurance Company, Frontier
Insurance Group, GAINSCO and American Equity, each of which
either exited particular lines of business or significantly
reduced their activities; |
| |
| |
|
the ratings downgrade of a significant number of insurers and
reinsurers; and |
| |
| |
|
increased financial scrutiny of insurers and financial services
companies by federal and state regulatory authorities as a
result of high-profile corporate scandals and of the resulting
changes in corporate governance. |
These factors have resulted in a general environment of rate
increases and conservative risk selection, more restrictive
coverage terms and a significant movement of premium from the
standard market to the specialty insurance market. During 2003,
demand for insurance products to manage risks continued to
accelerate while underwriting capacity decreased. This
environment began to moderate during 2004. There is no assurance
that this trend will continue.
Consistent with the trends witnessed in the broader property and
casualty market, during 2003 and 2002, our rate increases on
renewal business across all active segments approximated 30% and
23%, respectively. During 2004, our rate increases on renewal
business approximated 9%, which rates we will earn over the
period of time for which the policies are in force, generally
12 months.
Specialty Insurance Market
The specialty insurance market differs significantly from the
standard property and casualty insurance market. In the standard
property and casualty insurance market, insurance rates and
forms are highly regulated, products and coverages are largely
uniform and have relatively predictable exposures. In the
standard market, policies must be written by insurance companies
that are admitted to transact business in the
5
state in which the policy is issued. As a result, in the
standard property and casualty insurance market, insurance
companies tend to compete for customers primarily on the basis
of price and financial strength.
In contrast, the specialty insurance market provides coverage
for hard-to-place risks that do not fit the underwriting
criteria of insurance companies operating in the standard
market. We segregate the specialty insurance market into two
components: the E&S market and the specialty admitted
market. In the E&S market, insurance rates and forms are not
regulated and can be tailored to meet specific risks. However,
U.S. insurance regulations generally require a risk to be
declined by three admitted carriers before an E&S lines
insurance company may write the risk. The specialty admitted
market includes policies written to cover hard-to-place risks,
including risks associated with insureds engaged in similar but
highly specialized types of activities. These insureds are
generally forced to rely on specialty admitted insurance
companies for one of two reasons: such insureds require a total
insurance product not otherwise available from standard market
insurers, or such insureds require insurance products that are
not written by large admitted carriers. For regulatory or
marketing reasons, these insureds require products that are
written by an admitted insurance company.
Competition in the specialty insurance market tends to focus
less on price and more on availability, service and other
considerations. While specialty insurance market exposures may
have higher perceived insurance risk than their standard market
counterparts, specialty insurance market underwriters
historically have been able to generate underwriting
profitability superior to standard market underwriters.
According to A.M. Best, in 2003, the average combined ratio
for insurers operating in the E&S market was
7.8 percentage points lower than that of insurers operating
in the property and casualty industry as a whole.
According to A.M. Best, from 1983 through 2003, the surplus
lines market grew from an estimated $2.1 billion in direct
premiums written to $32.8 billion. In contrast, the
U.S. property and casualty industry grew more moderately
during this period from $114.4 billion in direct premiums
written to $456.7 billion. During this period, the surplus
lines market as a percentage of the total property and casualty
industry grew from approximately 1.8% to 8.3%. Additionally, the
growth in terms of commercial lines market share, which
comprises the majority of surplus lines premiums, increased from
3.5% to 13.1% over this period.
The specialty insurance market is significantly affected by the
conditions of the insurance market in general. Hard market
conditions (i.e., those favorable to insurers), like those
experienced in recent years, tend to generate a proportion of
business moving from the admitted market back to the surplus
lines market, and vice versa when soft market conditions are
prevalent. During hard markets, standard market underwriters
generally rely on traditional underwriting methods and make
adjustments in policy terms, conditions and limits. The firming
of the current property and casualty market, which we believe
commenced in 2000, caused standard market carriers to refocus on
their core books of business.
Initially, the market shift into the E&S market
occurred at a gradual pace. According to A.M. Best data,
direct premiums written by the domestic E&S market increased
by 8.5% in 2000. Once admitted carriers began to stress
underwriting criteria and risk selection techniques in an effort
to bolster their operating profits by eliminating non-core lines
of business, rather than re-pricing them, the movement of
premiums to surplus lines accelerated. As a result, direct
premiums written in the domestic E&S market grew 36.6% in
2001, 81.7% in 2002, and 31.1% in 2003. Growth of direct
premiums written in the total E&S market, which includes
domestic professional E&S underwriters, Lloyds of London,
other regulated non-domestic insurers and domestic specialty
underwriters was 9.8% in 2000, 35.7% in 2001, 61.7% in 2002, and
28.3% for 2003.
Acquisition of Our U.S. Insurance Operations
On September 5, 2003, Fox Paine & Company made a
capital contribution of $240.0 million to us, in exchange
for 10.0 million Class B common shares and
14.0 million Series A preferred shares, and we
acquired Wind River Investment Corporation, the holding company
for our U.S. Insurance Operations, from a group of family
trusts affiliated with the Ball family of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
To effect this acquisition, we used $100.0 million of this
$240.0 million capital contribution to purchase a portion
of the common stock of Wind River Investment Corporation held by
the Ball family trusts. We then purchased the remainder of the
common stock of Wind River Investment Corporation that was also
held by
6
the Ball family trusts, paying consideration consisting of
2.5 million Class A common shares, 3.5 million
Series A preferred shares and senior notes issued by Wind
River Investment Corporation having an aggregate principal
amount of approximately $72.8 million, which remain fully
outstanding and which we have fully and unconditionally
guaranteed.
Of the remaining $140.0 million contributed to us, we then
contributed $80.0 million to our U.S. Insurance
Operations, used $42.4 million to capitalize our
Non-U.S. Insurance Operations and used $17.6 million
to fund fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
acquisition.
Initial Public Offering of Class A Common Shares
(IPO)
In December 2003, we consummated our IPO of 10,750,000
Class A common shares, including 1,000,000 Class A
common shares issued in connection with the exercise of a
portion of the underwriters overallotment option, at a
price of $17.00 per share. Proceeds of the offering less
underwriting discounts of $12.8 million were
$170.0 million. Expenses for the IPO totaled
$4.4 million, resulting in net proceeds to us of
$165.6 million (the IPO Proceeds). We used
$150.0 million of the IPO Proceeds to fund the redemption
of all our Series A preferred shares. We contributed the
remaining proceeds of $15.6 million to our
Non-U.S. Insurance Operations. In January 2004, we issued
462,500 Class A common shares in connection with the
exercise of the underwriters remaining overallotment
option at a price of $17.00 per share. Proceeds to us, net
of underwriting discounts of $0.5 million, were
$7.3 million, which we contributed to our
Non-U.S. Insurance Operations.
Business Segments
We currently operate our business principally through two
business segments: E&S and specialty admitted. We
de-emphasized our reinsurance segment in 2002 and have not
written any business in that segment in 2002, 2003, or 2004.
Our E&S segment focuses on writing insurance for
hard-to-place risks and risks that standard admitted insurers
specifically choose not to write. Our eligibility as an E&S
lines insurer allows us to underwrite unique risks with more
flexible policy forms and unregulated premium rates. This
flexibility typically results in coverages that are more
restrictive and more expensive than those offered in the
standard admitted market. In 2003, the United States E&S
market as a whole represented approximately $32.8 billion
in direct premiums written according to A.M. Best, or
approximately 7.2% of the $456.7 billion United States
property and casualty industry direct premiums written.
According to A.M. Best, the E&S market as a whole grew
28.1% from 2002 to 2003 on the basis of direct premiums written.
In 2004, we had $260.8 million of gross premiums written in
the E&S market.
Our specialty admitted segment focuses on writing insurance for
risks that are unique and hard to place in the standard admitted
market for insureds that are required, for marketing and
regulatory reasons, to purchase insurance from an admitted
insurance company. We estimate that the specialty admitted
market as a whole is comparable in size to the E&S market.
The specialty admitted market is subject to more state
regulation than the E&S market, particularly with regard to
rate and form filing requirements, restrictions on the ability
to exit lines of business, premium tax payments and membership
in various state associations, such as state guaranty funds and
assigned risk plans. In 2004, we had $148.3 million of
gross premiums written in the specialty admitted market.
Our reinsurance segment includes assumed business written in
support of a select group of direct writing reinsurers. All
underwriting exposure under this segment has been commuted. We
de-emphasized our reinsurance segment in 2002 and have not
written any business in that segment in 2002, 2003, or 2004.
7
The following table sets forth an analysis of United America
Indemnitys gross premiums written, which is the sum of
direct and assumed reinsurance premiums written, by segment
during the periods indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S
|
|
$ |
260,785 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
$ |
465,866 |
|
|
|
69.7 |
% |
|
$ |
543,998 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
% |
|
Specialty admitted
|
|
|
148,288 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
202,514 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
249,085 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total gross premiums written
|
|
$ |
409,073 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
668,380 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
793,083 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and Product Development
The following chart provides representative examples of certain
products we offer by product class within the E&S and
specialty admitted segments for specific types of customers:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Product Class |
|
Product |
|
Customer |
|
Hypothetical Claim |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Specialty
|
|
Equine mortality |
|
Owner of pleasure or show horse |
|
Horse dies |
| |
|
Dealer open lot physical damage |
|
Auto dealer distribution center |
|
Car on open lot damaged due to hail storm |
|
Umbrella and Excess
|
|
Umbrella liability coverage over multiple $1 million
liability coverage |
|
Small to medium size businesses, such as warehouses, retail
stores, commercial contractors and apartment buildings |
|
Employee car accident, trip and fall or products claim |
| |
|
Excess liability coverage over $1 million primary general
liability policy |
|
Small to medium size businesses seeking to purchase more than
$1 million general liability limit policies |
|
Trip and fall or products claim |
|
Property and General Liability
|
|
Commercial packages |
|
Small businesses, such as warehouses, retail stores and
restaurants |
|
Trip and fall or premises claim |
| |
|
Bicycle manufacturing |
|
Retail bicycle store and bicycle warehouse |
|
Trip and fall or product malfunction claim |
| |
|
Vacant dwelling |
|
Home of an individual that recently entered a nursing home |
|
Fire damage |
|
Non-Medical Professional Liability
|
|
Social Service Agency |
|
Rehabilitation centers and counseling centers |
|
Case worker does not properly supervise charge |
| |
|
Educators and legal liability |
|
School boards |
|
Teacher sues for discrimination if released prior to tenure |
We develop products that expand solutions for our current
customer base, as well as provide new products where a market
demand for a specialty solution exists. We utilize a thorough
due diligence process to determine the market dynamics,
distribution, and profitability potential for products we
review. In house actuarial review, loss analysis, and profit
calculations are employed as well as claims reviews by our
staff. Our direct contacts with our field offices, agents, and
customers enable us to identify high quality opportunities. We
leverage to our advantage our flexibility to utilize the
distribution approach providing the best and most efficient
market access. Retail, wholesale brokerage, and general agency
models are utilized where appropriate. Where outsourced
underwriting models such as general agents are chosen, strict
controls are in place to
8
assure compliance with our processes and underwriting guidelines
including, daily monitoring, monthly product reviews by senior
management and, with respect to the majority of our general
agent appointments, regular on-site audits.
The following table sets forth an analysis of United America
Indemnitys gross premiums written, which is the sum of
direct and assumed reinsurance premiums written, by product
class within our E&S and specialty admitted segments during
the periods indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific specialty
|
|
$ |
93,662 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
$ |
284,000 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
$ |
412,191 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
% |
|
Umbrella and excess
|
|
|
38,897 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
160,176 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
236,099 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
Property and general liability
|
|
|
190,049 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
133,679 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
77,944 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
Non-medical professional liability
|
|
|
86,465 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
90,525 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
66,849 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
409,073 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
668,380 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
793,083 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth an analysis of United America
Indemnitys net premiums written, which is gross premiums
written less ceded premiums written, by product class within our
E&S and specialty admitted segments during the periods
indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific specialty
|
|
$ |
39,780 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
$ |
57,025 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
$ |
81,882 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
Umbrella and excess
|
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
8,818 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
12,668 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
Property and general liability
|
|
|
170,964 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
99,836 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
54,892 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
Non-medical professional liability
|
|
|
62,992 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
34,702 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
23,247 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
280,208 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
200,381 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
172,689 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently acquired Penn-America Group primarily offers products
that fall within two out of four of our product categories:
(1) property and general liability and (2) umbrella
and excess.
Under the property and general liability product class,
Penn-America Group provides general liability, property and
multi-peril policies to small commercial businesses with average
annual premiums of approximately $2,000.
|
|
|
| |
|
General liability coverage provides limits generally between
$25,000 and $3.0 million per occurrence, with the majority
of such policies having limits between $0.5 million and
$1.0 million. General liability policy premiums for
coverage in excess of $1.0 million per occurrence are
considered excess. See discussion on umbrella and excess
products below. |
| |
| |
|
Property coverage provides limits usually no higher than
$2.0 million per risk, with most policies written at limits
of $1.0 million per risk or less. |
| |
| |
|
Multi-peril policies provide the same property and liability
coverages bundled together as a package for its
insureds. |
Under the property and general liability product class,
Penn-America Group wrote gross premiums written of
$254.0 million and net premiums written of
$224.6 million in 2004.
9
Under the umbrella and excess product class, Penn-America Group
provides:
|
|
|
| |
|
umbrella coverage with limits of liability up to
$5.0 million per occurrence on policies where either it or
another carrier writes the primary $1.0 million in general
liability; and |
| |
| |
|
excess coverage with limits of liability up to $2.0 million
per occurrence on policies where it writes the primary
$1.0 million in general liability. |
Under the umbrella and excess product class, Penn-America Group
wrote gross premiums written of $5.4 million and net
premiums written of $0.4 million in 2004. Penn-America
Group reinsures a significant portion of the risk on its
umbrella and excess product. See Business
Reinsurance.
Geographic Concentration
The following table sets forth the geographic distribution of
United America Indemnitys gross premiums written for the
periods indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
$ |
72,462 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
$ |
70,999 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
$ |
66,858 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
California
|
|
|
49,529 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
71,836 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
81,573 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
31,134 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
39,968 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
34,704 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
27,177 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
66,330 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
88,990 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
22,826 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
25,682 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
23,157 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
29,542 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
27,449 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
16,279 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
29,443 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
51,220 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
13,415 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
38,898 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
76,498 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
26,243 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
27,872 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
11,161 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
26,621 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
31,711 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal
|
|
|
273,161 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
|
425,562 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
510,032 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
| |
All others
|
|
|
135,912 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
242,768 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
281,831 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
409,073 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
668,330 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
791,863 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently acquired Penn-America Group writes business in all
50 states and the District of Columbia. In 2004, only one
state accounted for over 10% of the $259.4 million of gross
premiums written by the Penn-America Group
California with 10.3%.
Marketing and Distribution
We primarily market the insurance products of our
U.S. Insurance Operations through a group of
79 professional general agencies, including our wholly
owned subsidiary J.H. Ferguson, that have limited quoting and
binding authority and that in turn sell our insurance products
to insureds through retail insurance brokers. We primarily
market the insurance products of our Non-U.S. Insurance
Operat