Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

     
(Mark One)    
     
[X]   Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 or
     
[  ]   Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from          to      
     
    Commission File Number: 0-17401

OPTIMUMCARE CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   33-0218003

 
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
30011 Ivy Glenn Drive, Suite 219
Laguna Niguel, California
  92677

 
(Address of principal
executive offices)
  (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 495-1100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of Each Class   Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

 
     
None   None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 Par Value


(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for, such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   YES   [X]   NO  [ ]


Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     [   ]   YES    [X]   NO      

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company on February 3, 2003 (4,293,803 shares of Common Stock) was $837,292 based on the average bid and asked price of the Company’s voting stock on February 3, 2003.*

The number of shares outstanding of each of the Company’s classes of Common Stock, as of February 3, 2003 was 5,908,675 shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.


*          This value is not intended to make any representation as to value or worth of the Company’s shares of Common Stock. The number of shares held by the Company has been calculated by subtracting shares held by controlling persons of the Company from the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company.

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1 — BUSINESS
ITEM 2 — PROPERTIES
ITEM 3 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4 — SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II
ITEM 5 — MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6 — SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9 — CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
PART III
ITEM 10 — DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12 — SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13 — CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 14 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART IV
ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 10.148
EXHIBIT 10.149
EXHIBIT 10.150
EXHIBIT 21.1
EXHIBIT 23.1


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1 - BUSINESS

(a) General Development of Business

OptimumCare Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in California on November 25, 1986 and was reincorporated in Delaware on June 29, 1987. In mid-1987, the Company commenced the development and marketing of health care facility-based programs (“Programs”) to be managed by the Company primarily for the treatment of depression and certain other mental health disorders (“PsychPrograms”), as well as programs for alcohol and drug abuse (“Treatment Programs”). After the Company obtains a contract for the establishment of one or more Programs at a host health care facility, the Company recruits and trains the staff needed to operate its programs. Typically, the host health care facility provides a specified number of beds for the Program, as well as all other support services required for the operation of the Program, including nursing, dietary, housekeeping, billing and other administrative functions. The Company recruits and trains the staff to operate the Program. The Company’s staffing of a Program will usually include a medical director, a program director, a psychologist, a chief therapist and one or more counselors or social workers.

Contracts are individually negotiated with each host health care facility and include approximately 20 beds for the Company’s inpatient contract, and 40 to 50 chairs for the Company’s partial hospitalization and outpatient contracts. Generally, the Company and the host health care facility negotiate a management fee based on the scope of services provided by the Company, number of beds, rates charged and reimbursements received by the facility. The Company receives a fixed monthly fee of approximately $62,000 per month for the Company’s inpatient contract, and $79,200 per month for partial hospitalization and outpatient contracts. The health care facility charges the patient on a daily basis in accordance with a fee schedule of prescribed rates, except where the insurer provides for payment which is limited to a maximum number of days per patient. In some cases, reimbursement of direct costs are also received. Certain contracts contain provisions which deny portions or all of the management fee should patient days be ultimately appealed and denied by the patient payor.

The Company also currently has a short-term consulting contract with a hospital which approximates $25,000 per month.

During the second half of 2002, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Associated Staffing Resources, Inc. (the “Staffing Subsidiary”). On July 29, 2002 the Staffing Subsidiary acquired certain assets of Associated Social Resources, Inc., a healthcare staffing company. The major assets of the business acquired were its long term contractual relationships with hospitals, its employees and its computer software which invoices the hospitals based on time worked by its employees. On November 7, 2002 the Staffing Subsidiary acquired certain assets of another healthcare staffing company, Social Work Services, Inc. The Staffing Subsidiary negotiates contracts with hospitals to provide staffing (primarily social workers and marriage and family counselors) at an hourly rate. The marriage and family counselors and social workers are

1


Table of Contents

employees of the Staffing Subsidiary. Revenues from the operations of the Staffing Subsidiary approximate 23% of the Company’s consolidated 2002 revenues. Plans currently exist for additional acquisitions during 2003, which should increase the amount of potential revenues generated by the Staffing Subsidiary.

As of February 3, 2003, the Company had four contracts with three hospitals: one inpatient and one partial hospitalization contract with Huntington InterCommunity Hospital, D/B/A Humana Hospital Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach, California, one partial hospitalization Psych/Outpatient contract with Sherman Oaks Hospital and Health Center, Sherman Oaks, California, and management and marketing contract with La Palma InterCommunity Hospital, La Palma, California.

As of February 3, 2003, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Associated Staffing Resources, Inc. had approximately 60 active hospitals under contract to provide temporary staffing services, located primarily in the Los Angeles, California area.

On March 12, 2003, the Company, through its subsidiary OptimumCare Staffing, Inc., completed the acquisition of the assets of Chicago Care Nurse Staffing, L.L.C., a healthcare staffing company in Orlando, Florida. The major assets of the business acquired are its long term contractual relationships with healthcare facilities and healthcare workers.

(b)  Financial Information About Industry Segments

The Company’s core business is the development, marketing and operation of contract Programs. During the second half of 2002, the Company entered into the temporary medical staffing business. The following tables sets forth selected financial information about industry segments:

FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2002

                                 
    Contract Programs   Staffing Services   Corporate   Total
   
 
 
 
Revenues
  $ 4,129,113     $ 1,237,167     $ 26,512     $ 5,392,792  
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 1,098,141     $ 34,728       ($1,565,143 )   $ (432,274 )
Total Assets
  $ 0     $ 817,855     $ 1,936,267     $ 2,754,122  

(c) Narrative Description of the Business

(i) and (ii) Products

OptimumCare’s Psych Programs (“Inpatient Program”)

The Inpatient Program is a medically-supervised psychiatric care program for short term intensive evaluation and treatment of patients with diagnoses ranging from acute depression to serious and chronic behavioral health problems, such as schizophrenia. Patients receive treatment 24 hours per day, which includes individual psychotherapy, medication regimen, group therapy, and discharge planning and placement, under the supervision of a psychiatrist in conjunction with a multi disciplinary team (registered nurses, licensed vocational nurses, social workers, activity therapists, medical physicians, and mental health workers). The Company

2


Table of Contents

estimates that the average length of stay for a patient in an Inpatient Program is approximately 3-10 days.

OptimumCare’s Partial Hospitalization Programs (“Partial Hospitalization”)

Partial Hospitalization is a treatment approach that provides an alternative to inpatient treatment. It provides a daily program for a maximum of 20 hours per week, prescribed by psychiatrist. It is for voluntary patients with serious behavioral health disorders who require intensive and multi disciplinary treatment, which cannot be provided in a less intensive outpatient setting. As an alternative to inpatient treatment, it provides a more flexible, less costly and less restrictive form of treatment. Treatment consists of group therapy, activity therapy, medication monitoring, and individual therapy related to the specific needs of each client. The Program staff acts as a liaison in assisting the client in accessing resources within the community. The Company estimates that the average length of stay for a patient in a partial hospitalization program is approximately 3 weeks to 3 months.

OptimumCare’s Outpatient Services

Outpatient Services is a component of a partial hospitalization program intended for patients with long-term, chronic conditions. Treatment must, at a minimum, be designed to reduce or control the patient’s psychiatric symptoms so as to prevent relapse requiring a higher level of care. For patients with long-term, chronic conditions, control of symptoms and maintenance of a functional level to avoid further deterioration or hospitalization is an acceptable expectation of improvement.

Outpatient Services is a voluntary program. Patients attend up to a maximum of 10 hours a week, as prescribed by a psychiatrist, under the direct supervision of the multi disciplinary team. Treatment includes individual and group therapy with a range of activities geared toward the individual needs of each patient. Length of stay varies, depending on the needs of the individual.

Outpatient Services provides a third level in the continuum of care that enables patients to enter an OptimumCare program at an appropriate level, then advance as their treatment progresses to a point where they feel confident, productive and able to experience life fully with minimal intervention.

Associated Staffing Resources Inc.’s Temporary Staffing Services

Temporary Staffing Services is a venue for hospitals to procure the expertise of qualified healthcare professionals on a temporary basis without incurring the burden of seeking, training and employing such individuals.

Staffing

The PsychProgram and Partial Hospitalization Programs are staffed by the Company with a medical director, a program manager, and in some cases, a psychologist, a chief therapist, and at least one therapist or social worker. The key staff members are the medical director and the

3


Table of Contents

program manager. The medical director is a licensed psychiatrist who is a staff member of the host health care facility and is engaged as an independent contractor charged with the responsibility for overseeing the administration of the Program from a medical/regulatory compliance viewpoint. In addition to the medical director who is responsible for administering the clinical aspects of the contract, the Company often engages co-medical directors in each community in which a Program is located. These co-medical directors are licensed psychiatrists or psychologists. They provide administrative assistance to a Program and represent it at various professional activities in the local community. The co-medical directors are compensated at a fixed monthly rate, depending on the amount of time they commit to supporting the Company’s Programs. The Company’s employees and contractors at each program are subject to approval and pre-employment screening by the host health care facility. The Company has not experienced any difficulty in locating qualified medical directors from the hospital staff to affiliate with the Company’s Programs. The program manager is a full time employee of the Company and usually has completed either a bachelor’s or master’s degree program in psychology or social work. Program managers are officed at their respective Program’s facility.

Associated Staffing Resources Inc.’s temporary staffing services are staffed with qualified healthcare professionals (primarily marriage and family counselors and social workers). The Staffing Subsidiary does recruit individuals by advertising in certain trade journals. However, most of the employees are referred to the company through other employees and professionals in the healthcare industry. Potential employees are carefully screened based on their prior experience. The Staffing Subsidiary accepts only highly trained candidates since employees need to be able to respond in various environments, in a very independent manner.

Contract Operations

The Company provides a host health care facility with staff recruitment, a two-week pre-opening in-service nurse and hospital employee training program, program management, continuing education, community education, ongoing public relations and program quality assurance.

The Company provides these training programs to the host health care facility at no charge. Typically, nursing, dietary, X-ray, laboratory, housekeeping, admissions and billing are the responsibility of the host health care facility.

The following is a list of current contracts:

         
    TYPE OF   CONTRACT
    PROGRAM   EXPIRATION DATE
   
 
CONTRACT #1   INPATIENT
START DATE:
  NOVEMBER 2003(1)
    11/91    
CONTRACT #2   PARTIAL
START DATE:
  OCTOBER 2003(2)
    10/92    
CONTRACT #3   PARTIAL
START DATE:
  JUNE 30, 2003
    9/95    

4


Table of Contents

         
CONTRACT #4   MANAGEMENT AND
MARKETING
CONSULTING
START DATE:
  JUNE 15, 2003 (2)
    6/02    

(1) Automatically extended for successive one year periods, unless terminated with 120 days notice.

(2) Automatically extended for successive one year periods, unless terminated with 90 days notice.

Staffing Services Operations

The Staffing Subsidiary currently has approximately 60 active hospitals that contract for its services. Contracts specify the rate per hour charged for services commensurate with the level of training of the employee. Contracts are typically for one year and are not mutually exclusive between the hospital and the Staffing Subsidiary. The hospital supervisor engaged by the Staffing Subsidiary approves the hours worked by employees through time sheets, which serve as the source documents for billing the hospital and paying the employee wages. The Staffing Subsidiary has a small administrative staff and utilizes a computer software application to perform these billing and payroll tasks.

Payment for Services

Patients are screened by the host healthcare facility prior to admission. Screening procedures include verification of the existence and extent of insurance coverage.

It is the host health care facility’s responsibility to bill and collect the fees charged to the patient for all program services. The Company in turn bills the host health facility for services provided at the specified contract rate. Generally, the Company bills the host health care facility within five days after the close of the month in which the services were rendered. Except in the cases where the contracts provide for specific hold backs for ultimately denied days, the majority of the contracts do not specifically provide that the Company shall bear any risk of non-payment by the host healthcare facility. However, industry practice dictates that the Company acknowledge that a certain percentage of the fees will be uncollected by the host health care facility. Thus, accommodations are expected to be made on a case-by-case basis with each host health care facility (except where there is an express contractual provision which governs this issue) to offset some portion of Program patients’ bad debts experienced by the host health care facility.

Regulatory Matters

Many of the hospitals with which the Company contracts have a large number of Medicare and Medicaid patients. It is unknown whether in the future other contracts or programs will be dependent on a disproportionate amount of Medicare/Medicaid patients. However, the Company has negotiated with these hospitals whereby it is paid a flat monthly fee with a hold back for days

5


Table of Contents

ultimately denied which exceed a specified threshold. Thus, the Company is not directly dependent on Medicare or Medicaid for payment under its current contracts.

The healthcare facilities rely upon payment from Medicare. The healthcare facilities are reimbursed their costs on an interim basis by Medicare fiscal intermediaries and the health care facilities submit annual cost reimbursement reports to the fiscal intermediaries for audit and payment reconciliation. The healthcare facilities seek reimbursement of the Company’s management fees from these fiscal intermediaries as part of their overall payments from Medicare.

Revision of legislation related to Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement, if enacted, could have a negative effect on the revenues of the hospitals with which the Company contracts. Generally, the Company’s agreements with hospitals require the Company and the hospital to renegotiate rates in the event of a significant legislative change which affects the compensation received by the hospital. It is uncertain at this time to what extent the Company’s revenues may be impacted by changes to Medicare/Medicaid policies.

Medicare is part of a federal health program which is administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services which has established Health Care Financing Administration (“HCFA”) to promulgate rules and regulations governing Medicare and the benefits associated therewith.

All of the programs currently managed by the Company are treated as “provider based” programs by HCFA. This designation is important since partial hospitalization services are covered only when furnished by a “provider,” i.e., a hospital. To the extent the partial hospitalization programs are not located in a site which is deemed by HCFA to be “provider-based,” there would not be Medicare coverage for the services furnished at the site under Medicare’s partial hospitalization benefit. In August, 1996, HCFA published criteria for determining when programs operated in facilities separate from a hospital’s main premises may be deemed to be “provider-based” programs.

During November, 2001, additional changes were made to existing provider-based regulations which require all provider-based entities to receive designation as such by October 1, 2002. In general, entities will be considered provider-based if they are operated under the same license and common ownership and control, under the main provider’s direct day-to-day supervision, clinically and financially integrated with the main provider, held out to the public as part of the main provider, and located near the main provider and serve the same patient population. The Company believes that the programs it currently manages will continue to be treated as “provider- based.”

During August 2000, the Company implemented a prospective payment system for all outpatient hospital services. The amount paid by Medicare is a per diem fee adjusted by a geographic wage index, less a “coinsurance” of twenty percent (20%) of the charges which is ordinarily to be paid by the patient. The coinsurance must be charged to the patient by the provider unless the patient is indigent. If the patient is indigent, or if the patient does not pay the provider the billed coinsurance amounts after reasonable collection efforts, the Medicare program will in some

6


Table of Contents

instances pay these amounts as allowable Medicare bad debts. Interim payments under the prospective payment system are currently being phased in over a three year period. A portion of the per diem fee is actually computed on a cost to charge formula. Aggregate reimbursements to most of the healthcare facilities with which the Company contracts have not materially changed from those previously received prior to the implementation of the prospective payment system.

To the extent that healthcare facilities which contract with the Company for management services suffer material losses in Medicare payments, there is a greater risk to the Company of non-payment, and a risk that the healthcare facilities will terminate or not renew their contracts with the Company. Thus, even though the Company does not submit claims to Medicare, it may be adversely affected by reductions in Medicare payments or other Medicare policies.

The Company anticipates that additional legislation may be adopted focusing on controlling health care costs and improving access to medical services for persons who are uninsured. Such legislation may also affect the amount that health care providers can charge for services. The Company believes that it is well positioned to respond to these changes and that it is likely that the Company will experience a lesser impact than other companies in the health care industry based on the fact that the Company has already focused its efforts on shortening patient stays and has historically provided a greater percentage of its services to Medicaid patients than have many of its competitors.

Some of the hospitals with which the Staffing Subsidiary contracts are government owned and require various levels of government approval. There is no indication that this issue presents a risk to the Staffing Subsidiary’s ability to seek or obtain these types of contracts.

Marketing

The Company’s marketing efforts are primarily directed toward increasing the number of management contracts by either the takeover of existing programs operated by others or the establishment of new Partial Hospitalization or PsychPrograms in geographically desirable areas. The Company believes that its ability to secure new contracts is based on its reputation as a quality provider coupled with its history of low length of patient stays resulting in less uncompensated care.

Sales calls are primarily directed at health care facilities which may be experiencing a low or declining patient census and facilities in geographically desirable areas. After a contract is obtained, the Company prepares a detailed marketing development strategy aimed at attracting patients to the Programs.

The program director for each PsychProgram at the host health care facility develops a local plan, in conjunction with the program community liaison. The strategy is to increase public awareness of the Program. All Programs share the goal that is consistent with the Company’s overall plan. The host hospital’s administrative and medical staffs are also encouraged to participate in community relations activities.

7


Table of Contents

The Company emphasizes direct contact with psychiatrists, psychologists and other licensed professionals because these individuals motivate potential patients to seek inpatient treatment for their mental health. Licensed Community Care Residential Facilities are also targeted because the residents often require inpatient psychiatric treatment. The Company’s approach emphasizes the care giver at these residential facilities to become involved in one-on-one communication with the professionals who will provide patient referrals. These professionals and care givers are invited to the Company sponsored community relations activities, speaker programs and continuing education seminars.

The Staffing Subsidiary markets its services to hospitals through advertising in various trade journals and publications primarily in the Los Angeles, California area. However, most of the contracted hospitals are referred to the Company by other healthcare professionals.

(iii) Raw Materials

Inapplicable.

(iv) Patents and Trademarks

The Company holds a federal service mark, Registration #1628745, for its trade name “OptimumCare.” The Company has marketed its programs under the names “OptimumCare PsychProgram” and “OptimumCare Treatment Program.”

(v) Seasonality

The Company acknowledges that patient volume appears to be susceptible to some seasonal variation. Census tends to substantially decrease near certain holidays, particularly during the fourth quarter, where individuals are more reluctant to hospitalize family members. However, all of the Company’s contracts are based on fixed monthly management fees, which eliminate seasonal risk.

(vi) Working Capital Items

The Company expects to experience an initial delay of up to 90 days in receipt of revenues after each Program is opened due to the normal processing time for the billing/payment cycle of the host health care facilities.

(vii) Dependence on a Few Customers

The Company presently has four Contracts operating with three hospitals. The Company has a significant amount of variable expenses associated with the production of its revenues, although certain fixed costs do exist. To that end, the loss of a contract customer has a significant adverse effect on the Company’s profit margin. However, the Staffing Subsidiary has a large number of small contracts with various hospitals and one customer that represents twenty-seven percent (27%) of total staffing revenues. This mitigates some of the risk associated with the Company’s dependence on a few contracts.

8


Table of Contents

(viii) Backlog

Inapplicable.

(ix) Government Contracts

Inapplicable.

(x) Competition

The Company competes with other health care management companies for contracts with acute care hospitals. Also, the Company’s Programs will compete for patients with the programs of other hospitals and other health care facilities. The success of the Company’s Programs is also dependent on its ability to establish relationships with sources of patient referrals.

The Company’s principal competitors include Charter Medical Corporation, Comprehensive Care Corporation, Mental Health Management, PMR Corporation and Horizon Health Services, most of which have greater financial and other resources and more experience than the Company. In addition, some health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”) offer competing programs; however, the HMO-owned hospitals typically do not provide inpatient psychiatric services, or coverage for these services. Most HMOs also do not provide programs for partial hospitalization or substance abuse, but often provide coverage for these programs, usually at a reduced rate.

Other health care facilities offer comparable programs which compete with the Company’s Programs in each service area. The Company believes, however, that in general its community awareness efforts are primarily effective within a ten (10) mile radius around the host hospital and that patients outside such radius are not directly affected by such advertising unless their personal physician has admitting privileges and recommends the Company’s program at that host hospital.

The temporary staffing business, which the Company operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, also competes with other staffing companies for contracts with acute care hospitals. Principal competitors in the industry are Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Cross Country Inc. and AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. These companies have significantly greater financial and other resources than the Staffing Subsidiary. However, much of the business is based on referrals, reputation and geographic area. As such, the Staffing Subsidiary believes that it has no significant competitor in the Los Angeles area.

The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in obtaining contracts with health care facilities are experience, reputation for quality programs, the availability of program support services and price. The primary competitive factors in attracting referral sources and patients are reputation, record of success, quality of care and location and scope of services offered by a host health care facility. The Company implements active promotional programs and believes it is competitive in attracting referral sources and patients based on these factors.

9


Table of Contents

(xi) Research and Development

Inapplicable.

(xii) Government Regulation and or Environmental Protection

     The health care industry is extensively regulated by federal, state and local governments. Regulations that affect the Company relate to controlling the growth of health care facilities, requiring licensure of the host health care facility, requiring certification of the Program at the host facility and controlling reimbursement for health care services. Licensure of facilities and certification of Programs are state requirements, while certification for Medicare is a federal requirement. Compliance with the licensure and certification requirements is monitored by annual on-site inspections by representatives of the licensing agencies. Loss of licensure or Medicare certification by a host facility could result in termination of a contract with the Company.

Certificate of need (“CON”) laws in some states require approval for capital expenditures in excess of certain threshold amounts, expansion of bed capacity or facilities, acquisition of medical equipment or institution of new services. If a CON must be obtained, it may take up to 12 months to do so, and in some instances longer, depending upon the state involved and whether the application is contested by a competitor or the state agency. CON’s usually are issued for a specified maximum expenditure and require implementation of the proposed improvement within a specified period of time. Certain states, including California, Texas, Utah, Colorado and Arizona, have enacted legislation repealing CON requirements for the construction of new health care facilities, the expansion of existing facilities and the institution of new services. Some states have enacted or have under legislative consideration “sunset” provisions which require the review, modification or deletion of these statutes when no longer needed. The Company is unable to predict whether such legislative proposals will be enacted but believes that the elimination of CON requirements positively impacts its business.

The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (“JCAHO”), at a facility’s request, participates in the periodic surveys conducted by state and local health agencies to ensure continuous compliance with all licensing requirements by health care facilities. JCAHO accreditation satisfies certain of the certification requirements for participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. A facility found to comply substantially with JCAHO standards receives accreditation. A patient’s choice of a treatment facility may be affected by JCAHO accreditation considerations because most third-party payers limit coverage to services provided by an accredited facility. All of the hospitals currently under contract with the Company have received JCAHO accreditation.

The laws of various states in which the Company may choose to operate, including California, generally prevent corporations from engaging in the practice of medicine. These laws (e.g., Section 2052 of the California Business and Professions Code), as well as applicable case law, were enacted to protect the public from the rendering of unnecessary medical or other services for treatment of the ill. Although the Company has not obtained a legal opinion, it believes that

10


Table of Contents

the establishment and operation of Programs will not cause it to be engaged in the “practice of medicine” as that term is used in such laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are subject to interpretation and, accordingly, the issue is not free from doubt. Since the Company has not sought or obtained any rulings, there can be no assurance that state authorities or courts will not determine that the Company is engaged in the unauthorized practice of medicine. If such a determination is made and is not overturned, the Company would have to terminate its operations in that state.

The Company’s medical directors are engaged to provide administrative services, including but not limited to planning the clinical program, supervising the clinical staff, establishing standards of professional care, and advising the Company and staff on questions of policy. The co-medical directors assist the medical directors in performing their duties. Although the Company has not obtained a legal opinion, it believes that the proposed agreements between the Company and its medical and co-medical directors do not violate any fee-sharing prohibitions. The federal prohibition, as it relates to the Medicare program, is found at 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b. Such prohibitions are found in Section 650 of the California Business and Professional Code and Section 445 of the California Health and Safety Code, as well as comparable statutes in other states. However, future judicial, legislative or administrative interpretations of these arrangements could prohibit the Company from hiring professionals which could have a materially adverse effect on the Company.

Given the recent political mandate for health care reform, it appears likely that health care cost containment will occur. However, legislation has begun to recognize the need for placing mental health illness on par with other physical ailments. For example, federal legislation effective in 1998, (the Kennedy-Kassebaum bill), mandates parity with other reimbursable medical services for those who receive behavioral health care. This law raised the lifetime cap from the current $50,000 level to $1 million. The Company is practiced in administrating “managed care type” programs and is familiar with the pressures of improving productivity and reducing costs.

(xiii) Employees

As of February 3, 2003, the Company employed approximately 65 persons full-time and 64 persons part-time. Those figures do not include physicians and psychiatrists who are medical directors of the Company’s Programs and not employees. The Staffing Subsidiary employed 50 full-time and 33 part-time employees as of March 9, 2003.

(d)  Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales

 Inapplicable.

ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES

The Company maintains its corporate offices in an approximately 1,277-square-foot suite of executive offices in Laguna Niguel, California, under a lease agreement providing for a monthly base rent of $2,235 which expires June 30, 2003. The Company leases additional satellite corporate offices in Culver City and Venice, California. The lease agreement for Culver City, California provides for a monthly base rent of $3,434 for the first year of the agreement. Rent

11


Table of Contents

increases are scheduled annually through the lease expiration date of November 30, 2006. The lease agreement for Venice, California provides for a monthly base rent of $2,884 and is on a month to month basis. In addition, the Company also maintains an office in Mission Hills, California to service potential incoming patient inquiries under a lease agreement providing for a monthly base rent of $1,313 which expires October 31, 2003. The Company believes that this office space is adequate for its reasonably foreseeable needs. It is expected that the expiring leases will be renewed on similar terms.

The Company leased space under two separate lease agreements for the operation of its outpatient partial hospitalization programs. One agreement was between the Lessor and the Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) which was scheduled to expire November 30, 2003. However, the Company was obligated to pay the lease costs for the program, under its contract with the facility which initially expired December 6, 2010. The Company terminated its contract with the CMHC effective March 8, 2002. The other agreement expired August 14, 2002. Aggregate payments were $38,949 for the year ended December 31, 2002.

In August, 2002 the Company began leasing space for the operations of the Staffing Subsidiary by accepting the terms and conditions of the existing lease of the entity acquired. The lease provides for a monthly rent of $2,500 for offices in Los Angeles, California which expires August 1, 2005.

In November, 2002, the Company became obligated on another lease in Seal Beach, California through a business acquisition. On November 25, 2002, the lease was assigned for the full term and payment, therefore, the Company has no financial impact from this obligation.

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Inapplicable.

ITEM 4 - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Inapplicable.

12


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER
MATTERS

(a) Market Information

The Company’s common stock is currently quoted on the over the counter “OTC” electronic bulletin board under the symbol OPMC.

                   
      High Bid   Low Bid
     
 
 
2002:
               
 
Fourth Quarter
    5/16       1/8  
 
Third Quarter
    3/8       1/8  
 
Second Quarter
    29/64       11/64  
 
First Quarter
    5/8       11/32  
 
 
2001:
               
 
Fourth Quarter
    45/64       1/2  
 
Third Quarter
    23/32       15/32  
 
Second Quarter
    49/64       27/64  
 
First Quarter
    25/32       33/64  

The listed prices represent inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actula transactions.

(b) Holders

The approximate number of holders of record of each class of the Company’s common equity securities as of the close of business on February 3, 2003 is set forth below:

         
      Approximate
  Title of Class   Number of Record Holders
 
 
  Common Stock, $.001 par value   225  

(c) Dividends

The Company has not paid or declared cash dividends on its Common Stock. The Company does not anticipate the payment of cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

The transfer agent for the Company’s common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York.

13


Table of Contents

ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto of the Company included elsewhere herein, and such data should be read with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The data at December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and for each of the fiscal years in the three year period ended December 31, 2002 are derived from the Company’s Financial Statements for such years which were audited by Lesley, Thomas, Schwarz & Postma, Inc. which Financial Statements are included elsewhere herein.

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                         
    2002   2001   2000   1999   1998
   
 
 
 
 
Contract Revenues
  $ 4,129,113     $ 6,906,496     $ 8,010,491     $ 10,553,427     $ 11,409,690  
Temporary Staffing Revenues
  $ 1,237,167     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
Net (Loss) Income
  ($ 432,274 )   ($ 572,398 )   $ 391,686     $ 365,798     $ 377,133  
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock
  ($ 0.07 )   ($ 0.10 )   $ 0.07     $ 0.06     $ 0.06  
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock
  ($ 0.07 )   ($ 0.10 )   $ 0.06     $ 0.06     $ 0.06  
Weighted Number Of Shares Outstanding
    5,908,675       5,908,675       5,907,511       5,910,939       6,567,280  
Total Diluted Shares
    5,942,444       6,018,323       6,164,140       6,028,496       6,699,648  
Cash Dividends Per Common Share
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  

The net loss amounts set forth above include the results of operations of the Staffing Subsidiary, which commenced operations as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company during the second half of 2002 and includes the acquisition of two companies – Associated Social Resources, Inc. on July 29, 2002 and Social Work Services, Inc. on November 7, 2002. Without these acquisitions, net loss would have been $467,002 and basis and diluted loss per share would have been $.08.

BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31
                                         
    2002   2001   2000   1999   1998
   
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
  $ 2,754,122     $ 4,053,950     $ 3,933,483     $ 3,462,345     $ 3,154,744  
Current Assets
  $ 2,397,040     $ 4,015,433     $ 3,398,132     $ 3,115,702     $ 2,652,044  
Current Liabilities
  $ 304,007     $ 1,171,561     $ 478,696     $ 415,182     $ 429,375  
Net Working Capital
  $ 2,093,033     $ 2,843,872     $ 2,919,436     $ 2,700,520     $ 2,222,669  
Long-Term Obligations
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  

14


Table of Contents

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Safe harbor statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The statements in this Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Form 10-K are forward-looking in time and involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with plans, the effect of changing economic and competitive conditions, government regulation which may affect facilities, licensing, healthcare reform which may affect payment amounts and timing, availability of sufficient working capital, Program development efforts and timing and market acceptance of new Programs which may affect future sales growth and/or costs of operations.

(a) Liquidity and Capital Resources

At fiscal year end 2002 and 2001, the Company’s working capital was $2,093,033 and $2,843,872, respectively. The decrease in working capital for the year is primarily due to the net operating loss generated by the Company for the year along with the purchase of two new business entities during the year. On July 29, 2002, the Company acquired certain assets of Associated Social Resources, Inc., a healthcare staffing company, through a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary. On November 7, 2002, the subsidiary acquired certain assets of Social Work Services, Inc., which is also a healthcare staffing company. The nature of the Company’s business requires significant working capital to fund operations of its programs as well as to fund corporate expenditures until receivables can be collected. Moreover, because each of the existing contracts represents a significant portion of the Company’s contract business, the inability to collect certain of the accounts receivable could materially and adversely affect the Company’s liquidity. The Company evaluates the collectibility of its receivables on a case by case basis. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2002 has decreased from those which existed at December 31, 2001. This decrease is primarily due to the collection of receivables from two contracts with one hospital that were terminated April 30, 2002. At December 31, 2002, all contract accounts receivable were less than ninety days outstanding. Temporary staffing receivables at December 31, 2002 were approximately $564,605. This balance is composed of many small dollar accounts. However more than 50% of the balance is due from three hospitals. Management believes that no collection problems with respect to these receivables exist. Accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts has been recorded at December 31, 2002.

Cash flows used in operations were $508,384 for the year ended December 31, 2002. This primarily resulted from the net operating loss incurred during the year, discussed above.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $359,272 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Funds received were from principal payments on a note receivable from an officer. Funds used were payments for the purchase of short-term government securities and two new business entities.

15


Table of Contents

No cash was received from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Company had a line of credit with a bank which expired February 28, 2003. The maximum indebtedness under the line was $1,500,000. Amounts allowable for draw were based on 80% of certain qualified accounts receivable. The line of credit is currently in the process of renegotiation. The new agreement is expected to be a ninety day commitment for a maximum indebtedness of $750,000 computed on a similar basis as the previous agreement. The Company’s principal sources of liquidity for the fiscal year 2003 are cash on hand, accounts receivable, the line of credit with a bank and continuing revenues from programs. The company has contractual obligations under operating leases of $316,885. Payments due in less than one year total $107,556. Payments due in one to three years total $153,404. Payments due in four to five years total $55,925.

(b) Results of Operations

Fiscal Year 2002 Compared to Fiscal Year 2001

The Company operated six programs during the year ended December 31, 2002, and nine programs during the year ended December 31, 2001. As of February 3, 2002, the Company had one inpatient, two partial hospitalization programs and one consulting contract. Net revenues from contract programs were $4,129,113 and $6,906,496 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in net revenues is due to the decrease in the number of programs.

Cost of contract services provided were $3,030,972 and $5,796,162 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. This decrease is due to the decrease in the number of contract programs.

Revenues for temporary staffing services were $1,237,167 for the year ending December 31, 2002. Costs of providing these services were $1,202,439 for the same period. Revenues and operations for the year commenced during the third quarter of 2002.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1,843,882 and $2,104,770 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to the decrease in compensation expense among years partially offset by the increases in costs related to the acquisitions made during the year. Although executive bonuses were reduced during 2002 and certain positions were eliminated due to the downsizing of the contract program sector of the business, costs of independent consultants and legal costs necessary to perform the acquisitions have increased from the prior year.

The provision for uncollectible accounts were $0 and $9,865 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company provides for uncollectible accounts on a case by case basis. The provision for uncollectible accounts among periods relates to different programs which existed at December 31, 2002 versus 2001.

The Company’s income tax benefit has decreased in 2002 over 2001 due to a smaller net loss generated by the Company in 2002.

16


Table of Contents

Net loss was $(432,274) and $(572,398) for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The loss was primarily due to decreasing revenue coupled with the high costs of acquiring two new business entities during the year. Net loss would have been $467,002 in 2002 without taking into account the two acquisitions.

The Company is continuing to make efforts to expand the number of its operational contract programs and has contracted with a consulting firm managed by one of the Company’s previous directors to launch an aggressive marketing program.

Concurrent with its strategy for expanding its contract business, the Company is in the process of developing a home health division and acquiring strategic businesses with complimentary health care services. During 2002, the Company acquired two temporary staffing businesses. Revenues from those two entities comprise approximately 23% of consolidated annual revenues. The Company has identified other acquisition candidates and intends to continue to pursue this line of business.

The Company’s contract business has a dependence on a small customer base, presently consisting of three hospitals. However, the temporary staffing services segment has a fairly large customer base consisting of approximately 60 active hospitals. The Company has a significant amount of variable expenses associated with the production of its revenues, although certain fixed costs do exist. To that end, the loss of certain customers could have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s profit margin. The Company expects a loss from business operations for 2003, should no new contract programs be obtained and no acquisitions of temporary staffing business occur. As a result, there is a special emphasis paragraph in the report of the Company’s independent auditors of the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

Fiscal Year 2001 Compared to Fiscal Year 2000

The Company operated nine programs during the year ended December 31, 2001, and eleven programs during the year ended December 31, 2000. As of February 5, 2002, the Company had two inpatient and four partial hospitalization programs. Generally, the size and profit potential of inpatient programs are greater than partial hospitalization programs. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company’s net earnings from three inpatient programs exceeded net earnings from six operational partial hospitalization programs. Net revenues were $6,906,496 and $8,010,491 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The decrease in net revenues is due to the decrease in the number of programs, particularly one program which terminated in February of 2001.

Cost of services provided were $5,796,162 and $5,691,617 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is due to a variety of factors. Census increase caused one program’s expenses to significantly rise over the preceding year. In addition, the expensing of software to be used in an on-line counseling program also contributed to an increase in costs. Yet, the decrease in the number of operational programs, particularly one which terminated in February of 2001 substantially offset the increase in costs associated with operating programs among years.

17


Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,104,770 and $1,421,001 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The increase is primarily due to the forgiveness of debt, accrued interest receivable, short-term advances and the personal income taxes associated with these items to one officer of the Company.

The provision for uncollectible accounts were $9,865 and $340,009 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company provides for uncollectible accounts on a case by case basis. The provision for uncollectible accounts among periods relates to different programs which existed at December 31, 2001 versus 2000.

The Company’s income taxes have decreased in 2001 over 2000 due to the net loss generated by the Company in 2001.

Net loss was $(572,398) and net income was $391,686 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The loss was primarily due to decreasing revenue coupled with increasing cost of services provided and selling, general and administrative expenses.

ITEM 7A - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Immaterial.

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial Statements

     Our financial statements and related notes and schedules are contained on pages F-1 to F-19 of this report. The index to such items is included in Item 15(a)(i)

Quarterly Results

     The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly financial data for 2002 and 2001. In our opinion, this unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited information and includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the information set forth therein. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

18


Table of Contents

QUARTERLY DATA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                 
    3/31/02   6/30/02   9/30/02   12/31/02
   
 
 
 
Contract Revenues
  $ 1,388,758     $ 1,247,750     $ 756,573     $ 736,032  
Temporary Staffing Revenues
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 486,170     $ 750,997  
Net (Loss) Income
  ($ 126,152 )   $ 83,383     ($ 295,903 )   ($ 93,602 )
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock
  ($ 0.02 )   $ 0.01     ($ 0.05 )   ($ 0.02 )
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock
  ($ 0.02 )   $ 0.01     ($ 0.05 )   ($ 0.02 )

QUARTERLY DATA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
                                 
    3/31/01   6/30/01   9/30/01   12/31/01
   
 
 
 
Contract Revenues
  $ 2,061,590     $ 1,892,294     $ 1,888,493     $ 1,064,119  
Temporary Staffing Revenues
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
Net (Loss) Income
  $ 175,545     $ 189,453     $ 196,131     ($ 1,133,527 )
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock
  $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     ($ 0.19 )
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock
  $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     ($ 0.19 )

ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Inapplicable.

19


Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10 - DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

(a) and (b) Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

The directors and executive officers of the Company are:

             
Name   Age   Position

 
 
Edward A. Johnson     57     Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board
Mulumebet G. Michael     54     Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
Gary L. Dreher     56     Director
Michael S. Callison     64     Director
Peter C. McMahon     54     Director

Each director serves for a term of one year or until his successor has been elected and qualified. Each executive officer serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Mr. Dreher receives compensation of $1,000 per month for his service on the Audit Committee. No other directors receive any director’s fees or other compensation for their services, as such, but receive reimbursement for their expenses in attending meetings of the Board of Directors.

(c) Identification of Certain Significant Employees

Inapplicable.

(d) Family Relationships

Inapplicable.

(e) Business Experience

Edward A. Johnson - Chairman & CEO

Mr. Johnson has spent almost his entire professional career in behavioral healthcare services and co-founded OptimumCare in 1986. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Johnson has overall responsibility for developing strategic program direction with the firm’s current and future healthcare providers at hospitals, medical centers and community care centers. He also monitors and evaluates trends shaping the healthcare industry that will impact the Company. In response, from this larger perspective, he fashions policies, procedures and systems to maximize patient service while enhancing profitability for OptimumCare and value for its shareholders. Mr.

20


Table of Contents

Johnson received an M.S. degree in psychology and a B.A. degree in business from Colorado State College. He is also licensed in California as a Marriage and Family Counselor.

Mulumebet G. Michael - President, COO & Board Member

Ms. Michael joined OptimumCare in 1993 as a Program Administrator, advanced to Executive Vice President and COO in 1997, and was named President and a member of the Board of Directors in June 1998. Ms. Michael’s extensive experience both as a registered nurse and in behavioral healthcare management over a nineteen year career has provided superb insight, vision and knowledge, ensuring the best behavioral health practices are incorporated into each OptimumCare program. She manages the Company’s staff of more than 100 professionals and support personnel. Ms. Michael completed a four-year nursing school curriculum leading to her being a licensed nurse (RN) in three countries: America, Canada and Ethiopia. She also completed a three-year advanced hospital management program with the British Columbia Institute of Technology in Canada.

Gary L. Dreher - Director

Mr. Dreher was elected to the Board of Directors during September 1993. He received his B.S. degree in Microbiology and Lab Technology from California State University in 1971. He is President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of AMDL, an inventor and marketer of state-of-the-art diagnostic kits. AMDL is a public company traded on the American Stock Exchange. Prior to this, Mr. Dreher was President of Medical Market International, a marketing and management services company he co-founded. Mr. Dreher also served as Vice President of International Sales for Apotex Scientific, an international distributor network for Esoteric Diagnostic Tests, from 1992 to 1996. Mr. Dreher has 30 years experience in the healthcare industry.

Michael Callison - Director

Mr. Callison was elected to the Board of Directors in September 1993. From 1990 to 1999, he was responsible for sales and business development, as well as seeking out and nurturing relationships with strategic alliance partners to help the Company expand its services and coverage area. His 41 years of healthcare experience began while he attended college and worked as a psychiatric technician at a Washington state veteran’s hospital. Thereafter, he held positions of increasing responsibility primarily in sales and marketing with Pfizer Labs, Borg Warner Healthcare and Hill-Rom, a hospital architectural and furnishing company. Mr. Callison received his B.A. degree in Economics from the University of Puget Sound.

Peter C. McMahon - Director

Mr. McMahon was elected to the Board of Directors during November 2002. Mr. McMahon has practiced for over 26 years with an emphasis on business litigation and estate planning. Representative clients include Fortune 500 Companies and numerous high net worth individuals. Mr. McMahon practices in Laguna Beach, California with the firm of McMahon and McMahon. Mr. McMahon received his B.A. degree from University of California, Santa Barbara and his Law degree from Western State University