Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549-1004

FORM 10-K

[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002
or
[   ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission File No. 1-13146

THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 200
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(503) 684-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [   ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates on October 31, 2002 (based on the closing price of such shares on such date) was approximately $31,000,000.

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock on October 31, 2002 was 14,121,132, par value $0.001 per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Parts of Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated November 27, 2002 prepared in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on January 7, 2003 are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III of this Report.

Table of Contents

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Form 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I.

Forward-Looking Statements

From time to time, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (“Greenbrier” or the “Company”) or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, statements as to expectations, beliefs, and strategies regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements may be included in, but not limited to, press releases, oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, or various filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and include statements relating to:

•		availability of financing sources and borrowing base for working capital, other business development activities, capital spending, and railcar syndication activities;
•		ability to renew or obtain sufficient lines of credit on acceptable terms;
•		ability to successfully recapitalize European operations;
•		continuation of the joint venture in Mexico;
•		increased stockholder value;
•		increased competition;
•		market improvement in North America;
•		share of new and existing markets;
•		increase or decrease in production;
•		increased railcar services business;
•		continued ability to negotiate bank waivers;
•		ability to utilize beneficial tax strategies;
•		ability to obtain adequate certification and licensing of products; and
•		short- and long-term revenue and earnings effects of the above items.

These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors outside Greenbrier’s control. The following are among the factors, particularly in North America and Europe, that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:

•		a delay or failure of acquisitions, products, or services to compete successfully;
•		recapitalization of European operations for terms less favorable than anticipated;
•		decreases in carrying value of assets due to impairment;
•		severance or other costs or charges associated with lay-offs, shutdowns, or reducing the size and scope of operations;
•		increased cost of mobilizing for production following plant closures;
•		effects of local statutory accounting conventions on compliance with covenants in loan agreements or reporting of financial conditions or results of operations;
•		actual future costs and the availability of materials and a trained workforce;
•		changes in product mix and the mix between manufacturing and leasing & services revenue;
•		labor disputes or operating difficulties that might disrupt manufacturing operations or the flow of cargo;
•		production difficulties and product delivery delays as a result of, among other matters, changing technologies or non-performance of sub-contractors or suppliers;
•		ability to obtain suitable contracts for the sale of leased equipment;
•		lower than anticipated residual values for leased equipment;
•		discovery of defects in railcars resulting in increased warranty cost or litigation;
•		resolution or outcome of pending litigation;
•		the ability to consummate expected sales;
•		delays in receipt of orders, risks that contracts may be canceled during their term or not renewed, and risks that customers may not purchase as much equipment under the contracts as anticipated;
•		financial condition of principal customers;
•		market acceptance of products;
•		competitive factors, including increased competition, introduction of competitive products, and price pressures;
•		industry overcapacity;
•		shifts in market demand;
•		domestic and global business conditions and growth or reduction in the surface transportation industry;
•		domestic and global political, regulatory, or economic conditions including such matters as terrorism, war, or embargoes;
•		the effect of car hire deprescription on leasing revenue;
•		changes in interest rates;
•		changes in fuel and/or energy prices;

3

Table of Contents

•		commodity price fluctuations;
•		ability to replace maturing lease revenue with revenue from growth of the lease fleet and management services; and
•		economic impacts from currency fluctuations in the Company’s worldwide operations.

Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. Greenbrier assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements or if Greenbrier later becomes aware that these assumptions are not likely to be achieved.

Additional Information

Greenbrier is a reporting company and files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Stockholders may inspect and copy these materials at the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. Copies of the Company’s annual, quarterly and special reports will be available to stockholders without charge upon request to: Investor Relations, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 200, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035.

Item 1. BUSINESS

Introduction

Greenbrier is a leading supplier of transportation equipment and services to the railroad and related industries. With operations in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, the manufacturing segment produces double-stack intermodal railcars, conventional railcars, marine vessels and industrial forgings, and performs repair and refurbishment activities for both intermodal and conventional railcars. In addition to manufacturing, Greenbrier is engaged in complementary leasing & services activities. As of August 31, 2002, the lease fleet consists of approximately 50,000 owned or managed railcars. Greenbrier believes this fleet is among the larger non-railroad owned fleets in North America.

In August 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors committed to a plan to recapitalize operations in Europe, which consist of a railcar manufacturing plant in Swidnica, Poland and a railcar sales, design, and engineering operation in Siegen, Germany. The European operations have not met expectations for profitability nor return on capital invested resulting in the decision to discontinue those operations and refocus resources on North American operations. The Company is currently pursuing several options for recapitalization of European operations which include discussions with strategic investors, financial investors and members of European management and will proceed with the option that the Board of Directors believes will be most beneficial to Greenbrier’s shareholders. European operations are treated as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes and accordingly are not included in any discussions of continuing operations.

Greenbrier is a Delaware corporation formed in 1981. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 200, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035, and its telephone number is (503) 684-7000.

Products and Services

Greenbrier currently operates in two primary business segments: manufacturing and leasing & services. The two business segments are operationally integrated. With operations in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, the manufacturing segment produces double-stack intermodal railcars, conventional railcars, marine vessels and forged steel products and performs railcar refurbishment and maintenance activities. The leasing & services segment owns or manages approximately 50,000 railcars for railroads, institutional investors, and other leasing companies. In addition, the Company has operations in Europe that consists of a manufacturing facility and sales, design, and engineering office, which are being reported as discontinued operations.

Manufacturing

Intermodal Railcars

Intermodal transportation is the movement of cargo in standardized containers or trailers. Intermodal containers and trailers are generally freely interchangeable among railcar, truck, or ship, making it possible to move cargo in a single container or trailer from a point of origin to its final destination without the repeated loading and unloading of freight required by traditional shipping methods. A major innovation in intermodal transportation has been the articulated double-stack railcar, which transports stacked containers on a single platform. An articulated railcar is a unit comprised of up to five platforms, each of which is linked by a common set of wheels and axles.

4

Table of Contents

The double-stack railcar provides significant operating and capital savings over other types of intermodal railcars. These savings are the result of (i) increased train density (two containers are carried within the same longitudinal space conventionally used to carry one trailer or container); (ii) a railcar weight reduction per container of approximately 50%; (iii) easier terminal handling characteristics; (iv) reduced equipment costs of approximately 30% over the cost of providing the same carrying capacity with conventional equipment; (v) better ride quality leading to reduced damage claims; and (vi) increased fuel efficiency resulting from weight reduction and improved aerodynamics. Greenbrier is the leading manufacturer of double-stack railcars with an estimated cumulative North American market share of approximately 60%.

Greenbrier’s comprehensive line of articulated and non-articulated double-stack railcars offers varying load capacities and configurations. Current double-stack products include:

Maxi-Stack® — The Maxi-Stack is a series of double-stack railcars that features the ride-quality and operating efficiency of articulated stack cars. The Maxi-Stack IV is a three-platform articulated railcar with 53-foot wells that can accommodate all current container sizes in all three wells. The Maxi-Stack I is a five-platform railcar with 40-foot wells that can carry either 20-foot or 40-foot containers in the wells with the ability to handle any size of container, up to 53-feet in length, on the top level. The Maxi-Stack AP is a three-platform all-purpose railcar that is more versatile than other intermodal cars because it allows the loading of either trailers or double-stack containers on the same platform.

Husky-Stack® — The Husky-Stack is a non-articulated (stand-alone) or draw bar connected series of double-stack railcars with the capability of carrying containers up to 42% heavier than a single Maxi-Stack platform. The All-Purpose Husky-Stack is a non-articulated version of the Maxi-Stack AP. Husky-Stack also provides a means to extend double-stack economics to small load segments and terminals.

Conventional Railcars

As a leading manufacturer of boxcars in North America, Greenbrier produces a wide variety of 110-ton capacity boxcars, which are used in the forest products, automotive, and general merchandise applications. In addition to boxcars, center partition cars, bulkhead flat cars, flat cars for automotive transportation, waste service flat cars, and various other conventional railcar types are manufactured. Greenbrier also produces a variety of covered hopper cars for the grain, cement, and plastics industries as well as gondolas and coil cars for the steel and metals markets. In December 2002, the Company will begin delivery of a variation on its traditional center partition design, the high capacity drop-deck center partition car. This railcar provides for significantly increased load factors as well as design features to reduce lading damage and enhance safety for load/unload personnel.

Rail Services — Repair and Refurbishment

Greenbrier is actively engaged in the repair and refurbishment of railcars for third parties, as well as its own leased and managed fleet. In certain situations, repair or refurbishment of the Company’s lease fleet is performed at unaffiliated facilities. Refurbishment and repair facilities are located in Portland and Springfield, Oregon; Cleburne and San Antonio, Texas; Finley, Washington; Atchison, Kansas; Golden, Colorado; Modesto, California; and Willow Springs, Illinois. In addition, Greenbrier has wheel reconditioning shops located in Portland, Oregon; Pine Bluff, Arkansas; Tacoma, Washington; and Sahagun, Mexico.

Greenbrier’s involvement in a major long-term wheel program with Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) and a maintenance program with The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) has provided a substantial base of work.

Marine Vessel Fabrication

The Portland, Oregon manufacturing facility, located on a deep water port on the Willamette River, includes marine facilities with the largest side-launch ways on the West Coast. The marine facilities also enhance steel plate burning and fabrication capacity providing flexibility for railcar production. Types of vessels manufactured include conventional deck barges, double-hull tank barges, railcar/deck barges, barges for aggregates and other heavy industrial products, and ocean-going dump barges. Recent deliveries of double-hull tank barges meet the requirements of The Oil Pollution Act of 1990.

Forging

Steel forgings weighing up to 100 tons are produced at the Nova Scotia industrial forge facility, one of the largest in North America. The forge produces custom parts for the oil and gas, hydroelectric and other heavy industries for customers in all parts of the world.

Leasing & Services

Greenbrier currently manages a fleet of approximately 50,000 railcars in North America, of which approximately 30% are owned with the remainder managed for institutional investors, railroads, and other leasing companies. Management services include equipment marketing and re-marketing, maintenance management, accounting,

5

Table of Contents

and administration. Greenbrier participates in both the finance and the operating lease segments of the market. Lease payments received under the non-cancelable lease terms of direct finance leases generally cover substantially all of the equipment cost. The aggregate non-cancelable rental payments for equipment placed under operating leases do not fully amortize the acquisition costs of the leased equipment. As a result, the Company is subject to the customary risk that it may not be able to sell or re-lease equipment after the operating lease term expires. However, the Company believes it can effectively manage the risks typically associated with operating leases due to its railcar expertise and its refurbishing and re-marketing capabilities. Most of the leases are “full service” leases, whereby Greenbrier is responsible for maintenance, taxes, and administration. The fleet is maintained, in part, through Greenbrier’s own facilities and engineering and technical staff.

Greenbrier manages the cost of maintenance and ensures cars are available for service under a multi-year maintenance agreement for 7,000 railcars owned by BNSF. Much of the preventative maintenance is performed at our rail services facilities.

Assets from the owned lease fleet are periodically sold to take advantage of market conditions, manage risk, and maintain liquidity.

The following table summarizes the lease fleet:

A substantial portion of the owned equipment in the lease fleet has been acquired through an agreement entered into in August 1990 with Southern Pacific Transportation Company, which has since merged with Union Pacific, to purchase and refurbish approximately 10,000 railcars between 1990 and 1997. The railcars were refurbished by Greenbrier or unaffiliated contract shops and placed on predominantly 10-year finance leases with Union Pacific. The leases contain a fixed-price purchase option exercisable upon lease expiration. Union Pacific has exercised the purchase option on approximately 2,700 railcars through August 31, 2002 and has notified Greenbrier of their intention to exercise this option on all remaining railcars in this program.

Discontinued operations

As previously discussed, the Company’s Board of Directors committed to a plan to recapitalize operations in Europe, which consist of a railcar manufacturing plant in Poland and a railcar sales, design, and engineering operation in Germany. The European product line, manufactured at the Polish facility and through a network of subcontractors, includes a comprehensive line of pressurized tank cars for liquid petroleum gas (LPG) and ammonia and non-pressurized tank cars for light oil, chemicals, and other products. A broad range of other types of freight cars, including flat cars, coil steel cars, coal cars, sliding wall cars, and rolling highway wagons are also manufactured.

Raw Materials and Components

Products manufactured at Greenbrier facilities require a supply of raw materials including steel and numerous specialty components such as brakes, wheels, and axles. Approximately 50% of the cost of each freight car represents specialty components purchased from third parties. Customers often specify particular components and suppliers of such components. Although the number of alternative suppliers of certain specialty components has declined in recent years, there are at least two suppliers for most such components. Inventory levels are continually monitored to ensure adequate support of production. Advance purchases are periodically made to avoid possible shortages of material due to capacity limitations of component suppliers and possible price increases. Binding long-term contracts with suppliers are not typically entered into as the Company relies on established relationships with major suppliers to ensure the availability of raw materials and specialty items. Fluctuations in the price of components and raw

6

Table of Contents

materials have not had a material effect on earnings and are not anticipated to have a material effect in the foreseeable future.

In 2002, approximately 50% of domestic requirements for steel were purchased from Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. and approximately 43% of the Canadian requirements were purchased from Algoma Steel, Inc. The top ten suppliers for all inventory purchases accounted for approximately 28% of total purchases, of which no supplier accounted for more than 10%. The Company maintains good relationships with its suppliers and has not experienced any significant interruptions in recent years in the supply of raw materials or specialty components.

In Europe, which is classified as discontinued operations, approximately 28% of European steel requirements were purchased from Kons-met, a Polish company.

Marketing and Product Development

A fully-integrated marketing and sales effort is utilized whereby Greenbrier seeks to leverage relationships developed in each of its manufacturing and leasing & services segments to provide customers with a diverse range of equipment and financing alternatives designed to satisfy a customer’s unique needs. These custom programs may involve a combination of railcar products and financing, leasing, refurbishing, and re-marketing services, depending on whether the customer is buying new equipment, refurbishing existing equipment, or seeking to outsource the maintenance or management of equipment.

Through customer relationships, insights are derived into the potential need for new products and services. Marketing and engineering personnel collaborate to evaluate opportunities and identify and develop new products. Research and development costs incurred for new product development for continuing operations during 2002, 2001, and 2000 were $1.0 million, $1.5 million, and $1.3 million. Discontinued European operations incurred research and development costs during 2002, 2001, and 2000 of $2.2 million, $1.9 million, and $1.0 million.

Customers and Backlog

Manufacturing and leasing & services customers include Class I railroads, regional and short-line railroads, other leasing companies, shippers, carriers, and other transportation companies.

The Company’s backlog as of:

The backlog is based on customer purchase or lease orders that the Company believes are firm. Customer orders, however, may be subject to cancellation and other customary industry terms and conditions. Historically, little variation has been experienced between the number of railcars ordered and the number of railcars actually sold. The backlog is not necessarily indicative of future results of operations. Payment for railcars manufactured is typically received when the railcars are completed and accepted by a third-party customer.

In 2002, revenues from the two largest customers, BNSF and Union Pacific, accounted for approximately 34% and 7% of total revenues from continuing operations. Revenues from BNSF accounted for 31% of manufacturing revenues. Revenues from Union Pacific and BNSF accounted for approximately 24% and 19% of leasing & services revenues. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of total, manufacturing or leasing & services revenues.

Competition

Greenbrier is affected by a variety of competitors in each of its principal business activities. There are currently six major railcar manufacturers competing in North America. Two of these producers build railcars principally for their own fleets and four producers — Trinity Industries, Inc., Johnstown America Corp., National Steel Car, Ltd., and the Company — compete principally in the general railcar market. Some of these producers have substantially greater resources than the Company. Greenbrier competes on the basis of type of product, reputation for quality, price, reliability of delivery, and customer service and support.

7

Table of Contents

In railcar leasing, principal competitors in North America include Bombardier Rail Capital, The CIT Group, First Union Rail, GATX Corporation, and General Electric Railcar Services.

Patents and Trademarks

Greenbrier pursues a proactive program for protection of intellectual property resulting from its research and development efforts and has obtained patent and trademark protection for significant intellectual property as it relates to its manufacturing business. The Company holds several United States and foreign patents of varying duration and has several patent applications pending.

Environmental Matters

The Company is subject to national, state, provincial, and local environmental laws and regulations concerning, among other matters, air emissions, wastewater discharge, solid and hazardous waste disposal, and employee health and safety. Greenbrier maintains an active program of environmental compliance and believes that its current operations are in material compliance with all applicable national, state, provincial, and local environmental laws and regulations. Prior to acquiring manufacturing facilities, the Company conducts investigations to evaluate the environmental condition of subject properties and negotiates contractual terms for allocation of environmental exposure arising from prior uses. Upon commencing operations at acquired facilities, the Company endeavors to implement environmental practices, which are at least as stringent as those mandated by applicable laws and regulations.

Environmental studies have been conducted of owned and leased properties that indicate additional investigation and some remediation may be necessary. The Portland, Oregon manufacturing facility is located on the Willamette River. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) has classified portions of the river bed, including the portion fronting the facility, as a federal “national priority list” or “superfund” site due to sediment contamination. The Company and more than 60 other parties have received a “General Notice” of potential liability from the EPA. There is no indication that the Company has contributed to contamination of the Willamette River bed, although uses by prior owners of the property may have contributed. Nevertheless, this classification of the Willamette River may have an impact on the value of the Company’s investment in the property and has resulted in the Company initially bearing a portion of the cost of an EPA mandated remedial investigation. The cost of the investigation is currently not determinable. However, some or all of any such outlay may be recoverable from responsible parties. The Company may be required to perform periodic maintenance dredging in order to continue to launch vessels from its launch ways on the river, and classification as a superfund site could result in some limitations on future dredging and launch activity. The outcome of such actions cannot be estimated. Management believes that the Company’s operations adhere to sound environmental practices, applicable laws and regulations.

Regulation

The Federal Railroad Administration (the FRA) in the United States and Transport Canada in Canada administer and enforce laws and regulations relating to railroad safety. These regulations govern equipment and safety appliance standards for freight cars and other rail equipment used in interstate commerce. The Association of American Railroads (the AAR) promulgates a wide variety of rules and regulations governing the safety and design of equipment, relationships among railroads with respect to railcars in interchange, and other matters. The AAR also certifies railcar builders and component manufacturers that provide equipment for use on North American railroads. The effect of these regulations is that the Company must maintain its certifications with the AAR as a railcar builder and component manufacturer, and products sold and leased by the Company in North America must meet AAR, Transport Canada, and FRA standards.

In Europe, many countries have deregulated their railroads, and the privatization process is underway. However, each country currently has its own regulatory body with different certification requirements.

Executive Officers of the Company

The following are the executive officers of the Company:

Alan James, 72, is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Greenbrier, a position he has held since 1994. Mr. James was President of Greenbrier, or its predecessor company, from 1974 to 1994.

William A. Furman, 58, is President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Greenbrier, positions he has held since 1994. Mr. Furman is also Managing Director of TrentonWorks Limited, a manufacturing subsidiary. Mr. Furman was Chief Executive Officer of Gunderson Inc., a manufacturing subsidiary, from 1990 to 2000 and was Vice President of Greenbrier, or its predecessor company, from 1974 to 1994. Mr. Furman serves as a director of Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., a steel recycling and manufacturing company.

8

Table of Contents

C. Bruce Ward, 72, is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Gunderson Inc. and has served as a director of the Company since 1994. Mr. Ward has served as Chairman of Gunderson Inc. since 1990 and was President and Chief Executive Officer from 1985 to 1989. Mr. Ward serves as a director of Stimson Lumber Company, a privately-held forest products company.

A. Daniel O’Neal, 66, has been a director of Gunderson Inc. since 1985 and has served as a director of the Company since 1994. From 1973 until 1980, Mr. O’Neal served as a commissioner of the Interstate Commerce Commission and, from 1977 until 1980, served as Chairman. From 1989 until 1996, he was Chief Executive Officer and owner of a freight transportation services company. He has been Chairman of Washington State’s Freight Mobility Board since being appointed by the Governor in 1998.

Robin D. Bisson, 48, has been Senior Vice President Marketing and Sales since 1996 and President of Greenbrier Railcar, Inc., a subsidiary that engages in railcar leasing, since 1991. Mr. Bisson was Vice President of Greenbrier Railcar, Inc. from 1987 to 1991 and has been Vice President of Greenbrier Leasing Corporation, a subsidiary that engages in railcar leasing, since 1987.

William L. Bourque, 55, has held the position of Vice President International Marketing since April 1999. Prior to that appointment, he served as Vice President Marketing of Greenbrier Leasing Corporation and Vice President of Greenbrier Intermodal. Mr. Bourque has been with Greenbrier since 1986 and was formerly employed by Southern Pacific Transportation Company.

Larry G. Brady, 63, is Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Prior to becoming Senior Vice President in 1998, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 1994. Mr. Brady has been Senior Vice President of Greenbrier Leasing Corporation since he joined the Company in 1991. From 1974 to 1990, he was a partner with Touche Ross & Co. (which subsequently became Deloitte & Touche LLP).

Mark J. Rittenbaum, 45, is Senior Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, a position he has held since 2001. Prior to becoming Senior Vice President, he was Vice President and Treasurer since 1994. Mr. Rittenbaum is also Vice President of Greenbrier Leasing Corporation and Greenbrier Railcar, Inc., positions he has held since 1993 and 1994.

James T. Sharp, 48, has been Vice President of Marketing and Operations of the Company since 1999 and was Vice President of Sales from 1996 to 1999. Prior to his service with the Company, Mr. Sharp was Vice President of Sales at USL Capital, a railcar leasing subsidiary of Ford Motor Co.

Timothy A. Stuckey, 52, has been President of Gunderson Rail Services Inc., the repair and refurbishment subsidiary, since May 1999, prior to which he served as Assistant Vice President of Greenbrier Leasing Corporation since 1987.

Norriss M. Webb, 62, is Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company, a position he has held since 1994. He is also Vice President, Secretary, and a director of Gunderson Inc. Mr. Webb was Vice President of the Company from 1981 to 1994.

L. Clark Wood, 60, has been President of Manufacturing Operations since April 1998, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Gunderson Inc. since 2000, and Chief Executive Officer of TrentonWorks Limited since June 1995. Mr. Wood was President of Gunderson from 1990 to 1999 and was Vice President and Director of Railcar Sales at Trinity Industries, Inc., a railroad freight car manufacturer, from 1985 to 1990.

Executive officers are designated by the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of the executive officers of the Company. Mr. James and Mr. Furman have entered into a Stockholders’ Agreement, which expires in July 2004, pursuant to which they have agreed, among other things, to vote as directors to elect Mr. Furman as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. James as Chairman of the Board of Directors, and certain persons as executive officers and each to vote for the other and for the remaining existing directors in electing directors of the Company.

Employees

As of August 31, 2002, Greenbrier had 2,287 full-time employees engaged in continuing operations, consisting of 2,194 employees in railcar and marine manufacturing and railcar services, and 93 employees in leasing & services activities. A total of 648 employees at the manufacturing facility in Trenton, Nova Scotia, Canada are covered by collective bargaining agreements. As of August 2002, 762 employees were engaged in discontinued European operations. At the manufacturing facility in Swidnica, Poland, 365 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements that can be terminated by either party with three months notice. A stock incentive plan and a stock purchase plan are available for all North American employees. A discretionary bonus program is maintained for salaried and most hourly employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements. Greenbrier believes that its relations with its employees are generally good.

9

Table of Contents

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Company operates at the following facilities in North America and Europe as of August 31, 2002:

Description

Marketing, administrative offices and other facilities are also leased in various locations throughout North America and Europe. Greenbrier believes that its facilities are in good condition and that the facilities, together with anticipated capital improvements and additions, are adequate to meet its operating needs for the foreseeable future. The need for expansion and upgrading of the railcar manufacturing and refurbishment facilities is continually evaluated in order to remain competitive and to take advantage of market opportunities.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, Greenbrier is involved as a defendant in litigation in the ordinary course of business, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with certainty. The most significant litigation is as follows.

Litigation was initiated in 1998 in the Ontario Court of Justice in Toronto, Ontario by former shareholders of Interamerican Logistics, Inc. (Interamerican), which was acquired in the fall of 1996. The plaintiffs allege that Greenbrier violated the agreements pursuant to which it acquired ownership of Interamerican and seek damages aggregating $4.5 million Canadian.

Litigation was initiated in November 2001 in the Superior Court of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia by a customer, BC Rail Partnership, alleging breach of contract and negligent manufacture and design of railcars which were involved in a derailment. Damages have not been quantified.

Litigation was initiated in August 2002 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware by National Steel Car, Ltd. (NSC), a competitor, alleging that a drop-deck center partition railcar being marketed and sold by Greenbrier violates a NSC

10

Table of Contents

patent. Related litigation was also brought at the same time in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by NSC against a Greenbrier customer, Canadian Pacific Railway. Greenbrier has assumed the defense on that action.

Management contends all the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend its position. Accordingly, management believes that any ultimate liability resulting from the above litigation will not materially affect the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Greenbrier’s common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol GBX since July 14, 1994. There were approximately 500 holders of record of common stock as of October 31, 2002. The following table shows the reported high and low sales price of Greenbrier’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange.

A dividend of $.06 per share was declared in November 2001 and paid in December 2001. No other dividends were paid during the fiscal year. Cash dividends of $.09 per share were paid quarterly in 2001. There is no assurance as to the payment of future dividends as they are dependent upon future earnings, capital requirements, and the financial condition of the Company.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information as of August 31, 2002 with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.

11

Table of Contents

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31,