| X | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. |
OR
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________________ to _________________ Commission File Number 1-11530 |
| Michigan | 38-2033632 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| 200 East Long Lake Road | |
| Suite 300, P.O. Box 200 | |
| Bloomfield Hills, Michigan | 48303-0200 |
| (Address of principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (248) 258-6800 |
| Name of each exchange | |
| Title of each class | on which registered |
| Common Stock, | New York Stock Exchange |
| $0.01 Par Value | |
| 8.3% Series A Cumulative | New York Stock Exchange |
| Redeemable Preferred Stock, | |
| $0.01 Par Value |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such report(s)) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| X | Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |
| Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes X No |
As of March 5, 2004, the aggregate market value of the 49,724,783 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1.2 billion, based upon the closing price $24.68 on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date. (For this computation, the registrant has excluded the market value of all shares of its Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the registrant and certain other shareholders; such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an "affiliate" of the registrant.) As of March 5, 2003, there were outstanding 50,456,343 shares of Common Stock.
Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting to be held in 2003 are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS.
The Company
Taubman Centers, Inc. (we, us, our, or TCO) was incorporated in Michigan in 1973 and had our initial public offering (IPO) in 1992. We own a 61% managing general partners interest in The Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership or TRG), through which we conduct all of our operations.
We are engaged in the ownership, development, acquisition, and operation of regional shopping centers and interests therein. Our portfolio, as of December 31, 2003, included 21 urban and suburban centers located in nine states. One new center is under construction in North Carolina and is scheduled to open September 15, 2005. The Operating Partnership also owns certain regional retail shopping center development projects and more than 99% of The Taubman Company LLC (the Manager), which manages the shopping centers and provides other services to the Operating Partnership and to us. See the table on page 10 of this report for information regarding the centers.
We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). In order to satisfy the provisions of the Code applicable to REITs, we must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income and meet certain other requirements. The Operating Partnerships partnership agreement provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute, at a minimum, sufficient amounts to its partners such that our pro rata share will enable us to pay shareholder dividends (including capital gains dividends that may be required upon the Operating Partnerships sale of an asset) that will satisfy the REIT provisions of the Code.
Recent Developments
For a discussion of business developments that occurred in 2003, see Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).
The Shopping Center Business
There are several types of retail shopping centers, varying primarily by size and marketing strategy. Retail shopping centers range from neighborhood centers of less than 100,000 square feet of GLA to regional and super-regional shopping centers. Retail shopping centers in excess of 400,000 square feet of GLA are generally referred to as regional shopping centers, while those centers having in excess of 800,000 square feet of GLA are generally referred to as super-regional shopping centers. Nineteen of our centers are super-regional centers. In this annual report on Form 10-K, the term regional shopping centers refers to both regional and super-regional shopping centers. The term GLA refers to gross retail space, including anchors and mall tenant areas, and the term Mall GLA refers to gross retail space, excluding anchors. The term anchor refers to a department store or other large retail store. The term mall tenants refers to stores (other than anchors) that are typically specialty retailers and lease space in shopping centers.
Business of the Company
We, as managing general partner of the Operating Partnership, are engaged in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition, development, and expansion of regional shopping centers.
The centers:
| o | are strategically located in major metropolitan areas, many in communities that are among the most affluent in the country, including New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Detroit, Phoenix, Miami, Dallas, Tampa, Orlando, and Washington, D.C.; |
| o | range in size between 232,000 and 1.6 million square feet of GLA and between 124,000 and 640,000 square feet of Mall GLA. The smallest center has approximately 40 stores, and the largest has over 200 stores. Of the 21 centers, 19 are super-regional shopping centers; |
| o | have approximately 2,900 stores operated by its mall tenants under approximately 1,200 trade names; |
| o | have 66 anchors, operating under 17 trade names; |
| o | lease most of Mall GLA to national chains, including subsidiaries or divisions of The Limited (The Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret, and others), Gap (Gap, Gap Kids, Banana Republic, and others), and Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, Champs Sports, and others); and |
| o | are among the most productive (measured by mall tenants average per square foot sales) in the United States. In 2003, mall tenants had average per square foot sales of $468, which is significantly greater than the average for all regional shopping centers owned by public companies. |
The most important factor affecting the revenues generated by the centers is leasing to mall tenants (primarily specialty retailers), which represents approximately 90% of revenues. Anchors account for less than 10% of revenues because many own their stores and, in general, those that lease their stores do so at rates substantially lower than those in effect for mall tenants.
Our portfolio is concentrated in highly productive super-regional shopping centers. Of the 21 centers, 20 had annual rent rolls at December 31, 2003 of over $10 million. We believe that this level of productivity is indicative of the centers strong competitive position and is, in significant part, attributable to our business strategy and philosophy. We believe that large shopping centers (including regional and especially super-regional shopping centers) are the least susceptible to direct competition because (among other reasons) anchors and large specialty retail stores do not find it economically attractive to open additional stores in the immediate vicinity of an existing location for fear of competing with themselves. In addition to the advantage of size, we believe that the centers success can be attributed in part to their other physical characteristics, such as design, layout, and amenities.
Business Strategy And Philosophy
We believe that the regional shopping center business is not simply a real estate development business, but rather an operating business in which a retailing approach to the on-going management and leasing of the centers is essential. Thus we:
| o | offer a large, diverse selection of retail stores in each center to give customers a broad selection of consumer goods and variety of price ranges. |
| o | endeavor to increase overall mall tenants sales by leasing space to a constantly changing mix of tenants, thereby increasing achievable rents. |
| o | seek to anticipate trends in the retailing industry and emphasizes ongoing introductions of new retail concepts into our centers. Due in part to this strategy, a number of successful retail trade names have opened their first mall stores in the centers. In addition, we have brought to the centers new to the market retailers. We believe that the execution of this leasing strategy has been unique in the industry and is an important element in building and maintaining customer loyalty and increasing mall productivity. |
| o | provide innovative initiatives that utilize technology and the Internet to heighten the shopping experience, build customer loyalty and increase tenant sales. One such initiative is our Taubman Center Website Program, which connects shoppers and retailers through an interactive content-driven website and a robust direct email program. More than 98% of the managed centers tenants provide content on a weekly basis for the program. |
The centers compete for retail consumer spending through diverse, in-depth presentations of predominantly fashion merchandise in an environment intended to facilitate customer shopping. While some centers include stores that target high-end, upscale customers, each center is individually merchandised in light of the demographics of its potential customers within convenient driving distance.
Our leasing strategy involves assembling a diverse mix of mall tenants in each of the centers in order to attract customers, thereby generating higher sales by mall tenants. High sales by mall tenants make the centers attractive to prospective tenants, thereby increasing the rental rates that prospective tenants are willing to pay. We implement an active leasing strategy to increase the centers productivity and to set minimum rents at higher levels. Elements of this strategy include terminating leases of under-performing tenants, renegotiating existing leases, and not leasing space to prospective tenants that (though viable or attractive in certain ways) would not enhance a centers retail mix.
Potential For Growth
Our principal objective is to enhance shareholder value. We seek to maximize the financial results of our core assets, while also pursuing a growth strategy that primarily includes an active new center development program.
Internal Growth
We expect that 90% of our future growth will come from our existing core portfolio and business. Although weve always had a culture of intensively managing our assets and maximizing the rents from tenants, were committed to improving the processes that significantly impact the core portfolio in order to drive even better performance.
Our core business strategy is to maintain a portfolio of properties that deliver above-market profitable growth by providing targeted retailers with the best opportunity to do business in each market and targeted shoppers with the best local shopping experience for their needs.
We are working on three endeavors that we believe will lead to achievement of our key mission to deliver above market profitable growth. Our first endeavor is to become an even more customer centric company than we are today, which will enable us to make better decisions driven by a fact-based understanding of what retailers and shoppers want. Our second endeavor is to become more operationally excellent, which will enable us to achieve competitive cost efficiencies, greater discipline, and more timely processes and decision making. This is especially important as our competitors search for economies of scale in increasingly larger operations. Our third endeavor is to achieve profitable growth, which weve defined as maintaining the highest tenant sales and sales growth in the industry, and accelerating core operations growth over time. We believe further integrating these basic strategic themes throughout the organization will serve to coordinate and prioritize all of our efforts to achieve our strategy.
Weve identified the key drivers to achieve our core business strategy. These drivers fall into four categories: people drivers, organizational drivers, customer drivers and financial drivers. These drivers served as a basis for the companywide initiatives we worked on in 2003 and that we believe will establish a strong foundation for improved core performance. We made progress on our initiatives, including the implementation of a new lease process software package in 2003, which will help reduce the time between a tenant leaving a space and a new tenant paying rent in that space. In addition, in a year which weve experienced significant early tenant terminations, weve worked to maximize income by increasing the number of temporary tenants. Also, weve made improvements to our tenant grading system to ensure that the system is a strong predictor of a new tenants ability to pay contract rent for its entire term and to establish risk parameters for each asset to guide our leasing team. Were continuing to work on these and other initiatives to improve core performance.
We strongly believe that focusing management attention on these initiatives will improve our performance on these drivers and by establishing specific benchmarks and goals for these drivers, which we can measure year after year, we will have set the stage for future strong core operations growth.
Development of New Centers
We are pursuing an active program of regional shopping center development. We believe that we have the expertise to develop economically attractive regional shopping centers through intensive analysis of local retail opportunities. We believe that the development of new centers is an important use of our capital and an area in which we excel. At any time, we have numerous potential development projects in various stages.
The Mall at Millenia, a 1.1 million square foot center in which the Operating Partnership has a 50% interest, opened in October 2002 in Orlando, Florida.
Stony Point Fashion Park, a 665,000 square foot wholly-owned center, opened September 18, 2003 in Richmond, Virginia.
Northlake Mall, a 1.1 million square foot wholly-owned center in Charlotte, North Carolina is currently under construction and is scheduled to open September 15, 2005.
Our approximately $34.2 million balance of development pre-construction costs as of December 31, 2003 consists of costs relating to our Oyster Bay project in Syosset, New York. Refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Planned Capital Spending regarding the status of this project.
Our policies with respect to development activities are designed to reduce the risks associated with development. We generally do not intend to acquire land early in the development process. Instead, we generally acquire options on land or form partnerships with landholders holding potentially attractive development sites. We typically exercise the options only once we are prepared to begin construction. The pre-construction phase for a regional center typically extends over several years and the time to obtain anchor commitments, zoning and regulatory approvals, and public financing arrangements can vary significantly from project to project. In addition, we do not intend to begin construction until a sufficient number of anchor stores have agreed to operate in the shopping center, such that we are confident that the projected sales and rents from Mall GLA are sufficient to earn a return on invested capital in excess of our cost of capital. Having historically followed these principles, our experience indicates that, on average, less than 10% of the costs of the development of a regional shopping center will be incurred prior to the construction period. However, no assurance can be given that we will continue to be able to so limit pre-construction costs. Unexpected costs due to extended zoning and regulatory processes may cause our investment in a project to exceed this historic experience.
While we will continue to evaluate development projects using criteria, including financial criteria for rates of return, similar to those employed in the past, no assurances can be given that the adherence to these policies will produce comparable results in the future. In addition, the costs of shopping center development opportunities that are explored but ultimately abandoned will, to some extent, diminish the overall return on development projects (see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Capital Spending for further discussion of our development activities).
Strategic Acquisitions
Our objective is to acquire existing centers only when they are compatible with the quality of our portfolio (or can be redeveloped to that level) and that satisfy our strategic plans and pricing requirements. During 2003 we acquired:
| o | a 25% interest in Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay in Naples, Florida. |
| o | an additional 25% interest in MacArthur Center, bringing our ownership in the shopping center to 95%. |
| o | the 15% minority interest in Great Lakes Crossing, bringing our ownership in the shopping center to 100%. |
Expansions of the Centers
Another potential element of growth is the strategic expansion of existing properties to update and enhance their market positions, by replacing or adding new anchor stores or increasing mall tenant space. Most of the centers have been designed to accommodate expansions. Expansion projects can be as significant as new shopping center construction in terms of scope and cost, requiring governmental and existing anchor store approvals, design and engineering activities, including rerouting utilities, providing additional parking areas or decking, acquiring additional land, and relocating anchors and mall tenants (all of which must take place with a minimum of disruption to existing tenants and customers).
The following table includes information regarding recent development, acquisition, and expansion activities:
| Developments: | ||
| Completion Date | Center | Location |
| March 2001 | Dolphin Mall | Miami, Florida |
| August 2001 | The Shops at Willow Bend | Plano, Texas |
| September 2001 | International Plaza | Tampa, Florida |
| October 2001 | The Mall at Wellington Green | Wellington, Florida |
| October 2002 | The Mall at Millenia | Orlando, Florida |
| September 2003 | Stony Point Fashion Park | Richmond, Virginia |
| Acquisitions: | ||
| Completion Date | Center | Location |
| August 2000 | Twelve Oaks Mall | Novi, Michigan |
| additional interest (1) | ||
| May 2002 | Sunvalley (2) | Concord, California |
| May 2002 | Arizona Mills | Tempe, Arizona |
| additional interest (3) | ||
| October 2002 | Dolphin Mall | Miami, Florida |
| additional interest (4) | ||
| March 2003 | Great Lakes Crossing | Auburn Hills, Michigan |
| additional interest (5) | ||
| July 2003 | MacArthur Center | Norfolk, Virginia |
| additional interest (6) | ||
| December 2003 | Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay (7) | Naples, Florida |
| Expansions and Renovations: | ||
| Completion Date | Center | Location |
| February 2000 - September 2000 | Fair Oaks (8) | Fairfax, Virginia |
| May 2000 | Fairlane (9) | Dearborn, Michigan |
| December 2000-2001 | Beverly Center (10) | Los Angeles, California |
| November 2001 | Twelve Oaks Mall (11) | Novi, Michigan |
| November 2001 | Woodland (11) | Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| November 2003 | The Mall at Short Hills (10) | Short Hills, New Jersey |
| December 2003 | Regency Square (10) | Richmond, Virginia |
| (1) | In August 2000, the joint venture partners 50% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (2) | In May 2002, a 50% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (3) | In May 2002, an additional 13% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (4) | In October 2002, the joint venture partners 50% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (5) | In March 2003, the joint venture partners 15% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (6) | In July 2003, an additional 25% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (7) | In December 2003, a 25% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (8) | Hechts opened an expansion in February. Additionally, a JCPenney expansion and newly constructed Macys opened in September. |
| (9) | A 21-screen theater opened. |
| (10) | Renovation completed. |
| (11) | New food court opened. |
Rental Rates
As leases have expired in the centers, we have generally been able to rent the available space, either to the existing tenant or a new tenant, at rental rates that are higher than those of the expired leases. In a period of increasing sales, rents on new leases will tend to rise as tenants expectations of future growth become more optimistic. In periods of slower growth or declining sales, rents on new leases will grow more slowly or will decline for the opposite reason. However, center revenues nevertheless increase as older leases roll over or are terminated early and replaced with new leases negotiated at current rental rates that are usually higher than the average rates for existing leases.
The following tables contain certain information regarding per square foot minimum rent at the comparable centers, which exclude the discontinued operations at Biltmore Fashion Park, La Cumbre Plaza, and Paseo Nuevo, as well as centers opened or acquired during 2001 through 2003:
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |
| Average minimum rent per square foot: | |||
| All mall tenants | $42.97 | $42.18 | $41.83 |
| Stores opening during year | $47.10 | $44.63 | $50.36 |
| Square feet of GLA opened | 671,019 | 774,016 | 657,815 |
| Stores closing during year | $42.02 | $42.46 | $41.11 |
| Square feet of GLA closed | 822,688 | 661,981 | 803,542 |
Lease Expirations
The following table shows lease expirations based on information available as of December 31, 2003 for the next ten years for the centers in operation at that date:
| Lease Expiration Year |
Number of Leases Expiring |
Leased Area in Square Footage |
Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (in thousands) |
Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases Per Square Foot (1) |
Percent of Total Leased Square Footage Represented by Expiring Leases |
| 2004 (2) | 160 | 450,148 | $17,803 | $39.55 | 4.2% |
| 2005 | 231 | 554,833 | 25,408 | 45.79 | 5.1 |
| 2006 | 205 | 569,597 | 24,000 | 42.13 | 5.3 |
| 2007 | 257 | 735,973 | 29,500 | 40.08 | 6.8 |
| 2008 | 330 | 1,016,341 | 39,253 | 38.62 | 9.4 |
| 2009 | 306 | 917,413 | 38,619 | 42.10 | 8.5 |
| 2010 | 179 | 562,847 | 24,839 | 44.13 | 5.2 |
| 2011 | 437 | 1,504,337 | 60,187 | 40.01 | 13.9 |
| 2012 | 292 | 1,364,211 | 52,275 | 38.32 | 12.6 |
| 2013 | 259 | 1,137,565 | 40,165 | 35.31 | 10.5 |
| (1) | A higher percentage of space at value centers (Arizona Mills, Dolphin Mall, and Great Lakes Crossing) is typically rented to major and mall tenants at lower rents than the portfolio average. Excluding value centers, the annualized base rent under expiring leases is greater by a range of $3.66 to $13.82 or an average of $8.17 for the periods presented within this table. |
| (2) | Excludes leases that expire in 2004 for which renewal leases or leases with replacement tenants have been executed as of December 31, 2003. |
| (3) | Table excludes Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay. |
We believe that the information in the table is not necessarily indicative of what will occur in the future because of several factors, but principally because of early lease terminations at the centers. For example, the average remaining term of the leases that were terminated during the period 1997 to 2003 was approximately two years. The average term of leases signed during 2003 and 2002 was approximately seven years.
In addition, mall tenants at the centers may seek the protection of the bankruptcy laws, which could result in the termination of such tenants leases and thus cause a reduction in cash flow. In 2003, approximately 2.3% of leases were so affected compared to 1.7% in 2002. This statistic has ranged from 1.2% to 4.5% since we went public in 1992. Since 1991, the annual provision for losses on accounts receivable has been less than 2% of annual revenues.
Occupancy
For comparable centers, leased space, ending occupancy, and average occupancy were 90.0%, 88.1%, and 87.8%, respectively, in 2003, and 93.3%, 90.3%, and 88.2%, respectively, in 2002. Mall tenant average occupancy, ending occupancy, and leased space rates of all centers are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31 | |||||
|
| |||||
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
| Leased Space | 88.4% | 90.3% | 87.7% | 93.8% | 92.1% |
| Ending Occupancy | 86.1% | 87.0% | 84.0% | 90.5% | 90.4% |
| Average Occupancy | 85.6% | 84.8% | 84.9% | 89.1% | 89.0% |
Major Tenants
No single retail company represents 10% or more of our revenues. The combined operations of The Limited, Inc. accounted for approximately 5.2% of Mall GLA as of December 31, 2003 and 5.3% of 2003 minimum rent. No other single retail company accounted for more than 3% of Mall GLA or 4% of 2003 minimum rent. The following table shows the ten largest tenants and their square footage as of December 31, 2003:
| Tenant | # of Stores |
Square Footage |
% of Mall GLA |
| Limited (The Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret) | 74 | 527,895 | 5.2% |
| Gap (Gap, Gap Kids, Banana Republic) | 36 | 268,412 | 2.6 |
| Foot Locker (Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, Champs Sports) | 45 | 226,662 | 2.2 |
| Abercrombie & Fitch | 27 | 197,270 | 1.9 |
| Forever 21 | 13 | 180,047 | 1.8 |
| Retail Brand Alliance (Brooks Brothers, Casual Corner) | 29 | 173,623 | 1.7 |
| Williams-Sonoma (Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids) | 25 | 171,849 | 1.7 |
| Talbots | 16 | 125,791 | 1.2 |
| American Eagle Outfitters | 19 | 110,031 | 1.1 |
| Ann Taylor | 20 | 106,519 | 1.1 |
General Risks of the Company
Economic Performance and Value of Shopping Centers Dependent on Many Factors
The economic performance and value of our shopping centers are dependent on various factors. Additionally, these same factors will influence our decision whether to go forward on the development of new centers and may affect the ultimate economic performance and value of projects under construction (see other risks associated with the development of new centers under Business of the Company Development of New Centers). Such factors include:
| o | changes in the national, regional, and/or local economic and geopolitical climates, |
| o | competition from other shopping centers, discount stores, outlet malls, discount shopping clubs, direct mail, and the internet in attracting customers and tenants, |
| o | increases in operating costs, |
| o | the public perception of the safety of customers at the shopping centers, |
| o | environmental or legal liabilities, |
| o | availability and cost of financing, and |
| o | uninsured losses, whether because of unavailability of coverage or in excess of policy specifications and insured limits, including those resulting from wars, acts of terrorism, riots or civil disturbances, or losses from earthquakes or floods. |
In addition, the value of shopping centers may be adversely affected by:
| o | changes in government regulations, and |
| o | changes in real estate zoning and tax laws. |
Adverse changes in the economic performance and value of shopping centers would adversely affect our income and cash available to pay dividends.
Third Party Interests in the Centers
Some of the shopping centers are partially owned by non-affiliated partners through joint venture arrangements. As a result, we do not control all decisions regarding those shopping centers and may be required to take actions that are in the interest of the joint venture partners but not our best interests.
Bankruptcy of Mall Tenants or Joint Venture Partners
We could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of third parties. The bankruptcy of a mall tenant could result in the termination of its lease which would lower the amount of cash generated by that mall. In addition, if a department store operating an anchor at one of our shopping centers were to go into bankruptcy and cease operating, its closing may lead to reduced customer traffic and lower mall tenant sales which would, in turn, affect the amount of rent our tenants pay us. The profitability of shopping centers held in a joint venture could also be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of one of the joint venture partners if, because of certain provisions of the bankruptcy laws, we were unable to make important decisions in a timely fashion or became subject to additional liabilities.
Investments in and Loans to Third Parties
We occasionally extend credit to third parties in connection with the sale of land or other transactions. We have occasionally made investments in marketable and other equity securities. We are exposed to risk in the event the values of our investments and/or our loans decrease due to overall market conditions, business failure, and/or other nonperformance by the investees or counterparties.
Third Party Contracts
We provide property management, leasing, development, and other administrative services to centers owned by General Motors pension trusts, other third parties and to certain Taubman affiliates. The contracts under which these services are provided may be canceled or not renewed or may be renegotiated on terms less favorable to us. Certain overhead costs allocated to these contracts would not be eliminated if the contracts were to be canceled or not renewed.
Inability to Maintain Status as a REIT
| o | We may not be able to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for Federal income tax purposes with the result that the income distributed to shareholders will not be deductible in computing taxable income and instead would be subject to tax at regular corporate rates. Although we believe we are organized and operate in a manner to maintain our REIT qualification, many of the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code are very complex and have limited judicial or administrative interpretations. Changes in tax laws or regulations or new administrative interpretations and court decisions may also affect our ability to maintain REIT status in the future. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our income may also be subject to the alternative minimum tax. If we do not maintain our REIT status in any year, we may be unable to elect to be treated as a REIT for the next four taxable years. In addition, if we fail to meet the Internal Revenue Codes requirement that we distribute to shareholders at least 90% of our otherwise taxable income, less capital gain income, we will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax. The Internal Revenue Code does provide that an additional dividend payment may be declared and paid in the following taxable year so that we will be deemed to have distributed at least 90% of our taxable income to shareholders and thereby maintain our REIT status. The 4% excise tax is due and payable on the additional dividend payment made in the succeeding tax year in order to meet the 90% distribution requirement. |
| o | Although we currently intend to maintain our status as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax, or other considerations may cause us to determine that it would be in our and our shareholders best interests to revoke our REIT election. As noted above, if we revoke our REIT election, we will not be able to elect REIT status for the next four taxable years. |
Environmental Matters
All of the centers presently owned by us (not including option interests in certain pre- development projects or any of the real estate managed but not included in our portfolio) have been subject to environmental assessments. We are not aware of any environmental liability relating to the centers or any other property, in which we have or had an interest (whether as an owner or operator) that we believe, would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, or results of operations. No assurances can be given, however, that all environmental liabilities have been identified or that no prior owner, operator, or current occupant has created an environmental condition not known to us. Moreover, no assurances can be given that (1) future laws, ordinances, or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability or that (2) the current environmental condition of the centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants of the centers, by the condition of properties in the vicinity of the centers (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us.
Personnel
We have engaged the Manager to provide real estate management, acquisition, development, and administrative services required by us and our properties.
As of December 31, 2003, the Manager had 718 full-time employees. The following table provides a breakdown of employees by operational areas as of December 31, 2003:
| Number of Employees | |
| Center Operations | 307 (1) |
| Property Management | 178 |
| Leasing | 66 |
| Development | 44 |
| Financial Services | 65 |
| Other | 58 |
| Total | 718 |
| (1) | Certain services at the centers are provided by a contractor rather than by Company employees. |
Available Information
We make available free of charge through our website at www.taubman.com all reports we electronically file with, or furnish to, the Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after those documents are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These filings are also accessible on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Item 2. PROPERTIES.
Ownership
The following table sets forth certain information about each of the centers. The table includes only centers in operation at December 31, 2003. Excluded from this table is Northlake Mall which will open in 2005. Centers are owned in fee other than Beverly Center, Cherry Creek, International Plaza, MacArthur Center, and Sunvalley, which are held under ground leases expiring between 2049 and 2083.
Certain of the centers are partially owned through joint ventures. Generally, the Operating Partnerships joint venture partners have ongoing rights with regard to the disposition of the Operating Partnerships interest in the joint ventures, as well as the approval of certain major matters.
| Owned Centers | Anchors | Sq. Ft. of GLA/ Mall GLA as of 12/31/03 |
Year Opened/ Expanded |
Year Acquired |
Ownership % as of 12/31/03 |
| Arizona Mills | GameWorks, Harkins Cinemas, | 1,227,000/ | 1997 | 50% | |
| Tempe, AZ | JCPenney Outlet, Neiman Marcus- | 521,000 | |||
| (Phoenix Metropolitan Area) | Last Call, Off 5th Saks | ||||
| Beverly Center | Bloomingdale's, Macy's | 871,000/ | 1982 | 100% (1) | |
| Los Angeles, CA | 563,000 | ||||
| Cherry Creek | Foley's, Lord &Taylor, Neiman | 1,019,000/ | 1990/1998 | 50% | |
| Denver, CO | Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue | 546,000 (2) | |||
| Dolphin Mall | Burlington Coat Factory, | 1,311,000/ | 2001 | 100% | |
| Miami, FL | Cobb Theatres, Dave & Busters, | 621,000 | |||
| The Sports Authority, Off 5th Saks, | |||||
| Marshalls, Neiman Marcus-Last Call | |||||
| Fair Oaks | Hecht's, JCPenney, Lord &Taylor, | 1,571,000/ | 1980/1987/ | 50% | |
| Fairfax, VA | Sears, Macy's | 567,000 | 1988/2000 | ||
| (Washington, DC Metropolitan Area) | |||||
| Fairlane Town Center | Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Lord & | 1,530,000/ | 1976/1978/ | 100% | |
| Dearborn, MI | Taylor, Off 5th Saks, Sears | 640,000 | 1980/2000 | ||
| (Detroit Metropolitan Area) | |||||
| Great Lakes Crossing | Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, | 1,376,000/ | 1998 | 100% | |
| Auburn Hills, MI | GameWorks, Neiman Marcus- | 547,000 | |||
| (Detroit Metropolitan Area) | Last Call, Off 5th Saks, Star Theatres, | ||||
| Circuit City | |||||
| International Plaza | Dillard's, Lord & Taylor, Neiman | 1,223,000/ | 2001 | 26% | |
| Tampa, FL | Marcus, Nordstrom | 581,000 | |||
| MacArthur Center | Dillard's, Nordstrom | 933,000/ | 1999 | 95% | |
| Norfolk, VA | 519,000 | ||||
| The Mall at Millenia | Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman | 1,119,000/ | 2002 | 50% | |
| Orlando, FL | Marcus | 519,000 | |||
| Regency Square | Hecht's (two locations), JCPenney, | 826,000/ | 1975/1987 | 1997 | 100% |
| Richmond, VA | Sears | 239,000 | |||
| The Mall at Short Hills | Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman | 1,342,000/ | 1980/1994/ | 100% | |
| Short Hills, NJ | Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue | 520,000 | 1995 | ||
| Stamford Town Center | Filene's, Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue | 855,000/ | 1982 | 50% | |
| Stamford, CT | 362,000 | ||||
| Stony Point Fashion Park | Dillard's, Saks Fifth Avenue, Galyan's | 665,000/ | 2003 | 100% | |
| Richmond, VA | 299,000 | ||||
| Sunvalley | JCPenney, Macy's (two locations), | 1,330,000/ | 1967/1981 | 2002 | 50% |
| Concord, CA | Sears | 490,000 | |||
| (San Francisco Metropolitan Area) | |||||
| Twelve Oaks Mall | Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Lord & | 1,191,000/ | 1977/1978 | 100% | |
| Novi, MI | Taylor, Sears | 453,000 | |||
| (Detroit Metropolitan Area) | |||||
| Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay | Saks Fifth Avenue | 232,000/ | 1992 | 2003 | 25% |
| Naples, FL | 124,000 | ||||
| The Mall at Wellington Green | Burdines, Dillard's, JCPenney, | 1,283,000/ | 2001/2003 | 90% | |
| Wellington, FL | Lord &Taylor, Nordstrom | 469,000 | |||
| (Palm Beach County) | |||||
| Westfarms | Filene's, Filene's Men's Store/Furniture | 1,291,000/ | 1974/1983/ | 79% | |
| West Hartford, CT | Gallery, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, | 521,000 | 1997 | ||
| Nordstrom | |||||
| The Shops at Willow Bend | Dillard's, Foley's, Lord &Taylor, | 1,275,000/ | 2001 | 100% | |
| Plano, TX | Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth | 533,000 (3) | |||
| (Dallas Metropolitan Area) | Avenue (2004) | ||||
| Woodland | Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Sears | 1,028,000/ | 1968/1974/ | 50% | |
| Grand Rapids, MI | 354,000 | 1984/1989 | |||
|
| |||||
| Total GLA/Total Mall GLA: | 23,498,000/ | ||||
| 9,988,000 | |||||
| Average GLA/Average Mall GLA: | 1,119,000/ | ||||
| 476,000 |
| (1) | Ownership increased to 100% in January 2004. |
| (2) | GLA excludes approximately 166,000 square feet for the renovated buildings on adjacent peripheral land. |
| (3) | GLA excludes Saks Fifth Avenue, which will open in 2004. |
Anchors
The following table summarizes certain information regarding the anchors at the operating centers (excluding the value centers) as of December 31, 2003:
| Name | Number of Anchor Stores |
12/31/03 GLA (in thousands) |
% of GLA |
| Dillard's | 5 | 1,149 | 5.9% |
| Federated | |||
| Macy's | 7 | 1,469 | |
| Burdines | 1 | 200 | |
| Bloomingdale's | 3 | 614 | |
|
|
| ||
| Total | 11 | 2,283 | 11.6% |
| Galyan's | 1 | 84 | 0.4% |
| JCPenney | 8 | 1,508 | 7.7% |
| May Company | |||
| Lord & Taylor | 8 | 1,058 | |
| Hecht's | 3 | 453 | |
| Filene's | 2 | 379 | |
| Filene's Men's Store/ | |||
| Furniture Gallery | 1 | 80 | |
| Foley's | 2 | 418 | |
|
|
| ||
| Total | 16 | 2,388 | 12.2% |
| Neiman Marcus | 5 | 556 | 2.8% |
| Nordstrom | 5 | 796 | 4.1% |
| Saks | |||
| Saks Fifth Avenue (1) | 5 | 392 | |
| Off 5th Saks | 1 | 93 | |
|
|
| ||
| Total | 6 | 485 | 2.5% |
| Sears | 6 | 1,370 | 7.0% |
| Target Corporation | |||
| Marshall Field's | 3 | 647 | 3.3% |
|
|
|
| |
| Total | 66 | 11,266 | 57.5% |
|
|
|
|
| (1) | An additional Saks Fifth Avenue will open at The Shops at Willow Bend in 2004. |
| (2) | Percentages in table may not add due to rounding. |
Mortgage Debt
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages encumbering the centers as of December 31, 2003. All mortgage debt in the table below is nonrecourse to the Operating Partnership, except for debt encumbering Dolphin Mall, Stony Point Fashion Park, The Mall at Wellington Green, and The Shops at Willow Bend. The Operating Partnership has guaranteed the payment of all or a portion of the principal and interest on the mortgage debt of these centers. The Stony Point Fashion Park and Wellington Green loan ag