Back to GetFilings.com



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

  X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

OR

  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ___________________ to _________________
Commission File Number 1-11530

TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Michigan 38-2033632
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

200 East Long Lake Road
Suite 300, P.O. Box 200
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48303-0200
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (248) 258-6800


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
Common Stock, New York Stock Exchange
$0.01 Par Value

8.3% Series A Cumulative New York Stock Exchange
Redeemable Preferred Stock,
$0.01 Par Value

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such report(s)) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Yes X    No

X Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

  Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

     Yes X   No

As of March 5, 2004, the aggregate market value of the 49,724,783 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1.2 billion, based upon the closing price $24.68 on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date. (For this computation, the registrant has excluded the market value of all shares of its Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the registrant and certain other shareholders; such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an "affiliate" of the registrant.) As of March 5, 2003, there were outstanding 50,456,343 shares of Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting to be held in 2003 are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III.


PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS.

The Company

        Taubman Centers, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or “TCO”) was incorporated in Michigan in 1973 and had our initial public offering (“IPO”) in 1992. We own a 61% managing general partner’s interest in The Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership” or “TRG”), through which we conduct all of our operations.

        We are engaged in the ownership, development, acquisition, and operation of regional shopping centers and interests therein. Our portfolio, as of December 31, 2003, included 21 urban and suburban centers located in nine states. One new center is under construction in North Carolina and is scheduled to open September 15, 2005. The Operating Partnership also owns certain regional retail shopping center development projects and more than 99% of The Taubman Company LLC (the “Manager”), which manages the shopping centers and provides other services to the Operating Partnership and to us. See the table on page 10 of this report for information regarding the centers.

        We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In order to satisfy the provisions of the Code applicable to REITs, we must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income and meet certain other requirements. The Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute, at a minimum, sufficient amounts to its partners such that our pro rata share will enable us to pay shareholder dividends (including capital gains dividends that may be required upon the Operating Partnership’s sale of an asset) that will satisfy the REIT provisions of the Code.

Recent Developments

        For a discussion of business developments that occurred in 2003, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (MD&A).

The Shopping Center Business

        There are several types of retail shopping centers, varying primarily by size and marketing strategy. Retail shopping centers range from neighborhood centers of less than 100,000 square feet of GLA to regional and super-regional shopping centers. Retail shopping centers in excess of 400,000 square feet of GLA are generally referred to as “regional” shopping centers, while those centers having in excess of 800,000 square feet of GLA are generally referred to as “super-regional” shopping centers. Nineteen of our centers are “super-regional” centers. In this annual report on Form 10-K, the term “regional shopping centers” refers to both regional and super-regional shopping centers. The term “GLA” refers to gross retail space, including anchors and mall tenant areas, and the term “Mall GLA” refers to gross retail space, excluding anchors. The term “anchor” refers to a department store or other large retail store. The term “mall tenants” refers to stores (other than anchors) that are typically specialty retailers and lease space in shopping centers.

Business of the Company

        We, as managing general partner of the Operating Partnership, are engaged in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition, development, and expansion of regional shopping centers.

      The centers:

o are strategically located in major metropolitan areas, many in communities that are among the most affluent in the country, including New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Detroit, Phoenix, Miami, Dallas, Tampa, Orlando, and Washington, D.C.;

o range in size between 232,000 and 1.6 million square feet of GLA and between 124,000 and 640,000 square feet of Mall GLA. The smallest center has approximately 40 stores, and the largest has over 200 stores. Of the 21 centers, 19 are super-regional shopping centers;

o have approximately 2,900 stores operated by its mall tenants under approximately 1,200 trade names;

o have 66 anchors, operating under 17 trade names;

1


o lease most of Mall GLA to national chains, including subsidiaries or divisions of The Limited (The Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret, and others), Gap (Gap, Gap Kids, Banana Republic, and others), and Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, Champs Sports, and others); and

o are among the most productive (measured by mall tenants’ average per square foot sales) in the United States. In 2003, mall tenants had average per square foot sales of $468, which is significantly greater than the average for all regional shopping centers owned by public companies.

        The most important factor affecting the revenues generated by the centers is leasing to mall tenants (primarily specialty retailers), which represents approximately 90% of revenues. Anchors account for less than 10% of revenues because many own their stores and, in general, those that lease their stores do so at rates substantially lower than those in effect for mall tenants.

        Our portfolio is concentrated in highly productive super-regional shopping centers. Of the 21 centers, 20 had annual rent rolls at December 31, 2003 of over $10 million. We believe that this level of productivity is indicative of the centers’ strong competitive position and is, in significant part, attributable to our business strategy and philosophy. We believe that large shopping centers (including regional and especially super-regional shopping centers) are the least susceptible to direct competition because (among other reasons) anchors and large specialty retail stores do not find it economically attractive to open additional stores in the immediate vicinity of an existing location for fear of competing with themselves. In addition to the advantage of size, we believe that the centers’ success can be attributed in part to their other physical characteristics, such as design, layout, and amenities.

Business Strategy And Philosophy

        We believe that the regional shopping center business is not simply a real estate development business, but rather an operating business in which a retailing approach to the on-going management and leasing of the centers is essential. Thus we:

o offer a large, diverse selection of retail stores in each center to give customers a broad selection of consumer goods and variety of price ranges.

o endeavor to increase overall mall tenants’ sales by leasing space to a constantly changing mix of tenants, thereby increasing achievable rents.

o seek to anticipate trends in the retailing industry and emphasizes ongoing introductions of new retail concepts into our centers. Due in part to this strategy, a number of successful retail trade names have opened their first mall stores in the centers. In addition, we have brought to the centers “new to the market” retailers. We believe that the execution of this leasing strategy has been unique in the industry and is an important element in building and maintaining customer loyalty and increasing mall productivity.

o provide innovative initiatives that utilize technology and the Internet to heighten the shopping experience, build customer loyalty and increase tenant sales. One such initiative is our Taubman Center Website Program, which connects shoppers and retailers through an interactive content-driven website and a robust direct email program. More than 98% of the managed centers’ tenants provide content on a weekly basis for the program.

        The centers compete for retail consumer spending through diverse, in-depth presentations of predominantly fashion merchandise in an environment intended to facilitate customer shopping. While some centers include stores that target high-end, upscale customers, each center is individually merchandised in light of the demographics of its potential customers within convenient driving distance.

        Our leasing strategy involves assembling a diverse mix of mall tenants in each of the centers in order to attract customers, thereby generating higher sales by mall tenants. High sales by mall tenants make the centers attractive to prospective tenants, thereby increasing the rental rates that prospective tenants are willing to pay. We implement an active leasing strategy to increase the centers’ productivity and to set minimum rents at higher levels. Elements of this strategy include terminating leases of under-performing tenants, renegotiating existing leases, and not leasing space to prospective tenants that (though viable or attractive in certain ways) would not enhance a center’s retail mix.

2


Potential For Growth

        Our principal objective is to enhance shareholder value. We seek to maximize the financial results of our core assets, while also pursuing a growth strategy that primarily includes an active new center development program.

Internal Growth

        We expect that 90% of our future growth will come from our existing core portfolio and business. Although we’ve always had a culture of intensively managing our assets and maximizing the rents from tenants, we’re committed to improving the processes that significantly impact the core portfolio in order to drive even better performance.

        Our core business strategy is to maintain a portfolio of properties that deliver above-market profitable growth by providing targeted retailers with the best opportunity to do business in each market and targeted shoppers with the best local shopping experience for their needs.

        We are working on three endeavors that we believe will lead to achievement of our key mission to “deliver above market profitable growth”. Our first endeavor is to become an even more customer centric company than we are today, which will enable us to make better decisions driven by a fact-based understanding of what retailers and shoppers want. Our second endeavor is to become more operationally excellent, which will enable us to achieve competitive cost efficiencies, greater discipline, and more timely processes and decision making. This is especially important as our competitors search for economies of scale in increasingly larger operations. Our third endeavor is to achieve profitable growth, which we’ve defined as maintaining the highest tenant sales and sales growth in the industry, and accelerating core operations growth over time. We believe further integrating these basic strategic themes throughout the organization will serve to coordinate and prioritize all of our efforts to achieve our strategy.

        We’ve identified the key drivers to achieve our core business strategy. These drivers fall into four categories: people drivers, organizational drivers, customer drivers and financial drivers. These drivers served as a basis for the companywide initiatives we worked on in 2003 and that we believe will establish a strong foundation for improved core performance. We made progress on our initiatives, including the implementation of a new lease process software package in 2003, which will help reduce the time between a tenant leaving a space and a new tenant paying rent in that space. In addition, in a year which we’ve experienced significant early tenant terminations, we’ve worked to maximize income by increasing the number of temporary tenants. Also, we’ve made improvements to our tenant grading system to ensure that the system is a strong predictor of a new tenant’s ability to pay contract rent for its entire term and to establish risk parameters for each asset to guide our leasing team. We’re continuing to work on these and other initiatives to improve core performance.

        We strongly believe that focusing management attention on these initiatives will improve our performance on these drivers and by establishing specific benchmarks and goals for these drivers, which we can measure year after year, we will have set the stage for future strong core operations growth.

Development of New Centers

        We are pursuing an active program of regional shopping center development. We believe that we have the expertise to develop economically attractive regional shopping centers through intensive analysis of local retail opportunities. We believe that the development of new centers is an important use of our capital and an area in which we excel. At any time, we have numerous potential development projects in various stages.

        The Mall at Millenia, a 1.1 million square foot center in which the Operating Partnership has a 50% interest, opened in October 2002 in Orlando, Florida.

        Stony Point Fashion Park, a 665,000 square foot wholly-owned center, opened September 18, 2003 in Richmond, Virginia.

        Northlake Mall, a 1.1 million square foot wholly-owned center in Charlotte, North Carolina is currently under construction and is scheduled to open September 15, 2005.

3


        Our approximately $34.2 million balance of development pre-construction costs as of December 31, 2003 consists of costs relating to our Oyster Bay project in Syosset, New York. Refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Planned Capital Spending regarding the status of this project.

        Our policies with respect to development activities are designed to reduce the risks associated with development. We generally do not intend to acquire land early in the development process. Instead, we generally acquire options on land or form partnerships with landholders holding potentially attractive development sites. We typically exercise the options only once we are prepared to begin construction. The pre-construction phase for a regional center typically extends over several years and the time to obtain anchor commitments, zoning and regulatory approvals, and public financing arrangements can vary significantly from project to project. In addition, we do not intend to begin construction until a sufficient number of anchor stores have agreed to operate in the shopping center, such that we are confident that the projected sales and rents from Mall GLA are sufficient to earn a return on invested capital in excess of our cost of capital. Having historically followed these principles, our experience indicates that, on average, less than 10% of the costs of the development of a regional shopping center will be incurred prior to the construction period. However, no assurance can be given that we will continue to be able to so limit pre-construction costs. Unexpected costs due to extended zoning and regulatory processes may cause our investment in a project to exceed this historic experience.

        While we will continue to evaluate development projects using criteria, including financial criteria for rates of return, similar to those employed in the past, no assurances can be given that the adherence to these policies will produce comparable results in the future. In addition, the costs of shopping center development opportunities that are explored but ultimately abandoned will, to some extent, diminish the overall return on development projects (see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Capital Spending for further discussion of our development activities).

Strategic Acquisitions

        Our objective is to acquire existing centers only when they are compatible with the quality of our portfolio (or can be redeveloped to that level) and that satisfy our strategic plans and pricing requirements. During 2003 we acquired:

o a 25% interest in Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay in Naples, Florida.

o an additional 25% interest in MacArthur Center, bringing our ownership in the shopping center to 95%.

o the 15% minority interest in Great Lakes Crossing, bringing our ownership in the shopping center to 100%.

Expansions of the Centers

        Another potential element of growth is the strategic expansion of existing properties to update and enhance their market positions, by replacing or adding new anchor stores or increasing mall tenant space. Most of the centers have been designed to accommodate expansions. Expansion projects can be as significant as new shopping center construction in terms of scope and cost, requiring governmental and existing anchor store approvals, design and engineering activities, including rerouting utilities, providing additional parking areas or decking, acquiring additional land, and relocating anchors and mall tenants (all of which must take place with a minimum of disruption to existing tenants and customers).

4


        The following table includes information regarding recent development, acquisition, and expansion activities:

Developments:    

Completion Date Center Location

March 2001 Dolphin Mall Miami, Florida
August 2001 The Shops at Willow Bend Plano, Texas
September 2001 International Plaza Tampa, Florida
October 2001 The Mall at Wellington Green Wellington, Florida
October 2002 The Mall at Millenia Orlando, Florida
September 2003 Stony Point Fashion Park Richmond, Virginia

Acquisitions:

Completion Date Center Location

August 2000 Twelve Oaks Mall Novi, Michigan

    additional interest (1)
May 2002 Sunvalley (2) Concord, California
May 2002 Arizona Mills Tempe, Arizona

    additional interest (3)
October 2002 Dolphin Mall Miami, Florida

    additional interest (4)
March 2003 Great Lakes Crossing Auburn Hills, Michigan

    additional interest (5)
July 2003 MacArthur Center Norfolk, Virginia

    additional interest (6)
December 2003 Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay (7) Naples, Florida

Expansions and Renovations:

Completion Date Center Location

February 2000 - September 2000 Fair Oaks (8) Fairfax, Virginia
May 2000 Fairlane (9) Dearborn, Michigan
December 2000-2001 Beverly Center (10) Los Angeles, California
November 2001 Twelve Oaks Mall (11) Novi, Michigan
November 2001 Woodland (11) Grand Rapids, Michigan
November 2003 The Mall at Short Hills (10) Short Hills, New Jersey
December 2003 Regency Square (10) Richmond, Virginia

(1) In August 2000, the joint venture partner’s 50% interest in the center was acquired.
(2) In May 2002, a 50% interest in the center was acquired.
(3) In May 2002, an additional 13% interest in the center was acquired.
(4) In October 2002, the joint venture partner’s 50% interest in the center was acquired.
(5) In March 2003, the joint venture partner’s 15% interest in the center was acquired.
(6) In July 2003, an additional 25% interest in the center was acquired.
(7) In December 2003, a 25% interest in the center was acquired.
(8) Hecht’s opened an expansion in February. Additionally, a JCPenney expansion and newly constructed Macy’s opened in September.
(9) A 21-screen theater opened.
(10) Renovation completed.
(11) New food court opened.

Rental Rates

        As leases have expired in the centers, we have generally been able to rent the available space, either to the existing tenant or a new tenant, at rental rates that are higher than those of the expired leases. In a period of increasing sales, rents on new leases will tend to rise as tenants’ expectations of future growth become more optimistic. In periods of slower growth or declining sales, rents on new leases will grow more slowly or will decline for the opposite reason. However, center revenues nevertheless increase as older leases roll over or are terminated early and replaced with new leases negotiated at current rental rates that are usually higher than the average rates for existing leases.

5


        The following tables contain certain information regarding per square foot minimum rent at the comparable centers, which exclude the discontinued operations at Biltmore Fashion Park, La Cumbre Plaza, and Paseo Nuevo, as well as centers opened or acquired during 2001 through 2003:

  2003 2002 2001
Average minimum rent per square foot:
     All mall tenants $42.97 $42.18 $41.83
     Stores opening during year $47.10 $44.63 $50.36
     Square feet of GLA opened 671,019 774,016 657,815
     Stores closing during year $42.02 $42.46 $41.11
     Square feet of GLA closed 822,688 661,981 803,542

Lease Expirations

        The following table shows lease expirations based on information available as of December 31, 2003 for the next ten years for the centers in operation at that date:

Lease
Expiration
Year
Number of
Leases
Expiring
Leased Area in
Square Footage
Annualized Base
Rent Under
Expiring Leases
(in thousands)
Annualized Base
Rent Under
Expiring Leases
Per Square Foot (1)
Percent of
Total Leased
Square Footage
Represented by
Expiring Leases
           
                2004 (2) 160 450,148 $17,803 $39.55 4.2%
                2005 231 554,833 25,408 45.79 5.1   
                2006 205 569,597 24,000 42.13 5.3   
                2007 257 735,973 29,500 40.08 6.8   
                2008 330 1,016,341 39,253 38.62 9.4   
                2009 306 917,413 38,619 42.10 8.5   
                2010 179 562,847 24,839 44.13 5.2   
                2011 437 1,504,337 60,187 40.01 13.9   
                2012 292 1,364,211 52,275 38.32 12.6   
                2013 259 1,137,565 40,165 35.31 10.5   

(1) A higher percentage of space at value centers (Arizona Mills, Dolphin Mall, and Great Lakes Crossing) is typically rented to major and mall tenants at lower rents than the portfolio average. Excluding value centers, the annualized base rent under expiring leases is greater by a range of $3.66 to $13.82 or an average of $8.17 for the periods presented within this table.
(2) Excludes leases that expire in 2004 for which renewal leases or leases with replacement tenants have been executed as of December 31, 2003.
(3) Table excludes Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay.

        We believe that the information in the table is not necessarily indicative of what will occur in the future because of several factors, but principally because of early lease terminations at the centers. For example, the average remaining term of the leases that were terminated during the period 1997 to 2003 was approximately two years. The average term of leases signed during 2003 and 2002 was approximately seven years.

        In addition, mall tenants at the centers may seek the protection of the bankruptcy laws, which could result in the termination of such tenants’ leases and thus cause a reduction in cash flow. In 2003, approximately 2.3% of leases were so affected compared to 1.7% in 2002. This statistic has ranged from 1.2% to 4.5% since we went public in 1992. Since 1991, the annual provision for losses on accounts receivable has been less than 2% of annual revenues.

Occupancy

        For comparable centers, leased space, ending occupancy, and average occupancy were 90.0%, 88.1%, and 87.8%, respectively, in 2003, and 93.3%, 90.3%, and 88.2%, respectively, in 2002. Mall tenant average occupancy, ending occupancy, and leased space rates of all centers are as follows:

6


Year Ended December 31

  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999 

Leased Space 88.4% 90.3% 87.7% 93.8% 92.1%
Ending Occupancy 86.1% 87.0% 84.0% 90.5% 90.4%
Average Occupancy 85.6% 84.8% 84.9% 89.1% 89.0%

Major Tenants

        No single retail company represents 10% or more of our revenues. The combined operations of The Limited, Inc. accounted for approximately 5.2% of Mall GLA as of December 31, 2003 and 5.3% of 2003 minimum rent. No other single retail company accounted for more than 3% of Mall GLA or 4% of 2003 minimum rent. The following table shows the ten largest tenants and their square footage as of December 31, 2003:

Tenant # of
Stores
Square
Footage
% of
Mall GLA
       
Limited (The Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret) 74 527,895 5.2%   
Gap (Gap, Gap Kids, Banana Republic) 36 268,412 2.6      
Foot Locker (Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, Champs Sports) 45 226,662 2.2      
Abercrombie & Fitch 27 197,270 1.9      
Forever 21 13 180,047 1.8      
Retail Brand Alliance (Brooks Brothers, Casual Corner) 29 173,623 1.7      
Williams-Sonoma (Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids) 25 171,849 1.7      
Talbots 16 125,791 1.2      
American Eagle Outfitters 19 110,031 1.1      
Ann Taylor 20 106,519 1.1      

General Risks of the Company

Economic Performance and Value of Shopping Centers Dependent on Many Factors

        The economic performance and value of our shopping centers are dependent on various factors. Additionally, these same factors will influence our decision whether to go forward on the development of new centers and may affect the ultimate economic performance and value of projects under construction (see other risks associated with the development of new centers under “Business of the Company — Development of New Centers”). Such factors include:

o changes in the national, regional, and/or local economic and geopolitical climates,

o competition from other shopping centers, discount stores, outlet malls, discount shopping clubs, direct mail, and the internet in attracting customers and tenants,

o increases in operating costs,

o the public perception of the safety of customers at the shopping centers,

o environmental or legal liabilities,

o availability and cost of financing, and

o uninsured losses, whether because of unavailability of coverage or in excess of policy specifications and insured limits, including those resulting from wars, acts of terrorism, riots or civil disturbances, or losses from earthquakes or floods.

In addition, the value of shopping centers may be adversely affected by:

o changes in government regulations, and

o changes in real estate zoning and tax laws.

        Adverse changes in the economic performance and value of shopping centers would adversely affect our income and cash available to pay dividends.

7


Third Party Interests in the Centers

        Some of the shopping centers are partially owned by non-affiliated partners through joint venture arrangements. As a result, we do not control all decisions regarding those shopping centers and may be required to take actions that are in the interest of the joint venture partners but not our best interests.

Bankruptcy of Mall Tenants or Joint Venture Partners

        We could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of third parties. The bankruptcy of a mall tenant could result in the termination of its lease which would lower the amount of cash generated by that mall. In addition, if a department store operating an anchor at one of our shopping centers were to go into bankruptcy and cease operating, its closing may lead to reduced customer traffic and lower mall tenant sales which would, in turn, affect the amount of rent our tenants pay us. The profitability of shopping centers held in a joint venture could also be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of one of the joint venture partners if, because of certain provisions of the bankruptcy laws, we were unable to make important decisions in a timely fashion or became subject to additional liabilities.

Investments in and Loans to Third Parties

        We occasionally extend credit to third parties in connection with the sale of land or other transactions. We have occasionally made investments in marketable and other equity securities. We are exposed to risk in the event the values of our investments and/or our loans decrease due to overall market conditions, business failure, and/or other nonperformance by the investees or counterparties.

Third Party Contracts

        We provide property management, leasing, development, and other administrative services to centers owned by General Motors pension trusts, other third parties and to certain Taubman affiliates. The contracts under which these services are provided may be canceled or not renewed or may be renegotiated on terms less favorable to us. Certain overhead costs allocated to these contracts would not be eliminated if the contracts were to be canceled or not renewed.

Inability to Maintain Status as a REIT

o We may not be able to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for Federal income tax purposes with the result that the income distributed to shareholders will not be deductible in computing taxable income and instead would be subject to tax at regular corporate rates. Although we believe we are organized and operate in a manner to maintain our REIT qualification, many of the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code are very complex and have limited judicial or administrative interpretations. Changes in tax laws or regulations or new administrative interpretations and court decisions may also affect our ability to maintain REIT status in the future. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our income may also be subject to the alternative minimum tax. If we do not maintain our REIT status in any year, we may be unable to elect to be treated as a REIT for the next four taxable years. In addition, if we fail to meet the Internal Revenue Code’s requirement that we distribute to shareholders at least 90% of our otherwise taxable income, less capital gain income, we will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax. The Internal Revenue Code does provide that an additional dividend payment may be declared and paid in the following taxable year so that we will be deemed to have distributed at least 90% of our taxable income to shareholders and thereby maintain our REIT status. The 4% excise tax is due and payable on the additional dividend payment made in the succeeding tax year in order to meet the 90% distribution requirement.

o Although we currently intend to maintain our status as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax, or other considerations may cause us to determine that it would be in our and our shareholders’ best interests to revoke our REIT election. As noted above, if we revoke our REIT election, we will not be able to elect REIT status for the next four taxable years.

8


Environmental Matters

        All of the centers presently owned by us (not including option interests in certain pre- development projects or any of the real estate managed but not included in our portfolio) have been subject to environmental assessments. We are not aware of any environmental liability relating to the centers or any other property, in which we have or had an interest (whether as an owner or operator) that we believe, would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, or results of operations. No assurances can be given, however, that all environmental liabilities have been identified or that no prior owner, operator, or current occupant has created an environmental condition not known to us. Moreover, no assurances can be given that (1) future laws, ordinances, or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability or that (2) the current environmental condition of the centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants of the centers, by the condition of properties in the vicinity of the centers (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us.

Personnel

        We have engaged the Manager to provide real estate management, acquisition, development, and administrative services required by us and our properties.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Manager had 718 full-time employees. The following table provides a breakdown of employees by operational areas as of December 31, 2003:

  Number of Employees
   
Center Operations 307 (1)
Property Management 178     
Leasing 66     
Development 44     
Financial Services 65     
Other 58     
    Total 718     

    (1)      Certain services at the centers are provided by a contractor rather than by Company employees.

Available Information

        We make available free of charge through our website at www.taubman.com all reports we electronically file with, or furnish to, the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after those documents are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Item 2. PROPERTIES.

Ownership

        The following table sets forth certain information about each of the centers. The table includes only centers in operation at December 31, 2003. Excluded from this table is Northlake Mall which will open in 2005. Centers are owned in fee other than Beverly Center, Cherry Creek, International Plaza, MacArthur Center, and Sunvalley, which are held under ground leases expiring between 2049 and 2083.

        Certain of the centers are partially owned through joint ventures. Generally, the Operating Partnership’s joint venture partners have ongoing rights with regard to the disposition of the Operating Partnership’s interest in the joint ventures, as well as the approval of certain major matters.

9


Owned Centers Anchors Sq. Ft. of GLA/
Mall GLA
as of 12/31/03
Year Opened/
Expanded
Year
Acquired
Ownership %
as of 12/31/03
Arizona Mills GameWorks, Harkins Cinemas, 1,227,000/ 1997   50%
Tempe, AZ JCPenney Outlet, Neiman Marcus- 521,000      
(Phoenix Metropolitan Area) Last Call, Off 5th Saks

Beverly Center Bloomingdale's, Macy's 871,000/ 1982   100% (1)
Los Angeles, CA   563,000      

Cherry Creek Foley's, Lord &Taylor, Neiman 1,019,000/ 1990/1998   50%
Denver, CO Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue 546,000 (2)      

Dolphin Mall Burlington Coat Factory, 1,311,000/ 2001   100%
Miami, FL Cobb Theatres, Dave & Busters, 621,000      
  The Sports Authority, Off 5th Saks,
  Marshalls, Neiman Marcus-Last Call

Fair Oaks Hecht's, JCPenney, Lord &Taylor, 1,571,000/ 1980/1987/   50%
Fairfax, VA Sears, Macy's 567,000 1988/2000    
(Washington, DC Metropolitan Area)

Fairlane Town Center Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Lord & 1,530,000/ 1976/1978/   100%
Dearborn, MI Taylor, Off 5th Saks, Sears 640,000 1980/2000    
(Detroit Metropolitan Area)

Great Lakes Crossing Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, 1,376,000/ 1998   100%
Auburn Hills, MI GameWorks, Neiman Marcus- 547,000      
(Detroit Metropolitan Area) Last Call, Off 5th Saks, Star Theatres,
  Circuit City

International Plaza Dillard's, Lord & Taylor, Neiman 1,223,000/ 2001   26%
Tampa, FL Marcus, Nordstrom 581,000      

MacArthur Center Dillard's, Nordstrom 933,000/ 1999   95%
Norfolk, VA   519,000      

The Mall at Millenia Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman 1,119,000/ 2002   50%
Orlando, FL Marcus 519,000      

Regency Square Hecht's (two locations), JCPenney, 826,000/ 1975/1987 1997 100%
Richmond, VA Sears 239,000      

The Mall at Short Hills Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman 1,342,000/ 1980/1994/   100%
Short Hills, NJ Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue 520,000 1995    

Stamford Town Center Filene's, Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue 855,000/ 1982   50%
Stamford, CT   362,000      

Stony Point Fashion Park Dillard's, Saks Fifth Avenue, Galyan's 665,000/ 2003   100%
Richmond, VA   299,000      

Sunvalley JCPenney, Macy's (two locations), 1,330,000/ 1967/1981 2002 50%
Concord, CA Sears 490,000      
(San Francisco Metropolitan Area)

Twelve Oaks Mall Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Lord & 1,191,000/ 1977/1978   100%
Novi, MI Taylor, Sears 453,000      
(Detroit Metropolitan Area)

Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay Saks Fifth Avenue 232,000/ 1992 2003 25%
Naples, FL   124,000      

The Mall at Wellington Green Burdines, Dillard's, JCPenney, 1,283,000/ 2001/2003   90%
Wellington, FL Lord &Taylor, Nordstrom 469,000      
(Palm Beach County)

Westfarms Filene's, Filene's Men's Store/Furniture 1,291,000/ 1974/1983/   79%
West Hartford, CT Gallery, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, 521,000 1997    
  Nordstrom

The Shops at Willow Bend Dillard's, Foley's, Lord &Taylor, 1,275,000/ 2001   100%
Plano, TX Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth 533,000 (3)      
(Dallas Metropolitan Area) Avenue (2004)

Woodland Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Sears 1,028,000/ 1968/1974/   50%
Grand Rapids, MI   354,000 1984/1989    
   

  Total GLA/Total Mall GLA: 23,498,000/
    9,988,000      

  Average GLA/Average Mall GLA: 1,119,000/
    476,000      
(1) Ownership increased to 100% in January 2004.
(2) GLA excludes approximately 166,000 square feet for the renovated buildings on adjacent peripheral land.
(3) GLA excludes Saks Fifth Avenue, which will open in 2004.

10


Anchors

        The following table summarizes certain information regarding the anchors at the operating centers (excluding the value centers) as of December 31, 2003:

Name Number of
Anchor Stores
12/31/03 GLA
(in thousands)
% of GLA
       
Dillard's 1,149  5.9%

Federated
     Macy's 1,469 
     Burdines 200 
     Bloomingdale's 614 
 

       Total 11  2,283  11.6%

Galyan's 84  0.4%

JCPenney 1,508  7.7%

May Company
     Lord & Taylor 1,058 
     Hecht's 453 
     Filene's 379 
     Filene's Men's Store/
       Furniture Gallery 80 
     Foley's 418 
 

     Total 16  2,388  12.2%

Neiman Marcus 556  2.8%

Nordstrom 796  4.1%

Saks
     Saks Fifth Avenue (1) 392 
     Off 5th Saks 93 
 

     Total 485  2.5%

Sears 1,370  7.0%

Target Corporation
     Marshall Field's 647  3.3%
 



Total 66  11,266  57.5%
 


(1) An additional Saks Fifth Avenue will open at The Shops at Willow Bend in 2004.
(2) Percentages in table may not add due to rounding.

Mortgage Debt

        The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages encumbering the centers as of December 31, 2003. All mortgage debt in the table below is nonrecourse to the Operating Partnership, except for debt encumbering Dolphin Mall, Stony Point Fashion Park, The Mall at Wellington Green, and The Shops at Willow Bend. The Operating Partnership has guaranteed the payment of all or a portion of the principal and interest on the mortgage debt of these centers. The Stony Point Fashion Park and Wellington Green loan ag