| X |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. |
OR
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________________ to _________________ Commission File Number 1-11530 |
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| Michigan | 38-2033632 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| 200 East Long Lake Road | |
| Suite 300, P.O. Box 200 | |
| Bloomfield Hills, Michigan | 48303-0200 |
| (Address of principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (248) 258-6800 |
| Name of each exchange | |
| Title of each class | on which registered |
| Common Stock, | New York Stock Exchange |
| $0.01 Par Value | |
| 8.3% Series A Cumulative | New York Stock Exchange |
| Redeemable Preferred Stock, | |
| $0.01 Par Value |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such report(s)) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |
|
Indicate
by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes X No |
As of March 20, 2003, the aggregate market value of the 51,557,179 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $902 million, based upon the closing price $17.49 on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date. (For this computation, the registrant has excluded the market value of all shares of its Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the registrant and certain other shareholders; such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an affiliate of the registrant.) As of March 20, 2003, there were outstanding 52,270,965 shares of Common Stock.
Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting to be held in 2003 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS.
The Company
Taubman Centers, Inc. (the Company or TCO) was incorporated in Michigan in 1973 and had its initial public offering (IPO) in 1992. The Company owns a 62% managing general partners interest in The Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership or TRG), through which the Company conducts all its operations. The Company owns, develops, acquires, and operates regional shopping centers and interests therein. The Companys portfolio, as of December 31, 2002, included 20 urban and suburban centers located in nine states. One new center is under construction in Virginia and will open in September 2003. Construction is scheduled to begin on a second new center in 2003. The center is located in North Carolina and will open in August 2005. The Operating Partnership also owns certain regional retail shopping center development projects and more than 99% of The Taubman Company LLC (the Manager), which manages the shopping centers and provides other services to the Operating Partnership and the Company. See the table on pages 12 and 13 of this report for information regarding the centers.
The Company is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). In order to satisfy the provisions of the Code applicable to REITs, the Company must distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income and meet certain other requirements. The Operating Partnerships partnership agreement provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute, at a minimum, sufficient amounts to its partners such that the Companys pro rata share will enable the Company to pay shareholder dividends (including capital gains dividends that may be required upon the Operating Partnerships sale of an asset) that will satisfy the REIT provisions of the Code.
Recent Developments
For a discussion of business developments that occurred in 2002, see Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).
The Shopping Center Business
There are several types of retail shopping centers, varying primarily by size and marketing strategy. Retail shopping centers range from neighborhood centers of less than 100,000 square feet of GLA to regional and super-regional shopping centers. Retail shopping centers in excess of 400,000 square feet of GLA are generally referred to as regional shopping centers, while those centers having in excess of 800,000 square feet of GLA are generally referred to as super-regional shopping centers. Nineteen of the centers are super-regional centers. In this annual report on Form 10-K, the term regional shopping centers refers to both regional and super-regional shopping centers. The term GLA refers to gross retail space, including anchors and mall tenant areas, and the term Mall GLA refers to gross retail space, excluding anchors. The term anchor refers to a department store or other large retail store. The term mall tenants refers to stores (other than anchors) that are typically specialty retailers and lease space in shopping centers.
1
Business of the Company
The Company, as managing general partner of the Operating Partnership, is engaged in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition, development, and expansion of regional shopping centers.
The centers:
| o | are strategically located in major metropolitan areas, many in communities that are among the most affluent in the country, including New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Detroit, Phoenix, Miami, Dallas, Tampa, Orlando, and Washington, D.C.; |
| o | range in size between 611,000 and 1.6 million square feet of GLA and between 238,000 and 635,000 square feet of Mall GLA. The smallest center has approximately 70 stores, and the largest has over 200 stores. Of the 20 centers, 19 are super-regional shopping centers; |
| o | have approximately 3,000 stores operated by its mall tenants under approximately 1,300 trade names; |
| o | have 63 anchors, operating under 16 trade names; |
| o | lease over 75% of Mall GLA to national chains, including subsidiaries or divisions of The Limited (The Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret, and others), Gap (Gap, Gap Kids, Banana Republic, and others), and Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, Champs Sports, and others); and |
| o | are among the most productive (measured by mall tenants average per square foot sales) in the United States. In 2002, mall tenants had average per square foot sales of $456, which is significantly greater than the average for all regional shopping centers owned by public companies. |
The most important factor affecting the revenues generated by the centers is leasing to mall tenants (primarily specialty retailers), which represents approximately 90% of revenues. Anchors account for less than 10% of revenues because many own their stores and, in general, those that lease their stores do so at rates substantially lower than those in effect for mall tenants.
The Companys portfolio is concentrated in highly productive super-regional shopping centers. All 20 centers had annual rent rolls at December 31, 2002 of over $10 million. The Company believes that this level of productivity is indicative of the centers strong competitive position and is, in significant part, attributable to the Companys business strategy and philosophy. The Company believes that large shopping centers (including regional and especially super-regional shopping centers) are the least susceptible to direct competition because (among other reasons) anchors and large specialty retail stores do not find it economically attractive to open additional stores in the immediate vicinity of an existing location for fear of competing with themselves. In addition to the advantage of size, the Company believes that the centers success can be attributed in part to their other physical characteristics, such as design, layout, and amenities.
2
Business Strategy And Philosophy
The Company believes that the regional shopping center business is not simply a real estate development business, but rather an operating business in which a retailing approach to the on-going management and leasing of the centers is essential. Thus the Company:
| o | offers a large, diverse selection of retail stores in each center to give customers a broad selection of consumer goods and variety of price ranges. |
| o | endeavors to increase overall mall tenants sales by leasing space to a constantly changing mix of tenants, thereby increasing achievable rents. |
| o | seeks to anticipate trends in the retailing industry and emphasizes ongoing introductions of new retail concepts into the centers. Due in part to this strategy, a number of successful retail trade names have opened their first mall stores in the centers. In addition, the Company has brought to the centers new to the market retailers. The Company believes that its execution of this leasing strategy has been unique in the industry and is an important element in building and maintaining customer loyalty and increasing mall productivity. |
| o | provides innovative initiatives that utilize technology and the internet to heighten the shopping experience for customers, build customer loyalty and increase tenant sales. One such initiative is the Companys ShopTaubman one-to-one marketing program, which connects shoppers and retailers through online websites. Approximately 99% of the managed centers tenants participate in the center websites and at the end of 2002, these sites had approximately 622 thousand registered users. |
The centers compete for retail consumer spending through diverse, in-depth presentations of predominantly fashion merchandise in an environment intended to facilitate customer shopping. While some centers include stores that target high-end, upscale customers, each center is individually merchandised in light of the demographics of its potential customers within convenient driving distance.
The Companys leasing strategy involves assembling a diverse mix of mall tenants in each of the centers in order to attract customers, thereby generating higher sales by mall tenants. High sales by mall tenants make the centers attractive to prospective tenants, thereby increasing the rental rates that prospective tenants are willing to pay. The Company implements an active leasing strategy to increase the centers productivity and to set minimum rents at higher levels. Elements of this strategy include terminating leases of under-performing tenants, renegotiating existing leases, and not leasing space to prospective tenants that (though viable or attractive in certain ways) would not enhance a centers retail mix.
Potential For Growth
The Companys principal objective is to enhance shareholder value. The Company seeks to maximize the financial results of its assets, while pursuing a growth strategy that concentrates primarily on an active new center development program.
Internal Growth
In mid-2001, the Company underwent a major review of its business strategies, which highlighted that 90% of the Companys future growth will come from its existing core portfolio and business. Although the Company has always had a culture of intensively managing its assets and maximizing the rents from tenants, the Company committed to review all of the processes that impact the core portfolio in order to drive even better performance.
First, the Company agreed upon the core business strategy, which is to maintain a portfolio of properties that deliver above-market profitable growth by providing targeted retailers with the best opportunity to do business in each market and targeted shoppers with the best local shopping experience for their needs.
3
The Company decided upon three endeavors that would lead to achievement of the key mission to deliver above market profitable growth. The Companys first endeavor is to become an even more customer centric company than it is today, which will enable the Company to make better decisions driven by fact-based understanding of what retailers and shoppers want. The second endeavor is to become more operationally excellent, which will enable the Company to achieve competitive cost efficiencies, greater discipline, and more timely processes and decision making. This is especially important as the Companys competitors search for economies of scale in increasingly larger operations. The third endeavor is to achieve profitable growth, which the Company has defined as maintaining the highest tenant sales and sales growth in the industry, and accelerating core Net Operating Income (NOI) growth over time. The Company believes further integrating these basic strategic themes throughout the organization will serve to coordinate and prioritize all of the Companys efforts to achieve its strategy.
The Company has identified the key drivers to achieve its core business strategy. These drivers fall into four categories: people drivers, organizational drivers, customer drivers and financial drivers. The Company identified 40 drivers of the core business that served as a basis for seven companywide initiatives to be completed in 2003 that will establish a strong foundation for improved core performance. These initiatives are each being led by teams of approximately 7 to 8 people from all areas of the organization.
| o | Initiative One Common Area Maintenance (CAM). This team will focus on all of the Companys CAM processes to ensure that decision making is customer-based, and as low-cost and efficient as possible. |
| o | Initiative Two Customer knowledge. This team will take a fresh look at how the Company obtains and applies tenant and shopper research in all its decision making throughout the organization. |
| o | Initiative Three Credit grading. This team will review the Companys current tenant grading system and seek improvements to ensure that the system is a strong predictor of a tenants ability to pay contract rent for its entire term and establish risk parameters for each asset to guide our leasing team. |
| o | Initiative Four Tenant optimization. Utilizing the enhanced credit grading system just described, this team will create upgraded and more formalized management tools. These will help in making leasing decisions based on information that quantifies the tradeoffs between occupancy, rent, credit risk and merchandising to ensure the greatest shareholder value creation in each individual leasing condition. |
| o | Initiative Five Leasing and store-opening process. This team will complete the implementation of process improvements identified in 2002 that will reduce the time between a tenant leaving a space and a new tenant paying rent in that space. This involves a new lease process software package that will be implemented by June 2003 and the establishment of enhanced metrics and goals to monitor improvement. |
| o | Initiative Six Leadership and technical competencies. This team will update the key leadership and technical skills required at each level of the organization. The Company will then determine any gaps and create a plan to bridge these gaps by individual. |
| o | Initiative Seven Linkage of the core drivers to individual commitments. This team will create a direct linkage of all 40 core drivers to individual goals and commitments and ensure compensation plans are appropriately structured to provide associates incentives to improve the core. |
The Company strongly believes that focusing management attention on these initiatives will improve its performance on these drivers and by establishing specific benchmarks and goals for these drivers, which the Company can measure year after year, the Company will have set the stage for strong NOI growth over the near to midterm.
Development of New Centers
The Company is pursuing an active program of regional shopping center development. The Company believes that it has the expertise to develop economically attractive regional shopping centers through intensive analysis of local retail opportunities. The Company believes that the development of new centers is an important use of its capital and an area in which the Company excels. At any time, the Company has numerous potential development projects in various stages.
4
The Mall at Millenia, a 1.1 million square foot super-regional center located in Orlando, Florida opened on October 18, 2002. The center is anchored by Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdales, and Macys. Additionally, one new center is currently under construction; Stony Point Fashion Park, a 690 thousand square foot center in Richmond, Virginia, is scheduled to open in September 2003. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2003 on NorthLake Mall, a 1.2 million square foot center in Charlotte, North Carolina. The center is scheduled to open in August 2005.
The Companys policies with respect to development activities are designed to reduce the risks associated with development. For instance, the Company previously entered into an agreement to lease a center while the Company investigated the redevelopment opportunities of the center. Also, the Company generally does not intend to acquire land early in the development process. Instead, the Company generally acquires options on land or forms partnerships with landholders holding potentially attractive development sites. The Company typically exercises the options only once it is prepared to begin construction. The pre-construction phase for a regional center typically extends over several years and the time to obtain anchor commitments, zoning and regulatory approvals, and public financing arrangements can vary significantly from project to project. In addition, the Company does not intend to begin construction until a sufficient number of anchor stores have agreed to operate in the shopping center, such that the Company is confident that the projected sales and rents from Mall GLA are sufficient to earn a return on invested capital in excess of the Companys cost of capital. Having historically followed these principles, the Companys experience indicates that, on average, less than 10% of the costs of the development of a regional shopping center will be incurred prior to the construction period. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will continue to be able to so limit pre-construction costs. Unexpected costs due to extended zoning and regulatory processes may cause the Companys investment in a project to exceed this historic experience.
While the Company will continue to evaluate development projects using criteria, including financial criteria for rates of return, similar to those employed in the past, no assurances can be given that the adherence to these policies will produce comparable results in the future. In addition, the costs of shopping center development opportunities that are explored but ultimately abandoned will, to some extent, diminish the overall return on development projects (see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Capital Spending for further discussion of the Companys development activities).
Strategic Acquisitions
The Companys objective is to acquire existing centers only when they are compatible with the quality of the Companys portfolio (or can be redeveloped to that level) and that satisfy the Companys strategic plans and pricing requirements.
In March 2003, the Company acquired the 15% minority interest in Great Lakes Crossing, bringing its ownership in the shopping center to 100%.
In October 2002, the Company acquired Swerdlow Real Estate Groups (Swerdlows) 50% interest in Dolphin Mall, bringing its ownership in the shopping center to 100%.
In May 2002, the Operating Partnership acquired a 50% general partnership interest in SunValley Associates, a California general partnership that owns the Sunvalley shopping center located in Concord, California.
Also in May 2002, the Company purchased an additional interest in Arizona Mills. The Company has a 50% interest in the center as of the purchase date.
Expansions of the Centers
Another potential element of growth is the strategic expansion of existing properties to update and enhance their market positions, by replacing or adding new anchor stores or increasing mall tenant space. Most of the centers have been designed to accommodate expansions. Expansion projects can be as significant as new shopping center construction in terms of scope and cost, requiring governmental and existing anchor store approvals, design and engineering activities, including rerouting utilities, providing additional parking areas or decking, acquiring additional land, and relocating anchors and mall tenants (all of which must take place with a minimum of disruption to existing tenants and customers).
5
The following table includes information regarding recent development, acquisition, and expansion activities.
Developments:
| Completion Date |
Center |
Location |
| March 1999 | MacArthur Center | Norfolk, Virginia |
| March 2001 | Dolphin Mall | Miami, Florida |
| August 2001 | The Shops at Willow Bend | Plano, Texas |
| September 2001 | International Plaza | Tampa, Florida |
| October 2001 | The Mall at Wellington Green | Wellington, Florida |
| October 2002 | The Mall at Millenia | Orlando, Florida |
Acquisitions: | ||
| Completion Date |
Center |
Location |
| August 2000 | Twelve Oaks Mall - | Novi, Michigan |
| additional interest (1) | ||
| May 2002 | Sunvalley (2) | Concord, California |
| May 2002 | Arizona Mills | Tempe, Arizona |
| additional interest (3) | ||
| October 2002 | Dolphin Mall | Miami, Florida |
| additional interest (4) | ||
| March 2003 | Great Lakes Crossing | Auburn Hills, Michigan |
| additional interest (5) | ||
Expansions and Renovations: | ||
| Completion Date |
Center |
Location |
| November 1999 | Fairlane (6) | Dearborn, Michigan |
| November 1999 | Biltmore Fashion Park (7) | Phoenix, Arizona |
| February 2000 - September 2000 | Fair Oaks (8) | Fairfax, Virginia |
| May 2000 | Fairlane (9) | Dearborn, Michigan |
| December 2000-2001 | Beverly Center (10) | Los Angeles, California |
| November 2001 | Twelve Oaks Mall (6) | Novi, Michigan |
| November 2001 | Woodland (6) | Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| (1) | In August 2000, the joint venture partners 50% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (2) | In May 2002, a 50% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (3) | In May 2002, an additional 13% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (4) | In October 2002, the joint venture partners 50% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (5) | In March 2003, the joint venture partners 15% interest in the center was acquired. |
| (6) | New food court opened. |
| (7) | Macys expansion completed. |
| (8) | Hechts opened an expansion in February. Additionally, a JCPenney expansion and newly constructed Macys opened in September. |
| (9) | A 21-screen theater opened. |
| (10) | Renovation completed. |
6
Rental Rates
As leases have expired in the centers, the Company has generally been able to rent the available space, either to the existing tenant or a new tenant, at rental rates that are higher than those of the expired leases. In a period of increasing sales, rents on new leases will tend to rise as tenants expectations of future growth become more optimistic. In periods of slower growth or declining sales, rents on new leases will grow more slowly or will decline for the opposite reason. However, center revenues nevertheless increase as older leases roll over or are terminated early and replaced with new leases negotiated at current rental rates that are usually higher than the average rates for existing leases.
The following tables contain certain information regarding per square foot minimum rent at centers that have been owned and open for at least two years.
| 2002 | 2001 | (1) | 2000 | ||||
| Average minimum rent per square foot: | |||||||
| All mall tenants | $41.91 | $41.55 | $39.77 | ||||
| Stores opening during year | $44.10 | $50.46 | $46.21 | ||||
| Square feet of GLA opened | 814,580 | 675,952 | 609,335 | ||||
| Stores closing during year | $42.52 | $40.82 | $40.06 | ||||
| Square feet of GLA closed | 692,790 | 834,101 | 628,013 | ||||
Excluding tenant spaces greater than 10,000 square feet opened in 2002 or 2001:
| 2002 | 2001 | (1) | |||
| Average minimum rent per square foot: | |||||
| All mall tenants | $42.40 | $41.66 | |||
| Stores opening during year | $48.62 | $54.02 | |||
| Square feet of GLA opened | 619,251 | 597,108 | |||
| Stores closing during year (2) | $43.44 | $43.67 | |||
| Square feet of GLA closed | 620,377 | 710,573 | |||
| (1) | Amounts have been restated to include centers comparable to the 2002 statistic. |
| (2) | Excludes spaces greater than 10,000 square feet closed in 2002 or 2001. |
Lease Expirations
The following table shows lease expirations based on information available as of December 31, 2002 for the next ten years for the centers in operation at that date:
Lease Expiration Year |
Number of Leases Expiring |
Leased Area in Square Footage |
Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (in thousands) |
Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases Per Square Foot(1) |
Percent of Total Leased Square Footage Represented by Expiring Leases |
2003 (2) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 |
137 213 247 217 272 312 291 164 447 307 |
504,621 519,880 615,116 581,598 802,500 988,908 905,653 563,469 1,525,931 1,461,696 |
$15,276 23,459 29,136 24,972 31,655 39,626 38,301 24,445 61,404 56,664 |
$30.27 45.12 47.37 42.94 39.45 40.07 42.29 43.38 40.24 38.77 |
4.7% 4.8 5.7 5.4 7.4 9.1 8.4 5.2 14.1 13.5 |
| (1) | A higher percentage of space at value centers is typically rented to major and mall tenants at lower rents than the portfolio average. Excluding value centers, the annualized base rent under expiring leases is greater by a range of $3.06 to $11.91 or an average of $7.10 for the periods presented within this table. |
| (2) | Excludes leases that expire in 2003 for which renewal leases or leases with replacement tenants have been executed as of December 31, 2002. |
7
The Company believes that the information in the table is not necessarily indicative of what will occur in the future because of several factors, but principally because of early lease terminations at the centers. For example, the average remaining term of the leases that were terminated during the period 1997 to 2002 was approximately two years. The average term of leases signed during 2002 and 2001 was approximately eight years.
In addition, mall tenants at the centers may seek the protection of the bankruptcy laws, which could result in the termination of such tenants leases and thus cause a reduction in cash flow. In 2002, approximately 1.7% of leases were so affected compared to 4.5% in 2001. This statistic has ranged from 1.2% to 4.5% since the Company went public in 1992. Since 1991, the annual provision for losses on accounts receivable has been less than 2% of annual revenues.
Occupancy
For centers owned and open for all of 2002 and 2001, leased space, ending occupancy, and average occupancy were 93.4%, 90.2%, and 88.3%, respectively, in 2002, and 91.6%, 88.6%, and 87.9%, respectively, in 2001. Mall tenant average occupancy, ending occupancy, and leased space rates of all centers are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||
Leased Space | 90.3% |
87.7% |
93.8% |
92.1% |
92.3% |
||||||
| Ending Occupancy | 87.0% | 84.0% | 90.5% | 90.4% | 90.2% | ||||||
| Average Occupancy | 84.8% | 84.9% | 89.1% | 89.0% | 89.4% | ||||||
Major Tenants
No single retail company represents 10% or more of the Companys revenues. The combined operations of The Limited, Inc. accounted for approximately 5.3% of Mall GLA as of December 31, 2002 and of 2002 minimum rent. No other single retail company accounted for more than 3% of Mall GLA or 4% of 2002 minimum rent. The following table shows the ten largest tenants and their square footage as of December 31, 2002.
| Tenant | # of Stores |
Square Footage |
% of Mall GLA |
||||
Limited (The Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret) | 74 |
517,725 |
5.3% |
||||
| Gap (Gap, Gap Kids, Banana Republic) | 37 | 280,211 | 2.8 | ||||
| Forever 21 | 15 | 226,584 | 2.3 | ||||
| Foot Locker (Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, Champs Sports) | 44 | 216,270 | 2.2 | ||||
| Williams-Sonoma (Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Pottery Barn Kids) | 24 | 164,455 | 1.7 | ||||
| Abercrombie & Fitch | 22 | 164,030 | 1.7 | ||||
| Retail Brand Alliance (Brooks Brothers, Casual Corner) | 24 | 150,980 | 1.5 | ||||
| Borders Group (Borders, Waldenbooks) | 18 | 131,227 | 1.3 | ||||
| Talbots | 17 | 124,686 | 1.3 | ||||
| Spiegel (Eddie Bauer) | 12 | 99,236 | 1.0 | ||||
8
General Risks of the Company
Economic Performance and Value of Shopping Centers Dependent on Many Factors
The economic performance and value of the Companys shopping centers are dependent on various factors. Additionally, these same factors will influence the Companys decision whether to go forward on the development of new centers and may affect the ultimate economic performance and value of projects under construction (see other risks associated with the development of new centers under Business of the Company Development of New Centers). Such factors include:
| o | changes in the national, regional, and/or local economic and geopolitical climates, |
| o | competition from other shopping centers, discount stores, outlet malls, discount shopping clubs, direct mail, and the internet in attracting customers and tenants, |
| o | increases in operating costs, |
| o | the public perception of the safety of customers at the shopping centers, |
| o | environmental or legal liabilities, |
| o | availability and cost of financing, and |
| o | uninsured losses, whether because of unavailability of coverage or in excess of policy specifications and insured limits, including those resulting from wars, acts of terrorism, riots or civil disturbances, or losses from earthquakes or floods. |
In addition, the value of shopping centers may be adversely affected by:
| o | changes in government regulations, and |
| o | changes in real estate zoning and tax laws. |
Adverse changes in the economic performance and value of shopping centers would adversely affect the Companys income and cash available to pay dividends.
Third Party Interests in the Centers
Some of the shopping centers which the Company develops and leases are partially owned by non-affiliated partners through joint venture arrangements. As a result, the Company may not be able to control all decisions regarding those shopping centers and may be required to take actions that are in the interest of the joint venture partners but not the Companys best interests.
Bankruptcy of Mall Tenants or Joint Venture Partners
The Company could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of third parties. The bankruptcy of a mall tenant could result in the termination of its lease which would lower the amount of cash generated by that mall. In addition, if a department store operating an anchor at one of our shopping centers were to go into bankruptcy and cease operating, its closing may lead to reduced customer traffic and lower mall tenant sales which would, in turn, affect the amount of rent our tenants pay the Company. The profitability of shopping centers held in a joint venture could also be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of one of the joint venture partners if, because of certain provisions of the bankruptcy laws, the Company was unable to make important decisions in a timely fashion or became subject to additional liabilities.
9
Investments in and Loans to Third Parties
The Company occasionally extends credit to third parties in connection with the sales of land or other transactions. The Company has occasionally made investments in marketable and other equity securities. The Company is exposed to risk in the event the values of its investments and/or its loans decrease due to overall market conditions, business failure, and/or other nonperformance by the investees or counterparties.
Third Party Contracts
The Company provides property management, leasing, development, and other administrative services to centers transferred to General Motors pension trusts, other third parties and to certain Taubman affiliates. The contracts under which these services are provided may be canceled or not renewed or may be renegotiated on terms less favorable to the Company. Certain overhead costs allocated to these contracts would not be eliminated if the contracts were to be canceled or not renewed.
Inability to Maintain Status as a REIT
| o | The Company may not be able to maintain its status as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for Federal income tax purposes with the result that the income distributed to shareholders will not be deductible in computing taxable income and instead would be subject to tax at regular corporate rates. Although the Company believes it is organized and operates in a manner to maintain its REIT qualification, many of the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code are very complex and have limited judicial or administrative interpretations. Changes in tax laws or regulations or new administrative interpretations and court decisions may also affect the Companys ability to maintain REIT status in the future. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, its income may also be subject to the alternative minimum tax. If the Company does not maintain its REIT status in any year, it may be unable to elect to be treated as a REIT for the next four taxable years. In addition, if the Company fails to meet the Internal Revenue Codes requirement that it distribute to shareholders at least 90% of its otherwise taxable income, less capital gain income, the Company will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax. The Internal Revenue Code does provide that an additional dividend payment may be declared and paid in the following taxable year so that the Company will be deemed to have distributed at least 90% of its taxable income to shareholders and thereby maintain its REIT status. The 4% excise tax is due and payable on the additional dividend payment made in the succeeding tax year in order to meet the 90% distribution requirement. |
| o | Although the Company currently intends to maintain its status as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax, or other considerations may cause it to determine that it would be in the Companys and its shareholders best interests to revoke its REIT election. As noted above, if the Company revokes its REIT election, it will not be able to elect REIT status for the next four taxable years. |
Environmental Matters
All of the centers presently owned by the Company (not including option interests in certain pre- development projects or any of the real estate managed but not included in the Companys portfolio) have been subject to environmental assessments. The Company is not aware of any environmental liability relating to the centers or any other property, in which they have or had an interest (whether as an owner or operator) that the Company believes, would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, assets, or results of operations. No assurances can be given, however, that all environmental liabilities have been identified or that no prior owner, operator, or current occupant has created an environmental condition not known to the Company. Moreover, no assurances can be given that (1) future laws, ordinances, or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability or that (2) the current environmental condition of the centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants of the centers, by the condition of properties in the vicinity of the centers (such as the presence of underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to the Company.
There are asbestos containing materials (ACMs) at some of the older centers, primarily in the form of floor tiles, roof coatings, and mastics. The floor tiles, roof coatings, and mastics are generally in good condition. The Manager has an operations and maintenance program that details operating procedures with respect to ACMs prior to any renovation and that requires periodic inspection for any change in condition of existing ACMs.
10
Personnel
The Company has engaged the Manager to provide real estate management, acquisition, development, and administrative services required by the Company and its properties.
As of December 31, 2002, the Manager had 1,045 full-time employees. The following table provides a breakdown of employees by operational areas as of December 31, 2002:
Center Operations..................................... Property Management............................... Leasing...................................................... Development............................................. Financial Services..................................... Other......................................................... Total...................................................... |
Number Of Employees 607 193 73 48 67 57 1,045 |
As of January 1, 2002, certain employees, who previously had been employees of affiliates of the Manager, became direct employees of the Manager. The Manager considers its relations with its employees to be good.
Item 2. PROPERTIES.
Ownership
The following table sets forth certain information about each of the centers. The table includes only centers in operation at December 31, 2002. Excluded from this table are Stony Point Fashion Park which will open in 2003, and NorthLake Mall which will open in 2005. Centers are owned in fee other than Beverly Center, Cherry Creek, International Plaza, MacArthur Center, and Sunvalley, which are held under ground leases expiring between 2049 and 2083.
Certain of the centers are partially owned through joint ventures. Generally, the Operating Partnerships joint venture partners have ongoing rights with regard to the disposition of the Operating Partnerships interest in the joint ventures, as well as the approval of certain major matters.
11
| Owned Centers | Anchors | Sq. Ft. of GLA/ Mall GLA as of 12/31/02 |
Year Opened/ Expanded |
Year Acquired |
Ownership % as of 12/31/02 |
Leased Space (1) as of 12/31/02 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arizona Mills Tempe, AZ (Phoenix Metropolitan Area) Beverly Center Los Angeles, CA Biltmore Fashion Park Phoenix, AZ Cherry Creek Denver, CO Dolphin Mall Miami, FL Fair Oaks Fairfax, VA (Washington, DC Metropolitan Area) Fairlane Town Center Dearborn, MI (Detroit Metropolitan Area) Great Lakes Crossing Auburn Hills, MI (Detroit Metropolitan Area) International Plaza Tampa, FL MacArthur Center Norfolk, VA The Mall at Millenia Orlando, FL Regency Square Richmond, VA The Mall at Short Hills Short Hills, NJ Stamford Town Center Stamford, CT Sunvalley Concord, CA (San Francisco Metropolitan Area) |
GameWorks, Harkins Cinemas, JCPenney Outlet, Neiman Marcus- Last Call, Off 5th Saks Bloomingdale's, Macy's Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue Foley's, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue Burlington Coat Factory, Cobb Theatres, Dave & Busters, Oshman's Supersports USA, Off 5th Saks, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus-Last Call (2003) Hecht's, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Macy's Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, Off 5th Saks, Sears Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, GameWorks, Neiman Marcus- Last Call, Off 5th Saks, Star Theatres Dillard's, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom Dillard's, Nordstrom Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman Marcus Hecht's (two locations), JCPenney, Sears Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks Fifth Avenue Filene's, Macy's, Saks Fifth Avenue JCPenney, Macy's (two locations), Sears |
1,227,000/ 521,000 871,000/ 563,000 611,000/ 304,000 1,016,000/ 543,000 (3) 1,296,000/ 632,000 1,583,000/ 567,000 1,525,000/ 635,000 1,376,000/ 567,000 1,223,000/ 581,000 937,000/ 523,000 1,118,000/ 518,000 825,000/ 238,000 1,342,000/ 520,000 861,000/ 368,000 1,317,000/ 477,000 |
1997 1982 1963/1992/ 1997/1999 1990/1998 2001 1980/1987/ 1988/2000 1976/1978/ 1980/2000 1998 2001 1999 2002 1975/1987 1980/1994/ 1995 1982 1967/1981 |
1994 1997 2002 |
50% 70% (2) 100% 50% 100% 50% 100% 85% (4) 26% 70% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% |
95% 98% 95% 99% 80% 93% 88% 89% 92% 88% 96% 95% 99% 86% 93% |
12
| Owned Centers | Anchors | Sq. Ft. of GLA/ Mall GLA as of 12/31/02 |
Year Opened/ Expanded |
Year Acquired |
Ownership % as of 12/31/02 |
Leased Space (1) as of 12/31/02 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Twelve Oaks Mall Novi, MI (Detroit Metropolitan Area) The Mall at Wellington Green Wellington, FL (Palm Beach County) Westfarms West Hartford, CT The Shops at Willow Bend Plano, TX (Dallas Metropolitan Area) Woodland Grand Rapids, MI |
Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, Sears Burdines, Dillard's, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, Nordstrom (2003) Filene's, Filene's Men's Store/ Furniture Gallery, JCPenney, Lord & Taylor, Nordstrom Dillard's, Foley's, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue (2004) Marshall Field's, JCPenney, Sears Total GLA/Total Mall GLA: Average GLA/Average Mall GLA: |
1,192,000/ 454,000 1,109,000/ 417,000 (5) 1,291,000/ 521,000 1,330,000/ 547,000 (6) 1,028,000/ 354,000 23,078,000/ 9,850,000 1,154,000/ 493,000 |
1977/1978 2001 1974/1983/ 1997 2001 1968/1974/ 1984/1989 |
100% 90% 79% 100% 50% |
99% 83% 96% 72% 92% |
| (1) | Leased space comprises both occupied space and space that is leased but not yet occupied. Leased space for value centers (Arizona Mills, Dolphin Mall, and Great Lakes Crossing) includes anchors. |
| (2) | The Company has an option to acquire the remaining 30%. The results of Beverly Center are consolidated in the Companys financial statements. |
| (3) | GLA excludes approximately 166,000 square feet for the renovated buildings on adjacent peripheral land. |
| (4) | In March 2003, the Company acquired the 15% minority interest in Great Lakes Crossing. |
| (5) | GLA excludes Nordstrom and additional mall GLA, which will open in 2003. |
| (6) | GLA excludes Saks Fifth Avenue, which will open in 2004. |
13
Anchors
The following table summarizes certain information regarding the anchors at the operating centers (excluding the value centers) as of December 31, 2002.
Name |
Number of Anchor Stores |
12/31/02 GLA (in thousands) |
% of GLA | |
Dillard's Federated Macy's Burdines Bloomingdale's Total JCPenney May Company Lord & Taylor Hecht's &nbs |