Back to GetFilings.com









UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-K


(Mark One)
size=1>

T ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004



or

* size=1> TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to
________.



Commission file number 1-10981



SBS Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name
of registrant as specified in its charter)



























Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (505)
875-0600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:

Common Stock, no par value
(Title of Class)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [
size=1>P ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [
face="Wingdings 2" size=1>P ] No [ ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-
affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the Common
Stock on August 25, 2004 as reported on The Nasdaq Stock Market® was
$107,364,688. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director as of
August 25, 2004 and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common
Stock according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated
June 30, 2004 have been excluded because these persons may be deemed to be
affiliates.

As of August 25, 2004, Registrant had 15,503,774 shares of
Common Stock outstanding.








DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the registrant's
2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held November 18, 2004 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.













TABLE OF CONTENTS




New Mexico


85-0359415


(State or other jurisdiction of


(IRS Employer


incorporation or organization)


Identification Number)


 


 


2400 Louisiana Blvd. NE, AFC Bldg 5, Suite
600

 

Albuquerque, New Mexico


87110


(Address of principal executive office)


(Zip code)

































































































































 


 



 


 











FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


 


This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operations and business of SBS Technologies,
Inc. and subsidiaries (referred to variously as "SBS," the "Company," "we," "us"
and "our"). You may find many of these statements by looking for words like
"intends," "expects," "projects," "believes," "anticipates" or similar
expressions in this Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements
include:




  • statements regarding future events and the future financial performance
    of SBS;
  • expected sales and gross margin levels for the fiscal year ending June
    30, 2005;
  • expected sales levels for the quarter ending September 30, 2004;
  • expectations of internally-generated cash flows;
  • the continued health of the end markets we serve;
  • the expectation of several government systems design wins to start
    production in fiscal year 2005;
  • the expectation of sales to Applied Materials and Ericsson to continue
    during fiscal year 2005 at the same dollar level as in fiscal year 2004; and

  • new product and business development efforts.




These statements are based upon certain assumptions and assessments made by
the Company in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends,
current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to
be appropriate. These assumptions and assessments include the volume and product
mix of sales, estimates of costs and inventory and receivable levels based on
preliminary information, and other items.


The forward-looking statements included in this document are subject to a
number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Among these factors are:




  • business and economic conditions generally affecting our customers and
    their end customers, including but not limited to the changes in size and
    program priorities of military procurement budgets, which may be less
    favorable than we expect, resulting in lower sales and earnings;
  • a high degree of uncertainty and rapid change in the markets addressed
    by our products that could reduce sales or render certain SBS products
    obsolete, resulting in reduced gross profit levels;
  • customer demand for and acceptance of our products, which may be less
    than we expect, affecting both sales and margins;
  • our ability to design, test and introduce new products on a timely
    basis, which, if we are not able, may decrease both sales and margins;
  • the other risk factors listed under "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in
    this Form 10-K.


Because forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties,
actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by them.
SBS cautions you not to place undue reliance on these statements, which speak
only as of the date of this Form 10-K.


SBS does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.









PART I


Item 1. Business


Introduction


We design and build open-architecture embedded computer
products that enable original equipment manufacturers (OEM) to serve the
government, commercial, and communications end markets. Embedded computer
products are put inside or made part of larger systems to process information,
control machines, move computer data between machines, and interact with people.
The companies that use our products manufacture very sophisticated, expensive
devices, for example, MRI machines, flight simulators, wireless networks,
fighter jets and industrial robots.


The SBS product line is strategically focused on embedded computing, and we
serve virtually all parts of the market. We currently list more than 450
products in the product section of our website, www.sbs.com. We offer components
like input/output (I/O) modules, bus adapters, carrier cards, system enclosures,
FPGA boards and single board computers, as well as network switches, blades and
fully integrated systems. Many of these products are available in ruggedized
versions, which can operate in conditions of extreme temperature, vibration,
shock and humidity.


We serve a broad range of customers. We help our customers get to market
faster, more reliably and more economically, by providing a wide range of
standard and customized embedded computer products. Our products have
application in diverse industries, including space and aviation,
telecommunications, military and government, transportation, telemetry,
robotics, networking, broadcasting, wireless communications and medical imaging.


We have grown because we understand our role in the embedded computing
process: we make components which are part of larger, more complicated devices.
As embedded computer applications expand, we broaden our product line to meet
our customers' needs and to attract new customers. We invest in technology and
customer service so that we can grow with our customers.


We have grown organically and through strategic acquisitions, acquiring
companies that supplement our core competencies - a pattern we expect to
continue. Our organic growth is driven by adding new products, improving
existing products through our research and development program, and attracting
new customers with our products and service. We also completed eleven
acquisitions between 1992 and June 2004 that broadened our product offerings and
our customer base.


SBS Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in New Mexico in November 1986 and
began operations in September 1987. Our executive office is located at 2400
Louisiana Boulevard, NE, AFC Building 5, Suite 600, Albuquerque, New Mexico,
87110, telephone number (505) 875-0600. As of June 30, 2004, SBS Technologies,
Inc. had five direct subsidiaries: SBS Technologies, Inc., Commercial Group
("SBS Commercial"), SBS Technologies, Inc., Government Group ("SBS Government"),
SBS Technologies, Inc., Communications and Enterprise Group ("SBS
Communications"), SBS Technologies, Inc. Foreign Holding Company ("Foreign
Holding"), and SBS Technologies, Inc., German Holdings, LLC ("German Holdings").
In July 2002, the Avionics Products division of SBS was combined with SBS
Government. In September 2002, SBS Technologies, Inc., Industrial Computers, and
SDL Communications, Inc., both of which were formerly subsidiaries of SBS
Technologies, Inc., merged into SBS Technologies, Inc., Communications Products,
a subsidiary of SBS Technologies, Inc., at which time its name was changed to
SBS Technologies, Inc., Communications and Enterprise Group.


In April 2003, German Holdings acquired all of the shares of
SBS Technologies Holding GmbH ("Holding GmbH"), formerly a subsidiary of Foreign
Holding, and all of the shares of SBS or Computers Verwaltungs GmbH
("Verwaltungs"), formerly a subsidiary of Holding GmbH. Later in April 2003,
Holding GmbH was merged into SBS Technologies, GmbH & Co. KG ("KG"),
formerly a subsidiary of Holding GmbH. As a result of the merger, ortec
Electronic Assembly GmbH ("ortec"), formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Holding GmbH, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of KG. KG and Verwaltungs are
subsidiaries of German Holdings. KG is a partnership between German Holdings as
sole limited partner and Verwaltungs as sole general partner.


SBS Technologies (Canada), Inc. ("SBS Canada") is a subsidiary
of Foreign Holding. Effective June 30, 2003, SBS Canada acquired all of the
shares of Avvida Holdings Corp. ("Avvida Holdings"). At that time, Avvida
Systems Inc. ("Avvida Systems") was a subsidiary of Avvida Holdings. In July
2003, both Avvida Systems and Avvida Holdings were amalgamated under Canadian
law into SBS Canada. SBS Technologies Finance LP, a limited partnership, is
owned 99% by Foreign Holding as sole general partner, and 1% by SBS
Technologies, Inc. as sole limited partner.


SBS Technologies (Shenzhen) Limited, a subsidiary of Foreign
Holding, was formed in June 2004.


A chart of our corporate structure follows:





SBS Technologies®, IndustryPack®, Omnispan®, and dataBLIZZARD®
are registered trademarks of SBS. PC MIP® is a registered trademark of MEN
Micro, Inc. of Carrollton, Texas, and SBS. All other trademarks or tradenames
referred to in this document are the property of their respective
owners.


Corporate Governance


We strive to achieve excellence and integrity in all of our
business practices, including corporate governance, oversight, accountability
and transparency. We believe we have incorporated best practices in our
governance, including those currently required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and The Nasdaq Stock Market®. The following are several examples of corporate
governance initiatives implemented by the Company, many dating several years
before the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act:




The following narrative should be read in conjunction with the Section
entitled "Risk Factors."


SBS' Operating Segments


Throughout our fiscal year ended June 30,
2004, we operated worldwide based on geographic markets through two operating
segments: the Americas Group and the Europe Group. These segments enable
management to focus on regional market development, alignment of sales channels
with customers' product needs, and enhancement of customer service and
satisfaction. Each segment has management who report directly to our Chief
Executive Officer and its own sales and distribution channels. The Americas
Group consists of our operations based in the United States and Canada, and most
recently Shenzhen, China. This includes the engineering, test and assembly
activities in Albuquerque, New Mexico; Mansfield, Massachusetts; Newark,
California; Raleigh, North Carolina; St. Paul, Minnesota; and Waterloo, Ontario,
Canada, the manufacturing operations located in St. Paul, Minnesota and the
sales and technical support activities located in Shenzhen, China. The Europe
Group consists of our operations based in Germany, which include the
engineering, test, assembly, and manufacturing activities located in Augsburg
and Mindelheim, Germany. For fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, sales by
operating segments are listed below.





SALES BY SEGMENT
(dollars in millions)

Fiscal years ended
June 30, % of June 30, % of June 30, % of
2004 total 2003 total 2002 total
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- -------

Americas Group.......... $ 97.1 73% $ 94.3 82% $ 106.3 89%
Europe Group............ 36.8 27% 21.2 18% 12.6 11%
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- -------
Total................... $ 133.9 100% $ 115.5 100% $ 118.9 100%
========= ======= ========= ======= ========= =======




See Notes 13 and 14 to SBS' Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information about SBS' operating segments, geographic areas, and
major customers.


Order Backlog


Order backlog expected to be filled within the fiscal year
ending June 2005 was approximately $28.0 million and $14.2 million, as of
September 1, 2004 for the Americas Group and Europe Group, respectively. Our
order backlog represents customer orders that have been contracted for future
delivery. Order backlog as of September 1, 2003 was approximately $19.0 million
and $8.9 million for the Americas Group and Europe Group, respectively. We have
experienced order cancellations and requests for extensions of product shipments
in the past and may continue to experience these cancellations and extensions in
the future. As a result, shipments of current backlog may be delayed or
canceled.


SBS' Products


Both the Americas Group and the Europe Group sell our complete portfolio of
embedded computer products into the government, commercial and communications
end markets. Our product line is strategically focused on open standards
embedded computing, and we serve most parts of the embedded market. We produce
more than 450 standard products which can be combined, configured and customized
in literally thousands of ways.


We offer individual components like Input/Output modules (I/O), bus adapters,
carrier cards, and single board computers, plus network switches, blades and
fully integrated computer systems. Many of these products are available in
ruggedized versions, which can operate in conditions of extreme temperature,
vibration, shock and humidity.


Within our diverse collection of product lines, we offer many different form
factors, including PCI, CompactPCI®, PMC, AMC, Processor PMC, and
Industry Packs. We support our products with software in multiple operating
systems. Our wide selection of single board computers enables a system designer
to choose between multiple processor types, speeds, form factors, memory
configurations, I/O types and rugged build grades. Similarly, our Field
Programmable Gate Array products (FPGAs) allow designers to create custom
processors by programming the hardware to execute their particular
application.


Our I/O products greatly expand the capabilities of our Single Board
Computers by adding additional networking capabilities, by adding more
processing power, by allowing incompatible systems to communicate, by providing
network switching and monitoring capabilities, or by adding more powerful
graphic processing power. Our I/O technologies include popular standards such as
SCSI, iSCSI, IEEE 1394 (Firewire), Ethernet, InfiniBand®, MIL-
STD-1553, Fibre Channel, HIPPI, and telecom standards such as T1/E1/J1, HSSI,
T3/E3, OC-3/STM-1 including HDLC, ATM, SONET, Frame Relay, TDM and IP.


In addition to producing board-level embedded computer products, SBS produces
finished computer systems. This process includes designing and building the
"boxes" the computers are housed in, installing the single board computers and
I/O modules, and testing and certifying the entire system.


We also deliver the software tools that are necessary to integrate our
products into the overall design. This includes drivers, driver development
kits, board support packages, protocol stack and specialized tools for specific
markets.


Customers and Applications


Our broad range of products is used by a diversified OEM customer base
serving the government, commercial and communications end markets. Our products
are used in a variety of applications in diverse industries including space and
aviation, telecommunications, military and government, transportation,
telemetry, robotics, networking, broadcasting, wireless communications and
medical imaging. In fiscal year 2004, one customer (Applied Materials)
represented 10% of our total sales and in 2003 and 2002, no one customer equaled
or exceeded 10% of our sales. OEMs serving the communications market use our
products in applications such as wireless base station controllers, optical
switches, routers and network monitoring, and security applications. OEMs
serving the commercial market use our products primarily to build products that
are used in semiconductor manufacturing, industrial automation, medical imaging,
and entertainment applications. Examples of these applications include
semiconductor manufacturing equipment, CT scan and MRI equipment, automotive
manufacturing and test equipment, test and measurement equipment, industrial
automation equipment, commercial aircraft flight simulators, and audio mixing
and video authoring equipment. OEMs serving the government market use our
products in mission critical components in fighter aircraft and ground vehicles,
flight and ground simulation, electronic system test solutions, and data link
and command and control applications. Examples of these applications include
systems and equipment for military aircraft, military ground vehicles, navy
vessels, telemetry equipment, and space exploration applications.


Sales and Marketing


We market our products both domestically and internationally utilizing a
combination of direct employee sales personnel, independent manufacturers'
representatives, and distributors. As of August 1, 2004, we had 92 employees,
who typically hold engineering degrees, in sales, marketing and customer
relations, 17 U.S.-based independent manufacturers' representatives and 35
distributors located outside the U.S. Within North America, our direct employee
sales personnel are deployed regionally throughout the U.S. and Canada as sales
specialists in our traditional markets. Within Europe, as of August 1, 2004, we
have direct employee sales personnel located in the United Kingdom, Sweden,
France, and Germany.
Sales
into the Asian markets are primarily through distributors supported by our
employees of SBS Technologies (Shenzhen) Limited. Domestically and
internationally, the direct employee sales personnel are supported by field
application engineers, who provide pre-sale technical support to our customers,
and business development personnel, who specialize in our traditional markets of
commercial, government and communications. We serve a diverse set of large and
small customers. In order to gain access to this diverse customer base, we use
all available selling channels. Domestically, the direct employee sales
personnel generally sell to larger OEM accounts, while manufacturers'
representatives sell to smaller accounts. Internationally, our direct employee
sales personnel sell to larger OEM accounts, and independent distributors sell
to smaller accounts. All quoting, pricing and final order acceptance for all
sales are controlled by the responsible product line manager.


We maintain our primary sales and support offices in Albuquerque, New Mexico;
Raleigh, North Carolina; Mansfield, Massachusetts; St. Paul, Minnesota;
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Augsburg, Germany; and Shenzhen, China. Sales and
sales leads are generated through a range of activities, including direct sales
calls, identification of participants in key defense and government related
programs, participation in numerous trade shows, direct mail catalogs,
advertisements in leading trade publications, and our web site.


Research and Development


We invest in research and development programs to develop new products in
related markets and to integrate state of the art technology into existing
products. As of August 1, 2004, we had approximately 155 employees engaged in
research and development activities. Of these employees, 82 have technical
degrees and 36 have advanced degrees. We seek to combine special- purpose
hardware, firmware and software in our products to provide our customers with
the desired functionality. Our research and development expense was $20.6
million, $18.1 million, and $18.5 million in fiscal year 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively, corresponding to 15.4%, 15.6%, and 15.5% of sales,
respectively.


We have several trademarks and have one pending application for another.
However, we have generally sought only limited patent protection for our
technology. Currently, we have only six U.S. patents issued and two Canadian
patents issued, expiring December 2013 through October 2021. We primarily rely
on trade secrets for protection of our intellectual property and believe that
future financial performance is much more dependent on the timely introduction
of new products and technology and our customer relationships than protection of
our intellectual property.


With a product line of over 450 different products, a portion of our research
and development efforts is focused on sustaining and improving the existing
products. In addition, we continue to develop new standard products for all of
our markets, as well as adding new technologies to our product line. For fiscal
year 2004, we released thirty-seven new products to the marketplace. In our
single board computer product line we introduced the CT9, CR9 and CP9 Intel®
Pentium M® based compact PCI cards as well as the VR9 VME bus Pentium M card.
For 3U compact PCI we introduced the CR3 and CA3 Intel Ultra Low Voltage
Celeron® processor card. These cards are designed to be used for all of our
markets and are available in air cooled as well as conduction cooled
configurations. A new technology, FPGA centric computer platforms, was added to
the single board computer family in fiscal year 2004. The first FPGA product was
a PCI-based card and the second was an FPGA-based PC104 card. In addition to
releasing new single board computers, we also released new versions of packaged
systems. We released the ruggedized PC7 Intel Pentium III® based industrial
control computer. The PC7R is dustproof and waterproof and is designed to be
used in harsh environments. We also released the new advanced mission computer
product that is one of the only off-the-shelf standard computers available that
can be used for military flight and mission computer applications. The advanced
mission computers are available in 3U and 6U cPCI, and 6U VME, and are fully
qualified for military programs.


In fiscal year 2004, we expanded our I/O products by increasing our Ethernet
product line with two cPCI Ethernet switches and two new gigabit Ethernet PMC
cards. We also extended our conduction cooled I/O product family by adding a
fibre channel PMC, a 1394 PMC card, a 12 channel 3U cPCI serial card, an 8
channel PMC serial card, an audio PMC card and six new MIL-STD-1553 cards in
PMC, cPCI and PCI formats. As a provider of high performance I/O solutions, we
also expanded our InfiniBand product line with a twenty-four port switch and two
new host bus adapter cards, one in PCI format and the other a PMC card. We
extended our SCSI product line by introducing a new Ultra SCSI PMC card and
adding an iSCSI PMC card, which is an internet-connected SCSI interface. To
expand our I/O products for military systems applications, we also developed and
released a new line of FPGA I/O cards in cPCI and VME formats that provide
analog, digital, serial and custom I/O required for military applications.


For our I/O products aligned with communications applications, we released
the Maxim 921-DS PMC card that provides full duplex DS3 connectivity. In
addition, we developed new variants of our Wanic T1/E1 Serial monitoring cards
and Maxim 524 T1/E1 cards, extended the Maxim 520 family to support rear panel
I/O, and developed several customer specific wide area network cards that will
be available as standard products. A major initiative was started in fiscal year
2004 to provide Advanced Mezzanine Cards (AMC) for Advanced Telecom Computing
Architecture (ATCA) carrier cards. The first AMC product is the Telum 1001 which
provides OC-3 connectivity.


During fiscal year 2004, we expanded our software support of real-time Linux,
UNIX and Microsoft Windows® operating systems by adding drivers and new board
support packages to support our new single board computers. We also released a
development environment to support developing applications for our FPGA-based
products.


Suppliers


We use contract manufacturing to produce substantially all of our U.S.-built
board-level products. We obtain parts from large electronics parts suppliers and
printed circuit boards from printed circuit board manufacturers and provide
these parts and boards as kits to contract manufacturing companies that
fabricate our products. Following manufacturing, we perform test, packaging and
support functions for our products. We have two manufacturing facilities, St.
Paul, Minnesota and Mindelheim, Germany. We have begun complete turnkey
outsourcing to contract manufacturers, although it is for a small portion of our
total production. We reduce our dependence on a single contract manufacturer by
using multiple contract manufacturers for many of our products.


Our German operation manufactures approximately 45% of its board-level
products at its facility in Mindelheim, Germany, and uses contract manufacturers
for the remainder of its manufacturing, consisting primarily of OEM production
business and certain ruggedized and military applications.


Competition


The embedded computer industry is highly competitive and fragmented, and our
competitors differ depending on product type, company size, geographic market
and application type. Consolidation within the communications, capital equipment
and defense industries has resulted in increased competition and may result in
an increase in pricing pressure across our product lines. We believe we
differentiate ourselves from our competition based on the following:




  • broad product line,
  • willingness to adapt products to customer needs (customization),
  • after sale support, and
  • long-term customer relationships.


Our competition in each of our product lines is described below.


Our CPU product line competes against other suppliers of CPU boards based on
PowerPC® and Intel microprocessor technology, including GE Fanuc Embedded
Systems, Kontron AG, Motorola, Inc., Performance Technologies, Incorporated,
RadiSys Corporation, and others. In the ruggedized computer board and system
market primarily serving military customers, our main competitors are Curtiss-
Wright Corporation and Radstone Technologies PLC.


Our WAN I/O products compete with other suppliers of similar products within
the embedded computer market. They include companies such as Interphase
Corporation, Performance Technologies, Incorporated, and SBE, Inc.


Our general purpose I/O products are standards-based I/O modules for
technologies such as Ethernet, Fibre Channel, and Serial. Among our competitors
for these products are Acromag, Inc., Curtiss-Wright Corporation, GE Fanuc
Embedded Systems, and a few small companies. Specialized products such as bus
adapters and dataBLIZZARD have no direct competitors. Our InfiniBand technology
products compete with Infinicon Systems, Inc., and a number of small start-up
companies serving that market.


Our avionics interface products compete with those of other companies such as
Ballard Technologies, Inc., Condor Engineering, Inc., Data Devices Corporation,
Excalibur Technologies Corporation, and Gesellschaft Fur Angewandte Informatik
und Mikroelekemik GmbH.


SBS Canada designs FPGA computing products that apply FPGA technology to
processing applications often associated with DSP boards or single board
computers. We compete with companies offering these technologies like Mercury
Computer Systems, and imaging companies such as Matrox Graphics Inc., as well as
a few small companies with FPGA products such as Annapolis Micro Systems,
Inc.


Our systems and enclosure products compete with other suppliers of special
purpose PC and CompactPCI platforms, enclosures and turnkey systems, such as
Motorola, Inc. and RadiSys Corporation.


Employees


As of August 1, 2004, we had approximately 472 employees at our nine
locations: Albuquerque, New Mexico; Newark, California; Raleigh, North Carolina;
St. Paul, Minnesota; Mansfield, Massachusetts; Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;
Shenzhen, China; and Augsburg and Mindelheim, Germany. Of these employees, 66
were in executive and administrative positions; 92 were in sales, marketing and
customer relations; 155 were in research and development; 148 were employed in
support of ongoing production, and 11 were employed on a part-time
basis.


Risk Factors


Statements in this Report about the outlook for our business and markets,
such as projections of future performance, statements of management's plans and
objectives, and forecasts of market trends and other matters, are forward-
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual
results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking
statements. Factors that may cause such a difference, and may impact our future
financial performance, include, but are not limited to, those discussed
below:


Risks Related to Our Business


Our period to period sales and operating results have fluctuated, and may
continue to fluctuate significantly, which has caused, and may continue to
cause, volatility in the market price for our common stock.
Our Company
has experienced fluctuations in its period to period sales and operating results
in the past, and management expects that fluctuations will occur in the future.
Our sales, on both an annual and a quarterly basis, can fluctuate as a result of
a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control and which we may not
be able to predict. These factors include:




  • the timing and volume of customer orders and delays,
  • success in achieving design wins in which our products are designed into
    those of our customers,
  • manufacturing delays,
  • delays in shipment due to component shortages,
  • cancellations of orders,
  • changes in the mix of products sold,
  • the rate of introduction of new products,
  • ability to maintain appropriate inventory levels,
  • excess or obsolete inventory and changes in valuation of inventory,
  • cyclicality or downturns in the markets served by our customers,
    including significant reductions in defense, communications and capital
    equipment expenditures,
  • political, legal, regulatory and economic conditions and developments in
    the areas of the world in which we operate or into which we might expand our
    operations,
  • competition from new technologies and other companies,
  • variations in sales channels, product costs and the mix of products
    sold, and
  • economic disruptions due to terrorist activity or epidemics.


Because fluctuations in operating results have happened in the past, and may
continue to happen in the future, we believe that comparisons of the results of
our operations for preceding quarters and fiscal years are not necessarily
meaningful, and that investors should not rely on the results for any one
quarter or year as an indication of how the Company will perform in the future.
Investors should also understand that, if our sales or earnings for any quarter
or year are less than the level expected by securities analysts or the market in
general, the market price for the Company's common stock has been in the past,
and may be, in the future, subject to an immediate and significant
decline.


Our sales have been, and may in the future be, significantly reduced due to
volatile communications and capital equipment markets.
We derive a
significant portion of our sales from products for communications and capital
equipment applications. The communications and capital equipment markets are
characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change. The
communications market grew rapidly in the late 1990's, but experienced depressed
conditions during recent years, from which a recovery appears to have begun. For
example, our sales into that market dropped by over 60% between our fiscal year
2001 and fiscal year 2002 and by another 30% from fiscal year 2002 to fiscal
year 2003 before staging some recovery in fiscal year 2004. The volatility of
the communications market over recent years could result in a future dramatic
downturn in areas of the communications market targeted by us, such as wireless
telephony and network monitoring, resulting in reductions in sales into that
market.


 Our future sales may be limited if anticipated increases in U.S.
defense spending do not occur, if defense spending in the U.S. and other
countries is reduced or not allocated in a way that benefits us, or if U.S.
military actions result in reluctance by customers outside of the U.S. to
purchase our products
. We derive a significant portion of our sales
directly or indirectly from the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). The majority
of our government sales are to contractors in U.S. Government military programs
for either new military systems or upgrades of existing military platforms.
These sales may be affected by changes in procurement policies, budget
considerations, changing defense requirements, and political developments. The
influence of these factors, which are largely beyond our control, could impact
our financial position or results of operations.


The President's budget for the DoD for fiscal year 2005 and beyond responds
to increased needs for homeland security and combating terrorism. This is
evidenced by budget increases for operation readiness and personnel needs, as
well as for both procurement and research and development. This trend was
reiterated in the Future Year Defense Plan (FYDP) submitted with the President's
budget for fiscal year 2005. It projects sustained growth in both the
procurement and research and development budgets for the DoD through fiscal year
2006, and in the case of the procurement budgetary authority, through fiscal
year 2009. While there is no assurance that the increased DoD budget levels will
be approved by Congress, the current U.S. defense budget outlook appears to be
one of modest growth. However, the level and sustainability of growth and the
amount of the budget that will ultimately be allocated to programs most closely
aligned with our business, such as new military systems and upgrades of existing
military platforms, is unknown, particularly in light of: 




  • current record U.S. government budget deficits, and
  • increased expenditures on operations and maintenance arising from
    conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other locations, which typically do not
    benefit our business.


In addition, non-U.S. defense budgets have generally been declining over the
past decade. This has resulted in consolidation in the European aerospace
industry. This type of environment could reduce opportunities, and increase
competition and pricing pressure, for sales of SBS products into non-U.S.
government markets. Further, international backlash against United States
government policy decisions relating to terrorism, the conflicts in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and other international events may result in reluctance in certain
foreign countries to buy products from companies, like SBS, headquartered in the
United States.


We must persuade customers to outsource their component needs to grow our
business.
Many of our potential customers design and manufacture
embedded computer components internally, which they may view as a cost-savings
over purchasing these components from suppliers like SBS. To increase our sales,
we need to persuade them that use of our components and services is cost-
effective.


Increased market acceptance of our products also depends on a number of other
factors, including:




  • the quality of our design and production expertise,
  • the increasing use and complexity of embedded computer systems in new
    and traditional products,
  • the expansion of markets that are served by embedded computers,
  • time to market requirements of our products,
  • the assessment by our customers of direct and indirect cost savings, and

  • our customers' willingness to rely on us for mission-critical
    applications.


Any failure to persuade customers to outsource their embedded computer needs
could reduce our future revenues and earnings.


We face significant competition. The embedded computer industry is
highly competitive and fragmented, and is in the process of consolidating, such
as the recently announced acquisition of Force Computers, Inc. by Motorola Inc.
Our competitors differ depending on product and market type, company size,
geographic market and application type. We face competition in each of our
product lines.


Competition in all of our product lines is based on:




  • performance,
  • time-to-market,
  • customer support,
  • product longevity,
  • existing customer relationships,
  • supplier stability,
  • price,
  • breadth of product offerings, and
  • reliability.


Many of our existing and potential competitors are companies larger than we
are that have a number of significant advantages over us, including:




  • significantly greater financial, technological and marketing resources,
    giving them the ability to respond more quickly to new or changing
    opportunities, technologies and customer requirements,
  • established relationships with customers or potential customers, which
    can make it harder for us to sell our products to those customers,
  • a longer operating history, and
  • more extensive name recognition and marketing capability.


In addition, existing or potential competitors may establish cooperative
relationships with each other or with third parties, or adopt aggressive pricing
policies to gain market share.


Because of increased competition, we might encounter significant pricing
pressures across our product lines. These pricing pressures could result in
significantly lower average selling prices and reduced profit margins for our
products. We may not be able to offset the effects of any price reductions with
an increase in the number of our customers, cost reductions or otherwise. We
cannot assure investors that we will be able to compete effectively in our
current or future markets.


If we do not persuade OEM's to use our products instead of those of other
suppliers, our sales could be harmed.
Our sales depend, in part, on our
ability to obtain and maintain design wins for our products from OEM's. OEM's
that do not currently integrate our components into their products may not be
willing to purchase components from us because the cost of integrating new
components into their products may be more expensive than continuing to use
existing components. OEM's currently using our components often re-bid for next-
generation components and may elect to use another supplier's components if the
other supplier's designs are superior to our designs. Also, OEM's currently
integrating our components may redesign their products in a manner that no
longer requires our components. If we fail to maintain existing design wins or
to achieve new design wins, our sales could be reduced.


We might have to expend substantial funds to redesign our products because of
changes in industry standards, customer preferences or technology.
Most
of our products are developed to meet industry standards that define the basis
of compatibility in operation and communication of a system supported by
different vendors. These standards are continuing to develop. If these standards
are eliminated, changed, or are superseded with more advanced technologies, the
design of our products could be inappropriate or obsolete, and we could be
required to undertake costly redesign and research and development efforts. Our
sales also depend in part on our ability to develop state of the art products
that comport with changing customer preferences. We may not be successful in
developing these products in a timely manner, or in selling the products we
develop. Our sales could significantly decrease, and our products could become
obsolete, if we fail to adapt timely to changing industry standards, advances in
technology, or customer preferences.


We purchase many of our components from third party suppliers who may
discontinue or change their products or have insufficient supply.
Many
of our products contain state-of-the-art electronic components, such as
microprocessors and memory technology. We depend upon third parties for our
supply of many of these components. We obtain some of these components from a
sole supplier or a limited number of suppliers, for which alternate sources may
be difficult to locate. We have experienced, and may experience in the future,
component part shortages, and we have in the past built, and may in the future
build, inventory of these components. Moreover, suppliers may discontinue or
upgrade some of the products incorporated into our products, which could require
us to redesign a product to incorporate newer or alternative technology. Our
inventory of component parts may become obsolete, which has in the past and may
in the future result in write-downs. Although we believe that we have arranged
for an adequate supply of components to meet our short-term requirements, we do
not routinely obtain long-term binding contracts with our suppliers to assure
future availability. If sufficient components are not available when we need
them, our product shipments could be delayed, which could adversely affect our
sales during certain periods as well as lead to customer dissatisfaction. If
enough components are unavailable, we might have to pay premiums for parts in
order to make shipment deadlines. Paying premiums for parts, building inventory
of scarce parts, or having our existing inventory become obsolete could lower or
eliminate our profit margin, reduce our cash flow, and otherwise harm our
financial performance.


We use contract manufacturers to produce the bulk of our board-level products
and are dependent on their timeliness, quality, and availability.
We
obtain parts from large electronics parts suppliers and printed circuit boards
from printed circuit board manufacturers and provide these parts and boards as
kits to contract manufacturing companies that fabricate our products. Many of
the contract manufacturers we utilize are small companies with limited capital
resources. We reduce dependence on a particular contract manufacturer by using
multiple contract manufacturers for many of our products, although there is no
assurance that we will not experience delays in obtaining product from contract
manufacturers. If we must move our production to new contract manufacturers due
to non-performance by current contract manufacturers, additional delays in
obtaining product could be incurred, as qualifying new contract manufacturers is
costly and time-consuming. If we are unable to meet our customers' delivery
requirements due to delays in obtaining product from contract manufacturers, our
sales and results of operations could be materially reduced. We also use
contract manufacturers with operations in low-cost locations, such as Asia.
Those products may be subject to shipping and other delays resulting from the
location of those fabrication facilities. These manufacturers are also subject
to political, economic and regulatory risk similar to those arising from our
international sales and operations generally, as described on page 13.


We often incur substantial expense and development time well in advance of
sales, requiring accurate gauging of future market demand.
Our business
depends upon continually introducing new and enhanced products and solutions for
business needs. The development or adaptation of products and technologies
requires us to commit financial resources, personnel and time significantly in
advance of sales. In order to compete, our decisions with respect to those
commitments must accurately anticipate both future demand and the technologies
that will win market acceptance to meet that demand. In addition, our customers
typically require several months to test and evaluate our products before
designing their products to incorporate our components. Once our customers have
decided to use our components, it may take up to 18 months or longer to begin
volume production of products incorporating these components. Because of this
lengthy sales cycle, we may experience delays from the time we increase our
operating expenses and our investments in inventory until the time that we
generate sales from these components. We may never generate sales from
components after incurring development expenses if our customers decide not to
purchase them. Even if our customers select our components to incorporate into
their products, our customers may not be able to market or sell their products
successfully.


We are subject to order and shipment uncertainties that could harm our
operating results.
We typically sell our products pursuant to purchase
orders that customers can cancel or defer delivery on short notice without
incurring a significant penalty. Cancellations or deferrals could cause us to
hold excess inventory that may not be salable to other customers at commercially
reasonable terms, and which could reduce our profit margins, require inventory
write downs, and restrict our ability to fund our operations. This risk is
exacerbated by a current trend from our customers of requiring shorter lead
times between placing an order with us and the shipment date. That typically
necessitates an increase in our inventory of that product, raising the
likelihood that upon cancellation or deferral, we may be holding greater amounts
of inventory.


We have limited patent protection covering our technology, and we may not be
able to protect our intellectual property. Disputes could be expensive.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and protect our
intellectual property. We have sought only limited patent protection for our
technology. We currently have six U.S. patents and two Canadian patents issued
and no U.S. patents pending. We cannot guarantee that our existing patents will
be enforced in a court of law if challenged. Patent applications in the United
States are not publicly disclosed until the patents are issued.


We primarily rely on trade secret laws, industrial know-how and
confidentiality agreements with employees, customers, distributors and vendors
to protect our intellectual property and believe that future financial
performance is much more dependent on the timely introduction of new products
and technology and our customer relationships than protection of our
intellectual property. Third parties or employees may breach those
confidentiality agreements or otherwise attempt to disclose, obtain or use our
products and technologies.


We enter into contracts with OEM's which typically provide for broad
indemnification of the OEM's against allegations of infringements of
intellectual property rights arising from our products, including costs of
defense. We do not carry insurance covering any such claims. Any such claim or
claims could materially harm our financial condition.


We may have to litigate to enforce or defend our intellectual property
rights. Any litigation, regardless of outcome, may be costly and time consuming.
Further, if it were ultimately determined that our claimed intellectual property
rights are unenforceable, or that our products infringe on the rights of others,
we may be required to pay past royalties or obtain licenses to use technologies.
We may not be able to obtain licenses for these technologies on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all.


General business conditions are vulnerable to the effects of epidemics, which
could materially disrupt our operations and financial results
. Our
Company is vulnerable to the general economic effects of epidemics and other
health-related concerns. In mid-2003, the outbreak of the SARS epidemic resulted
in quarantines and substantial curtailment of travel and business activities for
areas as geographically diverse as China and Toronto, Ontario. During that time,
the epidemic disrupted sales activities of SBS Canada with a significant
customer in China. We believe that many growth opportunities for current and
future SBS products are located in Asia and other parts of the world where
public health systems are not considered to be as advanced as in North America
and Western Europe. Further, we have significant customers, and significant end-
customers of our customers, located in Asia, including China, which are areas
SBS has specifically targeted for growth. A recurrence of SARS or any other
epidemic could substantially reduce or delay regional or worldwide demand for
our products, or disrupt supply channels, which could materially impact our
future results of operations.


Risks Related to Our Financial Condition


Our success depends, in part, on our ability to identify, acquire and
successfully integrate new businesses.
A major element of our business
strategy is to pursue acquisitions that either expand or complement our
business. We have increased the scope of our operations through eleven
acquisitions since 1992, including the June 2003 acquisition of Avvida Systems,
now SBS Canada. Where business conditions permit, we intend to actively pursue
acquisition opportunities whenever they arise. This acquisition strategy may
pose additional risks to us, including:




  • We might not be able to identify or acquire acceptable acquisition
    candidates on favorable terms, and in a timely manner.
  • Our management, financial controls, internal controls over financial
    reporting, personnel, and other corporate support systems might not be
    adequate to manage the increase in the size and the diversity of scope of
    our operations as a result of acquisitions and to effectively integrate
    acquired businesses.
  • Our acquisitions might not increase revenue or earnings, and the
    companies acquired might not continue to perform at their historical or
    anticipated levels.
  • We may use cash for acquisitions that would otherwise be available to
    fund our operations or to use for other corporate purposes.
  • Our shareholders may experience dilution if we use the Company's capital
    stock to pay for acquisitions.
  • We may incur debt to pay for acquisitions, resulting in interest costs
    and reduced earnings.


We may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations and to
complete acquisitions.
We depend on cash flow from operations to fund
our operations and pay for our acquisitions. If we experience decreased sales,
increased expenses, or a combination of the two, we may need to raise additional
capital to fund our operations or acquire other businesses. If we decide to do
so, we could attempt to issue debt securities or capital stock. We may not be
able to sell these securities under then current market conditions. Even if we
were successful in finding buyers for our securities, the buyers could demand
commercially unreasonable terms. For example, if we had to sell debt securities,
we might be forced to pay high interest rates or agree to onerous operating
covenants, which could in turn harm our ability to operate our business by
reducing our cash flow and restricting our operating activities. If we were to
sell the Company's capital stock, we might be forced to sell shares at a
depressed market price, which could result in dilution to our existing
shareholders. In addition, any shares of capital stock we may issue may have
rights, privileges, and preferences superior to those of our common
shareholders. If we are unable to raise additional capital on commercially
reasonable terms, we may be required to reduce our operations and delay or
terminate any potential acquisition plans, which would harm our ability to
grow.


If our sales do not increase, or if they decline, we could experience
difficulty in obtaining debt or equity financing.
Contraction and
declines in the markets we serve have had and may in the future have an adverse
impact on our sales and income. We currently do not have any bank credit
facility in place. We may require external financing in the future, and that
financing may not be available on terms acceptable to management or at all. In
the future, if our sales do not increase, or if they decline, it would likely
impede our ability to raise funds through the sale of debt or equity securities.


Our future results are subject to the efficiency of our past and future
consolidation efforts.
We have consolidated operations in the past,
including Communications and Enterprise Group operating facilities previously
based in Madison, Wisconsin, and Carlsbad, California. These consolidations
included moving manufacturing, testing and support functions to the St. Paul,
Minnesota, facility, and moving certain product design functions to the
Mansfield, Massachusetts and Raleigh, North Carolina facilities in fiscal years
2003 and 2004. We may elect to consolidate other operations in the future.
Failure to effect a consolidation efficiently could result in missed customer
deliveries, higher costs, reductions in quality, and lost productivity on other
important projects, any of which could adversely affect our future results of
operations.


Our earnings have been, and could in the future be, adversely affected
because of charges resulting from acquisitions, or an acquisition could reduce
shareholder value.
As part of our strategy for growth, we acquire
compatible businesses. In accounting for a newly acquired business, we are, in
many cases, required to amortize, over a period of years, certain identifiable
intangible assets. Although the acquired business' current operating profit may
offset the amortization expense, a decrease in the acquired business' operating
profit could reduce our overall net income and earnings per share. Changes in
future markets or technologies may require us to amortize intangible assets
faster and in such a way that our overall financial condition or results of
operations are harmed. If economic and/or business conditions decline in the
future, we may incur impairment charges against earnings which could be
significant. We may also be required, under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, to charge against earnings upon
consummation of an acquisition the value of an acquired business' technology
that does not meet the accounting definition of "completed technology." Acquired
businesses could also reduce shareholder value if they generate a net loss or
require invested capital.


We may expend resources without receiving benefit from strategic alliances
with third parties.
From time to time, we enter into strategic alliances
to deliver solutions to our customers. These alliances are typically formed to
provide products or services that we do not provide in our core businesses. We
may expend capital and resources on these alliances but may not receive any
immediate or long-term return or economic benefit from them, thereby reducing
our sales and earnings.


We depend on our employees for success. Our ability to maintain our
competitive position and to develop and market new products depends, in part,
upon our ability to retain key employees and to recruit and retain additional
qualified personnel, particularly engineers. Competition for qualified employees
in the computer industry is intense. In addition, we have traditionally relied
in large part on granting of stock options as incentive compensation to recruit
and retain qualified personnel. If proposed changes to accounting standards that
require us to expense the fair value of stock option grants results in a
reduction or elimination of future stock option awards to our employees, we
could have difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified persons. If we are
unable to retain and recruit key employees, our product development, and
marketing and sales could be harmed.


We are subject to product liability risk. Our products and services
could subject us to product liability or government or commercial warranty
claims. We maintain primary product liability insurance for our non- aviation
products with a general aggregate limit of $1.0/$2.0 million per occurrence and
a $50.0 million excess umbrella policy. We maintain, for our aviation products,
a $100.0 million liability insurance policy, per occurrence. Our products are
widely used in a variety of applications. If a claim is made against us, our
insurance coverage might not be adequate to pay for our defense or to pay for
any award, in which case we would have to pay for it. Also, in the future we
might not be able to continue our insurance coverage at desired levels for
premiums acceptable to us. If a litigant were successful against us, a lack or
insufficiency of insurance coverage could significantly harm our financial
condition.


We face political, economic and regulatory risks associated with our
international sales and operations not faced by businesses operating only in the
United States.
We sell our products in countries throughout the world
from our United States, Canadian and German based operations. We intend to
continue to expand our operations and sales outside the United States and have
specifically targeted Asia, in addition to Europe, for future growth. Consistent
with that policy, we opened our sales support and customer support office in
Shenzhen, China in June 2004. Our international operations and sales subject the
Company to risks not experienced by companies operating only in the United
States, including:




  • increased governmental regulations,
  • export and import controls,
  • political, economic and other uncertainties, including, risk of war,
    revolution, terrorist attacks, epidemics, expropriation, renegotiation or
    modification of existing contracts, standards and tariffs, and taxation
    policies,
  • international monetary fluctuations that may make payment more expensive
    for foreign customers who may, as a result, limit or reduce purchases,
  • exposure to different and inconsistent legal standards, particularly
    with respect to intellectual property,
  • longer accounts receivable collection cycles,
  • trade disputes or new trading policies that could limit, reduce, disrupt
    or eliminate our sales and business prospects outside the United States, and

  • unexpected changes in regulatory requirements that impose multiple
    conflicting tax laws and regulations.


Those risks could reduce our sales and earnings in the future.


Exchange rate fluctuations could reduce our earnings when stated in U.S.
Dollars.
Substantially all of our U.S. export sales transactions to date
have been denominated in United States dollars and substantially all sales
transactions of our Germany operation have been denominated in Euros. Due to the
transfer of all sales and support of European customers to our European
operation and the recent growth in sales experienced by our European operation,
a growing percentage of our overall sales transactions has been denominated in
Euros. Some sales in the future may be denominated in other currencies,
including the Canadian dollar. Any decline in the value of other currencies in
which we make sales against the United States dollar, the Canadian dollar or the
Euro, or any decline in the value of the Canadian dollar or the Euro against the
United States dollar, will have the effect of decreasing our consolidated
earnings when stated in United States dollars. In the future, we may engage in
hedging transactions to minimize the effect of the risks associated with these
types of currency fluctuations; however, such hedging transactions could
adversely impact our financial position and results of operations.


Risks Related to Our Securities


Our common stock price can be volatile because of several factors, including
a limited public float.
During the twelve-month period ended June 30,
2004, the sales price of our common stock fluctuated between $9.17 and $19.46
per share. We believe that the Company's common stock is subject to wide price
fluctuations because of several factors, including:




  • quarterly and annual fluctuations in our operating results,
  • a relatively thin trading market for our common stock, which causes
    trades of small blocks of stock to have a significant impact on the
    Company's stock price,
  • announcements of new technologies by us, our competitors or customers,
  • general conditions in the markets we serve,
  • fluctuations in earnings of our competitors,
  • changes in earnings estimates or investment recommendations by
    securities analysts,
  • general volatility of the stock markets and the market prices of other
    publicly traded companies,
  • economic disruptions due to terrorist activity,
  • investor sentiment regarding equity markets generally, including public
    perception of corporate ethics and governance and the accuracy and
    transparency of financial reporting, and
  • investor sentiment regarding the valuation of technology companies
    generally.


A lower stock value for SBS could make it more difficult to raise, or
preclude us from raising, capital through sales of stock or other securities or
obtaining debt financing.



Item 2. Properties


We lease office and manufacturing space in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Newark,
California, Raleigh, North Carolina, St. Paul, Minnesota, Mansfield,
Massachusetts, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Augsburg and Mindelheim, Germany and
Shenzhen, China. We are also obligated under a lease for our former facility in
Carlsbad, California, which we vacated in August 2003 and have subleased to a
third party throughout the remaining term of the lease. Our standard practice is
to obtain all of our facilities through operating leases. We maintain an
insurance plan covering all our facilities and contents.


The Albuquerque, New Mexico leased facility consists of approximately 42,500
square feet located in a multi-floor office building. This facility houses
certain sales, engineering and support functions for SBS Government, a part of
the Americas Group segment. The Albuquerque facility also serves as our
corporate headquarters. The lease term runs through June 30, 2005. We believe
that this facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through June 2005.
Effective July 2004, we executed a lease for a one-story build-to-suit facility
consisting of approximately 47,500 square feet. The term of the lease, which
commences upon the later of substantial completion of construction or May 1,
2005, will run for a period of approximately 122 months expiring June 2015. We
contemplate moving our entire Albuquerque operations to the new facility before
the June 30, 2005 expiration of our current Albuquerque lease. The new lease
contains a right of first refusal to purchase the facility, a right of early
termination exercisable on or after July 1, 2012, a right to expand the premises
by 10,000 square feet on or before July 1, 2010, a right to contract within the
premises by 10,000 square feet on or after July 1, 2010, and a right to extend
the term for up to three additional five-year terms. We believe that the new
facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through the term of the lease.


Our general purpose I/O engineering team is located in Newark, California.
The facility, which contains approximately 13,000 square feet and is leased for
a term expiring November 30, 2007, is a one-story, multi-tenant building in a
business park. We believe that this facility will be sufficient to serve our
needs through the term of the lease.


Our Intel and PowerPC CPU sales and engineering functions are located in
Raleigh, North Carolina, where we lease approximately 11,700 square feet of a
one-story multi-tenant facility. The lease expires January 31, 2008, subject to
one option to extend the term of the lease for three additional years. We
believe that this facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through the
term of the lease.


Our St. Paul, Minnesota facility consists of approximately 43,650 square
feet, located in a business park. This facility consists of approximately 18,850
square feet of office space occupied by certain sales, engineering, and support
functions for SBS Commercial, a part of the Americas Group segment, and 24,800
square feet of manufacturing and warehouse space utilized by our U.S.
manufacturing center. The lease expires on January 31, 2006. We believe that
this facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through the term of the
lease.


Our facility, located in Mansfield, Massachusetts is a one-story multi-tenant
building in a business park. The facility consists of approximately 31,200
square feet occupied by sales, engineering and support functions for SBS
Communications, a part of the Americas Group segment. The lease is for a five-
year term expiring on June 14, 2005. We believe that this facility will be
sufficient to serve our needs through the term of the lease.


We lease in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, approximately 19,400 square feet of a
two-story multi-tenant building located within a business park. This location
includes office space, and engineering, assembly and test facilities for the
operations of SBS Canada, a part of the Americas Group segment. The lease term
expires November 30, 2006, subject to one option to extend the term of the lease
for five additional years. We also have a right of first refusal to expand into
any adjacent unoccupied portions of the building during the term of the lease.
We believe that this facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through the
term of the lease.


We lease in Augsburg, Germany, a six-floor building,
consisting of approximately 30,000 square feet of office, test, packaging and
support areas for the operations of KG, a part of the Europe Group. The lease
has a term of ten years expiring December 31, 2005. We are currently negotiating
an extension of the lease to January 31, 2011 to include an addition consisting
of approximately 7,500 square feet, bringing the total area to approximately
37,500 square feet. We believe that the facility, as expanded, will be
sufficient to serve our needs through the term of the lease.



We lease in Mindelheim, Germany approximately 6,200 square feet of a single-
story multi-tenant building located within a business area, consisting of
approximately 1,200 square feet of office space and approximately 5,000 square
feet of manufacturing and warehouse space for the operations of ortec, a part of
the Europe Group. The lease term expires August 31, 2008, subject to one option
to extend the term of the lease for five additional years. We believe this
facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through the term of the lease.


We lease in Shenzhen, China approximately 4,400 square feet of office space
in a multi-story multi-tenancy building located within a high technology
business area that houses certain sales and technical support personnel for the
Americas Group. The lease term expires May 9, 2006, subject to three options to
extend the term of the lease for two additional years each. We believe this
facility will be sufficient to serve our needs through the term of the lease.


In August 2003, we vacated our facility located in a business park in
Carlsbad, California and subsequently subleased the building to an unrelated
third party. This facility consists of approximately 75,200 square feet; 32,000
square feet of office space and 43,200 square feet of warehouse space, and the
lease term for both our lease and the sublease expires in April 2006.



Item 3. Legal Proceedings


We are subject to various claims that arise in the ordinary course of our
business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these
actions will not materially affect our financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity. We are not a party to, and none of our property is
subject to, any material pending legal proceedings. We know of no material
proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities.



Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


Not applicable.


PART II



Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Market price per share


The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market
using the symbol SBSE. Quarterly market prices (as reported on the Nasdaq Stock
Market) for the last two fiscal years were:




2004 2003
-------------------- --------------------
Fiscal quarters High Low High Low
- ----------------------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

First $ 13.93 9.17 $ 12.30 5.00
Second 17.00 9.89 12.00 6.25
Third 17.75 14.30 9.90 7.06
Fourth 19.46 12.72 9.94 6.51




Record Holders


Based on data provided by SBS' transfer agent and The Depository Trust
Company, management believes that as of
August 25, 2004, the number of share
owner accounts of record, as defined by Rule 12g5-1 of the Exchange Act, was
approximately 215, at which date the closing market price of SBS' common stock
was $11.15 per share.


Dividends


SBS has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock. Management's current
policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in SBS' operations and for
expansion of the business. No dividend payments are anticipated in the
foreseeable future (see "Management's Discussion and Analysis: Liquidity and
Financial Condition").


Unregistered Securities


On June 30, 2003, we issued an aggregate of 386,940 shares of
our common stock in connection with the acquisition of 100 percent of the
outstanding common stock of Avvida Holdings Corp. and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Avvida Systems Inc. The offer and sale of these securities were
affected without registration in reliance on the exemption afforded by
Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We filed a registration
statement on Form S-3 to register the 386,940 shares issued on June 30, 2003,
which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 14, 2004.


Equity Compensation Plan Information


The following sets forth certain information as of June 30,
2004 with respect to equity compensation plans of SBS under which securities may
be issued:





 


 


Page


 



PART I


 

 


 

 

 



Forward Looking Statements



1


Item 1.



Business



2


Item 2.



Properties



14


Item 3.



Legal Proceedings



15


Item 4.



Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders



16


 


 

 

 



PART II


 

 


 

 

Item 5.



Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



16


Item 6.



Selected Financial Data



17


Item 7.



Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations



18


Item 7A.



Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk



33


Item 8.



Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



33


Item 9.



Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure



59


Item 9A.



Controls and Procedures



59


Item 9B.



Other Information



60


 


 

 

 



PART III


 

 


 

 

Item 10.



Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant



60


Item 11.



Executive Compensation



60


Item 12.



Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management



60


Item 13.



Certain Relationships and Related Transactions



60


Item 14.



Principal Accounting Fees and Services



60


 


 

 

 



PART IV


 

 


 

 

Item 15.



Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-
K



61







































* Certain equity compensation plans of the Company contain a formula that
automatically increases the number of securities available for issuance by a
percentage of the number of outstanding securities of the Company as
follows:






    • the 1993 Director and Officer Stock Option Plan provides securities
      available for grant equal to 5% of the number of shares of the Company's
      common stock outstanding the first day of each fiscal year plus shares
      underlying expired or terminated options (1,405,824 shares available at June
      30, 2004).
    • the 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan provides securities available
      for grant equal to ten percent of the adjusted average of the outstanding
      stock, as that number is determined by SBS to calculate net income per
      common share - assuming dilution for the preceding fiscal year, reduced by
      any shares of stock under the plan subject to unexercised options and any
      shares of stock under the plan subject to restrictions (452,921 shares
      available at June 30, 2004).


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Not applicable.


 



Item 6. Selected Financial Data


The following selected financial data for the years ended June
30, 2000 through June 30, 2004 have been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of SBS. This information should be read in conjunction with
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report.




Years ended June 30,
----------------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

(Thousands except per share data)
Statements of Operations Data:

Sales............................................... $ 133,874 115,521 118,856 187,180 128,189
Gross profit........................................ 64,729 57,519 42,628 88,565 67,015
Operating income (loss)............................. 7,132 2,165 (38,412) 27,736 15,736
Net income (loss)................................... 5,193 (4,450)(a) (24,360) 17,184 8,903

Per Share Data:
Net income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle............... $ 0.34 0.11 (a) (1.67) 1.23 0.71
Net income (loss)................................. 0.34 (0.30) (1.67) 1.23 0.71

Net income (loss) per common share -
assuming dilution:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle............... $ 0.34 0.11 (a) (1.67) 1.14 0.66
Net income (loss)................................. 0.34 (0.30) (1.67) 1.14 0.66

Balance Sheet Data:

Working capital..................................... $ 86,715 73,187 69,304 75,282 37,535
Total assets........................................ 145,136 128,610 125,648 147,172 133,160
Total liabilities................................... 15,509 12,503 12,002 13,377 34,146
Total stockholders' equity.......................... 129,627 116,107 113,646 133,795 99,014


__________



Notes: We have not declared any dividends during the periods presented and we
do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.


(a) The fiscal year 2003 summary financial data includes a transitional impairment charge
of $6,058,000 (or ($0.41) per common share), net of tax, reported as a cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle as a result of the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," on July 1, 2002.


On August 18, 2000, SBS declared a two- for-one stock split for
stockholders of record on September 5, 2000, distributed on September 20, 2000.
All references to net income per common share, net income per common share -
assuming dilution, common stock, and stockholders' equity have been restated as
if the stock split had occurred as of the earliest period presented.


On June 30, 2003, SBS completed the purchase of Avvida Holdings
and Avvida Systems (subsequently amalgamated under Canadian law into SBS
Canada).


On April 12, 2000, SBS completed the purchase of SDL
Communications, Inc. (subsequently merged into SBS Communications). In
connection with the acquisition, SBS recorded a $4.0 million acquired in-process
research and development ("IPR&D") charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2000.


On December 20, 1999, SBS completed a pooling of interests
transaction with SciTech Inc. ("SciTech"). SciTech was subsequently merged into
SBS Communications. SciTech's historical results did not have a material effect
on combined financial position or results of operations; therefore, the
financial position and results of operations of SBS and SciTech are combined
from October 1, 1999 on a prospective basis.



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations


Company Overview


We design and build open-architecture embedded computer
products that enable OEMs to serve the government, commercial, and
communications end markets. Embedded computer products are put inside or made
part of larger systems to process information, control machines, move computer
data between machines, and interact with people. The companies that use our
products manufacture very sophisticated, expensive devices, for example, MRI
machines, flight simulators, wireless networks, fighter jets and industrial
robots.


The SBS product line is strategically focused on embedded
computing, and we serve virtually all parts of the market. We currently list
more than 450 products in the product section of our website, www.sbs.com. We
offer components like I/O modules, bus adapters, carrier cards, system
enclosures, FPGA boards and single board computers, as well as network switches,
blades and fully integrated systems. Many of these products are available in
ruggedized versions, which can operate in conditions of extreme temperature,
vibration, shock and humidity.


We serve a broad range of customers. We help our customers get
to market faster, more reliably and more economically, by providing a wide range
of standard and customized embedded computer products. Our products have
application in diverse industries, including space and aviation,
telecommunications, military and government, transportation, telemetry,
robotics, networking, broadcasting, wireless communications and medical imaging.


We have grown because we understand our role in the embedded
computing process: we make components which are part of larger, more complicated
devices. As embedded computer applications expand, we broaden our product line
to meet our customers' needs and to attract new customers. We invest in
technology and customer service so that we can grow with our customers.


We have grown organically and through strategic acquisitions,
acquiring companies that supplement our core competencies - a pattern we expect
to continue. Our organic growth is driven by adding new products, improving
existing products through our research and development program, and attracting
new customers with our products and service. We also completed eleven
acquisitions between 1992 and June 2004 that broadened our product offerings and
our customer base.


Executive Summary


During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, we made significant
progress in the implementation of our strategic plan. As a team, we completed a
major restructure of the Company and developed an outward looking, aggressive
approach to the market. As an example, we expanded into China with the opening
and staffing of a sales and technical support office in June 2004.


For the past two years, we have maintained an annual book-to-
bill ratio of greater than one-to-one. Throughout fiscal 2004, our customers
required shorter lead times for our products, increasing our turn business and
resulting in more extensive variability of our bookings. In addition, we believe
the number and quality of design win opportunities in all of our markets are
strong, and we remain committed to providing an excellent base of products.


During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (fiscal 2004), we
noted the following:




  • Our book-to-bill ratio for fiscal 2004 was 1.04 to 1.



Book-to-bill ratio represents the net value of customer orders
received and booked each period divided by total sales.




  • Order backlog was $42.1 million as of June 30, 2004, compared to $36.2
    million as of June 30, 2003;



Order backlog represents customer orders that have been
contracted for future delivery. Accordingly, these orders have not yet been
recognized as revenue, but represent potential future revenue.




  • Thirty-four design wins were achieved during fiscal 2004.



Each reported design win represents an initial purchase order
of a minimum of $100,000 and is forecasted to produce a minimum of $500,000 in
sales annually when in production.


By end market, the design wins included twenty in the
government market, seven in the commercial market, and seven in the
communications market.




  • During fiscal 2004, one commercial customer represented approximately
    10% of our total sales and one communications customer represented
    approximately 8% of our total sales. We had no other customer whose sales
    represented more than 5% of our total in fiscal 2004.


Financial Highlights


Select financial highlights during the year ended June 30, 2004
compared to the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 follows:





Fiscal Years Ended
---------------------------------------------------
June 30, June 30,
Thousands (except -------------------- % --------- %
per share amounts) 2004 2003 change 2002 change
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Sales............................ $ 133,874 $ 115,521 15.9% $ 118,856 12.6%
========= ========= =========

Operating income (loss).......... $ 7,132 $ 2,165 229.4% $ (38,412) 118.6%
========= ========= =========

Income (loss) before
cumulative effect of change
in accounting.................. $ 5,193 $ 1,608 222.9% $ (24,360) 121.3%
========= ========= =========

Net income (loss)(*)............. $ 5,193 $ (4,450) 216.7% $ (24,360) 121.3%
========= ========= =========

Income (loss) per share
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting........... $ 0.34 $ 0.11 209.1% $ (1.67) 120.4%
========= ========= =========

Net income (loss) per
share - assuming
dilution (**).................. $ 0.34 $ (0.30) 213.3% $ (1.67) 120.4%
========= ========= =========


Sales for fiscal 2004 were $133.9 million, a 15.9% increase from sales of
$115.5 million for the prior year.


Operating income for fiscal 2004 increased approximately $5.0 million, or
229.4% from the fiscal 2003 balance.


Net income for fiscal 2004 was $5.2 million, compared with income before the
cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill of $2.4 million and net
loss of $(4.4) million for the prior fiscal year.



* Included in the determination of net loss in fiscal year 2003 is a
transitional goodwill impairment charge of
$6.1 million (or ($0.41) per
common share), net of tax, which is reported as a cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, as a result of our adoption of SFAS 142 effective on July
1, 2002.


Net income per share - assuming dilution for fiscal 2004 was $0.34, compared
with income per common share - assuming dilution before the cumulative effect of
change in accounting for goodwill of $0.11 and net loss per common share -
assuming dilution of $(0.30) for the prior fiscal year.



** Included in the results for fiscal 2004 are employee severance and
consolidation costs associated with the closure of the Carlsbad, California
facility of approximately $2.4 million, which negatively impacted net income per
common share - assuming dilution by ($0.11) on an after tax basis. This compares
to employee severance and consolidation costs associated with closure of the
Carlsbad facility and other management actions totaling approximately $1.7
million for fiscal 2003, which negatively impacted income per common share -
assuming dilution before the cumulative effect of change in accounting for
goodwill by ($0.08) on an after tax basis.


For a more complete analysis of the financial results, see
"Results of Operations" below.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


The preparation of consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. We use estimates when we account for items such as
inventory, allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable, depreciation and
amortization periods for property and equipment and certain identifiable
intangible assets, goodwill and intangible asset impairment analysis, and income
taxes (see Note 1 to the SBS' consolidated financial statements). These
estimates and assumptions are based upon our continuous evaluation of historical
results and anticipated future events. Actual results could differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.


The Securities and Exchange Commission defines critical
accounting polices as those that are, in management's view, most important to
the portrayal of SBS' financial condition and results of operations and those
that require significant judgments and estimates. We believe the following
critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates
used in preparing our consolidated financial statements:





  • Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue from product sales upon
    shipment to customers, provided we have received a valid purchase order, the
    price is fixed, title has transferred, collection of the associated
    receivable is reasonably assured, and there are no remaining significant
    obligations. Where customer acceptance provisions exist, we defer revenue
    recognition until acceptance by the customer unless we demonstrate the
    product meets the customer specified criteria upon shipment provided all
    other revenue recognition criteria were met.



  • Inventory Valuation. We record inventory write- downs based on
    estimates of obsolete or unmarketable inventory, taking into account
    historical usage, forecasted future demand, and general market conditions.
    Write-downs may also be recorded based on our decision to discontinue the
    marketing of certain products or product lines. If our forecasts are
    incorrect, market conditions deteriorate, or we decide to exit other product
    lines, further inventory write-downs may be required which result in an
    increase to cost of sales and reduced gross profit. If market conditions or
    demand are better than expected, we may sell inventories that have been
    previously written down, resulting in reduced or zero cost of sales and
    improved gross profit.



  • Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts. We maintain allowances
    for uncollectible accounts receivable resulting from the failure of our
    customers to make required payments. Our estimate is based on, among other
    things, the aging of accounts receivable, historical write-off experience,
    and the current and projected financial condition of our customers. If we
    misinterpret the financial condition of our customers or if the financial
    condition of customers deteriorates, additional allowances for uncollectible
    accounts may be required, which would increase operating costs and reduce
    operating profit.



  • Goodwill. In conjunction with the implementation of SFAS 142 as of
    the beginning of fiscal year 2003, we no longer amortize goodwill, but
    instead test for impairment at least annually. The first step of the
    goodwill impairment test is a comparison of the fair value of a reporting
    unit to its carrying value. The fair value of a reporting unit is the amount
    which the unit as a whole could be bought or sold in a current transaction
    between willing parties. The goodwill impairment test requires us to
    identify our reporting units and obtain estimates of the fair values of
    those units as of the testing date. We estimate the fair values of our
    reporting units using discounted cash flow and public company market
    multiple valuation models. Those models require estimates of future
    revenues, profits, capital expenditures and working capital for each
    reporting unit. We estimate these amounts by evaluating historical trends,
    current budgets, operating plans and industry data. A decline in the fair
    value of any of our reporting units below its carrying value is an indicator
    that the underlying goodwill of the unit is potentially impaired. If that
    occurs, we are required to complete the second step of the goodwill
    impairment test to determine whether the unit's goodwill is impaired. The
    second step of the goodwill impairment test is a comparison of the implied
    fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill to its carrying value. An
    impairment loss is required for the amount which the carrying value of a
    reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. If an impairment
    loss is recognized, the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill
    becomes the new cost basis of the unit's goodwill.




We conduct our annual goodwill impairment test as of April 1 of
each fiscal year when our budgets and operating plans for the forthcoming year
are finalized. The timing and frequency of our goodwill impairment tests are
based on an ongoing assessment of events and circumstances that would more than
likely reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. We
will continue to monitor our goodwill balance for impairment and conduct formal
tests when impairment indicators are present.





  • Long-Lived and Intangible Assets. We evaluate the carrying value of
    long-lived and intangible assets whenever certain events or changes in
    circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
    These events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, a prolonged
    industry or economic downturn, a significant decline in SBS' market value,
    or significant reductions in projected future cash flows. An asset is
    considered to be impaired if future undiscounted cash flows, without
    consideration of interest, are insufficient to recover the carrying amount
    of the asset. Once an asset is deemed impaired, a charge to expense is
    recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds fair
    value. Fair value is generally determined by calculating the discounted
    future cash flows using a discount rate based upon our weighted average cost
    of capital. Estimates of future cash flows require significant judgment, and
    any change in these estimates may result in additional impairment charges
    and reduced operating profits.



  • Income Taxes. Our estimate of current and deferred income taxes
    reflects our assessment of current and future taxes to be paid or received
    on items reflected in the financial statements, giving consideration to the
    recoverability of certain of the deferred tax assets, which arise from
    temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of
    revenue and expense. Estimates of current income taxes include benefits for
    items such as general business and other credits, U.S. sales to foreign
    jurisdictions, and utilization of foreign tax credits. Actual income taxes
    may vary from our estimates due to future changes in tax laws or because of
    a review of our tax returns by taxing authorities, which may result in an
    increase or decrease to income tax expense. We must also assess the
    likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. If
    recovery is determined not to be more likely than not, we must increase our
    provision for taxes by recording a reserve, in the form of a valuation
    allowance, for the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately
    be recoverable. As of June 30, 2004, excluding certain operating losses and
    tax credits for U.S. State income purposes, we believe our recorded deferred
    tax assets will ultimately be recovered. However, should there be a change
    in our ability to recover the deferred tax assets, our tax provision would
    increase in the period we determine that recovery is no longer more likely
    than not.



Recent Acquisitions


We made no acquisitions during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2004. SBS completed the acquisitions described below during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2003. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method
of accounting, and the results of operations of the acquired companies have been
combined with SBS' since the date of the acquisition. The purchase price has
been allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
on their estimated fair values with goodwill, if any, representing the excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired.


On June 30, 2003, SBS acquired 100 percent of the outstanding
common stock of Avvida Holdings Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Avvida
Systems Inc. (Avvida), located in Waterloo, Canada. Avvida provides image
processing solutions to customers serving a wide variety of applications.
Avvida's focus is emerging programmable logic, including fully programmable
gateway array (FPGA) technology utilized in high performance video, image and
data processing solutions. We plan to incorporate FPGA technology into existing
and future products across all SBS product lines.


The aggregate purchase price of $6.2 million, including
acquisition costs of $0.6 million, was paid in cash and shares of SBS common
stock valued at $3,574,020. The value of the 386,940 shares of SBS common stock
was determined based on the average market price of SBS' common shares over the
two-day period before and after the terms of the acquisition were agreed to and
announced. In conjunction with the purchase price allocation, the estimated fair
value of identifiable intangible assets, specifically a core technology asset
valued at $970,000 and a covenant not-to-compete valued at $1.2 million, was
based on an assessment of their fair value determined by management, and
goodwill of approximately $3.5 million was recorded which is not deductible for
tax purposes. During the year ended June 30, 2004, we received an income tax
refund that exceeded the amount recorded at acquisition by $104,000 which was
recorded as a reduction to goodwill. The identifiable intangible assets will be
amortized over a period of 5 years based on the estimated economic useful life
of the core technology asset and the contractual period of the covenant.


 Results of Operations


The


 


 


 


Plan Category



Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based
awards



Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards



Number of securities remaining available for future
issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected
in first column)


Equity compensation plans approved by security holders


 


2,952,505


 


$14.91


 


2,794,638 *


Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders


 


-


 


-


 


-




Total


 


2,952,505


 


$14.91


 


2,794,638 *