MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SELECT LP - 10-K Annual Report

Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the year ended December 31, 2004 or

[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the transition period from ________________ to ___________________

Commission File Number 0-19511

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SELECT L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Limited Partnership Agreement)

DELAWARE 13-3619290
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

Demeter Management Corporation
330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10017
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant?s telephone number, including area code (212) 905-2700

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered

None None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No _____

Indicate by check-mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No X

State the aggregate market value of the Units of Limited Partnership Interest
held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The aggregate market value shall be
computed by reference to the price at which Units were sold as of the last
business day of the registrant?s most recently completed second fiscal quarter:
$491,242,441 at June 30, 2004.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(See Page 1)

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SELECT L.P.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
DECEMBER 31, 2004

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference
as follows:

Documents Incorporated Part of Form 10-K

Partnership?s Prospectus dated
April 28, 2004 I

Partnership's Supplement to the
Prospectus dated October 19, 2004 I

Annual Report to Morgan Stanley
Spectrum Series Limited Partners
for the year ended December 31,
2004 II, III, and IV

PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS

(a) General Development of Business. Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Select L.P. (the "Partnership") is a Delaware limited partnership
organized in 1991 to engage primarily in the speculative trading
of futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and forward
contracts on physical commodities, and other commodity interests,
including, but not limited to, foreign currencies, financial
instruments, metals, energy, and agricultural products. The
Partnership commenced trading operations on August 1, 1991. The
Partnership is one of the Morgan Stanley Spectrum series of funds,
comprised of the Partnership, Morgan Stanley Spectrum Currency
L.P., Morgan Stanley Spectrum Global Balanced L.P., Morgan Stanley
Spectrum Strategic L.P., and Morgan Stanley Spectrum Technical
L.P. (collectively, the ?Spectrum Series?).

The Partnership?s general partner is Demeter Management
Corporation (?Demeter?). The non-clearing commodity broker is
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (?Morgan Stanley DW?). The clearing
commodity brokers are Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (?MS &
Co.?) and Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited (?MSIL?).
Demeter, Morgan Stanley DW, MS & Co., and MSIL are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. The trading advisors to the
Partnership are EMC Capital Management, Inc., Northfield Trading

L.P., Rabar Market Research, Inc., Sunrise Capital
Management, Inc., and effective January 1, 2004 Graham Capital
Management, L.P. (individually, a ?Trading Advisor?, or
collectively, the ?Trading Advisors?).

Units of limited partnership interest (?Unit(s)?) are sold at
monthly closings at a purchase price equal to 100% of the net
asset value per Unit as of the close of business on the last day
of each month.

The managing underwriter for the Partnership is Morgan Stanley
DW.

The Partnership's net asset value per Unit at December 31, 2004
was $28.88, representing a decrease of 4.7 percent from the net
asset value per Unit of $30.31 at December 31, 2003. For a more
detailed description of the Partnership's business, see
subparagraph (c).

(b) Financial Information about Segments. For financial infor-
mation reporting purposes, the Partnership is deemed to engage in
one industry segment, the speculative trading of futures,
forwards, and options on such contracts. The relevant financial
information is presented in Items 6 and 8.

(c) Narrative Description of Business. The Partnership is
in the business of speculative trading of futures, forwards, and
options pursuant to trading instructions provided by the Trading
Advisors.
For a detailed description of the different facets of the
Partnership's business, see those portions of the Partnership's
prospectus, dated April 28, 2004 (the ?Prospectus?), and the
Partnership's supplement to the Prospectus dated October 19, 2004
(the "Supplement"), incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K,
set forth below.

Facets of Business
1. Summary 1. "Summary" (Pages 1-9 of the
Prospectus and Pages S-1 ?
S-2 of the Supplement).

2. Futures, Options, and 2. "The Futures, Options, and
Forwards Markets Forwards Markets" (Pages
140-144 of the Prospectus).

3. Partnership?s Trading 3. ?Use of Proceeds? (Pages 26-28
Arrangements and of the Prospectus and Page
Policies S-6 of the Supplement), ?The
Trading Advisors? (Pages 68-
118 of the Prospectus and
Pages S-31 ? S-41 of the
Supplement).

4. Management of the Part- 4. ?The Trading Advisors ? The
nership Management Agreements? (Page
68 of the Prospectus), ?The
General Partner? (Pages 63-
67 of the Prospectus and
Pages S-28 ? S-30 of the
Supplement), ?The Commodity
Brokers? (Pages 121-122 of
the Prospectus and Page S-41
of the Supplement) and ?The
Limited Partnership Agree-
ments? (Pages 123-127 of
the Prospectus).

5. Taxation of the Partner- 5. ?Material Federal Income Tax
ship?s Limited Partners Considerations? and ?State
and Local Income Tax
Aspects? (Pages 133-139 of
the Prospectus).

(d) Financial Information about Geographic Areas. The Partnership
has not engaged in any operations in foreign countries; however,
the Partnership (through the commodity brokers) enters into
forward contract transactions where foreign banks are the
contracting party and trades futures, forwards, and options on
foreign exchanges.
(e) Available Information. The Partnership files annual reports
on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on
Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (?SEC?). You may read and copy any
document filed by the Partnership at the SEC?s Public Reference
Room at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on

the Public Reference Room. The Partnership does not
maintain an internet website, however, the SEC maintains a website
that contains annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy
statements, and other information that issuers (including the
Partnership) file electronically with the SEC. The SEC?s website
address is http://www.sec.gov.

Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership?s executive and administrative offices are located
within the offices of Morgan Stanley DW. The Morgan Stanley DW
offices utilized by the Partnership are located at 330 Madison
Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

Demeter changed its address in August 2004 from 825 Third Avenue,
9th Floor, New York, NY 10022 to 330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor,
New York, NY 10017.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.

PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S PARTNERSHIP UNITS AND RELATED
SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS

(a) Market Information. There is no established public trading
market for Units of the Partnership.

(b) Holders. The number of holders of Units at December 31, 2004
was approximately 52,488.

(c) Distributions. No distributions have been made by the
Partnership since it commenced trading operations on August 1,
1991. Demeter has sole discretion to decide what distributions, if
any, shall be made to investors in the Partnership. Demeter
currently does not intend to make any distributions of
Partnership?s profits.

(d) Securities Sold; Consideration. Units are continuously sold
at monthly closings at a purchase price equal to 100% of the net
asset value per Unit as of the close of business on the last day
of each month.

The aggregate price of the Units sold through December 31, 2004
was $763,455,784.

(e) Underwriter. The managing underwriter for the
Partnership is Morgan Stanley DW.

(f) Use of Proceeds.

Since no expenses are chargeable against proceeds, 100% of
the proceeds of the offering have been applied to the working
capital of the Partnership for use in accordance with the ?Use of
Proceeds? section of the Prospectus and the Supplement included as
part of the above referenced Registration Statements.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (in dollars)

Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity. The Partnership deposits its assets with Morgan
Stanley DW as non-clearing broker, and MS & Co. and MSIL as
clearing brokers in separate futures, forwards, and options
trading accounts established for each Trading Advisor. Such
assets are used as margin to engage in trading and may be used as
margin solely for the Partnership?s trading. The assets are held
in either non-interest bearing bank accounts or in securities and
instruments permitted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
for investment of customer segregated or secured funds. Since the
Partnership?s sole purpose is to trade in futures, forwards, and
options, it is expected that the Partnership will continue to own
such liquid assets for margin purposes.

The Partnership?s investment in futures, forwards, and options
may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges
limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations
referred to as ?daily price fluctuations limits? or ?daily
limits?. Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily
limit. If the price for a particular futures or options contract
has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit,
positions in that futures or options contract can neither be taken
nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or

within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved
the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no
trading. These market conditions could prevent the Partnership
from promptly liquidating its futures or options contracts and
result in restrictions on redemptions.

There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading forward
contracts on foreign currencies. The markets for some world
currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may
prevent the Partnership from trading in potentially profitable
markets or prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating
unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to
substantial losses. Either of these market conditions could
result in restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered by
this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the
Partnership?s assets.

There are no known material trends, demands, commitments, events,
or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely to
result in the Partnership?s liquidity increasing or decreasing in
any material way.

Capital Resources. The Partnership does not have, nor expects to
have, any capital assets. Redemptions, exchanges, and sales of
Units in the future will affect the amount of funds available for

investments in futures, forwards, and options in subsequent
periods. It is not possible to estimate the amount, and therefore
the impact, of future inflows and outflows of Units.

There are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that
would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the
Partnership?s capital resource arrangements at the present time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations. The
Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor
does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to
make future payments that would affect its liquidity or capital
resources.

Results of Operations
General. The Partnership's results depend on the Trading Advisors
and the ability of each Trading Advisor?s trading program(s) to
take advantage of price movements in the futures, forwards, and
options markets. The following presents a summary of the
Partnership's operations for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004, and a general discussion of its trading
activities during each period. It is important to note, however,
that the Trading Advisors trade in various markets at different
times and that prior activity in a particular market does not mean
that such market will be actively traded by the Trading Advisors

or will be profitable in the future. Consequently, the
results of operations of the Partnership are difficult to discuss
other than in the context of the Trading Advisors' trading
activities on behalf of the Partnership during the period in
question. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The Partnership?s results of operations set forth in the financial
statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, which require
the use of certain accounting policies that affect the amounts
reported in these financial statements, including the following:
The contracts the Partnership trades are accounted for on a trade-
date basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The difference
between their cost and market value is recorded on the Statements
of Operations as ?Net change in unrealized trading profit (loss)?
for open (unrealized) contracts, and recorded as ?Realized trading
profit (loss)? when open positions are closed out. The sum of
these amounts, along with the ?Proceeds from Litigation
Settlement?, constitutes the Partnership?s trading results. The
market value of a futures contract is the settlement price on the
exchange on which that futures contract is traded on a particular
day. The value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on
the spot rate as of the close of business. Interest income, as
well as management fees, incentive fees, and brokerage fees
expenses of the Partnership are recorded on an accrual basis.

Demeter believes that, based on the nature of the
operations of the Partnership, no assumptions relating to the
application of critical accounting policies other than those
presently used could reasonably affect reported amounts.

The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
totaling $33,923,907 and expenses totaling $57,235,807, resulting
in a net loss of $23,311,900 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit decreased from $30.31
at December 31, 2003 to $28.88 at December 31, 2004. Total
redemptions and subscriptions for the year were $43,132,131
and $210,227,672, respectively, and the Partnership?s ending
capital was $585,306,125 at December 31, 2004, an increase of
$143,783,641 from ending capital at December 31, 2003 of
$441,522,484.

The most significant trading gains of approximately 4.7% were
recorded in the energy markets, primarily during February, May,
throughout the third quarter, and in October, from long futures
positions in crude oil and its related products as prices advanced
upwards amid concerns for market supply, falling inventory levels,
and heavy market demand. Additional Partnership gains of
approximately 1.7% achieved in the agricultural markets, primarily
during the first quarter, resulted from long futures positions in
corn, soybeans, and soybean-related products as prices for these

commodities finished higher amid strong, steady demand from
Asia. In the metals markets, gains of approximately 1.5% were
recorded primarily during the first quarter from long futures
positions in base metals as prices moved higher in response to
increased demand from China coupled with a weaker U.S. dollar.
Long futures positions in industrial metals held during October
were also profitable due to the drop in the U.S. dollar prompted
by the investment community?s perception that the Bush
administration would not take steps to stem the U.S. dollar?s
decline. Relatively smaller Partnership gains of approximately
0.8% resulted from trading in the currency markets, primarily
during October and November. Long positions in the euro and Swiss
franc versus the U.S. dollar benefited from a declining U.S.
dollar trend triggered by prospects for lower U.S. interest rates,
higher oil prices, concern for the growing U.S. Current-Account
deficit, and beliefs that the Bush administration would not act to
curb the decline in the U.S. dollar. A portion of the
Partnership?s overall gains for the year was offset by losses of
approximately 2.5% incurred in the global interest rate sector,
particularly during the second and third quarter, from positions
in U.S. and Australian interest rate futures. During January, long
positions in U.S. interest rate futures experienced losses as
prices declined following comments from the U.S. Federal Reserve
concerning a shift in the U.S. Federal Reserve?s interest rate
policy. Short positions in Australian interest rate futures
deepened sector losses as prices reversed higher during the final

week of January. During April, long U.S. interest rate
futures positions incurred losses as prices tumbled following the
release of stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs data. During May,
short positions in global bond futures experienced losses as
prices moved higher during the latter half of the month due to
uncertainty in global equity prices, weaker-than-expected economic
data, stronger energy prices, and geopolitical concerns. During
June, short positions experienced losses as prices rallied on
weaker-than-expected economic reports and expectations that the
U.S. Federal Reserve would not aggressively tighten U.S. interest
rates. During July, short positions in U.S. interest rate futures
recorded losses as prices moved higher after the release of
disappointing U.S. unemployment data. Additional losses were
incurred from newly established long U.S. interest rate futures
positions after prices moved lower following Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan?s upbeat assessment of the U.S. economy.
During September, long positions in U.S. interest rate futures
resulted in losses as prices declined due to expectations for
rising interest rates prompted by the release of positive U.S.
economic data. Smaller Partnership losses of approximately 0.4%
resulted from trading in the global stock index sector, primarily
during the second and third quarter, via positions in Asian equity
index futures. During the second quarter, long positions in these
markets incurred losses as global equity prices were

negatively impacted by geopolitical concerns and expanding
energy prices. Newly established short Asian equity index
positions experienced losses as prices rebounded during the second
quarter amid a slight pullback in oil prices and strong earnings
from technology companies. During the third quarter, long Asian
equity index positions experienced losses as prices reversed lower
due to the release of disappointing U.S. employment data, surging
energy prices, and new warnings concerning potential terrorist
attacks.

The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
totaling $74,213,042 and expenses totaling $40,026,137, resulting
in net income of $34,186,905 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit increased from $27.65
at December 31, 2002 to $30.31 at December 31, 2003. Total
redemptions and subscriptions for the year were $30,542,924 and
$142,500,704, respectively, and the Partnership?s ending capital
was $441,522,484 at December 31, 2003, an increase of $146,144,685
from ending capital at December 31, 2002 of $295,377,799.

The most significant trading gains of approximately 12.2% were
recorded in the currency markets during January from long
positions in the euro versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the
European currency strengthened against the U.S. dollar amid
renewed fears of a military conflict with Iraq, increased
tensions with North Korea, and weak U.S. economic data.
During May, gains were supplied by long positions in the euro
versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the euro strengthened amid
uncertainty regarding the Bush administration?s economic policy,
renewed fears of potential terrorist attacks against U.S.
interests, and investor preference for non-U.S. dollar assets.
Additional currency gains were recorded by long positions in the
Australian dollar versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the
Australian currency strengthened in response to continued
weakness in the U.S. currency, rising gold prices, and relatively
high interest rates in Australia. During November and December,
long positions in the euro, British pound, and Australian and New
Zealand dollar versus the U.S. dollar generated additional gains.
The U.S. dollar tumbled to a six-year low against the Australian
and New Zealand dollar and a five-year low against the British
pound. Additionally, the euro soared past the $1.20 mark, its
highest level against the U.S. dollar since its introduction in
January 1999. The U.S. dollar?s weakness was caused by a variety
of factors, including concerns regarding the growing U.S. current
trade account and budget deficits, the Federal Reserve?s policy
of maintaining low interest rates, widening interest rate
differentials relative to other countries, and renewed fears of
global terrorism. In the metals markets, gains of approximately
5.9% were achieved primarily during the fourth quarter by long
futures positions in copper and nickel. Industrial metals prices
rallied during October in response to increased demand,

especially from China, as well as to growing investor
sentiment that the global economy was on the path to recovery.
During December, copper and nickel prices rose to six and
fourteen-year highs, respectively, benefiting from increased
demand from China and the strengthening of the global economy.
Gains of approximately 2.6% in the global stock index markets
were supplied by long positions in Asian stock index futures
during August as Asian equity prices drew strength from robust
Japanese economic data and rising prices in the U.S. equity
markets. Long U.S. equity index futures positions profited after
the release of favorable economic data during October, as well as
in December. In the agricultural markets, gains of approximately
1.7% resulted from long futures positions in soybeans and its
related products during September as prices reacted positively in
response to robust U.S. export sales data and smaller U.S. crop
assessments. Then in October, long futures positions in cotton
and soybeans generated gains as increased demand from China and
tight market supplies lifted prices. A portion of the
Partnership?s overall gains for the year was offset by losses of
approximately 1.1% in the global interest rate markets incurred
primarily during the last four months of the year. The
Partnership experienced losses from short European futures
positions. Prices reversed higher amid investor demand for
?safe-haven? investments following renewed volatility in global
equity markets, continued geopolitical instability in the Middle
East, and comments from the U.S. Federal Reserve regarding the
continuation of low U.S. interest rates. In the energy
sector, losses of approximately 0.8% partially offset
Partnership?s gains for the year. Long positions in crude oil
futures resulted in losses during March as prices reversed
sharply lower amid market anticipation of a swift military
victory for Coalition forces against Iraq. During September,
losses were suffered from short positions in crude oil futures as
prices unexpectedly reversed higher following OPEC?s announcement
for output reductions and curbs in production. During October,
short crude oil positions experienced further losses as prices
moved higher in response to supply fears spurred by Middle East
tensions early in the month, as well as strike threats in
Nigeria, one of the world?s major oil producers.

The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
totaling $67,605,728 and expenses totaling $26,782,529, resulting
in net income of $40,823,199 for the year ended December 31,
2002. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit increased from
$23.96 at December 31, 2001 to $27.65 at December 31, 2002.
Total redemptions and subscriptions for the year were $49,669,825
and $62,812,840, respectively, and the Partnership?s ending
capital was $295,377,799 at December 31, 2002, an increase of
$53,966,214 from ending capital at December 31, 2001 of
$241,411,585.

The most significant trading gains of approximately 12.1%
were recorded in the currency markets from long positions in the
euro and Swiss franc versus the U.S. dollar during May, June, and
December, as the U.S. dollar?s value weakened amid investors?
fears concerning global political tensions, specifically the
threat of war between India and Pakistan, the looming threat of a
military strike against Iraq, and the resumption of North Korea?s
nuclear program. Additional gains of approximately 9.5% were
recorded from June through September, as well as in December,
from long positions in European and U.S. interest rate futures as
prices trended higher amid a shift of assets from stocks into
bonds as investors sought the ?safe-haven? of fixed income
investments. In the agricultural futures markets, gains of
approximately 1.2% were recorded from long positions in soybean
and wheat futures as prices rallied during the second and third
quarter amid fears that hot and dry weather would adversely
affect crops in the U.S. Midwest. In the energy futures markets,
gains of approximately 1.0% were experienced from long positions
in natural gas futures during March, August, September, and
December, as prices moved higher amid supply concerns. A portion
of the Partnership?s overall gains was offset by losses of
approximately 1.8% recorded in the metals markets early in the
year from long positions in copper futures as prices fell amid
weak industrial demand. Additional losses were recorded in
October from short positions in copper futures as prices reversed

higher in response to a temporary rally in global equity
prices in October.

For an analysis of unrealized gains and (losses) by contract type
and a further description of 2004 trading results, refer to the
Partnership?s Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year ended
December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
13.01 of this Form 10-K.

The Partnership's gains and losses are allocated among its
partners for income tax purposes.

Market Risk.
Financial Instruments. The Partnership is a party to financial
instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit
risk. The Partnership trades futures contracts, options on
futures contracts, and forward contracts on physical commodities
and other commodity interests, including, but not limited to,
foreign currencies, financial instruments, metals, energy, and
agricultural products. In entering into these contracts, the
Partnership is subject to the market risk that such contracts may
be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as
interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less
valuable. If the markets should move against all of the positions
held by the Partnership at the same time, and if the Trading

Advisors were unable to offset positions of the
Partnership, the Partnership could lose all of its assets and the
limited partners would realize a 100% loss.

In addition to the Trading Advisors? internal controls, the
Trading Advisors must comply with the Partnership?s trading
policies that include standards for liquidity and leverage that
must be maintained. The Trading Advisors and Demeter monitor the
Partnership's trading activities to ensure compliance with the
trading policies and Demeter can require the Trading Advisors to
modify positions of the Partnership if Demeter believes they
violate the Partnership's trading policies.

Credit Risk.
In addition to market risk, in entering into futures, forward, and
options contracts there is a credit risk to the Partnership that
the counterparty on a contract will not be able to meet its
obligations to the Partnership. The ultimate counterparty or
guarantor of the Partnership for futures, forward, and options
contracts traded in the United States and most foreign exchanges
on which the Partnership trades is the clearinghouse associated
with such exchange. In general, a clearinghouse is backed by the
membership of the exchange and will act in the event of non-
performance by one of its members or one of its member?s
customers, which should significantly reduce this credit risk.

There is no assurance that a clearinghouse, exchange, or
other exchange member will meet its obligations to the
Partnership, and Demeter and the commodity brokers will not
indemnify the Partnership against a default by such parties.
Further, the law is unclear as to whether a commodity broker has
any obligation to protect its customers from loss in the event of
an exchange or clearinghouse defaulting on trades effected for the
broker?s customers. In cases where the Partnership trades off-
exchange forward contracts with a counterparty, the sole recourse
of the Partnership will be the forward contract?s counterparty.

Demeter deals with these credit risks of the Partnership in
several ways. First, it monitors the Partnership?s credit
exposure to each exchange on a daily basis. The commodity
brokers inform the Partnership, as with all their customers, of
its net margin requirements for all its existing open positions
and Demeter has installed a system which permits it to monitor
the Partnership?s potential net credit exposure, exchange by
exchange, by adding the unrealized trading gains on each
exchange, if any, to the Partnership?s margin liability thereon.

Second, the Partnership?s trading policies limit the amount of its
net assets that can be committed at any given time to futures
contracts and require a minimum amount of diversification in the
Partnership?s trading, usually over several different products and

exchanges. Historically, the Partnership?s exposure to any
one exchange has typically amounted to only a small percentage of
its total net assets and on those relatively few occasions where
the Partnership?s credit exposure climbs above such level,
Demeter deals with the situation on a case by case basis,
carefully weighing whether the increased level of credit exposure
remains appropriate. Material changes to the trading policies may
be made only with the prior written approval of the limited
partners owning more than 50% of Units then outstanding.

Third, with respect to forward contract trading, the Partnership
trades with only those counterparties which Demeter, together with
Morgan Stanley DW, have determined to be creditworthy. The
Partnership presently deals with MS & Co. as the sole counterparty
on forward contracts.

For additional information, see the ?Financial Instruments?
section under ?Notes to Financial Statements? in the
Partnership?s Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year
ended December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 13.01 of this Form 10-K.

Inflation has not been a major factor in the Partnership?s
operations.

Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK

Introduction
The Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the
speculative trading of futures, forwards, and options. The
market-sensitive instruments held by the Partnership are acquired
for speculative trading purposes only and, as a result, all or
substantially all of the Partnership?s assets are at risk of
trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market-
sensitive instruments is inherent to the primary business
activity of the Partnership.

The futures, forwards, and options traded by the Partnership
involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is
often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of
interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial
instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent
changes in the fair value of the Partnership?s open positions, and
consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and
cash flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded
futures, forwards, and options are settled daily through variation
margin. Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency
contracts are settled upon termination of the contract, however,
the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to
the net unrealized loss on open contracts in the Partnership
accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily
maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held
at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS & Co.

The Partnership?s total market risk may increase or decrease as
it is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including, but not
limited to, the diversification among the Partnership?s open
positions, the volatility present within the markets, and the
liquidity of the markets.

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the
Partnership is typically many times the applicable margin
requirements. Margin requirements generally range between 2% and
15% of contract face value. Additionally, the use of leverage
causes the face value of the market sector instruments held by the
Partnership to typically be many times the total capitalization of
the Partnership.

The Partnership?s past performance is no guarantee of its future
results. Any attempt to numerically quantify the Partnership?s
market risk is limited by the uncertainty of its speculative
trading. The Partnership?s speculative trading and use of
leverage may cause future losses and volatility (i.e., ?risk of
ruin?) that far exceed the Partnership?s experiences to date under

the ?Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market
Sectors? section and significantly exceed the Value at Risk
(?VaR?) tables disclosed.

Limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the
current net asset value of their investment.

Quantifying the Partnership?s Trading Value at Risk
The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partner-
ship?s market risk exposures contain ?forward-looking statements?
within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability
provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed
to be forward-looking statement for purposes of the safe harbor,
except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of mark
to market accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of
the Partnership?s open positions is directly reflected in the
Partnership?s earnings and cash flow.

The Partnership?s risk exposure in the market sectors traded by
the Trading Advisors is estimated below in terms of VaR. The

Partnership estimates VaR using a model based upon
historical simulation (with a confidence level of 99%) which
involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes
in the value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into
account linear exposures to risks including equity and commodity
prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and correlation
among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value
are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market
indices or other market factors (?market risk factors?) to which
the portfolio is sensitive. The one-day 99% confidence level of
the Partnership?s VaR corresponds to the negative change in
portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factors, would
have been exceeded once in 100 trading days, or one day in 100.
VaR typically does not represent the worst case outcome. Demeter
uses approximately four years of daily market data (1,000
observations) and revalues its portfolio (using delta-gamma
approximations) for each of the historical market moves that
occurred over this time period. This generates a probability
distribution of daily ?simulated profit and loss? outcomes. The
VaR is the appropriate percentile of this distribution. For
example, the 99% one-day VaR would represent the 10th worst
outcome from Demeter?s simulated profit and loss series.

The Partnership?s VaR computations are based on the risk
representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or

contract and do not distinguish between exchange and non-
exchange dealer-based instruments. They are also not based on
exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements.

VaR models, including the Partnership?s, are continuously evolving
as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques
and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model
is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting
purposes only and is not utilized by either Demeter or the Trading
Advisors in their daily risk management activities. Please
further note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures used by other entities.

The Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors
The following table indicates the VaR associated with the
Partnership?s open positions as a percentage of total net assets
by primary market risk category at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership?s total
capitalization was approximately $585 million and $442 million,
respectively.

Primary Market December 31, 2004 December 31, 2003
Risk Category Value at Risk Value at Risk

Equity (2.63)% (1.75)%

Currency (1.94) (1.19)

Interest Rate (1.57) (0.48)

Commodity (0.58) (1.40)

Aggregate Value at Risk (3.56)% (2.64)%

The VaR for a market category represents the one-day downside risk
for the aggregate exposures associated with this market category.
The Aggregate Value at Risk listed above represents the VaR of the
Partnership?s open positions across all the market categories, and
is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market categories
due to the diversification benefit across asset classes.

Because the business of the Partnership is the speculative
trading of futures, forwards, and options, the composition of its
trading portfolio can change significantly over any given time
period, or even within a single trading day, which could
positively or negatively materially impact market risk as
measured by VaR.

The table below supplements the December 31, 2004 VaR set forth
above by presenting the Partnership?s high, low, and average VaR,
as a percentage of total net assets for the four quarter-end
reporting periods from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.

Primary Market Risk Category High Low Average
Equity (2.63)% (0.66)% (1.25)%
Currency (1.94) (0.37) (0.84)
Interest Rate (2.90) (0.64) (1.81)
Commodity (1.32) (0.39) (0.86)
Aggregate Value at Risk (3.56)% (1.44)% (2.64)%

Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk
VaR models permit estimation of a portfolio?s aggregate market
risk exposure, incorporating a range of varied market risks;
reflect risk reduction due to portfolio diversification or hedging
activities; and can cover a wide range of portfolio assets.
However, VaR risk measures should be viewed in light of the
methodology?s limitations, which include, but may not be limited
to the following:
* past changes in market risk factors will not always result in
accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of
future market movements;
* changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may
differ from those of the VaR model;

* VaR results reflect past market fluctuations applied to
current trading positions while future risk depends on future
positions;
* VaR using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the
market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged
within one day; and
* the historical market risk factor data used for VaR estimation
may provide only limited insight into losses that could be
incurred under certain unusual market movements.

In addition, the VaR tables above, as well as the past
performance of the Partnership, give no indication of the
Partnership?s potential ?risk of ruin?.

The VaR tables provided present the results of the Partnership?s
VaR for each of the Partnership?s market risk exposures and on an
aggregate basis at December 31, 2003, and for the four quarter-
end reporting periods during calendar year 2004. VaR is not
necessarily representative of the Partnership?s historic risk,
nor should it be used to predict the Partnership?s future
financial performance or its ability to manage or monitor risk.
There can be no assurance that the Partnership?s actual losses on
a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated above
or that such losses will not occur more than once in 100 trading
days.

Non-Trading Risk

The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash
balances. These balances and any market risk they may represent
are immaterial.

The Partnership also maintains a substantial portion
(approximately 83% as of December 31, 2004) of its available
assets in cash at Morgan Stanley DW. A decline in short-term
interest rates would result in a decline in the Partnership?s
cash management income. This cash flow risk is not considered to
be material.

Materiality, as used throughout this section, is based on an
assessment of reasonably possible market movements and any
associated potential losses, taking into account the leverage,
optionality, and multiplier features of the Partnership?s market-
sensitive instruments, in relation to the Partnership?s net
assets.
Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures
The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership?s
market risk exposures ? except for (A) those disclosures that are
statements of historical fact and (B) the descriptions of how the
Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures ? constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of

the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act. The Partnership?s primary market risk exposures, as
well as the strategies used and to be used by Demeter and the
Trading Advisors for managing such exposures, are subject to
numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which
could cause the actual results of the Partnership?s risk controls
to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies.
Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid
markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political
upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of
new market participants, increased regulation, and many other
factors could result in material losses, as well as in material
changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies
of the Partnership. Investors must be prepared to lose all or
substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the
Partnership at December 31, 2004, by market sector. It may be
anticipated, however, that these market exposures will vary
materially over time.

Equity. The primary market exposure of the Partnership at
December 31, 2004 was to equity price risk in the G-7 countries.

The G-7 countries consist of France, the U.S., Britain,
Germany, Japan, Italy, and Canada. The stock index futures
traded by the Partnership are by law limited to futures on
broadly-based indices. At December 31, 2004, the Partnership?s
primary exposures were to the DAX (Germany), S&P 500 (U.S.),
NIKKEI (Japan), and Hang Seng (China) stock indices. The
Partnership is exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or
static markets in the European, U.S., Japanese, Australian, and
Chinese stock indices. Static markets would not cause major
market changes, but would make it difficult for the Partnership
to avoid trendless price movements, resulting in numerous small
losses.

Currency. The second largest market exposure of the Partnership
at December 31, 2004 was to the currency sector. The
Partnership?s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations,
primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing
relationships between different currencies and currency pairs.
Interest rate changes, as well as political and general economic
conditions influence these fluctuations. The Partnership trades
a large number of currencies, including cross-rates ? i.e.,
positions between two currencies other than the U.S. dollar. At
December 31, 2004, the Partnership?s major exposures were to the
euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Swiss franc, Norwegian kroner,
and Australian dollar currency crosses, as well as to outright

U.S. dollar positions. Outright positions consist of the
U.S. dollar vs. other currencies. These other currencies include
major and minor currencies. Demeter does not anticipate that the
risk associated with the Partnership?s currency trades will
change significantly in the future.

Interest Rate. The third largest market exposure of the
Partnership at December 31, 2004 was to the global interest rate
sector. Exposure was primarily spread across the European, U.S.,
Japanese, Australian, and Canadian interest rate sectors.
Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the
sovereign bond futures positions held by the Partnership and
indirectly affect the value of its stock index and currency
positions. Interest rate movements in one country, as well as
relative interest rate movements between countries, materially
impact the Partnership?s profitability. The Partnership?s
interest rate exposure is generally to interest rate fluctuations
in the U.S. and the other G-7 countries. However, the
Partnership also takes futures positions in the government debt
of smaller nations - e.g., Australia. Demeter anticipates that
G-7 countries and Australian interest rates will remain the
primary interest rate exposure of the Partnership for the
foreseeable future. The speculative futures positions held by
the Partnership may range from short to long-term instruments.

Consequently, changes in short, medium, or long-term
interest rates may have an effect on the Partnership.

Commodity.
Metals. At December 31, 2004, the Partnership had market
exposure in the metals sector. The Partnership's metals
exposure at December 31, 2004 was to fluctuations in the
price of base metals, such as aluminum, copper, zinc, and
lead, and precious metals, such as gold and silver.
Economic forces, supply and demand inequalities,
geopolitical factors, and market expectations influence
price movements in these markets. The Trading Advisors
utilize the trading system(s) to take positions when market
opportunities develop, and Demeter anticipates that the
Partnership will continue to do so.

Soft Commodities and Agriculturals. At December 31, 2004,
the Partnership had market exposure to the markets that
comprise these sectors. Most of the exposure was to the
coffee, corn, cotton, and soybeans markets. Supply and
demand inequalities, severe weather disruptions, and market
expectations affect price movements in these markets.

Energy. At December 31, 2004, the Partnership had
market exposure in the energy sector. The Partnership?s
energy exposure was primarily to futures contracts in crude
oil and its related products, and natural gas. Price
movements in these markets result from geopolitical
developments, particularly in the Middle East, as well as
weather patterns and other economic fundamentals.
Significant profits and
losses, which have been experienced in the past, are
expected to continue to be experienced in the future.
Natural gas has exhibited volatility in prices resulting
from weather patterns and supply and demand factors and will
likely continue in this choppy pattern.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure
The following was the only non-trading risk exposure of the
Partnership at December 31, 2004:

Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership?s primary
foreign currency balances at December 31, 2004 were in
euros, Hong Kong dollars, Japanese yen, Australian dollars,
and British pounds. The Partnership controls the non-
trading risk of foreign currency balances by regularly
converting them back into U.S. dollars upon liquidation of
their respective positions.

Qualitative Disclosure Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure
The Partnership and the Trading Advisors, separately, attempt to
manage the risk of the Partnership?s open positions in
essentially the same manner in all market categories traded.
Demeter attempts to manage market exposure by diversifying the
Partnership?s assets among different Trading Advisors in a multi-
advisor Partnership, each of whose strategies focus on different
market sectors and trading approaches, and by monitoring the
performance of the Trading Advisors daily. In addition, the
Trading Advisors establish diversification guidelines, often set
in terms of the maximum margin to be committed to positions in
any one market sector or market-sensitive instrument.

Demeter monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership?s non-
trading instrument, cash. Cash is the only Partnership
investment directed by Demeter, rather than the Trading Advisors.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Financial Statements are incorporated by reference to the
Partnership's Annual Report, which is filed as Exhibit 13.01
hereto.

Supplementary data specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K:

Summary of Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

Quarter Total Trading Results Net Net Income/
Ended including interest Income/(Loss) (Loss) Per Unit

2004
March 31 $ 61,318,726 $ 43,063,158 $ 2.88
June 30 (89,312,298) (102,519,477) (6.05)
September 30 (17,696,888) (30,110,417) (1.63)
December 31 79,614,367 66,254,836 3.37

Total $ 33,923,907 $ (23,311,900) $ (1.43)

2003
March 31 $ 5,648,636 $ (3,435,893) $ (0.22)
June 30 30,802,630 21,952,801 1.89
September 30 (7,076,850) (16,582,417) (1.29)
December 31 44,838,626 32,252,414 2.28

Total $ 74,213,042 $ 34,186,905 $ 2.66

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) As of the end of the period covered by this annual report,
the President and Chief Financial Officer of Demeter, the
general partner of the Partnership, have evaluated the
effectiveness of the Partnership?s disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Exchange Act), and have judged such controls and
procedures to be effective.

(b) There have been no material changes during the period covered
by this annual report in the Partnership?s internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect these
controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Management?s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Demeter is responsible for the management of the Partnership.

Management of Demeter (?Management?) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. The internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The Partnership?s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:

* Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

* Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded
as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that the Partnership?s transactions are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of Management and directors;
and

* Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
the Partnership?s assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership?s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2004. In making this assessment, Management used the criteria
set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on our assessment and those criteria, Management believes
that the Partnership maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Partnership?s independent registered
public accounting firm, has issued an audit report on Management?s
assessment of the Partnership?s internal control over financial
reporting and on the effectiveness of the Partnership?s internal
control over financial reporting. This report, which expresses
unqualified opinions on Management?s assessment and on the
effectiveness of the Partnership?s internal control over financial
reporting, appears under ?Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm? in the Partnership?s Annual Report to Limited
Partners for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
The Board of Directors of Demeter, the general partner of the
registrant, approved the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP as the
registrant?s principal accountant for tax purposes. Ernst & Young
LLP was engaged by the registrant on November 1, 2004. Deloitte &

Touche LLP will continue as the registrant?s principal
accountant and audit the financial statements of the registrant.

There have been no material disagreements with Deloitte & Touche
LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

There are no directors or executive officers of the Partnership.
The Partnership is managed by Demeter.

Directors and Officers of the General Partner
The directors and executive officers of Demeter are as follows:

Mr. Jeffrey D. Hahn resigned his position as Chief Financial
Officer and Director of Demeter.

Mr. Jeffrey S. Swartz resigned his position as a Director of
Demeter.

Mr. Jeffrey A. Rothman, age 43, is the Chairman of the Board of
Directors and President of Demeter. Mr. Rothman is the Managing
Director of Morgan Stanley Managed Futures, responsible for
overseeing all aspects of the firm?s managed futures department.
Mr. Rothman has been with the managed futures department for
eighteen years. Throughout his career, Mr. Rothman has helped
with the development, marketing, and administration of
approximately 40 commodity pools. Mr. Rothman is an active member
of the Managed Funds Association and has recently served on its

Board of Directors. Mr. Rothman has a B.A. degree in
Liberal Arts from Brooklyn College, New York.

Mr. Richard A. Beech, age 53, is a Director of Demeter. Mr. Beech
has been associated with the futures industry for over 25 years.
He has been at Morgan Stanley DW since August 1984 where he is
presently an Executive Director and head of Futures, Forex &
Metals. Mr. Beech began his career at the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange, where he became the Chief Agricultural Economist doing
market analysis, marketing, and compliance. Prior to joining
Morgan Stanley DW, Mr. Beech worked at two investment banking
firms in operations, research, managed futures, and sales
management. Mr. Beech has a B.S. degree in Business
Administration from Ohio State University and an M.B.A. degree
from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Mr. Raymond A. Harris, age 48, is a Director of Demeter. Mr.
Harris is currently Managing Director and head of Client Solutions
for Morgan Stanley Individual Investor Group (?IIG?), a Board
Member of Morgan Stanley DW Inc., and Director of Morgan Stanley
Trust. Mr. Harris joined Morgan Stanley in 1982 and served in
financial and operational assignments for Dean Witter Reynolds.
In 1994, he joined the Discover Financial Services division,
leading restructuring and product development efforts. Mr. Harris
became Chief Administrative Officer for Morgan Stanley Investment

Management in 1999. In 2001, he was named head of Global
Products and Services for Investment Management. Mr. Harris has
an M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Chicago and a B.A.
degree from Boston College.

Mr. Frank Zafran, age 50, is a Director of Demeter. Mr. Zafran is
an Executive Director of Morgan Stanley and, in September 2002,
was named Chief Administrative Officer of Morgan Stanley?s Client
Solutions Division. Mr. Zafran joined the firm in 1979 and has
held various positions in Corporate Accounting and the Insurance
Department, including Senior Operations Officer ? Insurance
Division, until his appointment in 2000 as Director of 401(k) Plan
Services, responsible for all aspects of 401(k) Plan Services
including marketing, sales, and operations. Mr. Zafran received a
B.S. degree in Accounting from Brooklyn College, New York.

Mr. Douglas J. Ketterer, age 39, is a Director of Demeter. Mr.
Ketterer is a Managing Director and has had responsibility for
managing a number of departments at Morgan Stanley over the years,
most recently as head of the Investment Solutions Group, which is
comprised of a number of departments which offer products and
services through Morgan Stanley?s IIG (including Managed Futures,
Alternative Investments, Insurance Services, Personal Trust,

Corporate Services, and others). Mr. Ketterer joined the
firm in 1990 in the Corporate Finance Division as a part of the
Retail Products Group. He later moved to the origination side of
Investment Banking, and then, after the merger between Morgan
Stanley and Dean Witter, served in the Product Development Group
at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Advisors (now known as Morgan
Stanley Funds). From the summer of 2000 to the summer of 2002, Mr.
Ketterer served as the Chief Administrative Officer for Morgan
Stanley Investment Management, where he headed the Strategic
Planning & Administrative Group. Mr. Ketterer received his M.B.A.
from New York University?s Leonard N. Stern School of Business and
his B.S. in Finance from the University at Albany?s School of
Business.

Mr. Todd Taylor, age 42, is a Director of Demeter. Mr. Taylor
began his career with Morgan Stanley in June 1987 as a Financial
Advisor in the Dallas office. In 1995, he joined the Management
Training Program in New York and was appointed Branch Manager of
the Missouri and southern Illinois branch offices in 1997. Three
years later, in 2000, Mr. Taylor was appointed to a newly created
position, Director of IIG Learning and Development, before
becoming the Director of IIG Strategy in 2002. Most recently, Mr.
Taylor has taken on a new role as the High Net Worth Segment

Director. Mr. Taylor graduated from Texas Tech University
with a B.B.A. in Finance.

Mr. William D. Seugling, age 35, is a Director of Demeter. Mr.
Seugling is a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley and currently
serves as Director of Client Solutions for U.S. Private Wealth
Management. Mr. Seugling joined Morgan Stanley in June 1993 as an
Associate in Equity Structured Products having previously worked
in research and consulting for Greenwich Associates from October
1991 to June 1993. Since 1994, he has focused broadly on
analysis and solutions for wealthy individuals and families
culminating in his current role within the division. He was
named Vice President in 1996 and an Executive Director in 1999.
Mr. Seugling graduated cum laude from Bucknell University with a
B.S. in Management and a concentration in Chemistry.

Ms. Louise M. Wasso-Jonikas, age 51, is a Director of Demeter.
Ms. Wasso-Jonikas is a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley and
the Director of Alternative Investments for the IIG of Morgan
Stanley. Ms. Wasso-Jonikas was Co-Founder, President, and Chief
Operating Officer of Graystone Partners, an objective consulting
firm, from 1993 to 1999, when Graystone was acquired by Morgan
Stanley. Prior to founding Graystone, Ms. Wasso-Jonikas was a

Senior Vice President at Bessemer Trust and opened their
Chicago office. She also was a Vice President at the Northern
Trust in their Wealth Management Services Group where she worked
exclusively with their largest private clients and family offices
throughout the U.S. and abroad, serving their broad investment
and custody needs. Ms. Wasso-Jonikas also worked as an equity
block trader with Goldman Sachs and with Morgan Stanley advising
and managing money for private clients. Ms. Wasso-Jonikas? focus
is on developing a robust external manager platform utilizing
alternative managers for Morgan Stanley?s IIG private clients as
well as overseeing some of the Morgan Stanley?s largest client
relationships. Ms. Wasso-Jonikas holds a B.A. in Economics from
Mount Holyoke College and an M.B.A in Finance from the University
of Chicago Graduate School of Business.

Mr. Kevin Perry, age 35, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Demeter. Mr. Perry currently serves as an Executive Director and
Controller within the IIG at Morgan Stanley. Mr. Perry joined
Morgan Stanley in October 2000 and is also Chief Financial
Officer of Morgan Stanley Trust National Association, Van Kampen
Funds Inc., and Morgan Stanley Distribution, Inc. Prior to

joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Perry worked as an auditor and
consultant in the financial services practice of Ernst & Young
LLP from October 1991 to October 2000. Mr. Perry received a B.S.
degree in Accounting from the University of Notre Dame in 1991
and is a Certified Public Accountant.

All of the foregoing directors have indefinite terms.

The Audit Committee
The Partnership is operated by its general partner, Demeter, and
does not have an audit committee. The entire Board of Directors
of Demeter serves as the audit committee. None of the directors
are considered to be ?independent? as that term is used in Item
7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. The Board of Directors of Demeter has
determined that Mr. Kevin Perry is the audit committee financial
expert.

Code of Ethics
The Partnership has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to
the Partnership?s principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions. The Partnership is operated by its
general partner, Demeter. The President, Chief Financial Officer,
and each member of the Board of Directors of Demeter are employees

of Morgan Stanley and are subject to the code of ethics
adopted by Morgan Stanley, the text of which can be viewed on
Morgan Stanley?s website at
http://www.morganstanley.com/ourcommitment/ codeofconduct.html.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership has no directors and executive officers. As a
limited partnership, the business of the Partnership is managed by
Demeter, which is responsible for the administration of the
business affairs of the Partnership but receives no compensation
for such services.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT

(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners - At December
31, 2004, there were no persons known to be beneficial owners of
more than 5 percent of the Units.

(b) Security Ownership of Management - At December 31, 2004,
Demeter owned 212,951.775 Units of general partnership interest,
representing a 1.05 percent interest in the Partnership.

(c) Changes in Control ? None.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Refer to Note 2 - "Related Party Transactions" of "Notes to
Financial Statements", in the accompanying Annual Report to
Limited Partners for the year ended December 31, 2004, which is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.01 of this Form 10-K. In
its capacity as the Partnership's retail commodity broker, Morgan
Stanley DW received commodity brokerage fees (paid and accrued by
the Partnership) of $36,680,599 for the year ended December 31,
2004.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Morgan Stanley DW, on behalf of the Partnership, pays all
accounting fees. The Partnership reimburses Morgan Stanley DW
through the brokerage fees it pays, as discussed in the Notes to
Financial Statements in the Annual Report to the Limited Partners
for the year ended December 31, 2004.

(1) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees for professional services
rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with their audit
of the Partnership?s financial statements and reviews of the
financial statements included in the Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, and in connection with statutory and regulatory filings for
the year ended December 31, 2004 were approximately $52,750 and
for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $48,757.

(2) Audit-Related Fees. There were no fees for assurance
and related services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

(3) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees for tax compliance services
rendered by Ernst & Young LLP were approximately $30,446 and
Deloitte & Touche LLP were $29,559, respectively, for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

(4) All Other Fees. None.

As of the date of this Report, the Board of Directors of Demeter
has not adopted pre-approval policies and procedures. As a
result, all services provided by Ernst & Young LLP and Deloitte &
Touche LLP must be directly pre-approved by the Board of Directors
of Demeter. Additionally, all services provided by Deloitte &
Touche LLP are borne by Morgan Stanley through the brokerage fees
paid by the Partnership. Such services must be directly pre-
approved by Morgan Stanley?s Audit Director and Principal
Accounting Officer. All services provided by Ernst & Young LLP
must be communicated to Morgan Stanley?s Audit Director.

PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Listing of Financial Statements
The following financial statements and report of independent
registered public accounting firm, all appearing in the
accompanying Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year ended
December 31, 2004 are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13.01
of this Form 10-K:
? Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003,
and 2002.

? Statements of Financial Condition, including the Schedules of
Investments, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.

? Statements of Operations, Changes in Partners? Capital, and
Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and
2002.

- - Notes to Financial Statements.

With the exception of the aforementioned information and the
information incorporated in Items 7, 8, and 13, the Annual Report
to Limited Partners for the year ended December 31, 2004 is not
deemed to be filed with this report.

2. Listing of Financial Statement Schedules
No financial statement schedules are required to be filed with
this report.

(c) Exhibits
Refer to Exhibit Index on Page E-1 to E-4.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SELECT L.P.
(Registrant)

BY: Demeter Management Corporation,
General Partner

March 31, 2005 BY: /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman
Jeffrey A. Rothman,
President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Demeter Management Corporation.

BY: /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman March 31, 2005
Jeffrey A. Rothman, President

/s/ Richard A. Beech March 31, 2005
Richard A. Beech, Director

/s/ Raymond A. Harris March 31, 2005
Raymond A. Harris, Director

/s/ Frank Zafran March 31, 2005
Frank Zafran, Director

/s/ Douglas J. Ketterer March 31, 2005
Douglas J. Ketterer, Director

/s/ Todd Taylor March 31, 2005
Todd Taylor, Director

/s/ William D. Seugling March 31, 2005
William D. Seugling, Director

/s/ Louise M. Wasso-Jonikas March 31, 2005
Louise M. Wasso-Jonikas, Director

/s/ Kevin Perry March 31, 2005
Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX
ITEM
3.01 Form of Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement
of the Partnership, is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A of the Partnership?s Prospectus, dated April 28,
2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of
1933 on May 4, 2004.
3.02 Certificate of Limited Partnership, dated March 19, 1991,
is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.02 of the
Partnership?s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-47829) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 12, 1998.
3.03 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Limited
Partnership, dated April 6, 1999, (changing its name from
Dean Witter Spectrum Select L.P.), is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.03 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-68773)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
12, 1999.
3.04 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Limited
Partnership, dated November 1, 2001 (changing its name
from Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Spectrum Select L.P.), is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the
Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-19511) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2001.
10.01 Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of
June 1, 1998, among the Partnership, Demeter, and Rabar
Market Research, Inc. is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.01 of the Partnership's Form 10-K (File No.
0-19511) for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30,
1999.
10.02 Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of
June 1, 1998, among the Partnership, Demeter, and EMC
Capital Management, Inc. is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 of the Partnership's Form 10-K (File No. 0-
19511) for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 1999.

10.03 Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of
June 1, 1998, among the Partnership, Demeter, and Sunrise
Capital Management, Inc. is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.03 of the Partnership's Form 10-K (File No.
0-19511) for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30,
1999.
10.04 Management Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001, among the
Partnership, Demeter, and Northfield Trading L.P., is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of the
Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-19511) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2001.
10.07 Form of Subscription and Exchange Agreement and Power of
Attorney to be executed by purchasers of Units is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the
Partnership?s Prospectus, dated April 28, 2004, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of 1933 on May 4, 2004.
10.10 Amended and Restated Escrow Agreement, among the
Partnership, Morgan Stanley Spectrum Strategic L.P.,
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Global Balanced L.P., Morgan
Stanley Spectrum Technical L.P., Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P., Morgan Stanley Spectrum Commodity L.P.,
Morgan Stanley DW, and The Chase Manhattan Bank as escrow
agent, dated March 10, 2000, is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 of the Partnership's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-90467) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2001.
10.11 Form of Subscription Agreement Update Form to be executed
by purchasers of Units is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit C of the Partnership?s Prospectus, dated April 28,
2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of
1933 on May 4, 2004.
10.12 Amended and Restated Customer Agreement between the
Partnership and Morgan Stanley DW, dated as of October 16,
2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of the
Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-19511) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2001.

10.13 Commodity Futures Customer Agreement between MS & Co. and
the Partnership, and acknowledged and agreed to by Morgan
Stanley DW, dated as of June 6, 2000, is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.02 of the Partnership?s Form 8-K
(File No. 0-19511) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 1, 2001.
10.14 Customer Agreement between the Partnership and MSIL, dated
as of June 6, 2000, is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.04 of the Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No.
0-19511) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 1, 2001.
10.15 Foreign Exchange and Options Master Agreement between MS &
Co. and the Partnership, dated as of April 30, 2000, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.05 of the
Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-19511) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2001.
10.16 Securities Account Control Agreement among the
Partnership, MS & Co., and Morgan Stanley DW, dated as of
May 1, 2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03
of the Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-19511) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1,
2001.
13.01 December 31, 2004 Annual Report to Limited Partners is
filed herewith.
31.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
32.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.

Morgan Stanley
Spectrum Series

December 31, 2004
Annual Report

[LOGO] Morgan Stanley

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SERIES

HISTORICAL FUND PERFORMANCE

Presented below is the percentage change in Net Asset Value per Unit from the
start of every calendar year each Fund has traded. Also provided is the
inception-to-date return and the compound annualized return since inception for
each Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

INCEPTION-
TO-DATE
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 RETURN
FUND % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spectrum Currency. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11.7 11.1 12.2 12.4 (8.0) 44.1
(6 mos.)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spectrum Global
Balanced......... -- -- -- (1.7) 22.8 (3.6) 18.2 16.4 0.8 0.9 (0.3) (10.1) 6.2 (5.6) 46.1
(2 mos.)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spectrum Select... 31.2 (14.4) 41.6 (5.1) 23.6 5.3 6.2 14.2 (7.6) 7.1 1.7 15.4 9.6 (4.7) 188.8
(5 mos.)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spectrum Strategic -- -- -- 0.1 10.5 (3.5) 0.4 7.8 37.2 (33.1) (0.6) 9.4 24.0 1.7 45.6
(2 mos.)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spectrum Technical -- -- -- (2.2) 17.6 18.3 7.5 10.2 (7.5) 7.8 (7.2) 23.3 23.0 4.4 136.3
(2 mos.)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPOUND
ANNUALIZED
RETURN
FUND %
- -----------------------------

Spectrum Currency. 8.5

- -----------------------------
Spectrum Global
Balanced......... 3.8

- -----------------------------
Spectrum Select... 8.2

- -----------------------------
Spectrum Strategic 3.8

- -----------------------------
Spectrum Technical 8.8

- -----------------------------

DEMETER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10017
(212) 905-2700

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SERIES
ANNUAL REPORT
2004

Dear Limited Partner:

This marks the fifth annual report for Morgan Stanley Spectrum Currency L.P.,
the eleventh annual report for Morgan Stanley Spectrum Global Balanced L.P.,
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Strategic L.P., and Morgan Stanley Spectrum Technical
L.P., and the fourteenth annual report for Morgan Stanley Spectrum Select L.P.
The Net Asset Value per Unit for each of the five Morgan Stanley Spectrum Funds
("Fund(s)") as of December 31, 2004 was as follows:

% CHANGE
FUNDS N.A.V. FOR YEAR
----------------------------------------

Spectrum Currency $14.41 -8.0%
----------------------------------------
Spectrum Global Balanced $14.61 -5.6%
----------------------------------------
Spectrum Select $28.88 -4.7%
----------------------------------------
Spectrum Strategic $14.56 1.7%
----------------------------------------
Spectrum Technical $23.63 4.4%
----------------------------------------

Since its inception in July 2000, Spectrum Currency has increased by 44.1% (a
compound annualized return of 8.5%). Since their inception in November 1994,
Spectrum Global Balanced has increased by 46.1% (a compound annualized return
of 3.8%), Spectrum Strategic has increased by 45.6% (a compound annualized
return of 3.8%), and Spectrum Technical has increased by 136.3% (a compound
annualized return of 8.8%). Since its inception in August 1991, Spectrum Select
has increased by 188.8% (a compound annualized return of 8.2%).

Detailed performance information for each Fund is located in the body of the
financial report. For each Fund, we provide a trading results by sector chart
that portrays trading gains and trading losses for the year in each sector in
which the Fund participates. In the case of Spectrum Currency, we provide the
trading gains and trading losses

for the five major currencies in which the Fund participates, and composite
information for all other "minor" currencies traded within the Fund.

The trading results by sector charts indicate the year's composite percentage
returns generated by the specific assets dedicated to trading within each
market sector in which each Fund participates. Please note that there is not an
equal amount of assets in each market sector, and the specific allocations of
assets by a Fund to each sector will vary over time within a predetermined
range. Below each chart is a description of the factors that influenced trading
gains and trading losses within each Fund during the year.

Should you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to
contact Demeter Management Corporation, 330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor, New
York, NY 10017 or your Morgan Stanley Financial Advisor.

I hereby affirm, that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information
contained in this report is accurate and complete. Past performance is no
guarantee of future results.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman
Jeffrey A. Rothman
Chairman of the Board of Directors and President
Demeter Management Corporation
General Partner for
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Currency L.P.
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Global Balanced L.P.
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Select L.P.
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Strategic L.P.
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Technical L.P.

SPECTRUM CURRENCY

[CHART]

Year ended December 31, 2004
----------------------------
Australian dollar 0.08
British pound -4.12
Euro 6.98
Japanese yen -8.81
Swiss franc 2.72
Minor currencies 2.30

Note: Reflects trading results only and does not include fees or interest
income. Minor currencies may include, but are not limited to, the South
African rand, Thai baht, Greek drachma, Singapore dollar, Mexican peso,
New Zealand dollar, Polish zloty, Brazilian real, and Norwegian krona.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING GAINS:
.. Partnership gains were achieved from long positions in the euro, Swiss
franc, and Polish zloty versus the U.S. dollar, primarily during the fourth
quarter. The U.S. dollar's value trended lower throughout the quarter amid
rising oil prices, reports of weaker-than-expected U.S. economic data, a
growing U.S. Current-Account deficit, and the investment community's
perception that the Bush administration would not move to intervene in the
U.S. dollar's decline.

.. Additional gains resulted from long positions in the New Zealand dollar and
Brazilian real versus the U.S. dollar as both foreign currencies benefited
from a weaker U.S. dollar during the fourth quarter. Additionally, the New
Zealand dollar's value moved higher as it was propelled by stronger gold
prices.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING LOSSES:
.. The most significant losses were recorded from positions in the Japanese yen
versus the U.S. dollar. Short yen positions against the U.S. dollar recorded
losses during March, as the yen reversed higher due to speculation that the
Bank of Japan was relaxing its efforts to weaken the yen. After reversing to
long yen positions, the U.S. dollar surged upwards against most currencies
during April following the release of stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs data,
thereby causing additional losses. The yen also came under pressure from
weakening efforts undertaken by the Japanese government. Short yen positions
incurred losses during May as the U.S. dollar's value declined amid fears of
potential terrorist attacks, expanding energy prices, and the

SPECTRUM CURRENCY

release of weaker-than-expected U.S. economic data. During June, short yen
positions experienced further losses due to the yen's rise prompted by
better-than-anticipated improvements in Japanese economic data. The yen
continued its rise later in the month in response to speculation that the
Bank of Japan would move to raise interest rates amid further confirmation
that Japan's economic recovery was on track. During August and September,
short yen positions also experienced losses as the U.S. dollar's value
declined under pressure from concerns for the rate of U.S. economic growth,
soft economic data, and record-high oil prices. Finally, long yen positions
incurred losses during December as the yen's value declined early in the
month due to weak Japanese machinery orders and temporary U.S. dollar
strength.

.. Additional losses resulted from positions in the British pound, primarily
during the fourth quarter. During both October and November, short pound
positions generated losses as the pound's value reversed higher amid a
decline in the U.S. dollar prompted by higher oil prices and concerns for
the growing U.S. Current-Account deficit. During December, long pound
positions recorded losses as the pound's value declined due to
weaker-than-expected U.K. economic data and the releases of dovish minutes
from the Bank of England's December meeting, which reflected the possibility
for future interest rate cuts.

.. Losses were also experienced from short positions in the Mexican peso versus
the U.S. dollar, primarily during the first quarter, as the peso reversed
higher in response to encouraging signs of a recovery in the Mexican economy.

.. Positions in the South African rand versus the U.S. dollar also incurred
losses during the first nine months of the year. During January and
February, long rand positions declined amid expectations for weaker gold
prices caused by improvements in the global economy. During April, long
South African rand positions versus the U.S. dollar experienced losses as
the U.S. dollar's value moved higher amid economic optimism. During May,
short South African rand positions incurred losses as the commodity-linked
currency reversed higher in response to rising gold prices. During July, the
U.S. dollar's upward reversal was prompted by upbeat market sentiment.
During August, long rand positions experienced further losses as the rand's
value moved lower due to a reduction in interest rates by the South African
Reserve Bank.

.. Long positions in the Norwegian krona versus the U.S. dollar incurred
smaller losses, primarily during the second and third quarter, as the value
of the U.S. dollar temporarily moved higher in response to growing
confidence in the U.S. economy.

SPECTRUM GLOBAL BALANCED

[CHART]

Year ended December 31, 2004
----------------------------
Currencies -1.96
Interest Rates 0.51
Stock Indices 1.92
Energies 0.61
Metals -1.44
Agriculturals -1.30

Note: Reflects trading results only and does not include fees or interest
income.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING LOSSES:
.. Losses were recorded in the currency markets during the first nine months of
the year. During the first quarter, long cross-rate positions in the Swiss
franc versus the Japanese yen resulted in losses as the yen's value reversed
higher due to speculation that the Bank of Japan was relaxing its efforts to
weaken the yen. Long positions in the U.S. dollar index were also
unprofitable as the U.S. dollar's value declined due to a reduction in Bank
of Japan intervention activity. During the second quarter, losses were
incurred from long positions in the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar as
the U.S. dollar surged following the release of stronger-than-expected U.S.
jobs data. The yen also came under pressure from weakening efforts by
Japanese government currency market interventions. Losses were also incurred
from short U.S. dollar positions against the South African rand as the U.S.
dollar benefited from rising U.S. interest rates and the perception that the
U.S. economy was experiencing a sustainable recovery. During the third
quarter, short cross-rate positions in the Australian dollar versus the
Japanese yen incurred losses as the Australian currency reversed higher amid
speculation for increases in Australian interest rates. During August,
losses were experienced from short positions in the Japanese yen versus the
U.S. dollar, Swiss franc, Australian dollar, and the euro as the value of
the yen moved higher due to higher Japanese equity prices and the release of
positive Japanese economic data. During September, short positions in the
Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar resulted in losses as the U.S. dollar
reversed lower amid perceptions that the U.S. Federal Reserve reformed their
outlook regarding aggressive increases in interest rates. Long positions in
the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar also resulted in losses during
September as the yen declined due to

SPECTRUM GLOBAL BALANCED

Japan's swelling national debt and a reversal of the U.S. dollar's value in
response to a hike in U.S. interest rates.

.. Additional losses were established in the metals markets from positions in
base metals. Long futures positions in nickel experienced losses as prices
fell due to a strengthening of the U.S. dollar during January. Short nickel
futures positions during May experienced losses as prices increased due to
weakness in the U.S. dollar and strong Asian demand. During the third
quarter, further sector losses resulted from long nickel futures positions
after prices declined amid a slowdown in demand from China. Newly
established long futures positions created further losses during the fourth
quarter as prices weakened amid concern for demand and an advancing U.S.
dollar.

.. In the agricultural markets, losses were incurred from positions in soybean
oil, sugar, and cocoa. Short futures positions in soybean oil generated
losses after prices reversed higher amid news of reduced supply, strong
Chinese export demand, and rumors that U.S. soybean crops were possibly
infected by a damaging fungus. Long futures positions in sugar incurred
losses during August, October, and November as prices for the commodity
moved lower in response to technically-based selling and news of weaker
demand. Losses were also experienced from positions in cocoa as a result of
"whipsawing" in prices due to supply and demand concerns throughout most of
the year.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING GAINS:
.. Gains were achieved in the global stock index markets, primarily during
November and December from long positions in European and U.S. stock index
futures as prices advanced in response to a decline in oil prices, positive
consumer sentiment, and an increase in corporate earnings.

.. Partnership gains were achieved in the energy markets, primarily during the
third quarter, from long futures positions in crude oil and its related
products as prices trended higher amid heavy market demand and supply
concerns.

.. Gains achieved in the global interest rates markets resulted during the
first and third quarter of the year from long positions in U.S. and European
interest rate futures. During the first quarter, long positions benefited
from a rally in bond prices sparked by low inflation and reduced concerns
for increases in interest rates. Long positions also profited during the
third quarter as prices trended higher in response to a surge in oil prices,
a drop in equity prices, and a conflicted economic picture generated by U.S.
economic reports.

SPECTRUM SELECT

[CHART]

Year ended December 31, 2004
----------------------------
Currencies 0.76
Interest Rates -2.51
Stock Indices -0.45
Energies 4.74
Metals 1.54
Agriculturals 1.67

Note: Reflects trading results only and does not include fees or interest
income.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING GAINS:
.. Gains were recorded in the energy markets, primarily during February, May,
throughout the third quarter, and in October, from long futures positions in
crude oil and its related products as prices advanced upwards amid concerns
for market supply, falling inventory levels, and heavy market demand.

.. Additional Partnership gains achieved in the agricultural markets, primarily
during the first quarter, resulted from long futures positions in corn,
soybeans, and soybean-related products as prices for these commodities
finished higher amid strong, steady demand from Asia.

.. In the metals markets, gains were recorded primarily during the first
quarter from long futures positions in base metals as prices moved higher in
response to increased demand from China coupled with a weaker U.S. dollar.
Long futures positions in industrial metals held during October were also
profitable due to the drop in the U.S. dollar prompted by the investment
community's perception that the Bush administration would not take steps to
stem the U.S. dollar's decline.

.. Relatively smaller Partnership gains resulted from trading in the currency
markets, primarily during October and November. Long positions in the euro
and Swiss franc versus the U.S. dollar benefited from a declining U.S.
dollar trend triggered by prospects for lower U.S. interest rates, higher
oil prices, concern for the growing U.S. Current-Account deficit, and
beliefs that the Bush administration would not act to curb the decline in
the U.S. dollar.

SPECTRUM SELECT

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING LOSSES:
.. Losses were incurred in the global interest rate sector, particularly during
the second and third quarter, from positions in U.S. and Australian interest
rate futures. During January, long positions in U.S. interest rate futures
experienced losses as prices declined following comments from the U.S.
Federal Reserve concerning a shift in the U.S. Federal Reserve's interest
rate policy. Short positions in Australian interest rate futures deepened
sector losses as prices reversed higher during the final week of January.
During April, long U.S. interest rate futures positions incurred losses as
prices tumbled following the release of stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs
data. During May, short positions in global bond futures experienced losses
as prices moved higher during the latter half of the month due to
uncertainty in global equity prices, weaker-than-expected economic data,
stronger energy prices, and geopolitical concerns. During June, short
positions experienced losses as prices rallied on weaker-than-expected
economic reports and expectations that the U.S. Federal Reserve would not
aggressively tighten U.S. interest rates. During July, short positions in
U.S. interest rate futures recorded losses as prices moved higher after the
release of disappointing U.S. unemployment data. Additional losses were
incurred from newly established long U.S. interest rate futures positions
after prices moved lower following Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan's
upbeat assessment of the U.S. economy. During September, long positions in
U.S. interest rate futures resulted in losses as prices declined due to
expectations for rising interest rates prompted by the release of positive
U.S. economic data.

.. Smaller Partnership losses resulted from trading in the global stock index
sector, primarily during the second and third quarter, via positions in
Asian equity index futures. During the second quarter, long positions in
these markets incurred losses as global equity prices were negatively
impacted by geopolitical concerns and expanding energy prices. Newly
established short Asian equity index positions experienced losses as prices
rebounded during the second quarter amid a slight pullback in oil prices and
strong earnings from technology companies. During the third quarter, long
Asian equity index positions experienced losses as prices reversed lower due
to the release of disappointing U.S. employment data, surging energy prices,
and new warnings concerning potential terrorist activity.

SPECTRUM STRATEGIC

[CHART]

Year ended December 31, 2004
----------------------------
Currencies -0.65
Interest Rates 0.96
Stock Indices -2.05
Energies -0.56
Metals 4.67
Agriculturals 8.31

Note: Reflects trading results only and does not include fees or interest
income.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING GAINS:
.. The most significant gains were recorded in the agricultural markets,
primarily during the first five months of the year, from long futures
positions in soybeans, soybean-related products, corn, and sugar. During the
first quarter, soybean and corn prices finished higher, especially during
February, due to increased exports abroad and greater demand from Asia. Long
futures positions in sugar also benefited as prices rallied during April and
June amid diminished market supply, increasing demand and inflation concerns.

.. In the metals markets, gains were recorded primarily during the first
quarter and the final two months of the year, from long futures positions in
base metals. During the first quarter, prices trended higher due to a
declining U.S. dollar and increased demand from Asia. During September, long
base metals futures positions benefited as prices moved higher in response
to continued demand from China and reports of lower-than-expected
inventories. During November and December, long base metals positions
continued to profit from the decline in the U.S. dollar.

.. Relatively smaller Partnership gains achieved in the global interest rate
markets occurred primarily during the first and third quarter of the year
from long positions in European interest rate futures. During the first
quarter, long positions profited as global bond prices rallied in response
to a lack of inflation and no increases in interest rates by the European
Central Bank. Prices also trended higher during March amid uncertainty in
the equity markets, disappointing U.S. economic data and "safe-haven" buying
following the terrorist attack in Madrid. During the third quarter, long
European interest

SPECTRUM STRATEGIC

rate futures positions profited after prices trended higher amid rising oil
prices, a drop in equity prices, and concern for economic growth.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING LOSSES:
.. Losses were incurred in the global stock index markets, primarily during the
first and third quarter of the year. During the first quarter, long European
and Japanese equity index futures positions were unprofitable as equity
prices dropped during February and early March amid weakness in the U.S.
technology sector and growing geopolitical uncertainty. During the third
quarter, long European, Asian, and U.S. stock index futures experienced
losses as prices reversed lower during July due to the release of
disappointing U.S. employment data, surging energy prices, and concern for
potential terrorist attacks.

.. Losses in the currency markets resulted primarily during the first and third
quarter. During the first quarter, long positions in the Japanese yen versus
the U.S. dollar resulted in losses after the Bank of Japan weakened the yen
through currency market intervention activity. During the third quarter,
long European currency positions, such as the Swiss franc and Norwegian
krone versus the U.S. dollar, generated negative performance as the U.S.
dollar reversed higher amid upbeat market sentiment.

.. Smaller losses were recorded in the energy markets, primarily during the
second quarter and the month of November. During the second quarter, losses
resulted from long futures positions in crude oil and its related products,
and natural gas as energy prices declined in response to increases in output
and energy reserves. During November, long positions in natural gas
experienced losses as prices reversed sharply lower amid hefty reserves and
seasonally moderate temperatures.

SPECTRUM TECHNICAL

[CHART]

Year ended December 31, 2004
----------------------------
Currencies -0.23
Interest Rates 9.48
Stock Indices -1.50
Energies 10.88
Metals 0.15
Agriculturals -1.96

Note: Reflects trading results only and does not include fees or interest
income.

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING GAINS:
.. The most significant gains were achieved in the energy markets throughout a
majority of the year from long futures positions in crude oil and its
related products as crude oil prices trended higher in response to rising
demand combined with geopolitical concerns and supply issues.

.. Additional gains resulted in the global interest rate markets during the
first, third, and fourth quarter from long positions in European, Asian, and
U.S. interest rate futures. During the first quarter, long positions
profited as bond prices rallied in response to weak economic data, a lack of
inflation and "safe-haven" buying following the terrorist attack in Madrid.
During the third quarter, long positions benefited from a surge in oil
prices, a drop in equity prices, and a conflicted economic picture. During
the fourth quarter, long positions in European and U.S. interest rate
futures benefited from rising global bond prices triggered by record high
oil prices, growth concerns prompted by weak economic data, and strength in
foreign currencies versus a weaker U.S. dollar. Additional gains were
recorded from long positions in Japanese interest rate futures, which
profited as prices increased amid higher values for the Japanese yen.

.. Smaller gains recorded in the metals markets resulted, primarily during the
first quarter, from long futures positions in base metals after prices
trended higher in response to greater demand from Asia and a declining U.S.
dollar.

SPECTRUM TECHNICAL

FACTORS INFLUENCING ANNUAL TRADING LOSSES:
.. Losses were incurred in the agricultural markets from futures positions in
cocoa and coffee. During January, short futures positions in coffee
experienced losses as prices reversed higher amid tight global supply. Long
coffee positions experienced additional losses as prices reversed lower
during June in response to an increase in Brazilian crop estimates and mild
weather in growing regions. During July, short cocoa futures positions
recorded losses as prices hit five-month highs amid speculative buying and
lower market supply. During September, long cocoa futures positions incurred
losses as prices reversed lower amid news of easing geopolitical tensions
from the Ivory Coast, the world's top cocoa producer. During October, long
futures positions in coffee incurred losses as prices declined due to larger
harvests and greater market supply.

.. Additional losses in the global stock index sector occurred primarily during
the second and third quarter of the year from positions in Asian and
European stock index futures. Long positions in Asian and European stock
index futures also incurred losses during March, April, and May as equity
prices fell in response to the terror attacks in Madrid, continuing
instability in Iraq, and concerns for higher interest rates. During July,
long positions in Asian and European stock index futures also recorded
losses as prices reversed lower due to the release of disappointing U.S.
employment data, surging energy prices, and new warnings concerning
potential terrorist attacks. During August, short positions in Asian and
European equity index futures recorded losses as prices reversed higher in
response to falling energy prices and better-than-expected U.S. Gross
Domestic Product and consumer sentiment data.

.. Smaller losses were incurred in the currency markets primarily from
positions in the Japanese yen between the months of March through August.
Losses were incurred during March from short positions in the Japanese yen
versus the U.S. dollar as the yen reversed higher due to speculation that
the Bank of Japan was relaxing its efforts to weaken the yen. During April,
long positions in the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar resulted in losses
as the U.S. dollar surged following the release of stronger-than-expected
U.S. jobs data. During May, short positions in the Japanese yen versus the
U.S. dollar sustained losses as the U.S. dollar's value declined in response
to fears of potential terrorist attacks, expanding energy prices, and the
release of weaker-than-expected economic data during the latter half of May.
During June, losses were experienced primarily from short positions in the
Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar as the yen climbed higher in response to
better-than-anticipated improvements in Japanese economic data and
speculation that the Bank of Japan would move to raise interest rates.
During July, long positions in the Japanese yen, euro, Swiss franc, British
pound, and Australian dollar, all versus the U.S. dollar, resulted in losses
as the U.S. dollar's value strengthened in response to upbeat market
sentiment. During August, losses resulted from short positions in the
Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar as the U.S. dollar's value decreased due
to concerns for the rate of U.S. economic growth caused by the release of
soft economic data.

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM SERIES

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Demeter Management Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of Morgan
Stanley Spectrum Currency L.P., Morgan Stanley Spectrum Global Balanced L.P.,
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Select L.P., Morgan Stanley Spectrum Strategic L.P.,
and Morgan Stanley Spectrum Technical L.P. (collectively, the "Partnerships"),
is responsible for the management of the Partnerships.

Management of Demeter ("Management") is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

The Partnerships' internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that:

.. Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
Partnerships;

.. Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that the Partnerships' transactions are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of Management and
directors; and

.. Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnerships' assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of each Partnership's internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. In making this assessment,
Management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, M