Back to GetFilings.com

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR SECTION 15(D) OF THE
         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

OR

[  ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
        EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________________ to __________________________.

Commission File Number: 0-18033

EXABYTE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2108 - 55th Street
Boulder, Colorado 80301
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(303) 442-4333
(Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code)

Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.
Yes ___X___   No ______

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes______   No ___X___ 

As of August 2, 2004, there were 108,791,455 shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock (par value $0.001 per share).

(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Exabyte Corporation (the "Company") have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with the annual consolidated financial statements, and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with GAAP. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes the reto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred operating losses for several years, and had a stockholders' deficit of $5,625,000, as of June 30, 2004.

The Company had evaluated various strategic alternatives that would result in increased working capital and liquidity. These alternatives included one or more of the following:

• proceeds from additional debt or equity fund raising activities;
• strategic alliance or business combination;
• restructuring of payment terms of notes payable to suppliers.
• sale of all or a portion of operating assets; or
• continued restructuring of current operations;

As discussed in Note 5, on May 3, 2004, the Company sold preferred stock and common stock purchase warrants for net proceeds of approximately $23,763,000. The proceeds from this transaction, the proceeds from the Media Distribution Agreement with Imation Corp. received in the fourth quarter of 2003, and borrowing availability under the Company's line of credit with a bank, are the Company's primary sources of funds for operations. At June 30, 2004, the Company had working capital of $9,411,000.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of management's estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Accordingly, actual results could differ from the estimates used.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment or delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Generally, these criteria are met upon shipment or delivery of products and transfer of title and risk of loss to customers. Product sales to certain distributors and resellers are subject to agreements allowing certain limited rights of return, marketing related rebates and price protection on unsold merchandise. Accordingly, the Company records an allowance for estimated future returns, marketing rebates and for price protection in the period of the sale based on contractual terms and historical data. The Company sells to certain original equipment manufacturers ("OEM's") and other customers, that require the Company maintain inventory at third party warehouses. Revenue from these sales is recognized when title transfers, which is generally when the OEM or customer takes possession of the inventory fro m the warehouse. Revenue for out-of-warranty service repairs is recorded when the service has been performed and the product has been returned to the customer. Revenue for on-site warranty contracts is deferred and amortized using the straight-line method over the contract period. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold.

The distribution fee received by the Company in connection with the Media Distribution Agreement ("Media Agreement") discussed in Note 8 was recorded as deferred revenue and is being amortized using the straight-line method over ten years, which represents the estimated period over which existing media products will be sold. In addition, under certain circumstances the distribution fee may be refundable on a pro-rata basis over a ten-year period from the date of the Media Agreement.

The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the consolidated corporation including its subsidiaries. For the Company's foreign subsidiaries, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and non-monetary assets are remeasured at historical rates. Results of operations are remeasured using the average exchange rates during the period. The Company recorded net foreign exchange gains (losses) related to these remeasurements of $(27,000) and $(2,000) in the second quarter of 2003 and 2004, respectively, and $(33,000) and $120,000 in the first six months of 2003 and 2004. From time to time, the Company enters into transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies. These transactions are remeasured at the prevailing spot rate upon payment and recorded in the operating account to which the payment relates. Accounts receivable and payable from subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured using period end r ates and transaction gains and losses are recorded. The Company recorded net foreign exchange gains (losses) related to these transactions of $(130,000) and $1,093,000 in the second quarter of 2003 and 2004, respectively, and $(179,000) and $368,000 in the first six months of 2003 and 2004. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company recognized a gain of $685,000 and a gain of $392,000, respectively, related to the translation of a note payable to a supplier denominated in the Yen. In addition, during the first quarter of 2004 the Company's cost of goods sold increased by $488,000 as a result of a supply agreement with a Japanese supplier, which required payment in Yen at a fixed conversion rate. Effective April 1, 2004, purchases under this agreement are made in US dollars.

In June of 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("FAS 141") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("FAS 142").

FAS 141 was effective for the Company for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, and mandates the purchase method to account for all business combinations. The Company accounted for its business combination with Ecrix Corporation ("Ecrix"), which was completed on November 9, 2001, under the provisions of FAS 141. Under the purchase method, the purchase price of an acquired business is allocated to the individual tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. Goodwill is accounted for under the provisions of FAS 142.

The Company adopted FAS 142 on January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting units based upon certain criteria, is tested for impairment upon adoption of FAS142 and annually thereafter, and is no longer amortized. Upon adoption of FAS 142, the Company concluded that it has one reporting unit, and in 2002 the Company completed the transitional and annual impairment tests using the following approach: (1) Calculate the fair value of the Company based on quoted market prices of the Company's stock, and compare such amount with the Company's carrying value (stockholders' equity or deficit), including goodwill; (2) If the fair value of the Company is less than its carrying amount, measure the amount of impairment loss, if any, by comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of such goodwill; (3) If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, recognize that excess as an impairment loss. Using this method, the Company determined that the fair value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeded carrying value as of January 3, 2004 and June 30, 2004 and, accordingly, goodwill is not considered to be impaired.

Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average of all common shares issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings (loss) per share calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. For loss periods, the basic and diluted shares are equal, as the inclusion of potentially dilutive common shares would be anti-dilutive. The Company incurred a net loss for all periods included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and, accordingly basic and diluted shares are equal for all periods presented.

Options to purchase 17,979,000 and 10,057,000 shares of common stock were excluded from dilutive stock option calculations for the three-month periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2004, respectively, because their exercise prices were greater than the average fair market value of the Company's stock for the period, and as such were anti-dilutive. Additionally, options to purchase 31,441,000 shares of common stock were excluded from dilutive stock option calculations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, as these options were anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss incurred.

Options to purchase 15,603,000 and 9,178,000 shares of common stock were excluded from dilutive stock option calculations for the six-month periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2004, respectively, because their exercise prices were greater than the average fair market value of the Company's stock for the period, and as such were anti-dilutive. Additionally, options to purchase 2,345,000 and 32,320,000 shares of common stock were excluded from dilutive stock option calculations for the six-month periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2004, as these options were anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss incurred.

At June 30, 2004, the Company had one series of outstanding preferred stock which is convertible into the Company's common stock. At June 28, 2003, and through May 3, 2004, the Company had several series of outstanding preferred stock which were convertible into the Company's common stock. The assumed conversion of the preferred shares into common stock for the three and six month periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 30, 2004, has been excluded from diluted share calculations, as the effect of the conversion features is anti-dilutive.

In addition, as a result of their anti-dilutive effect, accumulated preferred dividends of 2,082,000 shares of common stock have been excluded from diluted share calculations for the three and six-month periods ended June 28, 2003. The Company had no accumulated dividends at June 30, 2004.

As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for options granted to employees with an exercise price equal to the market value at the date of grant or in connection with the employee stock purchase plan. The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 and related interpretations.

In accordance with the interim disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure-an Amendment of SFAS No. 123," the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value based method of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based compensation.

In June 2004, The Company's shareholders approved and ratified the Exabyte Corporation 2004 Stock Option Plan ("Plan") which provides for the issuance of up to 25,000,000 options to purchase the Company's common stock. Options granted under the Plan are non-qualified and may be granted to employees, directors and consultants under the provisions of the Plan. On June 11, 2004, the Company granted 14,004,500 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.82 per share under the Plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company issued a total of 14,573,000 options to purchase common stock from all of its employee stock option plans at exercise prices ranging from $0.82 to $1.31.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform with the current period presentation.

Inventory, net of reserves for excess quantities and obsolescence, consists of the following:

In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an additional reserve of $6,849,000 for excess and obsolete inventory due to changes in sales forecasts and planned discontinuance of older tape drive and automation products.

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

On June 18, 2002, the Company entered into a $25,000,000 line of credit agreement (the "Agreement") with Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB") that originally expired in June 2005. The agreement was modified several times during 2003 for violations of various financial covenants and to revise certain terms and conditions, including a decrease in maximum borrowings to $20,000,000 and to provide for interest to be charged at a rate of prime plus 5.25%.

On October 10, 2003, the Company entered into the Fifth Modification Agreement, which extended the Agreement through September 30, 2005, under similar terms and conditions. As of January 3, 2004, the Company was in violation of the covenant relating to operating results for the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company obtained a waiver of such covenant violation in March 2004. In May 2004, the Company entered into a revised agreement (the "Revised Agreement"), which provides for borrowings of up to $20,000,000 based on 75% of eligible accounts receivable (as adjusted). Eligible accounts receivable excludes balances greater than 60 days past due, certain foreign receivables and other items defined in the Revised Agreement. No borrowings are available based on inventory balances. Interest is being charged at the prime rate plus 2.0 (6.25%) at June 30, 2004, and the Revised Agreement includes financial covenants relating to operating results, limits on inventory levels with product distributors, the maintenance o f minimum levels of net worth or deficit and prohibits the payment of cash dividends. The Revised Agreement also includes certain acceleration clauses that may cause any outstanding balance to become immediately due in the event of default. As of March 31, 2004, the Company was in violation of the covenant relating to the maintenance of specified levels of net worth or deficit and received a waiver of such violation in April 2004. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the line of credit and had $10,300,000 of borrowing availability under the Revised Agreement.

In April 2003, SVB had notified the Company that it was in an "over advance" state with respect to its line of credit, and that in order for SVB to continue to allow the Company to borrow against the line, the Company was required to cause its CEO and a significant investor ("Guarantors") to agree to guarantee up to a maximum of $2,500,000 for advances in excess of the Company's credit limit (the "Guaranties"). The Company, through an independent committee of its Board, negotiated agreements with the Guarantors, whereby the Guarantors agreed to such a guarantee in exchange for a specific number of shares of the Company's common stock, as discussed below. In addition, SVB required that each of the Guarantors enter into a subordination agreement ("Subordination Agreement"), whereby each Guarantor agreed to subordinate to SVB: (1) all of the Company's present and future indebtedness and obligations to the Guarantor; and (2) all of the Guarantor's present and future security interests in the Company's assets and property. Additional guaranties for $250,000 of excess borrowings were obtained in July 2003 under similar terms. As a result of entering into the Media Distribution Agreement discussed in Note 8, all of the Guaranties were terminated in November 2003.

As consideration for the Guaranties, the Company issued 54,000,000 shares of its common stock. The Company determined the fair value of all of the shares based on the market price of the Company's stock on the date the shares were earned by the Guarantors, and recorded $10,146,000 of stock-based interest-expense during 2003.

In April 2003, the Company issued SVB a fully vested, immediately exercisable and non-forfeitable warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.105 per share pursuant to the Modification Agreement. This warrant was issued as compensation to SVB for continuing to allow access to an extended credit limit while the Company negotiated the series of Guarantee Agreements with its CEO and a significant investor, as discussed above, and was exercised in April 2004.

During 2003, the Company entered into agreements with four of its largest suppliers that converted certain accounts payable and accrued liability amounts outstanding at December 28, 2002, totaling $20,900,000, to unsecured notes payable, which are currently due through 2005 and bear interest at rates ranging from zero to 5%. In September 2003, the Company entered into restructuring and note payable agreements with a fifth supplier, Solectron Corporation ("Solectron"), for $8,991,000 which converted accounts payable and current inventory purchase commitments to a note payable. In May 2004, the Company made a $2,020,000 prepayment on the Solectron note and revised the payment schedule. As of June 30, 2004, all inventory purchase commitments had been satisfied. As of June 30, 2004, the total amount due under all notes payable - suppliers is $15,722,000, which is payable as follows: 2004 - $6,881,000; 2005 - $7,410,000; 2006 - $1,335,000; 2007 - $96,000. The Company accounted for the modification of the l iabilities under EITF 96-19, Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments ("EITF 96-19"). In accordance with the provisions of EITF 96-19, the terms of the notes are not considered to be substantially different than the terms of the original liabilities.

In September 2003, the Company entered into a note payable in the amount of $3,060,000 with the lessor of certain of its former office and manufacturing facilities, in settlement of all past and future amounts due under the lease for such facilities. The note is unsecured, and is payable interest only through September 2008, at which time the entire principal amount is due, and bears interest at the prime rate for the first year (4.25% at June 30, 2004), 6.0% for years two through four and 10.0% for year five. Interest on the note was imputed at a rate of 9.0% over the term of the note and, accordingly, the note was recorded net of discount of $359,000. The 9.0% rate was considered to be a market interest rate based on other borrowings of the Company. The discount is being recognized over the term of the note as additional interest expense using the effective interest method.

On May 3, 2004, the Company completed the sale of 25,000 shares of newly authorized Series AA Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 7,500,000 shares of common stock for total gross proceeds of $25,000,000 (approximately $23,763,000 net of offering costs). The purchase price of the Series AA shares was $1,000 per share and each share is convertible into 1,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and a term of five years and were valued and accounted for using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected life - 3.09 years, volatility - 183%, and risk free interest rate - 3.26%. In addition, in connection with the issuance of the Series AA Preferred Stock, all shareholders of the Company's existing Series H and Series I Preferred Stock exchanged those shares and accumulated dividends, for shares of the Series AA Preferred Stock and common stock purchase warrants on an as-converted common stock equivalent basis. Series AA shares and common stock warrants issued for the exchange totaled 19,909 shares and 5,972,712 warrants. In connection with the exchange, the Company agreed to accrue common stock dividends on the Series I Preferred shares through December 31, 2004. Accordingly, the Series I shareholders received the equivalent of an additional 708,563 shares of common stock as consideration for the exchange, and the Company recognized a deemed dividend equal to the fair value of the additional consideration, including the value of the common stock warrants, of approximately $4,225,000.

Dividends on the Series AA Shares are payable in cash or common stock at an initial rate of 5%, with an increase to 8% after four years, 10% after five years and 12% thereafter. The Company has the right to force conversion of the Series AA shares, which are non-voting, at such time as the Company's common stock has reached specified price parameters, subject to certain limitations. The Series AA shares have a liquidation preference equal to the issuance price, plus accumulated unpaid dividends and are subject to redemption based on the occurrence of certain conditional events, which are generally under the sole control of the Company. The Company is obligated to register the underlying common shares that would be issued upon conversion, as well as a specified number of common shares that would be issued as dividends on the Series AA shares.

All operations of the Company are considered to be in one operating segment and, accordingly, no segment disclosures have been presented. The Company will continue to review the internal reporting structure for future changes that could result in disclosure of additional segments.

The following table details revenue from external customers by geographic area (foreign revenue is based on the country in which the customer is located):

The following table presents revenue by product line:

The following table summarizes revenue from significant customers:

No other customers accounted for 10% or more of net revenue in any of the above periods.

The following table details long-lived asset information by geographic area:

Note 7-COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, the Company is subjected to certain claims, assertions or litigation by outside parties. The outcome of any such contingencies is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of the operations or cash flows of the Company.

In the normal course of business, the Company has made certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These indemnities include intellectual property indemnities to the Company's customers in connection with the sales of its products, indemnities for liabilities associated with the infringement of other parties' technology based upon the Company's products, indemnities to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease, and indemnities to directors and officers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In addition, the Company has contractual commitments to various customers, which could require it to incur costs to repair an endemic defect with respect to its products outside of the normal warranty period if such defect were to occur. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments that the Company could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company does, however, accrue for losses for any known contingent liability, including those that may arise from indemnification provisions, when future payment is probable.

The Company records a liability for the estimated cost of product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. The following table summarizes information related to the Company's accrued warranty liability as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2004:

(In thousands)

On November 7, 2003, the Company entered into a Media Distribution Agreement ("MDA") with Imation whereby the Company granted Imation the exclusive worldwide marketing and distribution rights for the Company's proprietary removable data storage media. In exchange for such rights, Imation paid the Company a distribution fee of $18,500,000, all of which was received by December 31, 2003. The MDA provides for discounted sales prices to Imation and the Company agreed to grant Imation a second security interest in its intellectual property to secure the Company's obligations under the MDA and a seat as an observer on the Company's Board of Directors. The MDA has an indefinite term, but provides for termination by Imation upon 180 days' prior written notice to the Company, or upon a material default by either party. If Imation terminates the MDA because of a material default by Exabyte during the first ten years of the MDA, the Company must pay Imation a prorated portion of the distribution fee based on a ten-year period. If the MDA is terminated by Imation, the Company is not obligated to refund any portion of the distribution fee. In addition, on November 7, 2003, Imation purchased 1,500,000 shares of the Company's Series I Preferred Stock for $1,500,000, which were exchanged for Series AA Preferred shares in May 2004. As of June 30, 2004, the deferred revenue balance related to the distribution fee is approximately $17,421,000, including the current portion of $1,850,000.

The Company has recorded a deferred tax valuation allowance equal to 100% of total deferred tax assets. In recording this allowance, management has considered a number of factors, but primarily, the Company's cumulative operating losses over the prior five years. Management has concluded that a valuation allowance is required for 100% of the total deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

At January 3, 2004, the Company had incurred domestic net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $216,000,000, which expire between 2005 and 2023. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the amount of, and the benefit from, net operating losses that can be carried forward is limited due to a cumulative ownership change of more than 50% over a three-year period, which occurred in November 2001 in connection with the Ecrix merger. The portion of Exabyte's and Ecrix's pre-business combination tax carryovers, totaling $153,000,000, that can be utilized in any one taxable year for federal tax purposes is limited to approximately $1.2 million per year through 2021. Ownership changes after January 3, 2004 could further limit the utilization of the Company's remaining net operating loss carryforward of $63,000,000, in addition to any losses incurred subsequent to January 3, 2004. As of January 3, 2004, the Company had approximately $85,000,000 of total net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset future taxable income.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 ("FIN 46"). The FASB revised FIN No. 46 in December 2003 ("FIN 46R"). Pursuant to FIN 46R, the effective date for applying certain provisions is deferred. FIN 46 provides guidance on the identification of, and financial reporting for, entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights; such entities are known as variable-interest entities. The Company will apply the provisions of FIN 46 prospectively to any variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. Since the Company does not have any current interests in any variable interest entities, the adoption of this interpretation did not have a significant impact on the Company's 2003 financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity ("SFAS 150"). This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. In accordance with the standard, certain financial instruments that embody obligations for the issuer are required to be classified as liabilities. SFAS 150 shall be effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise shall be effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") 150-3 on November 7, 2003 to defer the effective date for applying the provisions of SFAS No. 150 for certain mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests. The Company does not expect the provisions of this statement to have a significant impact on its current or prospective financial statements.

In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF Issue No. 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables ("EITF 00-21"). EITF 00-21 addresses how to determine whether a revenue arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting for the purposes of revenue recognition and how the revenue arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units of accounting. EITF 00-21 applies to all revenue arrangements that the Company enters into after June 27, 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a significant impact on the Company's 2003 consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2003, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, ("SAB 104") which supercedes SAB 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SAB 104's primary purpose is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements and to rescind the SEC s Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers ("FAQ") issued with SAB 101. Selected portions of the FAQ have been incorporated into SAB 104. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material impact on the Company s revenue recognition policies.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve future risks and uncertainties. We may achieve different results than those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. The actual results that we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such risks and uncertainties. Words such as 'believes,' 'anticipates,' 'expects,' 'intends,' 'plans' and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. You should take into account the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004 and other factors described below when considering such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report.

Exabyte Corporation and subsidiaries ("Exabyte" or the "Company") is a leading provider of information storage products, including tape drive products, automated tape libraries and recording media. Our strategic focus is data backup, restoration and archival applications for workstations, midrange computer systems and networks. Computer manufacturers and resellers require a variety of storage products, which vary in price, performance, capacity and form-factor characteristics to meet their needs for reliable data backup, restoration and archival storage increase. Our strategy is to offer a number of products to address a broad range of these requirements. Our tape drive products are based on VXA® and MammothTape™ technologies and our tape library products are based upon VXA, MammothTape and LTO™ (Ultrium™ technologies).

We market our products worldwide to resellers and original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") through offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia Pacific. As discussed below, our proprietary media products are now marketed and distributed by our exclusive worldwide distributor, Imation Corp. ("Imation"). We have also provided repair services directly to OEMs and to our resellers' customers. Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, our outsourcing partner, Teleplan Service Logistics, Inc. ("Teleplan") has provided such services.

In connection with our sales agreements with our reseller channel customers, we may provide inventory price protection, stock rotation rights and short-term marketing and consumer rebate programs. For our largest reseller customers, we generally provide all of the above items. The costs of these rights and programs are significant and are a direct reduction of our revenue, but are necessary to realize increased revenue through this segment of our customers.

OEM customers incorporate our products as part of their own systems, which they then sell to their customers under their own brand name. We work closely with our OEM customers during early product development stages to help ensure our products will readily integrate into the OEMs' systems. We expect that a significant portion of future revenue growth will relate to increased sales to OEMs. Accordingly, expansion of these relationships is a key strategic initiative in the future. In general, sales to OEMs are at lower prices and lower gross margins. Accordingly, it is imperative that we continue to obtain lower product costs for OEM sales to achieve future profitability.

Our business is directly impacted by overall growth in the economies in which we operate and, in particular, in the technology industry sector and business purchasing of technology related products. The downturn in the economy and the resulting decrease in capital investment directly impacted our revenue and operating results in 2003. We believe the improving economic climate in 2004, our increased penetration into OEM customers, and the introduction of new product offerings will provide us with additional business opportunities. However, there can be no assurance that these factors will improve our financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

One of our most significant challenges in 2004 and thereafter will be to continue to reduce our product costs to improve our gross margins. In that regard, we are working with existing hardware and media suppliers to obtain reduced product costs, as well as exploring opportunities to re-locate existing third-party manufacturing to new suppliers and/or geographic locations that will result in decreased costs. In the first quarter of 2004, we began manufacturing certain automation products and components through a supplier located in China and anticipate sourcing more of our products from China-based suppliers in the future. Cost estimates from these suppliers relating to future product manufacturing have been more competitive than cost estimates from certain of our existing suppliers. We were successful in reducing certain of our product costs in the first six months of 2004, and obtaining additional cost reductions is an integral factor in our becoming profitable in the future. However, there can be no as surance that we will indeed achieve such cost reductions in the future.

Expense control was a key business initiative for us in 2003, and will continue to be so in 2004. As we continue to focus on increasing revenue and improving our gross margins, constant or decreasing operating costs is an important factor in improving our operating results. While we believe our compliment of personnel and our overall cost structure are appropriate to support our current and an expanded level of operations, an increase in operating costs in the future, particularly as a percentage of revenue, would negatively impact our operating results.

Our key performance metrics are revenue, gross margin, and operating income or loss, including related operating expenses. As noted above, increasing sales to OEM customers, achieving reduced product costs from existing and new suppliers, and disciplined operating expense control measures are critical components of our overall business strategy. In addition, providing timely and responsive product warranty and repair services to our customers is also a standard by which we measure our performance. We believe the outsourcing of our warranty and repair function during 2003, as discussed below, is a key component in meeting this performance standard and creating future customer loyalty for our products.

On May 3, 2004, we completed the sale of 25,000 shares of newly authorized Series AA preferred stock, and warrants to purchase 7,500,000 shares of common stock, for $1,000 per share, for total gross proceeds of $25,000,000. Each share of Series AA preferred has an initial dividend rate of 5% and is convertible into 1,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share. The warrants have a term of five years and an exercise price of $1.00 per share. In addition, in connection with the issuance of the Series AA preferred stock, all shareholders of the Company's existing Series H and Series I preferred stock exchanged such shares, and accumulated dividends, for shares of Series AA preferred, on an as-converted common stock equivalent basis, and warrants. See Note 5 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on these transactions.

As noted above, in November 2003, we entered into a Media and Distribution Agreement with Imation, whereby we granted Imation exclusive worldwide marketing and distribution rights for our proprietary removable data storage media. In exchange for such rights, Imation paid us a one-time distribution fee of $18,500,000 and also purchased 1,500,000 shares of Series I Preferred stock for $1,500,000. These shares were exchanged for Series AA preferred stock in May 2004 as noted above. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Note 8 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.

In July 2003, we entered into an agreement to outsource our repair and service functions to an outside third party, Teleplan Service Logistics, Inc. ("Teleplan"). The agreement provides for the Company to sell parts and service inventory to Teleplan and provides for the payment of future royalties to us by Teleplan for certain out-of-warranty repair services. In addition, we reimburse Teleplan for specified product warranty related services.

The supply agreement with one of our Japan-based suppliers, as well as a note payable to that supplier, has provided for payments in Yen at a fixed conversion rate. During the last four months of 2003 and the first quarter of 2004, the dollar weakened against the Yen, resulting in a loss on foreign currency translation relating to the note payable of $1,634,000 in 2003 and $293,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, and increased product costs totaling $1,381,000 during 2003 and $488,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Total loss on foreign currency translation for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was $603,000. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the dollar strengthened against the yen and we recognized a gain related to the translation of the note payable of $685,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Total gain on foreign currency translation for the three and six months ended was $1,091,000 and $488,000, respectively. Effective April 1, 2004, all product purchase s from the supplier are paid in U.S. dollars at a fixed price. Payments on the note payable continue to be in Yen at the fixed conversion rate. As a result, the Company may be exposed to the impact of additional fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in the future and the impact could be significant.

Effective April 1, 2004