FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004
Commission file number 0-17711
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida 59-2852555
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code (727) 567-4830
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Units of Limited Partnership Interest
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Sec. 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X
Number of Record Holders
Title of Class as of March 31, 2004
Limited Partnership Interest 2,043
General Partner Interest 2
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III and IV - Registration Form S-11 and
all Amendments and Supplements thereto.
File No. 33-18142
PART I
Item 1. Business
Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. ("Gateway") is a Florida limited partnership. The general partners are Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner, and Raymond James Partners, Inc. both of which are sponsors of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc. Gateway was formed October 27, 1987 and commenced operations as of June 30, 1988 with the first admission of Limited Partners.
Gateway is engaged in only one industry segment, to acquire limited partnership interests in unaffiliated limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships"), each of which owns and operates one or more apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Tax Credits"), received over a ten year period. Subject to certain limitations, Tax Credits may be used by Gateway's investors to reduce their income tax liability generated from other income sources. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of its Limited Partnership Agreement. Gateway closed its initial offering of Limited Partnership Interests on March 1, 1990 after receiving capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and $25,566,000 from Limited Partners.
Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and Tax Credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of interests in Project Partnerships will be allocated as described in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
Gateway has invested in 82 Project Partnerships, acquiring a 99% interest in these properties by becoming the sole limited partner in the Project Partnerships that own the properties. In October, 1996 Value Partners, Inc., an affiliate of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., became the sole general partner of one of the Project Partnerships, Village Apartments of Sparta, Limited Partnership ("Sparta"). In October, 1997, Value Partners became the sole general partner of Village Apartments of Divernon ("Divernon") See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional details.
The primary sources of funds for the year ended March 31, 2004 were from the maturity of Treasury Notes for $514,000, interest income of $5,497 earned on cash and cash equivalents, and $774,633 in distributions received from Project Partnerships. As of March 31, 2004 Gateway had $1,092,672 of Cash and Cash Equivalents and $139,045 in investments in securities with annual an annual maturity of $142,000 due in 2005, which will be used to meet future annual operating needs of Gateway.
All Project Partnerships are government subsidized. Most have mortgage loans from the Farmers Home Administration (now called USDA Rural Development) ("USDA RD") under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949. These mortgage loans are made at low interest rates for multi-family housing in rural and suburban areas, with the requirement that the interest savings be passed on to low income tenants in the form of lower rents. A significant portion of the Project Partnerships also receive rental assistance from USDA RD to subsidize certain qualifying tenants.
The General Partners do not believe the Project Partnerships are subject to the risks generally associated with conventionally financed nonsubsidized apartment properties. Risks related to the operations of Gateway are described in detail on pages 21 through 33 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption "Risk Factors" which is incorporated herein by reference.
The investment objectives of Gateway are to:
1) Provide tax benefits to Limited Partners in the form of Tax Credits during the period in which each Project is eligible to claim tax credits;
2) Preserve and protect the capital contributions of Investors;
3) Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Projects; and
4) Provide passive losses to individual investors to offset passive income from other passive activities, and provide passive losses to corporate investors to offset business income.
The investment objectives and policies of Gateway are described in detail on pages 33 through 38 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption "Investment Objectives and Policies" which is incorporated herein by reference.
Gateway's goal was to invest in a diversified portfolio of Project Partnerships located in rural and suburban locations with a high demand for low-income housing. As of March 31, 2004 the capital contributions raised from Limited Partner investors were successfully invested in Project Partnerships which met the investment criteria. Management anticipates that competition for tenants will only be with other low income housing projects, and not with conventionally financed housing. With significant number of rural American households living below the poverty level in substandard housing, management believes there will be a continuing demand for affordable low income housing for the foreseeable future.
Exit Strategy
The IRS compliance period for low-income housing tax credit properties is generally 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion. Now these very first programs are completing their compliance period.
With that in mind, the Partnership is continuing to review the Partnership's holdings, with special emphasis on the more mature properties such as any that have satisfied the IRS compliance requirements. The Partnership's review will consider many factors including extended use requirements on the property (such as those due to mortgage restrictions or state compliance agreements), the condition of the property, and the tax consequences to the investors from the sale of the property.
Upon identifying those properties with the highest potential for a successful sale, refinancing or syndication, the Partnership expects to proceed with efforts to liquidate those properties. The Partnership's objective is to maximize the investor's return wherever possible and ultimately, to wind down those funds that no longer provide tax benefits to investors. As of March 31, 2004, two project partnerships, Clayfed Apartments and Westside Apartments have been sold.
Gateway has no direct employees. The General Partners have full and exclusive discretion in management and control of Gateway.
Item 2. Properties
Gateway owns interest in properties through 99% limited partnership interests in 80 Project Partnerships. There are no investments in individual Project Partnerships which are material to Gateway taken as a whole with the largest single net investment comprising 20.0% of Gateway's total assets. The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest, excluding Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2003:
|
|
|||||
|
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Rivermeade Laurel Woods Keysville Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts. |
Medway, OH Union, OH Bernalillo, NM Truth/Conseqnces, NM Fortville, IN Summitville, IN Yanceyville, NC Millsboro, DE Perryville, MD Georgetown, DE Federalsburg, MD Laurel, DE Easton, MD Madison, OH Thomaston, GA Cairo, GA Sylacauga, AL Monroe, GA Silver City, NM Yorktown, VA Ashland, VA Keysville, VA Kalamazoo, MI Demopolis, AL McDonough, GA Fernandina Beach, FL Limestone, ME Beaufort, NC Rigby, ID Albany, KY Burkesville, KY Scotts Hill, TN Gallup, NM Cascade, ID Middleport, NY Columbus, NE Morgantown, IN Ashburn, GA Cuthbert, GA Melrose, FL Crescent City, FL Hastings, FL Norfolk, NE Springfield, TN Springfield, TN Mabank, TX Buena Vista, GA Elizabethtown, NC Quitman, GA Cherokee, AL Milton, FL Winder, GA Killen, AL Madison, NC Greeneville, TN Centralia, IL Poteau, OK Barling, AR Booneville, AR Augusta, KS Farmville, VA Kenly, NC Athens, TX Waggaman, LA Middlefield, OH Floresvile, TX Mathis, TX Sabinal, TX Kingsland, TX Crestline, OH Poteau, OK Decatur, AR Broken Bow, OK Grove, OK Grangeville, ID Hartwell, GA Pulaski, VA Jacksonville, TX |
48 30 54 42 24 24 40 32 32 32 32 32 16 40 50 36 45 48 41 80 40 24 201 40 46 46 25 40 40 24 24 12 44 16 25 24 24 41 32 16 36 24 72 48 48 42 25 32 18 24 43 48 40 40 40 24 32 48 50 66 40 48 44 43 36 40 36 24 34 36 19 24 46 42 32 24 44 40 |
6/88 6/88 8/88 9/88 11/88 11/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 3/89 3/89 3/89 3/89 4/89 5/89 6/89 6/89 6/89 6/89 6/89 7/89 7/89 7/89 7/89 8/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 10/89 11/89 11/89 11/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 2/90 2/90 2/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 7/90 7/90 |
1,862,433 1,194,871 2,094,190 1,824,392 810,389 879,994 2,151,340 1,319,398 1,421,726 1,396,502 1,478,722 1,395,462 743,255 1,478,675 1,812,786 1,192,946 1,621,553 1,788,673 1,766,526 3,046,646 1,549,636 914,521 6,256,843 1,482,309 1,777,326 1,682,738 1,420,783 1,963,249 1,846,528 937,557 919,438 510,427 1,998,767 614,158 1,167,852 1,029,546 959,783 1,300,760 1,028,295 573,562 1,238,885 863,203 3,196,962 1,831,965 1,545,003 1,402,843 814,227 1,497,433 607,608 1,007,828 1,344,167 1,762,725 1,420,816 1,874,064 1,560,298 976,228 716,016 1,152,864 1,682,587 2,381,719 1,588,193 1,711,475 1,364,541 1,519,306 1,350,227 1,312,062 1,084,390 780,115 1,160,610 1,373,883 583,005 969,816 1,957,868 1,558,446 1,480,991 821,329 1,848,539 1,236,142 |
96% 100% 96% 83% 96% 83% 95% 100% 94% 97% 100% 78% 100% 100% 98% 100% 93% 96% 98% 92% 95% 88% 96% 95% 98% 98% 88% 100% 100% 83% 88% 92% 91% 94% 96% 58% 96% 100% 97% 94% 90% 96% 94% 100% 98% 99% 100% 94% 88% 100% 100% 100% 95% 95% 98% 92% 91% 79% 100% 88% 93% 96% 89% 100% 100% 100% 97% 92% 100% 92% 100% 96% 93% 98% 84% 100% 100% 100% |
|
-----3,014 |
---------- |
||||
The average effective rental per unit is $3,972 per year ($331 per month).
The average effective occupancy rate at December 31, 2003 was 94.6%
A summary of the cost of the properties, excluding Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows:
|
12/31/03 |
12/31/02 |
12/31/01 |
|
|
Land |
$ 4,908,530 |
$ 5,128,526 |
$ 5,097,275 |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Gateway is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
As of March 31, 2004, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Securities and Related Security Holder Matters
(a) Gateway's Limited Partnership interests are not publicly traded. There is no market for the Registrant's Limited Partnership interests and it is unlikely that any will develop. No transfers of Limited Partnership Units are permitted without the prior written consent of the Managing General Partner. There have been several transfers over the last two years, with most being from individuals to their trusts or heirs. The Managing General Partner is not aware of the price at which the units are &
nbsp; transferred. The conditions under which investors may transfer units is found under ARTICLE XII - "Transfer of a Limited Partnership Interest" on pages A-24 and A-25 of the Limited Partnership Agreement within the Prospectus, which is incorporated herein by reference.
There have been no distributions paid to the Limited Partner investors over the last five years.
(b) Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders:
Number of Record Holders
Title of Class as of March 31, 2004
Limited Partnership Interest 2,043
General Partner Interest 2
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
Total Revenues |
$ 301,972 |
$ 356,006 |
$ 412,005 |
$ 423,174 |
$ 441,466 |
|
Net Loss |
(55,577) |
(771,799) |
(577,139) |
(787,797) |
(877,394) |
|
Equity in Income (Losses) of Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
3,360,108 |
4,334,857 |
4,946,571 |
5,375,816 |
5,980,554 |
|
Investments In Project Partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Limited Partnership Unit: (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
(3.08) |
(29.89) |
(22.35) |
(30.51) |
(33.98) |
(A) The Tax information is as of December 31, the year end of the Partnership for tax purposes.
The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This statement is not covered by the auditor's opinion included elsewhere in this report.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations -
As disclosed on the Statements of Operations, revenues and expenses were comparable for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, except as described below.
Two of the Project Partnerships, Clayfed Apartments, Ltd. and Westside Apartments, Ltd., sold their property in July 2003 and subsequently liquidated. The sale of the properties resulted in a gain allocated to Gateway of $1,792,746. Gateway received sale proceeds totaling $674,675, of which $672,175 was distributed to the Limited Partners at $26.29 per limited partnership unit. Gateway had previously suspended losses reported by these Project Partnerships in conformity with its policy to not record losses which reduce the investment below zero. As a result of the net increase in the investment from the sale transactions, Gateway was able to recognize $916,962 in previously suspended losses. Gateway's ending investment in these Project Partnerships, after adjusting for the gain on sale, cash proceeds received and suspended losses, was $106,473, which is reported as a loss on disposition in the Combined Statements of Operations.
For the year ended March 31, 2004 the Project Partnerships reported a loss of $227,721, while a loss of $253,927 was reported for the year ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in the reported loss was due to a decrease in rental expenses at the Project Partnership level; however it is customary in the real estate industry to experience losses for financial and tax reporting purposes because of the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization. As a result, management expects Gateway will continue to report its equity in Project Partnerships as a loss for tax and financial reporting purposes.
In total, the Partnership reported a loss of $55,577 for the year ended March 31, 2004. However, after adjusting for amortization, accreted interest income, the changes in operating assets and liabilities, and the equity in losses of Project Partnerships, net cash used in operating activities was $520,920. The net cash provided by investing activities was $948,248 consisting of $774,633 in cash distributions received from Project Partnerships and $173,988 from matured Zero Coupons.
On October 1, 1997 Value Partners, Inc. became the sole general partner of Village Apartments of Divernon Limited Partnership ("Divernon"), replacing the former general partners. Value Partners, Inc. is an affiliate of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the managing general partner of Gateway. Divernon is a 12 unit property located in Divernon, Illinois in which Gateway invested as the sole limited partner on October 1, 1989. The property's average occupancy rate for the year declined from 100% in 2003 to 67% in 2004. Gateway loaned Divernon $10,000, $12,000, and $6,000 to cover the operating deficits for 2001, 2002, and 2003 respectively. As of June 30, 1999, an updated workout plan with the USDA RD was implemented. Management is using rent incentives, vigorous advertising, and tight controls over repairs and maintenance to improve occupancy and cash flows in 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources -
Gateway's capital resources are used to pay General and Administrative operating costs including personnel, supplies, data processing, travel, and legal and accounting associated with the administration and monitoring of Gateway and the Project Partnerships. The capital resources are also used to pay the Asset Management Fee due the Managing General Partner, but only to the extent that Gateway's remaining resources are sufficient to fund Gateway's ongoing needs. (Payment of any Asset Management Fee due but unpaid at the time Gateway sells its interests in the Project Partnerships is subordinated to the investors return of their original capital contribution.)
The sources of funds to pay the operating costs are short term investments and interest earned thereon, the maturity of U.S. Treasury Security Strips ("Zero Coupon Treasuries") which were purchased with funds set aside for this purpose, and cash distributed to Gateway from the operations of the Project Partnerships. At March 31, 2004, Gateway had $1,092,672 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). It also had $139,045 in Zero Coupon Treasuries with maturities providing $142,000 in fiscal year 2005. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet Gateway's current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.
For the year ending March 31, 2004, Gateway received $774,633 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and it received $514,000 from the matured Zero Coupon Treasuries. The General and Administrative operating costs were $175,415 and the Asset Management Fee actually paid was $649,500.
Exit Strategy
The IRS compliance period for low-income housing tax credit properties is generally 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion. Now these very first programs are completing their compliance period.
With that in mind, the Partnership is continuing to review the Partnership's holdings, with special emphasis on the more mature properties such as any that have satisfied the IRS compliance requirements. The Partnership's review will consider many factors including extended use requirements on the property (such as those due to mortgage restrictions or state compliance agreements), the condition of the property, and the tax consequences to the investors from the sale of the property.
Upon identifying those properties with the highest potential for a successful sale, refinancing or syndication, the Partnership expects to proceed with efforts to liquidate those properties. The Partnership's objective is to maximize the investors' return wherever possible and, ultimately, to wind down those funds that no longer provide tax benefits to investors. As of March 31, 2004, two project partnerships, Clayfed Apartments and Westside Apartments have been sold.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of
Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. (a Florida Limited Partnership) as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related combined statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2004. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of certain Project Partnerships for which $14,924,730 and $14,655,624 of cumulative equity in losses are included in these financial statements as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively and for which net losses of $130,296, $256,716 and $202,918 are included in the accompanying financial statements for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2004. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furni
shed to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for such underlying partnerships, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed under Item 14(a)(2) in the index are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, fairly state in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co.
SPENCE, MARSTON, BUNCH, MORRIS & CO.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Clearwater, Florida
June 22, 2004
PART I - Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002:
|
|
Limited Partners |
General Partners |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2001 |
$ 1,141,068 |
$ (214,726) |
$ 926,342 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
$ 28,635 |
$ 28,631 |
$ 28,373 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.
(A Florida Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION:
Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. ("Gateway"), a Florida Limited Partnership, was formed October 27, 1987 under the laws of Florida. Operations commenced on June 30, 1988. Gateway invests, as a limited partner, in other limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships"), each of which owns and operates apartment complexes expected to qualify for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement. Gateway closed the offering on March 1, 1990 after receiving Limited and General Partner capital contributions of $25,566,000 and $1,000, respectively. The fiscal year of Gateway for reporting purposes ends on March 31.
Raymond James Partners, Inc. and Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc., are the General Partner and Managing General Partner, respectively. The Managing General Partner manages and controls the business of Gateway.
Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and tax credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of properties will be allocated as formulated in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Combined Statements
The accompanying statements include, on a combined basis, the accounts of Gateway, Village Apartments of Sparta Limited Partnership and Village Apartments of Divernon Limited Partnership ("Combined Entities"), two Project Partnerships in which Gateway has invested. As of October 1, 1996 and October 1, 1997, respectively, an affiliate of Gateway's Managing General Partner, Value Partners, Inc. became the general partner of the Combined Entities. Since the general partner of the Combined Entities is now an affiliate of Gateway, these combined financial statements include the financial activity of the Combined Entities for all years presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Gateway has elected to report the results of operations of the Combined Entities on a 3-month lag basis, consistent with the presentation of financial information of all Project Partnerships.
Basis of Accounting
Gateway utilizes the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when obligations are incurred.
Gateway accounts for its investments as the sole limited partner in Project Partnerships ("Investments in Project Partnerships"), with the exception of the Combined Entities, using the equity method of accounting, because management believes that Gateway does not have a majority control of the major operating and financial policies of the Project Partnerships in which it invests, and reports the equity in losses of the Project Partnerships on a 3-month lag in the Statements of Operations. Under the equity method, the Investments in Project Partnerships initially include:
1) Gateway's capital contribution,
2) Acquisition fees paid to the General Partner for services rendered in selecting properties for acquisition, and
3) Acquisition expenses including legal fees, travel and other miscellaneous costs relating to acquiring properties.
Quarterly the Investments in Project Partnerships are increased or decreased as follows:
1) Increased for equity in income or decreased for equity in losses of the Project Partnerships,
2) Decreased for cash distributions received from the Project Partnerships and,
3) Decreased for the amortization of the acquisition fees and expenses.
Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over 35 years, as this is the average estimated useful life of the underlying assets. The net amortization is as amortization expense on the Statements of Operations.
Pursuant to the limited partnership agreements for the Project Partnerships, cash losses generated by the Project Partnerships are allocated to the general partners of those partnerships. In subsequent years, cash profits, if any, are first allocated to the general partners to the extent of the allocation of prior years' cash losses.
Since Gateway invests as a limited partner, and therefore is not obligated to fund losses or make additional capital contributions, it does not recognize losses from individual Project Partnerships to the extent that these losses would reduce the investment in those Project Partnerships below zero. The suspended losses will be used to offset future income from the individual Project Partnerships.
Gateway reviews its investments in Project Partnerships to determine if there has been any permanent impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the investment, Gateway recognizes an impairment loss. No impairment loss has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements.
Gateway, as a limited partner in the Project Partnerships, is subject to risks inherent in the ownership of property which are beyond its control, such as fluctuations in occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, proper maintenance and continued eligibility of tax credits. If the cost of operating a property exceeds the rental income earned thereon, Gateway may deem it in its best interest to voluntarily provide funds in order to protect its investment. However, Gateway does not guarantee any of the mortgages or other debt of the Project Partnerships.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
It is Gateway's policy to include short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less in Cash and Cash Equivalents. Short-term investments are comprised of money market mutual funds.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due from project partnerships for voluntary operating advances made by the Partnership and tenant receivables. The operating advances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand. Tenant receivables are recorded when billed. An allowance for doubtful accounts has not been considered necessary based on historical loss experience. An account is considered past due when payment has not been rendered within thirty days of its due date. Uncollectible receivables are charged to rental revenue when project management has determined that collection efforts will not be successful.
Capitalization and Depreciation
Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost and provides for depreciation using the modified accelerated cost recovery system method for financial and tax reporting purposes in amounts adequate to amortize costs over the lives of the applicable assets as follows:
Buildings 27-1/2 years
Equipment 7 years
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon disposal of depreciable property, the appropriate property accounts are reduced by the related costs and accumulated depreciation. The resulting gains and losses are reflected in the statement of income.
Rental Income
Rental income, principally from short-term leases on the Combined Entity's apartment units, is recognized as income under the accrual method as the rents become due.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject Gateway to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash investments in a money market mutual fund that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. These estimates are based on management's knowledge and experience. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Investment in Securities
Effective April 1, 1995, Gateway adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("FAS 115"). Under FAS 115, Gateway is required to categorize its debt securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading securities, dependent upon Gateway's intent in holding the securities. Gateway's intent is to hold all of its debt securities (U. S. Treasury Security Strips) until maturity and to use these reserves to fund Gateway's ongoing operations. Interest income is recognized ratably on the U.S. Treasury Strips using the effective yield to maturity.
Income Taxes
No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements, as income taxes are a liability of the partners rather than of Gateway.
Reclassifications
For comparability, the 2002 and 2003 figures have been reclassified, where appropriate to conform with the financial statement presentation used in 2004.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No. 144 provides accounting guidance for financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of". SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002. The adoption did not have an effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Partnership.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51." FIN46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity to not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN46 is effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2004. The Partnership does not feel that there will be any effects on its results of operations as a result of the adoption of FIN46. Prior to the effective date of FIN 46, Gatew
ay is required to disclose its maximum exposure to economic and financial statement losses as a result of its involvement with variable interest entities. Gateway's exposure to these losses is limited to its investment in the Project Partnerships which is $1,355,760 at March 31, 2004.
NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES:
The March 31, 2004 Balance Sheet includes Investments in Securities equal to $139,045. These investments consist of U. S. Treasury Security Strips at their cost, plus accreted interest income of $79,905. The estimated market value at March 31, 2004 of these debt securities is $141,485 resulting in a gross unrealized gain of $2,440.
As of March 31, 2004, the cost and accreted interest by contractual maturities
is as follows:
Due within 1 year $ 139,045
After 1 year through 5 years 0
----------
Total Amount Carried on Balance Sheet $139,045
==========
NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. It is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing. Within the next 12 months, the Managing General Partner does not intend to demand payment on the portion of Asset Management Fees payable classified as long-term on the Balance Sheet.
The General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses as follows:
Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to an annual asset management fee equal to 0.45% of the aggregate cost of Gateway's interest in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $479,165, $491,021 and $493,205 respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses - Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner, is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. These expenses are included in the Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $117,118, $68,891 and $45,714 respectively.
NOTE 5 - RENTAL PROPERTY
A summary of the rental property is as follows at December 31, 2003:
|
|
Accumulated |
Book |
|
|
Land |
$ 47,000 |
$ 0 |
$ 47,000 |
A summary of the rental property is as follows at December 31, 2002:
|
|
Accumulated |
Book |
|
|
Land |
$ 47,000 |
$ 0 |
$ 47,000 |
NOTE 6 - MORTGAGE NOTE PAYABLE
The mortgage note payable for Sparta is the balance due on the note dated December 1, 1998 in the amount of $827,361. The loan is at a stated interest rate of 6.125% for a period of 50 years, the loan also contains a provision for an interest subsidy which reduces the effective interest rate to 2.325%. At December 31, 2003 the development was in compliance with the terms of the subsidy agreement and is receiving the reduced rate which makes the monthly payments $1,925.75.
Expected maturities of the mortgage note payable are as follows:
Year Ending Amount
----------- --------
12/31/04 4,738
12/31/05 4,846
12/31/06 4,955
12/31/07 5,067
12/31/08 5,182
Thereafter 798,037
----------
Total $ 822,825
==========
The mortgage note payable for Divernon is the balance due on the note dated October 2, 1989 in the amount of $416,113. The loan is at a stated interest rate of 8.75% for a period of 50 years, the loan also contains a provision for an interest subsidy which reduces the effective interest rate to 2.35%. At December 31, 2003 the development was in compliance with the terms of the subsidy agreement and is receiving the reduced rate which makes the monthly payment $883.
Expected maturities of the mortgage note payable are as follows:
Year Ending Amount
----------- --------
12/31/04 1,706
12/31/05 1,744
12/31/06 1,783
12/31/07 1,823
12/31/08 1,864
Thereafter 393,328
----------
Total $ 402,248
==========
NOTE 7 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):
The following is a reconciliation between Net Loss as described in the financial statements and the Partnership loss for tax purposes:
|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
Net Loss per Financial Statements |
$ (55,577) |
$ (771,799) |
$ (577,139) |
|
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes in excess of losses for financial statement purposes |
|
|
|
|
Losses suspended for financial reporting purposes |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end |
|
|
|
|
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: |
|
|
|
|
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The Partnership's Investment in Project Partnerships is approximately $23,177,288 higher for financial reporting purposes than for tax return purposes because (i) annual tax depreciation expense is higher than financial depreciation, (ii) certain expenses are not deductible for tax return purposes and (iii) losses are suspended for financial purposes but not for tax return purposes.
The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Fund for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2004 are as follows:
Financial Tax
Reporting Reporting
Purposes Purposes Differences
Investments in Local
Limited Partnerships $ 1,355,760 $(21,821,528) $23,177,288
Other Assets $ 2,004,348 $ 1,842,467 $ 161,881
Liabilities $ 4,578,974 $ 112,816 $ 4,466,158
NOTE 8 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS:
As of March 31, 2004, the Partnership had acquired a 99% interest in the profits, losses and tax credits as a limited partner in 80 Project Partnerships, excluding the Combined Entities, which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes.
Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution proceeds will be distributed according to each Partnership agreement.
The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships, excluding the Combined Entities at March 31, 2004:
|
MARCH 31, 2004 |
MARCH 31, 2003 |
||
|
Capital Contributions to Project Partner-ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships |
|
|
(1) In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $16,608,534 for the year ended March 31, 2004 and cumulative suspended losses of $15,252,541 for the year ended March 31, 2003 are not included.
The Partnership's equity as reflected by the Project Partnerships of $17,517,241 differs from the Partnership's Investments in Project Partnerships before acquisition fees and expenses and amortization of $(280,649) primarily because of suspended losses on the Partnership's books.
NOTE 8 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (continued):
In accordance with the Partnership's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships, excluding the Combined Entity beginning on the date of combination, on a three month lag, below is the summarized financial information for the Series' Project Partnerships as of December 31 of each year:
|
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|
|
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
|
Two of the Project Partnerships, Clayfed Apartments, Ltd. and Westside Apartments, Ltd., sold their property in July 2003 and subsequently liquidated. The sale of the properties resulted in a gain allocated to Gateway of $1,792,746. Gateway received sale proceeds totaling $674,675, of which $672,675 was distributed to the Limited Partners at $26.29 per limited partnership unit. Gateway had previously suspended losses reported by these Project Partnerships in conformity with its policy to not record losses which reduce the investment below zero. As a result of the net increase in the investment from the sale transactions, Gateway was able to recognize $916,962 in previously suspended losses. Gateway's ending investment in these Project Partnerships, after adjusting for the gain on sale, cash proceeds received and suspended losses, was $106,473, which is reported as a loss on disposition in the Combined Statements of Operations.
As of December 31, 2003, the largest Project Partnership constituted 7.4% and 7.7% of the combined total assets and combined total revenues. As of December 31, 2002, the largest Project Partnership constituted 7.2% and 7.4% of the combined total assets and combined total revenues.
NOTE 9 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
Year 2004 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2003 9/30/2003 12/31/2003 3/31/2004
Total Revenues $ 89,820 $ 55,817 $ 53,243 $ 103,092
Net Income (Loss) $(161,360) $ (51,041) $ 619,608 $(462,784)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (6.25) $ (1.98) $ 23.99 $ (18.84)
Year 2003 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
6/30/2002 9/30/2002 12/31/2002 3/31/2003
Total Revenues $ 98,586 $ 59,651 $ 62,912 $ 134,857
Net Income (Loss) $(171,285) $(192,001) $(170,835) $(237,678)
Earnings (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Beneficial Assignee
Certificates Outstanding $ (6.63) $ (7.43) $ (6.62) $ (9.21)
Schoonover Boyer & Associates
383 North Front Street
Columbus, OH 43215
PHONE: 614-888-8000
FAX: 614-888-8634
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners
Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend
Housing Association Limited Partnership
(a Michigan Limited Partnership)
Kalamazoo, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, (a Michigan Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, statements of partners' equity (deficit), and statements of cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Schoonover Boyer & Associates
Columbus, Ohio
January 22, 2004
Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus OH 43235-5423
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners of 9;
Rural Housing Service
Madison, Ltd. 9;
Servicing Office
DBA Madison Woods Apartments Wooster, Ohio
Ravenna, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Madison, Ltd. (a limited partnership), DBA Madison Woods Apartments, Case No. 41-043-341595553, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, the evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Madison, Ltd., DBA Madison Woods Apartments, Case No. 41-043-341595553, at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program", issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 20, 2004, on our consideration of Madison, Ltd.'s internal control and on compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants
Columbus, Ohio
January 20, 2004
Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
8001 Ravines Edge Court, Suite 112
Columbus, OH 43235-5423
PHONE: 614-825-0011
FAX: 614-825-0014
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners of Rural Housing Service
Middlefield, Limited Servicing Office
DBA Lakeview Village II Wooster, Ohio
Ravenna, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Middlefield, Limited (a limited partnership), DBA Lakeview Village II, Case No. 41-028-341618469, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Middlefield, Limited, DBA Lakeview Village II, Case No. 41-028-341618469, at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration "Audit Program," issued in December 1989, we have also issued a report dated January 20, 2004, on our consideration of Middlefield, Limited's internal control and on compliance with specific requirements applicable to Rural Housing Service Programs. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.
/s/ Fentress, Brown, CPAs & Associates, LLC
Certified Public Accountants
Columbus, Ohio
January 20, 2004
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Road - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners
Ashburn Housing Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ashburn Housing, Ltd. (a Limited Partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1830643, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ashburn Housing, Ltd. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 22, 2004 on our consideration of Ashburn Housing, Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 22, 2004 on its compliance with laws and regulations. There reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 22, 2004
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Road - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners
Buena Vista Housing, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Buena Vista Housing, Ltd. (a Limited Partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1830642, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Buena Vista Housing, Ltd. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 22, 2004 on our consideration of Buena Vista Housing Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 22, 2004 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 22, 2004
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Road - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners
Cuthbert Elderly Housing, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cuthbert Elderly Housing, Ltd. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1830589, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cuthbert Elderly Housing, Ltd. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 22, 2004 on our consideration of Cuthbert Elderly Housing Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 22, 2004 on its compliance with laws and regulations. These reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 22, 2004
Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
3488 N. Valdosta Road - P.O. Box 2241
Valdosta, GA 31604-2241
PHONE: 229-245-6040
FAX: 229-245-1669
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners
Hannah's Mill Apartments, Ltd.
Valdosta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hannah's Mill Apartments, Ltd. (a limited partnership), Federal ID No.: 58-1786726, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hannah's Mill Apartments, Ltd. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 22, 2004 on our consideration of Hannah's Mill Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control structure and a report dated January 22, 2004 on its compliance with laws and regulations. There reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits.
/s/ Henderson & Godbee, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
January 22, 2004
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30342
PHONE: 404-892-9651
FAX: 404-876-3913
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
- ----------------------------
To the Partners of
Milton Elderly Housing, LTD, LLLP
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of MILTON ELDERLY HOUSING, LTD, LLLP (USDA Rural Development Case No.09-057-592911560), a limited partnership, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the Audit Program of the Rural Development Services Office of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, formerly known as the Farmers Home Administration. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obta