Back to GetFilings.com

(Mark One)

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

[  ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number 33-21220*

    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes    X       No

    Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 

*  Registrant is the wholly owned subsidiary of UAL Corporation (File 1-6033).  Registrant became subject to filing periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a result of a public offering of securities which became effective June 3, 1988 (Registration Nos. 33-21220 and 22-18246).
 
 

Item 1. Financial Statements

The Company

        United Air Lines, Inc. ("United," "we," "our" or the "Company") is a wholly owned subsidiary of UAL Corporation ("UAL").

Interim Financial Statements

        We prepared the consolidated financial statements shown here as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Some information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements that meet generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted as permitted by the SEC. We believe that the disclosures presented here are not misleading. The financial statements include all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments, reorganization items and other special items described below) that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results.

        Certain prior year financial statement items have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. These financial statements should be read together with the information included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2003.

        As of third quarter 2004, our Consolidated Statements of Operations reflect reclassifications in order to provide better clarity regarding our Mainline and Regional operations. Revenues and expenses for all of our United Express ("UAX") carriers are presented gross on our financial statements as "Regional Affiliates". Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. These reclassifications did not impact our operating income (loss) or net income (loss) for each period presented. For further details, see "United Express" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11

        Bankruptcy Proceedings. On December 9, 2002 (the "Petition Date"), UAL, United and 26 direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions to reorganize their businesses under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Bankruptcy Court is jointly administering these cases as "In re: UAL Corporation, et al., Case No. 02-48191." The consolidated financial statements shown here include certain subsidiaries that did not file to reorganize under Chapter 11. The assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are not considered material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee for the Northern District of Illinois has appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors (the "Creditors' Committee"). The Creditors' Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court concerning our reorganization. There can be no assurance that the Creditors' Committee will support our positions or our plan of reorganization, and any disagreements between the Creditors' Committee and us could protract the Chapter 11 process, hinder our ability to operate during the Chapter 11 process, and delay our emergence from Chapter 11.

        With the exception of our non-filing subsidiaries, we continue to operate our businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and applicable court orders. In general, as debtors-in-possession, we are authorized under Chapter 11 to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

        All vendors are being paid for all goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the ordinary course of business. However, under Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect most of our pre-petition liabilities are automatically stayed (except for liabilities relating to certain qualifying aircraft, aircraft engines and other aircraft-related equipment that are leased or subject to a security interest or conditional sale contract). Under Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, actions to collect such aircraft-related pre-petition liabilities are automatically stayed for 60 days only (our automatic stay ended on February 7, 2003), except under two conditions: (a) the debtor may extend the 60-day period by agreement with the relevant financier and with court approval; or (b) the debtor may agree to perform all of the obligations under the applicable financing and cure any defaults as required under the Bankruptcy Code. If neither of these conditions is met, the financier may demand the return of the aircraft and enforce any of its contractual rights or remedies to sell, lease or otherwise retain or dispose of such property.

        We have negotiated with lessors and lenders to restructure existing financings to reduce aircraft ownership costs to better reflect current market rates, and we have reached agreements in principle with respect to a substantial majority of our financed aircraft. However, in light of the final decision received from the Air Transportation Stabilization Board ("ATSB") regarding our loan application and the need for further cost reductions, we are re-examining these agreements and believe it likely that we will need to renegotiate one or more of them. Although we expect to be successful with respect to any such efforts, to the extent we are unable to restructure any financings we believe are unaffordable under the modified business plan, we may face the possibility that one or more financiers may seek to repossess their aircraft. Likewise, there is no assurance that those agreements in principle which are not restructured will be successfully converted to final contracts. To the extent we are unable to finalize those agreements there can be no assurance that we will be able to reach new agreements at comparable economics or that financiers will not repossess aircraft. The repossession of a significant number of aircraft could result in a material adverse affect on our financial and operational performance.

        We have also rejected or abandoned certain surplus aircraft to adjust our fleet size and composition to more closely match market demand. In addition, as part of on-going negotiations with financiers, we have converted many long-term financing arrangements into short-term operating leases and, in several instances, re-acquired previously rejected aircraft as circumstances warranted.

        Under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, we may assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including leases of real property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. Our Section 365 rights to assume, assume and assign, or reject unexpired leases of non-residential real estate expire on the earlier of the date of termination of our exclusive period to file a plan of reorganization (currently, December 1, 2004) or the date of the conclusion of a disclosure statement hearing in connection with a proposed plan of reorganization.

        In general, if we reject an executory contract, unexpired lease or aircraft, it is treated as a pre-petition breach of the lease or contract in question and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves us of performing any future obligations but entitles the lessor or contract counterparty to a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach and accordingly, the counterparty may file a claim against us for such damages. As a result, liabilities subject to compromise are likely to increase in the future, as a result of damage claims created by our rejection of various aircraft, executory contracts and unexpired leases. Generally, if we assume an aircraft financing agreement, executory contract or unexpired lease we are required to cure most existing defaults under such contract or lease. We expect that the assumption of certain executory contracts and unexpired leases may convert liabilities currently shown as subject to compromise to liabilities not subject to compromise.

        To successfully exit Chapter 11, we must obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of a plan of reorganization. A plan of reorganization would, among other things, resolve our pre-petition obligations and other liabilities subject to compromise and establish our corporate governance subsequent to exit from bankruptcy. The plan of reorganization would also address the terms and conditions of exit financing as part of our revised capital structure. There can be no assurance that we will obtain the necessary financing to exit from bankruptcy. We believe that UAL's presently outstanding equity securities will have no value as we expect those securities will be canceled under any proposed plan of reorganization. Thus, we urge that caution be exercised with respect to existing and future investments in any UAL equity security. The rights and claims of various creditors and security holders will also be determined by the plan. At this time, it is not possible to predict accurately the effect of the Chapter 11 reorganization process on our business, nor can we make any predictions concerning how certain claims will be valued in UAL's bankruptcy case.

        We are currently operating under an "exclusive period" which expires December 1, 2004, during which we are the only party permitted to file a plan of reorganization. The decision as to when we will file a plan of reorganization depends on the timing and outcome of numerous ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 process. We expect to file a plan of reorganization that provides for UAL's emergence from bankruptcy, but there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will confirm a plan of reorganization or that any such plan will be implemented successfully.

        DIP Financing.   In connection with UAL's Chapter 11 case, the Company arranged a debtor-in-possession secured financing ("DIP Financing"). The initial DIP Financing consisted of two facilities, a $300 million facility provided by Bank One N.A. ("Bank One Facility") and a $1.2 billion facility provided by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Citicorp USA, Inc., Bank One, N.A., and The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. ("Club Facility"). Subsequently, we reached agreements to modify terms of the Club Facility. The Club Facility currently consists of a revolving credit and letter of credit facility of $200 million and a term loan of $800 million, which matures on June 30, 2005. We have the option of borrowing under the Club Facility at an interest rate of the prime rate plus 4% or LIBOR plus 5% (with a LIBOR floor of 3%). As of September 30, 2004, we had repaid the Bank One Facility and had outstanding borrowings of $863 million under the Club Facility at a rate of 8%. In addition, letters of credit were issued under the Club Facility in the amount of $36 million.

         The terms of the amended Club Facility include covenants that require us to satisfy ongoing monthly financial requirements as determined by reference to EBITDAR (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and aircraft rents) thresholds and limitations on capital expenditures. In addition, we are required to maintain a minimum unrestricted cash balance of $600 million. The terms of the amended Club Facility also contain financial covenants that do not permit us to make payments inconsistent with our business plan, unless the lenders otherwise consent based on a modified business plan. To preserve the Company's liquidity, this business plan does not contemplate contributions to our pension plans.

        While we are currently in compliance with the terms of the Club Facility, we believe that due to record high fuel prices and continued weakness in the revenue environment, there is a strong possibility that we will not comply with the Club Facility's EBITDAR covenant in the fourth quarter. Under the current terms of the Club Facility, failure to comply with the EBITDAR covenant would constitute a default of the Club Facility, which would allow the lenders to accelerate the loan. We are currently in discussions with the Club Facility lenders regarding, among other things, the possibility of waiving the EBITDAR provisions for October, November and December 2004, retaining 100% of the proceeds received in connection with the sale of our equity investment in Orbitz, Inc. and increasing the unrestricted minimum cash balance covenant.

        Financial Statement Presentation.  We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 90-7 ("SOP 90-7"), "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code," and on a going-concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

        SOP 90-7 requires that the financial statements separate transactions and events that are directly associated with the restructuring from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, all transactions (including, but not limited to, all professional fees, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses) directly related to the reorganization and restructuring of the business are reported separately in the financial statements. The Statements of Consolidated Financial Position distinguishes pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise both from those that are not subject to compromise as well as from all post-petition liabilities. Liabilities subject to compromise are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.

        In addition, as a result of UAL's Chapter 11 case, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities (without substantial adjustments and/or changes in ownership) are subject to uncertainty. While operating as debtors-in-possession under the protection of Chapter 11 and subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court and the terms of the applicable DIP Financing covenants, or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business, we may sell or dispose of assets (including aircraft) and liquidate or settle liabilities for some amounts other than those reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Further, our plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts and classifications in the historical consolidated financial statements.

        As permitted under the bankruptcy process, our creditors have filed proofs of claim with the Bankruptcy Court. The total amount of such claims filed far exceeds our estimate of ultimate liability. We believe that many of these claims are invalid because they are duplicative, are based upon contingencies which have not occurred, have been amended or superseded by later filed claims, or are otherwise overstated. Differences in amount between claims filed by creditors and liabilities shown in our records are being investigated and resolved in connection with our claims resolution process. While we have made significant progress to date, we expect this process to continue for some time and believe that further reductions to the claims register will enable us to determine with more precision the likely range of creditor distributions under a proposed plan of reorganization. At this time, the ultimate number and allowed amount of such claims cannot be determined.

Stock Option Accounting

        We account for stock-based employee compensation plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." We have not incurred any stock-based employee compensation cost for stock options, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

        If compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans had been determined using the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company's net loss would have been reported as the pro forma amounts shown below:
 

Income Taxes

        Beginning in the third quarter of 2002, we established a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax asset. Thus, United has a zero percent effective tax rate for both 2003 and 2004. As of September 30, 2004, our valuation allowance totaled $2.8 billion. Further, we have determined that it is more likely than not that our gross deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances at September 30, 2004, will be realized through the reversals of existing deferred tax credits.

Retirement and Postretirement Plans

        In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") revised SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits", ("SFAS No. 132") effective for all interim periods following December 15, 2003. SFAS No. 132 revises employers' disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans including disclosures made in interim periods. While it does not change the measurement or recognition of those plans, it requires additional interim disclosures as detailed below.

        Our net periodic benefit cost included the following components for the three months and nine months ended September 30:
 

        After giving consideration to the temporary funding relief provided by the Pension Funding Equity Act of April 2004, our minimum required contribution to our defined benefit pension plan trusts for all employee groups is approximately $700 million in 2004. Of this total, we contributed $127 million (which is related to the 2003 plan year) during the first half of 2004. In July 2004, the Company announced that it was suspending contributions to its defined benefit pension plans to preserve its liquidity. At this time, the Company believes that in order to obtain exit financing, successfully reorganize and exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, it will be necessary to terminate and replace these pension plans. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this potential action.

Restricted Cash

        At September 30, 2004, United had $834 million in restricted cash, primarily representing security for worker compensation obligations, security deposits for airport leases and reserves with institutions that process the Company's sales.

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

        Liabilities subject to compromise refers to obligations which will be accounted for under a plan of reorganization, including claims incurred prior to the Petition Date. They result from known or potential claims to be resolved through the Chapter 11 process, and remain subject to future adjustments arising from negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, the determination as to the value of any collateral securing claims, proofs of claim or other events. To date, such adjustments, as reflected in reorganization expense, have been material and we anticipate that future adjustments will be material as well. Payment terms for these amounts will be established in connection with the Chapter 11 process.

        At September 30, 2004, liabilities subject to compromise of $13.8 billion consisted of:
 

United Express

        United has marketing agreements under which independent regional carriers, flying under the UAX name, feed passengers to other United-branded flights. During the second half of 2003, we reached new or substantially revised agreements with UAX carriers Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation, Mesa Air Group, SkyWest Airlines and Trans States Airlines.

        However, we were unable to reach a comparable market-based contract with Atlantic Coast Airlines ("ACA") and, on April 2, 2004, we agreed to end our UAX relationship with ACA and entered into a formal transition agreement. This orderly transition of UAX flying and ground handling began in June and was completed in August.

        To support these changes, we expanded our relationship with other UAX partners and entered into new agreements with Chautauqua Airlines, Republic Airlines, and Shuttle America. Additionally, we replaced ACA's ground-handling responsibilities at Chicago O'Hare, Washington Dulles and other cities.

        As discussed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we now report all UAX carrier revenues and expenses gross as "Regional Affiliates" on the financial statements. The following table shows the effect of these reclassifications on operating revenues and operating expenses:
 

Segment Information

        United has a global route network designed to transport passengers and cargo between destinations in North America, the Pacific, the Atlantic and Latin America. These regions constitute United's four reportable segments. For internal management and decision-making purposes, we have allocated expenses and revenues (as incorporated in our consolidated financial statements) to these segments as follows:
 
 
 

Other Comprehensive Income
 

        See "Special Items" note below for details regarding the 2003 pension liability adjustment and "Aircraft Fuel Hedging" note below for details regarding fuel hedge gains in 2004.

Reorganization Items

        We recognized the following reorganization expense in conjunction with our Chapter 11 filings:
 

        Aircraft rejection charges are non-cash items that include our estimate of claims resulting from United's rejection of certain aircraft financing obligations (and return of the associated aircraft) as part of the bankruptcy process.

        In the first quarter of 2003, we renegotiated certain off-balance sheet leases as part of the Section 1110 process. Under the terms of the revised leases, we surrendered our investment in the junior portion of the original lease debt to the original equity participant. As a result, our investment in the corresponding lease certificates was reduced to zero, resulting in a $215 million non-cash charge in reorganization items.

Special Items

         Aircraft Impairment. As a result of the review of our operating fleet as part of our overall restructuring, we decided to accelerate the retirement of our B767-200 aircraft from 2008 to 2005. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," we reviewed the fleet for impairment and wrote down the aircraft to their fair market values, as estimated using third-party appraisals, resulting in an impairment charge of $26 million in the third quarter of 2003.

        Aircraft Write-down. During the third quarter of 2003, we also incurred a $25 million charge in non-operating expense for the write-down of certain non-operating B767 aircraft.

       Air Canada. On April 1, 2003, Air Canada filed for protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") of the Canada Business Corporation Act. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a non-operating special charge of $137 million in connection with Air Canada's CCAA filing. The charge included $46 million for the impairment of our investment in Air Canada preferred stock and $91 million to record a liability resulting from our guarantee of Air Canada debt. We consider this liability to be a pre-petition obligation and accordingly, it is considered a liability subject to compromise.

       During the third quarter of 2004, Air Canada successfully emerged from protection under the CCAA. We had filed a pre-petition claim against Air Canada based on our equity interest in three Airbus A330 aircraft leased to Air Canada. As part of its plan of reorganization, Air Canada offered its unsecured creditors the opportunity to participate in their initial public offering. We subscribed to 986,986 shares in the reorganized company in August 2004 and sold them in October 2004 for a nominal gain. Separately, we sold our pre-petition claim and recorded a non-operating gain of  $18 million during the third quarter of 2004.

         Curtailment Charge.  During the second quarter of 2003, we revalued our pension and postretirement plans for certain employee groups as a result of the ratification of new labor contracts for our major employee groups and employee furloughs. The significant actuarial assumptions used for the revaluation of the plans were unchanged from December 31, 2002, except for the discount rate and weighted average salary scale. The revaluation of the plans resulted in special termination and curtailment charges of $152 million recognized in salaries and related costs in the second quarter of 2003. In addition, as a direct result of the revaluation of the pension plans, stockholders' equity and pension intangible assets were reduced by approximately $964 million and $200 million, respectively. These changes to the pension and postretirement plans also reduced salaries and related costs by approximately $100 million in the second quarter of 2003 or approximately $550 million on an annualized basis.

        Government Assistance.  In May 2003, we received approximately $300 million in compensation under the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act. The legislation included approximately $3 billion of financial aid for U.S. air carriers as follows: $2.4 billion to compensate air carriers for expenses and forgone revenues related to aviation security, including $100 million for reinforcing cockpit doors; suspension of the passenger and air carrier security fees from June 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003; and an extension of government-provided war-risk insurance through December 2004.

Reconciliation of Accruals

        In the period following September 11, 2001, we recorded an accrual of $162 million to reflect our estimate of the early termination fees associated with certain contracts. This obligation has yet to be resolved, and therefore continues to be included in liabilities subject to compromise in its entirety.
 
 

Related Party Transactions

        United recognized the following amounts related to transactions with UAL Loyalty Services, Inc. ("ULS"):
 

Aircraft Fuel Hedging

        Aircraft fuel represented 18% and 17%, respectively, of our total operating expenses for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

        During the second quarter of 2004, we began to implement a strategy to hedge a portion of our price risk related to projected jet fuel requirements primarily through collar options. The collars (designated as cash flow hedges) involve the purchase of fuel call