SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Commission File Number 1-6926
C. R. BARD, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
New Jersey |
22-1454160 |
|
(State of incorporation) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
730 Central Avenue, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (908) 277-8000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
Common Stock - $.25 par value |
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes X No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $2,921,418,960 based on the closing price of stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2002. As of January 31, 2003, there were 51,619,621 shares of Common Stock, $.25 par value per share, outstanding.
The company's definitive Proxy Statement in connection with its 2003 annual meeting of shareholders is March 8incorporated by reference with respect to certain information contained therein in Part III of this Form 10-K
C. R. BARD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PART I |
||
|
|
Item 1. |
Business |
|
|
Item 2. |
Properties |
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
|
PART II |
||
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
Item 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation |
|
|
Item 7a. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants and Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
PART III |
||
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
|
|
Item 14. |
Controls and Procedures |
|
PART IV |
||
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10ag |
Supplemental Retirement Benefits for William H. Longfield |
|
|
Exhibit 10al |
C. R. Bard, Inc. First Amendment To Amended And Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement With William H. Longfield |
|
|
Exhibit 10az |
C. R. Bard, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan, Amended and Restated |
|
|
Exhibit 12.1 |
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
Exhibit 21 |
Parents and Subsidiaries of Registrant |
|
|
Exhibit 23.1 |
Independent Auditors' Consent |
|
|
Exhibit 23.2 |
Information Regarding Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP |
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
Exhibit 99.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
C. R. Bard, Inc. (the "company" or "Bard") is engaged in the design, manufacture, packaging, distribution and sale of medical, surgical, diagnostic and patient care devices. Charles Russell Bard started the company in 1907. One of its first medical products was the silk urethral catheter imported from France. In 1923, the company was incorporated as C. R. Bard, Inc. and distributed an assortment of urological and surgical products. Bard became a publicly traded company in 1963 and five years later was traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Today, the company markets its products worldwide to hospitals, individual health care professionals, extended care facilities and alternate site facilities. In general, the company's products are intended to be used once and then discarded. Bard holds strong market positions in vascular, urological, oncological and surgical diagnostic and interventional products.
Bard has an acquisition strategy that targets small research or developing companies as well as larger established companies with market leadership positions. In addition to acquiring companies, Bard has expanded its business in the medical field by acquiring product lines, entering into licensing agreements and joint ventures, and making equity investments in companies with emerging technologies. As a matter of policy, Bard is focused only on companies or products in the health care market. Over its 95-year history, some of the company's major acquisitions have included:
|
Year |
Company |
Products at Time of Purchase |
|
1966 |
United States Catheter & Instrument Co |
Urological and cardiovascular specialty products |
|
1980 |
Davol, Inc. |
Foley catheters |
|
1989 |
Catheter Technology Corporation |
Groshong catheters |
|
1996 |
IMPRA, Inc. |
Vascular grafts |
The company spent approximately $25.3 million in 2002, $44.7 million in 2001 and $68.6 million in 2000 for the acquisition of businesses, patents, trademarks, purchase rights and other related items to augment its existing product lines. The company has also sold, liquidated or divested product lines over the years, including its cardiology businesses in 1998 and 1999. On May 29, 2001, Bard entered into an agreement that provided for the merger of Bard with a subsidiary of Tyco International Ltd ("Tyco Merger Agreement"). On February 6, 2002, Bard and Tyco
On February 6, 2002, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tyco International Ltd.agreed to terminate this agreement. Each company agreed to bear its own costs and expenses. Neither company paid a break-up fee. In the first quarter of 2002, the company recorded a pre-tax charge of $6.2 million associated with the termination of the Tyco Merger Agreement.
The company files annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The public can obtain copies of these materials by visiting the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington DC 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by accessing the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC, the company makes copies available to the public free of charge on or through its website at http://www.crbard.com.
Item 1. Business (continued)
Product Group Information
The company reports its sales around the concept of disease state management in four major product group categories: vascular, urological, oncological and surgical. The company also has a product group of otherongoing products. The divested products category contains divested and discontinued product lines. The following table sets forth for the three years ended December 31, 2002, the approximate percent contribution by product line to Bard's consolidated net sales on a worldwide basis.
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|||||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
|
Vascular |
20% |
21% |
22% |
||
|
Urology |
33% |
33% |
33% |
||
|
Oncology |
24% |
23% |
23% |
||
|
Surgery |
18% |
18% |
17% |
||
|
Other |
5% |
5% |
5% |
||
|
Total net sales |
100% |
100% |
100% |
||
Vascular Diagnosis and Intervention
Bard develops, manufactures and markets a wide range of products for the peripheral vascular market. Bard's line of minimally invasive vascular products includes peripheral angioplasty stents, catheters, guidewires, introducers and accessories, vena cava filters and biopsy devices; electrophysiology products including cardiac mapping and electrophysiology laboratory systems, and diagnostic and temporary pacing electrode catheters; fabrics and meshes and implantable blood vessel replacements. Bard's memotherm nitinol stent technology from the company's Angiomed subsidiary establishes the company as a major player in this peripheral growth market. With the acquisition of IMPRA, Inc. in 1996, Bard has the broadest line available of vascular grafts.
Urological Diagnosis and Intervention
The Foley catheter, which Bard introduced in 1934, remains one of the most important products in the urological field. Foley catheters continue to be marketed in individual sterile packages, but, more importantly, they are included in sterile procedural kits and trays, a concept pioneered by Bard. The company is the market leader in Foley catheters, which currently are Bard's largest selling urological product. Other urological products include urine monitoring and collection systems; ureteral stents; and specialty devices for incontinence, ureteroscopic procedures and stone removal. Important new urological products are the Infection Control Foley catheter (Bardex I.C.), which substantially reduces the rate of urinary tract infections; the innovative collagen implant and sling materials used to treat urinary incontinence; and Brachytheraphy services, devices and radioactive seeds used to treat prostate cancer. These are all examples of Bard's commitment to new technology that will reduce health care costs and improve patient outcomes.
Item 1. Business (continued)
Oncological Diagnosis and Intervention
Bard's oncology products cover a wide range of devices used in the treatment and management of various cancers. These include specialty access catheters and ports; gastroenterological products (endoscopic accessories, percutaneous feeding devices and stents); and biopsy devices. The company's chemotherapy products serve a well-established market where Bard holds a major share position. Kidney dialysis products tap a similar technology and offer higher growth potential. Bard's Opti-Flo dialysis catheter can cut the length of a kidney dialysis session by as much as 20%, a major benefit for both the patient and the clinician. New product introductions include Bard's endoscopic suturing system (EndoCinch™) to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, a potential precursor to cancer that affects nearly a million people in the United States alone. The company has introduced stents for colorectal and esophageal cancer patients, which help maintain body functions and improve their quality of life. Through the company's Dymax subsidiary, the company has added to its product line an ultrasound device specifically designed to locate and identify blood vessels for accurate vascular access.
Surgical Specialties
Bard's surgical specialties products include meshes for vessel and hernia repair , irrigation devices for orthopaedic, laparoscopic and gynecological procedures, and products for topical hemostasis. The innovation of Bard's PerFix™ plug and Composix™ sheet has significantly improved the way hernias are repaired and has reduced the time needed for repair from hours to minutes. Hernia operations can now be done in an outpatient setting in approximately 20 minutes. The patient generally can return to normal activity with little or no recovery time. The company's performance irrigation product line includes the HydroFlex Multi-Application Irrigation Pump System™ which helps operating rooms perform more efficiently by providing effective irrigation for arthroscopy, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy procedures. Also included in the company's surgical product group are the successful topical hemostatic products, Avitene™ and Avifoam.™
International
Bard markets its products through 22 subsidiaries and a joint venture in 92 countries outside the United States. The products sold in the company's international markets include many of the products described above under Product Group Information. However the principal markets, products and methods of distribution in the company's international businesses vary with market size and stage of development. Principal markets are Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom and continental Europe. The company believes that its geographically based sales organization gives the company greater flexibility in international markets. Approximately 49% of international sales are of products manufactured by Bard in the United States, Puerto Rico or Mexico. For financial reporting purposes, revenues and identifiable assets in significant geographic areas are presented in Note 12 Segment Information of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Item 1. Business (continued)
Bard's foreign operations are subject to certain financial and other risks, and international operations in general present complex tax and money management issues requiring sophisticated analysis to meet the company's financial objectives. Relationships with customers and effective terms of sale frequently vary by country, often with longer-term receivables than are typical in the United States. Inventory management is an important business concern due to the potential for rapidly changing business conditions and currency exposure. Currency exchange rate fluctuations can affect income from, and profitability of, international operations. The company attempts to hedge these exposures to reduce the effects of foreign currency fluctuations on net earnings. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk" and Note 6 Derivative Instruments of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Competition
The company competes in the therapeutic and diagnostic medical markets both in the United States and around the world. These markets are characterized by rapid change resulting from technological advances and scientific discoveries. The company depends more on its consistently reliable product quality, dependable service and its ability to develop products to meet market needs than on patent protection, although many of its products are patented or are the subject of patent applications. The company faces a mix of competitors ranging from large manufacturers with multiple business lines to smaller manufacturers that offer a limited selection of products.
Major shifts in markets have occurred in connection with product problems, physician advisories and safety alerts, reflecting the importance of product quality in the medical device industry. In the current environment of managed care, economically motivated buyers, consolidation among health care providers, increased competition and declining reimbursement rates have increased the importance of price. In order for the company to compete effectively it must create or acquire advanced technology and incorporate this technology into proprietary products addressing areas of significant demand in the marketplace, obtain regulatory approvals and manufacture and successfully market these products.
In keeping with the increased emphasis on cost-effectiveness in health care delivery, the current trend among hospitals and other customers of medical device manufacturers is to consolidate into larger purchasing groups to enhance purchasing power. The medical device industry has also experienced some consolidation, partly in order to offer a broader range of products to large purchasers. As a result, transactions with customers are larger, more complex and tend to involve more long-term contracts than in the past. This enhanced purchasing power has placed pressure on product pricing. The company believes it is well positioned to respond to changes resulting from this worldwide trend toward cost containment.
Item 1. Business (continued)
Marketing
The company's products are distributed domestically directly to hospitals and other healthcare institutions as well as through numerous hospital/surgical supply and other medical specialty distributors with whom the company has distributor agreements. In international markets, products are distributed either directly or through distributors with the practice varying by country. Full-time representatives of the company in domestic and international markets carry on sales promotion. Sales to distributors, which supply the company's products to many end users, accounted for approximately 38%, 37% and 38% of the company's net sales in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively and the five largest distributors combined accounted for approximately 70%, 68% and 63% of such sales for the corresponding years. The company is not dependent on any single customer, and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the company's consolidated net sales in 2002, 2001 or 2000.
In order to service its customers, both within and outside the United States, the company maintains inventories at distribution facilities in most of its principal marketing areas. Orders are normally shipped within a matter of days after receipt. Backlog is normally not significant for the company.
Most of the products sold by the company, whether manufactured by the company or by others, are sold under the BARD® trade name or trademark or other trademarks owned by the company. Products manufactured for the company by outside suppliers are produced according to the company's specifications.
Regulation
The development, manufacture, sale and distribution of the company's products are subject to comprehensive government regulation both within and outside the United States. Government regulation, including detailed inspection of and controls over, research and laboratory procedures, clinical investigations, manufacturing, marketing, sampling, distribution, record keeping and storage and disposal practices, substantially increases the time, difficulty and costs incurred in obtaining and maintaining the approval to market newly developed and existing products. Government regulatory actions can result in the seizure or recall of products, suspension or revocation of the authority necessary for their production and sale, and other civil or criminal sanctions.
In the early 1990s, the review time by the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA ") to clear medical devices for commercial release lengthened and the number of clearances of 510(k) submissions and approval of pre-market applications decreased. In response to public and congressional concern, the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 was adopted with the intent of bringing better definition to the review process. While FDA review times have improved since passage of the 1997 Act, there can be no assurance that the FD A review process will not involve delays or that clearances will be granted on a timely basis.
Item 1. Business (continued)
Medical device laws are also in effect in many of the countries in which the company does business outside the United States. These range from comprehensive device approval requirements for some or all of the company's medical device products to requests for product data or certifications. Inspection of and controls over manufacturing as well as monitoring of device-related adverse events are also components of most of these regulatory systems. The number and scope of these requirements are increasing.
Health Care Cost Containment and Third-Party Reimbursement
Reimbursement is an increasingly important consideration in the development, introduction and marketing of medical devices and new technologies. Difficulty in obtaining adequate reimbursement can be a significant barrier to the adoption and subsequent market success of a new device. The consequences can include reduced patient access to new technology and a disincentive for manufacturers to produce innovative products.
As the largest single healthcare insurer in the United States, Medicare has a profound influence on the healthcare market. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) formulates national and local coverage policy and sets reimbursement rates for facilities and physician providers. With regard to private healthcare insurers, the predominant payors are managed care organizations, covering approximately 200 million individuals in the United States, and including Blue Cross Blue Shield, Kaiser, Aetna, Cigna and United Health. Private payors often, but not always, follow the lead of the Medicare program when setting coverage and payment guidelines.
Regardless of the payor, three basic steps must occur for a product or procedure to be considered reimbursable:
In general, the complexity and the integration of the three processes are the most significant challenge to manufacturers seeking reimbursable status for a product. Coverage criteria vary from payor to payor. Obtaining a new procedure code, often a requirement for new products to be properly reimbursed, can be a lengthy process (12-18 months or more) with an uncertain outcome. Payment systems are moving away from the fee-for-service, charge-based systems and towards prospective, bundled payments covering a variety of products and services rolled together, with the objective of incentivizing the efficient use of resources. The 1997 Balanced Budget Act mandated the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), which sets payment rates for facilities and physicians every year, requiring careful monitoring and interpretation by manufacturers. Many Bard products are not affected by considerations of establishing reimbursement, because their use falls within care modalities covered by predetermined Diagnosis Re lated Groups (DRG's) in the case of inpatient services, or Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APC's) in the case of ambulatory care services. Under that system, an aggregate prospective reimbursement amount is set for each DRG or APC, which covers a bundled group of
Item 1. Business (continued)
services and products provided to the patient whose care or condition comes within the particular DRG or APC. However, when consideration is being given to an acquisition or new product concept, coverage, coding and payment must also be taken into account. Further, where devices are within established DRG or APC coverage, there may nevertheless be issues of sufficiency of the reimbursement level for the DRG or APC.
Initiatives to limit the growth of health care costs, including price regulation, are also underway in several other countries in which the company does business. Implementation of health care reforms now under consideration in Japan, Germany, France and other countries may limit the price or reimbursement level of the company's products. The ability of customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for their products and services from government and third-party payors is critical to the success of medical technology companies around the world. Several foreign governments have attempted to dramatically reshape reimbursement policies affecting medical technology and devices. Further restrictions on reimbursement of the company's customers likely will have an impact on the products purchased by customers and the prices they are willing to pay.
Raw Materials
The company uses a wide variety of readily available plastics, textiles, alloys and latex materials for conversion into its devices. These materials are primarily purchased from external suppliers. Certain of the raw materials are available only from single-source suppliers. Materials are purchased from selected suppliers for reasons of quality assurance, sole-source availability, cost effectiveness or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. Bard works closely with its suppliers to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability. Either party upon short notice can terminate agreements with certain suppliers. The establishment of additional or replacement suppliers for certain materials cannot always be accomplished quickly due to the FDA approval system, the complex nature of the manufacturing processes employed by many suppliers, or proprietary manufacturing techniques. In addition, in an effort to reduce potential product liability exposure, certain suppliers h ave terminated or are planning to terminate sales of certain materials to companies that manufacture implantable medical devices. The Biomaterials Access Assurance Act was adopted in 1998 to help ensure availability of raw materials to the manufacturers of medical devices. Management cannot estimate the impact of this law on supplier arrangements at this time. The company's inability to replace a supplier, or a delay in doing so, could result in the company being unable to manufacture and sell certain of its products, including certain of the company's higher margin products.
Environment
The company is subject to various environmental laws and regulations both within and outside the United States. The operations of the company, like those of other medical device companies, involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. While the company continues to make capital and operational expenditures relating to compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations, management believes that such compliance will not have a material impact on the company's financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1. Business (continued)
Employees
The company employs approximately 7,700 persons.
Seasonality
The company's business is not affected to any material extent by seasonal factors.
Research and Development
The company is engaged in both internal and external research and development to introduce new products, to enhance the effectiveness, ease of use, safety and reliability of its existing products and to expand the applications for which the uses of its products are appropriate. The company is dedicated to developing novel technologies that will furnish health care providers with a more complete line of products to treat medical conditions through minimally invasive procedures and in a cost-effective manner. The company's research and development expenditures amounted to approximately $61.7 million in 2002, $53.4 million in 2001 and $53.2 million in 2000.
The company evaluates developing technologies in areas where it may have technological or marketing expertise for possible investment or acquisition. The company has invested in several start-up ventures. In return for funding and technology, the company has received equity interests, marketing and other rights. Included in fiscal 2002 research and development expenditures were $3.5 million associated with the company's recently disclosed agreement to acquire the assets of Genyx Medical and a milestone payment related to the company's implantable pump project.
Intellectual Property
Patents and other proprietary rights are important to Bard's business. The company also relies upon trade secrets, manufacturing know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to maintain and improve its competitive position. The company reviews third-party patents and patent applications, as available, in an effort to develop an effective patent strategy, avoid infringement of third-party patents, identify licensing opportunities and monitor the patent claims of others.
The company owns numerous patents and has numerous patent applications pending in the United States and in certain foreign countries that relate to aspects of the technology used in many of the company's products. The company's policy is to file patent applications in the United States and foreign countries where rights are available and the company believes it is commercially advantageous to do so. However, the standards for international protection of intellectual property vary widely. The company cannot assure that pending patent applications will result in issued patents, that patents issued to or licensed by the company will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors or that its patents will not be found to be invalid. The company does not consider its business to be materially dependent upon any individual patent.
Item 1. Business (continued)
The company operates in an industry susceptible to significant patent legal claims. At any given time, the company generally is involved as both a plaintiff and defendant in a number of patent infringement actions. Patent litigation can result in significant royalty or other payments or result in injunctions that can prevent the sale of products.
Item 2. Properties
The executive offices of the company are located in Murray Hill, New Jersey, in facilities that the company owns. Domestic manufacturing and development units are located in Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Utah. Sales offices and distribution points are in these locations as well as others. Outside the United States, the company has plants or offices in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
The company owns approximately 1.9 million square feet of space in 18 locations and leases approximately 1.0 million square feet of space in 45 locations. All these facilities are well maintained and suitable for the operations conducted in them.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, including claims of alleged personal injuries as a result of exposure to natural rubber latex gloves distributed by the company and other product liability matters, environmental matters and disputes on agreements which arise in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the company operates in an industry susceptible to significant patent legal claims. At any given time, the company generally is involved as both a plaintiff and defendant in a number of patent infringement actions. Patent litigation can result in significant royalty or other payments or result in injunctions that can prevent the sale of products.
In May 2002, the company was served with a complaint in an action entitled Nelson N. Stone, M.D., et al. v. C. R. Bard, Inc., et al., filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The action alleges that the company breached agreements with the plaintiffs by failing to use appropriate efforts to promote the growth of a business that the company purchased from the plaintiffs, thereby depriving the plaintiffs of additional consideration. The plaintiffs seek damages, including punitive damages, and a release from noncompetition agreements. The company believes that the claims have no merit and intends to defend vigorously.
The company is subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws governing, among other things, the generation, storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials and emissions or discharges into the ground, air or water. The company is or may become a party to proceedings brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and similar state laws. These proceedings seek to require the owners or operators of contaminated sites, transporters of hazardous materials to the sites and generators of hazardous materials disposed of at the sites to clean up
Item 3. Legal Proceedings (continued)
the sites or to reimburse the government for cleanup costs. In most cases, there are other potentially responsible parties that may be liable for any remediation costs. In these cases, the government alleges that the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the cleanup costs; however, these proceedings are frequently resolved so that the allocation of cleanup costs among the parties more nearly reflects the relative contributions of the parties to the site situation. The company's potential liability varies greatly from site to site. For some sites the potential liability is de minimis and for others the costs of cleanup have not yet been determined.
The company believes that the outcomes of these proceedings and claims will likely be disposed of over an extended period of time. In some cases, the claimants seek damages, as well as other relief, which, if granted, could require significant expenditures. However, while it is not feasible to predict the outcome of many of these proceedings, based upon the company's experience, current information and applicable law, the company does not expect these proceedings to have a materially adverse effect on consolidated financial position or liquidity, but could possibly be material to the consolidated results of operations of any one period.
Item 4. Results of Votes of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below is the name, age, position, five-year business history and other information with respect to each executive officer of the company as of February 21, 2003. No family relationships exist among the officers of the company. The Board of Directors elects all officers of the company annually.
|
Name |
Age |
Position |
|
William H. Longfield |
64 |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
Timothy M. Ring |
45 |
Group President |
|
John H. Weiland |
47 |
Group President |
|
Charles P. Slacik |
48 |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Susan Alpert Ph.D., M.D. |
57 |
Vice President, Regulatory Sciences |
|
Nadia J. Bernstein |
57 |
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
Charles P. Grom |
55 |
Vice President and Controller |
|
Bronwen K. Kelly |
50 |
Vice President, Human Resources |
|
Robert L. Mellen |
46 |
Vice President, Strategic Planning and Business Development |
|
Todd C. Schermerhorn |
42 |
Vice President and Treasurer |
On February 13, 2003, the company announced that Mr. Ring has been elected Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Weiland has been elected President and Chief Operating Officer, in each case effective August 8, 2003. Mr. Longfield has announced that he will retire as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer effective August 7, 2003. He will continue to serve his term as a Director.
William H. Longfield joined Bard in 1989 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the company, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cambridge Group, Inc. Previously, Mr. Longfield was Executive Vice President - Operations of Lifemark, Inc. and prior thereto, he was employed by American Hospital Supply Corporation where he held a number of positions including President of the Convertors Division. Mr. Longfield was elected Bard's President and Chief Operating Officer in 1991 and delegated the duties and responsibilities of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1993. He was elected President and Chief Executive Officer in 1994 and elected to his present position in 1995. Mr. Longfield was elected to the Board of Directors in 1990.
Timothy M. Ring joined Bard in 1992 as Vice President, Human Resources after 10 years with Abbott Laboratories, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Ring was promoted to Group Vice President, International Operations. Mr. Ring has been Group President since 1997 with most recent oversight for Bard's Corporate Healthcare, Peripheral Vascular, Access Systems and Electrophysiology Divisions as well as for all Bard's businesses in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
John H. Weiland joined Bard in 1996 from Dentsply International as Group Vice President. He was promoted to Group President in 1997 with most recent oversight for Bard's Davol, Urological, Medical and Endoscopic Technology Divisions as well as responsibility for all Bard's businesses in Japan, Latin and Central America, Canada and Asia Pacific. Mr. Weiland previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Diagnostics, Inc. and was with American Hospital Supply and Baxter Healthcare. He served one year as a White House Fellow in the role of Special Assistant in the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Officers of the Registrant (continued)
Charles P. Slacik joined Bard in 1999 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the company, he was with American Home Products Corporation since 1982 in various financial and operating positions. Mr. Slacik's most recent position at American Home Products was as Chief Operating Officer for Solgar Vitamin and Herb Company. In addition, he served as Senior Vice President of Finance for American Home Products' Whitehall-Robins Healthcare Division and Sherwood-Davis & Geck Corp., Corporate Controller for American Home Products and Executive Vice President of Whitehall-Robins Healthcare Division.
Susan Alpert, Ph.D., M.D. joined Bard in 2000 in her current position. Prior to joining the company, she was with the Food and Drug Administration in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health as Director of the Office of Device Evaluation from 1993-1999 and most recently in the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition as the Director of Food Safety.
Nadia J. BernsteinC. Adler joined Bard in 1999 as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary . Prior to joining Bard, she was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Montefiore Medical Center in New York City since 1987. Before Montefiore, Ms. BernsteinAdler was a partner in the law firm of Rosenman & Colin where she served as a member of the litigation department and later their corporate department.
Charles P. Grom joined Bard in 1977 as Corporate Accounting Manager and was promoted to Corporate Cost and Budget Manager in 1980. Mr. Grom served as Vice President and Division Controller for various Bard divisions between 1981 and 1988 when he was promoted to Assistant Corporate Controller. He was elected Corporate Controller in 1994 and to his present position in 1995.
Bronwen K. Kelly joined Bard in 2002 in her current role. Prior to joining Bard, she was with American Home Products as Vice President, Human Resources for the Global Agricultural Products Group. Previously, Ms. Kelly held positions with American Cyanimid Company, including Director, Human Resources for the Cyanimid International, Agricultural Products Division and Director, Human Resources for Shulton USA.
Robert L. Mellen joined Bard in 1993 as Director of Marketing, Bard Gynecology. Mr. Mellen was promoted to Vice President, Marketing for Bard Access Systems in 1994, Vice President and General Manager for Bard Radiology in 1997 and President, Bard Peripheral Vascular Technologies in 2000. He was appointed to his present position in 2002. Prior to joining the company, he was with BOC Health Care.
Todd C. Schermerhorn joined Bard in 1985 as cost analyst and has held various financial positions including Controller of the Vascular Systems Division and Vice President and Controller of the USCI1 Division. In 1996, Most recently Mr. Schermerhorn was promoted to Vice President and Group Controller for Bard's Global Cardiology Unit. He was promoted to his present position in 1998.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
Market and Market Prices of Common Stock
The company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol: BCR. The following table illustrates the high and low sales prices as traded on the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter during the last two years.
|
2002 |
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
Year |
|
High |
$63.94 |
$59.44 |
$57.65 |
$59.87 |
$63.94 |
|
Low |
$44.10 |
$52.76 |
$45.75 |
$50.07 |
$44.10 |
|
Close |
$59.05 |
$56.58 |
$54.63 |
$58.00 |
$58.00 |
|
2001 |
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
Year |
|
High |
$47.63 |
$57.25 |
$60.25 |
$64.95 |
$64.95 |
|
Low |
$40.86 |
$41.60 |
$43.25 |
$49.82 |
$40.86 |
|
Close |
$45.40 |
$56.95 |
$51.41 |
$64.50 |
$64.50 |
|
Title of Class |
Number of Record Holders of the company's common stock as of January 31, 2003 |
|
Common Stock - $.25 par value |
5,427 |
Dividends
The company paid cash dividends of approximately $45.0 million, or $.86 per share, in 2002 and approximately $43.1 million, or $.84 per share, in 2001. The following table illustrates the dividends paid per share in each of the indicated quarters.
|
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
Year |
|
|
2002 |
$.21 |
$.21 |
$.22 |
$.22 |
$.86 |
|
2001 |
$.21 |
$.21 |
$.21 |
$.21 |
$.84 |
The first quarter 2003 dividend of $.22 per share was paid on January 31, 2003 to shareholders of record on January 20, 2003.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters (continued)
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets forth information with respect to shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the company's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002.
|
Plan category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected |
|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
4,358,705(1) |
$42.23 |
2,788,764(3) |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2) |
64,720 |
$40.02 |
391,336 |
Total |
4,423,425 |
$42.19 |
3,180,100 |
(1) Includes the 1988 Directors Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated, the 1990 Long Term Incentive Plan, the 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and the Medchem Plan assumed pursuant to the company's acquisition of Medchem Products, Inc. Included in column (a) are 1,147 options under the Medchem Plan at a weighted-average exercise price of $17.24.
(2) Includes the Management Stock Purchase Plan, which is described in Note 9 Shareholders' Investment of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data (continued) - For the Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA |
||||||
|
Net sales |
$1,273,800 |
$1,181,300 |
$1,098,800 |
$1,036,500 |
$1,164,700 |
$1,213,500 |
|
Net income |
$155,000 |
$143,200 |
$106,900 |
$118,100 |
$252,300 |
$72,300 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA |
||||||
|
Total assets |
$1,416,700 |
$1,279,900 |
$1,089,200 |
$1,126,400 |
$1,079,800 |
$1,279,300 |
|
Working capital |
$441,100 |
$391,000 |
$302,100 |
$176,600 |
$185,700 |
$252,900 |
|
Long-term debt |
$152,200 |
$156,400 |
$204,300 |
$158,400 |
$160,000 |
$340,700 |
|
Total debt |
$153,100 |
$157,200 |
$205,100 |
$288,700 |
$162,000 |
$443,700 |
|
Shareholders' investment |
$880,400 |
$788,700 |
$613,900 |
$574,300 |
$567,600 |
$573,100 |
|
COMMON STOCK DATA |
||||||
|
Basic earnings per share |
$2.98 |
$2.80 |
$2.11 |
$2.31 |
$4.54 |
$1.27 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
$2.94 |
$2.75 |
$2.09 |
$2.28 |
$4.51 |
$1.26 |
|
Cash dividends per share |
$.86 |
$.84 |
$.82 |
$.78 |
$.74 |
$.70 |
|
Shareholders' investment per share |
$17.06 |
$15.06 |
$12.06 |
$11.31 |
$11.02 |
$10.09 |
|
Average common shares outstanding (000's) |
52,000 |
51,200 |
50,700 |
51,183 |
55,566 |
56,971 |
|
Shareholders of record |
5,454 |
5,983 |
7,195 |
7,344 |
6,650 |
7,088 |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data (continued) - For the Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|
Return on average shareholders' investment |
18.6% |
20.4% |
18.0% |
20.7% |
44.2% |
12.3% |
|
Net income/net sales |
12.2% |
12.1% |
9.7% |
11.4% |
21.7% |
6.0% |
|
Days - accounts receivable |
49.8 |
52.5 |
62.9 |
70.8 |
72.8 |
69.6 |
|
Days - inventory |
90.9 |
119.0 |
139.5 |
158.9 |
151.9 |
151.9 |
|
Total debt/total capitalization |
14.8% |
16.6% |
25.0% |
33.5% |
22.2% |
43.6% |
|
Interest expense |
$12,600 |
$14,200 |
$19,300 |
$19,300 |
$26,400 |
$32,900 |
|
Research and development expense |
$61,700 |
$53,400 |
$53,200 |
$53,800 |
$72,700 |
$85,800 |
|
Number of employees |
7,700 |
7,700 |
8,100 |
7,700 |
7,700 |
9,550 |
|
Net sales per employee |
$165.5 |
$153.4 |
$135.7 |
$134.6 |
$151.3 |
$127.1 |
|
Net income per employee |
$20.1 |
$18.6 |
$13.2 |
$15.3 |
$32.8 |
$7.6 |
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions
Our Business
For 95 years, C. R. Bard, Inc. has committed its resources to creating innovative solutions to meet the needs of both health care providers and their patients. The company is a global leader in the development, manufacture and supply of products and services to the health care industry. Bard views its product portfolios on a net sales basis by disease state management categories. Disease state management is an approach that expands the focus from products and technologies to the underlying clinical condition. The company believes that disease state management positions the company as an indispensable partner to health care deliverers. Bard is committed to maintaining and developing leadership franchises within these disease states. The company evaluates profitability and associated investments on an enterprise-wide basis due to shared geographic infrastructures.
Net Sales
Bard reported 2002 consolidated net sales of $1,273.8 million, an increase of 8% over the 2001 consolidated net sales of $1,181.3 million. Bard's 2001 consolidated net sales increased 8% over the $1,098.8 million consolidated net sales for fiscal 2000.
The geographic breakdown by the location of the external customer for each of the last three years is presented below:
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
|
United States |
73% |
73% |
72% |
||
|
Europe |
17% |
17% |
17% |
||
|
Japan |
5% |
5% |
5% |
||
|
Rest of world |
5% |
5% |
6% |
||
|
Total net sales |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Consolidated net sales were affected by price changes that had the effect of increasing consolidated net sales by 0.7% for the year ended December 31, 2002 and had the effect of reducing consolidated net sales by 0.5% for the year ended December 31, 2001. Consolidated net sales were also affected by the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. Exchange rate fluctuations had the effect of increasing consolidated net sales by 0.7% in 2002 and decreasing consolidated net sales by 1.1% in 2001. The primary exchange rate movement that impacts net sales is the movement of the Euro compared to the United States dollar. The impact of exchange rate movements on net sales is not indicative of the impact on net earnings due to the offsetting impact of exchange rate movements on operating costs and expenses, costs incurred in other currencies and the company's hedging activities.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions (continued)
Bard's 2002 net sales in the United States of $928.9 million increased 8% over the 2001 net sales in the United States of $862.5 million. Bard's 2002 international net sales of $345.1 million increased 8% over the 2001 international net sales of $318.8 million. Adjusting for exchange rate fluctuations, international net sales increased 6% on a constant currency basis for the fiscal year ended 2002. Bard's 2001 net sales in the United States increased 9% over the $788.3 million net sales in the United States for fiscal 2000. Bard's 2001 international net sales increased 3% over the $310.5 million international net sales for fiscal 2000. Adjusting for exchange rate fluctuations, international net sales increased 5% on a constant currency basis for the fiscal year ended 2001.
Presented below is a discussion of consolidated net sales by disease state for the fiscal years ended 2002, 2001 and 2000.
|
Product Group Summary of Net Sales |
|||||||||
|
(dollars in thousands) |
For the Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
FY 02/01 |
FY 01/00 |
|||||
|
Vascular |
$259,700 |
$250,900 |
$241,200 |
4% |
4% |
||||
|
Urology |
419,700 |
390,100 |
361,200 |
8% |
8% |
||||
|
Oncology |
299,000 |
274,600 |
253,000 |
9% |
9% |
||||
|
Surgery |
229,500 |
205,200 |
182,600 |
12% |
12% |
||||
|
Other |
65,900 |
60,500 |
60,800 |
9% |
0% |
||||
|
Total net sales |
$1,273,800 |
$1,181,300 |
$1,098,800 |
8% |
8% |
||||
Vascular Products
- Bard markets a wide range of products for the peripheral vascular market including interventional radiology products, electrophysiology products and graft products. In total, consolidated net sales of vascular products increased 4% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as compared to the prior year. United States net sales of vascular products experienced 5% growth for the year ended 2002 while international net sales increased 2%. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, consolidated net sales of vascular products increased 4% as compared to the prior year. United States net sales of vascular products experienced 9% growth in fiscal 2001 while international net sales of vascular products decreased 1% in fiscal 2001 compared to the prior year.Interventional radiology products comprised 44% of the vascular products group in fiscal 2002, and net sales of these products increased 12% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the prior year. The company's self-expanding stent line grew approximately 34% for the year, largely as a result of the introduction of a new 6 French Luminexx™ stent. In addition, the Conquest™ balloon has powered the company's peripheral angioplasty line, which grew approximately 17% for the year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, interventional radiology sales increased 4% over the prior year.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions (continued)
Net sales of electrophysiology products increased 2% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the prior year. United States net sales of electrophysiology products grew 6% for the year ending 2002 while international net sales declined 2% compared to the prior year. The company's electrophysiology business was slow to recover in Germany, where its dedicated sales force experienced high turnover associated with the company's proposed merger with Tyco, which was terminated in the first quarter of 2002. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, electrophysiology net sales increased 10% over the prior year.
Graft product sales declined 6% for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the prior year due to the loss of a distribution agreement. Graft product sales were essential flat for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to the prior year.
Urological Products - Bard markets a wide range of products for the urological market including basic drainage products, continence products and urological specialty products. In total, consolidated net sales of urological products were $419.7 million an increase of 8% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the prior year. United States net sales represent 76% of total urological sales and grew 7% for the year compared to the prior year. Fiscal 2002 international net sales of urological products increased 10% over the prior year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, consolidated net sales of urological products increased 8% as compared to the prior year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, United States net sales of urological products experienced 11% growth while international net sales were approximately flat from the prior year.
Basic drainage products continue to provide a solid foundation to the company's urology business. Fiscal 2002 basic drainage revenues of $261.8 million increased 7% over the prior year. Approximately one-third of the company's 2002 basic drainage revenues were infection control products, which grew 17% over the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2001, basic drainage products grew 1%, with infection control products growing 21% over the prior year.
Net sales of urological specialties grew 6% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Brachytherapy products were the largest contributor to this increase, with net sales of these products growing 10% over the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2001, brachytherapy products were the largest contributor to urological specialties growth, with net sales of these products increasing over 100% from the prior year to a level of approximately $45.0 million.
Continence is the smallest category in urological products. Net sales of continence products grew 13% for the year ended December 31, 2002, led by the company's surgical incontinence line, which grew over 61% from the prior year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, net sales of continence products declined 6% over the prior year primarily due to weak sales in the Contigen® line.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions (continued)
Oncological Products - The company's oncological products include specialty access products and gastroenterological products. Consolidated net sales of oncological products increased 9% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the prior year. In fiscal 2002, United States net sales of oncological products increased 8%, while international net sales increased approximately 14%. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, consolidated net sales of oncological products increased 9% as compared to the prior year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, United States net sales experienced 6% growth while international net sales increased 17% over the prior year.
Specialty access product sales of $206.2 comprised 69% of the oncological product group and increased 12% over the prior year. Peripherally inserted central catheters continue to be the fastest growing products in the specialty access category, growing approximately 35% for fiscal 2002. The Dymax Site-Rite™ product line grew well at approximately 15% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Net sales of specialty access products grew 7% for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Net sales of gastroenterological products grew 2% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Growth in this product group was derived primarily from international distribution agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2001, gastroenterological products grew 28% due to the growth of new products including EndoCinch®.
Surgical Products - Consolidated net sales of surgical specialty products increased 12% for the year ended December 31, 2002, as compared to the prior year. Both the United States and international net sales in surgical products increased 12% for the year ended 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2001, consolidated net sales of surgical specialty products grew 12% as compared to the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2001, United States net sales of surgical products experienced 15% growth while international net sales of surgical products increased 2% over the prior year.
The company's hernia product offerings comprised 64% of the surgical product group revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and net sales of these products experienced their strongest growth yet of approximately 26% over the prior year. Ventral hernia products continue to drive the majority of overall hernia growth. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the company extended its hernia line with the launch of Ventralex™, a product designed specifically for umbilical hernias. For the year ended December 31, 2001, the company's hernia products grew 21% compared to the prior year.
Other Products - The other product group includes irrigation, wound drainage and certain OEM products. For the year ended December 31, 2002, consolidated net sales of other products were $66.1 million, an increase of 9% from the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2001, consolidated net sales of other products were $60.5 million, essentially flat with the prior year.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions (continued)
Costs and Expenses
The following is a summary of major costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales for the years shown:
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
|
Cost of goods sold |
45.7% |
46.6% |
45.4% |
||
|
Marketing, selling and administrative |
29.6% |
30.8% |
32.0% |
||
|
Research and development expense |
4.8% |
4.5% |
4.8% |
||
|
Interest expense |
1.0% |
1.2% |
1.8% |
||
|
Other (income) expense, net |
2.3% |
(.4)% |
2.0% |
||
|
Total costs and expenses |
83.4% |
82.7% |
86.0% |
Cost of goods sold
- The company's cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 45.7%, a reduction of 0.9% from the cost of goods sold percentage for the year ended December 31, 2001 of 46.6%. This decrease was primarily due to favorable sales mix and cost improvements. During fiscal 2002, the company recorded nonrecurring charges related to divisional and manufacturing realignments. The company's continuing manufacturing realignment efforts have contributed to the improved margins in fiscal 2002. Primarily due to these realignments, the company expects its cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales to continue to decline in 2003. The company's cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2001 of 46.6% was 1.2% higher than the cost of goods sold percentage for the year ended December 31, 2000 of 45.4%. Product mix and the impact of currency contributed to this increase.Marketing, selling and administrative - The company's marketing, selling and administrative costs as a percentage of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 29.6%, a reduction of 1.2% from the marketing, selling and administrative costs for the year ended December 31, 2001 of 30.8%. The company's marketing, selling and administrative costs as a percentage of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2001 was 1.2% less than the marketing, selling and administrative costs as a percentage of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2000 of 32.0%. Fiscal year 2001 and 2000 marketing, selling and administrative expense included goodwill amortization of $13.2 million pretax and $13.4 million pretax, respectively. Goodwill amortization is not required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 per the issuance by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") of Statements of Financial Accounting ("FAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets"("FAS 142").
Research and development expense - Fiscal year 2002 research and development expenditures of $61.7 million represented a 15.5% increase over the prior year's expenditures of $53.4 million. Included in fiscal 2002 research and development expenditures was a $3.5 million payment associated with the company's recently disclosed agreement with Genyx Medical, Inc. and a milestone payment related to the company's implantable pump project. Fiscal year 2001 research and development expenditures were essentially flat with fiscal year 2000's research and development expenditures of $53.2 million.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions (continued)
Interest expense
- Fiscal year 2002 interest expense of $12.6 million decreased 11.3% over the prior year's interest expense of $14.2 million. Fiscal year 2001 interest expense decreased 26.4% over fiscal year 2000's interest expense of $19.3 million. This is consistent with the company's lower commercial paper levels.Other (income) expense, net
|
(dollars in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||
|
Interest income |
$(6,500) |
$(6,200) |
$(3,700) |
||
|
Foreign exchange losses (gains) |
(300) |
1,100 |
(800) |
||
|
Legal and patent settlements, net |
(5,000) |
(1,200) |
(5,000) |
||
|
Endologix write-off and asset impairments |
--- |
--- |
40,300 |
||
|
Acquired R&D |
--- |
800 |
9,300 |
||
|
Gains from asset dispositions |
--- |
(500) |
(11,000) |
||
|
Divisional and manufacturing restructuring |
33,700 |
--- |
--- |
||
|
Merger termination costs |
6,200 |
--- |
--- |
||
|
Other, net |
500 |
100 |
7,300 |
||
|
Total other (income) expense, net |
$28,600 |
$(5,900) |
$36,400 |
||
|
Gain from dispositions of cardiology businesses |
--- |
--- |
$15,400 |
In addition to interest income and exchange gains and losses, 2002 other (income) expense, net includes special charges related to the realignment of certain divisional and manufacturing operations ($33.7 million pretax) and the termination of the proposed Tyco merger ($6.2 million pretax). These charges are offset with the reversal of certain legal accruals ($5.0 million pretax.)
There were no nonrecurring items in 2001. In the fiscal year 2000, the company settled all remaining open issues related to the 1998 dispositions of its cardiology businesses and recorded a gain of $15.4 million pretax. This gain was recorded on a separate line "Gain from dispositions of cardiology businesses". In addition, during fiscal 2000 the company recorded a charge of $9.3 million pretax related to product line acquisitions, a gain of $5.0 million pretax related to legal and patent settlements, a gain from asset dispositions of $11.0 million pretax and a charge of $40.3 million pretax related to not exercising an option to acquire Endologix, Inc.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and of Financial Conditions
(continued)Taxes
- The following is a reconciliation between the effective tax rates and the statutory rates:|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
|
U.S. federal statutory rate |
35% |
35% |
35% |
||
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
2% |
3% |
3% |
||
|
Operations taxed at less than U.S. rate |
(11)% |
(9)% |
(9)% |
||
|
Other, net |
1% |
1% |
2% |
||
|
Effective tax rate |
27% |
30% |
31% |
The 3.0% change in the company's effective tax rate between 2002 and 2001 is primarily attributable to the receipt during 2002 of a new tax grant at a lower rate for the company's Puerto Rico manufacturing operations and the elimination of goodwill amortization per FAS 142. The company's goodwill amortization was primarily nontax-deductible. The lower grant rate was retroactively applied to the period from July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002 and, accordingly, a $3.5 million nonrecurring tax credit was recorded in the third quarter of 2002 related to this grant.
Net Income and Earnings Per Share
Bard reported 2002 consolidated net income of $155.0 million, an increase of 8% over the 2001 consolidated net income of $143.2 million. Bard reported 2002 diluted earnings per share of $2.94, a 7% increase over 2001 diluted earnings per share of $2.75. 2001 consolidated net income of $143.2 million and diluted earnings per share of $2.75 represented increases of 34% and 32% over 2000 consolidated net income of $106.9 million and diluted earnings per share of $2.09, respectively. Several nonrecurring items affected the results for the three years ended December 31, 2002. The following table summarizes the impact of nonrecurring items on Bard's consolidated net income and diluted earnings per share.
|
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
FY02/01 |
FY01/00 |
|
Net income - GAAP basis |
$155.0 |
$143.2 |
$106.9 |
8% |
34% |
|
Nonrecurring items |
21.7 |
--- |
18.5 |
--- |
--- |
|
After-tax impact of goodwill amortization |
--- |
12.3 |
12.5 |